Open Access

Markers of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis: the role of soluble thrombomodulin

Critical Care201721:229

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1815-x

Received: 30 May 2017

Accepted: 8 August 2017

Published: 25 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Endothelial activation and damage occur early during sepsis, with activated coagulopathy and playing a major role in the pathophysiology of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of this study was to compare the various biomarkers of endothelial injury with the biomarkers of coagulation and inflammation and to determine a significant predictor of AKI in patients with sepsis.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study on patients with sepsis fulfilling the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria admitted to an adult intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital from June 2011 to December 2016. Levels of 13 biomarkers were measured on ICU admission, including markers of endothelial injury (soluble thrombomodulin [sTM], E-selectin, protein C, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1]) and markers of coagulation derangement (platelet count, fibrin degradation product [FDP], prothrombin time [PT], fibrinogen, α2-plasminogen inhibitor [α2-PI], antithrombin III [AT III], plasminogen, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex). All patients with sepsis were reviewed, and the development of AKI was evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant independent predictive factors for AKI.

Results

Of the 514 patients admitted with sepsis, 351 (68.3%) developed AKI. Compared with the non-AKI group, all the endothelial biomarkers were significantly different in the AKI group (sTM [23.6 vs. 15.6 U/ml, P < 0.0001], E-selectin [65.5 vs. 46.2 ng/ml, P = 0.0497], PAI-1 [180.4 vs. 75.3 ng/ml, P = 0.018], and protein C [45.9 vs. 58.7 ng/ml, P < 0.0001]). Biomarkers of coagulopathy and inflammation, platelet counts, FDP, PT, α2-PI, AT III, plasminogen, and C-reactive protein were significantly different between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that sTM was an independent predictive factor of AKI, with an AUROC of 0.758 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Endothelial biomarkers were significantly changed in the sepsis patients with AKI. Particularly, sTM was an independent predictive biomarker for the development of AKI that outperformed other coagulation and inflammation biomarkers as well as organ function in patients with sepsis.

Keywords

Acute kidney injuryEndothelial injuryE-selectinSepsisSoluble thrombomodulinPlasminogen activator inhibitor-1Protein C

Background

Sepsis represents a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an aberrant or dysregulated host response to infection [1]. In particular, acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent types of organ dysfunction that typically appears early in the course of sepsis. Nearly half of the patients develop AKI in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, and the presence of AKI in these patients leads to an increase in mortality up to 30–50% [24].

The high mortality rate associated with septic AKI may partially be explained by an incomplete understanding of its pathophysiology and a delay in diagnosis. Currently, the diagnosis of AKI is based on either an elevation of serum creatinine levels or the detection of oliguria [5]. These criteria, however, are not specific with respect to the etiology or pathophysiological mechanisms of AKI and have limited sensitivity and specificity for the early recognition of renal dysfunction. The introduction of new biomarkers that are related to the underlying pathogenesis of AKI may allow earlier diagnosis and better prognostication of the clinical course in patients with sepsis.

Endothelial injury is a key feature of sepsis, and the activation and damage of endothelial cells are closely linked with organ dysfunction [6, 7]. Previous studies highlighted systemic hypotension and ischemia-reperfusion injury as the primary pathophysiology involved in septic AKI. Recently, however, it has been shown that septic AKI occurs in the setting of microvascular dysfunction, which is altered by endothelial injury [810]. In addition to their role in controlling vasoconstriction/vasodilation and vascular permeability, endothelial cells are essential for maintaining the balance between coagulation and anticoagulation, and they play a prominent role in all three major pathogenic pathways associated with coagulopathy in sepsis: increased tissue factor-mediated thrombin generation; dysfunction of antithrombin and the thrombomodulin-protein C anticoagulant system; and blocked fibrinolysis, which is induced by increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression. During sepsis, exposure to inflammatory mediators and interaction with immune cells causes endothelial activation. The activated or injured endothelial cells exert enhanced procoagulatory activities, which contribute to the formation of a large number of microthrombi, leading to microcirculatory failure [6, 11]. Therefore, markers that reflect endothelial injury and its associated coagulopathy could potentially predict the development of AKI and may play a role in promoting clinical research for underlying mechanisms.

To date, several biomarkers of endothelial injury have been evaluated regarding their association with AKI, such as endothelium-derived markers (e.g., thrombomodulin, PAI-1, E-selectin) and markers activated by endothelial cells (e.g., protein C) [1217]. Most studies, however, were relatively small, conducted in the critical care setting, not focused on sepsis-induced AKI. Also, endothelial function is closely related to coagulopathy; however, there have been few studies in which this relationship has been evaluated. Finally, it remains unclear whether biomarkers of endothelial injury can predict the development of AKI in patients with sepsis.

We report our comparisons of various biomarkers of endothelial injury as predictors of AKI among 514 eligible patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU over a 5-year study period. We also evaluated biomarkers of coagulopathy, parameters of inflammation and organ function, and parameters of endothelial injury to compare their discriminative power in AKI prediction.

Methods

Study design and setting

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study conducted in a 14-bed general ICU of a university hospital (Tochigi, Japan) from June 2011 to December 2016. Laboratory tests, including those for measuring levels of biomarkers of endothelial injury and coagulopathy, were routinely performed at our institute and were partly used for published data [18]. Clinical decisions were made at the discretion of attending ICU physicians. The study protocol was approved by the institutional research ethics committee of Jichi Medical University Hospital. Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study.

Participants

Patients were eligible for enrollment if they were aged 20 years or older and had sepsis at the time of ICU admission. Patients in whom levels of one of the endothelial biomarkers was measured were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis, missing laboratory data on the day of ICU admission, or missing records of hourly urinary output or body weight, which are necessary for the diagnosis of AKI. The prothrombin time (PT) was excluded from the biomarkers of coagulopathy in patients for whom warfarin had been prescribed for any reason. Patient baseline data, including age, sex, body weight, site of infection, and premorbid creatinine level, were collected from electronic medical records. Underlying medical history was also obtained, including ischemic heart disease, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular accident, diabetes mellitus, or immunocompromised state. Immunocompromised patients were defined as individuals who had been prescribed any immunosuppressive agent. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score [19] and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score without the renal system parameter (nonrenal SOFA) [20] were used for assessment of illness severity. All patients were reviewed for the development of AKI during the first 48 h of their ICU stay and for the presence of septic shock, overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), requirement for mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 28 and 90 days.

Definitions

We defined AKI according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria [5] using an increase in serum creatinine level ≥ 0.3 mg/dl (≥26.5 μmol/L) within 48 h or an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 times of baseline within 7 days, which corresponds to stage 1 of the KDIGO classification. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/minute/1.73 m2 [21] using baseline creatinine. To define the baseline creatinine level, we used a stable value within 1 year before hospital admission as premorbid creatinine. If the baseline creatinine level was not available, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation was used to assume a baseline eGFR of 75 ml/minute/1.73 m2 [22]. Sepsis and septic shock were defined according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock [1]. Overt DIC was defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [23].

Biomarker measurement and laboratory analysis

Thirteen biomarkers of endothelial injury (soluble thrombomodulin [sTM], PAI-1, protein C, and E-selectin) and coagulation derangement (platelet count, fibrin degradation product [FDP], PT, fibrinogen, α2-plasminogen inhibitor [α2-PI], antithrombin III [AT III], plasminogen, thrombin-antithrombin complex [TAT], plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex [PIC]) were measured on ICU admission. sTM concentration was determined using the STACIA chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay with reagent (LSI Medience, Tokyo, Japan). The levels of PAI-1 and E-selectin were measured using tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor and sES latex photometric immunoassays, respectively (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience, Tokyo, Japan). Berichrom® assays (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan) were used to determine the activities of protein C, AT III, plasminogen, and α2-PI. TAT and PIC F enzyme immunoassays (Sysmex, Hyogo, Japan) were used for measurement of TAT and PIC levels, respectively. Blood coagulation, including those for platelet count, PT, FDP, and fibrinogen, was assayed using the CS-2100i automatic coagulation analyzer (Sysmex). We also measured the following inflammatory and biochemistry parameters on the day of ICU admission: C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, albumin, total bilirubin, lactate, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and serum cystatin C.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were compared between the two groups using the chi-square test. To determine factors relevant for predicting AKI, we conducted multivariate logistic regression analysis with AKI as the dependent variable and evaluated unadjusted and adjusted ORs. In this analysis, we used model 1 (endothelial biomarkers [sTM and protein C], all coagulation biomarkers including overt DIC, and inflammation parameters [WBC and CRP]) and model 2 (endothelial biomarkers, all coagulation biomarkers including overt DIC, inflammation parameters, organ function [APACHE II, baseline creatinine, BNP, nonrenal SOFA, albumin, total bilirubin, hemoglobin, and presence of septic shock], age, and presence of hypertension) to calculate the adjusted OR. A forward stepwise elimination process was used to remove insignificant variables by each model. The ability of biomarkers to predict AKI was assessed using the AUROC [24]. All analyses were performed using JMP 13 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Data are presented as medians and IQRs (25th–75th percentiles) or percentages. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Enrollment and baseline characteristics

There were 5764 patients considered for participation during the study period. Among these, 651 patients presented with sepsis. Among the patients who were excluded, 50 had received dialysis because of end-stage renal failure, 5 had omission of hourly urinary output or body weight, and 82 had omission of laboratory data on the day of ICU admission. In total, 514 patients were included and divided into the AKI (n = 351) and non-AKI (n = 163) groups (Table 1). In the AKI group compared with the non-AKI group, age was significantly older (71 vs. 65 years, P = 0.003); APACHE II score was significantly higher (26 vs. 19, P < 0.0001); and CKD was significantly more common (31.1% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.032). Mechanical ventilation was significantly higher (85.8% vs. 76.7%, P = 0.011) in the AKI group. The 28-day (15.6% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.0001) and 90-day (24.5% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.0001) mortality rates were also significantly higher in the AKI group than in the non-AKI group.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population

 

All (n = 514)

AKI (n = 163)

Non-AKI (n = 351)

P value

Age, years

69 (59–78)

65 (56–74)

71 (61–79)

0.0003

BW, kg

56.7 (48–66)

55 (46–64)

57 (49–67)

0.336

Height, cm

159 (151–166)

159 (152–166)

160 (150–166)

0.823

Male sex

53.9%

53.4%

54.1%

0.873

APACHE II

24 (18–30)

19 (15–25)

26 (20–31)

<0.0001

CKD

28.0%

21.5%

31.1%

0.032

Premorbid creatinine, μmol/L

66.3 (53.0–84.9)

61.9 (47.7–80.0)

70.3 (53.9–89.5)

0.007

 Premorbid creatinine, mg/dl

0.75 (0.60–0.96)

0.70 (0.54–0.91)

0.80 (0.0.61–1.01)

0.007

Baseline creatinine, μmol/L

54.8 (50.9–71.6)

55.1 (51.3–65.4)

54.8 (50.8–72.5)

0.011

 Baseline creatinine, mg/dl

0.62 (0.58–0.81)

0.62 (0.58–0.74)

0.62 (0.57–0.82)

0.011

Hypertension

48.8%

39.3%

53.3%

0.003

IHD

8.8%

5.5%

10.3%

0.077

CHF

8.8%

4.9%

10.5%

0.036

COPD

5.1%

7.4%

4.0%

0.104

CVA

11.1%

8.6%

12.3%

0.219

DM

25.7%

21.5%

27.6%

0.137

Immunocompromised

29.2%

27.6%

29.9%

0.592

Infection site

   

0.013

 Intracranial

1.2%

2.5%

0.6%

 

 Head and neck

5.5%

9.2%

3.7%

 

 Thoracic

22.4%

22.1%

22.5%

 

 Abdominal

50.8%

53.4%

49.6%

 

 Soft tissue

6.0%

4.9%

6.6%

 

 CR-BSI

1.0%

0.0%

1.4%

 

 UTI

5.3%

3.7%

6.0%

 

 Others

8.0%

4.3%

10.3%

 

Mechanical ventilation

82.9%

76.7%

85.8%

0.011

28-day mortality

11.7%

3.1%

15.6%

<0.0001

90-day mortality

19.3%

8.4%

24.5%

<0.0001

Abbreviations: AKI Acute kidney injury, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, BMI Body mass index, BW Body weight, CHD Chronic heart disease, CKD Chronic kidney disease, COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CR-BSI Catheter-related bloodstream infection, CVA Cerebrovascular accident, DM Diabetes mellitus, IHD Ischemic heart disease, UTI Urinary tract infection

