Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

The ELSO Maastricht Treaty for ECLS Nomenclature: abbreviations for cannulation configuration in extracorporeal life support - a position paper of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization

  • 1, 2, 20Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 3, 20,
  • 4,
  • 5, 20,
  • 6, 20,
  • 7, 20,
  • 8, 20,
  • 9,
  • 10,
  • 11,
  • 12,
  • 13,
  • 14,
  • 15,
  • 16,
  • 17,
  • 18 and
  • 19
Critical Care201923:36

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2334-8

  • Received: 12 June 2018
  • Accepted: 23 January 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Maastricht Treaty for Nomenclature in Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) established consensus nomenclature and abbreviations for ECLS to ensure accurate, concise communication.

Methods

We build on this consensus nomenclature by layering a framework of precise and efficient abbreviations for cannula configuration that describe flow direction, number of cannulae used, any additional ECLS-related catheters, and cannulation sites. This work is a consensus of international representatives of the ELSO, including those from the North American, Latin American, European, South and West Asian, and Asian-Pacific chapters of ELSO.

Results

The classification increases in descriptive capability by introducing a third (cannula tip position) and fourth (cannula dimension) level to those provided in the previous consensus on ECLS cannulation configuration nomenclature. This expansion offers the simplest level needed to convey cannulation information yet allows for more details when required.

Conclusions

A complete nomenclature for ECLS cannulation configurations accommodating future revisions was developed to facilitate ability to compare practices and results, to promote efficient communication, and to improve quality of registry data.

Keywords

  • Extracorporeal life support
  • Membrane oxygenation
  • Nomenclature
  • Abbreviation
  • Configuration
  • Cannula
  • ELSO

Background

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Maastricht Treaty for Nomenclature in Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) was recently published [1] as a consensus among several stakeholders for the nomenclature and abbreviations in ECLS to ensure accurate, concise communication. Through this effort, a flexible and modifiable format was established that describes current ECLS cannulation configurations but is also adaptable for anticipated future revisions.

ECLS is defined as a set of therapies that focus on oxygenation, carbon dioxide removal, cardiac support, or a combination thereof [1]. Cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiothoracic or vascular surgery is excluded from this definition. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is one ECLS entity used for temporary support of patients with respiratory and/or cardiac failure. Recent research and development have transformed ECLS, which is now being delivered at increasing frequency to patients around the world [27]. The global diversity of approaches to temporary support with ECLS necessitated the consistent nomenclature that was recently released by the ELSO (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) [1] to benefit clinical and research practices. One of the first steps in creating the nomenclature was to separate mode from cannula configuration. The mode comprehensively describes the type of organ support delivered, whereas the configuration describes where the cannulae are implanted and where the tip is positioned.

The basic ECLS modes—venovenous (VV) and venoarterial (VA)—have evolved considerably over the years, with additional indications for use, including strategies that have rather different intensions for support (i.e., bridge to recovery, bridge to transplant or surgery, bridge to decision, and bridge to destination). As a result, clinicians started to employ new cannulae and new cannula configurations for ECLS management, either from the start or during support based on the clinical conditions [810]. For example, the use of an additional (“third”) cannula was progressively implemented to increase the capacity for venous drainage or to improve the systemic oxygenation in VA ECMO patients (e.g., by adding an additional venous return cannula—the hybrid mode VVA). Without a formalized approach to nomenclature, inconsistencies arose between studies and settings, between modes and configurations. Hence, in one center, “VVA” could represent VA ECMO with dual return cannulae, one in an artery and one in a vein, while in another center it might represent dual venous draining points in a VA ECMO. Thus, “VVA” or “VAV” may be used in the same center for VA ECMO with dual return cannulae, depending on whether the initial mode was VV or VA [10]. Separately, smaller catheters may be placed to promote distal perfusion of a cannulated lower extremity, e.g., on the arterial side [11, 12], or to improve drainage or release congestion of an extremity, the heart, or head (cephalad catheter) [1216]. Abbreviating these cannulae adds further opportunity for confusion.

The aim of this work is to describe the stepwise derivation of the nomenclature for the creation of straightforward abbreviations for cannulation configurations in ECLS.

Methods

This document represents a consensus on abbreviations for the ELSO nomenclature for peripheral and central cannulation configurations in ECLS. The contributors represent multiple specialties that perform ECLS, including cardiothoracic surgery, pediatric surgery, surgical intensive care, anesthesiology, cardiology, pulmonary medicine, medical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, neonatology, and emergency medicine. The contributors also represent the international chapters of the ELSO, including the North American, Latin American, European, South and West Asian, and Asian-Pacific, conveying a global perspective on ECLS. The initiative for this detailed classification was formalized in Maastricht, The Netherlands, at the 6th Euro-ELSO annual meeting in 2017, as the Nomenclature Task Force assembled by ELSO decided to publish a consensus statement on terms, abbreviations, and synonyms, the definitions of which were implemented by ELSO earlier this year [1]. In that document, a brief presentation of the nomenclature and taxonomy for ECLS cannulation was provided.

The current document is the expanded detailed description of the ELSO nomenclature for peripheral and central ECLS. The classification introduces third and fourth description levels to the two levels provided in our previous work [1]. This expansion offers the simplest level needed to convey cannulation information yet allows for more details when required.

The full ECLS cannulation nomenclature will be structured in these four levels:
  1. 1.

    Configuration

     
  2. 2.

    Cannulation site

     
  3. 3.

    Tip position

     
  4. 4.

    Cannula dimension

     

The manuscript will explain the four levels of the nomenclature in detail. The full nomenclature will allow practitioners to use standardized abbreviations for all ECLS modalities. Its goal is to establish consistency for clinical and research descriptions.

Results

Definitions of cannulation

Peripheral cannulation is defined as a cannulation in which the vessel puncture, venotomy or arteriotomy, is performed on a vascular structure(s) outside the thoracic or abdominal cavity (Fig. 1) [1]. Such cannulation may be performed with the Seldinger technique, a cut-down procedure, or a combination of both (semi-Seldinger technique).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Anatomical locations for cannulation and tip positioning. All potential peripheral cannulation sites of venous/drainage or arterial/return can be easily identified with different letters (see text for further details). Cannula tip positions are indicated by blue circles

Central cannulation is defined as any cannulation on cardiac structures, intrathoracic aorta, or pulmonary artery. These procedures require sternotomy or thoracotomy [1], although percutaneous access has been anecdotally described with already available or dedicated cannulae and may, therefore [17], be used more frequently in the future.

The ELSO classification for peripheral cannulation configurations

Flow direction

The basic proposal for ECLS configuration is to describe the direction of blood flow from left to right, with the drainage side on the left and the point at which oxygenated blood is returned to the patient on the right (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Different levels of the nomenclature. The nomenclature levels are presented in order from Level 1 to Level 4. Abbreviations may be used according to each center’s praxis from Level 1 or more detailed. Levels may be combined according to the user’s preference, e.g., Levels 2 and 4. The drainage cannula is placed on the left of the hyphen (“-”). The return cannula is placed on the right side. More precise positions (that do not directly relate to a cannula or catheter) are given as indexes, e.g., femoral (f), left (l) or right (r), atrium (a). For the complete lists of abbreviations, see Table 2 and Additional file 1

Level 1: Cannula hierarchy

All cannulae contributing to a major drainage or return flow are written in uppercase letters. All cannulae or catheters with a minor flow for unloading of a specific anatomical location or promoting perfusion are written in lowercase letters after the major flow cannula to which side it belongs (Additional file 1 and Additional file 2 section A). Additional file 1 shows the whole nomenclature and may support the text that follows.

To increase consistency, a hyphen is used to illustrate the relative position of the extracorporeal membrane lung (ML) in the configuration described. Thus, for single-lumen cannula applications, the drainage cannula will always be to the left of the hyphen, and the return cannula will be to the right of the hyphen (Fig. 2). As such, a two-letter mode cannot be misinterpreted and will be kept designated (“V-V” or “V-A” cannulation), where V indicates venous, A indicates arterial, and - indicates the ML. A second ML used in parallel to another will be indicated as “V=V”, and rarely, if the second ML is put in series, the configuration would be indicated as “V+A”. To allow for pure peripheral cardiac support, i.e., no ML in circuit, “x” replaces the ML (VxA).

This nomenclature would also be applied to pumpless ECLS (e.g., “A-V” for AV ECCO2R) [18, 19]. In a pumpless configuration (peripheral or central), “pl” is placed directly before the drainage cannula in parentheses, (pl)A-V. If a V-V configuration uses a double-lumen cannula (DLC), the abbreviation “dl” should be used in parentheses before the first “V”, (dl)V-V. For an even greater degree of detail, “dl” could be exchanged for “bc” or “ca” to indicate the use of a bi-caval or cavo-atrial DLC, respectively.

When a third (and sometimes fourth) cannula is used, that additional uppercase letter is placed accordingly to the outer side of the already existing cannulae, which constitute the core. As an example, if a second venous drainage cannula is added, that “V” will be put to the left of the hyphen and outside of the first drainage cannula: “VV-A”. If during V-A, an additional re-entry cannula is placed in any vein to improve systemic oxygenation in parallel to the initial arterial cannula, that “V” is added to the outer right side because it represents post-ML flow (return): “V-AV”, If an arterial cannula is added to a “V-V” configuration, that would be expressed as “V-VA”. Thus, over a course of an ECMO run, the configuration order will in part describe the patient’s temporal needs for support (i.e., chronology). If a VVA mode configuration is implanted in one instance and the major concern is cardiac support, V-AV should underline this fact. If the reason is unknown, the recommendation is to keep in line with the VVA mode, i.e., V-VA. The nomenclature does not allow for discrimination of the respective VV and VA proportional support, and in regard to physiology, V-VA is the same as V-AV. However, the hyphen should be included in the text, and for oral communication, it is necessary to say, especially concerning VV-A, “Vee-and-Vee-to-A”, and for V-VA, “Vee-to-Vee-and-A”.

In the rare case of a patient who has dual venous draining points followed by oxygenated blood pumped back to both the venous and arterial sides, the correct abbreviation would be “VV-VA” (or VV-AV). If VV ECMO is running with three cannulae (e.g., two venous drainage cannulae), the abbreviation would be “VV-V”.

In the case of V-A configuration with a femoral arterial cannula, a distal perfusion cannula may be placed to enhance perfusion of the cannulated leg. Such a minor flow catheter will be denoted with a lowercase “d”. As an example, a venoarterial ECMO configuration with distal reperfusion would be indicated as “V-Ad”. A lowercase “d” always follows directly after the uppercase “A”—the cannula it supports. For the special circumstance in which a patient receives a recently developed single-lumen cannula for femoral arterial return, designed with an in situ port for limb reperfusion (i.e., a punched hole on the cannula), the “A” and “d” will be underscored (“Ad”). Because the cannula is one single-lumen device, the letters are not separated. Thus, there is no risk for misunderstanding at any level of hierarchy (V-Ad vs. V-Ad). Jugular venous bulb catheters, which are known as “cephalad” cannulae and used typically in neonates or children as an adjunct to increase venous drainage, augment circuit flow, and decompress cerebral venous pressure during ECMO, will be indicated by a lowercase “cep”: (Vcep-V). The identification for atrial or ventricular venting is “vnt”, as exemplified by Vvnt-A. The lowercase letter is always placed directly after the major cannula to which it interrelates.

If a DLC is being used, and an additional arterial cannula must be added for circulatory support (VVA mode), the abbreviation would be “(dl)V-VA”. If the DLC limbs are unified (Y-connector) for drainage and an arterial cannula added (VA mode), the configuration would be (dl)VV-A. The novel hooked design DLC for right ventricular support would be “(dl)V-P”. The curved cannula passes via the superior vena cava, right atrium (RA, its drainage site), right ventricle, and out to the pulmonary artery. Finally, if a single venous drainage cannula is used, and the re-entry cannula is inserted through the jugular or subclavian vein up to the pulmonary artery to support the right ventricle, the abbreviation would be “V-P”, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Nomenclature for configuration of peripheral cannulation in extracorporeal life support

Modes

VV (ECMO)

VA (ECMO)

VVA (ECMO)

AV (ECCO2R)

Flow direction, from ➔ ML➔ to

V-V, VV-V

V-V

V-A, VV-A

V-VA

V-VA

V-AV

A-V

Configuration

Single-lumen cannulae

Dual-lumen cannula

Single-lumen cannulae

Single-lumen cannulae from V-V

Dual-lumen cannula from V-V

Single-lumen cannulae from V-A

Single-lumen cannulae

Level 1: Hierarchy

Upper case = major flow cannula Lower case = minor flow cannula

Vcep-V

(dl)V-V, (ca)V-V, (bc)Vcep-V

V-Ad, (dl)VV-Ad

Vv-VAd

(dl)V-VA

V-AdV

(pl)A-V

Level 2: Cannulation site

Indexed

Vf-Vj

(dl)Vf-V, (ca)Vjcep-V

Vj-Af, VjVf-Afd, Vj-Acar

Vf-VjAf

(bc)Vj-VAfd

Vj-AfVf

(pl)Afl-Vfr

Level 3: Tip position

Indexed

Vivc-Va, Vjacep-Vf

Vfsvc-Vf

Vja-Aflidpvntal, Vja-Asrg, Vj-Ai

Vf-VfivcAf, Vf-VjAi

(ca)Vj-VAslc

Vjavc-AfrdpVfr

(pl)Afri-Vfli

Level 4: Cannula dimension

OD/L, L is never given unless OD first

V21/50-V17, V21f-V17fivc V23/25a-V17f

(dl31)V-V, (ca32)Vjcep-V

V25/25-A17/18, V29fa-Afdt V25flsvc-Afl19dp

V25/38j-Vf A19/18fdt

(dl23)V-VAf

V25/25java-A21frdpV17/50fr

(pl)A15/17fr-V15fl

Abbreviations: (−), membrane lung, bc bi-caval dual-lumen cannula, ca cavo-atrial dual-lumen cannula, dl dual-lumen cannula, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO2R extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, VA V-A venoarterial, VV V-V venovenous, VVA venovenoarterial

Level 1: A, arterial; cep, cephalad drainage; d, distal perfusion of cannulated leg; P, pulmonary artery; pl, pumpless; V, venous; vnt, cardiac venting

Level 2: car, carotid; f, femoral; g, chimney graft; j, jugular; l, left; r, right; s, subclavian

Level 3: a, atrium (Va, “a” index for venous cannula tip in right atrium; vntal, “al”, (“ar”) index for venting catheter in left (right) atrium); c, left cardiac ventricle (vntc, “c” index for venting catheter position); i, iliac vein/lower inferior vena cava, or iliac artery; ivc, hepatic vein level in inferior vena cava; l, left; p, pedal (ankle), (dp, “p” indicate distal (pedal) retrograde perfusion at ankle of cannulated leg); r, right; svc, superior vena cava; t, thigh (groin), (dt, “t” denotes distal perfusion with cannula placed in femoral cannulation site)

Level 4: L, cannula length in centimeters; OD, cannula outer diameter in French (1 Fr = 1/3 mm)

Level 2: Cannulation site

Level 2 describes which vessel is punctured/cannulated. This information is supplied by using indexes (subscript letters), as in the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) terminology for organic chemistry [20] or the tumor, nodule, metastasis (TNM) classification for malignant tumors [21]. For communication software that does not support subscripting, the indexed letters should be placed in parenthesis directly after the related cannula. For the DLC abbreviation, the lowercase (dl) is always placed before the V-V and cannot be misunderstood. The following Level 2 examples with indexes thus explain the site for ECMO cannulation (see Additional file 1). V-V ECMO in femoro-femoral flow direction would be represented as “Vf-Vf”, [or V(f)-V(f)]. “Vj-Vf” would thus be the alternative jugulo-femoral mode of V-V ECMO and “Vf-Vj” a femoro-jugular VV ECMO. For V-A configurations, “Vj-Af” would be the jugulo-femoral V-A ECMO, “Vf-Af” would be the femoro-femoral V-A ECMO, and “Vf-AfVj” would be V-AV ECMO in which the patient has a single drainage cannula via a femoral vein and dual return cannulae, one via a femoral artery and the other via the jugular vein. The nomenclature also allows description of the cannulated side. Left is denoted as “l,” and right “r”. The side-specific indexed letter is placed after the vessel, Vfr-Afr. For DLC, it is presumed that the site of cannulation and placement of tip are algorithm-congruent and so should not be reported. However, if new DLC cannula designs appear in the future, the use of (dl)Vj-V, or (dl)Vfr-V (via right femoral vein), etc. may be used to specify cannulation site in accordance with this nomenclature. If the index is placed after the second “-VV”, it would indicate the rare case of an extra venous return cannula, (dl)Vj-VVf. A DLC may also be used for V-VA ECMO with an additional arterial infusion cannula: (dl)Vj-VAfrd. The distal perfusion cannula is placed at the same side as the right femoral return cannula (A); thus, side subscript after “d” is not necessary.

Level 3: Cannula tip position

To use the index system to its full extent, the point of the cannula tip should also be indexed. This information will increase the readers’ ability to extrapolate the net point for drainage—or point of reintroduction of oxygenated blood—as this knowledge is crucial to understanding both recirculation fraction in VV ECMO [9] and the potential to develop differential hypoxemia in VA ECMO [2224]. Venovenous ECMO drainage via a femoral vein with the tip placed in the upper inferior vena cava at the level of the hepatic vein (designated “ivc”) and return of the oxygenated blood (via the right jugular vein) in the right atrium (a) would be noted as “Vivc-Va”. A “Vj-Vf” ECMO would be represented as “Va-Vf” ECMO (atrio-femoral flow mode). In recent years, different modes of cannulation that promote physiotherapy and mobility during bridge to transplant have been introduced [25, 26]. These modes would be regarded as part of an extended definition. The configuration in which a chimney graft is adapted to the right subclavian artery [21] would be V-Asrg, where “s” is subclavian artery, “r” is right side, and “g” denotes graft (see Additional file 1). A case of a femoro-femoral venoarterial ECMO with distal perfusion in the groin (thigh) would be indicated as “Vf-Afdt”. A pedal distal perfusion catheter will be indicated as “dp”. The abbreviation with indexes for left atrial (indexed “a” for tip position) venting is “vntal”, right “vntar”, and left heart chamber (“c”) vent is “vntc”. When “a” or “c” occur to specify a venting cannula, that letter can never mean anything else. A complete list of all potential sites of peripheral cannulation is shown in Fig. 1.

Level 4: Cannula dimensions

Finally, to specify the cannula dimension, the cannula size in French units (1 Fr = 1/3 mm outer diameter) should be added after the respective letter; V17-V15 indicates venovenous mode with a 17-Fr drainage and 15-Fr return cannula. Additionally, cannula length in centimeters could be added only if diameter is reported using the slash (“/”) symbol as: V18/20 to indicate a size of 18 Fr and a length of 20 cm (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Cannula length and diameter. Length and diameter of each cannula are reported as shown in this example. The diameter printed refers to the outer cannula diameter

It should be noted that current manufacturers have no uniform definition for “cannula length”. The insertion length (i.e., the distance from tip to where the cannula diameter starts to increase) is the measure of length that is the most appropriate concerning cannula flow physics and placement in the patient.

The rules applying to the complete detailed description of the nomenclature are shown in Additional file 3.

The ELSO classification for central cannulation

In central cannulation, the rules and hierarchy from peripheral configurations apply but will be more direct. All abbreviations for anatomical entities into which a major flow cannula is placed are expressed in two non-separable capital letters (Table 2). The site and tip position will in most cases be the same. Any minor flow catheter (i.e., venting cannula) is expressed as a lowercase letter. Central cannulation ECMO may be applied via conventional sternotomy, or when a membrane lung is incorporated, via any type of ventricular assist device circuit. If an ML is placed in the circuit of an assist device, the prefix “oxy” is added before the device (e.g., oxyLVAD). Examples are shown in Additional file 2, section B.
Table 2

Abbreviations used for extracorporeal life support central cannulations for cardiac and/or gas exchange supporta

Anatomical primary (not indexed)

Abbreviation

Comment

Cannula placed in right atrium

RA

 

Cannula placed in right ventricle

RV

 

Cannula placed in pulmonary artery

PA

Direct cannulation

Cannula placed in left atrium

LA

 

Cannula placed in left ventricle

LV

 

Cannula placed in ascending aorta

AO

 

Cannula placed in the innominate artery

IA

Chimney graft may be assumed

Atrial venting

vntal vntar

Atrial drainage catheter (l, left; r, right)

Left chamber/ventricular vent

vntc

Left chamber/ventricle drainage catheter

Left atrium vent

vntts

Trans-septal left atrium drainage catheter

Pumpless driven extracorporeal flow

pl

“pl” placed first in abbreviation

Transvalvular left ventricular support

TVLS

Transvalvular axial pump

Transvalvular right ventricular support

TVRS

Transvalvular axial pump

Left ventricular assist device

LVAD

If a membrane lung is put into the circuit: oxyLVAD

Right ventricular assist device

RVAD

If a membrane lung is put into the circuit: oxyRVAD

Intra-aortic balloon pump

IABP

 

aSystems may be pump-driven or pumpless

Combination of central and peripheral applications

Central and peripheral configuration abbreviations may be combined. Thus, abbreviations for cardiac venting are shown in Table 2, although they are also used for peripheral ECMO setups. In combinations of central and peripheral ECLS, the drainage to return is still from left to right; thus, either central or peripheral may be written first. The division between peripheral and central is made by a slash “/”. For bridge to transplant, some centers use a combination of peripheral venous drainage and central cannulation return via a chimney graft attached to the innominate artery [27]. The abbreviation Va-/IAg denotes drainage from the right atrium, ML, and return flow to the innominate artery (IA) via such graft (g). If the hyphen is omitted (Va/IAg), only cardiac support is provided. Note that the “x” used for peripheral pure cardiac support to mark the absent ML is not needed here because the slash represents the interface. More examples are shown in Additional file 2, section C.

Parallel independent devices

If two devices for any application are used in parallel, their abbreviations are separated by a back slash “\”. Thus, in central cannulation configurations, two supportive devices could be run independently in parallel. The nomenclature allows for this also in peripheral cannulation configurations. A few centers worldwide may adapt two separate (peripheral and/or central cannulation) ECMO circuits to septic patients to allow high blood flows in the resuscitative phase (personal communication: Warwick Butt, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia). To exemplify, Vfl-Afrdt\Vja-Asg is an abbreviation for two separate ECMO circuits, where the first drains via the left femoral vein with return flow via the right femoral artery with a distal perfusion cannula in the right groin. The second circuit drains via a jugular cannula with the tip in the right atrium and return flow via either subclavian artery where the return cannula is put into a chimney graft.

Chronology

If devices are applied at different time points, the first circuit applied should be to the left. If both are implanted during the same procedure, the one regarded as the most important (if one is) should be put first. The same accounts for simultaneous implantation of all cannulae for a VVA mode peripheral configuration, or any other setting that might carry an inherent time sequence.

Discussion

This classification system is presented with the goal of providing a more uniform and informative nomenclature for ECLS cannulation configurations. The system is intended to allow a quick and comprehensive overview of the ECLS techniques and cannulae, with minimal risk of misunderstanding. This classification includes (1) the ECLS mode, (2) the flow direction, (3) cannulation sites, (4) additional ECLS-related catheters, (5) the flow distribution (if > 2 cannulae), (6) cannula tip position, and (7) cannula dimensions. Simpler combinations of central and peripheral configurations can also be described with this system.

Special consideration

In a context where differential hypoxemia on VA ECMO (North-South syndrome) may occur, it should be noted that the nomenclature may contain information concerning the cannula tip positions. However, that information does not necessarily reveal the actual drainage point for deoxygenated blood [24]. In the end, clinicians may choose to adopt this system to the level that provides the depth of information they require. The level may vary depending on the setting or nature of the communication. Irrespective of the depth of classification employed, the main goal of this new system is to provide uniformity to the nomenclature.

Future applications

Future revisions may be needed to cover new technologies and alternate cannulation configurations that might be developed for implantable membrane lungs, such as for carbon dioxide removal (“intra-corporeal” or “implant”, ICO2R) or oxygenation (i.e., implantable membrane oxygenation, IMO or ICMO). To facilitate and propagate the use of this complex nomenclature, we are developing a mobile device application that will allow users to work with the nomenclature without needing to refer back to the manuscript.

Conclusions

This nomenclature could be used in its most simple form, with only ECLS mode and cannula site(s), or with a complete approach, as dictated by local practice in different ECMO centers. The benefits of using this uniform nomenclature include the ability to compare practices, and results, all over the world; more efficient communication of ECMO configurations and additional interventions for flow or oxygenation; and improved quality of registry data, which are used largely to provide epidemiologic information and outcome data for ECMO patients. One limitation of this approach is the inability to describe flow properties according to the design of the cannula in use. We also acknowledge that when it is used to its fullest extent, the terminology is highly complex. However, the flexibility of this nomenclature allows for uniformity of terminology even when only the initial lower levels are used.

Abbreviations

ECLS: 

Extracorporeal life support

ECMO: 

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

ELSO: 

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization

VA: 

Venoarterial

VV: 

Venovenous

VVA: 

Venovenoarterial

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Claire Levine, MS, ELS, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, for the final editing of the text.

Funding

No financial support was received for this work.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Authors’ contributions

LMB and FST drafted the manuscript. RL, MVM, FP, MDN, MB, MMB, RPB, RD, LG, VP, MHM, DB, EF, RHB, MMM, and SAC are responsible for the critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. All authors gave final approval of the article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
ECMO Centre Karolinska, Department of Pediatric Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
(2)
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
(3)
Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
(4)
Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department - Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, Netherlands
(5)
Department of Internal Medicine II, Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
(6)
Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Advanced Heart Failure and Mechanical Circulatory Support Program, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy
(7)
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
(8)
U.O.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
(9)
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
(10)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
(11)
Clinica las Condes S.A, Santiago, Chile
(12)
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
(13)
Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
(14)
Inselspital, Children’s University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
(15)
Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
(16)
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
(17)
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
(18)
Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
(19)
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
(20)
European ECMO Advisory board, Pavia, Italy

References

  1. Conrad SA, Broman LM, Taccone FS, Lorusso R, Malfertheiner MV, Pappalardo F, et al. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Maastricht Treaty for nomenclature in extracorporeal life support: a position paper of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201710-2130CP.
  2. Hill JD, O'Brien TG, Murray JJ, et al. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for acute post-traumatic respiratory failure (shock-lung syndrome). Use of the Bramson membrane lung. N Engl J Med. 1972;286(12):629–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zapol WM, Snider MT, Hill JD, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure. A randomized prospective study. JAMA. 1979;242(20):2193–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group. Lancet 1996;348(9020):75–82.Google Scholar
  5. Chen YS, Lin JW, Yu HY, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):554–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbaro RP, Odetola FO, Kidwell KM, et al. Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(8):894–901.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. de Bucourt M, Teichgräber UK. Image guided placement of extracorporeal life support through bi-caval dual lumen venovenous membrane oxygenation in an interventional radiology setting--initial experience. J Vasc Access. 2012;13:221–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Palmér O, Palmér K, Hultman J, Broman LM. Cannula design and recirculation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2016;62:737–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Biscotti M, Lee A, Basner RC, Agerstrand C, Abrams D, Brodie D, Bachetta M. Hybrid configurations via percutaneous access for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a single-center experience. ASAIO J. 2014;60:635–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Madershahian N, Nagib R, Wippermann J, Strauch J, Wahlers T. A simple technique of distal limb perfusion during prolonged femoro-femoral cannulation. J Card Surg. 2006;21:168–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Le Guyader A, Lacroix P, Ferrat P, Laskar M. Venous leg congestion treated with distal venous drainage during peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs. 2006;30:633–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitagawa H, Mccomb G, Ford E, Atkinson JB. Proximal and distal cannulation of the internal jugular vein for ECMO in a primate. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27:1189–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Skarsgard ED, Salt DR, Lee SK. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonatal respiratory failure: does routine, cephalad jugular drainage improve outcome? J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:672–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Avalli L, Maggioni E, Sangalli F, Favini G, Formica F, Fumagalli R. Percutaneous left-heart decompression during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an alternative to surgical and transeptal venting in adult patients. ASAIO J. 2011;57:38–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim HE, Jung JW, Shin YR, Park HK, Park YH, Shin HJ. Left atrial decompression by percutaneous left atrial venting cannula insertion during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;49:203–6.Google Scholar
  17. Napp LC, Vogel-Claussen J, Schäfer A, Haverich A, Bauersachs J, Kühn C, et al. First-in-man fully percutaneous complete bypass of heart and lung. JACC. 2017;10(24):e231–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Mascheroni D, Marcolin R, Fumagalli R, Rossi F, et al. Low-frequency positive-pressure ventilation with extracorporeal CO2 removal in severe acute respiratory failure. JAMA. 1986;256:881–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald M, Millar J, Blackwood B, Davies A, Brett SJ, McAuley DF, McNamee JJ. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2014;18:222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Favre A, Powell WH. Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry. IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Name 2013. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2013. ISBN 978–0–85404-182-4Google Scholar
  21. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. ISBN 978-1-4443-3241-4 Google Scholar
  22. Hou X, Yang X, Du Z, Xing J, Li H, Jiang C, et al. Superior vena cava drainage improves upper body oxygenation during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in sheep. Crit Care. 2015;19:68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindfors M, Frenckner B, Sartipy U, Bjällmark A, Broomé M. Venous cannula positioning in arterial deoxygenation during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-a simulation study and case report. Artif Organs. 2017;41:75–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Frenckner B, Broman M, Broomé M. Position of draining venous cannula in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory and respiratory/circulatory support in adult patients. Crit Care. 2018;22:163.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Javidfar J, Brodie D, Costa J, Miller J, Jurrado J, LaVelle M, et al. Subclavian artery cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2012;58:494–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Biscotti M, Bacchetta M. The “sport model”: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using the subclavian artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1487–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Chicotka S, Rosenzweig EB, Brodie D, Bacchetta M. The “central sport model”: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using the innominate artery for smaller patients as bridge to lung transplantation. ASAIO J. 2017;63:e39–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement