Skip to main content

Risk factors and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: a propensity score matched analysis

Dear Editor

Mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may be at an increased risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Our aim was to describe the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes associated with VAP in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

In this single-center cohort study, all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, based on the detection of viral sequences by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, who needed mechanical ventilation (MV) between March 1, and April 30, 2020 were included. The local ethics committee approved this study and waived the need for informed consent due to the observational nature of the study. VAP was defined according to the current American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines criteria [1]. Differences between quantitative variables were assessed by Student t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Chi-square or Fisher´s exact tests were used to analyze categorical data. To determine which variables were independently associated with VAP, a logistic regression analysis was performed, including the variables with p < 0.1 in the univariate analysis. To assess the influence of VAP in outcomes and account for inter-group imbalances of baseline characteristics, we conducted a propensity score matching including those variables with p < 0.1 in the univariate analysis. In all cases, 1:1 matching without replacement was used with a caliper 0.2 standard deviation of logit of the propensity score and with the nearest neighbor method. In the matched cohorts, differences in the categorical variables were analyzed using McNemar’s test, and differences in continuous variables were determined using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed using the Stata Statistical Software 14 (StataCorp 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP) and R, version 3.6.3 (R project for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.org).

Of the 353 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the study period, 250 (70.8%) required invasive MV (Table 1). VAP occurred in 100 (40%) of the mechanically ventilated patients. Of these, 78 were confirmed by a positive quantitative culture and 22 were defined by clinical criteria and a purulent respiratory sample. Median time to the diagnosis of VAP was 13 (8–20) days, with only 11 developing VAP within the first 96 h of admission. Antibiotic treatment was adequate in 89% of the cases. Admission to an open ICU (contingency unit without physical barriers between patients) (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.04–3.33]; p = 0.037), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR 1.55; 95% CI [1.21–2.00]; p = 0.001), corticosteroid treatment (OR 3.26; 95% CI [1.78–5.97]; p < 0.001) and treatment with tocilizumab (OR 1.85; 95% CI [1.02–3.38]; p = 0.044) before VAP were independently associated with VAP development. After propensity score matching, VAP was associated with a longer duration of MV and ICU stay and higher ICU mortality (Table 2).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the unmatched cohort
Table 2 Differences in variables included in propensity score in the matched cohort

According to the results reported, VAP is a frequent complication among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients [2, 3] and strongly impacts outcomes. It has been reported that COVID-19 makes patients more prone to VAP, not entirely due to the increased duration of the MV [3]. Despite the 28-day mortality benefit observed with corticosteroid use [4, 5] and controversies regarding tocilizumab use [6], both treatments were initiated prior to VAP occurrence, and often prior to ICU admission, and are independently associated with a higher risk of VAP. Limitations of the present study include its observational nature, single-center setting, and the fact that the total dose of administered steroids was not recorded. However, our findings suggest that excessive immunosuppression associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs may facilitate VAP development in COVID-19 patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

CI:

Confidence interval

ICU:

Intensive care unit

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

OR:

Odds ratio

VAP:

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

References

  1. 1.

    Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Palmer LB, Napolitano LM, O’Grady NP, Bartlett JG, Carratalà J, et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(5):e61–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2020;1–14.

  3. 3.

    Maes M, Higginson E, Pereira-Dias J, Curran MD, Parmar S, Khokhar F, Cuchet-Lourenço D, Lux J, Sharma-Hajela S, Ravenhill B, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    RECOVERY Collaborative Group, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, Staplin N, Brightling C, Ustianowski A, Elmahi E, Prudon B, Green C, Felton T, Chadwick D, Rege K, Fegan C, Chappell LC, Faust SN, Jaki T, Jeffery K, Montgomery A, Rowan K, Juszczak E, Baillie JK, Haynes R, Landray MJ. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704.

  5. 5.

    Sterne JAC, Murthy S, Diaz JV, Slutsky AS, Villar J, Angus DC, Annane D, Azevedo LCP, Berwanger O, Cavalcanti AB, et al. Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically Ill patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;324(13):1330–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stone JH, Frigault MJ, Serling-Boyd NJ, Fernandes AD, Harvey L, Foulkes AS, Horick NK, Healy BC, Shah R, Bensaci AM, Woolley AE, Nikiforow S, Lin N, Sagar M, Schrager H, Huckins DS, Axelrod M, Pincus MD, Fleisher J, Sacks CA, Dougan M, North CM, Halvorsen YD, Thurber TK, Dagher Z, Scherer A, Wallwork RS, Kim AY, Schoenfeld S, Sen P, Neilan TG, Perugino CA, Unizony SH, Collier DS, Matza MA, Yinh JM, Bowman KA, Meyerowitz E, Zafar A, Drobni ZD, Bolster MB, Kohler M, D'Silva KM, Dau J, Lockwood MM, Cubbison C, Weber BN, Mansour MK; BACC Bay Tocilizumab Trial Investigators. Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(24):2333–2344.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MMM was responsible for the acquisition of the data and the initial draft. EPM, FXN, OR, and RF contributed substantially to the study design, data analysis, interpretation and the writing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricard Ferrer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The local ethics committee (CEIm [Comitè d’Ètica d’Investigació amb medicaments], Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain) approved this study and waived the need for informed consent due to the observational nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MMM declares that she has no competing interests. EPM declares that she has no competing interests. FXNC has received speaker fees from MSD, Pfizer, Shionogi, and Gilead outside the submitted work. OR has received research grants and speaker fees from Hamilton Medical outside the submitted work. RF has received speaker fees from MSD, Pfizer, Shionogi, and Gilead outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Martínez, M., Plata-Menchaca, E.P., Nuvials, F.X. et al. Risk factors and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: a propensity score matched analysis. Crit Care 25, 235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03654-x

Download citation