Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Urine hepcidin has additive value in ruling out cardiopulmonary bypass-associated acute kidney injury: an observational cohort study

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 5Email author and
  • 1
Critical Care201115:R186

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10339

  • Received: 25 February 2011
  • Accepted: 4 August 2011
  • Published:

Abstract

Introduction

Conventional markers of acute kidney injury (AKI) lack diagnostic accuracy and are expressed only late after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Recently, interest has focused on hepcidin, a regulator of iron homeostasis, as a unique renal biomarker.

Methods

We studied 100 adult patients in the control arm of a randomized, controlled trial http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT00672334 who were identified as being at increased risk of AKI after cardiac surgery with CPB. AKI was defined according to the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease classification of AKI classification stage. Samples of plasma and urine were obtained simultaneously (1) before CPB (2) six hours after the start of CPB and (3) twenty-four hours after CPB. Plasma and urine hepcidin 25-isoforms were quantified by competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay.

Results

In AKI-free patients (N = 91), urine hepcidin concentrations had largely increased at six and twenty-four hours after CPB, and they were three to seven times higher compared to patients with subsequent AKI (N = 9) in whom postoperative urine hepcidin remained at preoperative levels (P = 0.004, P = 0.002). Furthermore, higher urine hepcidin and, even more so, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine at six hours after CPB discriminated patients who did not develop AKI (area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic curve 0.80 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.71 to 0.87] and 0.88 [95% CI 0.78 to 0.97]) or did not need renal replacement therapy initiation (AUC 0.81 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.88] 0.88 [95% CI 0.70 to 0.99]) from those who did. At six hours, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine was an independent predictor of ruling out AKI (P = 0.011). Plasma hepcidin did not predict no development of AKI. The study findings remained essentially unchanged after excluding patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that urine hepcidin is an early predictive biomarker of ruling out AKI after CPB, thereby contributing to early patient risk stratification.

Keywords

  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Renal Replacement Therapy
  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Urine Creatinine
  • Hepcidin Level

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is relatively common and carries significantly increased morbidity, mortality and cost [1]. It is now the second most common cause of severe AKI in critically ill patients [2]. Its pathogenesis is complex [3], and the development of targeted new treatments is likely to depend on early diagnosis. Unfortunately, conventional markers of AKI, such as serum creatinine, serum urea and urine output, lack diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and often identify patients with AKI only 24 or 48 hours after surgery [46]. Accordingly, progress in this field is likely to depend, at least in part, on the availability of novel biomarkers for early and reliable diagnosis of AKI.

Over the past decade a number of early markers of AKI have been identified using genomic [7, 8] and proteomic [9] laboratory methods. These biomarkers may prove useful in the early identification of patients at risk [5, 6]. More recently, interest has focused on hepcidin as a regulator of iron homeostasis [10]. The hepcidin gene is regulated by iron loading, hypoxia or inflammation [1012], and its protein is produced by liver and kidney cells [13]. In a pilot study of a nested cohort of 22 patients with AKI and 22 without AKI, Ho et al.[14] reported a greater postoperative signal/noise ratio for urine hepcidin levels in those patients who did not go on to develop AKI, suggesting that hepcidin may be the first clinically useful negative biomarker for AKI after CPB.

Accordingly, we investigated the association of urine and plasma hepcidin levels in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of CPB. We aimed to (1) assess the predictive value of early postoperative urine hepcidin and plasma hepcidin for ruling out AKI, (2) investigate the role of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the predictive value of hepcidin and (3) explore whether changes in urine hepcidin reflect changes in plasma hepcidin.

Materials and methods

Patient population

For the purpose of our study, we investigated all 100 adult patients of the German study site (German Heart Center Berlin) enrolled into the control arm of the Sodium Bicarbonate in Cardiac Surgery Study http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT00672334, a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of perioperative sodium bicarbonate versus placebo for the prevention of AKI and the exploration of renal biomarkers in patients at increased renal risk undergoing cardiac surgery necessitating the use of CPB. Increased risk of AKI was defined as at least one risk factor for postoperative AKI: age ≥70 years; New York Heart Association class III/IV or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%; insulin-depending diabetes mellitus; prior cardiac surgery; valvular surgery (with or without coronary artery bypass graft) or preoperative serum creatinine >120 μmol/L.

We excluded patients undergoing emergency operations (time between hospital admission to operation ≤24 hours) or off-pump surgery, patients presenting with advanced CKD (serum creatinine >300 μmol/L) or kidney transplant and patients <18 years old. Clinical practice was not changed or modified for the purpose of the study.

CKD was defined as preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/minute/1.73 m2[15]. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation reexpressed for use with the serum creatinine values standardized to isotope dilution mass spectroscopy [16]. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was initiated if the patient fulfilled at least one of the following clinical criteria: oliguria (urine output <100 mL/>6 hours) that was unresponsive to fluid resuscitation measures, hyperkalemia (potassium >6.5 mmol/L), severe acidosis (pH <7.2) or clinically significant organ edema (for example, lung) in the setting of renal failure.

Samples were obtained from 100 patients enrolled in the placebo group (sodium chloride 1.2 L starting with anesthesia induction and finishing 24 hours thereafter). Patients were recruited between January 2009 and June 2010. The local Institutional Review Board approved this investigation, and written, informed consent was obtained from each patient, including the investigation of novel renal biomarkers. The study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sampling

Samples of plasma and urine were obtained simultaneously (1) directly after insertion of an arterial line (baseline) before induction of anesthesia, (2) at 6 hours after commencement of CPB and (3) at 24 hours after commencement of CPB. The timing of sampling was chosen to detect renal biomarkers before serum creatinine increases and was therefore limited to the first 24 hours postoperatively. Aliquots of plasma and urine were frozen and stored at -80°C immediately after collection and centrifugation and were kept frozen on dry ice during transport.

