Skip to main content
Download PDF

Severe varicella-zoster virus pneumonia: a multicenter cohort study

Critical Care volume 21, Article number: 137 (2017) Cite this article

  • The Editorial to this article has been published in Critical Care 2017 21:230

Abstract

Background

Pneumonia is a dreaded complication of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection in adults; however, the data are limited. Our objective was to investigate the clinical features, management, and outcomes of critically ill patients with VZV-related community-acquired pneumonia (VZV-CAP).

Methods

This was an observational study of patients with VZV-CAP admitted to 29 intensive care units (ICUs) from January 1996 to January 2015.

Results

One hundred and two patients with VZV-CAP were included. Patients were young (age 39 years (interquartile range 32–51)) and 53 (52%) were immunocompromised. Time since respiratory symptom onset was 2 (1–3) days. There was a seasonal distribution of the disease, with more cases during spring and winter time. All but four patients presented with typical skin rash on ICU admission. Half the patients received mechanical ventilation within 1 (1–2) day following ICU admission (the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) = 150 (80–284), 80% with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.90 (1.33–2.70); p < 0.001), oxygen flow at ICU admission (OR 1.25 (1.08–1.45); p = 0.004), and early bacterial co-infection (OR 14.94 (2.00–111.8); p = 0.009) were independently associated with the need for mechanical ventilation. Duration of mechanical ventilation was 14 (7–21) days. ICU and hospital mortality rates were 17% and 24%, respectively. All patients were treated with aciclovir and 10 received adjunctive therapy with steroids. Compared to 60 matched steroid-free controls, patients treated with steroids had a longer mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay, and a similar hospital mortality, but experienced more ICU-acquired infections.

Conclusions

Severe VZV-CAP is responsible for an acute pulmonary involvement associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. Steroid therapy did not influence mortality, but increased the risk of superinfection.

Background

Pneumonia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. The importance of viruses as pathogens responsible for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been emphasized by several epidemic outbreaks over the last decade: severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), avian influenza A (H5N1) virus, and the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) [2,3,4,5]. It is estimated that about 200 million cases of viral CAP occur annually, accounting for 17 to 39% of CAP [6,7,8,9,10]. In the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, viruses have been reported to account for up to one-third of patients with severe CAP, with a similar mortality to that observed with bacterial pneumonia [11]. The availability of new molecular techniques (such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) has greatly increased our ability to detect a wide range of viruses in respiratory secretions [12,13,14,15]. Nevertheless, although convincing data are available for agents such as influenza virus or respiratory syncytial virus and their role in severe pneumonia, the role of other recently discovered viruses (bocavirus, coronavirus NL63) remains debated and requires further research [16,17,18,19].

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is one of eight herpes viruses known to cause human infection and is distributed worldwide. Varicella or chickenpox is defined as the VZV primo-infection. In adults, VZV infection is associated with a greater number of complications, of which pneumonia is the most common and serious. Since its initial description in 1942, VZV-related community-acquired pneumonia (VZV-CAP) has become increasingly recognized as a serious and potentially lethal complication of what was once considered a relatively benign and self-limited viral infection [20]. A study with systematic chest X-ray showed an incidence of 16.3% of VZV-CAP in adult patients [21]. Autopsy findings have demonstrated the role of VZV in fatal cases of pneumonia. Microscopic findings included pulmonary edema, extensive alveolar hemorrhage, and mononuclear cell infiltration with histological evidence of intranuclear inclusion bodies [22, 23].

Data on critically ill adult patients with VZV-CAP are limited to case reports and small case series. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical, biological, and radiological features and the outcome of severe forms of VZV-CAP (i.e., requiring ICU admission) in a large cohort and to report its implication for ICU management.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in 29 French adult ICUs (see Additional file 1: Table S1). This study has been approved by the French Intensive Care Society Ethics Committee (n°15-12) and an authorization to use patient data from the French Data Protection Agency (n°1868870). According to French law, a waiver of informed consent was obtained.

Inclusion criteria

All adult patients (≥18 years old) admitted for VZV-CAP in the participating ICUs between 1 January 1996 and 1 January 2015 were included. Patients were identified from the ICU databases using codes J171 and B012 from the International Classification of Diseases system (ICD-10) system. All the medical records of patients were reviewed by two investigators (AM and EC).

Data collection

The data reported in Tables 1, 2, and 3 were abstracted from medical charts. Chickenpox features at ICU admission were collected including skin rash, pulmonary involvement, neurological impairment, or abdominal symptoms. Patients were defined as immunosuppressed if they met one of the following criteria: hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation, hematological malignancy, solid tumor progressing or in remission less than 5 years, steroid treatment for more than 3 months, and other immunosuppressive drugs. Physiological variables, laboratory data, and radiographic findings (chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) when available) on ICU admission were also reported. Thrombocytopenia was defined as platelet count <150 G/l and hepatitis as alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase ≥3 N. Disease severity was assessed using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) on day 1 after ICU admission [24]. Patients were classified as having acute respiratory failure (ARF) if they met the following criteria: severe dyspnea at rest; a respiratory rate greater than 30 breaths/min or clinical signs of respiratory distress; and oxygen saturation less than 92% or arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) less than 60 mmHg on room air. Hypoxemia severity was assessed using the PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio [25]. The decision to perform fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (FO-BAL) and the use of life-sustaining treatments (i.e., noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and vasopressors) was left at the discretion of the attending physicians. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was defined according to the Berlin definition [26]. Therapeutic regimens were reported including antiviral therapy (molecule, dose, and length of treatment) and the use of steroids. High-dose steroids was defined as >30 mg per day of prednisone [27]. Patients receiving steroids were matched in a 1:6 ratio to a control group of patients within this cohort who did not receive steroids. The four matching criteria were: age, year of ICU admission, SOFA score on day 1, and ARDS criteria according to the Berlin definition.

Table 1 Univariate analysis of patient characteristics in intubated and nonintubated subjects
Full size table
Table 2 Characteristics of the pulmonary involvement (n = 102)
Full size table
Table 3 ICU management and outcome data
Full size table

ICU-acquired infections were recorded. The diagnosis of infection was confirmed if patients met both the following criteria: microbiological identification of a pathogen and administration of related antibiotic treatment.

ICU and hospital length of stays, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge were obtained in all patients.

Statistics

Patient characteristics at baseline and during ICU stay were described using medians and interquartile ranges for quantitative variables and counts and percentages for qualitative variables. Characteristics of patients requiring mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay were compared to those of patients without mechanical ventilation using either Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher’s exact test. To assess variables independently associated with the requirement for mechanical ventilation, baseline characteristics significantly associated with the requirement for mechanical ventilation were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Due to the small sample size, a forward stepwise p value-based variable selection was performed, and, when several highly correlated variables were associated with the requirement for mechanical ventilation, only one was included in the multivariable analysis based on clinical relevance. Missing covariates were handled using multivariate imputation by chained equations. Baseline and ICU management characteristics were also compared between deceased patients and those discharged alive. Cumulative incidence of death in the ICU and death in hospital were estimated considering discharge alive from ICU/hospital as competing events.

To assess the prognostic effect of steroid therapy in the context of an observational cohort, a matched comparison of patients receiving and not receiving steroids was performed. Patients receiving steroids were matched in a 1:6 ratio to a control group of patients within this cohort who did not receive steroids. The four matching criteria were: age, year of ICU admission, SOFA score on day 1, and ARDS criteria according to the Berlin definition.

Results

Clinical characteristics

During the study period, we identified 102 adult patients admitted to the ICU for the management of VZV-CAP. There was a seasonal distribution over the study period, with the highest incidence observed during winter and spring (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The median age was 39 (32–51) years and 53 (52%) patients were immunocompromised. Six (6%) cases of VZV pneumonia occurred in pregnant women (Table 1).

A typical chickenpox skin rash was reported in all but four (96%) patients and occurred 3 (2–5) days before the onset of respiratory symptoms. The median time from onset of respiratory symptoms to ICU admission was 2 (1–3) days. On admission, patients were severely hypoxemic with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 150 (80–284) mmHg and 6 (3–15) L/min oxygen flow. Respiratory symptoms included a cough in 45 (44%) patients, chest pain in 10 (10%) patients, and hemoptysis in 9 (9%) patients. ARF was noted in 69 (68%) patients (Table 2). In addition to skin and respiratory symptoms, 13 (13%) patients had encephalitis. Laboratory findings indicated thrombocytopenia in 81 (79%) patients and hepatitis in 34 (33%) patients. Blood PCR to amplify VZV DNA was always positive when performed (n = 15, 14.7%).

ICU management

The median SOFA score on day 1 was 4 (3–7). A chest CT was performed in 31 (30%) patients and was never normal. Common abnormalities were diffuse bilateral centrolobular nodules with tree-in-bud appearance (n = 14, 50%) and diffuse ground glass opacities (n = 11, 39%) (Fig. 1). Alveolar consolidations were also reported (n = 14, 50%). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed in 35 (35%) patients and demonstrated vesicular lesions or ulcerations on bronchial mucosa in 13 (36%) cases. PCR for VZV in the bronchoalveolar lavage was tested in 24 patients and yielded a positive result in 96% of cases. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation was implemented in 29 (28%) patients, failing in 19 (66%) who were subsequently intubated. Invasive mechanical ventilation was used in 52 (51%) patients overall, of whom 42 (80.8%) fulfilled the ARDS criteria according to the Berlin definition (Table 3). Patients were intubated 1 (1–2) day after ICU admission. Three factors were independently associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation: SOFA score on day 1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.90 (1.33–2.70); p < 0.001), oxygen flow at ICU admission (OR 1.25 (1.08–1.45); p = 0.004), and early bacterial co-infection (OR 14.94 (2.00–111.8); p = 0.009) (Table 4 and Fig. 2). Vasopressors were required in 36 (35%) patients and renal replacement therapy in 24 (24%). Among the 102 patients, 40 (39%) patients had documented bacterial co-infection with 20 (50%) early infections (documented within 72 h after ICU admission) and 20 (50%) late infections. The primary sources of co-infections were the lungs (n = 24, 60%), bloodstream (n = 8, 20%), and skin (n = 4, 10%), with Staphylococcus aureus being the most often recovered pathogen (n = 12, 30%). The median ICU and hospital length of stay were 8 (4–16.75) days and 14 (9–33) days, respectively. Duration of mechanical ventilation was 14 (7–21) days.

Fig. 1
figure1

Imaging characteristics from lung CT. A 46-year-old woman was admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure. She underwent kidney transplantation 12 years ago. She reported fever and a typical chickenpox skin rash 5 days before admission. The onset of respiratory symptoms started 2 days before ICU admission and invasive mechanical ventilation was implemented at day 1. She developed a severe ARDS requiring prone positioning, neuromuscular blockers, and 14 days of invasive mechanical ventilation. Lung CT scan demonstrated diffuse bilateral nodules, patchy ground glass opacities, and interlobular septal thickening. A fiber bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage documented a Staphylococcus aureus co-infection. She received intravenous aciclovir 10 mg/kg/8 h during 15 days associated with 10 days of oxacilline and was discharge alive from the ICU 17 days after admission

Full size image
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of factors associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation during ICU stay
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure2

Risk factors associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with VZV pneumonia. OR odds ratio, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

Full size image

Treatments related to VZV pneumonia and outcome

All patients were treated with aciclovir 10 mg/kg/8 h during 11 (9.2–14) days. One (1%) patient received a treatment with a varicella-zoster immune globulin preparation. High-dose adjunctive steroid therapy, in addition to antiviral therapy, was reported in 10 patients. Patients treated with high-dose steroids were no different compared to steroid-free patients regarding demographics, respiratory parameters on ICU admission, and ICU management (Table 5). Compared to steroid-free patients, steroid treatment was associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and prolonged ICU and hospital stays. ICU mortality was similar in the two groups (20% vs. 20%; p = 1.00). ICU-acquired bacterial infections were more frequently reported in steroid-treated patients (80% vs. 43%; p = 0.04) (Table 5).

Table 5 Characteristics of patients who received steroids (n = 10) compared to matched controlled patients (n = 60) who did not received steroidsa
Full size table

Overall ICU and hospital mortality were 17% and 24%, respectively, without significant variation over the study period (Additional file 3: Table S3). The main causes of death were: multi-organ failure in 10 patients (42%), refractory ARDS in 5 patients (21%), and septic shock in 4 patients (17%). One (4%) patient died from fulminant hepatic failure attributed to VZV infection and 1 (4%) patient died from brain edema. The cause of death was missing for 3 patients. By univariate analysis, factors associated with hospital mortality were: age (60 (49–72.5) vs. 36 (31–45); p < 0.0001), underlying immunosuppression (92% vs. 40%; p < 0.0001), SOFA score on day 1 (7 (5–10.75) vs. 4 (2–5.25); p = 0.0002), disseminated intravascular coagulation (42% vs. 4%; p = 0.0001), and empiric antibiotic treatment on ICU admission (91% vs. 53%; p < 0.0001) (Additional file 4: Table S2, Additional file 5: Figure S2, and Additional file 6: Figure S3).

Discussion

We identified 102 patients with severe forms of VZV-CAP who were admitted to 29 French ICUs. Underlying immunosuppression accounted for half of the patients we evaluated, mainly related to impaired cellular immune response (lymphoproliferative disorders, immunosuppressive drugs for solid-organ transplant recipients, and/or steroid exposure). Nevertheless, we identified severe illness from VZV-CAP among 11 (11%) young and healthy patients. More than half of the patients required invasive mechanical ventilation, of which 80% met ARDS criteria. Risk factors for intubation were related to the severity of the respiratory failure, the presence of an early bacterial co-infection, and the onset of other organ failures. In addition to antiviral therapy, high doses of steroids were used in 10 (10%) patients without benefit either on improvement of respiratory parameters or on mortality, and were associated with an increased number of superinfections.

There was a 5 (3–7)-day period of illness prior ICU admission, which is similar to influenza virus infection and other causes of viral pneumonia [5, 28, 29]. All patients but four presented with a typical chickenpox skin rash, suggesting that VZV-CAP is mostly a dreaded complication of primary VZV infection rather than recurrent VZV infection. The four patients without rash were all immunocompromised (solid cancer or hematological malignancy). Atypical cases of recurrent VZV infection with pulmonary involvement have been reported, almost exclusively in immunocompromised patients, and cannot be excluded in our study [30,31,32,33]. In addition, exogenous clinical reinfection by VZV has also been demonstrated and is thought to occur more likely in immunocompromised patients [30]. The illness course was characterized by a short period of acute and severe respiratory deterioration, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in half of the cases, shortly after ICU admission. We identified that risk factors for intubation were related to the presence of a bacterial co-infection, the severity of the respiratory failure, and the onset of other organ failures. Neither comorbidities nor underlying immunosuppression were independent predictors of invasive mechanical ventilation. These results are in agreement with previous studies suggesting that the underlying medical context was no longer significantly associated with the risk for intubation after adjustment for the severity of the acute disease [34,35,36]. The factors we identified are easy to assess at the bedside and may contribute to recognizing hospital admission patients who may benefit from early ICU admission.

In our study, the overall mortality was 24% and reached 43% in patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation. Viruses have been increasingly recognized as pathogens responsible for both severe community-acquired and healthcare-associated pneumonia [11, 29]. Choi et al. recently demonstrated in a prospective study that, in the ICU setting, the mortality rate of patients with viral pneumonia was similar to that of patients with bacterial pneumonia [11]. Nevertheless, most of our knowledge on severe forms of viral pneumonia is related to the influenza virus. We report that patients with VZV-CAP who required intubation experienced a long period of invasive mechanical ventilation (14 (7–21) days) and a high rate of bacterial co-infections (69%). These findings might be explained by the extent of skin and mucosal vesicular lesions. Indeed, previous clinical and autopsy studies have demonstrated that these lesions are responsible for necrotic and hemorrhagic foci distributed both in the upper airways and in the lower respiratory tract that may promote bacterial co-infection [37, 38]. In our study, 36% of the patients who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy had vesicular lesions on bronchial mucosa.

In addition to antiviral therapy, the use of steroids has been reported by observational studies in the treatment of VZV pneumonia [39,40,41]. The role of steroids in the management of pneumonia remains controversial. On the one hand, steroids might have the potential to decrease intrapulmonary inflammation and thus to reduce some ARDS-related pulmonary lesions. But, on the other hand, steroids might increase immunosuppression, favor persistent viral replication, and promote superinfection. Based on the results of two randomized controlled trials, the benefit-to-risk ratio argues for its use in severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [42, 43]. A recent meta-analysis reported that it may decrease the risk of ARDS as adjunctive therapy in community-acquired pneumonia [44]. On the other hand, no benefit has been demonstrated with the use of steroids in influenza pneumonia [45]. In 1998, Mer and Richards [39] reported on 15 adult patients treated for VZV-CAP, six of whom received steroids in addition to antiviral therapy and supportive care. These six patients experienced clinical improvement, a significantly shorter ICU and hospital length of stay, and no mortality when compared to those who did not receive steroids. However, the study design precluded any robust conclusion. Another study from Saudi Arabia reported improvement in oxygenation parameters in 10 adult patients treated for VZV-CAP with steroids as adjunctive therapy [40]. This was not our experience in the present study. Ten patients received steroids 4.5 (1–15) days after ICU admission. We compared these 10 patients to 60 matched controls who did not receive steroids. There was no difference between the steroid group and the nonsteroid group in ICU and hospital mortality. However, patients treated with steroids had a longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, more bacterial superinfection, and an increased ICU and hospital length of stay than control patients not treated with steroids. Thus, our data did not report any benefit associated with the use of steroids as adjunctive therapy in severe VZV-CAP.

Our study has several limitations. First, given the retrospective design over a long period of time, supportive care practices may have changed throughout the study period and influenced the results. However, we report the largest study on the severe forms of VZV-CAP and we believe that it adds valuable data to the current knowledge. Second, we had no biological identification of VZV for all patients included our study. Nevertheless, clinical signs and symptoms of chickenpox are obvious in most cases and laboratory diagnosis is restricted to unusual cases. Thus, we can reasonably assume that the patients included in the present study had VZV-CAP. Third, due to the limited number of death we were unable to identify independent predictors of hospital mortality. However, we report predictors of invasive mechanical ventilation that conceivably may be related to mortality. Fourth, for the diagnosis of VZV-CAP we used a database encoded by physicians at patient ICU discharge and we cannot exclude that some patients with VZV-CAP had been missed.

Conclusions

In conclusion, severe VZV-CAP in adults is an acute respiratory disease that requires invasive mechanical ventilation in more than half of the cases. Although underlying medical conditions or immunosuppression are common, healthy young individuals may be involved. We identified that respiratory disease severity, early bacterial co-infection, and other organ failures on ICU admission were independent risk factors for invasive mechanical ventilation. Early recognition of these factors may help to identify patients that may benefit from close monitoring to ensure that no treatment delay occurs when intubation is required. Adjunctive steroid therapy did not influence mortality and increased the risk of superinfection.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ARF:

Acute respiratory failure

CAP:

Community-acquired pneumonia

CT:

Computed tomography

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

FO-BAL:

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage

ICD-10:

International Classification of Diseases

ICU:

Intensive care unit

OR:

Odds ratio

PaO2 :

Arterial oxygen partial pressure

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SARS:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

VZV:

Varicella-zoster virus

References

  1. 1.

    WHO—The top 10 causes of death. WHO. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/.

  2. 2.

    Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1953–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Beigel JH, Farrar J, Han AM, et al. Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(13):1374–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D. Ponce de Leon S, et al. Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):680–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Influenza Investigators ANZIC, Webb SAR, Pettilä V, et al. Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(20):1925–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ruuskanen O, Lahti E, Jennings LC, et al. Viral pneumonia. Lancet. 2011;377(9773):1264–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Johnstone J, Majumdar SR, Fox JD, et al. Viral infection in adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: prevalence, pathogens, and presentation. Chest. 2008;134(6):1141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Johansson N, Kalin M, Tiveljung-Lindell A, et al. J. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: increased microbiological yield with new diagnostic methods. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(2):202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Widmer K, Zhu Y, Williams JV, et al. Rates of hospitalizations for respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and influenza virus in older adults. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(1):56–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wiemken T, Peyrani P, Bryant K, et al. Incidence of respiratory viruses in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit: results from the Severe Influenza Pneumonia Surveillance (SIPS) project. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(5):705–10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Choi S-H, Hong S-B, Ko G-B, et al. Viral infection in patients with severe pneumonia requiring intensive care unit admission. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(4):325–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jennings LC, Anderson TP, Beynon KA, et al. Incidence and characteristics of viral community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Thorax. 2008;63(1):42–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Crowe JE. Human metapneumovirus as a major cause of human respiratory tract disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(11 Suppl):S215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Arnold JC, Singh KK, Spector SA, et al. Human bocavirus: prevalence and clinical spectrum at a children’s hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(3):283–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    van der Hoek L, Pyrc K, Berkhout B. Human coronavirus NL63, a new respiratory virus. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006;30(5):760–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kupfer B, Vehreschild J, Cornely O, et al. Severe pneumonia and human bocavirus in adult. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(10):1614–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Schildgen O, Müller A, Allander T, et al. Human bocavirus: passenger or pathogen in acute respiratory tract infections? Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(2):291–304.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lee J, Storch GA. Characterization of human coronavirus OC43 and human coronavirus NL63 infections among hospitalized children <5 years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(8):814–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Galante O, Avni YS, Fuchs L, et al. Coronavirus NL63-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;193(1):100–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Waring JJ, Neubuerger K, Geever EF. Severe forms of chickenpox in adults: with autopsy observations in a case with associated pneumonia and encephalitis. Arch Intern Med. 1942;69(3):384–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Weber DM, Pellecchia JA. Varicella pneumonia: study of prevalence in adult men. JAMA. 1965;192(6):572–3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Krugman S, Goodrich CH, Ward R. Primary varicella pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1957;257(18):843–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Miliauskas JR, Webber BL. Disseminated varicella at autopsy in children with cancer. Cancer. 1984;53(7):1518–25.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vincent J-L, Rello J, Marshall J, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA. 2009;302(21):2323–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Definition Task Force ARDS, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Buttgereit F, Silva JAPD, Boers M, et al. Standardised nomenclature for glucocorticoid dosages and glucocorticoid treatment regimens: current questions and tentative answers in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(8):718–22.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Domínguez-Cherit G, Lapinsky SE, Macias AE, et al. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. JAMA. 2009;302(17):1880–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cesario TC. Viruses associated with pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(1):107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, Gelb L. Clinical reinfection with varicella-zoster virus. J Infect Dis. 1984;149(2):137–42.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Junker AK, Angus E, Thomas EE. Recurrent varicella-zoster virus infections in apparently immunocompetent children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10(8):569–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Junker K, Avnstorp C, Nielsen CM, et al. Reinfection with varicella-zoster virus in immunocompromised patients. Curr Probl Dermatol. 1989;18:152–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Junker AK, Tilley P. Varicella-zoster virus antibody avidity and IgG-subclass patterns in children with recurrent chickenpox. J Med Virol. 1994;43(2):119–24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lemiale V, Lambert J, Canet E, et al. Identifying cancer subjects with acute respiratory failure at high risk for intubation and mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2014;59(10):1517–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Adda M, Coquet I, Darmon M, et al. Predictors of noninvasive ventilation failure in patients with hematologic malignancy and acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(10):2766–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Antonelli M, Conti G, Moro ML, et al. Predictors of failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a multi-center study. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(11):1718–28.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Feldman S. Varicella-zoster virus pneumonitis. Chest. 1994;106(1 Suppl):22S–7S.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Aebi C, Ahmed A, Ramilo O. Bacterial complications of primary varicella in children. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23(4):698–705.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mer M, Richards GA. Corticosteroids in life-threatening varicella pneumonia. Chest. 1998;114(2):426–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Adhami N, Arabi Y, Raees A, et al. Effect of corticosteroids on adult varicella pneumonia: cohort study and literature review. Respirol Carlton Vic. 2006;11(4):437–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Anwar SK, Masoodi I, Alfaifi A, et al. Combining corticosteroids and acyclovir in the management of varicella pneumonia: a prospective study. Antivir Ther. 2014;19(2):221–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gagnon S, Boota AM, Fischl MA, et al. Corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for severe Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(21):1444–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bozzette SA, Sattler FR, Chiu J, et al. A controlled trial of early adjunctive treatment with corticosteroids for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. California Collaborative Treatment Group. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(21):1451–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wan Y-D, Sun T-W, Liu Z-Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2016;149(1):209–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Delaney JW, Pinto R, Long J, et al. The influence of corticosteroid treatment on the outcome of influenza A(H1N1pdm09)-related critical illness. Crit Care. 2016;20:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

AM, JL, PPi, and EC made substantial contributions to the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. They drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content. They gave final approval of the version to be published. They agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. PV, RR, LP, GG, PB, CGui, CGué, NB, AR, AL, KR, MF, JDR, ASe, BS, ASM, SF, AM, JMay, FS, ASt, PPe, JMai, DS, FG, LA, GB, FB, and GC made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data for the work. They revised the work critically for important intellectual content. They gave final approval of the version to be published. They agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the French Intensive Care Society Ethics Committee (n°15-12) and an authorization to use patient data from the French Data Protection Agency (n°1868870). According to French law, a waiver of informed consent was obtained.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Service de réanimation médicale, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Adrien Mirouse & Emmanuel Canet

  2. Service de réanimation polyvalente, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France

    Philippe Vignon

  3. CIC1435 CHU Limoges, Limoges, France

    Philippe Vignon

  4. INSERM U1092, Limoges, France

    Philippe Vignon

  5. Département de biostatistiques, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Prescillia Piron & Jérôme Lambert

  6. Service de réanimation médicale, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

    René Robert

  7. Service de réanimation des détresses respiratoires et infections sévères, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France

    Laurent Papazian

  8. Service de réanimation médicale, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Guillaume Géri

  9. Service de réanimation médico-chirurgicale, CH de Pontoise, Pontoise, France

    Pascal Blanc

  10. Service de réanimation médicale, CHU Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France

    Christophe Guitton

  11. Réanimation médicale, Groupement hospitalier nord, Hospices civiles de Lyon, Université de Lyon, INSERM 955, Lyon, France

    Claude Guérin

  12. Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Naïke Bigé

  13. Service de réanimation pneumologique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Antoine Rabbat & Aurélie Lefebvre

  14. Service de réanimation médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France

    Keyvan Razazi

  15. Service de réanimation médico-chirurgicale, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Muriel Fartoukh

  16. Service de réanimation médicale, Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Eric Mariotte & Lila Bouadma

  17. Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier, F-92700, Colombes, France

    Jean-Damien Ricard

  18. Université Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, AP-HP, F-75018, Paris, France

    Jean-Damien Ricard

  19. Service de réanimation médicale, CHU de Caen, Caen, France

    Amélie Seguin

  20. Service de réanimation médicale, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Bertrand Souweine

  21. Service de réanimation polyvalente, CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France

    Anne-Sophie Moreau

  22. Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d’organes, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

    Stanislas Faguer

  23. Service de Réanimation Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

    Arnaud Mari

  24. Service de pneumologie et réanimation médicale, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Julien Mayaux

  25. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de Hautepierre, U1121 et FMTS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    Francis Schneider

  26. Service de réanimation et surveillance continue, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France

    Annabelle Stoclin

  27. Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital Brabois, Nancy, France

    Pierre Perez

  28. Service de réanimation médicale, CHU de Picardie, Amiens, France

    Julien Maizel

  29. Service de réanimation médico-chirurgicale, hôpital d’Angoulême, Angoulême, France

    Charles Lafon

  30. Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital E. Muller, Mulhouse, France

    Frédérique Ganster

  31. Service de réanimation médicale, Hôpital E. Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

    Laurent Argaud

  32. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France

    Christophe Girault

  33. UPRES EA 3830-IRIB, Institute for Biomedical Research, Rouen University, Rouen, France

    Christophe Girault

  34. Service de réanimation médicale, hôpital La Source, Orléans, France

    François Barbier

  35. Service de réanimation polyvalente, CH Sud Francilien, Corbeil-Essonnes, France

    Lucien Lecuyer

Authors
  1. Adrien Mirouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philippe Vignon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prescillia Piron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. René Robert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laurent Papazian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guillaume Géri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pascal Blanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christophe Guitton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Claude Guérin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Naïke Bigé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Antoine Rabbat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Aurélie Lefebvre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Keyvan Razazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Muriel Fartoukh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Eric Mariotte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Lila Bouadma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jean-Damien Ricard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Amélie Seguin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Bertrand Souweine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Anne-Sophie Moreau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Stanislas Faguer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Arnaud Mari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Julien Mayaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Francis Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Annabelle Stoclin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Pierre Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Julien Maizel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Charles Lafon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Frédérique Ganster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Laurent Argaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Christophe Girault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. François Barbier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Lucien Lecuyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Jérôme Lambert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Emmanuel Canet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Canet.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Participating centers (n = 29) with the number of cases of VZV pneumonia during the study period (1996–2016). (DOC 45 kb)

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Seasonal distribution of VZV pneumonia from 1996 to 2015. (TIFF 731 kb)

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Mortality evolution during the study period. (DOC 28 kb)

Additional file 4: Table S2.

Univariate analysis of patient characteristics associated with hospital mortality. (DOC 39 kb)

Additional file 5: Figure S2.

Influence of age on mortality in patients with VZV pneumonia. (TIFF 675 kb)

Additional file 6: Figure S3.

Influence of underlying immunosuppression on mortality in patients with VZV pneumonia. (PDF 1968 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirouse, A., Vignon, P., Piron, P. et al. Severe varicella-zoster virus pneumonia: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care 21, 137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1731-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Varicella-Zoster virus
  • Pneumonia
  • Steroids
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Intensive care unit

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535