Open Access

Regulation of the cerebral circulation: bedside assessment and clinical implications

  • Joseph Donnelly1,
  • Karol P. Budohoski1,
  • Peter Smielewski1 and
  • Marek Czosnyka1, 2Email author
Critical Care201620:129

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1293-6

Published: 5 May 2016

Abstract

Regulation of the cerebral circulation relies on the complex interplay between cardiovascular, respiratory, and neural physiology. In health, these physiologic systems act to maintain an adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF) through modulation of hydrodynamic parameters; the resistance of cerebral vessels, and the arterial, intracranial, and venous pressures. In critical illness, however, one or more of these parameters can be compromised, raising the possibility of disturbed CBF regulation and its pathophysiologic sequelae. Rigorous assessment of the cerebral circulation requires not only measuring CBF and its hydrodynamic determinants but also assessing the stability of CBF in response to changes in arterial pressure (cerebral autoregulation), the reactivity of CBF to a vasodilator (carbon dioxide reactivity, for example), and the dynamic regulation of arterial pressure (baroreceptor sensitivity). Ideally, cerebral circulation monitors in critical care should be continuous, physically robust, allow for both regional and global CBF assessment, and be conducive to application at the bedside. Regulation of the cerebral circulation is impaired not only in primary neurologic conditions that affect the vasculature such as subarachnoid haemorrhage and stroke, but also in conditions that affect the regulation of intracranial pressure (such as traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus) or arterial blood pressure (sepsis or cardiac dysfunction). Importantly, this impairment is often associated with poor patient outcome. At present, assessment of the cerebral circulation is primarily used as a research tool to elucidate pathophysiology or prognosis. However, when combined with other physiologic signals and online analytical techniques, cerebral circulation monitoring has the appealing potential to not only prognosticate patients, but also direct critical care management.

Background

To function, the brain requires adequate delivery of nutrients and oxygen. A circulatory system is therefore required to maintain an optimal cerebral blood flow (CBF) for the brain’s diverse needs. Whilst oxygen and nutrient delivery is in part dependent on the pump supplying it—the heart—the circulatory system has also evolved mechanisms to ensure the precise control of CBF. The cerebral vessels have the remarkable ability to rapidly adapt and react to the brain’s chemical environment, to neuronal signals, and to the pressure within the cerebral vessels.

This review highlights clinically relevant aspects of cerebrovascular physiology and cerebral circulation monitoring techniques before outlining the state of current knowledge of the cerebral circulation in selected critical illnesses and highlighting promising areas for future research.

Review

Regulation of cerebral blood flow

A haemodynamic model for the cerebral circulation has been described that allows for interrogation of the regulation of CBF [1, 2]. In such a model, CBF is dependent on the pressure supplied in the cerebral arteries (arterial blood pressure (ABP)), the back pressure in the cerebral venous system (usually close to intracranial pressure (ICP)), and the resistance related to the diameter of the small cerebral vessels (cerebrovascular resistance (CVR); Fig. 1). This relationship can be simplified as:
Fig. 1

Regulation of the cerebral circulation. CBF at the level of the microvasculature is directly proportional to CPP (difference between ABP and ICP) and inversely proportional to CVR. ICP exerts its effect on CBF through changes in CPP; compression of the venous vasculature where the bridging veins enter the sagittal sinus ensures that the bridging vein and post-capillary intravascular pressure is always above ICP. CBF is modulated by the cardiovascular system in terms of the regulation of SV, HR, and TPR (red). Control of TPR with vasopressors forms an integral part of many CBF protective strategies (even when TPR is not the primary cause of CBF disturbance). CVR is regulated at the level of the arterioles (purple) by variations in vascular tone in response to metabolic, neural, or myogenic inputs. In ischaemic stroke or vasospasm, CVR is dramatically increased, usually at the level of large intracranial arteries. ICP (blue) modulates CBF through its coupling with cerebral venous pressure. ICP increases can be caused by increases in cerebral blood volume (arterial or venous), increased CSF volume or increase in parenchyma (oedema), or abnormal material volume (mass lesion). All therapies that modulate CBF do so via one (or more) of these pathways. There is typically significant interdependence between the therapies, determinants, and influences of CBF. For example, a drop in ABP would be expected to result in a drop in CBF but this is short lived due to the baroreflex (HR increase in response to drop in ABP) and cerebral autoregulation (decrease in vascular tone in response to drop in ABP). ABP arterial blood pressure, CBF cerebral blood flow, CBV cerebral blood volume, CSF V cerebrospinal fluid volume, CVR cerebrovascular resistance, EVD external ventricular drainage, HR heart rate, ICP intracranial pressure, IIH idiopathic intracranial hypertension, SV stroke volume, TPR total peripheral resistance

$$ CBF=\frac{ABP-ICP}{CVR} $$

Thus, cardiovascular, ICP, and cerebrovascular components are all important regulators of the cerebral circulation. Applying this model can provide crucial insights into the physiologic factors that regulate cerebral perfusion in health and elucidate why CBF regulation is often impaired in pathologic states.

The cardiovascular component

As early as 1890, Sherrington and Roy underlined the importance of the ABP in the regulation of CBF: ‘One of the most evident of the facts observed by us is that the blood-supply of the brain varies directly with the blood pressure in the systemic arteries’ [3]. The pressure that supplies the cerebral vessels is dependent on factors mostly outside the brain itself: the heart provides the cardiac output while the peripheral vessels provide the resistance, both of which contribute to the ABP supplying the brain. In this sense, the balance between the brain CVR and the total peripheral resistance determines the proportion of the cardiac output that reaches the brain. Thus, any pathological or physiological event that affects the heart or the vasculature as a whole has the potential to alter the cerebral circulation. Cardiogenic shock and arrhythmia may therefore impair CBF [4], as do conditions that affect the systemic vasculature such as sepsis [5].

Just as pathologies affecting ABP can affect CBF, therapies to augment CBF often do so by modulating ABP. Vasopressors act to buffer ABP by constricting peripheral vessels, while inotropes act to modulate cardiac output (Fig. 1). An important consideration of such an approach is that the relationship between changes in ABP and CBF is typically non-linear due to active changes in vascular tone occurring at the level of the cerebral arterioles—a process known as cerebral autoregulation (see later). Furthermore, modulating ABP as a therapeutic measure will not only increase blood flow to the brain, but will also increase blood flow to any vascular beds with a low vascular resistance.

The intracranial pressure component

At the distal end of the microvasculature is the cerebral venous pressure, which provides a back pressure that may impede CBF. The venous pressure in turn will be related to both the venous pressure in the larger cerebral veins and the ICP. If the ICP is above the pressure in the lateral lacunae that feed into the large venous sinuses (which are exposed to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space; Fig. 1), then these vessels will be compressed leading to a post-capillary venous pressure just above the ICP [6, 7].

Any increase in ICP has the potential to decrease the longitudinal pressure gradient across the vascular bed—the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP = ABP – ICP)—and, provided there are no compensatory changes in CVR, to decrease CBF. Thus, CBF is impaired by conditions that impede cerebral venous outflow (such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension or neck position) and by conditions that increase ICP (such as the oedema associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH)).

Because the skull is rigid, any increase in volume of a brain compartment can cause an increase in ICP. Increases in volume of the intravascular compartment, the CSF compartment, or the brain parenchymal compartment can all increase ICP and therefore decrease CBF. These compartmental volume changes could be caused by vascular dilation, hydrocephalus, or cerebral oedema. Therapies that alter CBF via ICP changes include mild hyperventilation to decrease vascular volume, CSF diversion through external ventricular drainage to decrease CSF volume, osmotherapy to reduce the brain tissue volume, or decompressive craniectomy to increase the space available for the brain parenchyma (Fig. 1).

The cerebrovascular component

At the level of the brain vessels themselves, CBF can be controlled by active changes in the diameter of the ‘regulating’ vessels, thus influencing the CVR.

The major site of active regulation of the cerebral circulation is thought to be at the level of the arterioles with their thick smooth muscle layer and ability for profound dilation and constriction [1, 2]. However, larger conduit arteries, capillaries, and venous structures may also be important in certain situations [811]. For example, during neuronal activation, relaxation of pericytes surrounding capillaries has been considered to account for a large proportion of the flow increase [9]. Cerebral venules and veins are characterised by a low density of smooth muscle cells and therefore have the ability to increase volume with any increase in pressure; that is, they exhibit a high compliance [11]. While probably not important in the active regulation of CBF, the compliant nature of venous structures may play a passive role in the regulation of CBF; for example, arteriolar dilation leads to an increase in the volume of post-capillary venules that increases cerebral blood volume [12] and by extension could increase ICP, decrease CPP, and therefore limit the increase in CBF.

In health, such changes in CVR or CBF are most obvious during brain activation; an increase in neuronal activity elicits a prompt and significant increase in CBF [13] mediated through vessel dilation. Alternatively, during an ischaemic stroke, a portion of the cerebral vasculature is mechanically occluded by a thrombus causing a localised increase in CVR and a decrease in CBF. During the vasospasm associated with SAH, large cerebral arteries constrict, again resulting in an increased local CVR and decreased CBF [14].

Changes in vascular tone of the cerebral vessels are caused by putative constricting and dilating substances. Such vasoactive substances may be supplied to the vessels via the bloodstream (e.g. arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)), produced locally (see ‘Neurovascular coupling’), or reach the smooth muscle fibres through direct autonomic innervation. Not surprisingly, this heterogeneity in the possible sites of vasoactive substance production can lead to difficulty in disentangling physiological mechanisms. For example, modulation of ventilation is commonly used to assess the function of the cerebral vasculature (see ‘Carbon dioxide reactivity’); however, such a stimulus can in principle alter cerebrovascular tone through three separate mechanisms: changes in PaCO2 reaching the brain [15], changes in autonomic activity [16], or direct changes in neuronal activity [17].

Synaptic transmission with its resulting glutamate release is the important stimulus for neurovascular coupling through the production of vasoactive metabolites such as arachidonic acid derivatives (20-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid, prostaglandins, epoxyeicosatrienoic acids), lactate, adenosine and nitric oxide [8]. The site of production of these metabolites includes the neuron, the astrocyte, and the smooth muscle cells themselves. Both neurons and astrocytes are ideally placed to mediate neurovascular coupling as they lie in close proximity to both the neuronal synapse where the signal is initiated and the smooth muscle cells of the regulating microvasculature; however, the relative importance of neurons versus astrocytes for neurovascular coupling is uncertain [8]. Regardless of the site of production, the site of action is the smooth muscle fibres surrounding the arterioles, or capillaries where the vasoactive substances produce changes in intracellular calcium concentration, which in turn alters the degree of smooth muscle contraction, and vessel constriction. For further review on neurovascular coupling, see [8, 1822].

The autonomic nervous system may also influence the vascular tone of cerebral vessels. Despite animal studies demonstrating a rich innervation of both the dilating parasympathetic and constricting sympathetic fibres, the autonomic control of CBF in humans remains controversial [23, 24] with the divergence in opinions probably owing to between-species variation in autonomic innervation, variations in brain metabolism between experiments, and heterogeneous autonomic nerve distribution in the different studies [25]. Nevertheless, stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion in humans decreases the estimated CBF [26] while blockade of the stellate ganglion increases the estimated CBF [27], highlighting a role for the sympathetic nervous system in the regulation of the cerebral circulation in humans.

In addition to the cerebrovascular, mean arterial pressure, and ICP components, cardiac output has recently been suggested to be an independent regulator of CBF [28]. Evidence for such a view comes from studies demonstrating a change in CBF after interventions that change cardiac output but have no effect on mean arterial pressure [28, 29]. An additional measure of CBF regulation could thus be assessing CBF as a fraction of the cardiac output. Although continuous and accurate measures of cardiac output are less practical than ABP, such an approach may provide additional insight into regional blood flow regulation in health and disease.

According to the conventional model (Fig. 1), for an increase in cardiac output to produce an increase in CBF without a change in ABP, both total peripheral resistance and CVR must decrease. As such, the autonomic nervous system has been speculated as the mechanism by which changes in cardiac output may alter CBF without changes in ABP [28]; however, a metrological issue should also be considered. The ABP measured in the examined studies (and the majority of vascular regulation investigations) is not the ABP in the large cerebral arteries, but the pressure in a small peripheral vessel or that estimated non-invasively at the finger or arm. Thus, in situations where an increase in cardiac output causes an increased CBF and seemingly unchanged ABP (estimated at the arm), it is possible that cerebral arterial pressure actually increases. This issue needs to be verified, probably in an animal model.

Finally, the simple schema provided in Fig. 1 must be interpreted with the knowledge of the interdependence of variables. The cerebral circulation appears to have several cerebroprotective mechanisms; for example, if ABP decreases, aortic and carotid baroreceptors will alter autonomic outflow to increase HR and therefore buffer ABP and CBF [30]. Similarly, as proposed by Lassen and elaborated upon by others, in response to a decrease in ABP, vessels will dilate in attempt to buffer CBF [31, 32]. These important cerebroprotective processes are known as baroreceptor sensitivity and cerebral autoregulation.

How to assess the regulation of cerebral blood flow

Given the importance of CBF regulation in many pathological states, the availability of accurate and practical assessment methodologies is crucial. Often the choice of an appropriate measurement technique depends upon the clinical need; a balance between availability, accuracy, and practicality must be reached.

Non-invasive monitoring techniques include transcranial Doppler (TCD) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) (for a recent review, see [33, 34]). Such modalities have several important advantages making them suitable for interrogating CBF regulation in the clinical setting (Table 1). First, both TCD and NIRS systems are portable and non-invasive, making assessment feasible in the emergency room, the critical care unit, or the operating theatre. Moreover, they capture high-frequency and continuous data that can be combined with other modalities (such as ABP or end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2)) to give information on cerebral autoregulation and CO2 reactivity (see ‘Carbon dioxide reactivity’).
Table 1

Clinical assessment methodologies for the cerebral circulation

Method

Principle

Global or local CBF assessment

Robustness

Invasive

Bedside

Continuous

Advantage

Disadvantage

TCD [33]

Doppler principle

Global (vascular territory)

Fair

No

Yes

Yes

High-frequency signal

Signal easily lost. Flow velocity assessment only

NIRS [34]

Absorbance of oxygenated and deoxygenated haemoglobin

Local

Good

No

Yes

Yes

Easy application

Uncertain intracranial contribution to signal

PBTO2 [37]

Clark electrode

Local

Excellent

Yes

Yes

Yes

Robust

Local

LDF [36]

Doppler principle

Local

Excellent

Yes

Yes

Yes

Assessment of microcirculation

Unknown biological zero

Thermal diffusion [35]

Thermal diffusion

Local

Excellent

Yes

Yes

Yes

Absolute CBF

Frequent calibrations

Duplex neck US [106]

Doppler principle

Global

Poor

No

Potentially

No

Absolute and global CBF

Semi-continuous

CT [107]

Time-dependent attenuation of iodine IV contrast bolus (perfusion CT) or Xe gas

Global and local

Excellent

No

Potentially

No

Global and regional CBF

Bulky and intermittent

PET [108]

Radioactive tracers emit positrons dependent on perfusion

Global and local

Excellent

Minimal (venous access)

No

No

Regional CBF and metabolism

Radiation, requires a cyclotron

MRI [109]

Perfusion-dependent decrease in T2 signal with gadolinium

Global and local

Excellent

Minimal (IV access) or no for arterial spin labelling technique

No

No

Absolute, regional and global CBF

Time-consuming, expensive, difficult to assess critically ill patients

CBF cerebral blood flow, CT computerised tomography, IV intravenous, LDF laser Doppler flowmetry, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NIRS near-infrared spectroscopy, P B TO 2 pressure of brain tissue oxygen, PET positron emission tomography, TCD transcranial Doppler, US ultrasound

Invasive cerebral perfusion methods include brain tissue oxygen monitoring, laser Doppler flowmetry, and thermal diffusion (for review of methodology principles, see [3537]). Whilst obviously only suitable for critically ill patients because of their invasive nature, these methods have the advantage of being relatively robust for long-term monitoring of the cerebral circulation. Brain imaging techniques (computerised tomography (CT), positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) have the advantage of offering a high spatial resolution of CBF data and the ability to asses absolute CBF, but are at present not suitable for bedside monitoring because of size, temporal resolution, and radiation exposure [38].

Extended assessment of cerebral blood flow regulation

Because of the interdependence of the factors controlling CBF, it is important to measure these factors (ABP and ICP) in addition to CBF. Further, one can assess the regulation of the system by assessing the efficiency of the cardiac maintenance of ABP through the baroreflex sensitivity and assessing the brain vascular reactivity using the CBF reactivity to a vasodilator stimulus (CO2 reactivity), to a perfusion pressure challenge (cerebral autoregulation), or to a burst of neuronal activity (neurovascular coupling). Such extended assessment allows for a comprehensive understanding of the vulnerability of a patient’s cerebral circulation.

Carbon dioxide reactivity

The cerebral vasculature is exquisitely sensitive to changes in the PaCO2: with a decrease in pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), cerebral resistance vessels constrict; and with an increase in PaCO2, cerebral vessels dilate [15]. These alterations in vascular tone are probably mediated by changes in extracellular hydrogen ion concentration resulting from diffusion of PCO2 from inside the vessels. Several lines of evidence indicate that cerebrovascular reactivity may be a non-invasive and practical marker of cerebrovascular health (see ‘Clinical applications of bedside assessment of CBF regulation’).

The CO2 reactivity of cerebral vessels can be conveniently assessed at the bedside by measuring the CBF response to a decrease in PaCO2 produced by hyperventilation or to an increase in PaCO2 from hypoventilating or adding inspired CO2 (hypercapnia). Typically, CO2 reactivity is measured as the change in CBF as a fraction of the change in PaCO2:
$$ Cerebrovascular\;C{O}_2=\frac{\varDelta CBF\left(\%\right)}{\varDelta PaC{O}_2\left( mm\;Hg\right)} $$

An important consideration is that changes in PaCO2 may also affect ABP or ICP and therefore changes in PaCO2 may alter CPP in addition to CVR. In the ideal monitoring scenario, therefore, one would monitor CBF (perhaps using TCD), ABP (using an invasive arterial line or non-invasive photoplethysmography device), PaCO2 (or end-tidal CO2 as a surrogate), and in some situations ICP.

Figure 2 demonstrates a CO2 reactivity test in a TBI patient. In this case, the TCD-based flow velocity (Fv) was measured during moderate hyperventilation aimed to make the patient mildly hypocapnic. An important consideration easily appreciated from Fig. 1 is that during a CO2 reactivity test, any CO2 influence on ABP or ICP may confound interpretation.
Fig. 2

CO2 reactivity after TBI. CO2 reactivity is a measure indicating how well vascular responses in the brain are preserved. Mild hyperventilation (PaCO2 challenge from 35 to 31.5 mmHg) is applied temporarily (1 h) in the patient after TBI. Right CBF velocity (FVR) in the middle cerebral artery decreased from 120 to 100 cm/s. CO2 reactivity is calculated as ∆CBF velocity (%)/∆ PaCO2 and in this case reactivity is ~ 5 %/mmHg—very good. However, at the same time ICP decreased from 32 to 27 mmHg and blood pressure (ABP) increased from 120 to 125 mmHg. Therefore, CPP increased from 88 to 98 mmHg. The formula for cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity does not take into account the possible interaction between chemoregulation and autoregulation. ABP arterial blood pressure, ICP intracranial pressure

Cerebral autoregulation

While cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity assessment attempts to gain insight into vascular function from the response of cerebral vessels to changes in PaCO2, cerebral autoregulation assessment attempts to gain insight into vascular function from the response of cerebral vessels to changes in ABP (or in some cases CPP). In some cases, where ABP or CPP is highly variable, the cerebral autoregulation phenomenon can be observed by plotting CBF averaged in groups of ABP or CPP (see Fig. 3). Such dramatic swings in ABP or CPP are not always observed, however, and therefore a typical assessment of cerebral autoregulation involves inducing an ABP stimulus and measuring the response of CBF. In clinical scenarios, CBF is measured before and after a vasopressor is used to augment ABP to give a point estimate of cerebral autoregulation.
Fig. 3

Long-term invasive CBF and CPP monitoring. Example of the ‘Lassen curve’ depicting the relationship between CPP and CBF. It is derived from a long-term plot of thermal-dilution CBF and CPP monitored in a patient after severe brain injury. The curve shows lower (LLA) and upper (ULA) limits of autoregulation, outside which CBF is pressure passive. Notably, within the autoregulation range, CBF is not ideally stable but shows an increase in CBF around the LLA, which is commonly observed in patients under mild hyperventilation (in this case PaCO2 was on average 32 mmHg). CBF cerebral blood flow, CPP cerebral perfusion pressure, ICP intracranial pressure

An alternative approach is to monitor continuously the CBF response to natural slow variations in ABP [39]. Such an approach has some important caveats: the natural ABP variations may not be strong enough to challenge CBF, and changes in CBF could be caused by factors other than ABP. However, the monitoring poses no risk to the patients and has the distinct advantage that it can assess long-term trends in cerebral autoregulation within a patient.

The simplest methods of monitoring cerebral autoregulation assess how the slow changes of ABP occurring in time compare with the slow changes in CBF (for review, see [32]). An example of this is the mean flow index (Mx), which measures the correlation between 30 consecutive 10-s averages of TCD mean CBF velocity and CPP [40]. Methods using the frequency spectrum of the signals are also available. By assuming that the cerebral circulation acts as a high-pass filter (high-frequency fluctuations in ABP pass through to Fv unimpeded whilst lower frequencies are dampened), transfer function methods assess cerebral autoregulation using the phase (shift in degrees required to align slow waves of ABP and CBF velocity), gain (dampening factor), and coherence (degree of association between ABP and Fv) [41]. NIRS can also be used for assessment of cerebral autoregulation in the time and frequency domain and is easier to apply in many situations (less operator dependency compared with TCD). NIRS-based autoregulation indices assess the relationship between CPP (or ABP) and NIRS-based cerebral oxygenation.

The transient hyperaemic response test is an alternative form of cerebral autoregulation testing which involves assessing the increase in TCD blood flow velocity after release of a short (5–10 s) compression of the common carotid artery [42]. The degree of increase in blood flow velocity in the seconds following release is thought to be a reflection of the extent of cerebral vasodilation in response to the reduced CPP during occlusion. An example of a transient hyperaemic response test is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Cerebral perfusion monitoring in SAH. On day 3 after ictus (top 4 panels), this patient with SAH from an aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery displays a normal middle cerebral artery Fv (~60 cm/s) and intact autoregulation (TOxa and Mxa ~0 (suffix ‘a’ indicates that ABP is used instead of CPP)). On day 7 (bottom 4 panels) a marked increase in Fv (to 120 cm/s) can be seen, which is accompanied by an impairment in autoregulation (TOxa and Mxa close to 0). The transient hyperaemic response test also failed to show an increase in Fv after the release of occlusion, an indicator of impaired cerebral autoregulation. ABP arterial blood pressure, Fv flow velocity, Mxa mean flow index (with ABP), TOxa total oxygenation reactivity index (with ABP)

In some cases, cerebral autoregulation can be estimated using ICP as a surrogate for cerebral blood volume. In this method, similarly to Mx, 30 consecutive 10-s averages of ABP are correlated with ICP to yield the pressure reactivity index (PRx) [40]. A positive correlation indicates passive transmission of ABP waves to cerebral blood volume and hence ICP, while a negative correlation indicates active counter-regulatory adjustments of the cerebrovasculature and intact vasoreactivity. PRx has the advantage that it can be easily measured continuously in any patient with a parenchymal ICP monitor, an arterial pressure line, and the appropriate analysis software.

From a critical care perspective, the assessment of cerebral autoregulation can be more practical than monitoring CO2 reactivity because we can utilise the natural fluctuations of ABP and therefore monitor cerebral autoregulation continuously. From a practical point of view, to monitor cerebral autoregulation requires a continuous estimate of CBF (NIRS or TCD are ideal), ABP (from an arterial line or photoplethysmography), and in some cases ICP.

Given the heterogeneity of CBF monitoring techniques and the versatility of signal processing techniques, a multitude of ‘indices’ or metrics of cerebral autoregulation have been proposed. Table 2 highlights the rationale of such indices and gives an opinion as to their usefulness.
Table 2

Summary of autoregulation indices

Autoregulation metric

Input signals

Calculation

Interpretation

Comment

Autoregulation index (ARI)

ABP, Fv

Compares the CBF response to changes in ABP with those predicted from a parametric model with 10 different ‘strengths’ of autoregulation [110]

ARI = 0 absent autoregulation, ARI = 9 perfect autoregulation

Moderately complex signal processing required

Flow index (Mx, Sx, Dx)

ABP (CPP), Fv

Pearson correlation between CPP and mean Fv (300-s window of 10-s averages). Sx and Dx calculated with systolic and diastolic flow velocity, respectively

Impaired autoregulation = higher Mx, Dx, and Sx

Simplistic yet prognostically relevant

Transfer function (phase, gain, coherence)

ABP, Fv

Derived from the transfer function of fast Fourier transform of ABP and Fv signals. Phase is the shift required to align Fv and ABP signals, gain the transmission from ABP to Fv, and coherence the statistical association between ABP and Fv

Impaired autoregulation = low phase, high gain, high coherence

Moderately complex signal processing. Some prognostic relevance

TOx, COx, THx, HVx

ABP (CPP), NIRS oxygenation

Pearson correlation between 30 consecutive 10-s means of ABP and tissue oxygenation (or total haemoglobin for THx and HVx)

Impaired autoregulation = higher TOx, COx, THx, HVx

Correlated with TCD methods but allows for longer term monitoring

TOIHRx

HR, NIRS oxygenation

Correlation between 30 consecutive 10-s means of HR and NIRS oxygenation

?Higher TOIHRx = impaired autoregulation

Used in preterm infants. Further comparisons with standard autoregulation indices required

Transfer function (phase, gain, coherence)

ABP, NIRS oxygenation

Derived from the transfer function of fast Fourier transform of ABP and oxygenation signals. Phase is the shift required to align oxygenation and ABP signals, gain the transmission from ABP to NIRS oxygenation, and coherence the statistical association between ABP and NIRS oxygenation

Impaired autoregulation = low phase, high gain, high coherence

Moderately complex signal processing

PRx

ABP, ICP

Correlation between 30 consecutive 10-s means of ABP and ICP

Higher PRx = impaired autoregulation

Robust measure for long monitoring periods. Simplistic and prognostically relevant

PAx

ABP, amplitude of ICP

Correlation between 30 consecutive 10-s means of ABP and ICP

Higher PAx = impaired autoregulation

Similar to PRx, may allow better estimate of pressure reactivity when the “pressure–volume” compensatory curve is flat, i.e. at low ICP

ORx

CPP (ABP), PBTO2

Correlation between 30 consecutive 10-s means of ABP and PBTO2

High ORx = impaired autoregulation

Further validation required

ABP arterial blood pressure, ARI autoregulatory index, CBF cerebral blood flow, COx cerebral oximetry index, CPP cerebral perfusion pressure, Dx diastolic flow index, Fv flow velocity, HR heart rate, HVx haemoglobin volume reactivity index, ICP intracranial pressure, Mx mean flow index, ORx oxygen reactivity index, PAx pressure amplitude index, P B TO 2 pressure of brain tissue oxygen, PRx pressure reactivity index, Sx systolic flow index, NIRS near-infrared spectroscopy, TCD transcranial Doppler, THx total haemoglobin reactivity index, TOIHRx total oxygenation heart rate index, TOx total oxygenation reactivity index

Neurovascular coupling

The increase in CBF accompanying cerebral cortical activation represents a further way of assessing the reactivity of vessels. Neurovascular coupling can be assessed with either TCD or NIRS to detect increases in CBF in response to cognitive, emotional, sensory, and motor tasks (for a recent review, see [18]). Although less studied than pressure or CO2 reactivity in the critical care population, neurovascular coupling assessment has great potential because it can be assessed non-invasively and repeatedly, and it reflects a physiologically distinct aspect of CBF regulation compared with CO2 or pressure reactivity.

Clinical applications of bedside assessment of CBF regulation

Using the methodologies described, the cerebral circulation can be assessed in the critically ill patient. In this particular setting, techniques such as TCD, NIRS, ICP, and ABP monitoring are desirable as they can provide a continuous assessment of cerebral circulation without the need for transporting the patient. Unfortunately, validated ‘normal’ reference ranges are seldom available for the cerebral circulation and interpretation must therefore take into account relevant patient comorbidities and the underlying physiologic milieu. In the following section we summarise the role of the cerebral circulation in TBI, SAH, stroke, sepsis, and prematurity.

Traumatic brain injury

The pathophysiology of TBI is classically split into two phases, with the primary injury occurring at the time of ictus and secondary injury occurring in the following minutes, days, or even weeks. A cascade of pathophysiologic events leads to altered cerebral and systemic physiology that adds insult to injury; derangements in glucose metabolism, thermoregulation, respiration, and cerebral blood circulation all contribute to neuronal injury [43].

The characterisation of the cerebral circulation after severe TBI is not straightforward partly because the disease entity itself is heterogeneous. Despite this diversity, it is clear that maintaining close attention to cerebral perfusion is essential in all patients. The cerebral circulation is universally compromised after severe TBI; CBF, CO2 reactivity, and cerebral pressure autoregulation can all be impaired at various stages after TBI (Table 3). Low CBF, high CBF [4446], and impaired autoregulation [47, 48] have all been associated with worse outcome (an example of temporal variations in CBF regulation in a TBI patient is shown in Fig. 5). However, while impaired CO2 reactivity has been shown to be related to unfavourable outcome in some studies [49, 50], this is not universal. Carmona Suazo et al. [51] used parenchymal brain tissue oxygen monitors to assess CBF in 90 TBI patients and found that, while all patients seemed to have a low CO2 reactivity on day 1, this gradually improved over the first 5 days of monitoring. Interestingly, CO2 reactivity on day 5 was higher in those with an unfavourable outcome. Unfortunately, a low sample size (n = 10 by day 5 of monitoring) and the potential for confounding changes in CPP make the generalisability of this surprising result uncertain.
Table 3

Cerebral haemodynamics in critical illness

Critical illness

Effect of disease on cerebral haemodynamics

Does the cerebral haemodynamic parameter relate to prognosis?

Flow

Cerebral autoregulation

CO2 reactivity

Flow

Cerebral autoregulation

CO2 reactivity

TBI

Decreased [45, 46, 111] then increased [46, 112]

Decreased [44, 113]

Decreased [44, 49, 114, 115]

Yes: decreased [4446, 111] and increased [44, 112] CBF related to poor outcome

Yes [44, 47]

Most studies find yes [44, 49], while some find no [51]

SAH

Decreased (vasospasm) [14, 55]

Decreased [54, 56]

Decreased [55]

Yes [62]

Yes [60, 62, 116]

Yes [117]

Stroke

Decreased [66, 67, 118]

Decreased [70, 71]

Decreased [68, 69]

Yes [66, 67]

Yes [71]

Yes [69]

Sepsis

Unchanged [78, 81], or decreased [5]

Unchanged [82], decreased [78, 79], or increased [83, 84]

Unchanged [82] or decreased [77]

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Preterm infants

Decreased [87, 89, 119]

Unchanged [93] or decreased [87, 88]

Decreased [88, 90]

Yes [119]

Yes [88, 95, 120]

Yes [88, 90]

CBF cerebral blood flow, CO 2 carbon dioxide, SAH, subarachnoid haemorrhage; TBI, traumatic brain injury

Fig. 5

Continuous cerebral autoregulation monitoring during refractory intracranial hypertension. Continuous monitoring of cerebral autoregulation using PRx in a patient after severe TBI, who died after 6 days because of refractory intracranial hypertension. During the first 3 days ICP was stable, around 20 mmHg. However, PRx showed good autoregulation only during the first day (PRx <0.3). Later PRx was consistently above 0.5 even if ICP, CPP, and brain tissue oxygenation (PbtiO 2 ) were satisfactory. After day 4, PRx was persistently elevated to >0.7. On day 6, ICP increased abruptly to 70 mmHg, CPP fell to 20 mmHg, and oxygen tension fell below 5 mmHg. The patient died in a scenario of brain-stem herniation. The only parameter which deteriorated early in this case was the index of cerebral autoregulation PRx. ABP arterial blood pressure, CPP cerebral perfusion pressure, ICP intracranial pressure, PRx pressure reactivity index

Given that CBF seems to show a distinct time evolution after TBI [46, 52], defining an optimal CBF is clearly problematic because it is likely to vary with the patients’ individual physiologic milieu, as well as the temporal evolution of disease. Furthermore, continuous measurements of CBF, although possible, are seldom feasible (Table 1) and therefore ICU therapies dictate not CBF per se but a target range of CPP. In this regard, individually optimising CPP to a continuously calculated measure of vascular reactivity such as PRx seems promising. The CPP dependence of PRx can be used to assess at which CPP the autoregulation is most efficient (i.e. the CPP at which the PRx is most negative). This is potentially important because CPP is a variable (unlike CBF or indices of autoregulation) that can be titrated precisely at the bedside. Importantly, the difference between CPP and the optimal CPP has been shown to be related to outcome [53].

Figure 6 demonstrates long-term continuous monitoring of cerebral autoregulation using PRx in a TBI patient. In this case, ICP was initially above 20 mmHg and then subsided. The CPP varied between 60 and 100 mmHg, and when this CPP was plotted against PRx a U-shaped, parabolic curve is observed with a minimum at ~90 mmHg.
Fig. 6

Long-term monitoring of PRx in a patient after TBI. ICP was first elevated to 20 mmHg and then decreased, showing some fluctuations over 7 days of monitoring. PRx had parabolic distribution along the recorded range of CPP (from 60 to 100 mmHg). The minimum of this parabola indicates ‘optimal CPP’ from the whole 7-day period (90 mmHg in this case—as compared with above 65–70 mmHg, advised by guidelines—which illustrates well that CPP-oriented management must be individualised; it is not true that one shoe size is good for everybody). Moreover, such a fitting of an ‘optimal curve’ may be repeated in time, based on data from the past 4 h. This enables prospective detection and tracing of ‘optimal CPP’ and targeting current CPP at its current optimal value, which may change in a course of intensive care. CPP cerebral perfusion pressure, ICP intracranial pressure, PRx pressure reactivity index

Subarachnoid haemorrhage

Spontaneous SAH most commonly results from rupture of an intracranial aneurysm. Following SAH, severe disturbances of CBF as well as CBF regulation can occur. These are frequently related to large vessel spasm, but may also be a sequelae of CBF dysregulation and a host of other pathological processes, such as cortical spreading depolarisations, acute inflammation, and loss of blood–brain barrier—all of which have been implicated in patient prognosis.

Early studies of experimental SAH in baboons revealed impaired CBF, CO2 reactivity, and cerebral autoregulation [54, 55]. However, like TBI, the clinical course of SAH is heterogeneous, especially with respect to CBF. Approximately 60 % of SAH cases develop vasospasm on TCD, which may be accompanied by impaired CBF and cerebral autoregulation [14, 56], and 15–30 % develop delayed ischaemic deficits [5759]. While the relationship between vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and outcome can be capricious, various aspects of cerebral haemodynamics can be useful in predicting the future clinical course: early impaired CO2 reactivity predicts vasospasm, and impaired cerebral autoregulation predicts delayed ischaemic deficits and poor clinical outcome [60, 61].

While CBF is typically within normal limits early after ictus, it is possible to see impaired cerebral autoregulation within the first 3–5 days after SAH [58, 60, 62]. Furthermore, Jaeger et al. [60] demonstrated that autoregulation can recover following the initial deterioration, a response that indicates a good prognosis. Figure 4 demonstrates the time course of CBF regulation changes in a patient after SAH.

Management strategies hinge on the early identification of delayed cerebral ischaemia, followed by the institution of hypertension to maintain CBF. Currently, nimodipine remains the only medication approved for prevention of delayed cerebral ischaemia. In this respect, optimisation of ABP according to cerebral autoregulation may be a promising avenue of research [63].

Ischaemic stroke

Ischaemic stroke is characterised by luminal obstruction by a blood clot. Thus, a region of the brain has abnormally high resistance and decreased flow (Fig. 1). In these patients, utmost importance is placed on prompt dissolution of the clot either by thrombolysis or intravascular clot removal [64]. Around the central core of infarct is a zone of tissue with depleted, but not absent, blood flow—the ischaemic penumbra. Prompt dissolution of the clot can salvage this at-risk tissue.

Unlike TBI, or SAH, a predisposition for ischaemic stroke can be determined by examination of cerebrovascular regulation; those patients with impaired CO2 reactivity are more likely to develop an ischaemic stroke [65]. However, like TBI and SAH, ischaemic stroke is a state where careful consideration of cerebrovascular regulation in the acute phase is imperative (Table 3).

In the acute phase of ischaemic stroke, those patients with the lowest global CBF tend to have worse prognosis [66], as do those with a greater proportion of penumbral to ischaemic tissue [67]. CO2 reactivity is depressed compared with healthy controls [68, 69] and those with lower CO2 reactivity have worse outcome [69]. Cerebral autoregulation also appears to be impaired initially, followed by further impairment over the ensuing several days before again improving (reviewed in [70]). In 45 ischaemic stroke patients, cerebral autoregulation impairment was related to both the size of infarct and functional outcome [71].

Ongoing controversy exists regarding how best to support the cerebral circulation after efforts to break down the intramural obstruction. While the prevention of hypotension after ischaemic stroke seems logical, knowledge of cerebral autoregulation has potential to help guide the management of blood pressure. Studies of continuous vascular reactivity are limited after ischaemic stroke because these patients are often managed outside the critical care environment without the insertion of invasive ABP or cerebral perfusion monitors that allow for continuous estimation of cerebral autoregulation. In this regard, non-invasive perfusion assessment with NIRS and ABP with finger photoplethysmography are promising.

Common to large ischaemic stroke, TBI, and SAH is the occurrence of spreading cortical depolarisations. These waves of near-complete depolarisation propagate slowly through the cortex (over a time scale of about 1 min) and are followed by several minutes of markedly depressed electrical activity [72, 73]. Their occurrence in an injured brain may decrease CBF, resulting in areas of ischaemia, and seem to lead to worse outcomes [74]. Whether they are a cause or a consequence (or both) of altered cerebrovascular regulation needs further investigation with simultaneous CBF circulation and electrocortical monitoring.

Sepsis

The host response to infection—sepsis—is characterised by dysfunction of multiple organ systems, including the brain. This host response can have implications for CBF: CPP is often low, pyrexia can alter CBF, and inflammatory mediators can alter vascular resistance [75, 76]. Compared with the aforementioned diseases, the cerebral circulation in sepsis is less completely characterised.

Some studies have found impaired CO2 reactivity [77], impaired autoregulation [7880], and decreased CBF [5] during sepsis, whilst other studies have found no significant changes in CO2 reactivity, cerebral autoregulation, or CBF [81, 82]. Interestingly, two groups have even found that, in the early phases of experimental sepsis in healthy volunteers, dynamic cerebral autoregulation is actually enhanced [83, 84]. Pfister et al. [78] found that autoregulation was impaired in those with sepsis and delirium, but not in those with sepsis only. These seemingly conflicting findings may be partially explained by the heterogeneity of the sepsis process itself. Some septic patients develop a hyperdynamic circulation with increased cardiac output and decreased ABP, while others have both decreased cardiac output and ABP. Moreover, the physiological changes in the cerebral circulation during sepsis probably evolve over time, thus making comparisons between different studies difficult.

Nevertheless, brain dysfunction is one of the earliest forms of organ dysfunction in sepsis and sepsis-induced delirium occurs in up to 70 % of patients [76]. Characterising the involvement of the cerebral circulation in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced delirium will probably require detailed haemodynamic studies with large numbers of patients.

Preterm infants

Premature infants do not have fully functioning cerebral vessels or cardiovascular systems and therefore vital organ perfusion is vulnerable. Using NIRS and umbilical artery ABP, continuous measures of cerebral autoregulation can be obtained.

Animal studies indicate that cerebral autoregulation starts to develop from around halfway through the gestational period [85]. Furthermore, even when static autoregulation is developed, the preterm newborn probably sits close to the lower limit of autoregulation [86]. Early human investigations using Xe CT and NIRS indicated that CBF, CO2 reactivity, and cerebral autoregulation may be impaired in preterm infants [8791] (Table 3). Further, more recent human data using TCD indicated that cerebral autoregulation is more impaired if the baby is more premature [92]. Still other studies have indicated that perhaps the premature brain is able to adapt to sustained [93] but not dynamic [94] changes in ABP; that is, ‘static’ autoregulation is intact, while ‘dynamic’ autoregulation may be impaired [91].

Analogous to TBI, determination of an optimal ABP has been attempted in these preterm infants with the finding that those who did not survive had an ABP below their calculated optimal, whereas those who developed periventricular haemorrhage had an ABP above their optimal [95]. An important consideration when interpreting studies on cerebral haemodynamics in infants is that, in addition to the influences of ABP and CO2 on CBF, arterial oxygen saturation can be highly variable, and can have profound influence on premature babies’ cerebral circulation [96].

Future directions

With the increasing availability of bedside physiology monitors and sophisticated online analysis software, large-scale integrated interrogations of CBF regulation are now possible. One important research theme is developing robust prediction tools based on cerebral physiologic monitoring for critically ill patients. Accurate prognosis is of obvious importance for patients, families, and clinicians alike, but current methodologies have some limitations. For example, prognostic tools in TBI use clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features on admission to predict patient outcome [97]. However, some of the input variables are open to interpretation (e.g. the grading of a CT scan), and prognosis should ideally be updated based on clinical and physiological developments. In this sense, prognostic tools that update risk estimates based on online monitoring of CBF regulation could facilitate clinical decision-making.

In addition to predicting outcome, incorporating knowledge of CBF regulation into management protocols seems promising. Hopeful examples in TBI include strategies that incorporate knowledge of cerebrovascular reactivity into either ICP [98] or CPP [53] management. Although still requiring further development and prospective assessment, similar techniques could conceivably be applied to any condition where ABP or CBF regulation is impaired.

Extending cerebral haemodynamic monitoring concepts to other critical care pathologies is important. For example, in cardiopulmonary bypass patients, NIRS-based autoregulation has been shown to be a significant predictor of outcome, and furthermore, as in TBI, an autoregulation-based optimal ABP seems to be prognostically important [99, 100]. An example of autoregulation-based optimal ABP during cardiopulmonary bypass is shown in Fig. 7. Cardiac arrest, acute shunt blockage, acute liver failure, pre-eclampsia, and malignant hypertension are all conditions that could perturb the cerebral circulation, and further investigation may reveal diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic insight.
Fig. 7

Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (re-analysis of raw data recording reported by Brady et al. [100]). TCD-derived autoregulation index Mxa fluctuates seemingly in a chaotic manner during surgery (period of laminar flow is denoted by near-zero pulse amplitude of the Fv waveform). However, its distribution along recorded blood pressure values resembles a parabolic curve—the same as seen in TBI patients—with its minimum indicating hypothetical ‘optimal’ blood pressure (in this case 96 mmHg). Adapted with permission of Prof. Charles Hogue and co-workers (John Hopkins Medical University) [100]. ABP arterial blood pressure, Fv flow velocity, Mxa mean flow index (with ABP)

Understanding the factors that modify CBF and vascular reactivity is also an important evolving area of research. Although a large part of the variation in cerebral autoregulation is accounted for by the level of ABP (or CPP) itself, other systemic and local factors may also be important. Preliminary investigations indicate that common occurrences in the critical care unit such as hyperglycaemia, altered renal clearance, erythrocyte transfusion, or rewarming after hypothermia are all associated with altered cerebral pressure reactivity, underscoring the need for an integrative approach to neuromonitoring [101104].

Finally, investigating and integrating additional aspects of CBF regulation into prognostic and therapeutic approaches is imperative. In particular, the computerised assessment of neurovascular coupling [18] and autonomic function (e.g. with baroreceptor sensitivity or heart rate variability) are non-invasive, provide unique information on the regulation of CBF, and can be coupled with conventional measures of CBF regulation such as cerebral autoregulation and cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity.

Conclusions

To date, there is no randomised trial showing that monitoring the cerebral circulation improves care of neurological patients. The link between autoregulation status and possible treatment is not firmly established, but great hope is linked to the idea of treating patients with an ‘optimal CPP’ (TBI or SAH) or ‘optimal ABP’ regime (cardiac surgery, preterm infants, or conceivably sepsis). However, these methodologies still await prospective clinical studies.

With such a research focus on characterising brain function in health, it is a sad fact that in most cases our ability to monitor brain function and the cerebral circulation in the critically ill patient is rudimentary. Recent Neurocritical Care Society guidelines attempt to correct this situation [105]. With the maxim ‘time is brain’, a renewed focus on high-fidelity cerebrovascular monitoring is required—irreversible cerebral ischaemia can occur in a matter of minutes.

Progress in the neurocritical care of vascular diseases will probably also depend on moving away from broad assumptions or ‘one size fits all’ physiological targets; each patient brings a different physiology which should be catered for. Using continuous markers of vascular function has the potential to optimise therapy to the individual patient’s need. With the sophistication of signal processing and bioinformatic tools increasing exponentially, the challenge lies in successful integration of cerebral circulation monitoring paradigms at the bedside.

Note

This article is part of a series on Neurocritical care, edited by Fabio Taccone. Other articles in this series can be found at http://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/NCRC.

Abbreviations

ABP: 

arterial blood pressure

CBF: 

cerebral blood flow

CO2

carbon dioxide

CPP: 

cerebral perfusion pressure

CSF: 

cerebrospinal fluid

CT: 

computerised tomography

CVR: 

cerebrovascular resistance

Fv: 

flow velocity

ICP: 

intracranial pressure

Mx: 

mean flow index

NIRS: 

near-infrared spectroscopy

PaCO2

arterial pressure of carbon dioxide

PCO2

pressure of carbon dioxide

PRx: 

pressure reactivity index

SAH: 

subarachnoid haemorrhage

TBI: 

traumatic brain injury

TCD: 

transcranial Doppler

Declarations

Acknowledgements

JD is supported by a Woolf Fisher scholarship (New Zealand). MC is partially supported by the National Institute for Health Research.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge
(2)
Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology

References

  1. Ursino M, Lodi CA. A simple mathematical model of the interaction between intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamics. J Appl Physiol. 1997;82:1256–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Czosnyka M, Piechnik S, Richards HK, Kirkpatrick P, Smielewski P, Pickard JD. Contribution of mathematical modelling to the interpretation of bedside tests of cerebrovascular autoregulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;63:721–31.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Roy CS, Sherrington CS. On the regulation of the blood-supply of the brain. J Physiol. 1890;11:85–158.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavus E, Bein B, Dörges V, Stadlbauer K-H, Wenzel V, Steinfath M, Hanss R, Scholz J. Brain tissue oxygen pressure and cerebral metabolism in an animal model of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2006;71:97–106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowton DL, Bertels NH, Prough DS, Stump DA. Cerebral blood flow is reduced in patients with sepsis syndrome. Crit Care Med. 1989;17:399–403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nakagawa Y, Tsuru M, Yada K. Site and mechanism for compression of the venous system during experimental intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg. 1974;41:427–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Piechnik SK, Czosnyka M, Richards HK, Whitfield PC, Pickard JD. Cerebral venous blood outflow: a theoretical model based on laboratory simulation. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:1214–22. discussion 1222–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Attwell D, Buchan AM, Charpak S, Lauritzen M, Macvicar BA, Newman EA. Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature. 2010;468:232–43.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall CN, Reynell C, Gesslein B, Hamilton NB, Mishra A, Sutherland BA, O’Farrell FM, Buchan AM, Lauritzen M, Attwell D. Capillary pericytes regulate cerebral blood flow in health and disease. Nature. 2014;508:55–60.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Willie CK, Tzeng Y-C, Fisher JA, Ainslie PN. Integrative regulation of human brain blood flow. J Physiol. 2014;592:841–59.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Schaller B. Physiology of cerebral venous blood flow: from experimental data in animals to normal function in humans. Brain Res Rev. 2004;46:243–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee SP, Duong TQ, Yang G, Iadecola C, Kim SG. Relative changes of cerebral arterial and venous blood volumes during increased cerebral blood flow: implications for bold fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:791–800.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox PT, Raichle ME. Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:1140–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Vajkoczy P, Horn P, Thome C, Munch E, Schmiedek P. Regional cerebral blood flow monitoring in the diagnosis of delayed ischemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:1227–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ainslie PN, Duffin J. Integration of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and chemoreflex control of breathing: mechanisms of regulation, measurement, and interpretation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;296:R1473–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Somers VK, Mark AL, Zavala DC, Abboud FM. Contrasting effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia on ventilation and sympathetic activity in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1989;67:2101–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zappe A, Uludaǧ K, Oeltermann A, Uǧurbil K, Logothetis N. The influence of moderate hypercapnia on neural activity in the anesthetized nonhuman primate. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:2666–73.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Phillips AA, Chan FHN, Mu M, Zheng Z, Krassioukov AV, Ainslie PN. Neurovascular coupling in humans: physiology, methodological advances and clinical implications. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  19. Peterson EC, Wang Z, Britz G. Regulation of cerebral blood flow. Int J Vasc Med. 2011;2011:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackman K, Iadecola C. Neurovascular regulation in the ischemic brain. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;22:149–60.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Iadecola C, Nedergaard M. Glial regulation of the cerebral microvasculature. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1369–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Girouard H. Neurovascular coupling in the normal brain and in hypertension, stroke, and Alzheimer disease. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:328–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Strandgaard S, Sigurdsson ST. Point:Counterpoint: sympathetic activity does/does not influence cerebral blood flow. Counterpoint: sympathetic nerve activity does not influence cerebral blood flow. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:1366–7. discussion 1367–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. van Lieshout JJ, Secher NH. Point:Counterpoint: sympathetic nerve activity does/does not influence cerebral blood flow. Point: sympathetic nerve activity does influence cerebral blood flow. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:1364–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ainslie PN, Brassard P. Why is the neural control of cerebral autoregulation so controversial? F1000 Prime Rep. 2014;6:14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Visocchi M, Chiappini F, Cioni B, Meglio M. Cerebral blood flow velocities and trigeminal ganglion stimulation. A transcranial Doppler study. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1996;66:184–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Umeyama T, Kugimiya T, Ogawa T, Kandori Y, Ishizuka A, Hanaoka K. Changes in cerebral blood flow estimated after stellate ganglion block by single photon emission computed tomography. J Aut Nerv Syst. 1995;50:339–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Meng L, Hou W, Chui J, Han R, Gelb AW. Cardiac output and cerebral blood flow: the integrated regulation of brain perfusion in adult humans. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:1198–208.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogoh S, Brothers RM, Barnes Q, Eubank WL, Hawkins MN, Purkayastha S, O-Yurvati A, Raven PB. The effect of changes in cardiac output on middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity at rest and during exercise. J Physiol. 2005;569(Pt 2):697–704.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lanfranchi PA, Somers VK. Arterial baroreflex function and cardiovascular variability: interactions and implications. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002;283:R815–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lassen N. Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiol Rev. 1959;39:183–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Donnelly J, Aries MJH, Czosnyka M. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15:169–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Willie CK, Colino FL, Bailey DM, Tzeng YC, Binsted G, Jones LW, Haykowsky MJ, Bellapart J, Ogoh S, Smith KJ, Smirl JD, Day TA, Lucas SJ, Eller LK, Ainslie PN. Utility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the integrative assessment of cerebrovascular function. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;196:221–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Davies DJ, Su Z, Clancy MT, Lucas SJE, Dehghani H, Logan A, Belli A. Near-infrared spectroscopy in the monitoring of adult traumatic brain injury: a review. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32:933–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Vajkoczy P, Roth H, Horn P, Lucke T, Thomé C, Hubner U, Martin GT, Zappletal C, Klar E, Schilling L, Schmiedek P. Continuous monitoring of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:265–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rajan V, Varghese B, Van Leeuwen TG, Steenbergen W. Review of methodological developments in laser Doppler flowmetry. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:269–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Rohlwink UK, Figaji AA. Methods of monitoring brain oxygenation. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2010;26:453–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Rostami E, Engquist H, Enblad P. Imaging of cerebral blood flow in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the neurointensive care. Front Neurol. 2014;5:1–9.Google Scholar
  39. Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Giller CA, Levine BD. Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:H233–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke. 1996;27:1829–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Panerai RB. Cerebral autoregulation: from models to clinical applications. Cardiovasc Eng. 2008;8:42–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Kirkpatrick P, Pickard JD. Evaluation of the transient hyperemic response test in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:773–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Menon DK. Cerebral protection in severe brain injury: physiological determinants of outcome and their optimisation. Br Med Bull. 1999;55:226–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Overgaard J, Tweed W. Cerebral circulation after head injury. 1. Cerebral blood flow and its regulation after closed head injury with emphasis on clinical correlations. J Neurosurg. 1974;41:531–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bouma GJ, Muizelaar JP, Stringer WA, Choi SC, Fatouros P, Young HF. Ultra-early evaluation of regional cerebral blood flow in severely head-injured patients using xenon-enhanced computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:360–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. van Santbrink H, Schouten JW, Steyerberg EW, Avezaat CJJ, Maas AI. Serial transcranial Doppler measurements in traumatic brain injury with special focus on the early posttraumatic period. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;144:1141–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu X, Czosnyka M, Donnelly J, Budohoski KP, Varsos GV, Nasr N, Brady KM, Reinhard M, Hutchinson PJ, Smielewski P. Comparison of frequency and time domain methods of assessment of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;11:1–9.Google Scholar
  48. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:11–7. discussion 17–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Poon W, Ng SCP, Chan MTV, Lam JMK, Lam WWM. Cerebral blood flow (CBF)-directed management of ventilated head-injured patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:9–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Schalen W, Messeter K, Nordstrom CH. Cerebral vasoreactivity and the prediction of outcome in severe traumatic brain lesions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35:113–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Carmona Suazo JA, Maas AI, van den Brink WA, van Santbrink H, Steyerberg EW, Avezaat CJ. CO2 reactivity and brain oxygen pressure monitoring in severe head injury. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3268–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin NA, Patwardhan RV, Alexander MJ, Africk CZ, Lee JH, Shalmon E, Hovda DA, Becker DP. Characterization of cerebral hemodynamic phases following severe head trauma: hypoperfusion, hyperemia, and vasospasm. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:9–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Aries MJH, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Steiner LA, Lavinio A, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ, Brady KM, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Smielewski P. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2456–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Hashi K, Meyer JS, Shinmaru S, Welch KM, Teraura T. Changes in cerebral vasomotor reactivity to CO2 and autoregulation following experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 1972;17:15–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Mendelow AD, McCalden TA, Hattingh J, Coull A, Rosendorff C, Eidelman BH. Cerebrovascular reactivity and metabolism after subarachnoid hemorrhage in baboons. Stroke. 1981;12:58–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Soehle M, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. Continuous assessment of cerebral autoregulation in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1133–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Pickard JD, Murray GD, Illingworth R, Shaw MDM, Teasdale GM, Foy PM, Humphrey PRD, Lang DA, Nelson R, Richards P, Sinar J, Bailey S, Skene A. Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial. BMJ. 1989;298:636–42.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Budohoski K, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kasprowicz M, Helmy A, Bulters D, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. Impairment of cerebral autoregulation predicts delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective observational study. Stroke. 2012;43:3230–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Kirkpatrick PJ, Turner CL, Smith C, Hutchinson PJ, Murray GD. Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (STASH): a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:666–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Jaeger M, Schuhmann MU, Soehle M, Nagel C, Meixensberger J. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage by brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity and its relation to delayed cerebral infarction. Stroke. 2007;38:981–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Pickard JD, Matheson M, Patterson J, Wyper D. Prediction of late ischemic complications after cerebral aneurysm surgery by the intraoperative measurement of cerebral blood flow. J Neurosurg. 1980;53:305–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Jaeger M, Soehle M, Schuhmann MU, Meixensberger J. Clinical significance of impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation after severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43:2097–101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Bijlenga P, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Smielewski P, Soehle M, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. “Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure” in poor grade patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2010;13:17–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP, Bruno A, Connors JJB, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, McMullan PW, Qureshi AI, Rosenfield K, Scott PA, Summers DR, Wang DZ, Wintermark M, Yonas H. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Markus H, Cullinane M. Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusion. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 3):457–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Firlik AD, Rubin G, Yonas H, Wechsler LR. Relation between cerebral blood flow and neurologic deficit resolution in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 1998;51:177–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Wintermark M, Reichhart M, Thiran JP, Maeder P, Chalaron M, Schnyder P, Bogousslavsky J, Meuli R. Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:417–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Cupini LM, Diomedi M, Placidi F, Silvestrini M, Giacomini P. Cerebrovascular reactivity and subcortical infarctions. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:577–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Alvarez FJ, Segura T, Castellanos M, Leira R, Blanco M, Castillo J, Davalos A, Serena J. Cerebral hemodynamic reserve and early neurologic deterioration in acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24:1267–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Aries MJH, Elting JW, De Keyser J, Kremer BPH, Vroomen PCAJ. Cerebral autoregulation in stroke a review of transcranial Doppler studies. Stroke. 2010;41:2697–704.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Reinhard M, Rutsch S, Lambeck J, Wihler C, Czosnyka M, Weiller C, Hetzel A. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation associates with infarct size and outcome after ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;125:156–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA. Chaos and commotion in the wake of cortical spreading depression and spreading depolarizations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:379–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Woitzik J, Hecht N, Pinczolits A, Sandow N, Major S, Winkler MKL, Weber-Carstens S, Dohmen C, Graf R, Strong AJ, Dreier JP, Vajkoczy P. Propagation of cortical spreading depolarization in the human cortex after malignant stroke. Neurology. 2013;80:1095–102.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Hartings JA, Bullock MR, Okonkwo DO, Murray LS, Murray GD, Fabricius M, Maas AI, Woitzik J, Sakowitz O, Mathern B, Roozenbeek B, Lingsma H, Dreier JP, Puccio AM, Shutter LA, Pahl C, Strong AJ. Spreading depolarisations and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:1058–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Bain AR, Nybo L, Ainslie PN. Cerebral vascular control and metabolism in heat stress. Compr Physiol. 2015;5:1345–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Burkhart CS, Siegemund M, Steiner LA. Cerebral perfusion in sepsis. Crit Care. 2010;14:215.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Terborg C, Schummer W, Albrecht M, Reinhart K, Weiller C, Röther J. Dysfunction of vasomotor reactivity in severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1231–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Pfister D, Siegemund M, Dell-Kuster S, Smielewski P, Rüegg S, Strebel SP, Marsch SCU, Pargger H, Steiner LA. Cerebral perfusion in sepsis-associated delirium. Crit Care. 2008;12:R63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Taccone FS, Castanares-Zapatero D, Peres-Bota D, Vincent J-L, Berre’ J, Melot C. Cerebral autoregulation is influenced by carbon dioxide levels in patients with septic shock. Neurocrit Care. 2010;12:35–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Berg RMG, Plovsing RR, Bailey DM, Holstein-Rathlou N-H, Møller K. The dynamic cerebral autoregulatory adaptive response to noradrenaline is attenuated during systemic inflammation in humans. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2015;42:740–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Di Giantomasso D, May CN, Bellomo R. Laboratory and animal investigations: vital organ blood flow during hyperdynamic sepsis. Chest. 2003;124:1053–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Matta BF, Stow PJ. Sepsis-induced vasoparalysis does not involve the cerebral vasculature: indirect evidence from autoregulation and carbon dioxide reactivity studies. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:790–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Brassard P, Kim Y-S, van Lieshout J, Secher NH, Rosenmeier JB. Endotoxemia reduces cerebral perfusion but enhances dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation at reduced arterial carbon dioxide tension. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1873–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Berg RM, Plovsing RR, Evans KA, Christiansen CB, Bailey DM, Holstein-Rathlou N-H, Møller K. Lipopolysaccharide infusion enhances dynamic cerebral autoregulation without affecting cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity in healthy volunteers. Crit Care. 2013;17:R238.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Helou S, Koehler RC, Gleason CA, Jones MD, Traystman RJ. Cerebrovascular autoregulation during fetal development in sheep. Am J Physiol. 1994;266(3 Pt 2):H1069–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Muller T, Lohle M, Schubert H, Bauer R, Wicher C, Antonow-Schlorke I, Sliwka U, Nathanielsz PW, Schwab M. Developmental changes in cerebral autoregulatory capacity in the fetal sheep parietal cortex. J Physiol. 2002;539(Pt 3):957–67.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Lou HC, Lassen NA, Friis-Hansen B. Impaired autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in the distressed newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1979;94:118–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Pryds O, Greisen G, Lou HC, Friis-Hansen B. Vasoparalysis associated with brain damage in asphyxiated term infants. J Pediatr. 1990;117(1 Pt 1):119–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Edwards AD, Wyatt JS, Richardson C, Delpy DT, Cope M, Reynolds EO. Cotside measurement of cerebral blood flow in ill newborn infants by near infrared spectroscopy. Lancet. 1988;2:770–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Müller AM, Morales C, Briner J, Baenziger O, Duc G, Bucher HU. Loss of CO2 reactivity of cerebral blood flow is associated with severe brain damage in mechanically ventilated very low birth weight infants. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1997;1:157–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Greisen G. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in newborn babies. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:423–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Rhee CJ, Fraser III CD, Kibler K, Easley RB, Andropoulos DB, Czosnyka M, Varsos GV, Smielewski P, Rusin CG, Brady KM, Kaiser JR. The ontogeny of cerebrovascular pressure autoregulation in premature infants. J Perinatol. 2014;34:926–31.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Tyszczuk L, Meek J, Elwell C, Wyatt JS. Cerebral blood flow is independent of mean arterial blood pressure in preterm infants undergoing intensive care. Pediatrics. 1998;102(2 Pt 1):337–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Boylan G, Young K, Panerai R, Rennie J, Evans D. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in sick newborn infants. Pediatr Res. 2000;48:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. da Costa CS, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Mitra S, Stevenson GN, Austin T. Monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity for determination of optimal blood pressure in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2015;167:86–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Tweed A, Cote J, Lou HC, Gregory G, Wade J. Impairment of cerebral blood flow autoregulation in the newborn lamb by hypoxia. Pediatr Res. 1986;20:516–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Marmarou A, Roberts I, Habbema JDF, Maas AIR. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e165. discussion e165.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Lazaridis C, DeSantis SM, Smielewski P, Menon DK, Hutchinson P, Pickard JD, Czosnyka M. Patient-specific thresholds of intracranial pressure in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:893–900.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Ono M, Arnaoutakis GJ, Fine DM, Brady K, Easley RB, Zheng Y, Brown C, Katz NM, Grams ME, Hogue CW. Blood pressure excursions below the cerebral autoregulation threshold during cardiac surgery are associated with acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:464–71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Brady K, Joshi B, Zweifel C, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Easley RB, Hogue CW. Real-time continuous monitoring of cerebral blood flow autoregulation using near-infrared spectroscopy in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Stroke. 2010;41:1951–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Sudhan N, Varsos GV, Nasr N, Jalloh I, Liu X, Dias C, Sekhon MS, Carpenter KLH, Menon DK, Hutchinson PJ, Smielewski P. Increased blood glucose is related to disturbed cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2014;22:20–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Dias C, Gaio AR, Monteiro E, Barbosa S, Cerejo A, Donnelly J, Felgueiras Ó, Smielewski P, Paiva J-A, Czosnyka M. Kidney-brain link in traumatic brain injury patients? A preliminary report. Neurocrit Care. 2015;22:192–201.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Lavinio A, Timofeev I, Nortje J, Outtrim J, Smielewski P, Gupta A, Hutchinson PJ, Matta BF, Pickard JD, Menon D, Czosnyka M. Cerebrovascular reactivity during hypothermia and rewarming. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:237–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE, Czosnyka M, Donnelly J, Liu X, Aries MJ, Robba C, Lavinio A, Menon DK, Smielewski P, Gupta AK. The effect of red blood cell transfusion on cerebral autoregulation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23:210–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, Vespa P, Bader MK, Brophy GM, Diringer MN, Stocchetti N, Videtta W, Armonda R, Badjatia N, Böesel J, Chesnut R, Chou S, Claassen J, Czosnyka M, De Georgia M, Figaji A, Fugate J, Helbok R, Horowitz D, Hutchinson P, Kumar M, McNett M, Miller C, Naidech A, Oddo M, Olson D, O’Phelan K, Provencio JJ, et al. Consensus Summary Statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care. Neurocrit Care 2014;21:1189–1209.Google Scholar
  106. Thomas KN, Lewis NCS, Hill BG, Ainslie PN. Technical recommendations for the use of carotid duplex ultrasound for the assessment of extracranial blood flow. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015;309:R707–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Miles KA, Griffiths MR. Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol. 2003;76:220–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Nasrallah I, Dubroff J. An overview of PET neuroimaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2013;43:449–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Jahng G, Li K, Ostergaard L, Calamante F. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive update on principles and techniques. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:554–77.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Kaloostian P, Robertson C, Gopinath SP, Stippler M, King CC, Qualls C, Yonas H, Nemoto EM. Outcome prediction within twelve hours after severe traumatic brain injury by quantitative cerebral blood flow. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:727–34.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Kelly DF, Martin NA, Kordestani R, Counelis G, Hovda DA, Bergsneider M, McBride DQ, Shalmon E, Herman D, Becker DP. Cerebral blood flow as a predictor of outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:633–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Engelborghs K, Haseldonckx M, Van Reempts J, Van Rossem K, Wouters L, Borgers M, Verlooy J. Impaired autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in an experimental model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17:667–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Golding EM, Robertson CS, Bryan RM. L-arginine partially restores the diminished CO2 reactivity after mild controlled cortical impact injury in the adult rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:820–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Lee JH, Kelly DF, Oertel M, McArthur DL, Glenn TC, Vespa P, Boscardin WJ, Martin NA. Carbon dioxide reactivity, pressure autoregulation, and metabolic suppression reactivity after head injury: a transcranial Doppler study. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:222–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Varsos GV, Kasprowicz M, Brady KM, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. Cerebral autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of three methods. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:449–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Frontera JA, Rundek T, Schmidt JM, Claassen J, Parra A, Wartenberg KE, Temes RE, Mayer SA, Mohr JP, Marshall RS. Cerebrovascular reactivity and vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study. Neurology. 2006;66:727–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Wintermark M, Flanders AE, Velthuis B, Meuli R, van Leeuwen M, Goldsher D, Pineda C, Serena J, Vd SI, Waaijer A, Anderson J, Nesbit G, Gabriely I, Medina V, Quiles A, Pohlman S, Quist M, Schnyder P, Bogousslavsky J, Dillon WP, Pedraza S. Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:979–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Greisen G. Cerebral blood flow in preterm infants during the first week of life. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986;75:43–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Mitra S, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, O’Reilly H, Brady K, Austin T. Heart rate passivity of cerebral tissue oxygenation is associated with predictors of poor outcome in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:e374–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Aaslid R, Newell DW. Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements. Stroke. 1995;26:1014–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Donnelly et al. 2016

Advertisement