Data collection and outcome definition

Demographic and clinical data (Table 1) were collected at baseline and for the first 48 hours. Serum creatinine was measured at baseline, at 6 and 24 hours after commencement of CPB, daily within the first postoperative week and, if required, until hospital discharge. The primary outcome, AKI, was defined based on the baseline-to-peak serum creatinine increase (>50%) or urine output decrease (<0.5 ml/kg/hr for at least 6 hours) during the first seven postoperative days using the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease classification of AKI (RIFLE) consensus definition of AKI [17, 18]. Additional analyses were performed to assess the ability of hepcidin to predict the severity of AKI using RIFLE classes R, I and F and the need for RRT initiation. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines [19] for reporting observational studies were used.
Table 1

Characteristics of patients developing AKI compared with those who did not develop AKI

 

All Patients

Excluding Patients With

Preoperative CKD

Variables

AKI

N = 9

No AKI

N = 91

P value

AKI

N = 5

No AKI

N = 69

P value

Age, y

74 (70-77)

67 (56-73)

0.015

75 (73-84)

65 (55-72)

0.003

Female, n

2 (22.2%)

31 (34.1%)

0.47

1 (20.0%)

19 (27.5%)

>0.99

Preoperative eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2

61 (52-91)

74 (62-88)

0.58

86 (72-100)

80 (70-92)

0.52

Preoperative CKD, n

4 (44.5%)

22 (24.2%)

0.23

-

-

-

LVEF <35%, n

3 (33.3%)

8 (8.8%)

0.06

1 (20.0%)

6 (8.7%)

0.40

Atrial fibrillation

6 (66.7%)

25 (27.5%)

0.015

4 (80.0%)

18 (26.1%)

0.025

Arterial hypertension

8 (88.9%)

65 (71.4%)

0.26

5 (100.0%)

48 (69.6%)

0.31

COPD

3 (33.3%)

8 (8.8%)

0.025

2 (40.0%)

6 (8.7%)

0.087

Diabetes mellitus, n

3 (33.3%)

17 (18.7%)

0.38

0 (0.0%)

12 (17.4%)

0.58

PVD, n

4 (44.5%)

17 (18.7%)

0.09

2 (40.0%)

11 (15.9%)

0.21

AKI, acute kidney disease; AKI defined as RIFLE class R or worse including serum creatinine increase and urine output decrease.

Diabetes mellitus defined as diabetes on medication (insulin or oral antidiabetics).

CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction;

PVD, peripheral vascular disease.

Median (25th to 75th percentiles).

aAKI, acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PVD, peripheral vascular disease. AKI is defined as Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease classification of AKI (RIFLE) class R or worse, including serum creatinine increase and urine output decrease. Diabetes mellitus is defined as patients with diabetes on medication (insulin or oral antidiabetics). Data are medians (25th to 75th percentiles) unless otherwise indicated.

Biochemical analysis

Coinvestigators performing hepcidin assays were blinded to patient details and AKI classification. Human urine and plasma hepcidin 25-isoforms were measured by competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay, as previously described [20], by Intrinsic LifeSciences LLC (La Jolla, CA, USA). The lower limit of hepcidin detection was 5.5 ng/mL. The median coefficients of variation were 10% for intraassay precision and 6% for interassay reproducibility. Hepcidin stability during sample storage was tested prior to this study with median change in hepcidin concentrations in plasma <5% and in urine <6% after six months at -80°C. For the purposes of this study, samples were assayed after storage at -80°C. Hepcidin values are expressed as nanograms per milliliter. To compensate for perioperative variation in urine dilution, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine was calculated and expressed as nanograms of hepcidin per milligram of creatinine. Serum creatinine assays were carried out by Austin Health pathology services (Melbourne, Australia) using the modified Jaffé method. Fractional excretion (FE) of hepcidin, that is, the proportion of filtered hepcidin that appears in urine, was calculated using the following formula:

where Uhepcidin = urine hepcidin concentration, Plhepcidin = plasma hepcidin concentration, Plcreat = plasma creatinine concentration and Ucreat = urine creatinine concentration.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MedCalc 11.5 software (Mariakerke, Belgium). Categorical data were reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the mean percentage and were compared using Fisher's exact test. After testing for normal distribution, continuous data were reported as medians with 25th to 75th percentiles, and nonparametric data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Continuous data over time were compared using the one-way repeated measures analysis of variance by ranks (Friedman test). We used nonparametric bivariate correlation and report Spearman correlation coefficients (r). The ability of hepcidin to predict AKI was assessed by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and further reported as areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% CIs. An AUC-ROC value of >0.7 was taken to indicate reasonable biomarker performance and >0.8 was taken to indicate good biomarker performance [21]. An AUC-ROC difference >0.1 units between biomarkers was defined as significant. ROC curve optimal cutoff values for AKI diagnosis, for curves with a statistically significant AUC, were defined as the point that maximized the Youden index, defined as (sensitivity + specificity) - 1 [22]. The increased discriminative value of the biomarkers regarding the composite end point was studied by assessing the net reclassification improvement (NRI) as described by Pencina et al.[23]. Univariate and multivariate stepwise regression analyses were undertaken to assess predictors of no AKI after CPB. Variables tested on univariate relation with incidence of no AKI included clinically relevant variables, all of which are displayed in Table 1 as well as the type and duration of surgery and renal biomarkers at six hours after the start of CPB. Multivariate logistic regression modeling included clinically relevant variables with a univariate P value <0.1 (age, atrial fibrillation, LVEF <35%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], peripheral vascular disease [PVD]) and renal biomarkers. Logarithmic transformations were applied when necessary before multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Statistical significance was denoted by two-sided P values <0.05.

Results

Sampling

Figure 1 shows the patient flow through the study. Three hundred ninety-four consecutive patients were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 200 patients were randomized, with all of them undergoing surgery as planned. Of the 100 control patients (analyzed cohort on hepcidin), all had full clinical data sets and complete sampling, except in two patients (no AKI) from whom plasma and urine samples could not be collected at 24 hours after CPB.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Patient flow through the study . CPB, cardiopulmonary bypasshttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT00672334.

