Skip to content


Critical Care

Open Access

Bench-to-bedside review: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults

  • Benedict C Creagh-Brown1,
  • Mark JD Griffiths1 and
  • Timothy W Evans1Email author
Critical Care200913:221

Published: 29 May 2009


Nitric oxide (NO) is an endogenous mediator of vascular tone and host defence. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) results in preferential pulmonary vasodilatation and lowers pulmonary vascular resistance. The route of administration delivers NO selectively to ventilated lung units so that its effect augments that of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and improves oxygenation. This 'Bench-to-bedside' review focuses on the mechanisms of action of iNO and its clinical applications, with emphasis on acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Developments in our understanding of the cellular and molecular actions of NO may help to explain the hitherto disappointing results of randomised controlled trials of iNO.


Nitric OxideAcute Lung InjuryRight VentricleAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromePulmonary Vascular Resistance


Nitric oxide (NO) is an important determinant of local blood flow and is formed by the action of NO synthase (NOS) on the semi-essential amino acid L-arginine in the presence of molecular oxygen. Inhaled NO (iNO) results in preferential pulmonary vasodilatation and lowers pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), augments hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV), and improves oxygenation. These effects are harnessed in the therapeutic applications of iNO to patients with acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), to those with acute right ventricular failure (RVF) complicating cardiac surgery or acute pulmonary embolism, or in acute sickle chest crisis. Despite dramatic physiological improvements that are often seen during the therapeutic use of iNO, there remains a lack of evidence concerning any beneficial effect on outcomes. This 'Bench-to-bedside' review focuses on the mechanisms of action of iNO and its clinical applications, with particular attention to ALI and ARDS. Alterations in endogenous NO production and the use of exogenous intravenous NO donors in acute inflammatory conditions are beyond the scope of this review.

Administration of inhaled nitric oxide to adults

The licensed indication of iNO is restricted to persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates, yet most iNO is administered for unlicensed indications. Pharmaceutical iNO is available at a very high cost, and in light of this and concerns over potential adverse effects of iNO, international guidelines have been developed. An advisory board under the auspices of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists published its recommendations in 2005 [1]. Although this valuable project was sponsored by the manufacturer of iNO (INO Therapeutics, now part of Ikaria Holdings, Clinton, NJ, USA), the board stated that the sponsor had no authorship or editorial control over the content of the meetings or any subsequent publication.

iNO is administered most commonly to invasively ventilated patients, although other routes are possible. To minimise the admixture of high concentrations of oxygen with NO (risk of nitrogen dioxide [NO2] formation), the NO/nitrogen mixture is introduced into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator tubing as near to the patient as possible. It is obligatory to monitor the NO and NO2 concentrations, and although concentrations of iNO administered clinically should not cause methemoglobinaemia, guidelines recommend that methemoglobin levels be measured regularly. iNO administration reduces endogenous NO production, and therefore rapid withdrawal of iNO can cause a significant rebound pulmonary hypertension, but in clinical practice, this can be avoided by gradual withdrawal [2].

There is marked variation in response to iNO between patients [2] and in the same patient at different times. After prolonged use, there is a leftward shift in the dose-response curve such that, without regular titration against a therapeutic goal, there is a risk of excessive iNO administration, associated with toxicity and loss of the therapeutic effect [3]. A survey of 54 intensive care units in the UK revealed that the most common usage was in treating ARDS, followed by pulmonary hypertension [4], in keeping with results of a European survey [5]. By contrast, a survey of therapeutic iNO usage in adult patients from a single US centre (2000 to 2003) demonstrated that the most common application was in the treatment of RVF in patients after cardiac surgery and then, in decreasing order, orthotopic heart transplantation, ventricular assist device placement, medical patients (mostly with refractory hypoxaemia), orthotopic lung transplantation, and for hypoxaemia in other surgery [6].

Inhaled nitric oxide in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

ALI and its extreme manifestation, ARDS, are characterised by hypoxaemia despite high inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 [arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen] ratios of less than 300 mm Hg [40 kPa] and less than 200 mm Hg [27 kPa], respectively) in the context of a known cause, evidence of pulmonary oedema, and the absence of left atrial hypertension suggestive of a cardiogenic mechanism [7]. Pathologically, there is alveolar inflammation and injury leading to increased pulmonary capillary permeability and resultant accumulation of alveolar fluid rich in protein and inflammatory cells. This is manifest clinically as hypoxaemia, ventilation-perfusion mismatch, physiological shunting, atelectasis, and reduced compliance.

Since 1993, when the first investigation on the effects of iNO on adult patients with ARDS was published [8], there have been several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the role of iNO in ALI/ARDS (Table 1). The first systematic review and meta-analysis [9] scrutinised five RCTs and found no beneficial effect on mortality or ventilator-free days, but given wide confidence intervals, the authors concluded that the effects were uncertain. More recently, a meta-analysis considered 12 RCTs that included a total of 1,237 patients [10] and came to conclusions that were more definitive: no benefit was seen on mortality but there was improved oxygenation at 24 hours (13% improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio) at the cost of increased risk of renal dysfunction (relative risk 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.02). Indeed, the authors highlight a trend to increased mortality in patients receiving iNO and suggest that it not be used in ALI/ARDS. However, findings from meta-analyses of many small underpowered RCTs have significant limitations and should be viewed as hypothesis-generating, not authoritative. Further elucidation of why iNO may fail to improve patient outcomes stems from understanding recent advances in our knowledge of the biology of iNO, particularly those actions that occur outside the pulmonary vasculature.
Table 1

Studies of inhaled nitric oxide in adult patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome






Number of patients/centres

Patient details


Inhaled nitric oxide

Primary outcome

Secondary outcomes

Dellinger, et al. [48]



AECC ARDS within 72 hours. Excluded severe sepsis or non-pulmonary organ failure


1.25 to 80 ppm

Duration of MV

Oxygenation, PAP, and 28-day survival

Michael, et al. [49]



ARDS with PFR <150 mm Hg and CXR infiltrates

Usual care

5, 10, 15, and 20 ppm every 6 hours for 24 hours, then clinically adjusted

Improvement in oxygenation to allow decrease in FiO2

Persistence of improvements in oxygenation

Troncy, et al. [50]



Lung injury score ≥ 2.5

Usual care

Initial titration (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm every 10 minutes) and daily re-titration

Free from MV within 30 days

30-day mortality and duration of MV

Lundin, et al. [51]



CXR infiltrates and ARDS with PFR <165 mm Hg with MV for 18 to 96 hours

Usual care

2, 10, or 40 ppm (lowest effective dose)

Reversal of ALI

30- and 90-day survival, ICU and hospital LOSs, and organ failure

Gerlach, et al. [3]



0.6, AECC ARDS, FiO2 ≥ PFR 150 mm Hg, ≤ PEEP ≥ 10 cm H2O, and PAOP ≤ 18 mm Hg. Duration of ventilation ≥ 48 hours.

Usual care

10 ppm (with daily dose-response analysis)

Dose-response relationship with PaO2 and iNO

Duration of ventilation and ICU LOS

Park, et al. [52]



AECC and duration of ARDS ≤ 2 days

Usual care

5 ppm ± recruitment manoeuvres



Taylor, et al. [53]



ARDS with PFR <250. Excluded sepsis as cause of ALI and any non-pulmonary organ failure.


5 ppm in 192 patients

Survival without need for MV during the first 28 days

Oxygenation and PEEP and 28-day survival

AECC, American-European Consensus Conference (definitions); ALI, acute lung injury; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CXR, chest x-ray; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; ICU, intensive care unit; iNO, inhaled nitric oxide; LOS, length of stay; MV, mechanical ventilation; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; PAOP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; PFR, PaO2/FiO2 (arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen) ratio; ppm, parts per million.

The biological action of inhaled nitric oxide

NO is a naturally occurring colourless and odourless gas. In biological solutions, it is highly diffusible in water, with a half-life of seconds. NO was regarded mainly as an environmental pollutant prior to its identification as an endothelium-derived relaxing factor and an important determinant of local blood flow [11]. NO has an unpaired electron and, as such, reacts very rapidly with other free radicals, certain amino acids, and transition metal ions. In biological solutions, it is stabilised by forming complexes.

The canonical source of endogenous NO is the action of NOS on the semi-essential amino acid L-arginine in the presence of molecular oxygen. Neuronal NOS was the first isoform to be identified, followed by inducible NOS (iNOS or NOS2), and finally endothelial NOS (eNOS or NOS3). iNOS is calcium-independent and generates higher concentrations of NO [12] than the other isoforms do. Its activity is implicated in the pathogenesis of the vasoplegia that characterises septic shock.

Exogenous NO is administered by controlled inhalation or through intravenous administration of NO donors such as sodium nitroprusside or glyceryl trinitrate. Traditionally, iNO was thought to work exclusively in the lung, and thus be free from remote or non-pulmonary effects, through immediate inactivation by circulating haemoglobin (Hb). However, appreciation of the remote effects of iNO has highlighted the importance of the actions of NO on circulating targets (Figure 1).
Figure 1

New paradigm of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) action. This figure illustrates the interactions between inhaled NO and the contents of the pulmonary capillaries. Previously, NO was considered to be inactivated by haemoglobin (Hb), and now it is recognised that, both through the interaction of Hb with NO and the formation of S-nitrosylated-Hb (SNO-Hb) and through the nitrosylation of plasma proteins and the formation of nitrite, the inhaled NO has effects downstream to the lungs. SMC, smooth muscle cell.

First, proteins including Hb and albumin contain reduced sulphur (thiol) groups that react reversibly with NO. Previously, NO was considered to react with oxyhaemoglobin to form methemoglobin and nitrate or heme iron nitrosyl Hb and thereby lose all vasodilating properties. However, a stable derivate that retains vasodilatory properties is formed by a reaction resulting in nitrosylation of a conserved cysteine residue of the β subunit of Hb: S-nitrosylated-Hb (SNO-Hb). This reaction is favoured in the presence of oxyhaemoglobin, whereas binding of NO to the heme iron predominates in the deoxygenated state [13]. As such, circulating erythrocytes may effectively store and release NO peripherally in areas of low oxygen tension, augmenting microvascular blood flow and oxygen delivery via hypoxic vasodilation of systemic vascular beds [14]. Thus, in isolation, NO can act as an autocrine or paracrine mediator but when stabilised may exert endocrine influences [15].

Second, in addition to de novo synthesis, supposedly inert anions nitrate (NO3-) and nitrite (NO2-) can be recycled to form NO. Indeed, it has been suggested that nitrite mediates extra-pulmonary effects of iNO [16]. In the absence of molecular oxygen (hypoxic environment), NOS cannot produce NO and deoxyhaemoglobin catalyses NO release from nitrite, thus potentially also providing a hypoxia-specific vasodilatory effect. Given that effects of iNO are mediated in part by S-nitrolysation of circulating proteins, therapies aiming at directly increasing S-nitrosothiols have been developed. In a small observational study, inhaled ethyl nitrite safely reduced PVR without systemic side effects in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn [17]. In animal models, pulmonary vasodilatation was maximal in hypoxia and had prolonged duration of action after cessation of administration [18].

When inhaled with high concentrations of oxygen, gaseous NO slowly forms the toxic product NO2. Other potential reactions include nitration (addition of NO2+), nitrosation (addition of NO+), or nitrosylation (addition of NO). Furthermore, NO may react with reactive oxygen species such as superoxide to form reactive nitrogen species (RNS) such as peroxynitrite (ONOO-), a powerful oxidant that can decompose further to yield and hydroxyl radicals. NO is therefore NO2 potentially cytotoxic, and covalent nitration of tyrosine in proteins by RNS has been used as a marker of oxidative stress.

Cardiovascular effects

NO activates soluble guanylyl cyclase by binding to its heme group, and consequently cyclic guanosine 3'5'-monophosphate (cGMP) is formed, in turn activating its associated protein kinase. This protein kinase decreases the sensitivity of myosin to calcium-induced contraction and lowers the intracellular calcium concentration by activating calcium-sensitive potassium channels and inhibiting the release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. These changes cause smooth muscle cells (SMCs) to relax. iNO causes relaxation of SMCs in the pulmonary vasculature with a resultant decrease in PVR. The right ventricle (RV) is exquisitely sensitive to afterload, and if RV function is impaired, it may respond favourably to the decreased afterload, improving cardiac output. iNO must be used with caution in the presence of left ventricular impairment as the decrease in PVR may permit increased right ventricular output to a greater extent than the left ventricle can accommodate and this may excessively increase the left atrial pressure, causing or exacerbating pulmonary oedema. Similarly, pulmonary oedema can result from disproportionate vasodilatation of the pre-capillary compared with post-capillary vasculature, causing an increased transpulmonary gradient.

iNO augments the normal physiological mechanism of HPV and improves ventilation-perfusion matching and systemic oxygenation (Figure 2). In the absence of hypoxaemia being caused by ventilation-perfusion mismatching and HPV, the beneficial effects of iNO on oxygenation are severely limited. Indeed, experimental data confirm that intravenously administered vasodilators worsen oxygenation by counteracting HPV [3]. Further signs of the extent of non-pulmonary effects of iNO are increased renal blood flow and improved hepatic tissue oxygenation [14].
Figure 2

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). (a) Normal ventilation-perfusion (VQ) matching. (b) HPV results in VQ matching despite variations in ventilation and gas exchange between lung units. (c) Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) augmenting VQ matching by vasodilating vessels close to ventilated alveoli. (d) Intravenous vasodilation counteracting HPV leads to worse oxygenation. (e) In disease states that are associated with dysregulated pulmonary vascular tone, such as sepsis and acute lung injury, failure of HPV leads to worse oxygenation. (f) Accumulation of NO adducts leads to loss of HPV-augmenting effect. Reprinted with permission from the Massachusetts Medical Society [2]. Copyright© 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Non-cardiovascular effects relevant to lung injury

Neutrophils are important cellular mediators of ALI. Limiting neutrophil adherence experimentally and production of oxidative species and lytic enzymes reduce lung injury. In neonates, prolonged iNO diminished neutrophil-mediated oxidative stress [19], and in animal models, neutrophil deformability and CD18 expression were reduced [20] with resultant decreases in adhesion and migration [21]. These changes limit damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane and the accumulation of protein-rich fluid within the alveoli. Platelet activation and aggregation, microthrombosis, and intra-alveolar deposition contribute to ALI. iNO attenuates the procoagulant activity in animal models of ALI [22] and a similar effect is seen both in patients with ALI [23] and in healthy volunteers [23, 24]. In patients with ALI, decreased surfactant activity in the alveoli contributes to impaired pulmonary function and is of prognostic significance [25].

Although a major cause of diminished surfactant activity is the presence of alveolar exudate, iNO may have deleterious effects on the function of surfactant proteins through the alteration in their structure by reactions with RNS [26]. Finally, prolonged exposure to NO in experimental models impairs cellular respiration [27] and may contribute to cytopathic dysoxia.

The failure of iNO to improve outcome in ALI/ARDS is therefore potentially due to several factors. First, patients with ALI/ARDS do not die of refractory hypoxaemia but of multi-organ failure. The actions of NO are mainly considered to have their beneficial effects on oxygenation and are not expected to improve the outcome of multi-organ failure. Indeed, any beneficial effects of iNO on oxygenation may be abrogated by detrimental systemic effects mediated by downstream products of iNO. Second, ALI/ARDS is a heterogeneous condition with diverse causes, potentially requiring specific interventions to affect outcome. Finally, the use of iNO without frequent dose titration risks inadvertent overdose with increased unwanted systemic effects without further cardiopulmonary benefits.

Other clinical uses of inhaled nitric oxide

Pulmonary hypertension and acute right ventricular failure

RVF may develop when there is abnormally elevated PVR and/or impaired RV perfusion. Table 2 lists common causes of acute RVF. The RV responds relatively poorly to inotropic agents but is exquisitely sensitive to afterload reduction.
Table 2

Causes of acute right ventricular failure

Acute rise in pulmonary vascular resistance, such as due to acute pulmonary embolism or rapidly progressive pulmonary parenchymal/vascular disease

Acute right ventricular ischaemia, often due to diminished right coronary perfusion consequent upon inadequate systolic and diastolic pressures in shocked states

Acute high left atrial pressures, perhaps due to acute left ventricular failure of any cause

Decompensation of chronic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Decompensation of congenital heart defects with pulmonary arterial hypertension or left-to-right intracardiac shunts

After surgery necessitating cardiopulmonary bypass per se

Hypoxaemia causing hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction

Reducing PVR will offload a struggling ventricle with beneficial effects on cardiac output and therefore oxygen delivery. In the context of high RV afterload with low systemic pressures or when there is a limitation of flow within the right coronary artery [28], RV failure will ensue and potentially trigger a downward spiral, as diagrammatically represented in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Pathophysiology of right ventricular failure. CO, cardiac output; LV, left ventricle; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; RV, right ventricle.

iNO is commonly used when RV failure complicates cardiac surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass per se causes diminished endogenous NO production [29].

There is marked variation in response to iNO between patients [30] and in the same patient at different times. After prolonged use, there is a leftward shift in the dose-response curve such that, without regular titration against a therapeutic goal, there is a risk of excessive iNO administration that is associated with toxicity and loss of the therapeutic effect [31].

Cardiac transplantation may be complicated by pulmonary hypertension and RVF that are improved with iNO [32]. Early ischaemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation manifests clinically as pulmonary oedema and is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality [33, 34]. Although iNO is a useful therapy in this circumstance [35], it did not prevent ischaemia-reperfusion injury in clinical lung transplantation [36].

iNO has been used successfully in patients with cardiogenic shock and RVF associated with acute myocardial infarction [37, 38]. Similarly, iNO was valuable in patients with acute RVF following acute pulmonary venous thromboembolism accompanied by significant haemodynamic compromise [39]. No systematic evaluation of iNO and its effect on clinical outcome has been conducted in these conditions.

Acute chest crises of sickle cell disease

Acute chest crises are the second most common cause of hospital admission in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and are responsible for 25% of all related deaths [40]. Acute chest crises are manifest by fever, respiratory symptoms or chest pain, and new pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiography. Pulmonary infection, fat emboli, and pulmonary infarction due to vaso-occlusion are the major contributory factors. Haemolysis of sickled erythrocytes releases Hb into the plasma, where it generates reactive oxygen species and reacts with NO [41]. In SCD, the scavenging systems that would usually remove circulating free Hb are saturated. Free Hb depletes NO, leading to endothelial cell dysfunction. Haemolysis also releases arginase 1 into plasma, depleting the vital substrate for NO production, arginine [42]. Furthermore, secondary pulmonary hypertension is common in adults with SCD, with estimates of prevalence ranging from 30% to 56%. Given the physiological rationale for the use of iNO and supportive data from animal studies, there have been several cases [4345].

iNO has been used successfully in patients with cardiogenic shock and RVF due to acute myocardial infarction [46]. Similarly, iNO was valuable in patients with acute RVF due to acute pulmonary venous thromboembolism accompanied by significant haemodynamic compromise [47]. Thus far, iNO has failed to demonstrate either persistent improvements in physiology or beneficial effects on any accepted measure of outcome in clinical trials (other than its licensed indication in neonates). Therefore, iNO sits alongside interventions such as prone positioning and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in that they improve oxygenation without demonstrated improvements in patient outcome and therefore are usually reserved for refractory hypoxaemia.

Potential problems in designing and conducting RCTs in the efficacy of iNO are numerous. Blinded trials will be difficult to conduct as the effects of iNO are immediately apparent. Recruitment will be limited as some of these indications are uncommon and rapidly life-threatening with little time for consent/assent or randomisation. Clinicians with experience of the efficacy of iNO may not have sufficient clinical equipoise to recruit to placebo-controlled trials. Finally, given the expense of iNO, industry funding is likely to be necessary and this might both cast doubt on the independence of the trial results and exclude trials that may adversely influence sales.

iNO remains an important tool in the intensivist's armamentarium of rescue therapies for refractory hypoxaemia. iNO has a well-established role in managing complications of cardiac surgery and in heart/lung transplantation. There is a place for iNO in the management of ALI/ARDS, acute sickle chest crisis, acute RV failure, and acute pulmonary embolism, but it is likely to remain a rescue therapy.


This article is part of a review series on Gaseous mediators, edited by Peter Radermacher.

Other articles in the series can be found online at



acute lung injury


acute respiratory distress syndrome




hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction


inhaled nitric oxide


inducible nitric oxide synthase


nitric oxide


nitrogen dioxide


nitric oxide synthase


arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen


pulmonary vascular resistance


randomised controlled trial


reactive nitrogen species


right ventricle


right ventricular failure


sickle cell disease


smooth muscle cell.


Authors’ Affiliations

Unit of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College Adult Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK


  1. Germann P, Braschi A, Della Rocca G, Dinh-Xuan AT, Falke K, Frostell C, Gustafsson LE, Hervé P, Jolliet P, Kaisers U, Litvan H, Macrae DJ, Maggiorini M, Marczin N, Mueller B, Payen D, Ranucci M, Schranz D, Zimmermann R, Ullrich R: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults: European expert recommendations. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31: 1029-1041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffiths MJ, Evans TW: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults. N Engl J Med 2005, 353: 2683-2695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerlach H, Keh D, Semmerow A, Busch T, Lewandowski K, Pappert DM, Rossaint R, Falke KJ: Dose-response characteristics during long-term inhalation of nitric oxide in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167: 1008-1015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuthbertson BH, Stott S, Webster NR: Use of inhaled nitric oxide in British intensive therapy units. Br J Anaesth 1997, 78: 696-700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beloucif S: A European survey of the use of inhaled nitric oxide in the ICU. Working Group on Inhaled NO in the ICU of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24: 864-877.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. George I, Xydas S, Topkara VK, Ferdinando C, Barnwell EC, Gableman L, Sladen RN, Naka Y, Oz MC: Clinical indication for use and outcomes after inhaled nitric oxide therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006, 82: 2161-2169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R: The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149: 818-824.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rossaint R, Falke KJ, López F, Slama K, Pison U, Zapol WM: Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1993, 328: 399-405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sokol J, Jacobs SE, Bohn D: Inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxic respiratory failure in children and adults: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2003, 97: 989-998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Adhikari NK, Burns KE, Friedrich JO, Granton JT, Cook DJ, Meade MO: Effect of nitric oxide on oxygenation and mortality in acute lung injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007, 334: 779.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Palmer RM, Ferrige AG, Moncada S: Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature 1987, 327: 524-526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarthy HO, Coulter JA, Robson T, Hirst DG: Gene therapy via inducible nitric oxide synthase: a tool for the treatment of a diverse range of pathological conditions. J Pharm Pharmacol 2008, 60: 999-1017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Coggins MP, Bloch KD: Nitric oxide in the pulmonary vasculature. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007, 27: 1877-1885.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McMahon TJ, Doctor A: Extrapulmonary effects of inhaled nitric oxide: role of reversible S-nitrosylation of erythrocytic hemoglobin. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006, 3: 153-160.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cokic VP, Schechter AN: Effects of nitric oxide on red blood cell development and phenotype. Curr Top Dev Biol 2008, 82: 169-215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Gladwin MT: The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008, 7: 156-167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moya MP, Gow AJ, Califf RM, Goldberg RN, Stamler JS: Inhaled ethyl nitrite gas for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Lancet 2002, 360: 141-143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunter CJ: Inhaled nebulized nitrite is a hypoxia-sensitive NO-dependent selective pulmonary vasodilator. Nat Med 2004, 10: 1122-1127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gessler P, Nebe T, Birle A, Mueller W, Kachel W: A new side effect of inhaled nitric oxide in neonates and infants with pulmonary hypertension: functional impairment of the neutrophil respiratory burst. Intensive Care Med 1996, 22: 252-258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sato Y, Walley KR, Klut ME, English D, D'yachkova Y, Hogg JC, van Eeden SF: Nitric oxide reduces the sequestration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in lung by changing deformability and CD18 expression. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159: 1469-1476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bloomfield GL, Holloway S, Ridings PC, Fisher BJ, Blocher CR, Sholley M, Bunch T, Sugerman HJ, Fowler AA: Pretreatment with inhaled nitric oxide inhibits neutrophil migration and oxidative activity resulting in attenuated sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 1997, 25: 584-593.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kermarrec N, Zunic P, Beloucif S, Benessiano J, Drouet L, Payen D: Impact of inhaled nitric oxide on platelet aggregation and fibrinolysis in rats with endotoxic lung injury. Role of cyclic guanosine 5'-monophosphate. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 158: 833-839.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gries A, Bode C, Peter K, Herr A, Böhrer H, Motsch J, Martin E: Inhaled nitric oxide inhibits human platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression, and fibrinogen binding in vitro and in vivo . Circulation 1998, 97: 1481-1487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gries A, Herr A, Motsch J, Holzmann A, Weimann J, Taut F, Erbe N, Bode C, Martin E: Randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded and cross-matched study on the antiplatelet effect of inhaled nitric oxide in healthy volunteers. Thromb Haemost 2000, 83: 309-315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cheng IW, Ware LB, Greene KE, Nuckton TJ, Eisner MD, Matthay MA: Prognostic value of surfactant proteins A and D in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2003, 31: 20-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Robbins CG, Davis JM, Merritt TA, Amirkhanian JD, Sahgal N, Morin FC 3rd, Horowitz S: Combined effects of nitric oxide and hyperoxia on surfactant function and pulmonary inflammation. Am J Physiol 1995,269(4 Pt 1):L545-550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Clementi E, Brown GC, Feelisch M, Moncada S: Persistent inhibition of cell respiration by nitric oxide: crucial role of S-nitro-sylation of mitochondrial complex I and protective action of glutathione. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95: 7631-7636.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vlahakes GJ: Right ventricular failure following cardiac surgery. Coron Artery Dis 2005, 16: 27-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Morita K, Ihnken K, Buckberg GD, Sherman MP, Ignarro LJ: Pulmonary vasoconstriction due to impaired nitric oxide production after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996, 61: 1775-1780.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wessel DL, Adatia I, Giglia TM, Thompson JE, Kulik TJ: Use of inhaled nitric oxide and acetylcholine in the evaluation of pulmonary hypertension and endothelial function after cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 1993,88(5 Pt 1):2128-2138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Solina A, Papp D, Ginsberg S, Krause T, Grubb W, Scholz P, Pena LL, Cody R: A comparison of inhaled nitric oxide and milrinone for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in adult cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000, 14: 12-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ardehali A, Hughes K, Sadeghi A, Esmailian F, Marelli D, Moriguchi J, Hamilton MA, Kobashigawa J, Laks H: Inhaled nitric oxide for pulmonary hypertension after heart transplantation. Transplantation 2001, 72: 638-641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. King RC, Binns OA, Rodriguez F, Kanithanon RC, Daniel TM, Spotnitz WD, Tribble CG, Kron IL: Reperfusion injury significantly impacts clinical outcome after pulmonary transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000, 69: 1681-1685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. de Perrot M, Liu M, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S: Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167: 490-511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemming GI, Merkel MJ, Schallerer A, Habler OP, Kleen MS, Haller M, Briegel J, Vogelmeier C, Fürst H, Reichart B, Zwissler B: Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) for the treatment of early allograft failure after lung transplantation. Munich Lung Transplant Group. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24: 1173-1180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Meade MO, Granton JT, Matte-Martyn A, McRae K, Weaver B, Cripps P, Keshavjee SH, Toronto Lung Transplant Program: A randomized trial of inhaled nitric oxide to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 167: 1483-1489.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fujita Y, Nishida O, Sobue K, Ito H, Kusama N, Inagaki M, Katsuya H: Nitric oxide inhalation is useful in the management of right ventricular failure caused by myocardial infarction. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1379-1381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Inglessis I, Shin JT, Lepore JJ, Palacios IF, Zapol WM, Bloch KD, Semigran MJ: Hemodynamic effects of inhaled nitric oxide in right ventricular myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44: 793-798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Szold O, Khoury W, Biderman P, Klausner JM, Halpern P, Weinbroum AA: Inhaled nitric oxide improves pulmonary functions following massive pulmonary embolism: a report of four patients and review of the literature. Lung 2006, 184: 1-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Siddiqui AK, Ahmed S: Pulmonary manifestations of sickle cell disease. Postgrad Med J 2003, 79: 384-390.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Reiter CD, Gladwin MT: An emerging role for nitric oxide in sickle cell disease vascular homeostasis and therapy. Curr Opin Hematol 2003, 10: 99-107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gladwin MT, Vichinsky E: Pulmonary complications of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 2008, 359: 2254-2265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Gladwin MT, Schechter AN: Nitric oxide therapy in sickle cell disease. Semin Hematol 2001, 38: 333-342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Atz AM, Wessel DL: Inhaled nitric oxide in sickle cell disease with acute chest syndrome. Anesthesiology 1997, 87: 988-990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sullivan KJ, Goodwin SR, Evangelist J, Moore RD, Mehta P: Nitric oxide successfully used to treat acute chest syndrome of sickle cell disease in a young adolescent. Crit Care Med 1999, 27: 2563-2568.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Al Hajeri A, Serjeant GR, Fedorowicz Z: Inhaled nitric oxide for acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, (1):CD006957.Google Scholar
  47. Bigatello LM, Stelfox HT, Hess D: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults – opinions and evidence. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31: 1014-1016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Dellinger RP, Zimmerman JL, Taylor RW, Straube RC, Hauser DL, Criner GJ, Davis K Jr, Hyers TM, Papadakos P: Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group. Crit Care Med 1998, 26: 15-23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Michael JR, Barton RG, Saffle JR, Mone M, Markewitz BA, Hillier K, Elstad MR, Campbell EJ, Troyer BE, Whatley RE, Liou TG, Samuelson WM, Carveth HJ, Hinson DM, Morris SE, Davis BL, Day RW: Inhaled nitric oxide versus conventional therapy: effect on oxygenation in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998,157(5 Pt 1):1372-1380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Troncy E, Collet JP, Shapiro S, Guimond JG, Blair L, Ducruet T, Francoeur M, Charbonneau M, Blaise G: Inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998,157(5 Pt 1):1483-1488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lundin S, Mang H, Smithies M, Stenqvist O, Frostell C: Inhalation of nitric oxide in acute lung injury: results of a European multicentre study. The European Study Group of Inhaled Nitric Oxide. Intensive Care Med 1999, 25: 911-919.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Park KJ, Lee YJ, Oh YJ, Lee KS, Sheen SS, Hwang SC: Combined effects of inhaled nitric oxide and a recruitment maneuver in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Yonsei Med J 2003, 44: 219-226.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor RW, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP, Straube RC, Criner GJ, Davis K Jr, Kelly KM, Smith TC, Small RJ, Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group: Low-dose inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute lung injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 291: 1603-1609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© BioMed Central Ltd 2009