Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in intensive care units: a multicenter study by ESGCIP and EFISG

Critical Care volume 27, Article number: 323 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic, life-threatening disease commonly affecting immunocompromised patients. The distribution of predisposing diseases or conditions in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and subjected to diagnostic work-up for PJP has seldom been explored.

Materials and methods

The primary objective of the study was to describe the characteristics of ICU patients subjected to diagnostic workup for PJP. The secondary objectives were: (i) to assess demographic and clinical variables associated with PJP; (ii) to assess the performance of Pneumocystis PCR on respiratory specimens and serum BDG for the diagnosis of PJP; (iii) to describe 30-day and 90-day mortality in the study population.

Results

Overall, 600 patients were included in the study, of whom 115 had presumptive/proven PJP (19.2%). Only 8.8% of ICU patients subjected to diagnostic workup for PJP had HIV infection, whereas hematological malignancy, solid tumor, inflammatory diseases, and solid organ transplants were present in 23.2%, 16.2%, 15.5%, and 10.0% of tested patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, AIDS (odds ratio [OR] 3.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–9.64, p = 0.029), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.23–11.18, p = 0.020), vasculitis (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.07–33.22, p = 0.042), metastatic solid tumor (OR 4.31; 95% CI 1.76–10.53, p = 0.001), and bilateral ground glass on CT scan (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.01–4.78, p = 0.048) were associated with PJP, whereas an inverse association was observed for increasing lymphocyte cell count (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42–1.00, p = 0.049). For the diagnosis of PJP, higher positive predictive value (PPV) was observed when both respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG were positive compared to individual assay positivity (72% for the combination vs. 63% for PCR and 39% for BDG). Cumulative 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality in patients with presumptive/proven PJP were 52% and 67%, respectively.

Conclusion

PJP in critically ill patients admitted to ICU is nowadays most encountered in non-HIV patients. Serum BDG when used in combination with respiratory Pneumocystis PCR could help improve the certainty of PJP diagnosis.

Introduction

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) was most commonly described as an opportunistic, life-threatening disease in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [1, 2]. However, due to the increased use of immunosuppressants, biologic agents, and corticosteroids for treating diseases such as inflammatory diseases, hematological malignancies, and solid neoplasms, novel populations at risk of PJP have emerged over the last decades, with reported mortality ranging from 33 to 69% [3,4,5,6,7].

Patients with severe PJP often require intensive care management. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting Pneumocystis DNA from respiratory samples and serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) are widely used to support the diagnosis of PJP in these patients, despite the heterogeneity in assay design and positivity threshold [8,9,10,11,12]. The distribution of predisposing diseases/conditions in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and subjected to diagnostic workup for PJP, or diagnosed with PJP, has seldom been explored, and usually in small, single center cohorts limiting confidence in findings [13].

The present multinational, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of critically ill patients admitted to ICU and undergoing a PJP diagnostic workup, in order to understand the current distribution of predisposing diseases and conditions both in patients evaluated for PJP and in those with a PJP diagnosis. The performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG for the diagnosis of PJP in the study population was also explored as a secondary aim.

Materials and methods

Study setting and objectives

The present retrospective, multicenter, multinational study, coordinated by San Martino Polyclinic Hospital in Genoa, Italy, was conducted in 8 different countries for a total of 18 participating centers (five in France, five in Italy, two in Germany, two in Spain, one in Belgium, one in Ireland, one in Sweden, and one in UK). The retrospective study period was from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. Consecutive ICU patients with radiographically documented pneumonia who underwent Pneumocystis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on respiratory specimens (sputum, tracheal aspirate, and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) and/or serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) within a diagnostic workup for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) were included in the study. Centers could opt for participating only for most recent years of the study period, provided all consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria were included for the selected years. Exclusion criteria were: (1) age < 18 years; (2) patient already included in the study. The primary objective of the study was to describe the characteristics of ICU patients suspected to have PJP. The secondary objectives were: (1) to assess demographic and clinical variables associated with diagnosis of PJP; (2) to assess the performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG for the diagnosis of PJP; (3) to describe 30-day and 90-day mortality in the study population. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the coordinating center (Liguria Region Ethics Committee, N. Registro CER Liguria 305/2021). Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The other participating centers followed the local ethical requirements.

Definitions

For patients with available microscopy results, proven PJP was defined as detection of Pneumocystis in respiratory specimens via conventional or immunofluorescence staining, according to EORTC/MSGERC definitions [14]. In line with the specific aims of the present study, we did not employ the EORTC/MSGERC criteria for defining probable PJP [14]. Instead, the diagnostic categories for PJP in the absence of a proven diagnosis were defined as “presumptive PJP”, “no PJP”, or “PJP diagnosis inconclusive”, based on independent review of completed electronic case report forms (eCRF) for each patient by two independent medical investigators (D.R.G. and S.D.), with cases of disagreement being resolved by a third medical investigator (A.V.). Although this approach is not standardized and is not exempt from biases (see study limitations in the discussion), the use of the “probable” diagnostic category as per EORTC/MSGERC criteria was deemed as unsuitable for the specific aims of the present study, for the following reasons: (i) it was frequently not possible to define probable PJP retrospectively due to the lack of all the required data for categorization (e.g., presence, dosage, and length of steroid treatment); and, most importantly, (ii) Pneumocystis PCR and/or serum BDG are necessary mycological criteria for defining probable PJP according to EORTC/MSGERC criteria, thereby resulting in a significant incorporation bias when assessing the diagnostic performance of either of the two markers [14]. Certainly, our approach does not eliminate incorporation bias since the results of the two markers also influenced the independent categorization as presumptive PJP by the investigators. However, categorization was conceived on a more global assessment of the clinical picture and disease course (i.e., concomitant presence of alternative causative agents of interstitial pneumonia, response to treatment for PJP and for concomitant infections). A detailed list of the diagnostic tests employed in the different participating centers is available as Additional file (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Data collection

Data were uploaded by the local investigator on an electronic case report form (eCRF) specifically designed for the present study and reviewed by S.D. and F.D.P., with real-time generation of pertinent queries that were resolved by local investigators [15]. The following data related to demographics and medical history were collected from the patients’ medical charts: age in years; sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index [16]; HIV infection; presence of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS); presence of hematological malignancies; previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); previous solid organ transplantation (SOT); presence of inflammatory diseases; presence of solid tumor; chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in the previous 30 days, presence of chronic pulmonary diseases, presence of chronic kidney disease (defined as glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min), presence of chronic liver disease (defined histologically as liver cirrhosis or in presence of a clinical diagnosis supported by laboratory, endoscopy, and radiologic findings [17]); New York Heart Association (NYHA) score; previous intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (within 30 days), previous blood transfusions (within 30 days); previous albumin therapy (within 30 days); previous major surgery (within 30 days); receipt of PJP prophylaxis. Besides information on serum BDG and respiratory Pneumocystis PCR results, the following data were also collected at time of PJP suspicion: characteristics of lung lesion/s at computerized tomography; presence and type of concomitant infections; blood leukocyte count; blood lymphocyte count, blood CD4 + T lymphocyte count; blood neutrophil count; serum C-reactive protein (CRP); serum procalcitonin (PCT); presence of invasive mechanical ventilation; presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [18]; presence of septic shock [19]; sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [20]; receipt of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); receipt of PJP therapy.

Statistical analysis

The primary study objective was to describe the characteristics of ICU patients suspected to have PJP. To this aim, proportions for categorical variables and median values for continuous variables are presented descriptively, both in the entire cohort and stratified according to PJP diagnosis. To assess factors associated with PJP, demographic and clinical variables were first tested for their possible association with PJP in univariable logistic regression models. All variables potentially associated with presumptive/proven PJP by univariable analyses (p < 0.10) were included in an initial multivariable logistic regression model and further selected for inclusion in a final multivariable model (model A) using a stepwise, backward procedure. In addition, variables included in model A were also included in a second generalized linear mixed model with logit as the link function (model B), which also included center as a random effect. The diagnostic performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG for the diagnosis of PJP (setting either presumptive/proven PJP or only proven PJP as the diagnostic references) was assessed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR−). A serum BDG value equal or above the manufacturer cut-off (according to the type of employed assay) was defined as the criterion for serum BDG positivity. For the molecular detection of Pneumocystis, any positive result (irrespective of the Ct value) was considered significant for respiratory Pneumocystis PCR positivity. For available paired data, the possible correlation between serum BDG values and Ct values from Pneumocystis PCR assays performed on different specimens (sputum, tracheal aspirate, or BALF) was assessed by measuring Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Survival up to either 30-day or 90-day was descriptively summarized through Kaplan–Meier curves and compared between patients with PJP and without PJP using the log-rank test. Statistical analyses were performed with R Statistical Software (version 3.6.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and SPSS Statistics (version 29.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US).

Results

Overall, 600 patients were included in the study (Fig. 1). Of them, 115 were classified as presumptive/proven PJP (19.2%), and 444/600 were classified as no PJP (74%). The remaining 41/600 patients (6.8%) were classified as “PJP diagnosis inconclusive”. Among patients with PJP, 31/115 (27.0%) and 84/115 (73.0%) were classified as proven PJP and presumptive PJP, respectively. The baseline demographic and clinic characteristics were similar between patients with proven PJP and presumptive PJP (Additional file 1: Table S2). As shown in Table 1, only 8.8% of patients subjected to diagnostic workup for PJP had HIV infection, whereas hematological malignancy, solid tumors, inflammatory diseases, and solid organ transplants were present in 23.2%, 16.2%, 15.5%, and 10.0% of patients, respectively. Concomitant coronavirus disease 2019 was present in 75 patients (12.6%). Only 3.8% of patients were under PJP prophylaxis (in all cases with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) at the time of BDG/PCR testing. The median SOFA score at the time of the BDG/PCR testing was 6 (interquartile range 4–9), and as many as 28.9% of patients had septic shock. The frequency of presumptive/proven PJP by baseline condition/disease was 42.3% (22/52) in patients with HIV infection, and 55.9% (19/34) among HIV infected patients with AIDS, while among patients with hematological malignancy, solid tumor, inflammatory diseases, and solid organ transplants it was 25.9% (36/139), 28.9% (28/97), 18.3% (17/93), and 10.0% (6/60), respectively. Of note, the frequency of presumptive/proven PJP in our study population was as high as 47.1% (16/34) and 40.0% (14/35) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and metastatic solid neoplasms, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the patients’ inclusion process. eCRF, electronic case report forms. Missing key data was defined as unavailability of information regarding both Pneumocystis polymerase chain reaction results and serum β-D-glucan results

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population
Full size table

The results of univariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with presumptive/proven PJP, conducted in 559 patients (after the exclusion of 41/600 patients with inconclusive PJP diagnosis) are available in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. As shown in Table 2, HIV infection, AIDS, hematological malignancy, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, solid tumor, metastatic solid tumor, Charlson Comorbidity Index, previous chemotherapy, previous radiotherapy, increasing serum CRP values, and bilateral ground-glass opacities were associated with PJP in univariable analysis. Conversely, an inverse association with PJP was observed for increasing length of hospital and ICU stay before PJP testing, invasive mechanical ventilation, increasing lymphocyte cell count, and increasing neutrophil cell count. In multivariable model A (Table 3), AIDS (odds ratio [OR] 3.31; 95% CI 1.13–9.64, p = 0.029), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.23–11.18, p = 0.020), vasculitis (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.07–33.22, p = 0.042) metastatic solid tumor (OR 4.31; 95% CI 1.76–10.53, p = 0.001) and bilateral ground glass on CT scan (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.01–4.78, p = 0.048) retained an association with PJP, whereas an inverse association with PJP was retained for invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24–0.80, p = 0.007), and increasing lymphocyte cell count (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42–1.00, p = 0.049). The results of the additional multivariable model B including center as a random effect were in line with the directions of effects observed in model A (Table 3).

Table 2 Univariable analysis of factors associated with presumptive/proven PJP
Full size table
Table 3 Multivariable analysis of factors associated with presumptive/proven PJP
Full size table

The diagnostic performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR for the diagnosis of presumptive/proven PJP and for proven PJP only is shown in Table 4. Overall, respiratory Pneumocystis PCR was performed in 561/600 patients (93.5%), with results available for 550/561 patients (in the remaining 11 patients, Pneumocystis PCR was performed but the results were not provided). Using any positive results for the molecular detection of Pneumocystis DNA as the criterion for positivity, respiratory Pneumocystis PCR showed 100% sensitivity and 100% NPV both for diagnosis of presumptive/proven PJP and for proven PJP (in this latter case the analysis was conducted in the subgroup of patients who underwent microscopy, 190/550, 34.5%). Specificity was 85% and 61% for the diagnosis of presumptive/proven PJP and proven PJP, respectively. In subgroups according to the type of respiratory specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) specificity for the diagnosis of presumptive/proven PJP was lower for Pneumocystis PCR performed on sputum (68%) compared with deeper samples (85% for both tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [BALF]), with Pneumocystis PCR on BALF showing overall the best diagnostic performance (Table 4). The diagnostic performance of serum BDG for the diagnosis of presumptive/proven PJP and for proven PJP only is shown in Table 5. Overall, serum BDG testing was performed in 327/600 patients (54.5%), mostly employing the Fungitell assay (293/327, 89.6%), whereas the Wako assay was employed only in 34/327 cases (10.4%), as shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The distribution of BDG values according to presumptive/proven PJP diagnosis is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1 (results reported for the Fungitell assay). Based on Youden index, the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of presumptive/proven PJP using the Fungitell assay was a cut-off level of 230 pg/mL, showing 82% sensitivity and 82% specificity (figure S2). The diagnostic performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG in subgroups according to baseline disease/condition is available in Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4, respectively. Although with moderate strength, correlations were identified between increasing serum BDG values and decreasing Ct values of Pneumocystis PCR on BALF (63 pairs, p < 0.001, Spearman r − 0.49) and between increasing serum BDG values and decreasing Ct values of Pneumocystis PCR on tracheal aspirate (10 pairs, p = 0.041, Spearman r -0.67). Finally, an increased PPV was observed when both respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG were positive in comparison with the performances of the two markers separately, whereas when both were negative their NPV did not substantially vary compared with the NPV obtained using only respiratory Pneumocystis PCR or only serum BDG (Fig. 2 and Additional file 1: Table S5).

Table 4 Performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR for the diagnosis of PJP*
Full size table
Table 5 Performance of serum BDG for the diagnosis of PJP*
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

PPV and NPV for presumptive/proven PJP of serum BDG and respiratory Pneumocystis PCR both separately and in combination. BDG, (1,3)-β-D-glucan; NPV, negative predictive value; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PJP, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia; PPV, positive predictive value. Criteria for positivity used for the comparisons in the graph are manufactures’ cut-offs for BDG (80 pg/mL for the Fungitell assay and 11 pg/mL for the Wako assay) and any positive result for respiratory Pneumocystis PCR (see study methods). For the combination (PCR plus BDG), the reported PPV was obtained when both markers were concordant in indicating PJP (both positive), while the reported NPV was obtained when both markers when concordant in indicating no PJP (both negative)

Full size image

Overall, 98.3% of patients with presumptive/proven PJP received PJP therapy (113/115, 98.3%), mostly with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (96.5%, 109/113). Information on concomitant/alternative infections due to pathogens other than Pneumocystis jirovecii are available in Additional file 1: Table S6. As shown in Additional file 1: figures S3 and S4, both cumulative 30-day mortality and cumulative 90-day mortality were high and similar in patients with and without PJP (i.e., with other causes of pneumonia, see Additional file 1: Table S6) in our study population. More in detail, cumulative 30-day mortality was 52% and 47% in patients with presumptive/proven PJP and without PJP, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.74), and cumulative 90-day mortality was 67% and 68% in patients with presumptive/proven PJP and without PJP, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.76). Cumulative 30-day and cumulative 90-day mortality stratified by baseline condition/disease (HIV infection vs. other baseline diseases or conditions) in patients with presumptive/proven PJP are also available in Additional file 1: Figures S5 and S6.

Discussion

In the present large, multinational cohort study, we showed that: (i) more patients admitted to ICU are subjected to PJP diagnostic workup compared with the past, with a reduction in the relative frequency of patients with HIV infection and an increase in patients with hematological and neoplastic diseases, solid organ transplant, and inflammatory diseases; (ii) combining serum BDG and respiratory Pneumocystis PCR improved the PPV for the diagnosis of PJP in critically ill patients admitted to ICU.

Although patients with HIV infection and AIDS were still those eventually showing a higher frequency of PJP in our cohort (55.9%), the absolute number of HIV patients with PJP was much lower than the absolute number of patients with PJP and other predisposing diseases or conditions, which is in line with results from previous smaller cohorts [5, 6]. Overall, while HIV infection remains one of the factors conferring the highest risk of PJP, the expanding denominator of ICU patients with other predisposing conditions overall makes PJP more commonly encountered in non-HIV critically ill patients nowadays, a fact that should be considered by ICU physicians caring for patients with pneumonia and forms of immunosuppression other than HIV infection. Besides AIDS, other predisposing conditions showing an independent association with PJP in multivariable models were non-Hodgkin lymphoma, metastatic solid tumor, and vasculitis. Among factors inversely associated with PJP diagnosis, the apparently reduced risk conferred by invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of PJP diagnostic workup may reflect the fact that PJP was most frequently the reason for ICU admission and for requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation rather than a complication developing during ICU stay. The increased risk conferred by low lymphocyte counts is conversely more likely testifying a true risk factor, in line with what observed in HIV patients with low CD4 + lymphocyte cell count [21]. Of note, although a few associations did not retain statistical significance in the additional multivariable model including center as a random effect (model B), the directions of effects were in line with those observed in the primary model (model A), suggesting limited influence of between-center variability on results. This is important considering the possible heterogeneity in the diagnostic workup for PJP in the different participating centers (e.g., testing in all patients with interstitial pneumonia vs. testing only in patients with risk factors), and strengthens the generalizability of the detected associations.

Regarding the secondary objective of assessing the diagnostic performance for PJP of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG, in our study respiratory Pneumocystis PCR showed high sensitivity (100%) and relatively low specificity (up to 85% for BALF, and lower for sputum samples) for the diagnosis of presumptive/proven PJP. Notably, although the majority of patients in our cohort underwent PCR testing on BALF, some did not; this could represent an important limitation for the diagnostic assessment of PJP in real life setting, considering the overall better diagnostic performance of BALF testing compared with other respiratory samples [22,23,24,25]. In our opinion, some important considerations may stem from our results: (i) in presence of a negative respiratory Pneumocystis PCR, PJP seems to be very unlikely (i.e., PCR retains a high NPV), even in presence of a positive serum BDG; (ii) concomitant positivity of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG increases PPV in comparison with PCR alone, potentially helping to distinguish between Pneumocystis colonization and infection in the absence of established cut-offs for quantitative molecular tests (and/or when qualitative molecular tests are employed) [25, 26].

A first important limitation, related to our primary descriptive analysis, is the lack of precise information about previous/ongoing corticosteroid treatment (e.g., dosage, length of therapy), a recognized predisposing condition to PJP, that was unfortunately unavailable retrospectively. However, in our opinion, this limitation eventually did not undermine the identification of the spectrum of baseline diseases nowadays encountered in critically ill patients with PJP. Future studies with a more detailed information on steroid treatments could help to define the possible reasons for the low prevalence of patients on PJP prophylaxis in our cohort despite the high frequency of patients with at least one predisposing disease/condition. Notably, a low frequency of PJP prophylaxis in non-HIV patients at risk of PJP was already reported by Dunbar and colleagues and by Roux and colleagues [27, 28]. The lack of detailed information about corticosteroid treatments also precluded the evaluation of the diagnostic performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and serum BDG using the EORTC/MSGERC definition of probable PJP, although it should be highlighted that this would have resulted in a significant incorporation bias [14]. Of course, our definition of presumptive PJP, although more suitable for the aims of the present study, is not standardized and also still hampered by a nonnegligible risk of incorporation bias, that should be necessarily acknowledged. This also considering the relatively low frequency of patients who underwent computerized tomography (56.5%), the absence of which could have further hampered the identification of PJP and its differential diagnosis in some cases. Second, in the assessment of the diagnostic performance of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR we defined any positive result as the criterion for positivity, to preserve homogeneity of interpretation despite the wide heterogeneity of employed molecular tests across centers (Additional file 1: Table S1), whereas higher fungal loads are typically more indicative of active infection than low fungal loads [29]. In this regard, the highly fragmented data in terms of Ct values available for this study prevented us from reliably assessing potential thresholds to distinguish between colonization and infection. A third limitation arises from the recognized suboptimal sensitivity of the diagnostic gold standard (microscopy) [30] and from the low number of microscopy tests performed in our real life cohort, that forced us to strongly rely on a definition of presumptive disease as diagnostic reference. Finally, it should be noted that mortality rates reported in this study, either for PJP or for pneumonia caused by other pathogens, are only presented descriptively and unadjusted for other prognostic factors.

In conclusion, PJP in critically ill patients admitted to ICU is nowadays most encountered in non-HIV patients. Our results also suggest a high NPV of respiratory Pneumocystis PCR and that combining PCR with serum BDG increases the otherwise modest PPV, although further dedicated study remains necessary to precisely delineate their role within PJP diagnostic algorithms in the ICU.

Availability of data and materials

The data presented in this study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and provided all regulatory and privacy requirements are fulfilled.

References

  1. Phair J, Munoz A, Detels R, Kaslow R, Rinaldo C, Saah A. The risk of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia among men infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(3):161–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford N, Shubber Z, Meintjes G, Grinsztejn B, Eholie S, Mills EJ, Davies MA, Vitoria M, Penazzato M, Nsanzimana S, et al. Causes of hospital admission among people living with HIV worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(10):e438-444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt JJ, Lueck C, Ziesing S, Stoll M, Haller H, Gottlieb J, Eder M, Welte T, Hoeper MM, Scherag A, et al. Clinical course, treatment and outcome of Pneumocystis pneumonia in immunocompromised adults: a retrospective analysis over 17 years. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pagano L, Fianchi L, Mele L, Girmenia C, Offidani M, Ricci P, Mitra ME, Picardi M, Caramatti C, Piccaluga P, et al. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with malignant haematological diseases: 10 years’ experience of infection in GIMEMA centres. Br J Haematol. 2002;117(2):379–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Enomoto T, Azuma A, Kohno A, Kaneko K, Saito H, Kametaka M, Usuki J, Gemma A, Kudoh S, Nakamura S. Differences in the clinical characteristics of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in immunocompromized patients with and without HIV infection. Respirology. 2010;15(1):126–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ainoda Y, Hirai Y, Fujita T, Isoda N, Totsuka K. Analysis of clinical features of non-HIV Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18(5):722–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanj A, Samhouri B, Abdallah N, Chehab O, Baqir M. Host factors and outcomes in hospitalizations for pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(2):400–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guegan H, Robert-Gangneux F. Molecular diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019;32(4):314–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Carolis E, Marchionni F, Torelli R, Angela MG, Pagano L, Murri R, De Pascale G, De Angelis G, Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B. Comparative performance evaluation of Wako beta-glucan test and Fungitell assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0236095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Azoulay E, Guigue N, Darmon M, Mokart D, Lemiale V, Kouatchet A, Mayaux J, Vincent F, Nyunga M, Bruneel F, et al. (1, 3)-β-D-glucan assay for diagnosing invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients with hematological malignancies. Oncotarget. 2016;7(16):21484–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Alanio A, Hauser PM, Lagrou K, Melchers WJ, Helweg-Larsen J, Matos O, Cesaro S, Maschmeyer G, Einsele H, Donnelly JP, et al. ECIL guidelines for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(9):2386–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lagrou K, Chen S, Masur H, Viscoli C, Decker CF, Pagano L, Groll AH. Pneumocystis jirovecii disease: basis for the revised EORTC/MSGERC invasive fungal disease definitions in individuals without human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(Suppl 2):S114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y, Huang X, Sun T, Fan G, Zhan Q, Weng L. Non-HIV-infected patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia in the intensive care unit: a bicentric, retrospective study focused on predictive factors of in-hospital mortality. Clin Respir J. 2022;16(2):152–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, Clancy CJ, Wingard JR, Lockhart SR, Groll AH, et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1367–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Meco G, Mora S, Giacobbe DR, Dettori S, Karaiskos I, Bassetti M, Giacomini M. Esgcip: a wide database for a multicenter study on pneumocystis Jirovecii pneumonia in intensive care units. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022;294:557–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bartoletti M, Giannella M, Lewis R, Caraceni P, Tedeschi S, Paul M, Schramm C, Bruns T, Merli M, Cobos-Trigueros N, et al. A prospective multicentre study of the epidemiology and outcomes of bloodstream infection in cirrhotic patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(5):e541–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchacz K, Lau B, Jing Y, Bosch R, Abraham AG, Gill MJ, Silverberg MJ, Goedert JJ, Sterling TR, Althoff KN, et al. Incidence of AIDS-defining opportunistic infections in a multicohort analysis of HIV-infected persons in the United States and Canada, 2000–2010. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(6):862–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinlaor S, Mootsikapun P, Pinlaor P, Phunmanee A, Pipitgool V, Sithithaworn P, Chumpia W, Sithithaworn J. PCR diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii on sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples in immuno-compromised patients. Parasitol Res. 2004;94(3):213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan LC, Lu HW, Cheng KB, Li HP, Xu JF. Evaluation of PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a bivariate meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cordonnier C, Cesaro S, Maschmeyer G, Einsele H, Donnelly JP, Alanio A, Hauser PM, Lagrou K, Melchers WJ, Helweg-Larsen J, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: still a concern in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(9):2379–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bateman M, Oladele R, Kolls JK. Diagnosing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a review of current methods and novel approaches. Med Mycol. 2020;58(8):1015–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Senécal J, Smyth E, Del Corpo O, Hsu JM, Amar-Zifkin A, Amy Bergeron A, Cheng MP, Butler-Laporte G, McDonald EG, Lee TC. Non-invasive diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(1):23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dunbar A, Schauwvlieghe A, Algoe S, van Hellemond JJ, Reynders M, Vandecasteele S, Boelens J, Depuydt P, Rijnders B. Epidemiology of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and (non-)use of prophylaxis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Roux A, Canet E, Valade S, Gangneux-Robert F, Hamane S, Lafabrie A, Maubon D, Debourgogne A, Le Gal S, Dalle F, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with or without AIDS. France Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(9):1490–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarasombath PT, Thongpiya J, Chulanetra M, Wijit S, Chinabut P, Ongrotchanakun J, Jitmuang A, Wanachiwanawin D. Quantitative PCR to discriminate between pneumocystis pneumonia and colonization in HIV and non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:729193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cruciani M, Marcati P, Malena M, Bosco O, Serpelloni G, Mengoli C. Meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected patients. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(4):982–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

JIR-ICU investigators (collaborators): Matteo Cerchiaro, Mario Zaccarelli, Chiara Robba, Denise Battaglini, Iole Brunetti, Filippo Del Puente, Sara Mora; Sofía de la Villa, Maricela Valerio, Patricia Muñoz, Gianmarco Lombardi, Melania Cesarano, Veronica Gennenzi, Philippe Meersseman, Greet Hermans, Alexander Wilmer, Keyvan Razazi, Guillaume Carteaux, Nicolas de Prost, Oliver A. Cornely, Danila Seidel, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Jorge Garcia Borrega, Christine Bonnal, Etienne de Montmollin, Julien Dessajan, Mariaelena Ceresini, Francesco Mojoli, Ambra Vola, Cécile Garnaud, Emili Díaz, Oriol Gasch, Elena Prina, Sebastian Rasch, Miriam Dibos, Stefanie Haschka.

Funding

This work was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Silvia Dettori, Giancarlo Icardi, Malgorzata Mikulska, Antonio Vena & Matteo Bassetti

  2. Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, L.go R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy

    Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Silvia Dettori, Gabriele Di Meco, Laura Magnasco, Cristina Marelli, Malgorzata Mikulska, Antonio Vena & Matteo Bassetti

  3. Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Vincenzo Di Pilato, Lorenzo Ball, Anna Marchese & Paolo Pelosi

  4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

    Erika Asperges

  5. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy

    Lorenzo Ball & Paolo Pelosi

  6. Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, DMU Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France

    Enora Berti & Armand Mekontso-Dessap

  7. Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Ola Blennow & Anna Nordlander

  8. Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Ola Blennow & Anna Nordlander

  9. Hygiene Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital-IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy

    Bianca Bruzzone & Giancarlo Icardi

  10. Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Laure Calvet

  11. Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

    Federico Capra Marzani

  12. Microbiology Unit, Laboratory Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain

    Antonio Casabella

  13. Inserm U1285, CHU Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576, UGSF, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale Et Fonctionnelle, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France

    Sofia Choudaly & Julien Poissy

  14. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France

    Anais Dartevel & Louis-Marie Galerneau

  15. Dipartimento di Scienze Dell’emergenza, Anestesiologiche e Della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy

    Gennaro De Pascale & Joel Vargas

  16. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

    Gennaro De Pascale

  17. Public Health Wales Mycology Reference Laboratory, PHW Microbiology Cardiff, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK

    Melissa Fallon & P. Lewis White

  18. Respiratory Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain

    Miguel Gallego

  19. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Miguel Gallego

  20. Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Mauro Giacomini

  21. Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

    Adolfo González Sáez & Mercedes Marín-Arriaza

  22. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Adolfo González Sáez & Mercedes Marín-Arriaza

  23. Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Centre for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Luise Hänsel & Philipp Koehler

  24. Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Luise Hänsel & Philipp Koehler

  25. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Katrien Lagrou & Joost Wauters

  26. Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Center for Mycosis, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Katrien Lagrou

  27. Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Tobias Lahmer

  28. Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK

    P. Lewis White

  29. UO Microbiologia, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy

    Anna Marchese

  30. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Mercedes Marín-Arriaza

  31. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), Dublin, Leinster, Ireland

    Ignacio Martin-Loeches

  32. Pulmonary Intensive Care Unit, Respiratory Institute, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS (Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer), University of Barcelona, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain

    Ignacio Martin-Loeches

  33. Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Faculté de Santé de Créteil, IMRB, Creteil, Île-de-France, France

    Armand Mekontso-Dessap

  34. INSERM, Creteil, Île-de-France, France

    Armand Mekontso-Dessap

  35. Unit of Infectious Diseases, ISMETT-IRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, Palermo, Italy

    Alessandra Mularoni & Giovanna Russelli

  36. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care Center, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France

    Julien Poissy

  37. Section of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Alessio Signori

  38. Infectious Diseases Clinic, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria del Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy

    Carlo Tascini

  39. Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy

    Carlo Tascini

  40. Medical and Infectious Diseases ICU, APHP, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France

    Louis-Maxime Vaconsin & Jean-Francois Timsit

  41. Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Joost Wauters

  42. INSERM, IAME, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

    Jean-Francois Timsit

Authors
  1. Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Silvia Dettori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vincenzo Di Pilato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erika Asperges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lorenzo Ball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enora Berti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ola Blennow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bianca Bruzzone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Laure Calvet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Federico Capra Marzani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Antonio Casabella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sofia Choudaly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Anais Dartevel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Gennaro De Pascale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Gabriele Di Meco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Melissa Fallon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Louis-Marie Galerneau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Miguel Gallego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Mauro Giacomini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Adolfo González Sáez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Luise Hänsel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Giancarlo Icardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Philipp Koehler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Katrien Lagrou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Tobias Lahmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. P. Lewis White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Laura Magnasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Anna Marchese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Cristina Marelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Mercedes Marín-Arriaza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Ignacio Martin-Loeches
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Armand Mekontso-Dessap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Malgorzata Mikulska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Alessandra Mularoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Anna Nordlander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Julien Poissy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  37. Giovanna Russelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  38. Alessio Signori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  39. Carlo Tascini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  40. Louis-Maxime Vaconsin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  41. Joel Vargas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  42. Antonio Vena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  43. Joost Wauters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  44. Paolo Pelosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  45. Jean-Francois Timsit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  46. Matteo Bassetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

JIR-ICU investigators (collaborators)

  • Matteo Cerchiaro
  • , Mario Zaccarelli
  • , Chiara Robba
  • , Denise Battaglini
  • , Iole Brunetti
  • , Filippo Del Puente
  • , Sara Mora
  • , Sofía de la Villa
  • , Maricela Valerio
  • , Patricia Muñoz
  • , Gianmarco Lombardi
  • , Melania Cesarano
  • , Veronica Gennenzi
  • , Philippe Meersseman
  • , Greet Hermans
  • , Alexander Wilmer
  • , Keyvan Razazi
  • , Guillaume Carteaux
  • , Nicolas de Prost
  • , Oliver A. Cornely
  • , Danila Seidel
  • , Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo
  • , Jorge Garcia Borrega
  • , Christine Bonnal
  • , Etienne de Montmollin
  • , Julien Dessajan
  • , Mariaelena Ceresini
  • , Francesco Mojoli
  • , Ambra Vola
  • , Cécile Garnaud
  • , Emili Díaz
  • , Oriol Gasch
  • , Elena Prina
  • , Sebastian Rasch
  • , Miriam Dibos
  •  & Stefanie Haschka

the Critically Ill Patients Study Group of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESGCIP), and the Fungal Infection Study Group of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (EFISG)

Contributions

DRG, SD, and MB conceived the research question and all authors participated in design of the study. All authors participated in data acquisition in the different participating centers. DRG, AS, GDM, SD, VDP, and CM contributed to data analysis. DRG and SD drafted the manuscript, which all authors contributed to revising. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Roberto Giacobbe.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study was approved by ethics committee of the coordinating center (Liguria Region Ethics Committee, N. Registro CER Liguria 305/2021). Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The other participating centers followed the local ethical requirements.

Competing interests

Outside the submitted work, DRG reports investigator-initiated grants from Pfizer, Shionogi, and Gilead Italia, and speaker and/or advisor fees from Pfizer and Tillotts Pharma. Outside the submitted work, MB reports research grants and/or personal fees for advisor/consultant and/or speaker/chairman from BioMérieux, Cidara, Gilead, Menarini, MSD, Pfizer, and Shionogi. Outside the submitted work, VDP reports research grant from Seegene Inc. Outside the submitted work, PLW performed diagnostic evaluations and received meeting sponsorship from Bruker; speakers fees, expert advice fees and meeting sponsorship from Gilead; expert advice fees from F2G and speaker fees from Pfizer; speakers fees and performed diagnostic evaluations for Associates of Cape Cod and IMMY. JW received meeting speakers and travel fees and investigator-initiated grants from MSD, Gilead and Pfizer, outside the scope of this manuscript. Outside the submitted work, PK reports grants or contracts from German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) B-FAST (Bundesweites Forschungsnetz Angewandte Surveillance und Testung) and NAPKON (Nationales Pandemie Kohorten Netz, German National Pandemic Cohort Network) of the Network University Medicine (NUM) and the State of North Rhine-Westphalia; Consulting fees Ambu GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Mundipharma Resarch Limited, Noxxon N.V. and Pfizer Pharma; Honoraria for lectures from Akademie für Infektionsmedizin e.V., Ambu GmbH, Astellas Pharma, BioRad Laboratories Inc., Datamed GmbH, European Confederation of Medical Mycology, Gilead Sciences, GPR Academy Ruesselsheim, HELIOS Kliniken GmbH, Lahn-Dill-Kliniken GmbH, medupdate GmbH, MedMedia GmbH, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Scilink Comunicación Científica SC and University Hospital and LMU Munich; Participation on an Advisory Board from Ambu GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Mundipharma Resarch Limited and Pfizer Pharma; A pending patent currently reviewed at the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DE 10 2021 113 007.7); Other non-financial interests from Elsevier, Wiley and Taylor & Francis online. The other authors report no conflicts of interests related to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary tables S1-S6 and supplemtary figures S1-S6.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giacobbe, D.R., Dettori, S., Di Pilato, V. et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in intensive care units: a multicenter study by ESGCIP and EFISG. Crit Care 27, 323 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04608-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04608-1

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535