Skip to main content
Download PDF

Targeting circulating high mobility group box-1 and histones by extracorporeal blood purification as an immunomodulation strategy against critical illnesses

Critical Care volume 27, Article number: 77 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Both high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) and histones are major damage-associated molecular patterns (DAPMs) that mediate lethal systemic inflammation, activation of the complement and coagulation system, endothelial injury and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critical illnesses. Although accumulating evidence collectively shows that targeting HMGB1 or histones by their specific antibodies or inhibitors could significantly mitigate aberrant immune responses in multiple critically ill animal models, routine clinical use of such agents is still not recommended by any guideline. In contrast, extracorporeal blood purification, which has been widely used to replace dysfunctional organs and remove exogenous or endogenous toxins in intensive care units, may also exert an immunomodulatory effect by eliminating inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, endotoxin, HMGB1 and histones in patients with critical illnesses. In this review, we summarize the multiple immunopathological roles of HMGB1 and histones in mediating inflammation, immune thrombosis and organ dysfunction and discuss the rationale for the removal of these DAMPs using various hemofilters. The latest preclinical and clinical evidence for the use of extracorporeal blood purification to improve the clinical outcome of critically ill patients by targeting circulating HMGB1 and histones is also gathered.

Introduction

Critical illnesses are commonly associated with immune dysregulation, characterized by concurrent hyperinflammation and immune suppression [1]. It has been well established that endotoxins are major inflammatory mediators that trigger the release of both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and organ injury in critically ill patients, especially those with sepsis, during the past two decades [2,3,4]. Accordingly, endotoxins and cytokines are widely recognized as the main therapeutic targets during extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) sessions for the immunomodulation of critical illnesses [4, 5]. Currently, EBP uses a series of hemofilters to remove hydrophilic or hydrophobic solutes through the mechanism of convection, diffusion or adsorption, and the solute removal spectrum of a hemofilter is significantly dependent on its own membrane/adsorbent structure and treatment dose [6]. Multiple hemofilters, such as Toraymyxin hemofilter (Toray Industries, Tokyo, Japan), the CytoSorb hemofilter (CytoSorbents Corporation, New Jersey, USA) and the oXiris hemofilter (Baxter, Meyzieu, France), have been used to treat critically ill patients in current clinical practice aiming to eliminate endotoxins and/or cytokines despite the lack of solid evidence of survival benefit [3, 7]. The failure of EBP therapies to improve survival in these patients could be attributed to the inadequate timing for treatment initiation, inadequate patient selection, inadequate therapeutic target selection and insufficient clearance of inflammatory mediators [3, 5]. Instead of the removal of cytokines that are downstream mediators in the immune cascade, the elimination of upstream proinflammatory mediators, such as the pathogen, activated host immune cells and especially damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), could be more suitable therapeutic targets for EBP therapies in the early phase of critical illnesses.

Recent reviews have demonstrated the multiple roles of DAMPs, which are produced or released by damaged and dying cells, in sterile inflammation and tissue repair after they are sensed by various pattern recognition receptors [8, 9]. Currently, an increasing number of endogenous host-derived molecules, including S100 proteins, heat shock proteins, high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), circulating histones and glycans such as heparan sulfate, are considered DAMPs [10]. Among them, HMGB1 and histones are abundantly studied because they significantly mediate lethal systemic inflammation, complement and coagulation activation, endothelial injury and organ dysfunction in various critical illnesses, such as sepsis [11, 12], acute liver failure [13], pancreatitis [14, 15], multiple trauma [16] and severe COVID-19 [17, 18]. Accumulating evidence collectively suggests that high levels of serum HMGB1 and histones significantly correlate with disease severity and mortality in critically ill patients [16, 19,20,21,22,23]. Accordingly, targeting HMGB1 and histones to alleviate inflammation and tissue injury might be an important immunomodulation strategy against these critical diseases. To be gratified, the last decade has witnessed the rapid development of diverse histone-neutralizing agents and HMGB1 antagonists to alleviate the immunopathological processes induced by such DAMPs and thus to improve the outcome of sepsis [12, 24], liver failure [25, 26] and pancreatitis [27, 28] animal models. For instance, heparin, the most commonly used histone-neutralizing agent, not only prevents histone-mediated coagulation activation and organ injury in mice [29, 30] but also significantly alleviates the HMGB1-induced inflammatory response [31] and lung endothelial dysfunction through the P38-GSK3β-snail signaling pathway [32]. However, routine use of heparin in critically ill patients is not always available because the inherent anticoagulant activity of heparin unfortunately increases the risk of fatal bleeding in those with coagulopathy. None of the currently available anti-histone or anti-HMGB1 agents have been approved for immunomodulation in the management of critical illnesses by any clinical guideline due to the lack of evidence. Most recently, EBP using multiple hemofilters, such as Cytosorb [33], AN69ST membrane [34] and heparin-functionalized Seraph-100 blood filter [35], was found to adsorb circulating HMGB1 and histones in vitro and in vivo. It is noteworthy that the use of such EBP devices in patients with critical illness has great potential to mitigate HMGB1/histone-mediated inflammation, immune thrombosis and organ injury without the administration of traditional anti-histone or anti-HMGB1 agents.

In this review, we aim to clarify the immunopathological roles of HMGB1 and histones in critical illness, discuss the rationale for the removal of DAMPs using different hemofilters and summarize the latest preclinical and clinical evidence in this field. We also provide perspectives for the future design and clinical evaluation of novel hemofilters for the removal of DAMPs in the blood of critically ill patients. Of note, our review exclusively discusses the effect of EBP with various hemofilters on the removal of DAMPs, and we unfortunately fail to further demonstrate the immunomodulatory effect of such hemofilters on immune cell functions, a major component of the immune response, due to a lack of evidence.

Overview of the immunopathological roles of HMGB1 and histones in critical illness

HMGB1

HMGB1, a multifunctional and highly conserved nucleoprotein with two positively charged DNA-binding regions and a negatively charged tail, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple critical illnesses, including sepsis [11], acute liver failure [13, 36] and severe trauma [37]. HMGB1 is usually released by activated macrophages as an alarmin during prolonged inflammation [38, 39]. HMGB1 signals through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), the receptor for advanced glycation end products, the NF-κB-inflammasome and/or the CXCL-12-CXCR4-NF-κB-inflammasome axis and induces inflammation and organ damage even in the absence of infection [11, 40, 41]. Circulating HMGB1 also interacts with the complement cascade to augment sterile inflammation in critical illness [42, 43]. In both experimental sepsis models and in sepsis patients, the levels of HMGB1 in the plasma are markedly increased, which positively correlates with disease severity [11]. Emerging evidence shows that acute liver failure patients/animals have high concentrations of circulating HMGB1, which can contribute to multiple organ injuries and mediate gut bacterial translocation [13]. A recent observational study by Yang et al. further found significantly increased plasma concentrations of HMGB1 in combat casualties on arrival to the hospital correlated positively with blood inflammatory mediators [44]. An in vivo study showed that CX-01 (2-O,3-O-desulfated heparin) with < 5% anticoagulant activity significantly inhibited systemic HMGB1 activity, decreased local and systemic inflammatory responses, and reduced tissue and organ damage in a blast injury-induced trauma rat model [44]. Many studies have claimed a positive correlation between extracellular HMGB1 and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) severity in recent decades [15]. Moreover, HMGB1 also contributes to the development of MODS secondary to SAP, and blockade of HMGB1 by its neutralizing antibody could significantly attenuate the development of SAP and SAP-associated organ dysfunction [28, 45]. These results collectively suggest that circulating HMGB1 is a promising immunomodulation target in critical illness.

Circulating histones

Beyond HMGB1, histones are another group of basic nucleoproteins mainly derived from neutrophil extracellular traps that contribute to a dysregulated inflammatory response, activation of the coagulation system and organ dysfunction in sepsis [12], liver failure [13, 26], trauma [16, 46], SAP [14, 47], acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [48, 49] and COVID-19 [18]. Circulating histones, also known as extracellular histones, significantly activate TLR-dependent and NLPR3 inflammasome pathways to trigger the host innate immune response, resulting in the activation of the NF-κB pathway and subsequent release of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β and IL-18 [12, 50, 51]. Histones also exert potent cytotoxicity to vascular endothelial cells in a dose-dependent manner by binding to phospholipid–phosphodiester bonds in cell membranes and thus altering membrane permeability and initiating calcium ion influx [16, 52]. Meanwhile, histones mediate the disruption of endothelial barrier function and vascular permeability by inducing oxidative stress and pyroptosis in endothelial cells [53, 54], disrupting cell–cell adherens junctions [55, 56], upregulating the expression of adhesion molecules ICAM1, VCAM1, and E-selectin [55, 57, 58], and impairing the endothelial glycocalyx [59, 60]. Furthermore, histone-induced proinflammatory cytokine release and vascular endothelial injury will unfortunately disrupt the fine balance and cross talk between coagulant, anticoagulant and inflammatory pathways to trigger, amplify and propagate disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) [61]. Recent studies have also shown that histones in the blood circulation significantly increase tissue factor expression in endothelial cells and monocytes [62, 63], increase lytic cell death of macrophages and phosphatidylserine exposure [64], reduce endogenous anticoagulant activity of vascular endothelium [65], and induce platelet activation, aggregation and consumption [66, 67] to mediate DIC. It is noteworthy that such deleterious effects of histones can be blocked by heparin, and thus, developing anti-histone agents (heparin or heparinoids) holds great potential for reducing MODS and improving the survival of critically ill patients. Our previous publications have also summarized the immunopathological roles of histones in mediating sterile inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, coagulation activation and organ dysfunction and concluded that circulating histones are promising immunomodulation targets in multiple critical illnesses [12, 68].

Removal of HMGB1 and histones by hemofiltration or hemoperfusion

Hemofiltration

AN69ST membrane

The AN69ST membrane is a surface-treated polyacrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate membrane that has excellent adsorption capacities for cytokines owing to its anionic hydrogel structure [69,70,71]. For instance, Shiga et al. found that the AN69ST membrane significantly decreased the mean blood IL-6 and lactate levels in patients with septic shock after a 72-h continuous hemodiafiltration therapy [71]. In a mono-compartmental in vitro model containing 100 μg of HMGB1 and 35 g of bovine albumin, it was shown that hemofiltration using the AN69ST membrane had superior adsorption capacity for HMGB1 than the polymethylmethacrylate, polyethersulfone and polysulfone membranes [72]. The reduction ratios of HMGB1 by the AN69ST membrane during 60 min and 360 min were 97.3% and 99.3%, respectively, with a high HMGB1 clearance of 60.8 ± 5.0 mL/min at 15 min [72]. More recently, another in vitro study by Tomoyuki et al. showed that the AN69ST membrane primarily removes 93.6–99.3% of HMGB1 in bovine serum albumin-spiked substitution fluid by bulk adsorption without any sign of adsorption saturation. Meanwhile, the HMGB1 clearances by the AN69ST membrane at 0, 10 and 30 min were consistently high over the 360-min course (52.8–60.3 mL/min) with a high HMGB1 adsorption capacity of 700 μg [34]. Therefore, hemofiltration with the AN69ST membrane could eliminate lethal levels of both HMGB1 and proinflammatory cytokines in septic patients. Further clinical studies are urgently needed to evaluate the impact of the use of the AN69ST membrane to remove HMGB1 on patient-centered clinical outcomes. As the polyethyleneimine layer of the AN69ST membrane can also adsorb heparin to allow heparin priming before use [7], it is also of clinical significance to further determine whether the use of the AN69ST hemofilter is able to remove positively charged histones by the primed heparin layer from the blood of critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

Polymethylmethacrylate membrane

The polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane was first developed by Toray Industries, Inc., and has been widely used in both chronic dialysis and sepsis patients [73]. Since the 2010s, it has been well established that continuous hemodiafiltration with the PMMA membrane could remove various proinflammatory cytokines from the bloodstream mainly by adsorption rather than convection and diffusion [74, 75]. A small-size clinical study even observed a higher 28-day survival in 43 septic shock patients with acute kidney failure who received continuous hemofiltration with the PMMA membrane than in those with a polyacrylonitrile membrane (83.3% vs. 30.8%) [73]. Furthermore, the PMMA membrane also showed a considerable HMGB1 adsorption clearance of 25.8 ± 4.8 mL/min at 15 min, nearly half of the adsorption capacity of the AN69ST membrane [72]. More recently, Ryusuke et al. investigated the effect of pore structures and sizes of three PMMA membrane fibers on their HMGB1 adsorption capacities and found that the obtained HKT fiber with a surface pore size of 41.4 nm exhibited the highest HMGB1 adsorption capacity of 1879 ± 414 ng/g among the three fibers tested [76]. The biocompatibility and HMGB1 adsorption performance of the HKT column were further studied in a d-galactosamine-induced acute liver failure swine model. The ratio of HMGB1 at the outlet versus the inlet was less than one-third throughout the 4-h hemoperfusion with the HKT column, suggesting high-performance plasma HMGB1 reduction using the porous HKT fiber for extracorporeal hemoperfusion in large animals. However, the potential survival benefit of HKT column hemoperfusion should be determined in other types of liver failure animal models because the animals in the present d-galactosamine models are too severe to survive long enough.

Hemoperfusion

Hemoperfusion is a modality for EBP in which solute removal is achieved by binding molecules to adsorbent materials [3]. Unlike indirect solute removal by hemodialysis membranes through the mechanism of convection and diffusion, hemoperfusion allows direct adsorption of specific substances using hemoperfusion cartridges with large surface areas and high adsorptive capacities [3]. Furthermore, insufficient substance adsorption by the abovementioned AN69ST or PMMA membranes might unfortunately lead to membrane fouling and negatively affect the removal of small- to medium-sized solutes during EBP sessions. Accordingly, hemoperfusion cartridges with specific or nonspecific solute removal spectra are of great clinical significance in the management of critically ill patients without the need for traditional renal replacement.

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion cartridge

The polymyxin B hemoperfusion cartridge (PMX, Toray Industries, Tokyo, Japan) is an adsorbent cartridge composed of polystyrene fibers bound to polymyxin B that is marketed in Japan and Europe for the removal of endotoxins during sepsis and septic shock. It is well established that endotoxin levels decrease in vitro within minutes after starting PMX hemoperfusion [77]. However, the survival benefit of PMX hemoperfusion in septic patients remains controversial. Data from the EUPHAS trial demonstrated that PMX treatment was associated with a mortality benefit [28-day mortality: 32% in the PMX group vs. 53% in the control group; adjusted hazard ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16–0.80] and a hemodynamic benefit in 64 patients with abdominal septic shock [78]. In contrast, the ABDOMIX trial enrolling 243 septic shock patients with peritonitis reported an insignificant difference in 28-day mortality of 27% in the PMX group and 19.5% in the control group (odds ratio 1.5872, 95% CI 0.8583–2.935, p = 0.14) [79]. More recently, the EUPHRATES trial included 450 adult critically ill patients with septic shock and an endotoxin activity assay level of 0.60 or higher to determine the effect of PMX hemoperfusion on 28-day mortality of septic patients. The results showed that PMX treatment was not associated with a significant difference in 28-day mortality among all participants (37.7% in the PMX group and 34.5% in the control group, relative risk 1.09, 95% CI 0.85–1.39, p = 0.49) [80]. For the first time, the EUPHRATES trial applied the endotoxin activity assay as a criterion to enroll patients, making PMX treatment potentially open to monitoring. A subsequent post hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial successfully demonstrated that PMX hemoperfusion significantly decreased 28-day mortality from 41.9 to 20% along with improved hemodynamics when the target population was narrowed to patients with endotoxin activity assay measurements between 0.6 and 0.9 [81]. Accordingly, the identification of appropriate recipients for PMX treatment by the endotoxin activity assay may have the potential to improve patient survival.

Beyond the elimination of endotoxin, PMX hemoperfusion also plays a vital role in the removal of HMGB1. As early as 2007, Sakamoto et al. demonstrated that HMGB-1 levels improved significantly in septic shock patients after successful PMX hemoperfusion in a retrospective study [82]. Likewise, another study enrolling 20 septic patients with ARDS found that direct hemoperfusion with a PMX column significantly decreased blood HMGB1 levels from 26.5 ± 12.5 to 2.8 ± 0.6 ng/mL [39]. Similar results were obtained in a later small-size study by the same research group in which the significant decrease in HMGB1 level was correlated with that in endotoxin [83]. Given that PMX is a medical device that aims to remove circulating endotoxin by adsorption, the reduction in circulating HMGB1 by PMX may be attributed to the blockade of the HMGB1-receptor for advanced glycation end-products axis through reduction of endotoxin and subsequent interleukin-6 [83].

Cytosorb adsorber

The Cytosorb adsorber has long been approved for the removal of cytokines, bilirubin, and myoglobin by hemoperfusion [84, 85]. The adsorber consists of a cylindrical cartridge filled with tiny, highly porous, hemocompatible polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated polystyrene-divinyl-benzene copolymer beads with a total surface area of > 40,000 m2, which significantly adsorbs hydrophobic cytokine molecules within the 5–55 kDa molecular weight range (see Fig. 1a and b) [86, 87]. In the last decade, the effect of EBP with Cytosorb adsorber on multiple critical illnesses, including infective endocarditis [88, 89], SAP [90], severe COVID-19 [91, 92], postcardiac arrest syndrome [93] and septic shock [94], has been extensively investigated in numerous RCTs and matched cohort studies. Although most of the related studies showed that the use of the Cytosorb hemofilter in severe patients with systemic cytokine storms considerably decreased serum levels of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, significant survival benefits of Cytosorb hemoadsorption have not been confirmed [85]. Recently, an in vitro experiment showed that Cytosorb® could not only reduce the levels of the cytokines MIP1-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ by 98 ± 4.0%, 91 ± 3.0% and 82 ± 15% in whole blood but also remove 83%-98% of DAMPs C5a, HMGB-1, procalcitonin, and S100-A8, which relies on a combination of pore capture and surface adsorption (see Fig. 1c) [87]. Subsequently, Weber et al. found that a 6-h hemadsorption procedure by the Cytosorb adsorber significantly decreased circulating histone levels in the blood of 22 humans with multiple injuries (see Fig. 1d and e) [33]. These studies collectively suggest that Cytosorb hemoperfusion may offer a therapeutic approach in critically ill patients via control of the massive release of various DAMPs, such as extracellular HMGB1 and histones.

Fig. 1
figure 1

© 2018 Gruda et al.); d Hemoadsorption of different concentrations of histones presented as percentage of reduction (%) after 6-h incubation with Cytosorb® adsorber (© 2020 Weber et al.); e Plasma histone levels of 22 multiple injured humans (µg/mL) in the Emergency room (pre) and after 6-h hemoadsorption (post) (© 2020 Weber et al.)

Structure, adsorption spectrum and HMGB1/histone adsorption performance of the Cytosorb® adsorber. a Microstructure of the Cytosorb® adsorber (©2022 Cytosorbents Europe GMBH); b Cytosorb adsorption spectrum (©2022 Cytosorbents Europe GMBH); c Adsorption of HMGB1 from whole blood with Cytosorb® adsorber or a control device (

Full size image

Heparin-functionalized adsorbents

Heparin, a commonly used anticoagulant in clinical practice, has a high negative charge density and a strong affinity for cationic HMGB1 and histones [58, 95]. Using biolayer interferometry, Sharma et al. demonstrated that both unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin bind histone subunits with high affinities (Kd < 1 pM-66.7 nM), whereas fondaparinux, a heparinoid, exhibited a low affinity (Kd of 3.06 µM-81.1 mM) [96]. Growing evidence has also shown that heparin administration in sepsis models could significantly alleviate the histone-mediated inflammatory response, endothelial dysfunction and lethality [58, 60]. A recent meta-analysis including 2617 participants from 15 RCTs also found that heparin may significantly reduce MODS incidence and 28-d mortality in adult septic patients [97]. However, the increased risk of fatal hemorrhage associated with heparin use in critically ill patients with coagulation disorders remains a major safety concern that limits its wide use in clinical practice. In contrast, extracorporeal hemoperfusion with heparin-functionalized adsorbents may significantly eliminate circulating HMGB1 and histones to exert their immunomodulatory effects. For instance, Marie et al. found that both Seraph-100 and heparin-immobilized Sepharose beads could result in efficient depletion of histone levels in septic plasma samples [35]. Compared to the untreated control, HMGB1 levels were also lowered by both heparin-functionalized adsorbents, resulting in reductions of 58.9 ± 14.7% for Seraph-100 and 63.1 ± 12.2% for heparin Sepharose. More importantly, heparin-functionalized adsorbents could further exert beneficial effects by binding and depleting activated PF4 + platelets and PF4 + platelet extracellular vesicles, thereby contributing to the alleviation of immune thrombosis in sepsis and COVID-19 at multiple levels [35]. Recently, we also developed novel heparin-grated chitosan (CSCEHEP) beads as promising hemoperfusion adsorbents for the selective removal of histones in the blood of septic patients (see Fig. 2) [98]. The results of the batch adsorption experiment showed that the histone adsorption capacity of the CSCEHEP beads increased significantly from 39.9 to 314.3 μg/g, with a reduction rate of 62.8%, compared to that of unmodified chitosan (CSCE) beads. Meanwhile, the CSCEHEP beads significantly antagonized histone-induced cytotoxicity, inflammatory cytokine release and thrombocytopenia. The CSCEHEP beads also prolonged the clotting times of plasma by three times without obvious adverse blood-material reactions, including hemolysis, platelet activation and complement activation, suggesting the satisfactory hemocompatibility of the CSCEHEP beads. Therefore, it is believed that the use of CSCEHEP beads as histone sorbents in EBP sessions may provide novel insight into the modulation of aberrant immune responses in patients with sepsis. Further translational research of these adsorbents in large sepsis animal models is ongoing.

Fig. 2
figure 2

© 2022 by the authors)

Preparation, characterization and anti-histone properties of heparin-grated chitosan (CSCEHEP) beads. a Scheme of the heparin-grafting procedure on chitosan beads; b Chemical structure of the CSCEHEP beads determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; c Clotting times of plasma after incubation with the CSCEHEP beads; d Histone and BSA adsorption capacities of the CSCEHEP and CSCE beads in batch adsorption experiments; e Histone adsorption capacities of the CSCEHEP beads under different histone concentrations; f Effect of the CSCEHEP beads on antagonizing histone-induced cytotoxicity (

Full size image

Conclusions and perspectives

In summary, circulating HMGB1 and histones are the main contributors to inflammation, immune thrombosis, endothelial dysfunction and MODS, which significantly correlate with disease severity and patient-centered outcomes in multiple critical illnesses. Preclinical studies consistently demonstrated that various hemofilters could remarkably eliminate either HMGB1 or histones mainly by the adsorption mechanism, thereby alleviating DAMP-mediated immunopathological effects. However, these encouraging findings should be further confirmed in well-designed clinical trials to determine the optimal initial timing and treatment duration of EBP with such hemofilters, as the precise pharmacokinetics of circulating HMGB1 and histones in critically ill patients remain poorly understood.

Heparin is the most widely used anti-histone agent at present. However, the direct use of heparin in critically ill patients with coagulopathy is contraindicated because the anticoagulant property of heparin will undoubtedly increase the risk of bleeding in these patients. Recently, Sharma et al. found that the ability of heparin to neutralize the cytotoxic and procoagulant effects of histones requires heparin fragments > 1.7 kDa and is independent of the antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide [96], suggesting that non-anticoagulant heparin variants or heparinoids may have therapeutic potential in critical illnesses associated with elevated levels of histones [99,100,101]. For instance, Karin et al. developed antithrombin affinity-depleted heparin (AADH) by removing the anticoagulant fraction from unfractionated heparin via affinity chromatography. Their results showed that AADH significantly bound histones, prevented histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and reduced mortality from sterile inflammation and sepsis in mouse models [99]. More importantly, AADH treatment of normal mice with a dose five times that of unfractionated heparin caused only moderate anticoagulation of blood plasma and no significant prolongation of tail bleeding time. Similarly, Jine et al. found that a homogeneous chondroitin sulfate E oligosaccharide (CS-E 19-mer) could exert an anti-inflammatory effect by interacting with histones directly and decrease organ damage and mortality in a mouse model of sepsis induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide without increasing the risk of bleeding [100]. Most recently, the same research group further synthesized a heparan sulfate octadecasaccharide that could not only inhibit the proinflammatory activity of extracellular histone H3 and HMGB1, but also elicit the actions of apolipoprotein A-I to dissociate the complex of HMGB1 and lipopolysaccharide [102]. These encouraging explorations significantly enhance our understanding of the mechanism of action by which non-anticoagulant heparin variants mitigate inflammatory damage and improve survival in sepsis by targeting extracellular histones and HMGB1.

As outlined, hemoperfusion with heparin-functionalized adsorbents also represents an alternative to heparin administration in these critically ill patients to reduce the deleterious effects of HMGB1 and histones. Heparin grafting is a general way to improve the blood compatibility of blood-contacting biomaterials [103, 104], and heparin-grafted membranes are conventionally used in chronic hemodialysis patients at increased risk of hemorrhage [105]. The results of the HepZero study demonstrated that the use of a heparin-grafted membrane is a safe, helpful and easy-to-use method for heparin-free hemodialysis in patients at increased risk of hemorrhage [106]. Similarly, we can speculate that the use of heparin-functionalized adsorbents such as Seraph-100, heparin-immobilized Sepharose beads and our heparin-grated chitosan beads in EBP sessions is theoretically beneficial for the reduction of bleeding risk in critically ill patients.

Beyond heparin-functionalized adsorbents, the direct use of hydrogel-based adsorbents with heparin-mimicking functional groups is also promising for the removal of multiple metabolic wastes by hemoadsorption [104]. For instance, we have successfully developed several self-anticoagulant hydrogel-based adsorbents that share similar structures with heparin in their polymer chains to adsorb endotoxin, bilirubin and low-density lipoprotein from the blood circulation [107,108,109]. In one of our most recent works, we designed polyethersulfone-based anticoagulant hydrogel microspheres (AHMs) that remarkably bind intrinsic coagulation factors and calcium ions in the extracorporeal circuit to achieve local anticoagulation for heparin-free EBP sessions [110]. These AHMs are composed of a negatively charged copolymer of acrylic acid and 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-prroanesulfonic acid. Our preliminary experiment shows that AHMs could significantly adsorb ~ 90% of histones in aqueous solution. Therefore, we speculate that AHMs are promising candidate hemoperfusion sorbents that can modulate dysregulated inflammation, immune thrombosis, endothelial dysfunction and MODS in multiple critical illnesses by adsorbing circulating HMGB1 and histones. Further investigation of the effect of AHMs on eliminating histones and alleviating inflammation in large animal models of sepsis is still ongoing.

It is noteworthy that the removal of circulating HMGB1 and histones might also be associated with potential harm to the human body. For instance, Lange and colleagues demonstrated that HMGB1 significantly contributed to the error-free repair of DNA lesions [111]. Its absence can lead to increased mutagenesis, decreased cell survival and altered chromatin reorganization after DNA damage. More recently, Wu et al. conducted a prospective study enrolling 43 patients with AKI to investigate the association of the removal of DAMPs with mortality in sepsis patients undergoing continuous veno-venous hemofiltration [112]. The results showed that patient survival was significantly worse in groups with higher clearance rates of heat shock protein 70 and HMGB1. Moreover, growing evidence also shows that histones may exert an antimicrobial activity by binding to bacterial nucleic acids and lipopolysaccharides, changing the permeability of the bacterial cell membrane, and inhibiting viral binding and thus playing a vital role in host innate immunity [113]. Therefore, further clinical studies are urgently needed to determine the thresholds of plasma HMGB1 and histone levels for initiating, monitoring or discontinuing EBP with a balanced immunomodulation effect on the innate and adaptive responses. Objective and regular measurements of plasma HMGB1 and histones should also be used to identify homogenous patient populations that benefit most from the elimination of DAMPs. Moreover, the choice of the mortality rate as an endpoint for studies in the ICU setting is potentially fraught with problems. Indeed, a failure to show a survival effect by a certain therapeutic regimen does not simply mean that the regimen is worthless. Future randomized controlled trials should also assess different primary endpoints, such as the number of ventilation-free days, vasopressor therapy-free days, and ICU-free days and the changes of plasma inflammatory mediators, to shed light on other important effects of EBP on critically ill patients [7, 114]. Taken together, the removal of DAMPs during extracorporeal blood purification in critically ill patients with immune dysregulation should be individualized and dynamically changed, and adequate selection of the patient population, treatment dose and type of hemofilters is critically needed.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Reijnders TDY, Saris A, Schultz MJ, van der Poll T. Immunomodulation by macrolides: therapeutic potential for critical care. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(6):619–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ankawi G, Neri M, Zhang J, Breglia A, Ricci Z, Ronco C. Extracorporeal techniques for the treatment of critically ill patients with sepsis beyond conventional blood purification therapy: the promises and the pitfalls. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):262.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ricci Z, Romagnoli S, Reis T, Bellomo R, Ronco C. Hemoperfusion in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(10):1397–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang Q, Li Y, Tuohuti P, Qin Z, Zhang Z, Zhao W, Su B. Advances in the development of biomaterials for endotoxin adsorption in sepsis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9: 699418.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Monard C, Abraham P, Schneider A, Rimmelé T. New targets for extracorporeal blood purification therapies in sepsis. Blood Purif. 2023;52(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Villa G, Neri M, Bellomo R, Cerda J, De Gaudio AR, De Rosa S, Garzotto F, Honore PM, Kellum J, Lorenzin A, et al. Nomenclature for renal replacement therapy and blood purification techniques in critically ill patients: practical applications. Criti Care. 2016;20(1):283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Sun P, Chang K, Yang M, Deng N, Chen S, Su B. Effect of continuous renal replacement therapy with the oxiris hemofilter on critically ill patients: a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gong T, Liu L, Jiang W, Zhou R. DAMP-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(2):95–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zindel J, Kubes P. DAMPs, PAMPs, and LAMPs in immunity and sterile inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020;15:493–518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rumpret M, von Richthofen HJ, Peperzak V, Meyaard L. Inhibitory pattern recognition receptors. J Exp Med. 2022;219(1): e20211463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li L, Lu YQ. The regulatory role of high-mobility group protein 1 in sepsis-related immunity. Fronti Immunol. 2021;11: 601815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Wan D, Luo X, Song T, Wang Y, Yu Q, Jiang L, Liao R, Zhao W, Su B. Circulating histones in sepsis: potential outcome predictors and therapeutic targets. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 650184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang R, Zou X, Tenhunen J, Tonnessen TI. HMGB1 and extracellular histones significantly contribute to systemic inflammation and multiple organ failure in acute liver failure. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:5928078.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Szatmary P, Liu T, Abrams ST, Voronina S, Wen L, Chvanov M, Huang W, Wang G, Criddle DN, Tepikin AV, et al. Systemic histone release disrupts plasmalemma and contributes to necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2017;17(6):884–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shen X, Li WQ. High-mobility group box 1 protein and its role in severe acute pancreatitis. Orld J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(5):1424–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abrams ST, Zhang N, Manson J, Liu T, Dart C, Baluwa F, Wang SS, Brohi K, Kipar A, Yu W, et al. Circulating histones are mediators of trauma-associated lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(2):160–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw RJ, Abrams ST, Austin J, Taylor JM, Lane S, Dutt T, Downey C, Du M, Turtle L, Baillie JK, et al. Circulating histones play a central role in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and mortality. Haematologica. 2021;106(9):2493–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. de Vries F, Huckriede J, Wichapong K, Reutelingsperger C, Nicolaes GAF. The role of extracellular histones in COVID-19. J Intern Med. 2023;293(3):275–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu T, Huang W, Szatmary P, Abrams ST, Alhamdi Y, Lin Z, Greenhalf W, Wang G, Sutton R, Toh CH. Accuracy of circulating histones in predicting persistent organ failure and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2017;104(9):1215–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Alhamdi Y, Abrams ST, Cheng Z, Jing S, Su D, Liu Z, Lane S, Welters I, Wang G, Toh C-H. Circulating histones are major mediators of cardiac injury in patients with sepsis. Criti Care Med. 2015;43(10):2094–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu NF, Jiang L, Zhu B, Yang DG, Zheng RQ, Shao J, Xi XM. Elevated plasma histone H4 level predicts increased risk of mortality in patients with sepsis. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9(3):1084–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wen Z, Lei Z, Yao L, Jiang P, Gu T, Ren F, Liu Y, Gou C, Li X, Wen T. Circulating histones are major mediators of systemic inflammation and cellular injury in patients with acute liver failure. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(9): e2391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ng H, Havervall S, Rosell A, Aguilera K, Parv K, von Meijenfeldt FA, Lisman T, Mackman N, Thalin C, Phillipson M. Circulating markers of neutrophil extracellular traps are of prognostic value in patients With COVID-19. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(2):988–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang H, Ochani M, Li JH, Qiang XL, Tanovic M, Harris HE, Susarla SM, Ulloa L, Wang H, DiRaimo R, et al. Reversing established sepsis with antagonists of endogenous high-mobility group box 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(1):296–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang W, Sun L, Deng YH, Tang J. Synergistic effects of antibodies against high-mobility group box 1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies on D-(+)-galactosamine hydrochloride/lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver failure. FEBS J. 2013;280(6):1409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wen Z, Liu Y, Li F, Ren F, Chen D, Li X, Wen T. Circulating histones exacerbate inflammation in mice with acute liver failure. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114(10):2384–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng Z, Abrams ST, Alhamdi Y, Toh J, Yu W, Wang G, Toh C-H. Circulating histones are major mediators of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in acute critical illnesses. Criti Care Med. 2019;47(8):E677–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sawa H, Ueda T, Takeyama Y, Yasuda T, Shinzeki M, Nakajima T, Kuroda Y. Blockade of high mobility group box-1 protein attenuates experimental severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(47):7666–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu C, Liang Y, Li X, Chen N, Ma X. Unfractionated heparin attenuates histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and prevents intestinal microcirculatory dysfunction in histone-infused rats. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(3):614–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu C, Liang Y, Liu Y, Shu W, Luan Z, Ma X. Unfractionated heparin protects microcirculation in endotoxemic rats by antagonizing histones. J Surg Res. 2023;282:84–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li L, Ling Y, Huang M, Yin T, Gou SM, Zhan NY, Xiong JX, Wu HS, Yang ZY, Wang CY. Heparin inhibits the inflammatory response induced by LPS and HMGB1 by blocking the binding of HMGB1 to the surface of macrophages. Cytokine. 2015;72(1):36–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Luan ZG, Hu B, Wu L, Jin SZ, Ma XC, Zhang J, Wang AP. Unfractionated heparin alleviates human lung endothelial barrier dysfunction induced by high mobility group box 1 through regulation of p38-gsk3 beta-snail signaling pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(5):1907–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weber B, Lackner I, Baur M, Fois G, Gebhard F, Marzi I, Schrezenmeier H, Relja B, Kalbitz M. Effects of circulating HMGB-1 and histones on cardiomyocytes-hemadsorption of these DAMPs as therapeutic strategy after multiple trauma. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakamura T, Moriyama K, Shimomura Y, Kato Y, Kuriyama N, Hara Y, Yamada S, Nishida O. Adsorption kinetics of high mobility group box 1 protein in a polyacrylonitrile hemofiltration membrane. Ther Apher Dial. 2021;25(1):66–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ebeyer-Masotta M, Eichhorn T, Weiss R, Semak V, Lauková L, Fischer MB, Weber V. Heparin-functionalized adsorbents eliminate central effectors of immunothrombosis, including platelet factor 4, high-mobility group box 1 protein and histones. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamamoto T, Tajima Y. HMGB1 is a promising therapeutic target for acute liver failure. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;11(7):673–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Deng M, Scott MJ, Fan J, Billiar TR. Location is the key to function: HMGB1 in sepsis and trauma-induced inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;106(1):161–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, Vishnubhakat JM, Ombrellino M, Che J, Frazier A, Yang H, Ivanova S, Borovikova L, et al. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science. 1999;285(5425):248–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nakamura T, Fujiwara N, Sato E, Kawagoe Y, Ueda Y, Yamada S, Koide H. Effect of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber hemoperfusion on serum high mobility group box-1 protein levels and oxidative stress in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. ASAIO J. 2009;55(4):395–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Venereau E, Schiraldi M, Uguccioni M, Bianchi ME. HMGB1 and leukocyte migration during trauma and sterile inflammation. Mol Immunol. 2013;55(1):76–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Andersson U, Tracey KJ. HMGB1 Is a therapeutic target for sterile inflammation and infection. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:139–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SY, Son M, Lee SE, Park IH, Kwak MS, Han M, Lee HS, Kim ES, Kim J-Y, Lee JE, et al. High-mobility group box 1-induced complement activation causes sterile inflammation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Li YS, Yang ZS, Chavko M, Liu B, Aderemi OA, Simovic MO, Dubick MA, Cancio LC. Complement inhibition ameliorates blast-induced acute lung injury in rats: potential role of complement in intracellular HMGB1-mediated inflammation. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang Z, Simovic MO, Edsall PR, Liu B, Cancio TS, Batchinsky AI, Cancio LC, Li Y. HMGB1 inhibition to ameliorate organ failure and increase survival in trauma. Biomolecules. 2022;12(1):101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen X, Zhao HX, Bai C, Zhou XY. Blockade of high-mobility group box 1 attenuates intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction in experimental acute pancreatitis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6799.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Johansson PI, Windelov NA, Rasmussen LS, Sorensen AM, Ostrowski SR. Blood levels of histone-complexed DNA fragments are associated with coagulopathy, inflammation and endothelial damage early after trauma. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2013;6(3):171–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ou X, Cheng Z, Liu T, Tang Z, Huang W, Szatmary P, Zheng S, Sutton R, Toh CH, Zhang N, et al. Circulating histone levels reflect disease severity in animal models of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2015;44(7):1089–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lv X, Wen T, Song J, Xie D, Wu L, Jiang X, Jiang P, Wen Z. Extracellular histones are clinically relevant mediators in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Res. 2017;18(1):165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lefrancais E, Looney MR. Neutralizing extracellular histones in acute respiratory distress syndrome a new role for an endogenous pathway. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(2):122–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Allam R, Kumar SVR, Darisipudi MN, Anders H-J. Extracellular histones in tissue injury and inflammation. J Mol Med. 2014;92(5):465–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zetoune FS, Ward PA. Role of Complement and Histones in Sepsis. Fronti Med. 2020;7: 616957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R, Monestier M, Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, Taylor FB, Esmon NL, Lupu F, Esmon CT. Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med. 2009;15(11):1318-U1117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Pérez-Cremades D, Bueno-Betí C, García-Giménez JL, Ibañez-Cabellos JS, Pallardó FV, Hermenegildo C, Novella S. Extracellular histones trigger oxidative stress-dependent induction of the NF-kB/CAM pathway via TLR4 in endothelial cells. J Physiol Biochem. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-022-00935-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Beltrán-García J, Osca-Verdegal R, Pérez-Cremades D, Novella S, Hermenegildo C, Pallardó FV, García-Giménez JL. Extracellular histones activate endothelial NLRP3 inflammasome and are associated with a severe sepsis phenotype. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:4217–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ramasubramanian B, Kim J, Ke Y, Li Y, Zhang CO, Promnares K, Tanaka KA, Birukov KG, Karki P, Birukova AA. Mechanisms of pulmonary endothelial permeability and inflammation caused by extracellular histone subunits H3 and H4. FASEB J. 2022;36(9): e22470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cui XY, Stavik B, Thiede B, Sandset PM, Kanse SM. FSAP protects against histone-mediated increase in endothelial permeability in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):13706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim J, Baalachandran R, Li Y, Zhang CO, Ke Y, Karki P, Birukov KG, Birukova AA. Circulating extracellular histones exacerbate acute lung injury by augmenting pulmonary endothelial dysfunction via TLR4-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2022;323(3):L223-l239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Arnaud M, Loiselle M, Vaganay C, Pons S, Letavernier E, Demonchy J, Fodil S, Nouacer M, Placier S, Frère P, et al. Tumor lysis syndrome and AKI: beyond crystal mechanisms. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(6):1154–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang Y, Xu F, Guan L, Chen M, Zhao Y, Guo L, Li X, Zheng Y, Gao A, Li S. Histone H4 induces heparan sulfate degradation by activating heparanase in chlorine gas-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Res. 2022;23(1):14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Fu S, Yu S, Zhao Y, Ma X, Li X. Unfractionated heparin attenuated histone-induced pulmonary syndecan-1 degradation in mice: a preliminary study on the roles of heparinase pathway. Inflammation. 2022;45(2):712–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Alhamdi Y, Toh C-H. Recent advances in pathophysiology of disseminated intravascular coagulation: the role of circulating histones and neutrophil extracellular traps. F1000Res. 2017;6:2143–2143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Kim JE, Yoo HJ, Gu JY, Kim HK. Histones induce the procoagulant phenotype of endothelial cells through tissue factor up-regulation and thrombomodulin down-regulation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6): e0156763.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gould TJ, Lysov Z, Swystun LL, Dwivedi DJ, Zarychanski R, Fox-Robichaud AE, Liaw PC. Canadian critical care T. extracellular histones increase tissue factor activity and enhance thrombin generation by human blood monocytes. Shock. 2016;46(6):655–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang Y, Wu C, Li L, Pandeya A, Zhang G, Cui J, Kirchhofer D, Wood JP, Smyth SS, Wei Y, et al. Extracellular histones trigger disseminated intravascular coagulation by lytic cell death. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(12):6800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, Xu J, Esmon NL, Esmon CT. Extracellular histones increase plasma thrombin generation by impairing thrombomodulin-dependent protein C activation. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(9):1795–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Fuchs TA, Bhandari AA, Wagner DD. Histones induce rapid and profound thrombocytopenia in mice. Blood. 2011;118(13):3708–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Alhamdi Y, Abrams ST, Lane S, Wang GZ, Toh CH. Histone-associated thrombocytopenia in patients who are critically Ill. JAMA. 2016;315(8):817–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Yang T, Li Y, Su B. Understanding the multiple roles of extracellular histones in mediating endothelial dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(10):1951–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Moriyama K, Kato Y, Hasegawa D, Kurimoto Y, Kawaji T, Nakamura T, Kuriyama N, Shimomura Y, Nishida O. Involvement of ionic interactions in cytokine adsorption of polyethyleneimine-coated polyacrylonitrile and polymethyl methacrylate membranes in vitro. J Artifi Organs. 2020;23(3):240–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Hayashi K, Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H, Nakajima M, Ohbe H, Ono K, Yasunaga H. Clinical effect of the acrylonitrile-Co-methallyl sulfonate surface-treated membrane as a cytokine adsorption therapy for sepsis due to acute panperitonitis: a retrospective cohort study. Blood Purif. 2020;49(3):364–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Shiga H, Hirasawa H, Nishida O, Oda S, Nakamura M, Mashiko K, Matsuda K, Kitamura N, Kikuchi Y, Fuke N. Continuous hemodiafiltration with a cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter in patients with septic shock: a preliminary report. Blood Purif. 2014;38(3–4):211–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Yumoto M, Nishida O, Moriyama K, Shimomura Y, Nakamura T, Kuriyama N, Hara Y, Yamada S. In vitro evaluation of high mobility group box 1 protein removal with various membranes for continuous hemofiltration. Ther Apher Dial. 2011;15(4):385–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Matsuda K, Moriguchi T, Harii N, Yanagisawa M, Harada D, Sugawara H. Comparison of efficacy between continuous hemodiafiltration with a PMMA high-performance membrane dialyzer and a PAN membrane hemofilter in the treatment of septic shock patients with acute renal failure. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;173:182–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nakamura M, Oda S, Sadahiro T, Hirayama Y, Watanabe E, Tateishi Y, Nakada T, Hirasawa H. Treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock by CHDF using a PMMA membrane hemofilter as a cytokine modulator. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;166:73–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Matsuda K, Moriguchi T, Oda S, Hirasawa H. Efficacy of continuous hemodiafiltration with a cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;166:83–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Amemiya R, Shinoda M, Yamada M, Ueno Y, Shimada K, Fujieda H, Yagi H, Mizota T, Nishiyama R, Oshima G, et al. Hemoadsorption of high-mobility-group box 1 using a porous polymethylmethacrylate fiber in a swine acute liver failure model. Int J Artif Organs. 2018;41(4):190–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Shimizu T, Miyake T, Tani M. History and current status of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column for treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1(2):105–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, Foltran F, Brienza N, Donati A, Malcangi V, Petrini F, Volta G, Bobbio Pallavicini FM, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301(23):2445–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Payen DM, Guilhot J, Launey Y, Lukaszewicz AC, Kaaki M, Veber B, Pottecher J, Joannes-Boyau O, Martin-Lefevre L, Jabaudon M, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(6):975–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Dellinger RP, Bagshaw SM, Antonelli M, Foster DM, Klein DJ, Marshall JC, Palevsky PM, Weisberg LS, Schorr CA, Trzeciak S, et al. Effect of targeted Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion on 28-Day mortality in patients with septic shock and elevated endotoxin level: the EUPHRATES randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(14):1455–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Klein DJ, Foster D, Walker PM, Bagshaw SM, Mekonnen H, Antonelli M. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion in endotoxemic septic shock patients without extreme endotoxemia: a post hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(12):2205–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Sakamoto Y, Mashiko K, Matsumoto H, Hara Y, Kutsukata N, Yamamoto Y. Relationship between effect of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber and high-mobility group box-1 protein in septic shock patients. ASAIO J. 2007;53(3):324–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Nakamura T, Sato E, Fujiwara N, Kawagoe Y, Maeda S, Yamagishi S. Suppression of high-mobility group box-1 and receptor for advanced glycation end-product axis by polymyxin B-immobilized fiber hemoperfusion in septic shock patients. J Criti Care. 2011;26(6):546–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Sekandarzad A, Weber E, Prager EP, Graf E, Bettinger D, Wengenmayer T, Supady A. Cytokine adsorption in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (CYTOHEP)-a single center, open-label, three-arm, randomized, controlled intervention trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):222–222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Köhler T, Schwier E, Praxenthaler J, Kirchner C, Henzler D, Eickmeyer C. Therapeutic modulation of the host defense by hemoadsorption with cytosorb(®)-basics, indications and perspectives-a scoping review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(23):12786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Eichhorn T, Rauscher S, Hammer C, Gröger M, Fischer MB, Weber V. Polystyrene-divinylbenzene-based adsorbents reduce endothelial activation and monocyte adhesion under septic conditions in a pore size-dependent manner. Inflammation. 2016;39(5):1737–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Gruda MC, Ruggeberg KG, O'Sullivan P, Guliashvili T, Scheirer AR, Golobish TD, Capponi VJ, Chan PP. Broad adsorption of sepsis-related PAMP and DAMP molecules, mycotoxins, and cytokines from whole blood using CytoSorb® sorbent porous polymer beads. PLoS One 2018;13(1): e0191676.

  88. Diab M, Lehmann T, Bothe W, Akhyari P, Platzer S, Wendt D, Deppe A-C, Strauch J, Hagel S, Gunther A, et al. Cytokine hemoadsorption during cardiac surgery versus standard surgical care for infective endocarditis (REMOVE): results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2022;145(13):959–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Holmen A, Corderfeldt A, Lannemyr L, Dellgren G, Hansson EC. Whole blood adsorber during CPB and need for vasoactive treatment after valve surgery in acute endocarditis: a randomized controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(8):3015–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Rasch S, Sancak S, Erber J, Wiessner J, Schulz D, Huberle C, Alguel H, Schmid RM, Lahmer T. Influence of extracorporeal cytokine adsorption on hemodynamics in severe acute pancreatitis: results of the matched cohort pancreatitis cytosorbents inflammatory cytokine removal (PACIFIC) study. Artif Organs. 2022;46(6):1019–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Stockmann H, Thelen P, Stroben F, Pigorsch M, Keller T, Krannich A, Spies C, Treskatsch S, Ocken M, Kunz JV, et al. CytoSorb rescue for COVID-19 patients with vasoplegic shock and multiple organ failure: a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled pilot study. Criti Care Med. 2022;50(6):964–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Supady A, Weber E, Rieder M, Lother A, Niklaus T, Zahn T, Frech F, Muller S, Kuhl M, Benk C, et al. Cytokine adsorption in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (CYCOV): a single centre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Resp Med. 2021;9(7):755–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Supady A, Zahn T, Kuhl M, Maier S, Benk C, Kaier K, Bottiger BW, Bode C, Lother A, Staudacher DL, et al. Cytokine adsorption in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CYTER) - a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2022;173:169–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Brouwer WP, Duran S, Kuijper M, Ince C. Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb shows a decreased observed versus expected 28-day all-cause mortality in ICU patients with septic shock: a propensity-score-weighted retrospective study. Criti Care. 2019;23(1):317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Tang Y, Wang X, Li Z, He Z, Yang X, Cheng X, Peng Y, Xue Q, Bai Y, Zhang R, et al. Heparin prevents caspase-11-dependent septic lethality independent of anticoagulant properties. Immunity. 2021;54(3):454-467.e456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Sharma N, Haggstrom L, Sohrabipour S, Dwivedi DJ, Liaw PC. Investigations of the effectiveness of heparin variants as inhibitors of histones. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20(6):1485–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Fu S, Yu S, Wang L, Ma X, Li X. Unfractionated heparin improves the clinical efficacy in adult sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Li Y, Song T, Jiang L, Yu Q, Wang L, Xiong Y, Chang K, Deng N, Geng J, Zhao W, et al. A novel hemoperfusion adsorbent for selective removal of circulating histones in septic blood. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2022;37(S3):1202.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Wildhagen KC, García de Frutos P, Reutelingsperger CP, Schrijver R, Aresté C, Ortega-Gómez A, Deckers NM, Hemker HC, Soehnlein O, Nicolaes GA. Nonanticoagulant heparin prevents histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and improves survival in sepsis. Blood. 2014;123(7):1098–1101.

  100. Li J, Sparkenbaugh EM, Su G, Zhang F, Xu Y, Xia K, He P, Baytas S, Pechauer S, Padmanabhan A, et al. Enzymatic synthesis of chondroitin sulfate E to attenuate bacteria lipopolysaccharide-induced organ damage. ACS Cent Sci. 2020;6(7):1199–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Meara CHO, Coupland LA, Kordbacheh F, Quah BJC, Chang CW, Simon Davis DA, Bezos A, Browne AM, Freeman C, Hammill DJ, et al. Neutralizing the pathological effects of extracellular histones with small polyanions. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Liao YE, Xu Y, Arnold K, Zhang F, Li J, Sellers R, Yin C, Pagadala V, Inman AM, Linhardt RJ, et al. Using heparan sulfate octadecasaccharide (18-mer) as a multi-target agent to protect against sepsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(4): e2209528120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Patel H. Blood biocompatibility enhancement of biomaterials by heparin immobilization: a review. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2021;32(4):237–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. He C, Ji H, Qian Y, Wang Q, Liu X, Zhao W, Zhao C. Heparin-based and heparin-inspired hydrogels: size-effect, gelation and biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(8):1186–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. François K, De Clerck D, Tonnelier A, Cambier ML, Orlando C, Jochmans K, Cools W, Wissing KM. Dialyzer performance during hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation using a heparin-grafted dialyzer combined with a citrate-enriched dialysate: results of the randomized crossover noninferiority evocit study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79(1):79-87.e71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Laville M, Dorval M, Fort Ros J, Fay R, Cridlig J, Nortier JL, Juillard L, Dębska-Ślizień A, Fernández Lorente L, Thibaudin D, et al. Results of the HepZero study comparing heparin-grafted membrane and standard care show that heparin-grafted dialyzer is safe and easy to use for heparin-free dialysis. Kidney Inter. 2014;86(6):1260–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Xu Y, Li Y, Zhao W, Zhao C. Simple emulsion template method towards self-anticoagulant and high-efficiency carboxymethyl chitosan-based adsorbent for low-density lipoprotein from whole blood. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;631:231–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Wang Y, Wang S, He X, Li Y, Xu T, Xu L, Yang B, Fan X, Zhao W, Zhao C. A breakthrough trial of an artificial liver without systemic heparinization in hyperbilirubinemia beagle models. Bioact Mater. 2023;20:651–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Li Y, Li J, Shi Z, Wang Y, Song X, Wang L, Han M, Du H, He C, Zhao W, et al. Anticoagulant chitosan-kappa-carrageenan composite hydrogel sorbent for simultaneous endotoxin and bacteria cleansing in septic blood. CarbohydrPolym. 2020;243: 116470.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Song X, Ji H, Li Y, Xiong Y, Qiu L, Zhong R, Tian M, Kizhakkedathu JN, Su B, Wei Q, et al. Transient blood thinning during extracorporeal blood purification via the inactivation of coagulation factors by hydrogel microspheres. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5(10):1143–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Lange SS, Mitchell DL, Vasquez KM. High mobility group protein B1 enhances DNA repair and chromatin modification after DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(30):10320–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Wu J, Ren J, Liu Q, Hu Q, Wu X, Wang G, Hong Z, Ren H, Li J. Effects of changes in the levels of damage-associated molecular patterns following continuous veno-venous hemofiltration therapy on outcomes in acute kidney injury patients with sepsis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Li X, Ye Y, Peng K, Zeng Z, Chen L, Zeng Y. Histones: the critical players in innate immunity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1030610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Ronco C, Chawla L, Husain-Syed F, Kellum JA. Rationale for sequential extracorporeal therapy (SET) in sepsis. Criti Care. 2023;27(1):50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially sponsored by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 2023NSFSC1531 and 2022YFS0147), the Med-X Innovation Programme of Med-X Center for Materials of Sichuan University (Grant No. MCM202101), the 1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence from West China Hospital of Sichuan University (Grant No. ZYJC21010) and Med + Biomaterial Institute of West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine of Sichuan University (Grant No. ZYME20001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Yupei Li, Tinghang Yang, Kaixi Chang, Ningyue Deng & Baihai Su

  2. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, College of Polymer Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Yu Chen & Weifeng Zhao

  3. Med-X Center for Materials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Weifeng Zhao & Baihai Su

  4. Med+ Biomaterial Institute of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Baihai Su

Authors
  1. Yupei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tinghang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaixi Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ningyue Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weifeng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Baihai Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors wrote, read and approved the original draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weifeng Zhao or Baihai Su.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, T. et al. Targeting circulating high mobility group box-1 and histones by extracorporeal blood purification as an immunomodulation strategy against critical illnesses. Crit Care 27, 77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04382-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04382-0

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535