Patient characteristics

Compared with patients with postoperative AKI, AKI-free patients (n = 91) were younger and less frequently had preoperative atrial fibrillation and COPD (Table 1). Type and duration of operation did not differ between patients with postoperative AKI and those without, whereas perioperative fluid balance, dose of furosemide and volume of red blood cell transfusion were lower and outcomes were better, including less frequent need for RRT initiation, in AKI-free patients (Table 2). Of patients with AKI, RRT was initiated in three cases, and in those without AKI, RRT was commenced in two patients, in both cases due to anuria for less than six hours and preoperative CKD.
Table 2

Interventions and outcomesa

 

All patients

Excluding patients with preoperative CKD

Variables

AKI ( n = 9)

No AKI ( n = 91)

P value

AKI ( n = 5)

No AKI ( n = 69)

P value

CABG surgery, n (%)

2 (22.2%)

17 (18.7%)

0.68

1 (20.0%)

13 (18.8%)

>0.99

Valve surgery, n (%)

4 (44.5%)

46 (50.5%)

>0.99

2 (40.0%)

37 (53.6%)

0.66

CABG and valve surgery, n (%)

3 (33.3%)

21 (23.1%)

0.68

2 (40.0%)

14 (20.3%)

0.29

Thoracic aortic surgery, n (%)

0 (0.0%)

7 (7.7%)

>0.99

0 (0.0%)

5 (7.3%)

>0.99

Previous cardiothoracic operation, n (%)

2 (22.2%)

26 (28.6%)

>0.99

1 (20.0%)

23 (33.3%)

>0.99

Duration of bypass, minutes

125 (100 to 172)

119 (91 to 158)

0.62

109 (80 to 146)

119 (90 to 156)

0.57

Fluid balanceb, mL

4,980 (3,000 to 16,200)

3,100 (1,690 to 4,660)

0.035

4,920 (450 to 16,200)

3,100 (1,260 to 4,800)

0.4

Furosemideb, n (%)

9 (100%)

84 (92.3%)

0.39

5 (100.0%)

63 (91.3%)

>0.99

Furosemideb, mg

130 (60 to 460)

50 (20 to 90)

0.003

160 (35 to 672)

45 (20 to 70)

0.05

Vasopressor useb, n (%)

7 (77.8%)

65 (71.4%)

0.69

5 (100.0%)

49 (71.0%)

0.32

Inotrope useb, n (%)

8 (88.9%)

51 (63.7%)

0.13

4 (80.0%)

45 (65.2%)

0.66

Blood transfusionb, n (%)

8 (88.9%)

52 (57.1%)

0.06

4 (80.0%)

39 (56.5%)

0.39

Blood transfusionb, mL

1,000 (500 to 6,380)

500 (0 to 500)

0.005

1,250 (250 to 6,800)

250 (0 to 500)

0.048

LOS in hospital, days

14 (8 to 19)

9 (7 to 14)

0.024

14 (8 to 19)

9 (7 to 14)

0.48

Need for RRT, n (%)

3 (33.3%)

2 (2.2%)

0.005

2 (40.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.004

Hospital mortality, n (%)

3 (33.3%)

0 (0%)

0.001

1 (20.0%)

0. (0.0%)

0.068

aAKI, acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; LOS, length of stay; RRT, renal replacement therapy. AKI is defined as Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease classification of AKI (RIFLE) class R or worse including serum creatinine increase and urine output decrease. Data are medians (25th to 75th percentiles) unless otherwise indicated. bIncluding intraoperative and 48-hour postoperative values.

Urine hepcidin

Starting with a nonsignificant difference at baseline, at six hours and at twenty-four hours after commencement of CPB, urine hepcidin levels were significantly higher in AKI-free patients (Figure 2A). AUC-ROC curves for urine hepcidin at six hours for the discrimination of AKI-free patients from patients with AKI was 0.80 (Figure 4A). Further, the negative predictive value for not developing AKI was 96.3% and the positive predictive value was 31.6%. At six hours, the NRI of urine hepcidin for ruling out AKI was 17% compared to serum creatinine. For the prediction of no RRT initiation, the AUC-ROC curve for urine hepcidin at six hours was 0.81 (Figure 5A). The predictive value at 24 hours remained essentially unchanged (no AKI: AUC-ROC curve 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.90; no RRT: 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.89).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Urine hepcidin concentration over time. Patients not developing acute kidney injury (AKI) (white bars) are compared to those with AKI (hatched bars) (A) for all patients and (B) after excluding patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Error bars at top and bottom define th 95% confidence interval and the black lines within boxes the medians.

When each RIFLE class was considered, the AUC-ROC curves for urine hepcidin at six hours were 0.81 for not developing RIFLE R (n = 4) (95% CI 0.71 to 0.88, sensitivity 75%, specificity 86%, cutoff >120 ng/mL), 0.81 for not developing RIFLE I (n = 3) (95% CI 0.72 to 0.89, sensitivity 100%, specificity 62%, cutoff >460 ng/mL) and 0.75 for not developing RIFLE F (n = 2) (95% CI 0.65 to 0.83, sensitivity 100%, specificity 58%, cutoff >550 ng/mL).

Urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine

At baseline, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine (Table 3) tended to be higher in AKI-free patients. At six and twenty-four hours after commencement of CPB, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine was significantly higher in patients not developing AKI (Table 3). The AUC-ROC curves were 0.88 for predicting an AKI-free status (Figure 4B) and 0.88 for no RRT initiation (Figure 5B). At 24 hours, the AUC-ROC curve declined (no AKI: 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.87; no RRT: 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.92).
Table 3

Perioperative hepcidin indicesa

 

All patients

Excluding patients with preoperative CKD

Hepcidin index

No AKI ( n = 91)

AKI ( n = 9)

P value

No AKI ( n = 69)

AKI ( n = 5)

P value

Urine hepcidin/urine creatinine, ng/mg

      

   Baseline

308 (122 to 583)

120 (34 to 295)

0.07

309 (143 to 570)

164 (100 to 633)

0.6

   6 hours after CPB start

5,175 (2,086 to 9,539)

1,229 (314 to 2,379)

<0.001

5,402 (2,100 to 9,300)

1,400 (639 to 2,379)

0.009

   24 hours after CPB startb

3,255 (1,576 to 6,652)

1,345 (537 to 3,583)

0.07

3,143 (1,798 to 6,585)

1,345 (971 to 3,362)

0.06

Friedman test

<0.001

0.005

 

<0.001

0.11

 

Urine creatinine, mg/mL

      

   Baseline

1.14 (0.57 to 1.74)

0.92 (0.51 to 1.83)

0.52

1.28 (0.60 to 1.96)

1.66 (0.78 to 2.10)

0.71

   6 hours after CPB start

0.19 (0.10 to 0.28)

0.21 (0.10 to 0.30)

0.84

0.19 (0.11 to 0.28)

0.21 (0.12 to 0.30)

0.97

   24 hours after CPB startb

0.46 (0.24 to 0.71)

0.22 (0.12 to 0.29)

0.008

0.52 (0.29 to 0.73)

0.22 (0.18 to 0.37)

0.022

Friedman test

<0.001

0.03

 

<0.001

0.17

 

Urine/plasma hepcidin ratio

      

   Baseline

2.6 (1.2 to 4.9)

1.1 (0.2 to 5.6)

0.18

2.8 (1.2 to 4.8)

4.6 (1.6 to 8.4)

0.41

   6 hours after CPB start

3.1 (1.5 to 5.3)

1.0 (0.2 to 3.1)

0.047

3.6 (1.9 to 5.9)

3.0 (1.0 to 46.7)

0.59

   24 hours after CPB startb

6.9 (2.0 to 13.3)

1.2 (0.6 to 2.4)

0.011

8.2 (3.8 to 15.1)

2.3 (0.8 to 11.6)

0.11

Friedman test

<0.001

0.69

 

<0.001

0.74

 

Fractional hepcidin excretion, %

      

   Baseline

2.4 (1.5 to 4.1)

1.7 (0.7 to 2.5)

0.17

2.3 (1.5 to 2.9)

2.5 (1.8 to 4.7)

0.58

   6 hours after CPB start

22.1 (12.2 to 30.0)

8.3 (1.7 to 19.5)

0.005

22.0 (15.1 to 30.5)

16.3 (3.6 to 22.5)

0.19

   24 hours after CPB startb

14.7 (9.5 to 25.2)

8.1 (4.5 to 46.5)

0.35

15.3 (9.9 to 25.2)

8.1 (5.1 to 55.7)

0.6

Friedman test

<0.001

0.021

 

<0.001

0.47

 

aAKI, acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CPB; cardiopulmonary bypass. AKI is defined as Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease classification of AKI (RIFLE) class R or worse including serum creatinine increase and urine output decrease. Data are medians (25th to 75th percentiles) unless otherwise indicated. bValues at 24 hours after CPB start refer to 89 patients without AKI and 9 patients with AKI.

Urine creatinine at six hours after CPB alone did not separate patients with subsequent AKI from those without (Table 3). Changes (from baseline to six hours) in urine hepcidin levels adjusted to urine creatinine did not change the predictive value and did not indicate a carryover effect from baseline to postoperative values, given a different relative change (Table 4).
Table 4

Changes in urine hepcidin levels adjusted to urine creatininea

Urine hepcidin/urine creatinine

AKI (n= 9)

No AKI (n= 91)

P value

Δ 6 to 0 hours, ng/mg

1,079 (85 to 2,195)

4,085 (1,998 to 8,736)

<0.001

Δ 6 to 0 hours, %

626 (108 to 1,541)

1,444 (867 to 3,269)

0.016

Δ 24 to 0 hours, ng/mg

1,142 (344 to 3,379)

2,821 (1,266 to 6,482)

0.119

Δ 24 to 0 hours, %

925 (270 to 1,825)

939 (338 to 2,458)

0.717

Δ 24 to 6 hours, ng/mg

325 (-397 to 1,959)

-1,051 (-4,350 to 1,531)

0.079

Δ 24 to 6 hours, %

139 (-29 to 235)

-33 (-71 to 71)

0.02

aAKI, acute kidney injury. Data are medians (25th to 75th percentiles). Urine hepcidin/urine creatinine 6 hours to 0 hours for AKI: area under the curve receiver operating characteristic curve 0.88 (0.79 to 0.98) (P < 0.001), sensitivity 75%, specificity 87%, cutoff 1,320 ng/mg.

Plasma hepcidin

Plasma hepcidin concentrations were three to seven times lower compared to urine hepcidin in patients not developing AKI (Figure 3A vs. Figure 2A). At baseline, patients who did not develop AKI had a mean plasma hepcidin concentration of 112 ng/mL (range, 78 to 203 ng/mL) compared to 55 ng/mL (range, 50 to 146 ng/mL) in patients who developed AKI (Figure 3A). Hepcidin levels at six hours after the start of CPB tripled in patients who developed AKI (167 ng/mL; range, 73 to 325 ng/mL), whereas they only doubled (261 ng/mL; range, 154 to 386 ng/mL) in those who remained AKI-free. Postoperative plasma hepcidin concentration had a lower AUC-ROC curve than (un)adjusted urine hepcidin and was not useful in separating patients with or without AKI (Figures 3A and 4C). The same applied to RRT initiation (Figure 5C).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Plasma hepcidin concentration over time. Patients not developing AKI (white bars) are compared to those with AKI (hatched bars) (A) for all patients and (B) after excluding patients with CKD. Error bars at top and bottom define th 95% confidence interval and the black lines within boxes the medians.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Predictive indices of hepcidin at six hours after commencement of CPB for not developing AKI. (A) Urine hepcidin. (B) Urine hepcidin/urine creatinine. (C) Plasma hepcidin. AUC-ROC, area under the curve receiver operating characteristic curve.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Predictive indices of hepcidin at six hours for not requiring postoperative renal replacement therapy initiation. (A) Urine hepcidin. (B) Urine hepcidin/urine creatinine. (C) Plasma hepcidin.

Independent predictors of AKI

At six hours after commencement of CPB, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine (P = 0.016) was the only independent predictive biomarker for no AKI (Table 5), and the quality of the model improved considerably (from R2 = 0.42 to R2 = 0.63). Serum creatinine at six hours after commencement of CPB had no reasonable AUC-ROC (0.69 [95% CI 0.48 to 0.93]) and was not an independent predictor of AKI (P > 0.1). Other clinical predictors (model 0) included age, impaired LVEF, COPD and PVD and were retained in the models 1 through 3 after inclusion of renal biomarkers (Table 5).
Table 5

Multivariate logistic regression analysis (all patients) of risk factors and biomarkers at six hours after CPB start for the prediction of no AKIa

 

Model 0 (R2 = 0.42)

Model 1 (R2 = 0.63)

Model 2 (R2 = 0.43)

Model 3(R2 = 0.50)

Risk factors and biomarkers

Regression coefficient (B) (SE)

P value

Regression coefficient (B) (SE)

P value

Regression coefficient (B) (SE)

P value

Regression coefficient (B) (SE)

P value

Age, years

-0.2 (0.1)

0.015

-0.2 (0.1)

0.06

-0.1 (0.1)

0.06

-0.2 (0.1)

0.036

LVEF <35%

-2.9 (1.1)

0.009

-4.1 (1.6)

0.008

-2.7 (1.1)

0.011

-3.0 (1.2)

0.01

COPD

-2.2 (1.0)

0.036

-2.4 (1.3)

0.06

-2.0 (1.0)

0.044

-2.5 (1.1)

0.026

Log urine hepcidin/urine creatinine, ng/mg

  

2.9 (1.1)

0.011

    

Log urine hepcidin, ng/mL

    

1.2 (0.7)

0.09

  

Log plasma hepcidin, ng/mL

      

2.7 (2.5)

0.56

aAKI, acute kidney injury; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SE, standard error. Variables tested on univariate relation with incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) included all variables displayed in Table 1, type and duration of surgery and renal biomarkers at six hours after start of CPB. Multivariate logistic regression analysis included relevant variables for (no) AKI with univariate P value <0.1 (age, atrial fibrillation, LVEF <35%, COPD and peripheral vascular disease). Variables were presented in model 0 if their multivariate P value was <0.05 (age, LVEF <35% and COPD). We included each biomarker one after another (models 1 through 3) into multivariate regression analysis to exclude interaction.

Correlation of urine and plasma hepcidin levels

At baseline, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine correlated well with plasma hepcidin (r = 0.76, P < 0.001). We found a good correlation between postoperative plasma hepcidin and urine hepcidin in patients not developing AKI (six hours after CPB: r = 0.62, P < 0.001), but no correlation in those with subsequent AKI (six hours after CPB: r = 0.18, P = 0.64).

Urine/plasma hepcidin ratio and fractional excretion of hepcidin

In AKI-free patients, a urine/plasma hepcidin ratio >1 was observed, which increased from 2.6 to 6.9 over time (Table 3). Patients developing AKI, however, presented with a urine/plasma hepcidin ratio around 1.0, which remained stable over time (Table 3). Overall, the highest FE of hepcidin was detected at six hours after commencement of CPB. However, the FE of hepcidin was about three times higher in those not developing AKI (Table 3).

Influence of exclusion of patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease

The findings at baseline and interventions and outcomes remained essentially unchanged after patients with preoperative CKD were excluded from the analyses (Tables 1 and 2). The magnitude of urine and plasma hepcidin concentrations and the increase over time or the predictive values of hepcidin did not differ significantly between patients with or without CKD (Table 6). Also, of note, preoperative urine and plasma hepcidin levels or the urine/plasma hepcidin ratio did not correlate with preoperative eGFR (all r < 0.2, all P > 0.1) (Table 7).
Table 6

Predictive values of biomarkers for ruling out AKI excluding patients with preoperative CKDa

Biomarkers

AUC-ROC (95% CI)

Sensitivity

Specificity

Cutoff

Urine hepcidin, ng/mL

    

   6 hours after CPB start

0.81 (0.67 to 0.96)

62.30%

100.00%

>545

   24 hours after CPB start

0.83 (0.74 to 0.92)

79.70%

100.00%

>475

Urine hepcidin/urine creatinine, ng/mg

    

   6 hours after CPB start

0.87 (0.75 to 0.99)

70.00%

100.00%

>2820

   24 hours after CPB start

0.75 (0.57 to 0.94)

76.50%

80.00%

>1,762

Plasma hepcidin, ng/mL

    

   6 hours after CPB start

0.70 (0.46 to 0.98)

69.00%

80.00%

>175

   24 hours after CPB start

0.54 (0.23 to 0.86)

N/A

N/A

N/A

aAKI, acute kidney injury; AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CPB; cardiopulmonary bypass; N/A, values not presented for AUC-ROC <0.6. AKI is defined as Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease classification of AKI (RIFLE) class R or worse including serum creatinine increase and urine output decrease.

Table 7

Correlation coefficients of hepcidin with preoperative eGFRa

Baseline variables

Spearman's ρ

Preoperative eGFR

Urine hepcidin

Correlation coefficient

0.15

 

Significance (two-sided)

0.15

 

Number of patients

100

Urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine

Correlation coefficient

0.07

 

Significance (two-sided)

0.51

 

Number of patients

100

Plasma hepcidin

Correlation coefficient

0.043

 

Significance (two-sided)

0.67

 

Number of patients

100

Urine/plasma hepcidin ratio

Correlation coefficient

0.16

 

Significance (two-sided)

0.11

 

Number of patients

100

aeGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Discussion

Key findings

In a control cohort recruited to participate in an interventional study of AKI after CPB, we found that higher urine hepcidin concentrations determined early postoperatively were associated with ruling out AKI, whereas postoperative hepcidin remained at preoperative levels in patients with subsequent AKI. Furthermore, early postoperative urine hepcidin levels and, even more so, urine hepcidin adjusted to urine creatinine discriminated patients not developing AKI or not requiring RRT initiation from those who did, although the event rate was low. Early postoperative urine hepcidin levels adjusted to urine creatinine were also independent predictors of ruling out AKI. On the other hand, plasma hepcidin levels and serum creatinine determined early postoperatively were not associated with not developing AKI after cardiac surgery. The study findings remained essentially unchanged after excluding patients with preoperative CKD. Preoperative values of urine hepcidin correlated with plasma hepcidin levels; however, postoperatively, this correlation was present only in patients not developing AKI. In patients with AKI, postoperative urine hepcidin concentrations were three to seven times lower than those in patients without AKI and similar to plasma hepcidin levels.

Relation to previous studies

The incidence of AKI in our patient cohort was similar to that recently described by Argalious et al.[24] but lower than that previously reported by Haase et al.[25] in an Australian cohort. A multitude of studies have investigated hepcidin in a number of nonrenal diseases, for example, as a marker of anemia [2628], but also in CKD [29, 30]. Hepcidin is a peptide hormone synthesized in hepatocytes and is detected in the normal kidney, heart and brain [31, 32]. Hepcidin is centrally involved in iron homeostasis, and its synthesis is increased under inflammatory conditions via interleukin 6. On the other hand, its synthesis is reduced in the setting of hypoxia [11, 26, 28, 33, 34].

In the kidney, systemic hepcidin is filtered through the glomerulus, partly reabsorbed into the proximal tubules and converted to active hepcidin-25 in situ[14]. Within the kidney, hepcidin is expressed in the apical tubular epithelium of the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle [13]. Preoperative serum hepcidin concentrations were similar to those reported in five cardiac surgery patients [35] as well as in healthy adults [20]. Also, in a previous study, urine hepcidin levels adjusted to urine creatinine and plasma hepcidin concentrations correlated well in healthy individuals [20], as seen preoperatively in our cohort.

Using mass spectroscopy, Ho et al.[14] detected a urine hepcidin peak with increased frequency and intensity on the first postoperative day in patients with a postoperative serum creatinine increase <10% from baseline to peak compared to patients with AKI. This hypothesis-generating approach maximized the likelihood of detecting a signal but may not be generalized to consecutive patients. Also, hepcidin assays based on mass spectroscopy techniques [36] are semiquantitative and depend on expensive equipment that is not widely available. Therefore, the authors suggested that quantification of hepcidin in both plasma and urine samples in consecutive patients would be necessary to elucidate the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of hepcidin for AKI after cardiopulmonary bypass [37]. None of the studies reported the quantitative measurement of plasma and urine hepcidin levels as renal biomarkers in patients at risk of AKI after CPB. Our findings are consistent with those reported by Ho et al.[14]. By contrast, our results deviate from those observed in a small patient cohort [38] describing no association between postoperative fractional excretion of hepcidin and AKI on the first postoperative day.

Significance of study findings

As a low-molecular-weight peptide (2.78 kDa), hepcidin would be expected to pass unimpeded into the glomerular ultrafiltrate with a sieving coefficient of 1. However, at baseline, we found a low fractional excretion of hepcidin, implying significant tubular reabsorption and/or catabolism of hepcidin along the nephron. Markedly increased postoperative fractional excretion of hepcidin (10-fold) in patients not developing AKI may point toward (1) relatively preserved filtration, (2) reduced or saturated reabsorption, (3) increased active secretion and (4) increased local synthesis of hepcidin along the nephron [13], or any combination of these factors. Many studies [3941] have suggested that there is tubular injury with CPB [3]. Thus one might expect that reduced hepcidin absorption alone would be greater in patients who subsequently develop AKI, resulting in higher urine hepcidin concentrations. The fact that the opposite occurs makes this mechanism less likely. As active hepcidin secretion has not been demonstrated previously, this mechanism also seems less likely. Relatively preserved filtration in the setting of a simultaneous decrease in reabsorption, however, seems possible and more likely. Decreased reabsorption would explain an increase in urine hepcidin levels for all patients. Later on, relatively preserved filtration (reflecting better GFR) would be expected to further elevate urine hepcidin concentrations in recovering patients and thereby identify those at lower risk of subsequent AKI.

Loss of integrity of tubular tight junctions with tubular backleak of urine hepcidin would explain a postoperative increase in plasma concentrations in patients developing AKI, but not its observed low magnitude. Also, one would expect hepcidin and creatinine to backleak equally, unless hepcidin was then sequestered or less was delivered downstream. Finally, the additional role of local hepcidin release remains unknown, and upregulation of tubular hepcidin [13], as is the case for lipocalin 2 [42], may be an adaptive response to injury. Hepcidin-mediated intracellular iron sequestration may act to limit ischemia-reperfusion injury in a manner analogous to exogenous deferoxamine administration [14]. Irrespective of the underlying mechanisms, measurement of urine hepcidin concentrations, combined with measurements of one or more other biomarkers (that is, lipocalin 2), may provide additional information for the early identification of individuals who will or will not develop AKI.

Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to describe in detail the relationship between urine and plasma hepcidin and AKI in humans after CPB. We used a novel competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay for human hepcidin [20] which accurately and reproducibly detects physiologic and pathologic changes in plasma or urine hepcidin levels. We simultaneously measured both plasma and urine hepcidin levels to elucidate whether there is an interrelationship between them.

However, we focused on a single renal biomarker (hepcidin) involved in complex traits of iron metabolism. Our findings are limited to a single-center study, and center-specific effects cannot be excluded. Although in our study the event rate was low, the findings were consistent with those of a previous publication [14] and with those of another independent observational study [43]. Our study appears to be underpowered for the detection of a preoperative difference in hepcidin levels. AKI after CPB has specific etiopathologic factors, and these findings may not be generalized to AKI in other contexts. Furthermore, proof of association does not imply that hepcidin is causatively involved in the pathogenesis of or response to AKI after CPB.

Future studies

Our study findings suggest the need to investigate the role and source of urine hepcidin in the pathophysiology of AKI after cardiac surgery using CPB. Such investigations may encompass interventions such as the modulation of iron release and disposal during CPB. In addition, it now seems desirable to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic values of hepcidin in other forms of AKI as well as the combined diagnostic and prognostic value of hepcidin in conjunction with other biomarkers.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that early postoperative urine hepcidin determination has additive value in ruling out AKI after CPB, thereby potentially helping to triage patients. The nature of this association, the central biological role of hepcidin in iron metabolism and the possible importance of iron in the pathogenesis of CPB-associated AKI, taken together, identify hepcidin as an interesting subject for future research in this context.

Key messages

  • Cardiopulmonary bypass increases plasma and urine hepcidin levels.

  • The increase in urinary hepcidin levels is greater in patients who do not develop AKI.

  • Urine hepcidin has additive value in ruling out acute kidney injury in patients after cardiac surgery.

  • Urine hepcidin is predictive of not needing postoperative RRT.

  • Plasma hepcidin does not rule out the development of acute kidney injury.

Abbreviations

AKI: 

acute kidney injury, AUC: area under the curve

CKD: 

chronic kidney disease

CPB: 

cardiopulmonary bypass

FE: 

fractional excretion

RIFLE: 

Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease classification of AKI

RRT: 

renal replacement therapy

ROC: 

receiver operating characteristic.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Argid Rutenberg and Raimund Rutenberg for their excellent research assistance. This study was supported by grants from the German Heart Foundation (Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung) and from the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Germany.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension & Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Leipziger Strasse 44, Magdeburg, D-39120, Germany
(2)
Institute of Anesthesiology, German Heart Center, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, D-39120, Germany
(3)
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, German Heart Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, D-13353, Germany
(4)
Intrinsic LifeSciences LLC, German Heart Center, Suite 102, 505 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
(5)
Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, German Heart Center, Studley Road, Melbourne, Heidelberg, CA, 3084, Australia