Laboratory tests and endothelial biomarkers in AKI and non-AKI groups

Table 2 shows the measured variables between the two groups. Among the endothelial biomarkers, sTM (23.6 vs. 15.6 U/ml, P < 0.0001) and E-selectin (65.5 vs. 46.2 ng/ml, P = 0.0497) levels were both significantly higher in patients with AKI than in those without AKI. Also, protein C activity (45.9% vs. 58.7%, P < 0.0001) was significantly lower, and the level of PAI-1 (180.4 vs. 75.3 ng/ml, P = 0.018) was significantly higher, in the AKI group. As for parameters of inflammation and organ function, the following were all significantly different in the AKI group compared with in the non-AKI group: CRP, BUN, serum creatinine, cystatin C, BNP, albumin, hemoglobin, lactate, the proportion of patients with septic shock, nonrenal SOFA score, and number of overt DIC cases. As for the coagulation biomarkers, platelet count, PT, FDP, AT III, plasminogen, and α2-PI were significantly different for patients in the AKI group compared with in the non-AKI group. In addition, each variable for biomarkers of endothelial injury and coagulopathy was analyzed using AUROC (Table 3). The AUROC values for sTM, E-selectin, protein C, and PAI-1 as predictive factors were 0.758 (0.677–0.825), 0.629 (0.492–0.748), 0.634 (0.581–0.685), and 0.669 (0.566–0.758), respectively.
Table 2

Laboratory tests and endothelial biomarkers

 

All (n = 514)

Non-AKI (n = 163)

AKI (n = 351)

P value

Laboratory tests

 WBC, 109/L

9.9 (4.2–15.0)

9.5 (5.0–14.2)

10.1 (3.7–15.2)

0.255

 Hb, g/L

105 (89–121)

107 (93–122)

104 (86–120)

0.023

 CRP, mg/L

128 (62–225)

105 (41–186)

137 (70–242)

0.002

 Alb, g/L

24 (20–28)

24 (21–28)

23 (19–28)

0.013

 T-Bil, μmol/L

15.2 (10.8–24.8)

15.6 (11.1–23.8)

15.0 (10.6–25.8)

0.395

 Lactate, mmol/L

2.2 (1.4–3.7)

1.9 (1.2–2.7)

2.5 (1.5–4.6)

<0.0001

 BNP, ng/L

136.7 (50.6–395.1)

70.2 (29.8–204.8)

175.0 (68.1–522.7)

0.0003

Renal parameters

 BUN, mmol/L

8.9 (5.4–14.6)

5.4 (3.9–7.9)

11.4 (7.5–16.6)

<0.0001

 Creatinine, μmol/L

89.7 (61.0–162.9)

57.5 (47.7–69.0)

127.3 (84.9–206.9)

<0.0001

 Creatinine, mg/dl

1.02 (0.69–1.84)

0.65 (0.54–0.78)

1.44 (0.96–2.34)

<0.0001

 Cystatin C, mg/L

1.29 (0.91–2.02)

0.86 (0.72–1.03)

1.65 (1.14–2.29)

<0.0001

Coagulation biomarkers

 Platelets, 109/L

144 (91–207)

167 (127–238)

131 (78–193)

<0.0001

 FDP, mg/L

16.7 (10.0–27.6)

13.6 (8.9–21.7)

18.9 (10.9–30.5)

0.049

 PT, %

56.4 (44.3–70.3)

63.3 (50.3–75.8)

52.4 (42.5–67.6)

<0.0001

 Fib, mg/dl

343 (242–487)

373 (261–528)

333 (234–471)

0.076

 α2-PI, %

75.2 (57.9–97.2)

82.0 (63.3–102.0)

73.6 (56.9–94.0)

0.029

 AT III, %

53.7 (41.9–69.0)

60.4 (45.5–76.3)

51.5 (39.3–63.0)

<0.0001

 Plasminogen, %

61.4 (46.2–80.3)

66.9 (52.9–88.8)

59.7 (43.6–77.6)

0.0002

 TAT, ng/ml

11.1 (6.2–20.0)

9.2 (5.4–16.7)

12.4 (6.7–21.5)

0.088

 PIC, μg/ml

1.3 (0.8–2.1)

1.2 (0.8–1.9)

1.3 (0.8–2.2)

0.613

Endothelial activation

 Protein C, %

49.6 (36.3–66.4)

58.7 (44.2–74.0)

45.9 (33.6–63.6)

<0.0001

 sTM, U/ml

21.1 (15.4–31.5)

15.6 (12.6–20.5)

23.6 (17.0–38.8)

<0.0001

 E-selectin, ng/ml

55.2 (36.2–98.2)

46.2 (32.3–67.5)

65.5 (40.2–131.0)

0.0497

 PAI-1, ng/ml

116.3 (53.8–290.8)

75.3 (40.3–150.7)

180.4 (68.0–519.1)

0.018

Other definitions

 No renal SOFA

6 (4–9)

5 (3–7)

7 (5–9)

<0.0001

 Overt DIC

24.5%

10.1%

31.6%

<0.0001

 Septic shock

45.7%

29.5%

53.3%

<0.0001

Abbreviations: AKI Acute kidney injury, Alb Albumin, AT III Antithrombin III, BNP Brain natriuretic peptide, BUN Blood urea nitrogen, CRP C-reactive protein, DIC Disseminated intravascular coagulation, FDP Fibrin degradation product, Hb Hemoglobin, PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, α 2 -PI α2-Plasminogen inhibitor, PIC Plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex, PT Prothrombin time, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, sTM Soluble thrombomodulin, TAT Thrombin-antithrombin complex, T-Bil Total bilirubin, WBC White blood cell

Table 3

AUROCs for predictors of acute kidney injury in sepsis

 

AUROC (95% CI)

Coagulation biomarkers

 Platelet

0.627 (0.576–0.675)

 FDP

0.614 (0.562–0.663)

 PT

0.629 (0.576–0.680)

 Fib

0.549 (0.494–0.602)

 α2-PI

0.564 (0.509–0.618)

 AT III

0.618 (0.564–0.670)

 Plasminogen

0.600 (0.545–0.652)

 TAT

0.591 (0.538–0.642)

 PIC

0.527 (0.475–0.579)

 Overt DIC

0.607 (0.572–0.641)

Endothelial activation

 Protein C

0.634 (0.581–0.685)

 sTM

0.758 (0.677–0.825)

 E-selectin

0.629 (0.492–0.748)

 PAI-1

0.669 (0.566–0.758)

Abbreviations: AKI Acute kidney injury, AT III Antithrombin III, DIC Disseminated intravascular coagulation, FDP Fibrin degradation product, PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, α 2 PI α2-Plasminogen inhibitor, PIC Plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex, PT Prothrombin time, sTM Soluble thrombomodulin, TAT Thrombin-antithrombin complex

Multivariate analysis to identify factors predictive of AKI

To identify the predictable factors of AKI, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis using model 1 and model 2. In both models, sTM was an independent significant predictor of AKI. The nonadjusted OR of sTM was 1.11 (1.06–1.17, P < 0.003); the adjusted OR of model 1 was 1.10 (1.04–1.16, P = 0.001) and that of model 2 was 1.09 (1.04–1.16, P = 0.004) (Table 4).
Table 4

Logistic regression analysis for determining predictors of acute kidney injury in sepsis

 

OR (95% CI) (unadjusted)

P-value

OR (95% CI) (adjusted: model 1)

P value

OR (95% CI) (adjusted: model 2)

P value

Coagulation biomarkers

 Platelet

1.00 (0.99–1.00)

<0.0001

 FDP

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

0.022

 PT

0.98 (0.97–0.99)

<0.0001

 Fib

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.077

 α2-PI

0.99 (0.99–1.00)

0.029

 AT III

0.98 (0.97–0.99)

<0.0001

 Plasminogen

0.99 (0.98–0.99)

0.0003

 TAT

1.02 (1.01–1.04)

0.0004

 PIC

1.02 (0.95–1.11)

0.603

 Overt DIC

4.10 (2.39–7.47)

<0.0001

Endothelial activation

 Protein C

0.98 (0.98–0.99)

<0.0001

 sTM

1.11 (1.06–1.17)

<0.0001

1.10 (1.04–1.16)

0.001

1.09 (1.03–1.16)

0.004

 E-selectin

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

0.029

 PAI-1

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.007

Abbreviations: AKI Acute kidney injury, AT III Antithrombin III, DIC Disseminated intravascular coagulation, FDP Fibrin degradation product, PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, α 2 PI α2-Plasminogen inhibitor, PIC Plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex, PT Prothrombin time, sTM Soluble thrombomodulin, TAT Thrombin-antithrombin complex

Model 1 included endothelial biomarkers, all coagulation biomarkers including overt DIC, and inflammation factors. Model 2 included endothelial biomarkers, all coagulation factors including overt DIC, inflammation factors, organ functions, and age and hypertension

Relationship of sTM and CKD at time of ICU admission

Researchers in previous studies have reported that sTM was elevated in patients with CKD compared with healthy subjects [24, 25]. Therefore, we analyzed whether the sTM level was different according to the presence or absence of CKD (premorbid eGFR < 60 ml/minute/1.73 m2). In the non-AKI group, there was a significant difference in sTM levels between patients who presented with vs. without CKD (20.4 vs. 13.6 U/ml, P = 0.049). Furthermore, in both groups with and without CKD, patients who presented with AKI had significantly higher levels of sTM than those without AKI (31.4 vs. 20.4 U/ml, P = 0.013; 22.9 vs. 13.6 U/ml, P = 0.001, respectively), suggesting that the elevated sTM was related more to the development of AKI than to baseline renal function (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) levels in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or without AKI differentiated by the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

Discussion

In this study, the AKI group presented not only endothelial injury but also activation of the coagulation system and the development of organ dysfunction. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only sTM was an independent significant factor compared with several indices of coagulation activation, inflammation, and organ dysfunction. During the clinical course of sepsis, endothelial injury may occur initially, and then subsequent activation of coagulation leads to organ dysfunction [10]. On the basis of results of multivariable logistic regression analysis, we speculate that endothelial injury occurs as a result of inflammation in sepsis, which in turn results in AKI.

Thrombomodulin (TM) is a thrombin receptor expressed on the surface of endothelial cells. Once thrombin binds with endothelial TM, protein C is activated, and sTM is released into the bloodstream, which inactivates the procoagulant function of thrombin. There is some evidence that increased sTM levels are indicative of endothelial injury, with correlations to DIC, multiple organ failure (MOF), and mortality [7, 26, 27]. However, only three studies have been focused on the relationship between AKI and sTM. In a multicenter, prospective, observational study, sTM and protein C were shown to be predictable markers of AKI in critical care settings [16], whereas in another study, sTM and angiopoietin-2 were shown to play important roles in the development of AKI in patients with acute myocardial infarction [17]. Investigators in another study reported that the high levels of sTM were associated with reduction in the chance of recovery prior to renal function in patients with AKI [28]. However, neither of these studies was focused specifically on patients with sepsis and evaluated the comparison between endothelial activity and coagulopathy. In this study, we used two models of multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the relationship between endothelial function, coagulopathy, and inflammation because these parameters are related to each other. The results indicated that elevated sTM, as a marker of endothelial injury, was a strong independent predictive factor for AKI, regardless of coagulopathy, inflammation, and organ function.

In previous studies, researchers have reported that elevated sTM and protein C levels are strong predictors of AKI in critically ill patients [16]. In this study, protein C was significantly decreased in AKI; however, protein C was not an independent factor in multivariable analysis. This may be partly because our study population comprised patients with sepsis, which is different from previous studies. Coagulation disorders frequently occur in sepsis and are associated with inflammation, which may account for the lack of significant differences in protein C levels between the groups. In this study, we evaluated coagulation function in more detail; however, even when these were factored into the multivariate analysis, only sTM, and not protein C, remained independently predictive of AKI. These results indicate that protein C is more related to coagulation behavior; it may not be a good predictor for AKI.

Some studies have indicated that sTM levels increase in patients with CKD because sTM is excreted by the kidney [25, 29]. Kazama et al. reached this conclusion on the basis of the relationship between decreased urinary TM excretion and increased plasma levels of sTM in patients with CKD [29]. However, no data were available for either creatinine levels or baseline characteristics in their study. In contrast, Lin et al. showed that there was no relationship between sTM and creatinine clearance in patients with septic DIC and/or MOF [7]. Although we did not measure urinary TM in this study, there was a relationship between sTM and CKD in the non-AKI group. However, there was a significant difference in sTM levels in the AKI group, regardless of the presence or absence of CKD. Besides, compared with sTM, the baseline creatinine level was not an independent factor predictive of AKI. In this study, high levels of sTM suggest the predomination of endothelial injury rather than decreases in sTM clearance in patients with sepsis.

In two other studies, researchers found that levels of E-selectin significantly increased in cases of AKI in sepsis, but they measured only the levels of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin as markers of endothelial injury and did not measure coagulopathy [12, 13]. Therefore, it is unclear whether AKI or coagulation disorders were more predominant, because the presence of coagulation disorders was not verified in these studies. In our study, E-selectin presented with a significantly increased level in the AKI group, but it was not an independent factor with a low AUROC of 0.629. Therefore, we considered it to be insufficient for use as a predictive marker for AKI in sepsis if used as a single parameter.

This study has several strengths. One strength is that this is the first study, to our knowledge, including assessment of sTM as a parameter to evaluate endothelial injury during AKI in sepsis. Another strength is that we provide a detailed examination of coagulation parameters, as well as multivariate analysis and AUROC of the various coagulation parameters, including those of the criteria for overt DIC, which showed that there was an independent relationship between endothelial injury and AKI.

However, our study also has several limitations. First, this study was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Second, we evaluated four parameters of endothelial injury, but we did not measure other parameters, such as ICAM-1 or VCAM-1. Further studies are needed to evaluate ideal predictive endothelial biomarkers for AKI. Third, data were not available for some biological markers during admission to the ICU. However, this study included a relatively large numbers of patients, which makes these results reliable. Fourth, there was a possibility that AKI had already occurred before admission to the ICU. Therefore, timing of AKI was not always matched for all patients. Further studies are needed to confirm the relationship between endothelial biomarkers and timing of AKI. Finally, we did not evaluate other biomarkers specifically related to AKI, such as urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [30] and kidney injury molecule-1 [31]. AKI was not only caused by endothelial injury but also confounded by factors such as ischemia or drug toxicity. Therefore, such biomarkers may be superior for the early detection of AKI. However, it is important to evaluate the pathophysiology of AKI in sepsis; it may be associated with any potential clinical intervention for each cause. In this regard, the combination of several biomarkers and definition of AKI may be ideal for evaluating the cause of AKI in sepsis.

Conclusions

We show that sTM is an independent predictor of AKI in sepsis that is superior to other coagulation and inflammation biomarkers as well as organ function. However, further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between biomarkers of endothelial injury and the development of AKI in sepsis. With time, it is hoped that this will facilitate early recognition of endothelial injury and early treatment.

Abbreviations

AKI: 

Acute kidney injury

Alb: 

Albumin

APACHE II: 

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II

AT III: 

Antithrombin III

BMI: 

Body mass index

BNP: 

Brain natriuretic peptide

BUN: 

Blood urea nitrogen

BW: 

Body weight

CHD: 

Chronic heart disease

CKD: 

Chronic kidney disease

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CR-BSI: 

Catheter-related bloodstream infection

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CVA: 

Cerebrovascular accident

DIC: 

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

DM: 

Diabetes mellitus

eGFR: 

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

FDP: 

Fibrin degradation product

Hb: 

Hemoglobin

ICAM-1: 

Intracellular adhesion molecule-1

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

IHD: 

Ischemic heart disease

KDIGO: 

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes

MOF: 

Multiple organ failure

PAI-1: 

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1

α2-PI: 

α2-Plasminogen inhibitor

PIC: 

Plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex

PT: 

Prothrombin time

SOFA: 

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

sTM: 

Soluble thrombomodulin

TAT: 

Thrombin-antithrombin complex

T-bil: 

Total bilirubin

TM: 

Thrombomodulin

UTI: 

Urinary tract infection

VCAM-1: 

Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

WBC: 

White blood cell count

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the assistance from the nursing staff of the intensive care unit at Jichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.

Funding

The study was conducted with the help of internal departmental funds.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset generated and/or analyzed during the present study is not publicly available, owing to patient-related confidentiality, but it is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

SK collected the data, interpreted the statistical results, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SN and KK contributed to the design of the protocol and revised the manuscript. YG collected the data and revised the manuscript. MW, TK, KT, and JS revised the manuscript. All authors are accountable for all aspects of the work, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Jichi Medical University (Tochigi, Japan) (16-116). Informed consent was waived on the basis of the study’s retrospective, observational design and preservation of confidentiality of personal information.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine

References

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, et al. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:431–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kolhe NV, Stevens PE, Crowe AV, Lipkin GW, Harrison DA. Case mix, outcome and activity for patients with severe acute kidney injury during the first 24 hours after admission to an adult, general critical care unit: application of predictive models from a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme database. Crit Care. 2008;12 Suppl 1:S2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R. Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation. Crit Care. 2008;12:R47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kellum JA, Lameire N. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (part 1). Crit Care. 2013;17:204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Shapiro NI, Schuetz P, Yano K, Sorasaki M, Parikh SM, Jones AE, et al. The association of endothelial cell signaling, severity of illness, and organ dysfunction in sepsis. Crit Care. 2010;14:R182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin SM, Wang YM, Lin HC, Lee KY, Huang CD, Liu CY, et al. Serum thrombomodulin level relates to the clinical course of disseminated intravascular coagulation, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, and mortality in patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:683–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schrier RW, Wang W. Acute renal failure and sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:159–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Umbro I, Gentile G, Tinti F, Muiesan P, Mitterhofer AP. Recent advances in pathophysiology and biomarkers of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. J Infect. 2016;72:131–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doi K. Role of kidney injury in sepsis. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Reinhart K, Bayer O, Brunkhorst F, Meisner M. Markers of endothelial damage in organ dysfunction and sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(5 Suppl):S302–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Su CM, Cheng HH, Hung CW, Hsiao SY, Tsai NW, Chang WN, et al. The value of serial serum cell adhesion molecules in predicting acute kidney injury after severe sepsis in adults. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;457:86–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Powell TC, Powell SL, Allen BK, Griffin RL, Warnock DG, Wang HE. Association of inflammatory and endothelial cell activation biomarkers with acute kidney injury after sepsis. Springerplus. 2014;3:207.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Kümpers P, Hafer C, David S, Hecker H, Lukasz A, Fliser D, et al. Angiopoietin-2 in patients requiring renal replacement therapy in the ICU: relation to acute kidney injury, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:462–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sadik NA, Mohamed WA, Ahmed MI. The association of receptor of advanced glycated end products and inflammatory mediators contributes to endothelial dysfunction in a prospective study of acute kidney injury patients with sepsis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;359:73–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bouchard J, Malhotra R, Shah S, Kao YT, Vaida F, Gupta A, et al. Levels of protein C and soluble thrombomodulin in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multicenter prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0120770.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu KL, Lee KT, Chang CH, Chen YC, Lin SM, Chu PH. Elevated plasma thrombomodulin and angiopoietin-2 predict the development of acute kidney injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care. 2014;18:R100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Koyama K, Madoiwa S, Nunomiya S, Koinuma T, Wada M, Sakata A, et al. Combination of thrombin-antithrombin complex, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and protein C activity for early identification of severe coagulopathy in initial phase of sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2014;18:R13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(2 Suppl 1):S1–266.Google Scholar
  22. Pickering JW, Endre ZH. Back-calculating baseline creatinine with MDRD misclassifies acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1165–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor Jr FB, Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H, Levi M. Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:1327–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Takano S, Kimura S, Ohdama S, Aoki N. Plasma thrombomodulin in health and diseases. Blood. 1990;76:2024–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Iba T, Yagi Y, Kidokoro A, Fukunaga M, Fukunaga T. Increased plasma levels of soluble thrombomodulin in patients with sepsis and organ failure. Surg Today. 1995;25:585–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Boldt J, Wollbrück T, Sonneborn S, Welters A, Hempelmann G. Thrombomodulin in intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21:645–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Itenov TS, Jensen JU, Ostrowski SR, Johansson PI, Lundgren JD, Bestle MH. Endothelial damage signals refractory acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Shock. 2017;47:696–701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kazama M. Soluble thrombomodulin: a specific parameter of endothelial injury [in Japanese]. Rinsho Ketsueki. 1991;32:103–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mishra J, Ma Q, Prada A, Mitsnefes M, Zahedi K, Yang J, et al. Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel early urinary biomarker for ischemic renal injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:2534–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R, Thadhani R, Bonventre JV. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int. 2002;62:237–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement