Open Access

Phenotype changes and impaired function of dendritic cell subsets in patients with sepsis: a prospective observational analysis

  • Holger Poehlmann^1,
  • Joerg C Schefold1, 2,
  • Heidrun Zuckermann-Becker3,
  • Hans-Dieter Volk1, 4 and
  • Christian Meisel1Email author
^Deceased
Critical Care200913:R119

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7969

Received: 19 March 2009

Accepted: 15 July 2009

Published: 15 July 2009

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with sepsis often demonstrate severely impaired immune responses. The hallmark of this state of immunoparalysis is monocytic deactivation characterized by decreased human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression and reduced production of proinflammatory cytokines. Recently, diminished numbers of dendritic cells (DCs) were reported in patients with sepsis. However, little is known about DC phenotype and function in human sepsis. We therefore compared phenotypic and functional changes in monocyte and DC subsets in patients with sepsis and immunoparalysis.

Methods

In a prospective observational analysis, 16 consecutive patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (age 59.2 ± 9.7 years, 13 male, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score 6.1 ± 2.7) and immunoparalysis (monocytic HLA-DR expression < 5,000 antibodies/cell) and 16 healthy volunteers were included. Peripheral blood DC counts, HLA-DR expression and ex vivo cytokine production were evaluated in comparison with monocyte subsets over time.

Results

At baseline, a profound reduction in the numbers of myeloid DCs (MDCs), plasmacytoid DCs (PDCs), and CD14dimCD16positive monocytes was observed in sepsis whereas CD14brightCD16negative and CD14brightCD16positive monocyte numbers were increased. HLA-DR expression was reduced on all monocyte and DC subsets. Production of proinflammatory cytokines and intracellular cytokine staining in response to lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid was impaired in monocyte subsets and MDCs, whereas IL-10 secretion was increased. IFNα response by stimulated PDCs was significantly decreased compared with controls. At day 28, HLA-DR expression and cytokine production of DC and monocyte subsets remained lower in septic patients compared with controls.

Conclusions

In sepsis, long-lasting functional deactivation is common to all circulating monocyte and DC subsets. In addition to decreased peripheral blood DC counts, functional impairment of antigen-presenting cells may contribute to an impaired antimicrobial defense in sepsis.

Introduction

Sepsis is a major medical challenge with a high annual incidence rate. Despite improvements in critical care, however, the outcome from sepsis has improved little and mortality rates remain high [13]. Earlier, the prevailing theory was that mortality from sepsis largely is a consequence of an overwhelming host inflammatory response [46]. Failure of clinical trials targeting inflammatory mediators to improve the outcome from sepsis and recent insights prompted reconsideration of this concept [48]. Today, it is recognized that the host's immune response during sepsis changes over time, resulting in both inflammation and profound immunosuppression in the later course of the disease. Many patients surviving the early phase of sepsis therefore often show signs of severe immunosuppression [46, 916].

A number of immune dysfunctions have been reported in sepsis, including apoptosis of T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes, altered cellular cytokine production, increased levels of the anti-inflammatory IL-10, impaired phagocytosis, monocyte deactivation with diminished major histocompatibility class II molecule expression, and altered response to microbial products [1722]. The term immunoparalysis was proposed to describe the host's general inability to mount effective immune responses. We and other workers have demonstrated an association between low levels of the major histocompatibility complex class II molecule human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR on monocytes and the impairment of cellular immunity in sepsis, including decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines, impaired antigen presentation, and reduced ex vivo lymphocyte response to recall antigens [9, 20, 23, 24]. Importantly, prolonged downregulation of monocytic HLA-DR was associated with an adverse outcome from sepsis [20, 24]. Consequently, a number of clinical pilot trials aiming to reverse immunoparalysis via immunomodulatory strategies were recently performed [9, 25, 26].

In contrast to the extensively studied major population of classical CD14bright monocytes, little is known about phenotypic and functional changes of CD16positive (Fcγ receptor III) monocyte subsets in sepsis. In healthy individuals about 10 to 15% of circulating monocytes are CD16positive cells, which express higher levels of HLA-DR and proinflammatory cytokines than CD16negative monocytes after stimulation with microbial products. This CD16positive subset has therefore been referred to as proinflammatory monocytes [2729]. Although expansion of CD16positive monocytes was shown in sepsis [30], it is currently unclear whether this subset undergoes functional deactivation similar to classical CD14brightCD16negative monocytes in sepsis.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and play a key role in linking innate and adaptive host immune responses to microorganisms. Distinct subsets of circulating DCs can be identified in peripheral blood, including myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs) and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) [31]. Although arising from common precursor cells in the bone marrow, MDCs and PDCs are phenotypically and functionally different [32]. For example, PDCs but not MDCs express the receptor for dsDNA (Toll-like receptor (TLR) 9), while TLR4, the receptor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is restricted to MDCs [31]. Activation of MDCs by LPS via TLR4 results in the secretion of TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6, while PDCs secrete enormous amounts of IFNα after stimulation with the TLR9 ligand CpG oligonucleotides (ODN), and may play an important role in antiviral immunity [31, 33].

Upon encountering microbial products, DCs undergo phenotypic and functional maturation and migrate to secondary lymphatic organs, where they induce adaptive T-cell responses. Compromised DC function was associated with increased disease severity and adverse outcome in animal models of sepsis [3436]. Increased apoptosis of DCs has been demonstrated in spleens from patients with sepsis, and an early decrease in circulating DCs was shown to correlate with increased disease severity and mortality [37, 38]. Data on functional changes in DCs in sepsis patients, however, remain scarce.

The aim of the present study was to determine and compare phenotypic differences and functional changes in different monocyte and DC subsets over time in patients with sepsis and immunoparalysis.

Materials and methods

Study population and protocol

Sixteen consecutive patients (13 men, age 59 ± 9.7 years) with severe sepsis or septic shock and immunoparalysis hospitalized in the surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care academic centre were included between January 2004 and January 2005. Sixteen healthy volunteers (13 men, age 46 ± 11.4 years) served as controls.

During the study interval, a total of 22 intensive care unit patients were screened for the presence of immunoparalysis, and all patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria entered the analysis. The following inclusion criteria applied: age > 18 years, presence of severe sepsis or septic shock [39], and presence of immunoparalysis (monocytic HLA-DR expression < 5,000 antibodies/cell). Hepatitis B or hepatitis C patients, HIV patients and patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs (for example, steroids) were excluded.

Disease severity was assessed daily using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Clinical data, microbiological data and 28-day mortality were recorded. Blood samples were collected on the day after enrolment (baseline) and at study day 28. Informed consent was achieved from the patient or respective representatives. The study was performed in adherence with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee on human research.

Media and reagents

For ex vivo cell culture, RPMI 1640 medium (PAA Laboratories, Pasching, Germany) was used. The medium was tested for low TNF-inducing capacity (TNFα release < 10 pg/ml) in heparinized whole blood samples from healthy controls. Endotoxin (LPS) from Escherichia coli (L-4516) was purchased from Sigma (Steinheim, Germany) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from Staphylococcus aureus (DSM 20233) was a kind gift from Dr S. Morath (Konstanz, Germany). Commercially available ODN CpG 2336 (ODN class A), CpG 2243 (control class A), CpG 2395 (ODN class C) and CpG 2137 (control class C) were used (Coley Pharmaceutical, Kanata, Canada).

Determination of cytokine secretion by monocytes and dendritic cells

Heparinized blood was diluted 1:5 in RPMI without supplements and was incubated (6 hours, 37°C, 5% CO2) with 100 ng/ml LPS or 10 μg/ml LTA for cytokine measurement in the supernatants. For stimulation with ODN class A and ODN class C, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from heparinized venous blood samples by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cultured at a concentration of 2 × 106 cells/ml in supplemented RPMI 1640 medium and were stimulated with 1 μg/ml ODN class A, ODN class C, ODN control class A or ODN control class C. After incubation (24 hours, 37°C, 5% CO2) supernatants were separated from cells for cytokine measurement. Quantification of HLA-DR on circulating monocytes was performed using a standardized flow cytometric assay, as described elsewhere [40].

For enumeration of DC subsets, 150 μl whole blood was stained with FITC-conjugated antibodies against lineage markers (lin1) (mixture of anti-CD3/CD14/CD16/CD19/CD20/CD56), anti-CD123-PE, anti-HLA-DR-PerCP and anti-CD33-APC (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). PDCs were gated as lin1 -CD123+HLA-DR+ events, and MDCs as lin1 -CD33+HLA-DR+ events. After treatment with FACS Lysing Solution (BD Biosciences), at least 150 to 300 events per DC population were analyzed on a FACSCalibur using CellQuestPro (BD Biosciences) software. HLA-DR expression on DCs was measured as the mean fluorescence intensity. Absolute APC population frequencies were calculated as white blood cell counts multiplied by the ratio of the APC population over all leukocytes.

Intracellular cytokine staining by flow cytometry

For flow cytometric measurement of intracellular cytokines, heparinized blood samples were diluted 1:1 in RPMI without supplements and were stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS and 10 μg/ml Brefeldin A (Sigma) for 6 hours (37°C, 5% CO2). After stimulation, cells were washed and stained with anti-CD14-FITC, anti-HLA-DR-PerCP and anti-CD33-APC (BD Biosciences). Leukocytes were fixed and permeabilized with FACS Lysing Solution and FACS Perm2 (BD Biosciences), and were stained with anti-TNFα-PE, anti-IL-1β-PE, anti-IL-6-PE, anti-IL-10-PE (BD Biosciences) or murine IgG1-PE (Immunotech, Marseille, France) as control.

Detection of cytokines, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein

Cytokine production was assayed in culture supernatants and plasma by ELISA. Commercial kits were used to determine IFNα (PBL Biomedical Laboratories, Piscataway, NJ, USA), TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 in supernatants (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). IL-10 plasma levels were measured by ultrasensitive ELISA (lower detection limit, 0.78 pg/ml; Biosource, Nivelles, Belgium). Immunoluminometric assays (Lumi® PCT; Brahms, Hennigsdorf, Germany) were used to detect procalcitonin plasma levels. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured immunoturbidometrically in a certified laboratory.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analyses, SPSS for Windows software (version 12.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The Mann – Whitney U test was used for comparison between patients and controls. Wilcoxon's test was used for comparison between baseline and day 28 in the patient group. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Study population and follow-up

Sixteen consecutive patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and immunoparalysis were included (Table 1). The mean stay on the intensive care unit until inclusion was 3.2 ± 2.9 days and sepsis was diagnosed on the day of intensive care unit admission in all individuals. At inclusion, 10 patients had septic shock and received vasopressor (norepinephrine) support.
Table 1

Demographics of the study patients

Patient

Sex

Age (years)

28-day mortality

Site of infection

SAPS 2/SOFA score (baseline)

Disease severity

Cultures positivea

1

Male

62

Survivor

Pneumonia

45/5

Septic shock

Enterococcus aerogenes

2

Male

43

Nonsurvivor

Peritonitis

44/11

Septic shock

None

3

Male

64

Survivor

Necrotizing pancreatitis

38/7

Septic shock

Enterococcus cloacae

4

Male

54

Survivor

Peritonitis

52/2

Severe sepsis

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Candida albicans

5

Male

60

Survivor

Mediastinitis

22/5

Severe sepsis

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium

6

Male

75

Survivor

Pneumonia

42/8

Septic shock

Escherichia coli

7

Female

59

Survivor

Peritonitis

33/4

Severe sepsis

Enterococcus faecalis

8

Male

64

Nonsurvivor

Pneumonia

30/4

Septic shock

E. cloacae

9

Male

46

Survivor

Necrotizing pancreatitis

29/11

Septic shock

P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus

10

Male

66

Survivor

Pneumonia

29/7

Septic shock

Klebsiella oxytoca

11

Female

53

Survivor

Pneumonia

33/9

Septic shock

Klebsiella pneumoniae

12

Male

52

Survivor

Peritonitis

24/3

Septic shock

E. coli, P. aeruginosa

13

Male

54

Survivor

Mediastinitis

23/8

Severe sepsis

E. faecalis

14

Male

65

Nonsurvivor

Pneumonia

30/5

Severe sepsis

E. aerogenes

15

Male

79

Survivor

Graft infection

33/4

Severe sepsis

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus., E. faecium

16

Female

51

Survivor

Necrotizing pancreatitis

29 5

Septic shock

C. albicans, Staphylococcus aureus

SAPS 2, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. aIsolated microbes at the respective site of infection.

Disease severity scores improved slightly from baseline to day 28 (Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2, 33.5 ± 8.5 to 28.8 ± 11.9, not significant; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, 6.1 ± 2.7 to 4.8 ± 2.2, P < 0.05). The mean procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels decreased from baseline to day 28 (procalcitonin, 2,924 ± 3,860 to 445 ± 470 pg/ml, P < 0.01; C-reactive protein, 20.2 ± 9.4 to 10.6 ± 5.8 mg/dl, P < 0.01). IL-10 levels also decreased over time (20.2 ± 53.4 to 4.0 ± 2.0 pg/ml, P < 0.05).

The major etiology of sepsis was pneumonia (n = 6), peritonitis (n = 4), and pancreatitis (n = 3) (Table 1). In 15/16 patients, positive cultures (n = 8 Gram-negative, n = 4 mixed spectrum) of relevant microorganisms were recorded (Table 1). Gram-negative infection was associated with the presence of septic shock (P < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate was 19%.

Distribution of monocyte and dendritic cell subsets in sepsis

Three different monocyte subsets can be distinguished in peripheral blood according to their CD14 and CD16 surface expression [41] (Figure 1a and Table 2). At baseline, the frequency of CD14brightCD16positive monocytes was increased in sepsis patients compared with healthy controls (17.9 ± 6.2% vs. 6.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001; Figure 1a). In contrast, the proportion of CD14dimCD16positive monocytes decreased in sepsis patients (3.0 ± 5% vs. 6.4 ± 2.5% (controls), P < 0.001). The opposing changes in the two CD16positive monocyte subsets were also observed for absolute cell numbers, along with the typical increase in CD14brightCD16negative monocytes (Figure 1a). At day 28, cell counts of all monocyte subsets remained significantly different from controls (Figure 1a).
Figure 1

Circulating monocyte and dendritic cell subset frequencies in sepsis patients. Frequencies of circulating monocyte and dendritic cell subsets in patients with sepsis at baseline and at day 28 compared with controls. (a) Monocytes were gated using a forward scatter/side scatter plot and a CD14/CD33 scatter plot, where CD33negative cells (lymphocytes and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs)) as well as CD14negativeCD33bright myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs) were excluded from further analysis. According to their differential expression of CD14 and CD16, three monocyte subsets were defined: CD14brightCD16negative, CD14brightCD16positive and CD14dimCD16positive. Proportions and cell counts of each subset are given. (b) Dendritic cell subsets were defined as follows: PDCs were gated as lineage marker (CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD56)-negative (lin-) CD123+human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR+ cells, and MDCs as lin -CD33+HLA-DR+ cells. Absolute cell counts are given. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Table 2

Monocyte and dendritic cell subsets

Monocyte or dendritic cell subset

Surface marker expression

Properties

Classical monocytes

CD14brightCD16negative

Majority of circulating monocytes [2729]9

Inflammatory monocytes

CD14brightCD16positive

Produce high level of proinflammatory cytokines, increased in sepsis [2729]

Dendritic cell-like monocytes

CD14dimCD16positive

Morphological and functional similarities to dendritic cells [42, 43]

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells

lin1 -CD123+HLA-DR+

Produce high level of IFNα in response to viruses [3135]

Myeloid dendritic cells

lin1 -CD33+HLA-DR+

Potent antigen-presenting cells [3135]

lin1, lineage marker.

Human peripheral blood contains at least two distinct populations of DCs [42]. In the present study, PDCs (lin1-CD123+HLA-DR+) and MDCs (lin1 -CD33+HLA-DR+) were analyzed (Figure 1b). Compared with controls, both PDC and MDC counts in sepsis patients were lower at baseline (PDCs, 8.6 ± 4.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3 cells/μl, P < 0.001; MDCs, 13.5 ± 5.5 vs. 4.2 ± 4.5 cells/μl, P < 0.001; Figure 1b). Both DC populations recovered slightly until day 28 (PDCs, 3.8 ± 3.6 cells/μl; MDCs, 6.7 ± 5.1 cells/μl), but remained below corresponding control levels (both P < 0.001; Figure 1b).

HLA-DR expression on monocyte and dendritic cell subsets

Reduced monocytic HLA-DR expression is a hallmark of immunoparalysis. While previous studies have focused on HLA-DR expression on classical monocytes (CD14brightCD16negative), little is known about the regulation of HLA-DR on CD16positive monocyte and DC subsets in sepsis. In line with the inclusion criteria, HLA-DR on CD14brightCD16negative monocytes was strongly diminished in patients compared with controls (P < 0.001; Figure 2a). At day 28, HLA-DR expression on CD14brightCD16negative monocytes increased (P < 0.01) but remained below control levels (P < 0.001; Figure 2a). Only three patients reached persistent monocytic HLA-DR levels above the lower normal range (> 15,000 antibodies/cell), indicating recovery from immunoparalysis. No significant association between severity of immunoparalysis (that is, monocytic HLA-DR levels) and clinical outcome of patients was observed.
Figure 2

Diminished human leukocyte antigen-DR expression on circulating monocyte and dendritic cell subsets in sepsis patients. Diminished human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression on circulating monocyte and dendritic cell subsets in patients with sepsis at baseline and at day 28 compared with healthy controls. Monocyte and dendritic cell subsets were stained and gated as described in Figure 1. (a) The HLA-DR expression in each monocyte subset was quantified using a standardized assay as described in Materials and methods, and is given as HLA-DR antibodies per cell (Ab/cell). (b) For plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) and myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs), the HLA-DR expression is given as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Similar to classical monocytes, HLA-DR expression on the CD14brightCD16positive monocyte subset was approximately eightfold reduced in comparison with controls (P < 0.001) at baseline, and remained significantly different from control levels at day 28 (Figure 2a). In contrast, HLA-DR downregulation on CD14dimCD16positive monocytes was less pronounced (1.5-fold compared with controls at baseline, P < 0.01) and HLA-DR levels did not statistically differ from controls at day 28 (Figure 2a).

We found a significant downregulation of HLA-DR on both DC subsets in septic patients that was more pronounced on MDCs (Figure 2b): HLA-DR on MDCs averaged 174 ± 54 mean fluorescence intensity in sepsis at baseline and 497 ± 128 mean fluorescence intensity in controls (P < 0.001). This almost threefold reduction was not seen on PDCs, which showed an expression of 177 ± 66 mean fluorescence intensity at baseline compared with 239 ± 77 mean fluorescence intensity in controls (P < 0.05). At day 28, HLA-DR expression on MDCs slightly recovered (257 ± 105 mean fluorescence intensity) but remained significantly reduced when compared with controls (P < 0.01), while HLA-DR levels on PDCs (216 ± 97 mean fluorescence intensity) almost reached control levels (Figure 2b).

Cytokine secretion by monocytes and dendritic cells

To determine the functional status of APC subsets, we assessed the cellular cytokine secretion profile. First, the production of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 was analyzed in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures after stimulation with TLR ligands. Secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in cultures from septic patients was significantly diminished at both time points compared with cultures from controls (Figure 3a). In contrast, IL-10 secretion after LPS stimulation was significantly enhanced at baseline and day 28. Stimulation with LTA exhibited less biological potency than LPS, but revealed similar findings with significantly reduced levels of all three proinflammatory cytokines and a tendency towards increased IL-10 secretion in whole blood cultures from septic patients.
Figure 3

Cytokine production after stimulation of blood from sepsis patients using different Toll-like receptor ligands. Cytokine production after stimulation of whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with sepsis using different Toll-like receptor ligands. (a) Blood was drawn from healthy controls or patients at the indicated time points (baseline, day 28) and stimulated for 6 hours with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or lipoteichoic acid (LTA). Cytokine levels were measured in the supernatants by ELISA and were normalized to monocyte counts. (b) Simultaneously, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with either class A (2336) or class C (2395) oligonucleotides (ODN). After 24 hours, the concentration of IFNα in the supernatants was determined using ELISA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

The functionality of PDCs was assessed via TLR9 stimulation using CpG ODN. Three different classes of ODN (class A, class B, class C) have been identified and linked to preferential cytokine induction in either PDCs (class A) or B cells (class B), or both (class C). Because activation of TLR9 signaling by ODN in PDCs, but not in B cells, has been shown to specifically induce secretion of IFNα, we used class A and class C ODN for stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to determine IFNα secretion by PDCs. At baseline, IFNα secretion was depressed after stimulation with ODN class A (P < 0.001) as well as ODN class C (P < 0.001) when compared with controls. A significant recovery was observed at day 28 versus baseline for both ODN class A stimulation (P < 0.05) and ODN class C stimulation (P < 0.05), but IFNα levels remained lower than in controls (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05 for ODN class A and ODN class C, respectively). Reduced IFNα secretion is unlikely to be only due to the observed decrease in PDC counts, since IFNα release at baseline is decreased about ninefold and 11-fold for ODN class A and ODN class C, respectively, compared with controls whereas PDC counts were diminished by only fourfold. Similarly, PDC counts at day 28 in septic patients were twofold lower compared with controls, but IFNα secretion was reduced by fourfold for both ODN class A and ODN class C (Figures 2b and 3b).

Intracellular levels of cytokines in monocyte subsets and myeloid dendritic cells

To characterize the diminished cytokine production at the cellular level, APC subsets were analyzed by intracellular cytokine staining. Since identification of CD16positive monocyte subsets is impaired by the loss of CD16 expression shortly after LPS stimulation (data not shown), CD33 was used as an alternative marker. Classical CD14brightCD16negative and CD14brightCD16positive monocytes express high levels of CD33, whereas CD14dimCD16positive monocytes are CD33dim. This remains unchanged during LPS stimulation (data not shown) and enabled us to evaluate classical CD14brightCD33bright monocytes versus CD14dimCD33dim(CD16bright) monocytes. MDCs were identified by the lack of CD14 and higher CD33 expression compared with CD14bright monocytes.

At baseline, the percentage of TNFα-producing (P < 0.01) and IL-6-producing (P < 0.01) CD14bright monocytes was diminished after LPS stimulation in septic patients compared with controls, whereas no significant differences were observed for IL-1β and IL-10 producers (Figure 4). An increased proportion of TNFα-positive cells (P < 0.05), IL-1β-positive cells (P < 0.05) and IL-6-positive cells (P = 0.01) was observed at day 28 compared with baseline (Figure 4). In the CD33dim(CD16positive) monocyte population, a similar reduction in the percentage of cytokine-producing cells was observed at baseline, although this reached statistical significance only for TNFα (P < 0.05 vs. controls; Figure 4). In MDCs, the frequency of TNFα-producing cells (P < 0.005), IL-6-producing cells (P < 0.05) and IL-10-producing cells (P < 0.05) was significantly impaired at baseline compared with controls (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Lipopolysaccharide-induced intracellular cytokine expression in monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells in sepsis patients. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced intracellular cytokine expression in monocytes and in myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs) in patients with sepsis compared with healthy controls. (a) Unstimulated blood was stained for CD14, CD33 and CD16, and then monocyte subsets (region (R) 1, CD14brightCD33bright; R2, CD14dimCD33dim) and MDCs (R3, CD14dimCD33bright) were gated in a CD14/CD33 scatter plot for subsequent analysis of CD16 expression. This staining strategy allowed identification of CD16positive (CD14dimCD33dim) monocytes (R2) despite the loss of CD16 expression after LPS stimulation. (b) Blood was drawn from healthy controls and from sepsis patients, and was stimulated with LPS (6 hours) in the presence of the secretion blocker Brefeldin A. After surface staining for CD14, HLA-DR and CD33, cells were intracellularly stained for TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 using PE-labeled cytokine-specific monoclonal antibody or murine IgG1-PE as control. The percentage of cytokine-positive CD14brightCD33positive monocytes, CD14dimCD33dim monocytes and CD14negativeCD33bright MDCs is given. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

At day 28, the percentage of cytokine-positive cells after LPS stimulation was not significantly different (compared with controls) for all subsets despite strongly reduced cytokine levels in supernatants of LPS-stimulated or LTA-stimulated whole blood cultures (Figures 3 and 4).

Discussion

Altered monocyte function, including diminished HLA-DR expression and impaired proinflammatory cytokine response, was previously reported in patients with sepsis, severe trauma and major surgery. Such monocytic deactivation indicates a state of globally impaired immune functions and correlates with poor clinical outcome in critically ill patients. Nevertheless, whether this phenomenon is restricted to classical monocytes or is common to all monocyte and DC subsets is currently unclear. We demonstrate that sepsis-induced immune dysfunction affects all circulating myeloid APC subsets and that these functional alterations are long-lasting.

Today, it is well established that circulating monocytes represent a heterogeneous cell population. Among the antigenic markers, CD14 and CD16 (also known as Fcγ RIII) are commonly used to distinguish monocyte subsets (Table 2). In addition to the majority of monocytes that express high levels of CD14 but not CD16, a minor population of CD16positive monocytes was identified. These cells have characteristic expression patterns distinct from classical monocytes, including high HLA-DR expression. CD16positive monocytes may be subdivided into CD14bright and CD14dim cells. The latter subset has morphological and functional similarities to DCs, including a strong capacity to activate naïve T cells in vitro [42, 43]. Expansion of CD14brightCD16positive monocytes has been observed in patients with sepsis and other inflammatory conditions [30, 42, 43]. Little is known, however, of the functional changes including both cytokine production and HLA-DR expression in CD16negative and CD16positive monocyte subsets during the course of sepsis.

Consistent with previous reports, we observed a significant increase in the circulating numbers of CD14brightCD16negative and CD14brightCD16positive monocytes in sepsis. Unlike these monocyte subsets, CD14dimCD16positive monocytes were significantly decreased in our patient population. This is in contrast with previous data demonstrating an increase in both CD14bright and CD14dimCD16positive monocytes in neonates and children with sepsis [44], and may reflect age-related differences in the differentiation and/or survival of CD16positive monocytes.

Similar to classical monocytes, we observed that CD16positive subsets show signs of profound functional deactivation in sepsis. Although HLA-DR levels differ between respective subsets, HLA-DR was diminished in all monocyte subsets in sepsis at baseline. Notably, CD14dimCD16positive monocytes showed only a slight reduction of HLA-DR expression at baseline while HLA-DR levels of both CD14bright subsets remained significantly diminished in sepsis even at day 28. Moreover, consistent with previous data [9, 45], we observed significantly reduced proinflammatory cytokine production (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6) and increased anti-inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-10) after stimulation of whole blood with LPS and LTA in septic patients. Although we did not determine cytokine secretion in isolated monocyte subsets, we demonstrate reduced intracellular levels of TNFα and IL-6 in both CD16negative and CD16positive monocytes after LPS stimulation. Together with markedly diminished cytokine levels in the supernatants of LPS-stimulated whole blood cultures from septic patients (despite a significant increase in absolute numbers), this may indicate that both CD16negative and CD16positive monocytes undergo deactivation in sepsis.

Interestingly, in contrast to the markedly reduced cytokine levels in supernatants of stimulated whole blood cultures, differences in the percentage of cytokine-positive monocytes after LPS stimulation were less pronounced between patients and controls. Notably, the percentage of IL-1β-positive monocytes did not differ between septic patients and controls even at baseline, suggesting that proteolytic processing and/or secretion of IL-1β rather than synthesis and intracellular accumulation of inactive pro-IL-1β in monocytes are defective in sepsis. In fact, interference with the proteolytic cleavage of pro-IL-1β and secretion of mature IL-1β was proposed as a potential mechanism of the immunosuppressive effect of IL-10 [46]. In addition to defects in cytokine transcription and translation, reduced monocytic cytokine production in sepsis may result from impaired post-translational processes involved in cytokine secretion.

DCs are key players in innate and adaptive immune responses. During infection, tissue-resident DCs recognize characteristic microbial patterns resulting in the uptake of pathogens, maturation and migration of DCs to lymphoid tissue, and activation of T-cell responses. In mice, previous studies demonstrated extensive depletion of DCs in secondary lymphatic organs after endotoxin challenge and polymicrobial sepsis [34, 47, 48]. Markedly reduced numbers of DCs were also observed in the spleens of patients with sepsis [38]. In a mouse model of polymicrobial sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture, increased numbers of apoptotic CD11c+ DCs in mesenteric lymph nodes have been demonstrated as early as 24 hours after cecal ligation and puncture [34]. Moreover, reduced numbers of circulating DCs in patients have been observed within 24 hours after onset of septic shock [37]. These data indicate that DC apoptosis occurs early in sepsis, and prompted us to assess functional DC alterations in the course of sepsis. We observed a profound reduction in peripheral MDC and PDC counts in septic patients at baseline that remained significantly decreased on day 28 compared with controls. Whether this is due to ongoing DC apoptosis, due to increased migration of circulating precursor DCs into peripheral sites of inflammation or results from prolonged diminished re-population of DCs from the bone marrow, however, remains speculative [49].

To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate a marked and sustained functional impairment of circulating DC subsets in patients with sepsis. Similar to the phenotypic changes in monocytes resembling functional deactivation, peripheral blood DCs from septic patients showed a downregulation of surface HLA-DR expression and a reduced secretion of proinflammatory cytokines upon stimulation with microbial products. Relative to healthy controls, stimulation of MDCs from septic patients with LPS resulted in significantly reduced production of TNFα and IL-6, as indicated by intracellular cytokine staining. In addition, IFNα secretion by PDCs after stimulation with TLR9-activating CpG ODN was significantly decreased in sepsis, and this reduction exceeded (more than twofold) the decrease in PDC counts both at baseline and after 28 days.

Collectively, our data suggest a functional deactivation of both MDCs and PDCs during sepsis. Recent experimental findings provided experimental evidence for a crucial role of defective DC responses for the increased susceptibility to secondary infections during sepsis by demonstrating that increased mortality to an otherwise innocuous pulmonary Aspergillus fumigatus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge in post-septic mice can be reversed by adoptive therapy using bone-marrow-derived DCs [49, 50]. Moreover, significantly lower peripheral blood MDC and PDC counts have already been observed in nonsurvivors early after onset of septic shock [37]. Whether the loss of DC correlated to the persistence of primary infections or to the occurrence of opportunistic infections, however, was not investigated. Further studies are needed to elucidate the specific consequences of the sustained loss and dysfunction of circulating DC subsets for impaired antimicrobial defenses in sepsis patients.

The mechanisms leading to altered cytokine responses and diminished major histocompatibility complex class II expression in DCs during sepsis are incompletely understood. Recent experimental studies in vitro and in vivo have demonstrated that DCs, similar to monocytes, become tolerant after exposure to microbial products – resulting in reduced production of proinflammatory cytokines upon repeated stimulation [48, 51]. In addition to impaired cytokine responses, endotoxin-desensitized DCs were shown to be poor inducers of T-helper type 1 cell responses [51]. Tolerance induction in DCs was also shown for other TLR ligands, including CpG ODN [52]. The data presented here are consistent with a functional impairment of TLR4 and TLR9 agonist-induced cellular responses in MDCs and PDCs in patients with sepsis. In line with previous findings, we found increased IL-10 levels in septic patients at baseline and at day 28 [17, 21]. IL-10 might contribute to the observed downregulation of HLA-DR on monocytes and DCs via enhanced re-endocytosis and sequestration of HLA-DR in monocytes [17]. In line with recent findings demonstrating that IL-10 inhibits IFNα production in PDCs in vitro, we observed in our study an inverse correlation of IL-10 levels with CpG-induced IFNα production by PDCs (P < 0.001, Spearman rho = -0.83). Nonetheless, other factors including downregulation of TLR-receptor expression and altered TLR-induced signal transduction may play a role in monocyte and DC deactivation in sepsis [48].

Conclusions

We demonstrate a profound and sustained functional impairment of all circulating monocyte and DC subsets in patients with sepsis and immunoparalysis. Further studies are required to elucidate the individual role of different APC populations in the compromised antimicrobial defenses in sepsis, and to determine whether reconstitution of APC function by immunomodulatory interventions may improve sepsis outcome.

Key messages

  • Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock show profound deactivation of all circulating monocyte and DC subsets, including CD16positive monocytes, in MDCs and PDCs.

  • Phenotypic and functional changes of monocyte and DC subsets include reduced major histocompatibility complex class II expression and diminished production of proinflammatory cytokines, whereas IL-10 secretion is increased.

  • Functional changes in monocytes and DCs are long-lasting.

  • Further studies are required to elucidate the individual role of different APC populations for compromised antimicrobial defenses in sepsis.

Abbreviations

APC: 

antigen-presenting cell

DC: 

dendritic cell

ELISA: 

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FITC: 

Fluoresceinisothiocyanat

HLA: 

human leukocyte antigen

IFN: 

interferon

IL: 

interleukin

LPS: 

lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin

LTA: 

lipoteichoic acid

MDC: 

myeloid dendritic cell

ODN: 

oligonucleotides

PDC: 

plasmacytoid dendritic cell

PE: 

phycoerythrin

TLR: 

Toll-like receptor

TNF: 

tumor necrosis factor.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The present work is dedicated to Holger Poehlmann MD who died shortly after the preparation of the manuscript. The authors thank Dr S. Morath (University of Konstanz, Germany) for kindly providing LTA from S. aureus (DSM 20233). The authors furthermore thank all intensive care unit staff for their dedicated help and support. Written consent for publication was obtained from the patient or their relative.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
(2)
Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
(3)
Department of General Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
(4)
Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic

References

  1. Angus DC, Pereira CA, Silva E: Epidemiology of severe sepsis around the world. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2006, 6: 207-212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B: EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30: 580-588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Engel C, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG, Brunkhorst R, Gerlach H, Grond S, Gruendling M, Huhle G, Jaschinski U, John S, Mayer K, Oppert M, Olthoff D, Quintel M, Ragaller M, Rossaint R, Stuber F, Weiler N, Welte T, Bogatsch H, Hartog C, Loeffler M, Reinhart K: Epidemiology of sepsis in Germany: results from a national prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33: 606-618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon JM: Septic shock. Lancet 2005, 365: 63-78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen J: The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature 2002, 420: 885-891.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE: The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2003, 348: 138-150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlet J, Cohen J, Calandra T, Opal SM, Masur H: Sepsis: time to reconsider the concept. Crit Care Med 2008, 36: 964-966.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schefold JC, Hasper D, Reinke P, Monneret G, Volk HD: Consider delayed immunosuppression into the concept of sepsis [Letter]. Crit Care Med 2008, 36: 3118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Docke WD, Randow F, Syrbe U, Krausch D, Asadullah K, Reinke P, Volk HD, Kox W: Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: restoration by IFN-gamma treatment. Nat Med 1997, 3: 678-681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ertel W, Kremer JP, Kenney J, Steckholzer U, Jarrar D, Trentz O, Schildberg FW: Downregulation of proinflammatory cytokine release in whole blood from septic patients. Blood 1995, 85: 1341-1347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fumeaux T, Dufour J, Stern S, Pugin J: Immune monitoring of patients with septic shock by measurement of intraleukocyte cytokines. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30: 2028-2037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Munford RS, Pugin J: Normal responses to injury prevent systemic inflammation and can be immunosuppressive. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 163: 316-321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Oberholzer A, Oberholzer C, Moldawer LL: Sepsis syndromes: understanding the role of innate and acquired immunity. Shock 2001, 16: 83-96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schefold JC, Hasper D, Volk HD, Reinke P: Sepsis: time has come to focus on the later stages. Med Hypotheses 2008, 71: 203-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Volk HD, Reinke P, Docke WD: Clinical aspects: from systemic inflammation to 'immunoparalysis'. Chem Immunol 2000, 74: 162-177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Volk HD, Reinke P, Krausch D, Zuckermann H, Asadullah K, Muller JM, Docke WD, Kox WJ: Monocyte deactivation – rationale for a new therapeutic strategy in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 1996,22(Suppl 4):S474-S481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fumeaux T, Pugin J: Role of interleukin-10 in the intracellular sequestration of human leukocyte antigen-DR in monocytes during septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 166: 1475-1482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, Schmieg RE Jr, Hui JJ, Chang KC, Osborne DF, Freeman BD, Cobb JP, Buchman TG, Karl IE: Sepsis-induced apoptosis causes progressive profound depletion of B and CD4 + T lymphocytes in humans. J Immunol 2001, 166: 6952-6963.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Monneret G, Finck ME, Venet F, Debard AL, Bohe J, Bienvenu J, Lepape A: The anti-inflammatory response dominates after septic shock: association of low monocyte HLA-DR expression and high interleukin-10 concentration. Immunol Lett 2004, 95: 193-198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Monneret G, Lepape A, Voirin N, Bohe J, Venet F, Debard AL, Thizy H, Bienvenu J, Gueyffier F, Vanhems P: Persisting low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression predicts mortality in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2006, 32: 1175-1183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Randow F, Syrbe U, Meisel C, Krausch D, Zuckermann H, Platzer C, Volk HD: Mechanism of endotoxin desensitization: involvement of interleukin 10 and transforming growth factor beta. J Exp Med 1995, 181: 1887-1892.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wesche DE, Lomas-Neira JL, Perl M, Chung CS, Ayala A: Leukocyte apoptosis and its significance in sepsis and shock. J Leukoc Biol 2005, 78: 325-337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Caille V, Chiche JD, Nciri N, Berton C, Gibot S, Boval B, Payen D, Mira JP, Mebazaa A: Histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-D related expression is specifically altered and predicts mortality in septic shock but not in other causes of shock. Shock 2004, 22: 521-526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Monneret G, Venet F, Pachot A, Lepape A: Monitoring immune dysfunctions in the septic patient: a new skin for the old ceremony. Mol Med 2008, 14: 64-78.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nierhaus A, Montag B, Timmler N, Frings DP, Gutensohn K, Jung R, Schneider CG, Pothmann W, Brassel AK, Schulte Am Esch J: Reversal of immunoparalysis by recombinant human granulocyte – macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2003, 29: 646-651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schefold JC, von Haehling S, Corsepius M, Pohle C, Kruschke P, Zuckermann H, Volk HD, Reinke P: A novel selective extracorporeal intervention in sepsis: immunoadsorption of endotoxin, interleukin 6, and complement-activating product 5a. Shock 2007, 28: 418-425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Belge KU, Dayyani F, Horelt A, Siedlar M, Frankenberger M, Frankenberger B, Espevik T, Ziegler-Heitbrock L: The proinflammatory CD14 + CD16 + DR ++ monocytes are a major source of TNF. J Immunol 2002, 168: 3536-3542.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Strobel M, Fingerle G, Schlunck T, Pforte A, Blumenstein M, Haas JG: Small (CD14 + /CD16 + ) monocytes and regular monocytes in human blood. Pathobiology 1991, 59: 127-130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Strobel M, Kieper D, Fingerle G, Schlunck T, Petersmann I, Ellwart J, Blumenstein M, Haas JG: Differential expression of cytokines in human blood monocyte subpopulations. Blood 1992, 79: 503-511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fingerle G, Pforte A, Passlick B, Blumenstein M, Strobel M, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW: The novel subset of CD14 + /CD16 + blood monocytes is expanded in sepsis patients. Blood 1993, 82: 3170-3176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shortman K, Liu YJ: Mouse and human dendritic cell subtypes. Nat Rev Immunol 2002, 2: 151-161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Onai N, Obata-Onai A, Schmid MA, Ohteki T, Jarrossay D, Manz MG: Identification of clonogenic common Flt3 + M-CSFR + plasmacytoid and conventional dendritic cell progenitors in mouse bone marrow. Nat Immunol 2007, 8: 1207-1216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Krug A, Rothenfusser S, Hornung V, Jahrsdörfer B, Blackwell S, Ballas ZK, Endres S, Krieg AM, Hartmann G: Identification of CpG oligonucleotide sequences with high induction of IFN-alpha/beta in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 2001, 31: 2154-2163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Efron PA, Martins A, Minnich D, Tinsley K, Ungaro R, Bahjat FR, Hotchkiss R, Clare-Salzler M, Moldawer LL: Characterization of the systemic loss of dendritic cells in murine lymph nodes during polymicrobial sepsis. J Immunol 2004, 173: 3035-3043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pichyangkul S, Endy TP, Kalayanarooj S, Nisalak A, Yongvanitchit K, Green S, Rothman AL, Ennis FA, Libraty DH: A blunted blood plasmacytoid dendritic cell response to an acute systemic viral infection is associated with increased disease severity. J Immunol 2003, 171: 5571-5578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Scumpia PO, McAuliffe PF, O'Malley KA, Ungaro R, Uchida T, Matsumoto T, Remick DG, Clare-Salzler MJ, Moldawer LL, Efron PA: CD11c + dendritic cells are required for survival in murine polymicrobial sepsis. J Immunol 2005, 175: 3282-3286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Guisset O, Dilhuydy MS, Thiebaut R, Lefevre J, Camou F, Sarrat A, Gabinski C, Moreau JF, Blanco P: Decrease in circulating dendritic cells predicts fatal outcome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33: 148-152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, Grayson MH, Osborne DF, Wagner TH, Cobb JP, Coopersmith C, Karl IE: Depletion of dendritic cells, but not macrophages, in patients with sepsis. J Immunol 2002, 168: 2493-2500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G: 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003, 31: 1250-1256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Docke WD, Hoflich C, Davis KA, Rottgers K, Meisel C, Kiefer P, Weber SU, Hedwig-Geissing M, Kreuzfelder E, Tschentscher P, Nebe T, Engel A, Monneret G, Spittler A, Schmolke K, Reinke P, Volk HD, Kunz D: Monitoring temporary immunodepression by flow cytometric measurement of monocytic HLA-DR expression: a multicenter standardized study. Clin Chem 2005, 51: 2341-2347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang SY, Mak KL, Chen LY, Chou MP, Ho CK: Heterogeneity of human blood monocyte: two subpopulations with different sizes, phenotypes and functions. Immunology 1992, 77: 298-303.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas R, Lipsky PE: Human peripheral blood dendritic cell subsets. Isolation and characterization of precursor and mature antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol 1994, 153: 4016-4028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Gordon S, Taylor PR: Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol 2005, 5: 953-964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Skrzeczynska J, Kobylarz K, Hartwich Z, Zembala M, Pryjma J: CD14 + CD16 + monocytes in the course of sepsis in neonates and small children: monitoring and functional studies. Scand J Immunol 2002, 55: 629-638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Munoz C, Carlet J, Fitting C, Misset B, Bleriot JP, Cavaillon JM: Dysregulation of in vitro cytokine production by monocytes during sepsis. J Clin Invest 1991, 88: 1747-1754.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Grutz G: New insights into the molecular mechanism of interleukin-10-mediated immunosuppression. J Leukoc Biol 2005, 77: 3-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tinsley KW, Grayson MH, Swanson PE, Drewry AM, Chang KC, Karl IE, Hotchkiss RS: Sepsis induces apoptosis and profound depletion of splenic interdigitating and follicular dendritic cells. J Immunol 2003, 171: 909-914.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wysocka M, Robertson S, Riemann H, Caamano J, Hunter C, Mackiewicz A, Montaner LJ, Trinchieri G, Karp CL: IL-12 suppression during experimental endotoxin tolerance: dendritic cell loss and macrophage hyporesponsiveness. J Immunol 2001, 166: 7504-7513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Benjamim CF, Lundy SK, Lukacs NW, Hogaboam CM, Kunkel SL: Reversal of long-term sepsis-induced immunosuppression by dendritic cells. Blood 2005, 105: 3588-3595.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pene F, Zuber B, Courtine E, Rousseau C, Ouaaz F, Toubiana J, Tazi A, Mira JP, Chiche JD: Dendritic cells modulate lung response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a murine model of sepsis-induced immune dysfunction. J Immunol 2008, 181: 8513-8520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rieser C, Papesh C, Herold M, Bock G, Ramoner R, Klocker H, Bartsch G, Thurnher M: Differential deactivation of human dendritic cells by endotoxin desensitization: role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and prostaglandin E 2 . Blood 1998, 91: 3112-3117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Abe M, Tokita D, Raimondi G, Thomson AW: Endotoxin modulates the capacity of CpG-activated liver myeloid DC to direct Th1-type responses. Eur J Immunol 2006, 36: 2483-2493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Poehlmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.