References

  1. Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW: Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005, 16: 3365-3370. 10.1681/ASN.2004090740PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Macedo E, Gibney N, Tolwani A, Ronco C, Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney) Investigators: Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA 2005, 294: 813-818. 10.1001/jama.294.7.813PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rosner MH, Okusa MD: Acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006, 1: 19-32. 10.2215/CJN.01420406PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mishra J, Dent C, Tarabishi R, Mitsnefes MM, Ma Q, Kelly C, Ruff SM, Zahedi K, Shao M, Bean J, Mori K, Barasch J, Devarajan P: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. Lancet 2005, 365: 1231-1238. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74811-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Koyner JL, Vaidya VS, Bennett MR, Ma Q, Worcester E, Akhter SA, Raman J, Jeevanandam V, O'Connor MF, Devarajan P, Bonventre JV, Murray PT: Urinary biomarkers in the clinical prognosis and early detection of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010, 5: 2154-2165. 10.2215/CJN.00740110PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Haase-Fielitz A, Bellomo R, Devarajan P, Story D, Matalanis G, Dragun D, Haase M: Novel and conventional serum biomarkers predicting acute kidney injury in adult cardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 2009, 37: 553-560. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318195846ePubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mishra J, Ma Q, Prada A, Mitsnefes M, Zahedi K, Yang J, Barasch J, Devarajan P: Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel early urinary biomarker for ischemic renal injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003, 14: 2534-2543. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000088027.54400.C6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Devarajan P, Mishra J, Supavekin S, Patterson LT, Potter SS: Gene expression in early ischemic renal injury: clues towards pathogenesis, biomarker discovery, and novel therapeutics. Mol Genet Metab 2003, 80: 365-376. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2003.09.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith MP, Banks RE, Wood SL, Lewington AJ, Selby PJ: Application of proteomic analysis to the study of renal diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol 2009, 5: 701-712. 10.1038/nrneph.2009.183PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganz T: Molecular control of iron transport. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 18: 394-400. 10.1681/ASN.2006070802PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pigeon C, Ilyin G, Courselaud B, Leroyer P, Turlin B, Brissot P, Loréal O: A new mouse liver-specific gene, encoding a protein homologous to human antimicrobial peptide hepcidin, is overexpressed during iron overload. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 7811-7819. 10.1074/jbc.M008923200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hunter HN, Fulton DB, Ganz T, Vogel HJ: The solution structure of human hepcidin, a peptide hormone with antimicrobial activity that is involved in iron uptake and hereditary hemochromatosis. J Biol Chem 2002, 277: 37597-37603. 10.1074/jbc.M205305200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kulaksiz H, Theilig F, Bachmann S, Gehrke SG, Rost D, Janetzko A, Cetin Y, Stremmel W: The iron-regulatory peptide hormone hepcidin: expression and cellular localization in the mammalian kidney. J Endocrinol 2005, 184: 361-370. 10.1677/joe.1.05729PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ho J, Lucy M, Krokhin O, Hayglass K, Pascoe E, Darroch G, Rush D, Nickerson P, Rigatto C, Reslerova M: Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of urine in acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass: a nested case-control study. Am J Kidney Dis 2009, 53: 584-595. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.10.037PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, De Zeeuw D, Hostetter TH, Lameire N, Eknoyan G: Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005, 67: 2089-2100. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Marsh J, Stevens LA, Kusek JW, Van Lente F, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration: Expressing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem 2007, 53: 766-772. 10.1373/clinchem.2006.077180PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P, Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup: Acute renal failure: definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs. The Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 2004, 8: R204-R212. 10.1186/cc2872PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Englberger L, Suri RM, Li Z, Casey ET, Daly RC, Dearani JA, Schaff HV: Clinical accuracy of RIFLE and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Crit Care 2011, 15: R16. 10.1186/cc9960PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007, 370: 1453-1457. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ganz T, Olbina G, Girelli D, Nemeth E, Westerman M: Immunoassay for human serum hepcidin. Blood 2008, 112: 4292-4297. 10.1182/blood-2008-02-139915PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Swets JA: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240: 1285-1293. 10.1126/science.3287615PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Youden WJ: Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950, 3: 32-35. 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS: Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008, 27: 157-172. 10.1002/sim.2929PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Argalious M, Xu M, Sun Z, Smedira N, Koch CG: Preoperative statin therapy is not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2010, 111: 324-330. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d8a078PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Haase M, Haase-Fielitz A, Bellomo R, Devarajan P, Story D, Matalanis G, Reade MC, Bagshaw SM, Seevanayagam N, Seevanayagam S, Doolan L, Buxton B, Dragun D: Sodium bicarbonate to prevent increases in serum creatinine after cardiac surgery: a pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2009, 37: 39-47. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318193216fPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. van Eijk LT, Kroot JJ, Tromp M, van der Hoeven JG, Swinkels DW, Pickkers P: Inflammation-induced hepcidin-25 is associated with the development of anemia in septic patients: an observational study. Crit Care 2011, 15: R9. 10.1186/cc9408PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gardenghi S, Ramos P, Marongiu MF, Melchiori L, Breda L, Guy E, Muirhead K, Rao N, Roy CN, Andrews NC, Nemeth E, Follenzi A, An X, Mohandas N, Ginzburg Y, Rachmilewitz EA, Giardina PJ, Grady RW, Rivella S: Hepcidin as a therapeutic tool to limit iron overload and improve anemia in β-thalassemic mice. J Clin Invest 2010, 120: 4466-4477. 10.1172/JCI41717PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nemeth E, Valore EV, Territo M, Schiller G, Lichtenstein A, Ganz T: Hepcidin, a putative mediator of anemia of inflammation, is a type II acute-phase protein. Blood 2003, 101: 2461-2463. 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3235PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kato A, Tsuji T, Luo J, Sakao Y, Yasuda H, Hishida A: Association of prohepcidin and hepcidin-25 with erythropoietin response and ferritin in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 2008, 28: 115-121. 10.1159/000109968PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zaritsky J, Young B, Wang HJ, Westerman M, Olbina G, Nemeth E, Ganz T, Rivera S, Nissenson AR, Salusky IB: Hepcidin: a potential novel biomarker for iron status in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009, 4: 1051-1056. 10.2215/CJN.05931108PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Park CH, Valore EV, Waring AJ, Ganz T: Hepcidin, a urinary antimicrobial peptide synthesized in the liver. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 7806-7810. 10.1074/jbc.M008922200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hamada Y, Fukagawa M: Is hepcidin the star player in iron metabolism in chronic kidney disease? Kidney Int 2009, 75: 873-874. 10.1038/ki.2009.46PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicolas G, Chauvet C, Viatte L, Danan JL, Bigard X, Devaux I, Beaumont C, Kahn A, Vaulont S: The gene encoding the iron regulatory peptide hepcidin is regulated by anemia, hypoxia, and inflammation. J Clin Invest 2002, 110: 1037-1044.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Piperno A, Galimberti S, Mariani R, Pelucchi S, Ravasi G, Lombardi C, Bilo G, Revera M, Giuliano A, Faini A, Mainini V, Westerman M, Ganz T, Valsecchi MG, Mancia G, Parati G, HIGHCARE investigators: Modulation of hepcidin production during hypoxia-induced erythropoiesis in humans in vivo: data from the HIGHCARE project. Blood 2011, 117: 2953-2959. 10.1182/blood-2010-08-299859PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoppe M, Lönnerdal B, Hossain B, Olsson S, Nilsson F, Lundberg PA, Rödjer S, Hulthén L: Hepcidin, interleukin-6 and hematological iron markers in males before and after heart surgery. J Nutr Biochem 2009, 20: 11-16. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.11.008PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kemna E, Tjalsma H, Laarakkers C, Nemeth E, Willems H, Swinkels D: Novel urine hepcidin assay by mass spectrometry. Blood 2005, 106: 3268-3270. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1873PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Reslerova M, Rigatto C: In reply to 'Hepcidin levels in acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass grafting'. Am J Kidney Dis 2009, 54: 980.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Laarakkers CM, Wetzels JF, Swinkels DW: Hepcidin levels in acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass grafting. Am J Kidney Dis 2009, 54: 979-980. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.045PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Huybregts RA, Morariu AM, Rakhorst G, Spiegelenberg SR, Romijn HW, de Vroege R, van Oeveren W: Attenuated renal and intestinal injury after use of a mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system. Ann Thorac Surg 2007, 83: 1760-1766. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.016PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Tang AT, Knott J, Nanson J, Hsu J, Haw MP, Ohri SK: A prospective randomized study to evaluate the renoprotective action of beating heart coronary surgery in low risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002, 22: 118-123. 10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00220-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Loef BG, Epema AH, Navis G, Ebels T, van Oeveren W, Henning RH: Off-pump coronary revascularization attenuates transient renal damage compared with on-pump coronary revascularization. Chest 2002, 121: 1190-1194. 10.1378/chest.121.4.1190PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Mori K, Lee HT, Rapoport D, Drexler IR, Foster K, Yang J, Schmidt-Ott KM, Chen X, Li JY, Weiss S, Mishra J, Cheema FH, Markowitz G, Suganami T, Sawai K, Mukoyama M, Kunis C, D'Agati V, Devarajan P, Barasch J: Endocytic delivery of lipocalin-siderophore-iron complex rescues the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest 2005, 115: 610-621.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Prowle JR, Ostland V, Calzavacca P, Licari E, Ligabo EV, Echeverri JE, Bagshaw SM, Haase-Fielitz A, Haase M, Westerman M, Bellomo R: Greater increase in urinary hepcidin predicts protection from acute kidney injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. Nephrol Dial Transpl, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement