Skip to main content
Download PDF

High-frequency oscillation and tracheal gas insufflation in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and traumatic brain injury: an interventional physiological study

Critical Care volume 17, Article number: R136 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), combined high-frequency oscillation (HFO) and tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) improves gas exchange compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). We evaluated the effect of HFO-TGI on PaO2/fractional inspired O2 (FiO2) and PaCO2, systemic hemodynamics, intracranial pressure (ICP), and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and concurrent severe ARDS.

Methods

We studied 13 TBI/ARDS patients requiring anesthesia, hyperosmolar therapy, and ventilation with moderate-to-high CMV-tidal volumes for ICP control. Patients had PaO2/FiO2 <100 mm Hg at end-expiratory pressure ≥10 cm H2O. Patients received consecutive, daily, 12-hour rescue sessions of HFO-TGI interspersed with 12-hour periods of CMV. HFO-TGI was discontinued when the post-HFO-TGI PaO2/FiO2 exceeded 100 mm Hg for >12 hours. Arterial/central-venous blood gases, hemodynamics, and ICP were recorded before, during (every 4 hours), and after HFO-TGI, and were analyzed by using repeated measures analysis of variance. Respiratory mechanics were assessed before and after HFO-TGI.

Results

Each patient received three to four HFO-TGI sessions (total sessions, n = 43). Pre-HFO-TGI PaO2/FiO2 (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 83.2 ± 15.5 mm Hg) increased on average by approximately 130% to163% during HFO-TGI (P < 0.01) and remained improved by approximately 73% after HFO-TGI (P < 0.01). Pre-HFO-TGI CMV plateau pressure (30.4 ± 4.5 cm H2O) and respiratory compliance (37.8 ± 9.2 ml/cm H2O), respectively, improved on average by approximately 7.5% and 20% after HFO-TGI (P < 0.01 for both). During HFO-TGI, systemic hemodynamics remained unchanged. Transient improvements were observed after 4 hours of HFO-TGI versus pre-HFO-TGI CMV in PaCO2 (37.7 ± 9.9 versus 41.2 ± 10.8 mm Hg; P < 0.01), ICP (17.2 ± 5.4 versus 19.7 ± 5.9 mm Hg; P < 0.05), and CPP (77.2 ± 14.6 versus 71.9 ± 14.8 mm Hg; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In TBI/ARDS patients, HFO-TGI may improve oxygenation and respiratory mechanics, without adversely affecting PaCO2, hemodynamics, or ICP. These findings support the use of HFO-TGI as a rescue ventilatory strategy in patients with severe TBI and imminent oxygenation failure due to severe ARDS.

Introduction

The management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) becomes challenging when complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [1, 2]. Hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and hypotension are rather frequent in ARDS, either as original clinical manifestations, or as consequence(s) of the conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) strategy [3–5]. TBI ventilatory goals include adequate oxygenation as well as CO2 elimination for the control of intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) [5, 6]. However, the use of moderate-to-high tidal volumes and high respiratory rates predisposes TBI patients to ventilator-induced lung injury [4, 5].

High-frequency oscillation (HFO) aims at optimizing lung protection [7–10] and recruitment [11]. However, data on the effects of HFO on PaCO2, hemodynamics, and ICP in patients with TBI and ARDS are sparse and originate from small, retrospective case series [12–14]. Increases in ICP secondary to transient increases in PaCO2 have previously been reported during HFO [12, 13]. Hypercapnia occurs commonly during HFO, even at relatively low HFO frequencies of ~5 Hz [15]. Conversely, the addition of tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) to HFO enhances CO2 elimination [16, 18], and improves oxygenation [16–19]. In the present study, we hypothesized that rescue sessions of HFO-TGI administered to TBI patients with severe ARDS could result in improved gas exchange, higher post-HFO-TGI respiratory compliance, and less-traumatic CMV pressures [19], without adversely affecting ICP and/or CPP.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted between June 2009 and June 2012 in the mixed medical and surgical 30-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of Evaggelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece. Informed, written next-of-kin consent was obtained for all participants. The study was approved by the Scientific Council and the Ethics Committee of Evaggelismos Hospital.

Patients

Eligible patients had early (that is, onset within ≤72 hours) ARDS [19, 20] with severe oxygenation disturbances (defined as PaO2/fractional inspired O2 (FiO2) ≤ 100 mm Hg at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥10 cm H2O), and severe TBI (that is, preintubation Glasgow Coma Score <8 [21]). Target ICP was ≤20 mm Hg; thus, the threshold for increasing therapy-intensity level (TIL) for ICP control was ICP > 20 mm Hg [5, 6, 22]. TIL comprised a minimum of head elevation (20 degrees to 30 degrees relative to horizontal), higher-dose sedation/neuromuscular blockade, hemodynamic support to maintain a target CPP of ≥60 mm Hg [5, 6, 22], hyperosmolar therapy, and prevention of hyperthermia ([23]; see also Additional file 1).

We applied previously published exclusion criteria ([19]; Additional file 1), in addition to ICP >30 mm Hg, and brain death or imminent risk of brain herniation. Patient monitoring included continuous display of electrocardiographic lead II and peripheral oxygen saturation, intraarterial blood pressure, cardiac output/index (PICCO-plus; Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany), core patient temperature, and ICP (Codman ICP monitoring system; Codman & Shurtleff, Raynham, MA, USA).

Study design

We conducted a prospective, interventional, noncontrolled study on the physiological effects of intermittent, rescue HFO-TGI in TBI/ARDS patients. In a recent randomized controlled trial of severe ARDS [19], we showed that 6 or more-hour HFO-TGI sessions (average daily HFO-TGI use, 12.4 hours) with recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are associated with significant improvements in oxygenation, plateau pressure, and respiratory compliance during postsession CMV versus presession CMV; HFO-TGI did not significantly affect hemodynamics. Our rescue intervention comprised daily, 12-hour sessions of HFO-TGI and RMs, interspersed with 12-hour periods of CMV (Figure 1). The rescue intervention was discontinued when a PaO2/FiO2 of >100 mm Hg could be maintained for >12 hours during post-HFO-TGI CMV, with CMV-plateau airway pressure of ≤35 cm H2O.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the study protocol. CMV, conventional mechanical ventilation; RM, recruitment maneuver; HFO, high-frequency oscillation; TGI, tracheal gas insufflation; mPaw, mean airway pressure; f, oscillation frequency; ΔP, oscillatory pressure amplitude; minV, minute ventilation; FiO2, fractional inspired oxygen. *Includes the (1) confirmation of correct positioning and patency of tracheal tubes by chest radiography and 10-second or less fiberoptic endoscopy, respectively [19–21, 23]; (2) introduction of a TGI catheter (through a dedicated circuit adapter) and positioning of the TGI catheter tip at 0.5 to 1.0 cm beyond the tracheal tube tip, as previously described [[18–20, 22]; Additional file 1]; and (3) minor ventilatory adjustments aimed at further, concurrent optimization of PaCO2, intracranial pressure, and plateau pressure (Additional file 1). This patient preparation was carried out once, immediately after study enrolment. †Period duration was as illustrated on study day 1; on a subsequent study day, it constituted a 60-minute pre-HFO-TGI CMV period that followed the 11-hour post-HFO-TGI CMV period of the preceding study day. §Depending on tracheal tube inner diameter (9.0, 8.5, or 8.0 mm) [17], the HFO mPaw was set at 10, 12, or 15 cm H2O (respectively) above preceding CMV mPaw [20]. ‡Performed by pressurizing the HFO breathing circuit at 40 to 45 cm H2O for 20 seconds with oscillator piston off. **Causing a 3- to 5-cm H2O decrease in mPaw, which was reversed by adjusting the mPaw valve; the tracheal tube cuff leak was placed immediately after the first RM. #PaCO2 of HFO-TGI was to be maintained within 30 to 50 mm Hg.

Full size image

Study protocol

Baseline CMV period

Details are provided in Additional file 1. On enrolment, patients were ventilated with attending physician-prescribed volume assist-control CMV. CMV settings were already titrated to the best possible combinations of PaO2/FiO2 (target ≥100 mm Hg, with PaO2 maintained >90 mm Hg [5, 22]), PaCO2 (target 35 to 45 mm Hg), plateau pressure (target, ≤35 cm H2O), and ICP/CPP. An arterial blood gas analysis was performed, respiratory mechanics were assessed with rapid end-inspiratory/end-expiratory airway occlusion [16–19], and the Murray score [24] was calculated.

Tracheal tube (inner diameter, 8.0 to 9.0 mm) correct positioning and patency were verified, and a circuit adapter/TGI-catheter system was inserted, as previously described [16–19]; Additional file 1. Sixty minutes thereafter, we conducted the study's baseline, physiologic CMV measurements (arterial/central venous blood gas analysis, hemodynamics and ICP, and respiratory mechanics) at FiO2 = 1.0 (Figure 1).

HFO-TGI and RMs protocol

Patients were connected to the 3100B HFO ventilator (Sensormedics; Yorba Linda, CA, USA), and after a 10- to 20-second period of standard HFO ventilation, a 20-second RM was performed by pressurizing the HFO breathing circuit at 40 to 45 cm H2O with the oscillator piston off. RMs were administered only to patients with ICP ≤25 mm Hg and CPP ≥60 mm Hg during pre-HFO-TGI CMV. RM-abort criteria were ICP increase to >25 mm Hg or CPP decrease to <60 mm Hg during an RM; whenever these criteria were met, RMs were suspended until the HFO-TGI session of the next study day.

Initial HFO settings (Figure 1) were aimed at optimizing lung recruitment and PaCO2 control. A tracheal tube cuff leak and TGI were used as previously described (Figure 1[16–19]; Additional file 1). For study purposes, we documented physiological measurements (arterial/central venous blood gas analysis, and hemodynamics/ICP) at 4, 8, and 12 hours after HFO initiation. The sequence of RMs, oxygenation-based titrations in mean airway pressure (mPaw), and PaCO2-based titrations of HFO frequency and oscillatory pressure amplitude (ΔP) is illustrated in Figure 1. If, at 12 hours, the PaO2/FiO2 was still <100 mm Hg, the daily HFO-TGI session was to be extended for at least 24 hours (that is, until the end of the next day's session [19]).

In the event that ICP would exceed the pre-HFO-TGI value by 5 mm Hg, or reach 30 mm Hg in absolute value for >15 minutes, the HFO-TGI session was to be interrupted, with consequent return to pre-HFO-TGI CMV and cancellation of any further HFO-TGI intervention. During HFO-TGI, any RM-and/or HFO-TGI-associated hypotension (defined as mean arterial pressure <70 mm Hg) lasting for >1 minute was to be treated with norepinephrine and/or a 300 to 500-ml bolus of crystalloid [19].

Post HFO-TGI CMV period

If, after 12 hours of HFO-TGI, PaO2/FiO2 exceeded 100 mm Hg, patients were returned to CMV with the pre-HFO-TGI settings (including the FiO2 = 1.0) maintained unchanged for 30 minutes. Subsequently, we performed the post-HFO-TGI physiological measurements. Furthermore, within the next 12 hours, CMV ventilatory settings and TIL for ICP control were retitrated as necessary, in concordance with the previously described targets and limits. Twelve hours after return to CMV, patients were assessed for return to HFO-TGI, according to the previously described, oxygenation/plateau-pressure criterion. The last 60 minutes of this CMV period corresponded to the pre-HFO-TGI CMV period of the subsequent study day (Figure 1). We conducted all daily, pre-HFO-TGI, physiological, CMV measurements with CMV FiO2 set at 1.0 for ≥15 minutes.

Data collection and statistical analysis

On each study day, we obtained physiological measurements over 5-minute periods at the previously mentioned five times (Figure 1). For each 5-minute period, continuously monitored variables were recorded once per minute and then averaged. Standard formula-derived variables included shunt fraction, peripheral O2 delivery rate, CPP, respiratory compliance, and oxygenation index (Additional file 1). Daily physiological data sets from each patient were pooled and analyzed.

We conducted a compromise power analysis (G*Power version 3.1; Duesseldorf University, Duesseldorf, Germany), For a small effect size f of 0.10, a beta-to-alpha ratio of 4:1, a total of 40 daily data sets (that is, observations), five levels of the within-subjects factor (that is, ventilatory technique), and a nonsphericity correction of 0.3 [17], the analysis yielded an alpha value of 0.044, and a power of 0.83. We estimated that each patient would require three or more HFO-TGI sessions [19], each corresponding to one study-data set [17]. Consequently, a minimum of 13 patients would be required for study completion.

Data were analyzed by using SPSS Statistics version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Distribution normality was tested by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Physiological variable data obtained at the reported measurement time points were compared with repeated measures analysis of variance for one within-subjects factor. The Bonferroni correction was used for pairwise post hoc comparisons. Pre-HFO-TGI and post-HFO-TGI CMV plateau pressure and respiratory-compliance data were compared with a paired t test. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

During the study period, we administered rescue HFO-TGI sessions to 13 eligible TBI/ARDS patients. Table 1 displays baseline data of the patients, their Marshall score [25] on hospital admission and their neurologic outcome. On enrolment, six patients had ICP >20 mm Hg and/or CPP <60 mm Hg; average, total TIL score was 17.3 ± 5.1 (range, 11 to 28; Additional file 1, Table S1 [23]). Nine and four patients required a total of three and four daily HFO-TGI sessions (respectively), according to our prespecified oxygenation criteria. No need was seen for extension or interruption of any HFO-TGI session, and none of the HFO-TGI sessions was cancelled. In 13 (30.2%) of 43 HFO-TGI sessions, RMs were cancelled (n = 11) or aborted (n = 2) (see Additional file 1, Table S2).

Table 1 Patient baseline characteristics, ventilatory settings on study enrollment, and outcome
Full size table

Secondary insults, such as ICP >20 mm Hg, and CPP <60 mm Hg with/without concurrent hypotension, were recorded in 23 (53.5%) of 43 study days corresponding to nine (69.2%) of 13 patients. Insults were effectively treated with further increases in TIL. In all of these cases, at least one insult occurred during CMV. Insults during HFO-TGI were recorded in 19 (44.2%) of 43 study days and in seven (53.8%) of 13 patients (full relevant data reported in Additional file 1, Table S2). This is consistent with the subsequently reported improvements in ICP and CPP control observed during HFO-TGI. In three (7.0%) of 43 study days, concurrent increases in post-HFO-TGI PaCO2 (of >5 mm Hg) and ICP (to 23 to 26 mm Hg) were treated mainly by increasing CMV minute ventilation by 1 to 2 L/min (Additional file 1, Supplement to Results and Table S2).

We did not observe any of the potential HFO and/or TGI-associated complications [16–19], apart from transient hypotension within the first 2 minutes of HFO-TGI initiation. This protocol-related complication occurred just after the 20-second first RM in nine (20.9%) of 43 HFO-TGI sessions, corresponding to six (46.2%) of 13 patients. In all cases, the pre-HFO-TGI hemodynamic status was restored within 15 minutes after a temporary increase in vasopressor infusion and a fluid bolus (see Methods and Additional file 1, Supplement to Results and Figure S1).

Ventilatory parameters and results on physiological variables

We used CMV tidal volume, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and PEEP of 8.3 ± 1.3 ml/kg predicted body weight, 26.6 ± 5.0 breaths/min, 15.0 ± 2.9 L/min, and 14.6 ± 2.6 cm H2O, respectively. Table 2 displays the HFO-TGI settings (along with CMV mPaw; see also Figure 1), results on oxygenation index, and CMV respiratory mechanics. HFO-TGI resulted in significant improvements in plateau pressure and respiratory compliance (P < 0.01).

Table 2 Ventilatory parameters of HFO-TGI sessions, oxygenation index, and respiratory mechanics.
Full size table

Results on PaO2/FiO2, PaCO2, pH, and cerebral hemodynamics are shown in Figure 2. PaO2/FiO2 was higher during HFO-TGI sessions versus pre-/post-HFO-TGI CMV (P < 0.01). Furthermore, PaO2/FiO2 remained higher during post-HFO-TGI CMV versus pre-HFO-TGI CMV (P < 0.01). Accordingly, HFO-TGI was associated with significant improvements in oxygenation index (Table 2), shunt fraction, central-venous O2 saturation, and peripheral O2 delivery (Table 3). Furthermore, PaCO2 and pH were improved after 4 hours of HFO-TGI relative to pre/post HFO-TGI CMV, and after 8 hours of HFO-TGI relative to post-HFO-TGI CMV (Figure 2). ICP and CPP were also improved after 4 hours of HFO-TGI relative to pre/post HFO-TGI CMV (Figure 2). Last, besides the RM-associated hypotension, HFO-TGI did not affect systemic hemodynamics (Table 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Results on gas-exchange and cerebral hemodynamics. CMV, conventional mechanical ventilation; HFO, high-frequency oscillation; TGI, tracheal gas insufflation; pre-HFO-TGI CMV corresponds to either the baseline CMV period of study day 1, or the 60-minute period that followed the 11-hour period of post-HFO-TGI CMV of the preceding study day (see also Figure 1 and corresponding legend). Left: results on PaO2/fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) (top diagram), PaCO2 (middle diagram), and arterial pH (bottom diagram) obtained, during CMV1 (that is, just before HFO-TGI initiation), HFO-TGI at 4, 8, and 12 hours, and CMV2 (that is, at 30 minutes after HFO-TGI discontinuation; see also Figure 1 and corresponding legend). Right: results on intracranial pressure (top diagram) and cerebral perfusion pressure (bottom diagram) also obtained at the previously mentioned time points. Squares and error bars represent mean and SD, respectively. *P < 0.01 versus pre-HFO-TGI CMV. †P < 0.01 versus post-HFO-TGI CMV. §P < 0.05 versus pre-HFO-TGI CMV and post-HFO-TGI CMV. ‡P < 0.05 versus pre-HFO-TGI CMV.

Full size image
Table 3 Shunt fraction, peripheral perfusion indices, and hemodynamics
Full size table

Discussion

Our results support the use of HFO-TGI as rescue ventilatory strategy in patients with severe TBI and imminent oxygenation failure due to severe ARDS. In TBI, even a mild arterial hypoxemia (for example, PaO2 = 55 to 58 mm Hg) can cause cerebral vasodilation and exacerbation of intracranial hypertension [5, 26]. The linear relation between PaCO2 and cerebral blood flow and volume [27] mandates control of PaCO2 as well.

Current and prior [16–19] results indicate that HFO-TGI substantially improves oxygenation versus CMV. Relative to both CMV and standard HFO, HFO-TGI augments lung base recruitment [16, 18]. The high-velocity TGI jet stream likely enhances HFO-dependent gas-transport mechanisms, such as the asymmetry in inspiratory velocity profiles, radial gas mixing, and molecular diffusion [16, 17]. TGI also augments dead-space clearance and HFO tidal volume and alveolar ventilation, thereby improving CO2 elimination [16, 18].

During our current HFO-TGI technique, we used a tracheal tube cuff leak, a high bias flow, and frequency and ΔP settings that correspond to an HFO tidal volume of 180 to 200 ml (Figure 1; Table 2[28]). The latter constitutes a 65% to 67% reduction of the pre-HFO-TGI CMV tidal volume and is consistent with improved lung protection [10]. A better lung protection during post-HFO-TGI CMV relative to pre-HFO-TGI CMV is also suggested by our favorable results on post-HFO-TGI respiratory mechanics (Table 2; [19]).

Assuming a stable chest-wall elastance (Ecw) during the daily time intervals of the study protocol (Figure 1), the observed increase in respiratory compliance (that is, decrease in respiratory elastance) should reflect a decrease in lung elastance (EL) due to HFO-TGI-associated recruitment [16–19]. Also, intrapleural pressure (Ppl) is given by the equation

Ppl = airway pressure × E CW / ( E L + E CW )

[29]

This means that for the same airway pressure level and Ecw, a decrease in EL is associated with an increase in Ppl. Furthermore, in the present study, the average ventilator-displayed HFO mPaw during HFO-TGI exceeded the preceding average CMV mPaw by about 11 cm H2O (Table 2). Consequently, Ppl was probably increased during HFO-TGI compared with CMV.

An increase in Ppl could impede systemic and jugular venous return, decrease cardiac output/index and mean arterial pressure, increase ICP, and decrease CPP [30]. In contrast, we observed an initial improvement in cerebral hemodynamics during HFO-TGI (Figure 2). Possible explanatory factors include (a) the mPaw decrease along the tracheal tube during HFO-TGI, which results in a mean tracheal pressure that is 5 to 6 cm H2O lower than the ventilator-displayed HFO mPaw [16, 19]; this means that the present study's actual, HFO-TGI-induced increase in average mean tracheal pressure was probably within 5 to 7 cm H2O [16]; and (b) an HFO-TGI-induced lung recruitment without concurrent hyperinflation [18]; this is consistent with our favorable results on oxygenation/shunt fraction, and PaCO2 (Figure 2 and Table 3).

A prior study of TBI/ARDS [31], showed that ICP and CPP remain stable when an increase in ventilation pressures (through PEEP increase from 0 to 10 cm H2O) augments lung recruitment, without affecting PaCO2.

Alternative, rescue ventilatory strategies for severe TBI/ARDS patients include prone positioning [5], high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) [5], CMV-TGI [32], pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) with a heparin-coated circuit [5, 33], and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [34]. Regarding the use of the first two strategies in TBI/ARDS, only scarce and inconclusive published data exist [5]. CMV-TGI may allow less-traumatic CMV settings while maintaining PaCO2 control [32]. CMV-TGI has the limitations of TGI [35], without the option of cuff leak use to lower expiratory airway resistance. pECLA and ECMO may result in better gas exchange and lung protection, with minimal concurrent risk of anticoagulation-induced side effects [5, 33, 34].

Methodologic considerations

While designing the study, we anticipated that in severe TBI patients, any new, ARDS-associated hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia could cause reversible ICP perturbations to values >20 mm Hg [5, 22]. Furthermore, we considered that an ICP level of 30 mm Hg constitutes an upper limit for its eventual and effective control to ≤20 mm Hg through increases in TIL [36]. Thus, we chose this particular upper ICP limit for both study enrolment and completion of our HFO-TGI intervention. Accordingly, regarding RMs, we chose an upper limit of ICP = 25 mm Hg, because we expected that any potential ICP increase associated with a 20-second RM would most likely be ≤5 mm Hg, thus resulting in a maximal ICP of ≤30 mm Hg during post-RM HFO-TGI [19]. This prediction is consistent with the results of a prior study, which also used ICP >25 mm Hg as the RM-abort criterion [35].

During pressure-controlled CMV, a 60-second RM with an incremental peak pressure of up to 60 cm H2O (pressure level sustained for 30 seconds) may decrease mean arterial pressure by about 15% and increase ICP by about ~23%, with concurrent reductions of about 17% in CPP [35]. We applied a continuous positive airway pressure of 40 to 45 cm H2O for just 20 seconds. In nine HFO-TGI sessions, the first RMs were associated with average decreases of about 35% and about 44% in mean arterial pressure and CPP (respectively) versus. pre-HFO-TGI CMV; furthermore, within 1 to 2 minutes after RM, the ICP increased by about 19% versus pre-HFO-TGI CMV (see Additional file 1, Figure S1). These protocol-related, secondary insults were promptly reversed by a temporary increase in vasopressor support and volume loading. Insults did not recur after subsequent RMs within the same HFO-TGI session, and occurred independent of session order (Additional file 1, Supplement to Results, and Figure S1). Volume-status optimization may have prevented transient hypotension after the second and third RM of the HFO-TGI sessions [37].

Study limitations

Limitations of long-term TGI include the impact of the high-velocity jet stream and/or an oscillating TGI catheter on the tracheal wall, causing mucosal necrosis and/or hemorrhage [16–19, 38, 39], the inspissation of secretions with the potential for partial or complete airway obstruction in case of inadequate humidification of TGI gas [16–19, 38, 40], and dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation, hemodynamic compromise, and pneumothorax caused by the forward-thrust TGI that can impede expiration [16–19, 38]. Other potential complications include venous gas embolism, interference of a TGI catheter passed through the tracheal tube with suctioning [38], TGI catheter obstruction by secretions [19], and absence of commercially available equipment specifically designed for TGI administration [16–19, 38]. In our clinical practice, we intermittently superimpose humidified TGI gas to HFO, and most frequently, for ≤12 hours [19]. Furthermore, during HFO-TGI, we use a tracheal tube cuff leak, to increase the effective width of the expiratory pathway, and thus reduce the risk of hyperinflation and promote CO2 elimination [8, 16–19].

In the present study, the use of brain-tissue O2 monitoring could have clarified the relation between the HFO-TGI-induced improvement in arterial oxygenation and the oxygenation of the brain tissue. It would have also have been of great interest to include transcranial Doppler ultrasonography measurements as part of the trial, to investigate the effect of HFO-TGI on cerebral blood flow. Finally, the study was noncontrolled and nonrandomized. However, it provides the first supporting data on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of HFO-TGI in severe TBI/ARDS.

Conclusions

HFO-TGI improves oxygenation and lung mechanics and does not adversely affect hemodynamics, CO2 elimination, ICP, and CPP when used to ventilate TBI patients with severe ARDS. RMs can cause hemodynamic complications and may have to be cancelled or aborted.

Key messages

  • The use of HFO in patients with TBI is limited because of hypercapnia that occurs commonly during HFO, even at relatively low HFO frequencies of about5 Hz. Hypercapnia can have deleterious effects on ICP and CPP.

  • The addition of TGI to HFO improves oxygenation and enhances CO2 elimination, thereby providing a theoretically suitable lung-protective strategy for patients with ARDS/TBI.

  • In this work, we showed that rescue sessions of HFO-TGI administered to TBI patients with severe ARDS result in improved gas exchange, higher post-HFO-TGI respiratory compliance, and less-traumatic CMV pressures, without adversely affecting ICP and/or CPP.

  • Our findings support the design of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the use of HFO-TGI in patients with ARDS and TBI.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

acute respiratory distress syndrome

CMV:

conventional mechanical ventilation

CPP:

cerebral perfusion pressure

ECMO:

extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Ecw:

chest wall elastance

EL:

lung elastance

FiO2:

fractional inspired O2

HFO:

high-frequency oscillation

HFPV:

high-frequency percussive ventilation

ICP:

intracranial pressure

mPaw:

mean airway pressure

pECLA:

pumpless extracorporeal lung assist

PEEP:

positive end-expiratory pressure

Ppl:

intrapleural pressure

RM:

recruitment maneuver

TBI:

traumatic brain injury

TGI:

tracheal gas insufflation

TIL:

therapy intensity level

ΔP:

oscillatory pressure amplitude.

References

  1. Bratton SL, Davis RL: Acute lung injury in isolated traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 1997, 41: 707--712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holland MC, Mackersie RC, Morabito D, Campbell AR, Kivett VA, Patel R, Erickson VR, Pittet JF: The development of acute lung injury is associated with worse neurologic outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2003, 55: 106--111. 10.1097/01.TA.0000071620.27375.BE.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1301-1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mascia L, Zavala E, Bosma K, Pasero D, Decaroli D, Andrews P, Isnardi D, Davi A, Arguis MJ, Berardino M, Ducati A, Brain IT group: High tidal volume is associated with the development of acute lung injury after severe brain injury: an international observational study. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35: 1815-1820. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275269.77467.DF.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Young N, Rhodes JK, Mascia L, Andrews PJ: Ventilatory strategies for patients with acute brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010, 16: 45-52. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833546fa.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury: I. Blood pressure and oxygenation. J Neurotrauma. 2007, 24 (Suppl 1): S7-S13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Imai Y, Slutsky AS: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation and ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2005, 33: S129-S134. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000156793.05936.81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Derdak S: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adult patients. Crit Care Med. 2003, 31 (Suppl): S317-S323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muellenbach RM, Kredel M, Said HM, Klosterhalfen B, Zollhoefer B, Wunder C, Redel A, Schmidt M, Roewer N, Brederlau J: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation reduces lung inflammation: a large-animal 24-h model of respiratory distress. Intensive Care Med. 2007, 33: 1423-1433. 10.1007/s00134-007-0708-x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson ND, Slutsky AS: Point: High-frequency ventilation is the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients. J Appl Physiol. 2008, 104: 1230-1231. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson ND, Chiche JD, Kacmarek RM, Hallett DC, Mehta S, Findlay GP, Granton JT, Slutsky AS, Stewart TE: Combining high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and recruitment in adults with early acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Treatment with Oscillation and an Open Lung Strategy (TOOLS) Trial pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2005, 33: 479-486. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000155785.23200.9E.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. David M, Karmrodt J, Weiler N, Scholz A, Markstaller K, Eberle B: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with traumatic brain injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005, 49: 209-214. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00570.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett SS, Graffagnino C, Borel CO, James ML: Use of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in neurocritical care patients. Neurocrit Care. 2007, 7: 221-226. 10.1007/s12028-007-0084-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Young NH, Andrews PJ: High-frequency oscillation as a rescue strategy for brain-injured adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Neurocrit Care. 2011, 15: 623-633. 10.1007/s12028-011-9550-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Derdak S, Stewart TE, Smith T, Rogers M, Bucman TG, Carlin B, Lowson S, Granton J: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a randomised, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002, 166: 801-808. 10.1164/rccm.2108052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mentzelopoulos SD, Malachias S, Kokkoris S, Roussos C, Zakynthinos SG: Comparison of high-frequency oscillation and tracheal gas insufflation versus standard high-frequency oscillation at two levels of tracheal pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2010, 36: 810-816. 10.1007/s00134-010-1822-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mentzelopoulos SD, Roussos C, Koutsoukou A, Sourlas S, Malachias S, Lachana A, Zakynthinos SG: Acute effects of combined high- frequency oscillation and tracheal gas insufflation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35: 1500-1508. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000265738.80832.BE.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mentzelopoulos SD, Theodoridou M, Malachias S, Sourlas S, Exarchos DN, Chondros D, Roussos C, Zakynthinos SG: Scanographic comparison of high frequency oscillation with versus without tracheal gas insufflation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37: 990-999. 10.1007/s00134-011-2162-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mentzelopoulos SD, Malachias S, Zintzaras E, Kokkoris S, Zakynthinos E, Makris D, Magira E, Markaki V, Roussos C, Zakynthinos SG: Intermittent recruitment with high-frequency oscillation/tracheal gas insufflation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2012, 39: 635-647. 10.1183/09031936.00158810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. The ARDS Definition Task Force: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012, 307: 2526-2533.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs Traumatic Brain Injury Task Force. [http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd9/Sep08TBI.pdf]

  22. Helmy A, Vizcaychipi M, Gupta AK: Traumatic brain injury: intensive care management. Br J Anaesth. 2007, 99: 32-42. 10.1093/bja/aem139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Therapy Intensity Level. [http://www.tbi-impact.org/cde/mod_templates/T_TIL.9.1.pdf]

  24. Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR: An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988, 138: 720-723. 10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.720.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum Clark M, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA: The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992, 9 (Suppl 1): S287-S292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta AK, Menon DK, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Jones JG: Thresholds for hypoxic cerebral vasodilation in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 1997, 85: 817-820.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grubb RL, Raichle ME, Eichling JO, Ter-Pogossian MM: The effects of changes in PaCO2 on cerebral blood volume, blood flow, and vascular mean transit time. Stroke. 1974, 5: 630-639. 10.1161/01.STR.5.5.630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hager DN, Fessler HE, Kaczka DW, Shanholtz CB, Fuld MK, Simon BA, Brower RG: Tidal volume delivery during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35: 1522-1529. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266586.04676.55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Valenza F: Bench-to-bedside review: chest wall elastance in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care. 2004, 8: 350-355. 10.1186/cc2854.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. McGuire G, Crossley D, Richards J, Wong D: Effects of varying levels of positive end expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Crit Care Med. 1997, 25: 1059-1062. 10.1097/00003246-199706000-00025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mascia L, Grasso S, Fiore T, Bruno F, Berardino M, Ducati A: Cerebro-pulmonary interactions during the application of low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2005, 31: 373-379. 10.1007/s00134-004-2491-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Martinez-Pérez M, Bernabé F, Peña R, Fernández R, Nahum A, Blanch L: Effects of expiratory tracheal gas insufflation in patients with severe head trauma and acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2004, 30: 2021-2027. 10.1007/s00134-004-2439-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bein T, Scherer MN, Philipp A, Weber F, Woertgen C: Pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and severe brain injury. J Trauma. 2005, 58: 1294-1297. 10.1097/01.TA.0000173275.06947.5C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Combes A, Bacchetta M, Brodie D, Müller T, Pellegrino V: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure in adults. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012, 18: 99-104. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834ef412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bein T, Kuhr LP, Bele S, Ploner F, Keyl C, Taeger K: Lung recruitment maneuver in patients with cerebral injury: effects on intracranial pressure and cerebral metabolism. Intensive Care Med. 2002, 28: 554-558. 10.1007/s00134-002-1273-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stocchetti N, Zanaboni C, Colombo A, Citerio G, Beretta L, Ghisoni L, Zanier ER, Canavesi K: Refractory intracranial hypertension and "second-tier" therapies in traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2008, 34: 461-467. 10.1007/s00134-007-0948-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Garamez MP, Arantes PR, Barros F, Souza CE, Victorino JA, Kacmarek RM, Barbas CS, Carvalho CR, Amato MB: Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 174: 268-278. 10.1164/rccm.200506-976OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nahum A: Tracheal gas insufflation. Crit Care. 1998, 2: 43-47. 10.1186/cc124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sznajder JI, Nahum A, Crawford G, Pollak ER, Schumarker PT, Wood LDH: Alveolar pressure inhomogeneity and gas exchange during constant-flow ventilation in dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1989, 67: 1489-1496.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Burton GG, Wagshul FA, Henderson D, Kime SW: Fatal airway obstruction caused by a mucous ball from a transtracheal catheter. Chest. 1991, 99: 1520-1521. 10.1378/chest.99.6.1520.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Stelios Kokkoris for his contribution in the collection of clinical data. This research was co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund, ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program "Education and Lifelong Learning" of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)-Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II, Investing in Knowledge Society through the European Social Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece

    Charikleia S Vrettou, Spyros G Zakynthinos, Sotirios Malachias & Spyros D Mentzelopoulos

Authors
  1. Charikleia S Vrettou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Spyros G Zakynthinos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sotirios Malachias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Spyros D Mentzelopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyros D Mentzelopoulos.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

CSV, SGZ, and SDM contributed to the conception and design of the study. SDM and SMa collected the data. CSV and SDM analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results. CSV and SMa drafted the manuscript, and SGZ and SDM critically revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Electronic supplementary material

13054_2013_2956_MOESM1_ESM.DOC

Additional file 1: Electronic Supplementary Material to High-Frequency Oscillation and tracheal gas insufflation in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and traumatic brain injury: An interventional physiological study. Details of methods and data not shown in the main manuscript. (DOC 794 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vrettou, C.S., Zakynthinos, S.G., Malachias, S. et al. High-frequency oscillation and tracheal gas insufflation in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and traumatic brain injury: an interventional physiological study. Crit Care 17, R136 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12815

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12815

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535