Skip to main content
Download PDF

Fluid balance and urine volume are independent predictors of mortality in acute kidney injury

Critical Care volume 17, Article number: R14 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

In ICUs, both fluid overload and oliguria are common complications associated with increased mortality among critically ill patients, particularly in acute kidney injury (AKI). Although fluid overload is an expected complication of oliguria, it remains unclear whether their effects on mortality are independent of each other. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of both fluid balance and urine volume on outcomes and determine whether they behave as independent predictors of mortality in adult ICU patients with AKI.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study in 10 Italian ICUs. AKI was defined by renal sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (creatinine >3.5 mg/dL or urine output (UO) <500 mL/d). Oliguria was defined as a UO <500 mL/d. Mean fluid balance (MFB) and mean urine volume (MUV) were calculated as the arithmetic mean of all daily values. Use of diuretics was noted daily. To assess the impact of MFB and MUV on mortality of AKI patients, multivariate analysis was performed by Cox regression.

Results

Of the 601 included patients, 132 had AKI during their ICU stay and the mortality in this group was 50%. Non-surviving AKI patients had higher MFB (1.31 ± 1.24 versus 0.17 ± 0.72 L/day; P <0.001) and lower MUV (1.28 ± 0.90 versus 2.35 ± 0.98 L/day; P <0.001) as compared to survivors. In the multivariate analysis, MFB (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.67 per L/day, 95%CI 1.33 to 2.09; <0.001) and MUV (adjusted HR 0.47 per L/day, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.67; <0.001) remained independent risk factors for 28-day mortality after adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, diuretic use, non-renal SOFA and sepsis. Diuretic use was associated with better survival in this population (adjusted HR 0.25, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.52; <0.001).

Conclusions

In this multicenter ICU study, a higher fluid balance and a lower urine volume were both important factors associated with 28-day mortality of AKI patients.

Introduction

Early and appropriate goal-directed fluid therapy is fundamental in acute resuscitation of critically ill patients [1, 2]; however, it is almost always associated with a certain degree of fluid overload (FO) [3, 4], which promotes tissue edema that could potentially contribute to progressive organ dysfunction [5, 6].

There is a growing amount of evidence supporting the relation between FO and unfavorable outcomes in critically ill patients. This has been demonstrated in general ICUs [7] and in specific clinical settings, such as acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) [8, 9], in patients undergoing abdominal surgery [10, 11], cardiac surgery [12] and in septic patients [13]. With regard to acute kidney injury (AKI) in particular, multiple pediatric studies have shown that a greater FO at the time of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is associated with higher mortality [14–16]. In a small study of 81 adult AKI patients who underwent RRT, a volume-related weight gain (VRWG) >10%, used as a surrogate for FO, was similarly associated with poor outcomes [17]. An association between FO and higher mortality has also been shown in critically ill patients with less severe forms of AKI [18–21]. In this context, FO has emerged as a potential 'biomarker' in critical illness, and it has been proposed that its prevention may be an important determinant of survival, particularly in AKI [3].

Oliguria is a common situation in the ICU and is considered an early and sensitive biomarker of renal injury because it may precede a creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI [22, 23]. Furthermore, in multicenter studies on critically ill patients with AKI, the presence of oliguria has been associated with higher mortality [20, 24–26]. Indeed, the evidence points out that both FO and oliguria are important predictors of mortality in critically ill patients. Fluid accumulation is a logical and expected complication of oliguric AKI due to impaired water and sodium excretion [20, 27]. It remains unclear whether their effects are independent of each other or if FO is merely in the causal pathway between oliguria and death. Interestingly, very few studies have adjusted for urine output in the analysis on FO and mortality. In 81 AKI patients requiring RRT, both oliguria and FO were independent predictors of mortality [17] and in a post hoc analysis of 306 AKI patients from the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT), FO was shown to be independently associated with mortality both in oliguric and non-oliguric patients [19]. In a large multicenter European study [20] on critically ill patients with AKI, a positive fluid balance was an important factor associated with increased 60-day mortality, but there was no adjustment for urine volume or oliguria.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of both fluid balance and urine volume on outcomes and determine whether they behave as independent predictors of mortality in adult ICU patients with AKI.

Materials and methods

Study design and data collection

We performed a secondary analysis of data from 601 patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter ICU cohort study of adult patients (age ≥18 years) admitted to 10 ICUs from September 2009 to April 2010 (NEFROlogia e Cura INTensiva (NEFROINT) Study), designed to describe the epidemiology of AKI in Italian ICUs [28]. Detailed methods of data collection have been previously described [29]. Collected data included demographics, anthropometrics, admission diagnosis, comorbidities, daily vital signs and laboratory data to calculate automatically the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) [30], the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) [31] and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [32] scores. RRT details and mortality were also reported. Furthermore, 24-hour urine output, worst 6-hour and worst 12-hour urine output, fluid balance and use of diuretics were recorded daily. Furosemide was the only diuretic used in all the centers. Fluid balance was calculated daily as the difference between fluid intake and fluid output. Fluid output included all body fluids, including urine and, if applicable, dialysis ultrafiltrate. This study was approved by the ethics committee of St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. Because of the anonymous and non-interventional nature of the study, the ethics committees of the participating study centers (see list below) waived the need for informed consent.

Definitions

AKI was defined according to the renal SOFA score as a creatinine >3.5 mg/dL or a urine output <500 mL/day, as used by the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) study investigators [20]. Patients who received RRT were assigned a renal SOFA score of 4, regardless of the serum creatinine or urine output. AKI was considered 'early' if it occurred in the first two days of ICU admission and 'late' if it occurred more than two days after ICU admission [20]. Oliguria was defined as a urine output of less than 500 mL/day. Mean fluid balance (MFB) and mean urine volume (MUV) were calculated as the arithmetic mean of the daily values during the patient's ICU stay. The SOFA score was expressed in two ways: total score and the score without the renal component (non-renal SOFA). For sensitivity analysis, we also defined AKI using the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) consensus [33].

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as both mean ± SD and as median (IQR) and compared between any two groups (for example, AKI versus non-AKI, survivors versus non-survivors, early versus late AKI and so on), using the t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Normality of distribution was evaluated by visual inspection of histograms and by the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Categorical variables are expressed as number of cases and proportion and compared with the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test or the Fisher exact test.

To evaluate the influence of MFB and MUV on the survival time of AKI patients, exploratory univariate analysis for several variables was first performed to identify possible confounders associated with 28-day mortality. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was then performed using a forward stepwise selection method, criteria for entry 0.05 and for removal 0.10. The assumption of proportional hazards was checked graphically using log(-log(survival probability)) plots and was found appropriate. Variables considered for multivariable analysis were age, gender, co-morbid disease, sepsis, non-renal SOFA, and MFB, as were used in a previous study [20], with the addition of MUV and diuretic use. Age, sepsis and diuretic use were all significant on univariate analysis. APACHE II, SAPS II, and total and non-renal SOFA scores were also significant on univariate analysis, but the strongest association with mortality was seen with non-renal SOFA, and this was used in all multivariable models. We tested for collinearity among all variables. From the Cox model, hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs were generated. We also performed a number of sensitivity analyses. First, since MFB and MUV were found to be collinear, we repeated the analysis using an interaction term MFB*MUV. Second, we also expressed urine output as the presence of oliguria anytime during the ICU stay and the duration of oliguria (defined as the proportion of ICU days complicated by oliguria) as an alternate representation of urine volume in the models. Third, diuretic use was also expressed as duration of diuretic use (defined by the proportion of ICU days in which diuretics were used). The 28-day survival by timing of AKI, oliguria and diuretic use were additionally evaluated graphically using the Kaplan-Meier product limit survival plot. All statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) software package, with a two-sided P value <0.05 considered as statistically significant.

Results

Study population

Of the 601 patients enrolled in the NEFROINT study [28], 25 were excluded because of the presence of end-stage renal disease on chronic RRT and three other patients were excluded because of incomplete data on fluid balance and urine output, leaving 573 patients for analysis. Characteristics of the entire cohort are shown in Additional file 1, Table S1. The mean age was 63.0 ± 17.3 years and 59.5% were men. All-cause 28-day mortality was 21.8% and mean ICU length of stay was 10.1 ± 12.0 days. Of these patients, 132 (23%) developed AKI.

Acute kidney injury

AKI patients were older, more likely to be diabetic and to have sepsis or a cardiovascular diagnosis at ICU admission and higher illness severity scores than non-AKI [see Additional file 1, Table S1]. MFB was higher (0.7 ± 1.2 versus 0.5 ± 1.1 L/day; P = 0.008) and MUV was lower (1.8 ± 1.1 versus 2.6 ± 1.3 L/day; P <0.001) in the AKI group. Diuretics were used more commonly on AKI patients and for a larger proportion of ICU days (Table 1). Mortality was higher among AKI patients (50% versus 13.4%; P <0.001) and ICU stay was longer.

Table 1 Fluid balance, urine volume and diuretic use by presence or absence of AKI.
Full size table

AKI patient characteristics according to outcome are shown in Table 2. Non-surviving AKI patients were older, had higher illness severity scores and were more likely to be septic. The MFB was higher (1.3 ± 1.2 versus 0.2 ± 0.7 L/day; P <0.001) and the MUV was lower (1.3 ± 0.9 versus 2.3 ± 1.0 L/day; P <0.001) among non-survivors. Oliguria was also more common in non-survivors (83.3% versus 54.5%; P = 0.001) and persisted for a larger proportion of the ICU stay (35.5 ± 34.5% versus 13.6 ± 21.9%; P <0.001).

Table 2 AKI patient characteristics by outcome.
Full size table

Early AKI was present in 83 patients (62.9% of the AKI group) and was associated with higher illness severity scores, lower MUV (1.6 ± 1.1 versus 2.2 ± 0.9 L/day; P <0.001), a larger proportion of days of oliguria (32.3% versus 11.5%, P <0.001) and fewer RRT-free days, but a shorter ICU stay than late AKI [see Additional file 1, Table S2]. The MFB, the proportion of days with diuretics and the mortality were not different between the groups.

As expected, oliguric patients had a higher MFB (0.9 ± 1.3 versus 0.4 ± 1.0 L/day; P <0.001), tended to receive diuretics more often (73.6% versus 62.7%; P = 0.06), had higher mortality (60.4% versus 14.4%; P <0.001) and longer ICU stay (15.5 ± 15.8 versus 9.3 ± 10.9; P <0.001) than non-oliguric patients.

Mean fluid balance, mean urine volume and mortality

In general, non-survivor AKI patients had significantly higher MFB compared to survivors (Figure 1). When analyzing the subgroups separately by AKI timing, the presence of oliguria and the use of diuretics, the same results were observed. The MUV was significantly lower among non-survivors overall, and in most of the subgroups, except in non-oliguric patients. Figure 2 demonstrates the pattern of cumulative fluid balance among survivors and non-survivors in the first seven days in the ICU. Non-survivors consistently had higher mean cumulative fluid balance throughout the ICU stay and the magnitude of the difference between the groups increased with each additional day.

Figure 1
figure 1

Mean fluid balance (A) and mean urine volume (B) in survivors and non-survivors. *P <0.05; **P <0.001. AKI, acute kidney injury.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Cumulative fluid balance in survivors and non-survivors in the first seven days of ICU stay (mean ± SEM). *P =0.015; **P <0.01. SEM, standard error of the mean.

Full size image

The 28-day survival was significantly better among non-oliguric patients (Figure 3; P <0.044) and in patients treated with diuretics (Figure 4; P = 0.001). The 28-day survival was similar between early and late AKI (not shown, P = 0.16 on log rank test).

Figure 3
figure 3

Survival curve for 28-day mortality by the presence or absence of oliguria in the ICU.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4

Survival curve for 28-day mortality by the use or non-use of diuretics in the ICU.

Full size image

On multivariate Cox regression analysis (Table 3), both MFB and MUV were independent predictors of 28-day mortality (MFB, adjusted HR 1.67, 95%CI 1.33 to 2.09 per L/day; P <0.001 and MUV, adjusted HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.67 per L/day; P <0.001, Model 1). Interestingly, the use of diuretics appeared to be associated with a lower risk of death in both unadjusted and adjusted analysis (adjusted HR 0.25, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.52; P <0.001). Collinearity was observed between MFB and MUV, and we performed a second model including the interaction between the two (MFB*MUV). In this model, the interaction term was significant; the effect of MFB was somewhat attenuated, while the effect of MUV was accentuated. Of interest, higher non-renal SOFA scores were significantly associated with increased mortality on univariate analysis (HR 1.18, 95CI% 1.10 to 1.27; P <0.001), but this was no longer significant on multivariable analysis (HR 1.04, 95CI% 0.96 to 1.14; P = 0.35).

Table 3 Cox regression analysis for 28-day mortality.
Full size table

In terms of sensitivity analyses [see Additional file 1, Table S3], qualitatively similar results were seen when MUV was alternatively expressed as presence of oliguria (adjusted HR 1.86, 95%CI 1.50 to 2.32 for MFB, and adjusted HR 1.35, 95%CI 0.67 to 2.71 for oliguria) or duration of oliguria (adjusted HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.37 to 2.15 for MFB, and adjusted HR 1.01, 95%CI 1.003 to 1.02 for %ICU days with oliguria), and when diuretic usage was expressed as duration of diuretics (adjusted HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.38 to 2.18 for MFB and adjusted HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.98 to 0.99 for %ICU days on diuretics). Furthermore, results were also similar when AKI was defined using RIFLE criteria (n = 378 AKI patients; crude mortality 28.8%). The adjusted HR for MFB was 1.51, 95%CI 1.31 to 1.74 L/day; P <0.001 and for MUV was 0.48, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.62 L/day; P <0.001 in this sensitivity analysis (Table 4).

Table 4 Sensitivity analysis considering presence of AKI according to RIFLE classification.
Full size table

Discussion

Using data from a multicenter ICU cohort [28], we examined the influence of fluid balance and urine volume on outcomes among critically ill patients with AKI. The key findings of this study are: first, AKI patients had higher MFB, lower MUV, and a higher mortality than non-AKI patients; second, MFB was significantly higher in non-survivors in all AKI patients, and consistently higher across various subgroups (early and late AKI, oliguric and non-oliguric, use and non-use of diuretics, Figure 1); third, MUV was lower in non-survivors in all subgroups, except non-oliguric patients; finally, both MFB and MUV were significantly associated with increased 28-day mortality in AKI patients, and their interaction was significant as well.

Our results are consistent with prior studies on critically ill patients, both without and with AKI. In non-AKI studies, a positive fluid balance was strongly associated with increased mortality and other unfavorable outcomes in some subgroups of ICU patients, including worse lung function, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, increased post-operative complications and longer ICU stay [7–13]. Among adult AKI patients in particular, Van Biesen et al. [21] showed that additional fluid loading not only failed to improve renal function, but was also associated with worsening of respiratory function. The Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease (PICARD) group [18] concluded that fluid weight gain >10% in AKI patients was associated with higher mortality and that the increase in mortality rate was proportional to the degree of fluid accumulation. In a study with 1,120 ICU patients with AKI, the authors showed that the MFB was an independent predictor of mortality on multivariate analysis (adjusted HR 1.21, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.28; P <0.001) [20]. However, these three studies did not adjust for urine volume in their models.

An important finding in the present study is that fluid balance and urine volume were both strong and significant predictors of mortality, even accounting for their interaction. We reproduced the analysis performed in AKI patients from a multicenter European ICU cohort [20] and extended it by adding the variable urine volume to the analysis. Our findings confirmed the association of both FO (adjusted HR per L/day of MFB 1.67, 95%CI 1.33 to 2.09; P <0.001) and reduced urine volume (adjusted HR per L/day of MUV 0.47, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.67; P <0.001) with adverse outcomes. Qualitatively similar findings were obtained even when the urine volume was expressed as the presence of oliguria or duration of oliguria, implying that FO is not merely an intermediate in the pathway between lower urine output and mortality. This relation is not well-explored in the literature. To our knowledge, only two adult AKI studies have adjusted for urine output in their analysis of FO and outcomes. In a cohort of 81 adult critically ill patients with severe AKI requiring RRT, the authors examined the effect of oliguria, VRWG used as a measure of FO, sepsis and APACHE II score in the multivariate model [17]. Both oliguria and VRWG ≥10% were predictors of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.04, 95%CI 1.10 to 8.36 and adjusted OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.05 to 6.99, respectively). In the aforementioned FACTT study, the association between fluid balance and mortality was significant in patients both with oliguria (HR per L/day of MFB 1.77, 95%CI 1.27 to 2.45) and without oliguria (HR per L/day of MFB 1.61, 95%CI 1.27 to 2.45) during the initial seven days after randomization [19]. Our findings are consistent with these studies. Furthermore, we observed that the interaction between fluid balance and urine volume was statistically significant, and still MFB and MUV individually remained predictors of 28-day mortality.

The association between oliguria and worse outcomes in AKI patients is well recognized [4, 22]. In our study, the survival of non-oliguric patients was significantly better when compared to oliguric patients (Figure 3), but in both groups non-survivors had significantly higher MFB (Figure 1). Similarly to other authors [20, 25], we did not find significant differences in mortality between patients who developed early or late AKI (not shown, P = 0.16 on log rank test) but again, non-survivors in both groups presented significantly higher MFB and lower MUV.

An interesting finding in the present study is that the use of diuretics was inversely associated with mortality, and this effect persisted after adjustment for MFB and MUV (adjusted HR 0.25, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.52), suggesting that the diuretic in itself may exert a protective effect. This differs from the FACTT study, in which post-AKI furosemide use had a protective effect on 60-day mortality on univariate analysis, but not when adjusted for fluid balance [19]. The role of diuretics in AKI remains controversial. While three meta-analyses [34–36] have demonstrated a lack of association between diuretics and mortality, only two of the included studies enrolled ICU patients. Two observational studies in ICU settings showed conflicting results. The PICARD Study Group concluded that diuretic use increased the risk of death or non-recovery of renal function (OR 1.77, 95%CI 1.14 to 2.76) [37]. In contrast, the Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney) investigators did not find a significant association between diuretic use and mortality (adjusted OR 1.21, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.5) [38]. Loop diuretics have effects that could be potentially beneficial in preventing or minimizing the severity of AKI. They reduce the oxygen demand and prevent hypoxic damage, and furosemide has been shown to improve renal hemodynamics, attenuate ischemic-related renal angiogenesis and reduce ischemic-induced apoptosis in animal models [39–41]. A pilot phase II randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing furosemide to placebo in ICU patients with early AKI is in progress [42]; this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of furosemide versus placebo on the progression of AKI severity and fluid balance. The results of this trial will help us to understand better the role of diuretics in AKI in the critical care setting.

Our study has important strengths including its multicenter design that contributes to reduce practice bias. The depth of data collection permitted the exploration of the effects of duration of oliguria and diuretic use, which confirmed the results of the main analysis. Our study also extends this continuous association of fluid balance, decreased urine volume and death to critically ill adults meeting the consensus definition for AKI (RIFLE). However, we recognize some limitations. Because of the observational nature of the study, we cannot establish a causal relationship between MFB, MUV and mortality. The modest sample size precluded extensive subgroup analysis and may have resulted in underestimation of the impact of known risk factors, such as SOFA score, on multivariable analysis. We did not collect data on actual diuretic dose, but the proportion of ICU days in which diuretics were used can be considered a reasonable surrogate. It is possible that the type of fluid (that is, colloid versus crystalloid, parenteral versus enteral), aside from the volume, influences outcomes. Unfortunately, this information was not available in our own study or in previous investigations on FO [9, 13]. We believe this is an important issue that needs to be clarified with future studies. Nevertheless, our findings are consistent across the multiple sensitivity analyses performed and the association between fluid balance, urine volume and mortality appears robust.

Conclusions

In summary, both fluid balance and urine volume were found to be independent predictors of mortality in adult critically ill patients with AKI. Of interest, diuretic use appeared to be independently associated with better survival in this study. The results of an ongoing phase II randomized controlled trial on diuretics in early AKI will help clarify this issue.

Key messages

  • In this multicenter observational study in ICU patients with AKI, non-survivors presented higher MFB (1.3 ± 1.2 versus 0.2 ± 0.7 L/day; P <0.001) and lower MUV (1.3 ± 0.9 versus 2.3 ± 1.0 L/day). Both higher fluid balance and a lower urine volume were shown to be independent predictors of 28-day mortality in this AKI population.

  • The use of diuretics was associated with better survival.

Participating centers

St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza; University of Bari, Bari; Federico II University Hospital, Naples; University of Pisa, Pisa; University Hospital Umberto I - G.M. Lancisi - G. Salesi, Torrette, Ancona; Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Naples; University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan; A.O.U.I. University of Verona, Verona; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome

Abbreviations

AKI:

acute kidney injury

ALI:

acute lung injury

APACHE II:

acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II

ARDS:

acute respiratory distress syndrome

BEST Kidney:

Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney

FACTT:

Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trail

FO:

fluid overload

HR:

hazard ratio

MFB:

mean fluid balance

MUV:

mean urine volume

NEFROINT:

NEFROlogia e Cura INTensiva

OR:

odds ratio

PICARD:

Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease

RIFLE:

Risk of renal dysfunction, Injury to the kidney, Failure of kidney function, Loss of kidney function and End-stage kidney disease

RRT:

renal replacement therapy

SAPS II:

Simplified Acute Physiology Score II

SOAP:

Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

UO:

urine output

VRWG:

volume-related weight gain.

References

  1. Lin SM, Huang CD, Lin HC, Liu CY, Wang CH, Kuo HP: A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Shock 2006, 26: 551-557. 10.1097/01.shk.0000232271.09440.8f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001, 345: 1368-1377. 10.1056/NEJMoa010307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagshaw SM, Brophy PD, Cruz D, Ronco C: Fluid balance as a biomarker: impact of fluid overload on outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2008, 12: 169. 10.1186/cc6948

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Kellum JA: Oliguria, volume overload, and loop diuretics. Crit Care Med 2008, 36: S172-178. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318168c92f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta RL, Bouchard J: Controversies in acute kidney injury: effects of fluid overload on outcome. Contrib Nephrol 2011, 174: 200-211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prowle JR, Echeverri JE, Ligabo EV, Ronco C, Bellomo R: Fluid balance and acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010, 6: 107-115. 10.1038/nrneph.2009.213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Sugihara M, French C, Stephens D, Wendon J, Honore P, Mulder J, Turner A: Pulmonary artery catheter versus pulse contour analysis: a prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care 2006, 10: R174. 10.1186/cc5126

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Reinhart K, Groeneveld J, Michalopoulos A, Sprung CL, Artigas A, Ranieri VM: High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. Chest 2005, 128: 3098-3108. 10.1378/chest.128.5.3098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL: Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006, 354: 2564-2575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F, Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy: Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003, 238: 641-648. 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I: Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005, 103: 25-32. 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein A, de Souza LV, Belettini CR, Menegazzo WR, Viegas JR, Costa Pereira EM, Eick R, Araujo L, Consolim-Colombo F, Irigoyen MC: Fluid overload and changes in serum creatinine after cardiac surgery: predictors of mortality and longer intensive care stay. A prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2012, 16: R99. 10.1186/cc11368

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall JR, Payen D: Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 344-353. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000194725.48928.3A

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein SL, Somers MJ, Baum MA, Symons JM, Brophy PD, Blowey D, Bunchman TE, Baker C, Mottes T, McAfee N, Barnett J, Morrison G, Rogers K, Fortenberry JD: Pediatric patients with multi-organ dysfunction syndrome receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int 2005, 67: 653-658. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.67121.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gillespie RS, Seidel K, Symons JM: Effect of fluid overload and dose of replacement fluid on survival in hemofiltration. Pediatr Nephrol 2004, 19: 1394-1399. 10.1007/s00467-004-1655-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foland JA, Fortenberry JD, Warshaw BL, Pettignano R, Merritt RK, Heard ML, Rogers K, Reid C, Tanner AJ, Easley KA: Fluid overload before continuous hemofiltration and survival in critically ill children: a retrospective analysis. Crit Care Med 2004, 32: 1771-1776. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000132897.52737.49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fulop T, Pathak MB, Schmidt DW, Lengvarszky Z, Juncos JP, Lebrun CJ, Brar H, Juncos LA: Volume-related weight gain and subsequent mortality in acute renal failure patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy. ASAIO J 2010, 56: 333-337.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Chertow GM, Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA, Paganini EP, Mehta RL: Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2009, 76: 422-427. 10.1038/ki.2009.159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grams ME, Estrella MM, Coresh J, Brower RG, Liu KD: Fluid balance, diuretic use, and mortality in acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, 6: 966-973. 10.2215/CJN.08781010

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Payen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, Spies C, Reinhart K, Vincent JL: A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care 2008, 12: R74. 10.1186/cc6916

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Biesen W, Yegenaga I, Vanholder R, Verbeke F, Hoste E, Colardyn F, Lameire N: Relationship between fluid status and its management on acute renal failure (ARF) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis: a prospective analysis. J Nephrol 2005, 18: 54-60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Macedo E, Malhotra R, Bouchard J, Wynn SK, Mehta RL: Oliguria is an early predictor of higher mortality in critically ill patients. Kidney Int 2011, 80: 760-767. 10.1038/ki.2011.150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prowle JR, Liu YL, Licari E, Bagshaw SM, Egi M, Haase M, Haase-Fielitz A, Kellum JA, Cruz D, Ronco C, Tsutsui K, Uchino S, Bellomo R: Oliguria as predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2011, 15: R172. 10.1186/cc10318

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brivet FG, Kleinknecht DJ, Loirat P, Landais PJ: Acute renal failure in intensive care units--causes, outcome, and prognostic factors of hospital mortality; a prospective, multicenter study. French Study Group on Acute Renal Failure. Crit Care Med 1996, 24: 192-198. 10.1097/00003246-199602000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guerin C, Girard R, Selli JM, Perdrix JP, Ayzac L: Initial versus delayed acute renal failure in the intensive care unit. A multicenter prospective epidemiological study. Rhone-Alpes Area Study Group on Acute Renal Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 161: 872-879. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9809066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liano F, Junco E, Pascual J, Madero R, Verde E: The spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit compared with that seen in other settings. The Madrid Acute Renal Failure Study Group. Kidney Int Suppl 1998, 66: S16-24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rimmele T, Kellum JA: Oliguria and fluid overload. Contrib Nephrol 2010, 164: 39-45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Piccinni P, Cruz DN, Gramaticopolo S, Garzotto F, Dal Santo M, Aneloni G, Rocco M, Alessandri E, Giunta F, Michetti V, Iannuzzi M, Belluomo Anello C, Brienza N, Carlini M, Pelaia P, Gabbanelli V, Ronco C, NEFROINT Investigators: Prospective multicenter study on epidemiology of acute kidney injury in the ICU: a critical care nephrology Italian collaborative effort (NEFROINT). Minerva Anestesiol 2011, 77: 1072-1083.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Garzotto F, Piccinni P, Cruz D, Gramaticopolo S, Dal Santo M, Aneloni G, Kim JC, Rocco M, Alessandri E, Giunta F, Michetti V, Iannuzzi M, Belluomo Anello C, Brienza N, Carlini M, Pelaia P, Gabbanelli V, Ronco C, NEFROINT investigation group: RIFLE-based data collection/management system applied to a prospective cohort multicenter Italian study on the epidemiology of acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Blood Purif 2011, 31: 159-171. 10.1159/000322161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985, 13: 818-829. 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993, 270: 2957-2963. 10.1001/jama.1993.03510240069035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S: Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 1998, 26: 1793-1800. 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P: Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 2004, 8: R204-212. 10.1186/cc2872

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bagshaw SM, Delaney A, Haase M, Ghali WA, Bellomo R: Loop diuretics in the management of acute renal failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Resusc 2007, 9: 60-68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ho KM, Sheridan DJ: Meta-analysis of frusemide to prevent or treat acute renal failure. BMJ 2006, 333: 420. 10.1136/bmj.38902.605347.7C

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zacharias M, Conlon NP, Herbison GP, Sivalingam P, Walker RJ, Hovhannisyan K: Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, (4):CD003590.

  37. Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Soroko S, Chertow GM: Diuretics, mortality, and nonrecovery of renal function in acute renal failure. JAMA 2002, 288: 2547-2553. 10.1001/jama.288.20.2547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Uchino S, Doig GS, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Nacedo E, Gibney N, Tolwani A, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (B.E.S.T. Kidney) Investigators: Diuretics and mortality in acute renal failure. Crit Care Med 2004, 32: 1669-1677. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000132892.51063.2F

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Aravindan N, Aravindan S, Riedel BJ, Weng HR, Shaw AD: Furosemide prevents apoptosis and associated gene expression in a rat model of surgical ischemic acute renal failure. Ren Fail 2007, 29: 399-407. 10.1080/08860220701263671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Aravindan N, Shaw A: Effect of furosemide infusion on renal hemodynamics and angiogenesis gene expression in acute renal ischemia/reperfusion. Ren Fail 2006, 28: 25-35. 10.1080/08860220500461229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Heyman SN, Rosen S, Epstein FH, Spokes K, Brezis ML: Loop diuretics reduce hypoxic damage to proximal tubules of the isolated perfused rat kidney. Kidney Int 1994, 45: 981-985. 10.1038/ki.1994.132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bagshaw SM, Gibney RT, McAlister FA, Bellomo R: The SPARK Study: a phase II randomized blinded controlled trial of the effect of furosemide in critically ill patients with early acute kidney injury. Trials 2010, 11: 50. 10.1186/1745-6215-11-50

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs Elisa Alessandri, Francesco Giunta, Massimo Antonelli, Marzia Dal Santo, Vincenzo Gabbanelli and Engs. Matteo Recchia and Giovanni Aneloni for their invaluable assistance with the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Renal Research Institute Vicenza (IRRIV), Viale Rodolfi 37, Vicenza, 36100, Italy

    Catarina Teixeira, Francesco Garzotto, Claudio Ronco & Dinna N Cruz

  2. Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, St. Bortolo Hospital, Viale Rodolfi 37, Vicenza, 36100, Italy

    Francesco Garzotto, Claudio Ronco & Dinna N Cruz

  3. Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, St. Bortolo Hospital, Viale Rodolfi 37, Vicenza, 36100, Italy

    Pasquale Piccinni & Silvia Gramaticopolo

  4. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency and Organ Transplantation - University of Bari, Pizza G. Cesare 11, Bari, 70124, Italy

    Nicola Brienza

  5. Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, Federico II University Hospital, Via S. Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy

    Michele Iannuzzi

  6. Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 6, Pisa, 56100, Italy

    Francesco Forfori

  7. Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Umberto I - G.M. Lancisi - G. Salesi, Via Tronto 10/A, Torrette di Ancona, 60020, Italy

    Paolo Pelaia

  8. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico 155, Rome, 00161, Italy

    Monica Rocco

  9. Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department of Anesthesiological and Surgical Science 2 (SUN), University Hospital, Via Santa Maria di Costantinopoli 104, Naples, 80138, Italy

    Clara Belluomo Anello

  10. Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, 20132, Italy

    Tiziana Bove

  11. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, A.O.U.I. University of Verona, Piazzale Scuro, Verona, 37134, Italy

    Mauro Carlini

  12. Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy

    Vincenzo Michetti

Authors
  1. Catarina Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Garzotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pasquale Piccinni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicola Brienza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michele Iannuzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Silvia Gramaticopolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Francesco Forfori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paolo Pelaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Monica Rocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Claudio Ronco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Clara Belluomo Anello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tiziana Bove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mauro Carlini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Vincenzo Michetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Dinna N Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

NEFROlogia e Cura INTensiva (NEFROINT) investigators

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinna N Cruz.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The authors contributed as follows: Study conception and design - CT, FG, PP, DNC; patient enrollment and acquisition of data - NB, MI, SG, FF, MR, CBA, TB, MC, VM, PPelaia, DNC; data analysis and interpretation of the results - CT, NB, MI, DNC; Drafting of the manuscript - CT, DNC; critical revision of the manuscript - CT, FG, PP, NB, MI, SG, FF, MR, DNC; obtaining funding for the project - PP, CR. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

13054_2012_1657_MOESM1_ESM.DOC

Additional file 1: Table S1. Patient characteristics by presence or absence of AKI. Table S2: Patient characteristics by early or late AKI. Table S3: Sensitivity analysis using surrogates for mean urine volume and diuretic use. Variables considered for the final model included age, gender, co-morbid diseases, non-renal SOFA, sepsis, mean fluid balance, mean urine volume and diuretic use. For sensitivity analysis mean urine volume was replaced by either presence of oliguria or proportion of ICU days with oliguria as surrogates for mean urine volume; and diuretic use was substituted by proportion of ICU days receiving diuretics. AKI, acute kidney injury; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment. (DOC 78 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teixeira, C., Garzotto, F., Piccinni, P. et al. Fluid balance and urine volume are independent predictors of mortality in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 17, R14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12484

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535