Skip to main content

The gut microbiome’s role in the development, maintenance, and outcomes of sepsis

Abstract

The gut microbiome regulates a number of homeostatic mechanisms in the healthy host including immune function and gut barrier protection. Loss of normal gut microbial structure and function has been associated with diseases as diverse as Clostridioides difficile infection, asthma, and epilepsy. Recent evidence has also demonstrated a link between the gut microbiome and sepsis. In this review, we focus on three key areas of the interaction between the gut microbiome and sepsis. First, prior to sepsis onset, gut microbiome alteration increases sepsis susceptibility through several mechanisms, including (a) allowing for expansion of pathogenic intestinal bacteria, (b) priming the immune system for a robust pro-inflammatory response, and (c) decreasing production of beneficial microbial products such as short-chain fatty acids. Second, once sepsis is established, gut microbiome disruption worsens and increases susceptibility to end-organ dysfunction. Third, there is limited evidence that microbiome-based therapeutics, including probiotics and selective digestive decontamination, may decrease sepsis risk and improve sepsis outcomes in select patient populations, but concerns about safety have limited uptake. Case reports of a different microbiome-based therapy, fecal microbiota transplantation, have shown correlation with gut microbial structure restoration and decreased inflammatory response, but these results require further validation. While much of the evidence linking the gut microbiome and sepsis has been established in pre-clinical studies, clinical evidence is lacking in many areas. To address this, we outline a potential research agenda for further investigating the interaction between the gut microbiome and sepsis.

Background

Sepsis, a dysregulated immune response to infection resulting in end-organ damage and potentially death, is a major public health threat [1]. Sepsis affects 1.7 million patients in the USA annually with mortality of up to 50% [2, 3]. Despite high incidence, morbidity, and mortality, there are few established treatments for sepsis. The mainstays of therapy—antibiotics and supportive care—have not changed significantly for decades.

The gut microbiome modulates several responses to sepsis and is a potential therapeutic target in sepsis [4]. Loss of normal gut microbiome structure and function has been implicated in several diseases including Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), inflammatory bowel disease, and obesity [5]. While the pathogenesis of sepsis is multifactorial and incompletely understood, there is increasing evidence that gut microbiome disruption predisposes to sepsis and negatively impact sepsis outcomes [6]. In this review, we highlight this evidence, review the use of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in sepsis, and outline research priorities for clarifying the role of the gut microbiome in sepsis. Although research into associations between the gut microbiome and sepsis has been increasing, differences in methods and outcome measures make comparisons across studies difficult. Table 1 provides an overview of important terminology for interpreting microbiome research and key terms used in this review.

Table 1 Glossary of key concepts for interpreting microbiome research

Gut microbiome disruption predisposes to sepsis

Although thought to be sterile in utero, the neonatal intestine is colonized at birth. Over the first several weeks of life, acquisition of phylogenetic diversity, especially with obligate anaerobes, protects from pathogen colonization [7, 8]. A 2019 prospective cohort study of over 200 preterm infants found that increased bacterial diversity and anaerobic bacterial colonization of the neonatal gut microbiome protects against sepsis [9]. Importantly, bacterial species that predominate in the absence of anaerobes, including Staphylococcus species and Escherichia coli, are those that translocate and cause bacteremia [7, 9, 10].

Less is known about gut microbiome changes that predispose adults to sepsis, but an early study demonstrated a pathogenic role of gut microbiome colonization and translocation in post-operative sepsis [11]. There are few studies that prospectively track gut microbiome changes prior to sepsis onset, and all have only been published as conference abstracts to date [12,13,14]. However, these preliminary studies indicate that patients with low gut microbiome diversity [12, 14] and high relative abundance of pathogenic gram negatives and enterococci [13] are at higher risk of sepsis. Other studies have shown similar risk factors for bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients [15, 16] and for infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients [17].

Two recent large epidemiologic studies provide circumstantial evidence that gut microbiome disruption is a risk factor for sepsis [18, 19]. Although neither of these studies specifically characterized the gut microbiomes of included patients, they examined the impact of CDI and broad-spectrum antibiotics on sepsis development. Because CDI and broad-spectrum antibiotics are closely linked with gut microbiome disruption, patients who had CDI or received broad-spectrum antibiotics should have more significant microbiome disruption than those who did not. The first, a 2015 study of over 10,000 Medicare recipients, examined the risk of sepsis after an episode of CDI [18]. In this cohort, patients were 70% more likely to develop severe sepsis after hospitalization for CDI than after hospitalization for an infectious cause other than CDI. The second study looked at risk of severe sepsis after receipt of different classes of antibiotics in over 12 million patients [19]. Patients who received antibiotics most associated with CDI (e.g., 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones) had 65% higher odds of readmission for severe sepsis or septic shock than patients who did not receive antibiotics. This association was attenuated in patients who received antibiotics less associated with CDI (e.g., 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporins and macrolides). These studies therefore suggest a strong correlation between gut microbiome disruption and subsequent sepsis development. Although the correlation may be strong, the mechanisms by which these microbiome changes affect sepsis risk, and potential confounders of this risk, were not evaluated in these studies and require clarification.

In addition to predisposing to sepsis, decreased gut microbiome diversity modulates host response to sepsis in animal models. In one experiment, genetically identical mice purchased from different vendors had compositionally distinct gut microbial communities (i.e., β-diversity) and different amounts of diversity (i.e., α-diversity). When subjected to experimental abdominal sepsis, mice with greater α-diversity were more likely to survive than those with lower α-diversity (47% vs. 10% 7-day survival). Co-housing mice led to equilibration of both α- and β-diversity between groups with resultant improved sepsis survival among mice previously more likely to die [20]. Similarly, the gut microbiomes of mice who survived sepsis were protective against sepsis when given to sepsis-susceptible mice via FMT [21]. Similar effects of microbiome depletion and loss of diversity on mortality have been shown in several experimental models of sepsis [22, 23], including models of influenza A and pneumococcal pneumonia [24, 25]. Potential mechanistic links between gut microbiome diversity and sepsis susceptibility are discussed in the next section.

Whether gut microbiome disruption prior to sepsis onset worsens sepsis outcomes in humans remains unknown. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined the impact of pre-treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics on outcomes in healthy young men given intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [26]. Although subjects randomized to broad-spectrum antibiotics had decreased α-diversity and lower abundance of several beneficial gut bacteria, there was no effect on surrogate markers of sepsis severity including vital signs and fibrinolysis [26]. As this study shows, gut microbiome composition and diversity are unlikely to account for all of the clinical heterogeneity seen in sepsis. The gut microbiome is likely one of many factors that regulate systemic sepsis response; more research is needed to clarify interactions between regulatory mechanisms.

Mechanisms of increased sepsis susceptibility

Selection for pathobionts

In the presence of protective commensal bacteria, bacteria with pathogenic potential that reside in the intestinal lumen of healthy hosts (“pathobionts”) may not be able to proliferate and cause disease [27]. Loss of protective bacterial taxa allows for pathobiont proliferation [28, 29]. In a key early study, when mice were exposed to colonic inflammation and antibiotics, the gut microbiome was characterized by expansion of a pathogenic clone of multi-drug resistant (MDR) E. coli, which disseminated systemically [30].

In a separate experiment, mice were fed a high- or normal-fat diet, given broad-spectrum antibiotics, and then subjected to partial hepatectomy. The high-fat diet mice had decreased gut microbiome α-diversity, were less able to survive partial hepatectomy, and had expansion of MDR gram-negative bacteria compared to mice fed a normal diet [31]. High-fat diet mice had higher mortality and more bacterial dissemination from the gut, demonstrating that decreased gut microbiome diversity can predispose to intestinal translocation even if the primary injury is remote.

Altered immune response

The microbiome’s influence on immune development begins with colonization of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract at birth [7, 32]. Germ-free neonatal mice have decreased development of bone marrow myeloid precursors and resultant decreased myeloid lineage cells in the spleen, rendering them susceptible to E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus sepsis [33, 34]. Intestinal re-colonization can reduce immunologic dysfunction that predisposes to increased sepsis susceptibility [34].

After intestinal colonization during the neonatal period, differences in gut microbiome composition direct differential immune responses to sepsis. Mice with increased gut microbiome α-diversity have improved sepsis survival, which is mediated by a distinct immunophenotype characterized by an increased CD4+ T cell response [20]. Enhancing microbiome α-diversity in mice by co-housing not only led to increased sepsis survival, but also changed the immune response to sepsis [20]. Mice who survived sepsis had improved outcomes when exposed to sepsis with similar bacteria as those that colonized their intestines, due to improved T cell response against those specific bacterial antigens [35]. In addition to impacting T cell responses, the gut microbiome also influences humoral immunity: commensal bacteria direct IgA production, which is protective in subsequent sepsis through bacterial homology [36]. These studies indicate a role for the gut microbiome in “priming” the immune system to respond to sepsis.

After sepsis onset, gut microbiome changes characterized by decreased abundance of gut commensals affect inflammatory responses. Animal studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding specific inflammatory pathways, reflecting the complexity of the relationship between the gut microbiome and the immune system. For example, in a mouse model of Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis, pre-treatment with oral antibiotics prior to sepsis onset was associated with lower levels of lung TNF-α, a pro-inflammatory cytokine [25], whereas others have shown the opposite effect of gut microbiome depletion on TNF-α [21, 22, 37,38,39]. Despite differences in specific cytokine expression between studies, the overall effect of alteration of normal gut microbiome structure prior to sepsis onset appears to be a more robust inflammatory response to sepsis [21, 22, 25, 37,38,39,40,41].

Differences in cytokine expression may be due to the effect of commensal bacteria on specific immune pathways. A study of 500 healthy adults demonstrated interactions between gut microbial commensal species and cytokine expression by correlating gut microbiome composition with cytokine response when peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated by microbial antigens ex vivo [42]. For example, the authors showed that the commensal bacteria Coprococcus comes influences production of cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 to modulate the acute inflammatory response to Candida albicans infection [42].

While important, ex vivo studies do not fully replicate conditions present during sepsis in humans. Outside of a few small studies, there is little human data on the gut microbiome’s impact on immune modulation in sepsis [26, 43,44,45,46]. One study did not find a relationship between the gut microbiome and immune response in experimentally induced sepsis [26], whereas other studies in clinical sepsis have shown a link between gut microbiome alterations characterized by an increase in pathobionts and an exuberant immune response [43,44,45]. Given the importance of immune dysregulation in sepsis pathogenesis [47], the gut microbiome’s role in immune response to sepsis deserves further study.

Decreased production of beneficial microbial products

Commensal members of the gut microbiome produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) which regulate several functions of the gut microenvironment [48]. For example, Clostridia and Faecalibacterium produce the SCFA butyrate, which influences colonic regulatory T cell differentiation through upregulation of Foxp3, a key regulatory T cell transcription factor [49], and inhibits histone deacetylation to decrease NF-κB-regulated pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6 [50].

In addition to their immune effects, SCFAs are crucial for epithelial cell function [51]. Acetate, produced by the gut commensal Bifidobacterium, protected mice from intestinal E. coli translocation through its effect on epithelial cell function [52]. Epithelial cell metabolism of butyrate decreases tissue oxygen concentration, thereby stabilizing HIF-1, a transcription factor that regulates several genes important for barrier function [53]. Preliminary data indicate that lower abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria may be a risk factor for sepsis onset [12], and increased gut membrane permeability is one plausible explanation that requires validation. For example, elevated serum markers of gut permeability including zonulin and FABP2 are associated with a gut microbiome with predominant gram negatives [54], but if these markers are elevated prior to sepsis onset in association with microbiome disruption is unknown.

Sepsis worsens gut microbiome disruption

As described above, alterations in the gut microbiome can predispose to sepsis by allowing for proliferation of pathobionts, promoting a dysregulated immune response, and decreasing production of beneficial SCFAs. Gut microbiome changes not only affect outcomes prior to sepsis onset: after sepsis onset, alterations in normal gut microbiome structure can worsen and contribute to worse outcomes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Conceptual illustration of the pathway between gut microbiome disruption and sepsis. Gut microbiome alteration predisposes to selection for pathobionts (potentially pathogenic bacteria that can reside in the gut microbiome), immune dysregulation, and decreased production of short-chain fatty acids, beneficial products produced by the gut microbiome. These changes can lower the threshold for sepsis development. Sepsis and treatment with antibiotics can drive worsening microbiome disruption in a vicious cycle, contributing to ongoing end-organ dysfunction. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; FMT, fecal microbiota transplant; MDRO, multi-drug resistant organism; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid

The mechanisms underlying sepsis-driven gut microbiome changes are unclear. Antibiotics are a major driver of sepsis-related microbiome alteration [55]. However, opioids [56], parenteral nutrition [57], and proton-pump inhibitors [58] also have an effect. Clearly, the benefits of these interventions likely outweigh their deleterious microbiome impacts. An understanding of the impact of critical illness and associated interventions on the gut microbiome is necessary to inform research to limit these adverse effects.

Several prospective cohort studies have identified an association between decreased gut microbiome diversity in sepsis and higher relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria including aerobic gram negatives [39, 46, 56, 59,60,61]. The earliest study to examine microbiome changes in critically ill patients showed that patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) had lower abundance of obligate anaerobes, and their gut microbiomes were enriched with potential pathogens such as Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas [46]. As expected, a significant number of these patients were being treated with antibiotics, which confounded the relationship between sepsis and observed microbiome changes.

Early studies relied on culture-based techniques for determination of microbiome composition (Table 1). With increasing use of culture-independent techniques including 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and metagenomic next-generation sequencing, recent studies have detected small changes in abundance of difficult-to-culture bacterial commensals that may impact sepsis outcomes. For example, Faecalibacterium, which is associated with pathways that decrease intestinal inflammation, generally occupies a small niche in the gut microbiome and is wiped out during sepsis [59, 60]. The disappearance of Faecalibacterium and other commensals allows hospital-acquired pathogens such as Enterococcus to colonize the intestinal microbiome during sepsis [62]. In turn, the intestinal microbiome acts as a reservoir for MDR organisms [28, 56]. These colonizing pathogens may disseminate and cause bacteremia later in the course of sepsis [46, 63].

In addition to allowing domination by organisms with significant pathogenic potential, alterations in microbiome function worsen detrimental changes seen prior to sepsis onset. For example, patients with sepsis have fewer fecal SCFAs [46, 64], which may worsen gut epithelial integrity and immune dysfunction seen in sepsis [4, 47]. No studies have tracked longitudinal microbiome changes in sepsis survivors after discharge from the hospital to determine how long these microbiome changes persist. However, preliminary studies indicate that decreased SCFA concentrations last through at least 6 weeks of hospitalization, corresponding with persistent pathobiont colonization [64].

Gut microbiome and end-organ damage in sepsis

Sepsis affects end-organ damage through several mechanisms, including alterations in gut microbiome structure and function. Gut microbiome-derived SCFAs protected against acute kidney injury (AKI) in a mouse model of sepsis [65] and a specific gut microbiome composition decreased liver injury in a separate experiment [21]. Fascinatingly, the gut microbiome appears to impact delirium not only indirectly via inflammatory pathways, but also by bacterial translocation to the brains of septic patients with gut-derived bacteria [41, 44]. In an animal experiment on sepsis-induced delirium, mice with sepsis had decreased microbiome diversity and more severe neurocognitive damage, including more seizures, and FMT lessened the detrimental neurologic impact [41].

A relationship between the gut and lung microbiome has been established by several key studies but still needs to be translated to patients with sepsis. In one study, the lung microbiome of mice with non-pulmonary sepsis was enriched with gut bacteria, including Enterococcus, even though the mice did not have clinical bacteremia or pneumonia [66]. Importantly, this was true whether sepsis was induced via an intestinal puncture model or through systemic LPS injection, indicating that systemic inflammation was sufficient to affect end-organ function and microbiome composition.

In humans, patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have significantly higher abundance of enteric bacteria in their lung microbiomes than do healthy controls, and this correlates with higher markers of systemic inflammation [66]. Although not specific to sepsis, gut microbiome changes in hematopoietic stem cell recipients precipitated pulmonary complications, and in one patient, intestinal expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae closely predated K. pneumoniae pneumonia [67]. One plausible explanation for this is the “gut-lymph theory,” by which increased intestinal permeability leads to bacterial translocation to lymphatics and ultimately the pulmonary circulation via the thoracic duct [68].

Despite increasing evidence that the gut microbiome affects end-organ damage in non-human studies and in diseases other than sepsis, only one small study in humans has looked at whether gut microbiome features (including decreased diversity and changes in composition) are associated with end-organ dysfunction in sepsis, including AKI and ARDS, and did not identify an effect on these outcomes [59]. Gut microbiome composition with fewer total obligate anaerobes [63] and abundant Enterococcus [17] at sepsis onset have been associated with mortality, whereas other studies have shown that microbiome diversity does not appear to be associated with mortality in sepsis [17, 59, 61]. In some of these studies, not all patients had sepsis, and sepsis patients were not analyzed as a subset [17, 59, 61]. Further studies designed to specifically track adverse outcomes in sepsis are needed to characterize the impact of gut microbiome changes, both composition and diversity, on sepsis outcomes.

Microbiome-based therapeutics

Selective digestive decontamination, probiotics and synbiotics

The past 30 years have seen increasing interest in targeting the gut microbiome to improve outcomes of critically ill patients. One microbiome-related approach to preventing sepsis from MDR bacteria has involved “selective” oral or digestive decontamination using oral or parenteral antimicrobials with theoretical activity against many resistant healthcare-associated pathogens [69, 70]. Although some data do not show significant long-term effects of these strategies [71], concern for re-colonization with MDR bacteria soon after treatment discontinuation and undesired selection for even more resistant organisms in the microbiome has limited uptake of selective oral and digestive decontamination [70, 72].

Probiotics, i.e., bacteria associated with potential beneficial properties, are perhaps the most studied microbiome-based intervention to prevent sepsis and improve sepsis outcomes. A 2017 RCT of over 4500 healthy newborns in rural India found that a synbiotic (i.e., a probiotic combined with a non-digestible compound that the probiotic requires for metabolism), in this case, Lactobacillus plantarum and fructooligosaccharide, reduced neonatal sepsis or death by 40% [73]. Whether these results are generalizable to regions with fewer nutritional deficiencies or infants at higher risk is uncertain.

Furthermore, the effect of specific probiotic species and strategies to ensure probiotic colonization require investigation. A RCT of the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve as prophylaxis in over 1000 very preterm infants at high risk of sepsis did not demonstrate reduction in sepsis incidence or mortality compared to placebo [74]. A sub-analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing showed that probiotic administration was not associated with microbiome composition or α-diversity, and only 70% of infants who received the probiotic were colonized with Bifidobacterium breve, indicating that probiotic administration alone is not sufficient for colonization and subsequent beneficial effects [75]. The effect of probiotics also may be specific to the formulation studied. Because formulations vary, this may decrease the overall signal for probiotic efficacy.

Studies of probiotics in critically ill adults have shown similarly mixed results, but a meta-analysis of probiotics for infection prophylaxis in critically ill patients demonstrated an association between probiotics and reduction in infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia [76]. The included trials were heterogeneous with respect to inclusion criteria and probiotic species used and only a subset specifically included patients with sepsis. Concurrent broad-spectrum antibiotic use in patients with sepsis may limit probiotic colonization and beneficial effects. Furthermore, concerns over probiotic-associated bacteremia, as demonstrated in a recent genomic study [77], have given clinicians pause.

Previous studies have focused largely on probiotics containing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, but several other next-generation probiotic species appear promising in pre-clinical studies. Akkermansia, for example, is associated with increased sepsis survival in mice [37]; in a separate study, Akkermansia directed T cell differentiation [78], providing one mechanism by which Akkermansia may improve sepsis outcomes. Probiotic “consortia,” i.e., groups of probiotics, can theoretically be manufactured to achieve specific synergistic effects. For example, one probiotic consortium degraded ampicillin and decreased colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in antibiotic-treated mice [79]; it is plausible that this could decrease subsequent VRE bacteremia. More mechanistic studies are needed to determine the impact of specific next-generation probiotic species and consortia prior to translating these findings into probiotics for patients with or at risk of sepsis.

Fecal microbiota transplant

While probiotics and synbiotics contain only one or a small number of bacterial species, FMT potentially allows for colonization of an entire donor gut microbiome in a recipient. Therefore, FMT may allow for more robust microbiome reconstitution and impact sepsis outcomes through several mechanisms including SCFA production and immune regulation.

There are five case reports of FMT for non-CDI sepsis [43, 80,81,82] (Table 2). These reports vary in quality, as some do not specify the suspected cause of sepsis [43, 80, 82]. Prior to FMT receipt, these patients suffered from prolonged ICU admissions with complications including bacteremia, MDR bacterial infection, respiratory failure, and organ dysfunction. Notably, many of the cases had prolonged hemodynamic compromise despite not having a specific defined infection for up to weeks prior to FMT [43, 80, 82]. This may indicate a prolonged immune-dysregulated state associated with sepsis and its numerous consequences.

Table 2 Published case reports on the use of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) to treat sepsis (other than sepsis secondary to Clostridioides difficile infection)

In four of five cases, FMT was temporally associated with improved organ function, resolution of sepsis, and survival [43, 80, 82]. Prior to FMT, the patients that survived had gut microbiomes characterized by abundance of hospital-associated pathogenic bacteria. After FMT, the patients’ microbiomes were similar to those of their stool donors and had higher abundance of commensal bacteria [43, 80, 82]. In one case, FMT correlated with lower systemic levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, although the direct impact of FMT remains uncertain [43].

Although these case reports are intriguing, FMT for sepsis is clearly preliminary. Research to identify patients who may benefit and effect on patient-centered outcomes could inform its utility in broader application for sepsis. Additionally, multiple recent reports of E. coli infections acquired via FMT, including several resulting in death, highlight the need for careful donor screening, especially in patients with significant medical comorbidities [83, 84].

Conclusions and future directions

Gut microbiome disruption appears to be a risk factor for sepsis and subsequent organ dysfunction. The gut microbiome affects host susceptibility and response to sepsis through a number of pathways. Specifically, fewer beneficial taxa allow for pathobiont colonization and alter host immune response and SCFA production. A direct link between abnormal gut microbiome development and sepsis risk has been established in neonates. However, there are several aspects of the relationship between the gut microbiome and sepsis that require further study (Table 3). In adults, there is evidence of a correlation between gut microbiome alteration and sepsis risk; however, the potential confounders require further investigation. Once sepsis develops, the gut microbiome appears to effect end-organ dysfunction including ARDS and delirium, although mechanisms require further validation. Lastly, strategies to alter the gut microbiome, including FMT, either prior to sepsis onset or during the course of sepsis may be beneficial for selected patients with significant change in microbiome structure and function. Before further uptake of FMT in sepsis, several factors including patient selection, timing, and optimal route of administration require further research. Hopefully, improved mechanistic insights into the interaction between the gut microbiome and sepsis will allow for development of novel microbiome-based therapeutics to mitigate sepsis morbidity and mortality.

Table 3 Proposed research priorities for study of the interaction between the gut microbiome and sepsis

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

CDI:

Clostridioides difficile infection

FMT:

Fecal microbiota transplant

ICU:

Intensive care unit

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

MDR:

Multi-drug resistant

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

rRNA:

Ribosomal RNA [ribonucleic acid]

SCFA:

Short-chain fatty acid

SIRS:

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

VRE:

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus

References

  1. 1.

    Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, Murphy DJ, Seymour CW, Iwashyna TJ, Kadri SS, Angus DC, Danner RL, Fiore AE, et al. Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009-2014. JAMA. 2017;318(13):1241–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kadri SS, Rhee C, Strich JR, Morales MK, Hohmann S, Menchaca J, Suffredini AF, Danner RL, Klompas M. Estimating ten-year trends in septic shock incidence and mortality in United States academic medical centers using clinical data. Chest. 2017;151(2):278–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Klingensmith NJ, Coopersmith CM. The gut as the motor of multiple organ dysfunction in critical illness. Crit Care Clin. 2016;32(2):203–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shreiner AB, Kao JY, Young VB. The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31(1):69–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Haak BW, Wiersinga WJ. The role of the gut microbiota in sepsis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(2):135–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shaw AG, Sim K, Randell P, Cox MJ, McClure ZE, Li MS, Donaldson H, Langford PR, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, et al. Late-onset bloodstream infection and perturbed maturation of the gastrointestinal microbiota in premature infants. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132923.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Singer JR, Blosser EG, Zindl CL, Silberger DJ, Conlan S, Laufer VA, DiToro D, Deming C, Kumar R, Morrow CD, et al. Preventing dysbiosis of the neonatal mouse intestinal microbiome protects against late-onset sepsis. Nat Med. 2019;25(11):1772-1782.

  9. 9.

    Graspeuntner S, Waschina S, Kunzel S, Twisselmann N, Rausch TK, Cloppenborg-Schmidt K, Zimmermann J, Viemann D, Herting E, Gopel W, et al. Gut dysbiosis with bacilli dominance and accumulation of fermentation products precedes late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(2):268–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Carl MA, Ndao IM, Springman AC, Manning SD, Johnson JR, Johnston BD, Burnham CA, Weinstock ES, Weinstock GM, Wylie TN, et al. Sepsis from the gut: the enteric habitat of bacteria that cause late-onset neonatal bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(9):1211–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    MacFie J, O'Boyle C, Mitchell CJ, Buckley PM, Johnstone D, Sudworth P. Gut origin of sepsis: a prospective study investigating associations between bacterial translocation, gastric microflora, and septic morbidity. Gut. 1999;45(2):223–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Patel A, Seekatz AM, Bassis CM, Henig O, Albin R, Woods K, Rao K, Bachman MA: Specific gut microbiome features are associated with sepsis. In: ASM Microbe 2019. San Francisco; 2019. http://www.bstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/7859/presentation/17151.

  13. 13.

    Sun Y, Patel A, Seekatz A, Bassis C, Rao K, Bachman MA: Total rectal bacterial abundance is associated with Enterobacteriaceae infections and all-cause sepsis. In: ASM Microbe 2019. San Francisco; 2019. http://www.bstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/7859/presentation/17151.

  14. 14.

    Adhi FI, Littmann ER, Taur Y, Maloy MA, Markey KA, Fontana E, Amoretti LA, Wright R, Sanchez-Escamilla M, Castillo Flores N, et al. Pre-transplant fecal microbial diversity independently predicts critical illness after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2019;134:3264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Taur Y, Xavier JB, Lipuma L, Ubeda C, Goldberg J, Gobourne A, Lee YJ, Dubin KA, Socci ND, Viale A, et al. Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(7):905–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tamburini FB, Andermann TM, Tkachenko E, Senchyna F, Banaei N, Bhatt AS. Precision identification of diverse bloodstream pathogens in the gut microbiome. Nat Med. 2018;24(12):1809–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Freedberg DE, Zhou MJ, Cohen ME, Annavajhala MK, Khan S, Moscoso DI, Brooks C, Whittier S, Chong DH, Uhlemann AC, et al. Pathogen colonization of the gastrointestinal microbiome at intensive care unit admission and risk for subsequent death or infection. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(8):1203–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Prescott HC, Dickson RP, Rogers MA, Langa KM, Iwashyna TJ. Hospitalization type and subsequent severe sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(5):581–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Baggs J, Jernigan JA, Halpin AL, Epstein L, Hatfield KM, McDonald LC. Risk of subsequent sepsis within 90 days after a hospital stay by type of antibiotic exposure. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(7):1004–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fay KT, Klingensmith NJ, Chen CW, Zhang W, Sun Y, Morrow KN, Liang Z, Burd EM, Ford ML, Coopersmith CM. The gut microbiome alters immunophenotype and survival from sepsis. FASEB J. 2019;33(10):11258-11269.

  21. 21.

    Gong S, Yan Z, Liu Z, Niu M, Fang H, Li N, Huang C, Li L, Chen G, Luo H, et al. Intestinal microbiota mediates the susceptibility to polymicrobial sepsis-induced liver injury by Granisetron generation in mice. Hepatology. 2019;69(4):1751–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Panpetch W, Somboonna N, Bulan DE, Issara-Amphorn J, Worasilchai N, Finkelman M, Chindamporn A, Palaga T, Tumwasorn S, Leelahavanichkul A. Gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans increases serum (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan, without Candidemia, and worsens cecal ligation and puncture sepsis in murine model. Shock. 2018;49(1):62–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chen G, Huang B, Fu S, Li B, Ran X, He D, Jiang L, Li Y, Liu B, Xie L, et al. G protein-coupled receptor 109A and host microbiota modulate intestinal epithelial integrity during sepsis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2079.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ichinohe T, Pang IK, Kumamoto Y, Peaper DR, Ho JH, Murray TS, Iwasaki A. Microbiota regulates immune defense against respiratory tract influenza a virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(13):5354–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schuijt TJ, Lankelma JM, Scicluna BP, de Sousa e Melo F, Roelofs JJ, de Boer JD, Hoogendijk AJ, de Beer R, de Vos A, Belzer C, et al. The gut microbiota plays a protective role in the host defence against pneumococcal pneumonia. Gut 2016, 65(4):575–583.

  26. 26.

    Lankelma JM, Cranendonk DR, Belzer C, de Vos AF, de Vos WM, van der Poll T, Wiersinga WJ. Antibiotic-induced gut microbiota disruption during human endotoxemia: a randomised controlled study. Gut. 2017;66(9):1623–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chow J, Tang H, Mazmanian SK. Pathobionts of the gastrointestinal microbiota and inflammatory disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23(4):473–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Woodworth MH, Hayden MK, Young VB, Kwon JH. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation in reducing intestinal colonization with antibiotic resistant organisms: the current landscape and future directions. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(7):ofz288.

  29. 29.

    Kim SG, Becattini S, Moody TU, Shliaha PV, Littmann ER, Seok R, Gjonbalaj M, Eaton V, Fontana E, Amoretti L, et al. Microbiota-derived lantibiotic restores resistance against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Nature. 2019;572(7771):665–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ayres JS, Trinidad NJ, Vance RE. Lethal inflammasome activation by a multidrug-resistant pathobiont upon antibiotic disruption of the microbiota. Nat Med. 2012;18(5):799–806.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hyoju SK, Zaborin A, Keskey R, Sharma A, Arnold W, van den Berg F, Kim SM, Gottel N, Bethel C, Charnot-Katsikas A, et al. Mice fed an obesogenic western diet, administered antibiotics, and subjected to a sterile surgical procedure develop lethal septicemia with multidrug-resistant pathobionts. MBio. 2019;10(4):e00903-19.

  32. 32.

    Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157(1):121–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Deshmukh HS, Liu Y, Menkiti OR, Mei J, Dai N, O'Leary CE, Oliver PM, Kolls JK, Weiser JN, Worthen GS. The microbiota regulates neutrophil homeostasis and host resistance to Escherichia coli K1 sepsis in neonatal mice. Nat Med. 2014;20(5):524–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Khosravi A, Yanez A, Price JG, Chow A, Merad M, Goodridge HS, Mazmanian SK. Gut microbiota promote hematopoiesis to control bacterial infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(3):374–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cabrera-Perez J, Babcock JC, Dileepan T, Murphy KA, Kucaba TA, Badovinac VP, Griffith TS. Gut microbial membership modulates CD4 T cell reconstitution and function after sepsis. J Immunol. 2016;197(5):1692–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wilmore JR, Gaudette BT, Gomez Atria D, Hashemi T, Jones DD, Gardner CA, Cole SD, Misic AM, Beiting DP, Allman D. Commensal microbes induce serum IgA responses that protect against polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(3):302–11 e303.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Morowitz MJ, Di Caro V, Pang D, Cummings J, Firek B, Rogers MB, Ranganathan S, Clark RSB, Aneja RK. Dietary supplementation with nonfermentable fiber alters the gut microbiota and confers protection in murine models of sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(5):e516–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ikeda M, Shimizu K, Ogura H, Kurakawa T, Umemoto E, Motooka D, Nakamura S, Ichimaru N, Takeda K, Takahara S, et al. Hydrogen-rich saline regulates intestinal barrier dysfunction, dysbiosis, and bacterial translocation in a murine model of sepsis. Shock. 2018;50(6):640–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Liu Z, Li N, Fang H, Chen X, Guo Y, Gong S, Niu M, Zhou H, Jiang Y, Chang P, et al. Enteric dysbiosis is associated with sepsis in patients. FASEB J. 2019;33(11):12299-12310.

  40. 40.

    Kim D, Kang H. Exercise training modifies gut microbiota with attenuated host responses to sepsis in wild-type mice. FASEB J. 2019;33(4):5772–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li S, Lv J, Li J, Zhao Z, Guo H, Zhang Y, Cheng S, Sun J, Pan H, Fan S, et al. Intestinal microbiota impact sepsis associated encephalopathy via the vagus nerve. Neurosci Lett. 2018;662:98–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schirmer M, Smeekens SP, Vlamakis H, Jaeger M, Oosting M, Franzosa EA, Ter Horst R, Jansen T, Jacobs L, Bonder MJ, et al. Linking the human gut microbiome to inflammatory cytokine production capacity. Cell. 2016;167(4):1125–36 e1128.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li Q, Wang C, Tang C, He Q, Zhao X, Li N, Li J. Successful treatment of severe sepsis and diarrhea after vagotomy utilizing fecal microbiota transplantation: a case report. Crit Care. 2015;19:37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Singer BH, Dickson RP, Denstaedt SJ, Newstead MW, Kim K, Falkowski NR, Erb-Downward JR, Schmidt TM, Huffnagle GB, Standiford TJ. Bacterial dissemination to the brain in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(6):747–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cernada M, Bauerl C, Serna E, Collado MC, Martinez GP, Vento M. Sepsis in preterm infants causes alterations in mucosal gene expression and microbiota profiles compared to non-septic twins. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25497.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Shimizu K, Ogura H, Goto M, Asahara T, Nomoto K, Morotomi M, Yoshiya K, Matsushima A, Sumi Y, Kuwagata Y, et al. Altered gut flora and environment in patients with severe SIRS. J Trauma. 2006;60(1):126–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(3):260–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Macfarlane S, Macfarlane GT. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62(1):67–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, Endo TA, Nakato G, Takahashi D, Nakanishi Y, Uetake C, Kato K, Kato T, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013;504(7480):446–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Parada Venegas D, De la Fuente MK, Landskron G, Gonzalez MJ, Quera R, Dijkstra G, Harmsen HJM, Faber KN, Hermoso MA. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:277.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhao Y, Chen F, Wu W, Sun M, Bilotta AJ, Yao S, Xiao Y, Huang X, Eaves-Pyles TD, Golovko G, et al. GPR43 mediates microbiota metabolite SCFA regulation of antimicrobial peptide expression in intestinal epithelial cells via activation of mTOR and STAT3. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11(3):752–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Fukuda S, Toh H, Hase K, Oshima K, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, Tobe T, Clarke JM, Topping DL, Suzuki T, et al. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature. 2011;469(7331):543–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kelly CJ, Zheng L, Campbell EL, Saeedi B, Scholz CC, Bayless AJ, Wilson KE, Glover LE, Kominsky DJ, Magnuson A, et al. Crosstalk between microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids and intestinal epithelial HIF augments tissue barrier function. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):662–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Stevens BR, Goel R, Seungbum K, Richards EM, Holbert RC, Pepine CJ, Raizada MK. Increased human intestinal barrier permeability plasma biomarkers zonulin and FABP2 correlated with plasma LPS and altered gut microbiome in anxiety or depression. Gut. 2018;67(8):1555–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Slimings C, Riley TV. Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: update of systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(4):881–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Zaborin A, Smith D, Garfield K, Quensen J, Shakhsheer B, Kade M, Tirrell M, Tiedje J, Gilbert JA, Zaborina O, et al. Membership and behavior of ultra-low-diversity pathogen communities present in the gut of humans during prolonged critical illness. MBio. 2014;5(5):e01361–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Dahlgren AF, Pan A, Lam V, Gouthro KC, Simpson PM, Salzman NH, Nghiem-Rao TH. Longitudinal changes in the gut microbiome of infants on total parenteral nutrition. Pediatr Res. 2019;86(1):107–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Imhann F, Bonder MJ, Vich Vila A, Fu J, Mujagic Z, Vork L, Tigchelaar EF, Jankipersadsing SA, Cenit MC, Harmsen HJ, et al. Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut. 2016;65(5):740–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lankelma JM, van Vught LA, Belzer C, Schultz MJ, van der Poll T, de Vos WM, Wiersinga WJ. Critically ill patients demonstrate large interpersonal variation in intestinal microbiota dysregulation: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(1):59–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    McDonald D, Ackermann G, Khailova L, Baird C, Heyland D, Kozar R, Lemieux M, Derenski K, King J, Vis-Kampen C, et al. Extreme Dysbiosis of the Microbiome in Critical Illness. mSphere. 2016;1(4):e00199-16.

  61. 61.

    Wan YD, Zhu RX, Wu ZQ, Lyu SY, Zhao LX, Du ZJ, Pan XT. Gut microbiota disruption in septic shock patients: a pilot study. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:8639–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ravi A, Halstead FD, Bamford A, Casey A, Thomson NM, van Schaik W, Snelson C, Goulden R, Foster-Nyarko E, Savva GM, et al. Loss of microbial diversity and pathogen domination of the gut microbiota in critically ill patients. Microb Genom. 2019;5(9):e000293.

  63. 63.

    Shimizu K, Ogura H, Hamasaki T, Goto M, Tasaki O, Asahara T, Nomoto K, Morotomi M, Matsushima A, Kuwagata Y, et al. Altered gut flora are associated with septic complications and death in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(4):1171–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yamada T, Shimizu K, Ogura H, Asahara T, Nomoto K, Yamakawa K, Hamasaki T, Nakahori Y, Ohnishi M, Kuwagata Y, et al. Rapid and sustained long-term decrease of fecal short-chain fatty acids in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;39(5):569–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Al-Harbi NO, Nadeem A, Ahmad SF, Alotaibi MR, AlAsmari AF, Alanazi WA, Al-Harbi MM, El-Sherbeeny AM, Ibrahim KE. Short chain fatty acid, acetate ameliorates sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by inhibition of NADPH oxidase signaling in T cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;58:24–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Dickson RP, Singer BH, Newstead MW, Falkowski NR, Erb-Downward JR, Standiford TJ, Huffnagle GB. Enrichment of the lung microbiome with gut bacteria in sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(10):16113.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Harris B, Morjaria SM, Littmann ER, Geyer AI, Stover DE, Barker JN, Giralt SA, Taur Y, Pamer EG. Gut microbiota predict pulmonary infiltrates after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(4):450–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Samuelson DR, Welsh DA, Shellito JE. Regulation of lung immunity and host defense by the intestinal microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1085.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    de Smet AM, Kluytmans JA, Cooper BS, Mascini EM, Benus RF, van der Werf TS, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P, Bogaers-Hofman D, van der Meer NJ, et al. Decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in ICU patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(1):20–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Huttner B, Haustein T, Uckay I, Renzi G, Stewardson A, Schaerrer D, Agostinho A, Andremont A, Schrenzel J, Pittet D, et al. Decolonization of intestinal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae with oral colistin and neomycin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(10):2375–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    de Jonge E, de Wilde RBP, Juffermans NP, Oostdijk EAN, Bernards AT, van Essen EHR, Kuijper EJ, Visser CE, Kesecioglu J, Bonten MJM. Carriage of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria after discontinuation of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) or selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD). Crit Care. 2018;22(1):243.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Oostdijk EA, de Smet AM, Blok HE, Thieme Groen ES, van Asselt GJ, Benus RF, Bernards SA, Frenay IH, Jansz AR, de Jongh BM, et al. Ecological effects of selective decontamination on resistant gram-negative bacterial colonization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(5):452–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Panigrahi P, Parida S, Nanda NC, Satpathy R, Pradhan L, Chandel DS, Baccaglini L, Mohapatra A, Mohapatra SS, Misra PR, et al. A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India. Nature. 2017;548(7668):407–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Costeloe K, Hardy P, Juszczak E, Wilks M, Millar MR. Probiotics in preterm infants study collaborative G: Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in very preterm infants: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):649–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Millar M, Seale J, Greenland M, Hardy P, Juszczak E, Wilks M, Panton N, Costeloe K, Wade WG. The microbiome of infants recruited to a randomised placebo-controlled probiotic trial (PiPS trial). EBioMedicine. 2017;20:255–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Manzanares W, Lemieux M, Langlois PL, Wischmeyer PE. Probiotic and synbiotic therapy in critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2016;19:262.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Yelin I, Flett KB, Merakou C, Mehrotra P, Stam J, Snesrud E, Hinkle M, Lesho E, McGann P, McAdam AJ, et al. Genomic and epidemiological evidence of bacterial transmission from probiotic capsule to blood in ICU patients. Nat Med. 2019.

  78. 78.

    Ansaldo E, Slayden LC, Ching KL, Koch MA, Wolf NK, Plichta DR, Brown EM, Graham DB, Xavier RJ, Moon JJ, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila induces intestinal adaptive immune responses during homeostasis. Science. 2019;364(6446):1179–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Caballero S, Kim S, Carter RA, Leiner IM, Susac B, Miller L, Kim GJ, Ling L, Pamer EG. Cooperating commensals restore colonization resistance to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21(5):592–602 e594.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Li Q, Wang C, Tang C, He Q, Zhao X, Li N, Li J. Therapeutic modulation and reestablishment of the intestinal microbiota with fecal microbiota transplantation resolves sepsis and diarrhea in a patient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(11):1832–4.

  81. 81.

    Gopalsamy SN, Sherman A, Woodworth MH, Lutgring JD, Kraft CS. Fecal microbiota transplant for multidrug-resistant organism decolonization administered during septic shock. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39(4):490–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Wei Y, Yang J, Wang J, Yang Y, Huang J, Gong H, Cui H, Chen D. Successful treatment with fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and diarrhea following severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):332.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    DeFilipp Z, Bloom PP, Torres Soto M, Mansour MK, Sater MRA, Huntley MH, Turbett S, Chung RT, Chen YB, Hohmann EL. Drug-resistant E. coli bacteremia transmitted by fecal microbiota transplant. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2043-050.

  84. 84.

    U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Safety alert regarding use of fecal microbiota for transplantation and risk of serious adverse events likely due to transmission of pathogenic organisms [https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/safety-alert-regarding-use-fecal-microbiota-transplantation-and-risk-serious-adverse-events-likely]. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

JAK is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research under award number K08 HS-025240. CL is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number K23HL138461-01A1. GSM is supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH under award number UL1 TR-002378. MHW is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH under award number K23AI144036. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors drafted or revised this work and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max W. Adelman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

JAK has served as a consultant to Grifols, Inc. CSK is on the scientific advisory board of Rebiotix.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adelman, M.W., Woodworth, M.H., Langelier, C. et al. The gut microbiome’s role in the development, maintenance, and outcomes of sepsis. Crit Care 24, 278 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02989-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sepsis, Gut microbiome, Review, Probiotics, Fecal microbiota transplant