Open Access

Persistently high venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide differences during early resuscitation are associated with poor outcomes in septic shock

  • Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón1, 2Email author,
  • Diego F Bautista-Rincón1,
  • Mauricio Umaña1,
  • José D Tafur1,
  • Alejandro Gutiérrez1,
  • Alberto F García1,
  • William Bermúdez2,
  • Marcela Granados1,
  • César Arango-Dávila2 and
  • Glenn Hernández3
Critical Care201317:R294

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13160

Received: 19 June 2013

Accepted: 21 October 2013

Published: 13 December 2013

Abstract

Introduction

Venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pv-aCO2) may reflect the adequacy of blood flow during shock states. We sought to test whether the development of Pv-aCO2 during the very early phases of resuscitation is related to multi-organ dysfunction and outcomes in a population of septic shock patients resuscitated targeting the usual oxygen-derived and hemodynamic parameters.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study in a 60-bed mixed ICU in a University affiliated Hospital. 85 patients with a new septic shock episode were included. A Pv-aCO2 value ≥ 6 mmHg was considered to be high. Patients were classified in four predefined groups according to the Pv-aCO2 evolution during the first 6 hours of resuscitation: (1) persistently high Pv-aCO2 (high at T0 and T6); (2) increasing Pv-aCO2 (normal at T0, high at T6); (3) decreasing Pv-aCO2 (high at T0, normal at T6); and (4) persistently normal Pv-aCO2 (normal at T0 and T6). Multiorgan dysfunction at day-3 was compared for predefined groups and a Kaplan Meier curve was constructed to show the survival probabilities at day-28 using a log-rank test to evaluate differences between groups. A Spearman-Rho was used to test the agreement between cardiac output and Pv-aCO2. Finally, we calculated the mortality risk ratios at day-28 among patients attaining normal oxygen parameters but with a concomitantly increased Pv-aCO2.

Results

Patients with persistently high and increasing Pv-aCO2 at T6 had significant higher SOFA scores at day-3 (p < 0.001) and higher mortality rates at day-28 (log rank test: 19.21, p < 0.001) compared with patients who evolved with normal Pv-aCO2 at T6. Interestingly, a poor agreement between cardiac output and Pv-aCO2 was observed (r2 = 0.025, p < 0.01) at different points of resuscitation. Patients who reached a central venous saturation (ScvO)2 ≥ 70% or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) ≥ 65% but with concomitantly high Pv-aCO2 at different developmental points (i.e., T0, T6 and T12) had a significant mortality risk ratio at day-28.

Conclusion

The persistence of high Pv-aCO2 during the early resuscitation of septic shock was associated with more severe multi-organ dysfunction and worse outcomes at day-28. Although mechanisms conducting to increase Pv-aCO2 during septic shock are insufficiently understood, Pv-aCO2 could identify a high risk of death in apparently resuscitated patients.

Introduction

Inadequate tissue perfusion is a pivotal factor in the pathogenesis and clinical course of multiorgan failure in the critically ill [1]. Current techniques for monitoring tissue perfusion have largely focused on systemic blood flow and the balance between oxygen demand and supply [2, 3]. An early hemodynamic optimization that targets central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and systemic hemodynamic parameters improves outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock [4], reinforcing the idea that tissue perfusion abnormalities are flow dependent at least during the very early stages. However, normalizing systemic hemodynamic parameters does not guarantee adequate tissue perfusion [57], and in fact a substantial number of patients still progress to multiorgan dysfunction and death despite meeting ScvO2 targets [4].

In the past, authors described the coexistence of venous acidemia and increased venous carbon dioxide (CO2) during cardiac arrest in both animals [8] and critically ill humans [9]. Thereafter, increases in the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pv-aCO2) were reported during hypovolemic, cardiogenic, obstructive, and septic shock [1012]. Interestingly, an inverse curvilinear relationship between Pv-aCO2 and cardiac output was described, highlighting the importance of blood flow on venous CO2 accumulation [13, 14]. Pv-aCO2 thus aroused clinical interest as a marker of global perfusion during shock states, although some studies questioned its prognostic value [14]. In fact, some in vivo models evaluating the mechanisms conducting to venous CO2 accumulation during non-inflammatory conditions [1517] challenged the ability of Pv-aCO2 to identify tissue dysoxia because it only rises during ischemic hypoxia, but not during hypoxic or anemic hypoxia for comparable declines in oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption. However, more recent data suggest that high Pv-aCO2 could identify septic patients who remain inadequately resuscitated despite achieving oxygen metabolism targets, reinforcing the notion of Pv-aCO2 as a marker of global perfusion due to its ability to track blood flow alterations [18] or even detect anaerobic CO2 generation [19]. Furthermore, patterns of recovery or derangement of Pv-aCO2 during very early stages of resuscitation of septic shock have not been widely described and recent studies trying to demonstrate the reliability of Pv-aCO2 as a tool in resuscitation of septic patients could have been influenced by selection bias because not all potential patients were elected to catheter insertion and goal-directed therapy [20, 21].

Recent publications in critical care demonstrate that oxygen-derived parameters such as ScvO2 or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) are commonly normalized at ICU admission [22] and maneuvers such as emergent intubation can quickly improve ScvO2 despite regional and tissue perfusion derangements [23]. Because global and regional hypoperfusion have been incriminated in the development of multiple organ failure, investigation on surrogate markers of such phenomenon remains important in critical care. Given that Pv-aCO2 can track the adequacy of systemic perfusion during shock states, we sought to test whether the time course of Pv-aCO2 during the early phases of resuscitation is related to the development of more severe multiorgan dysfunction and worse outcomes in a population of septic shock patients resuscitated by targeting the usual oxygen-derived and hemodynamic parameters.

Materials and methods

This prospective observational study was performed in a 60-bed mixed ICU in a university-affiliated hospital. We examined all patients with a new septic shock episode admitted to the emergency room or proceeding from clinical wards during a 24-month period. Septic shock was defined using the criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference [24]. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years old, pregnant, had severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD 3 and 4 categories according to the current classification at the time of our study) or advanced liver cirrhosis (Child–Pugh C).

General management

All patients admitted to the emergency room or proceeding from clinical wards who fulfilled the diagnosis criteria for septic shock were evaluated by the ICU rapid response team according to our local procedures. Each patient was equipped with an arterial cannula and a pulmonary artery catheter (CCO Swan–Ganz catheter; Edwards Life sciences, Irvine, CA, USA). Our early goal-directed therapy included a bundle of interventions that sought to obtain: mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg; urine output ≥0.5 ml/kg/minute; normalization of serum lactate; and ScvO2 ≥70% or SvO2 ≥65%. The use of vasopressors (dopamine or norepinephrine) was standardized to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg, and repeated fluid challenges with crystalloids or colloids were used to optimize the stroke volume as well as to allow the lowest dose of vasopressors and pulse-pressure variability <12%. Dobutamine was added for persistent ScvO2 ≤70% or SvO2 ≤65% after fluid resuscitation. A low dose of hydrocortisone was given within 6 hours of resuscitation when use of vasopressors persisted after an adequate fluid restitution. Mechanical ventilation was provided when needed under light sedation (midazolam) and analgesia (fentanyl); the tidal volume was limited to 6 to 8 ml/kg. Glycemic control was adjusted to maintain glucose levels <150 mg/dl. Finally, stress ulcer and venous thrombosis prophylaxis were provided according to international recommendations [25].

Study protocol

The Fundación Valle del Lili’s Ethical and Biomedical research committee approved the current study. A written informed consent was waived because no new therapeutic interventions were performed and all measurements and procedures routinely followed the local protocols for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Time 0 (T0) was declared when the pulmonary artery catheter was inserted using common monitoring tracings to place the distal port in the pulmonary artery and the proximal port in the right atrium, approximately 3 cm above the tricuspid valve. In order to standardize T0, we recorded the total volume of fluids administered and the time elapsed between the start of resuscitation (first hypotension episode) and the pulmonary artery catheter insertion (T0).

We collected arterial venous blood samples and central and mixed venous blood samples for arterial–venous gases (ABL 300; Radiometer Copenhagen, Denmark) and arterial lactate measurements at T0, and 6 hours (T6), 12 hours (T12) and 24 hours (T24) later. We simultaneously registered hemodynamic and respiratory variables at each measurement. We defined Pv-aCO2 as the difference between the mixed venous CO2 partial pressure and the arterial CO2 partial pressure. Previous studies considered Pv-aCO2 ≥6 mmHg abnormal [14]. Hence, we classified the patients according to the Pva-CO2 development during the first 6 hours of resuscitation: persistently high Pv-aCO2 (high at T0 and T6); increasing Pv-aCO2 (normal at T0, high at T6); decreasing Pv-aCO2 (high at T0, normal at T6); and persistently normal Pv-aCO2 (normal at T0 and T6). The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score [26] was used to describe multiorgan dysfunction at day 3 and we also described mortality at day 28 for the pre-defined groups.

Data analysis

After exclusion of a normal distribution of the data by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, we used a Kruskal–Wallis test to compare continuous variables (followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons) and a chi-squared test (or Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate) for discrete variables. Survival probabilities at day 28 were described using a Kaplan–Meier curve and differences between groups were calculated using a log-rank test before and after adjusting for SvO2 at T6. The development of SvO2, ScvO2, lactate, cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and Pv-aCO2 during the first 24 hours were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Spearman’s rho was used to test the agreement between cardiac output and Pv-aCO2. We also calculated the mortality risk ratios at day 28 in patients who attained ScvO2 ≥70% or SvO2 ≥65% but maintained persistently high Pv-aCO2 at different points during resuscitation (T0, T6, and T12). Data were expressed as medians and 25 to 75% interquartile ranges. P ≤0.05 (two-tailed) was considered significant.

Results

During the 24-month period, 108 patients older than 18 years with a new episode of septic shock were screened. Patients with advanced cirrhosis (n = 4), patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 8) and pregnant women (n = 4) were not included for analysis; additionally, a central catheter could not be placed in four patients, and three refused the procedure. The final sample was therefore 85 patients. The median length of ICU stay for all patients was 6 days (25 to 75% interquartile range, 3 to 11 days), and the 28-day mortality rate was 37.6%. The median time elapsed from sepsis-induced hypotension to catheter insertion was 3.0 hours (25 to 75% interquartile range, 1.0 to 4.0 hours) and the median volume of fluids received before catheter insertion was 2,079 ml (25 to 75% interquartile range, 1,184 to 3,135 ml) for all patients.

Thirty-six patients had Pv-aCO2 <6.0 mmHg at T0 and T6, and 17 patients had a high PvaCO2 at T0 but it fell below 6 mmHg at T6 (a total of 53 patients had Pv-aCO2 <6 mmHg at T6); on the other hand, 24 patients had a persistently high Pv-aCO2 during the first 6 hours and the remaining eight evolved from normal at T0 to high PvaCO2 at T6 (32 patients had Pv-aCO2 ≥6 mmHg at T6).

We did not find any significant difference with regard to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, comorbidities, demographics, or respiratory and hemodynamic variables between groups (Tables 1 and 2), and neither for the volume of fluids received before inclusion (T0). Doses of vasopressors or inotropic received were similar for the groups both at T0 and T6 (Table 2). Multiorgan dysfunction at day 3 was significantly higher among patients with persistently high Pv-aCO2 compared with those with persistently normal or decreasing Pv-aCO2 during the first 6 hours of resuscitation (Kruskal–Wallis test, P <0.001) (Figure 1). Likewise, patients with persistently high Pv-aCO2 during the first 6 hours of resuscitation had a significant lower survival at day 28 compared with those who normalized Pv-aCO2 during this period (log-rank, Mantel–Cox: 19.21, P <0.001; Figure 2). These results were maintained after adjusting for the SvO2 achieved at T6 (log-rank test, P <0.001). The time course of SvO2, ScvO2 and cardiac output did not significantly differ between Pv-aCO2 groups (Table 2) nor between survivors and nonsurvivors at day 28 (Figures S1a,b and S2 in Additional file 1). Interestingly, a poor agreement between cardiac output and Pv-aCO2 was observed both at each time of resuscitation and when all data were pooled (r2 = 0.025, P <0.01) (Figure 3; Figure S3 in Additional file 1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Variable

Group 1, H-H

Group 2, L-H

Group 3, H-L

Group 4, L-L

P value

(n= 24)

(n= 8)

(n= 17)

(n= 36)

Age (years)

63.0 (54.7 to 75.0)

63.5 (50.5 to 76.5)

55.0 (53.0 to 76.0)

62.0 (49.3 to 71.8)

0.83

Gender, male (%)

17 (70.8)

4 (50.0)

10 (58.8)

22 (61.1)

0.72

APACHE II

24.4 (21.2 to 26.0)

25.2 (21.0 to 27.0)

23.4 (21.2 to 25.6)

24.8 (22.2 to 25.8)

0.11

Time between diagnosis and catheter insertion (T0)

2.0 (2.0 to 4.0)

1.0 (1.0 to 3.3)

3.0 (1.0 to 4.0)

3.0 (2.0 to 4.0)

0.44

Fluids received before catheter insertion

2,039 (1,343 to 2,834)

1,934 (849 to 4,575)

2,500 (1,430 to 3,628)

2,000 (1,025 to 3,153)

0.76

Temperature (°C)

37.5 (37.2 to 37.9)

37.4 (37.1 to 37.9)

37.6 (37.0 to 38.0)

37.4 (37.4 to 37.8)

0.74

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

9.4 (8.7 to 11.6)

8.8 (7.4 to 11.4)

9.8 (9.1 to 11.4)

9.9 (9.1 to 11.4)

0.47

Source of infection, n (%)

     

 Pneumonia

9

3

4

10

 Abdominal

8

4

6

14

 Urinary

2

1

3

4

 Soft tissue

2

0

1

2

 No specific site

3

0

2

4

 Other

0

0

1

2

Culture positive, n (%)

20 (83.3)

5 (62.5)

12 (70.6)

19 (52.8)

0.11

Antibiotics given at T0, n (%)

24 (100)

7 (87.5)

16 (94.1)

32(88.9)

0.38

Antibiotics adequate, n (%)

23 (95.8)

7 (87.5)

16 (94.1)

27 (75.0)

0.10

Hydrocortisone, n (%)

22 (91.7)

8 (100)

15 (88.2)

31 (86.1)

0.68

Transfusion RBC, n (%)

4 (16.7)

3 (37.5)

3 (17.6)

4 (11.1)

0.35

Fluids and vasoactive agents

Fluids (ml), IQ 25 to 75

     

 T0

2,039 (1,343 to 2,834)

1,934 (849 to 4,575)

2,500 (1,430 to 3,628)

2,000 (1,025 to 3,153)

0.76

 T6

4,733 (3,196 to 6,360)

4,082 (1,576 to 7,584)

4,845 (2,550 to 6,560)

4,673 (3,380 to 7,348)

0.83

Norepinephrine (μg/kg/minute), IQ 25 to 75, n

     

 T0

0.25 (0.19 to 0.36), 24

0.29 (0.14 to 1.20), 6

0.19 (0.10 to 0,37), 16

0.23 (0.10 to 0.38), 30

0.81

 T6

0.20 (0.11 to 0.40), 24

0.36 (0.09 to 0.49), 6

0.12 (0.11 to 0.18), 15

0.19 (0.08 to 0.39), 31

0.45

Dopamine (μg/kg/minute), IQ 25 to 75, n

     

 T0

7.1 (7.1 to 7.3), 2

10.7 (10.7 to 10.7), 1

5.1 (2.8 to 6.6), 5

0.14

 T6

8.0 (8.0 to 8.0), 1

5.3 (2.5 to 6.4), 4

0.16

Dobutamine (μg/kg/minute), IQ 25 to 75, n

     

 T0

3.1 (2.7 to 4.5), 5

5.9 (5.1 to 6.7), 2

3.3 (3.0 to 4.2), 3

0.15

 T6

3.1 (2.7 to 5.6), 3

5.1 (4.7 to 6.3), 4

3.8 (3.3 to 4.8), 3

0.21

H-H, venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pv-aCO2) high at T0 and T6; L-H, Pv-aCO2 normal at T0 and high at T6; H-L, Pv-aCO2 high at T0 and normal at T6; and L-L, Pv-aCO2 normal at T0 and T6. APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; IQ 25 to 75, 25 to 75% interquartile range; RBC, red blood cells; T0, time 0; T6, 6 hours after Time 0.

Table 2

Hemodynamic, oxygen and ventilatory parameters

Variable

Group 1, H-H

Group 2, L-H

Group 3, H-L

Group 4, L-L

P value

(n= 24)

(n= 8)

(n= 17)

(n= 36)

Hemodynamic variables

Heart rate (beats/minute)

     

 T0

112 (103 to 129)

111 (77 to 138)

104 (86 to 126)

109 (93 to 118)

0.31

 T6

114 (101 to 125)

103 (73 to 127)

98 (85 to 114)

103 (88 to 118)

0.14

Cardiac index (l/minute/m2)

     

 T0

3.0 (2.3 to 4.2)

3.6 (2.7 to 4.6)

3.0 (2.5 to 5.0)

3.5 (2.7 to 4.5)

0.63

 T6

3.2 (2.2 to 4.3)

3.3 (2.4 to 3.8)

3.7 (2.2 to 5.5)

3.6 (2.8 to 4.3)

0.75

MAP (mmHg)

     

 T0

65.0 (61.0 to 72.8)**

67.0 (65.3 to 69.5)

73.0 (68.0 to 82.5)**

72.0 (64.5 to 77.0)

0.02

 T6

69.0 (65.3 to 75.8)

77.5 (70.5 to 96.0)

68.0 (63.5 to 72.0)

71.5 (65.0 to 78.8)

0.06

CVP (mmHg)

     

 T0

14.5 (10.3 to 17.0)

10.0 (9.0 to 12.8)

12.0 (8.5 to 15.0)

10.0 (7.0 to 14.0)

0.10

 T6

13.5 (10.0 to 15.8)**

15.0 (10.0 to 17.0)

10.0 (5.0 to 12.5)**

10.0 (7.3 to 13.0)

0.03

PAOP (mmHg)

     

 T0

17.0 (14.0 to 20.0)

12.5 (10.0 to 15.0)

17.0 (12.0 to 22.0)

15.0 (11.0 to 20.0)

0.52

 T6

19.0 (15.0 to 24.0)**

14.5 (10.0 to 19.0)

13.0 (10.0 to 15.0)**

16.0 (12.0 to 20.0)

0.03

Blood gases and oxygen variables

pH

     

 T0

7.30 (7.18 to 7.37)

7.31 (7.22 to 7.40)

7.34 (7.22 to 7.41)

7.32 (7.24 to 7.40)

0.85

 T6

7.32 (7.20 to 7.36)

7.35 (7.30 to 7.42)

7.35 (7.26 to 7.39)

7.34 (7.30 to 7.39)

0.33

PaCO2 (mmHg)

     

 T0

30.5 (24.1 to 36.6)

34.2 (24.7 to 36.9)

31.0 (23.6 to 33.6)

27.5 (23.7 to 36.5)

0.81

 T6

26.1 (22.4 to 32.7)

31.0 (21.6 to 34.0)

31.3 (26.8 to 33.6)

27.5 (21.7 to 32.1)

0.25

PvmCO2 (mmHg)

     

 T0

40.6 (33.9 to 46.5)

29.5 (25.0 to 35.3)

39.7 (35.5 to 47.1) 34.3

32.8 (27.3 to 40.9)

0.03

 T6

38.0 (29.9 to 39.7)

38.3 (28.0 to 46.2)

(30.4 to 36.8)

30.0 (25.5 to 35.5)

0.02

PvcCO2 (mmHg)

     

 T0

38.2 (29.1 to 50.5)

40.1 (34.2 to 43.4)

36.7 (35.5 to 47.1) 33.9

32.5 (28.1 to 38.4)

0.12

 T6

33.7 (28.3 to 36.9)

33.8 (31.4 to 41.4)

(30.4 to 36.8)

29.0 (25.1 to 35.8)

0.20

PaO2 (mmHg)

     

 T0

112.2 (79.3 to 167.3)

117.1 (77.5 to 139.5)

115.7 (81.4 to 140.8)

100 (86.0 to 123.9)

0.70

 T6

113.6 (83.0 to 147.3)

132.5 (109.8 to 197.8)

105.0 (83.5 to 127.4)

111.5 (86.2 to 135.7)

0.34

PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)

     

 T0

188.9 (117.1 to 265.0)

166.9 (143.8 to 244.1)

233.7 (184.6 to 314.0)

214.3 (141.6 to 368.0)

0.28

 T6

177.9 (136.4 to 298.4)

265.0 (185.5 to 383.5)

239.3 (185.1 to 306.3)

253.5 (181.6 to 368.0)

0.17

Lactate (mmol/l)

     

 T0

4.3 (2.0 to 7.9)

2.9 (2.0 to 9.7)

2.7 (1.5 to 3.9)

2.9 (1.7 to 4.7)

0.16

 T6

3.3 (2.1 to 6.8)**

2.9 (1.1 to 7.1)

1.3 (0.9 to 2.3)**

2.0 (1.0 to 3.5)

0.002

ScvO2 (%)

     

 T0

64.0 (54.7 to 75.1)

66.8 (59.7 to 74.5)

73.0 (70.8 to 76.7)

67.1 (62.1 to 75.9)

0.36

 T6

70.8 (66.4 to 73.5)

73.4 (69.3 to 78.0)

72.3 (67.2 to 75.9)

76.0 (60.0 to 77.9)

0.53

SvO2 (%)

     

 T0

66.0 (56.8 to 71.4)

68.0 (54.9 to 81.0)

68.1 (57.0 to 71.0)

69.7 (62.1 to 75.9)

0.39

 T6

69.0 (63.3 to 72.9)

70.6 (63.4 to 73.8)

71.2 (64.4 to 75.1)

68.0 (58.7 to 74.3)

0.77

Oxygen extraction ratio

     

 T0

34.7 (28.3 to 44.3)

30.8 (22.7 to 38.4)

29.4 (25.0 to 36.8)

30.7 (24.9 to 37.5)

0.36

 T6

29.8 (26.4 to 36.6)

30.2 (24.9 to 31.3)

29.3 (24.1 to 33.3)

30.7 (23.4 to 39.3)

0.68

Pv-aCO2 (mmHg)

     

 T0

8.2 (7.0 to 10.6)*

1.4 (1.1 to 5.3)*φ

6.3 (6.1 to 7.2)φξ

2.7 (2.0 to 4.0) ξ

<0.001

 T6

7.6 (6.4 to 9.4)**

8.6 (6.5 to 11.7)φΨ

3.5 (0.9 to 4.3)**φ

3.3 (2.2 to 4.1) Ψ

<0.001

Pvc-aCO2 (mmHg)

     

 T0

9.7 (7.0 to 12.1)

4.6 (3.3 to 6.1)

7.3 (4.6 to 9.1)

4.4 (2.7 to 5.4)

<0.001

 T6

7.0 (5.8 to 9.7)

8.5 (5.6 to 9.6)Ψ

4.4 (2.1 to 5.5)

4.0 (1.7 to 5.4)Ψ

0.003

Ventilatory parameters

Mechanical ventilation

     

 T0

24

5

11

23

0.01

 T6

24

5

11

23

0.01

PEEP (mmHg), n

  

5.0 (5.0 to 8.0), 11

6.0 (5.0 to 8.0), 23

0.48

 T0

6.0 (5.0 to 8.0), 24

5.0 (5.0 to 6.0), 5

5.0 (5.0 to 8.0), 11

8.0 (5.0 to 10.0), 23

 

 T6

6.5 (5.0 to 8.0), 24

5.0 (5.0 to 7.5), 5

   

Tidal volume (ml/kg)

     

 T0

7.1 (6.3 to 7.7)

7.3 (6.3 to 7.6), 5

7.0 (6.5 to 8.0), 11

7.5 (6.6 to 8.0), 23

0.65

 T6

7.2 (6.3 to 7.9)

7.2 (6.6 to 7.6), 5

7.5 (6.8 to 8.0), 11

7.5 (6.9 to 8.0), 23

0.65

Data presented as mean (25 to 75% interquartile range). CVP, central venous pressure; FiO2, oxygen inspired fraction; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PaCO2, arterial carbon dioxyde pressure; PaO2, arterial oxygen pressure; PAOP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; Pv-aCO 2 , mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference; Pvc-aCO 2 , central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference; PvcCO 2 , central venous carbon dioxide pressure; PvmCO 2 , mixed venous carbon dioxide pressure; ScvO 2 , central venous oxygen saturation; SvO 2 , mixed venous oxygen saturation; T0, time 0; T6, 6 hours after Time 0. *P <0.05 for Groups 1 vs. 2; **P <0.05 for Groups 1 vs. 3; P <0.05 for Groups 1 vs. 4; φP <0.05 for Groups 2 vs. 3; ΨP <0.05 for Groups 2 vs. 4; and ξP <0.05 for Groups 3 vs. 4.

Figure 1

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores at day 3 by the early development (first 6 hours) of mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference. Kruskal–Wallis test, P <0.001. **Significant differences between persistently high mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pv-aCO2) and low Pv-aCO2 group; and between persistently high Pv-aCO2 and decreasing Pv-aCO2 group after Bonferroni correction. H-H, Pv-aCO2 high at Time 0 (T0) and 6 hours later (T6); L-H, Pv-aCO2 normal at T0 and high at T6; H-L, Pv-aCO2 high at T0 and normal at T6; and L-L, Pv-aCO2 normal at T0 and T6. SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Figure 2

Survival probabilities at day 28 by the development of mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference during the first 6 hours of resuscitation. Log-rank, Mantel–Cox: 19.21, P <0.001. H-H, mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pv-aCO2) high at Time 0 (T0) and 6 hours later (T6); L-H, Pv-aCO2 normal at T0 and high at T6; H-L, Pv-aCO2 high at T0 and normal at T6; and L-L, Pv-aCO2 normal at T0 and T6.

Figure 3

Scatter plot between cardiac index and mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference. All patients at Time 0 (T0) and 6 hours (T6), 12 hours (T12) and 24 hours (T24) later. Pearson correlation: 0.16; r2 = 0.025; P <0.01. CI, confidence interval; Pv-aCO2, mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference.

Patients with elevated Pv-aCO2 at T6 had slower lactate clearances at T6 and T12 than patients attaining a normal Pv-aCO2 during the first 6 hours of resuscitation (Figure 4). We also observed a significant linear correlation between mixed-venous to arterial pCO2 and central-venous to arterial pCO2 (Pearson correlation: 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.86; P <0.001) but with moderate agreement between them (R2 = 0.556, P <0.001) (Figure 5). Additionally, significant differences were observed for the time course of Pv-aCO2 and central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pvc-aCO2) during the first 24 hours for survivor and nonsurvivors at day 28 (repeated-measures analysis of variance, P = 0.003 and P = 0.03, respectively; Figure S4a,b in Additional file 1).
Figure 4

Lactate clearance (%) 6 and 12 hours after Time 0 for patients with normal or high mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference at 6 hours. Significant differences for lactate clearance (Time 0 (T0) to 6 hours later (T6) and T0 to 12 hours later (T12)) between patients with persistently high (that is, high-to-high and normal-to-high groups) and normalized mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference at T6 (high-to-normal and persistently low groups). A negative percent clearance indicates a reduction in lactate levels. Black bars: High Pv-aCO2 at T6; Gray bars: Low Pv-aCO2 at T6.

Figure 5

Correlation between mixed venous carbon dioxide pressure and central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference. Scatter plot representing the mixed-venous to arterial carbon dioxide (Pvm-aCO2) difference versus the central-venous to arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pvc-aCO2). Pearson correlation: 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.86); R2 = 0.55, P <0.001.

Finally, patients who achieved ScvO2?≥?70% or SvO2?≥?65% but maintained high Pv-aCO2 at T0, T6 and T12 had a higher mortality risk at Day 28 (Table 3).
Table 3

Mortality risk ratio for patients with mixed oxygen saturation ≥65% but with mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference ≥6 mmHg at day 28

Time

Relative riska

Confidence interval

P value

0 hours

1.77

0.97–3.22

0.06

6 hours

2.23

1.20–4.13

0.01

12 hours

2.41

1.42–4.10

0.001

a R elative mortality risk at day 28.

Discussion

We studied a cohort of patients during the very early phases of septic shock who were subjected to a comprehensive resuscitation aimed to target the usual hemodynamic and oxygen metabolism parameters. A recent study demonstrated how Pv-aCO2 could be a tool to detect persistent inadequate resuscitation during septic shock [18] although it was not conducted during very early stages of resuscitation. Even a faster enrollment, our study showed that a number of patients had approximately normal SvO2 and ScvO2 at catheter insertion as it has been reported at ICU admission [22], and most of them reached normal oxygen-derived parameters at 6 hours. However, despite attaining the SvO2 and ScvO2 targets (and after adjusting for SvO2) and an apparent global hemodynamic normalization in most patients, those with persistently high Pv-aCO2 developed more severe multiorgan dysfunction at day 3 than patients evolving with normal Pv-aCO2 during the first 6 hours of resuscitation or those who evolved from high to normal PvaCO2. Additionally, we observed that persistently high Pv-aCO2 was associated with a lower survival at day 28.

Venous hypercarbia is a marker of limited blood flow during cardiac arrest and shock states [819]. Recent observations have suggested that Pv-aCO2 might identify septic patients who remain inadequately resuscitated despite achieving ScvO2 goals [15]. Consistent with these findings, we found that patients in septic shock achieving ScvO2 ≥70% or SvO2 ≥65% had worse outcomes when a concomitant high Pv-aCO2 was observed. These data reinforce the idea that Pv-aCO2 provides additional information to hemodynamic and oxygen parameters habitually used during resuscitation of septic shock. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms that explain increases in Pv-aCO2 during septic shock are incompletely understood; however, to current knowledge, an increased Pv-aCO2 results from the interactions between blood flow to the tissues, aerobic and anaerobic CO2 generation, and the CO2 dissociation curve.

According to the Fick equation, during steady state the CO2 excretion equals the product of cardiac output by the difference between mixed venous blood CO2 content and arterial blood CO2 content. Some studies have emphasized on the key role of cardiac output on venous to arterial CO2 content differences and indeed a curvilinear relationship between these two variables has been described [14]. However, in our study we found a poorer concordance between cardiac output and Pv-aCO2 at each time point of resuscitation (Figure 3) and, in fact, the cardiac output remained normal or even high during the first 24 hours of resuscitation (Figure S2 in Additional file 1), suggesting some independence between Pv-aCO2 and macrovascular blood flow changes. While in non-inflammatory low-flow states tissue and regional hypercarbia can be easily explained by the CO2 stagnation phenomenon [15, 16], the interpretation of an increased tissue and/or regional CO2 during inflammatory conditions is more complex. Sepsis may thereby be associated with the coexistence of normal or even high cardiac output, inter-organ and intra-organ blood flow redistribution, and altered microvascular and oxygen extraction capabilities. All of these alterations can influence the tissue CO2 production and elimination.

A study by Neviere and colleagues thus demonstrated the key role of microvascular blood flow on gastric CO2 accumulation [27]. Similarly, using simultaneous gastric tonometry and laser Doppler flowmetry, Elizalde and colleagues demonstrated the association between gastric mucosal pH and mucosal blood flow, regardless of macrohemodynamic variations [28]. Likewise, Tugtekin and colleagues demonstrated in a porcine sepsis model that the increase of mucosal to arterial CO2 gap was related to the heterogeneity of gut mucosal blood flow, even though cardiac output and mesenteric blood flow were maintained [29]. Meanwhile, Creteur and colleagues found a significant correlation among sublingual CO2, gastric mucosal CO2 and microcirculatory heterogeneity in human septic shock during dobutamine infusion, and suggested that the primary determinant of tissue CO2 accumulation was the microcirculatory blood flow [30]. Hence, there is an evident link between blood flow and tissue or local CO2 accumulations conducting to increase tissue or venous-to-arterial CO2 differences, but sometimes normal macrohemodynamics does not prevent elevation of Pv-aCO2. The near normalization of the oxygen and hemodynamic parameters between the subgroups in our study suggests that venous CO2 accumulation encloses more complex mechanisms than macrovascular stagnation, and we could hypothesize that microvascular blood flow distribution is one of several factors potentially influencing the behavior of Pv-aCO2 during inflammatory conditions in which the heterogeneity of microvascular blood flow is increased. However, this hypothesis should be confirmed in future studies.

The interpretation of hyperlactatemia in sepsis is very complex, especially in septic shock [31] since anaerobic metabolism, non-anaerobic generation and slow clearance can conduct lactate accumulation. We observed higher lactate levels and slower lactate clearance at T6 and T12 in patients with persistently high Pv-aCO2 during the first 6 hours of resuscitation. Interestingly, Pv-aCO2 (and Pvc-aCO2) kinetics seems to anticipate a slower lactate clearance (Figure S5 in Additional file 1). A high Pv-aCO2 could indicate a decrease in global or microvascular blood flow conducting to slow lactate clearance. However, a high Pv-aCO2 could also reflect the persistence of anaerobic metabolism as result of bicarbonate buffering of protons derived from fixed acids [32]. Thus, an increased Pv-aCO2 to oxygen consumption ratio could reflect global anaerobic metabolism as was proposed by Mekontso-Dessap and colleagues [19]. However, even in the presence of anaerobic metabolism, a high efferent venous blood flow could be sufficient to wash out the global CO2 generation from the hypoperfused peripheral tissues and, in this case, Pv-aCO2 could not increase. In fact, hypoperfusion could persist in some of our patients and even oxygen parameters, global hemodynamics or Pv-aCO2 remain normal.

Finally, we found a significant linear correlation but moderate agreement between venous–arterial CO2 differences obtained from mixed venous and central venous samples that agree with recent observations published simultaneously to the review of our paper [21]. Even though Pvc-aCO2 can be easily obtained and speedily usable in the emergency room, the point about whether Pvc-aCO2 and mixed venous carbon dioxide pressure (Pv-aCO2 in our study) are really interchangeable should be addressed in future studies.

Our study has some limitations. First, our observations are restricted to macro-hemodynamic variables, and Pv-aCO2 is another global variable that does not necessarily represent tissue or regional vascular perfusion at different beds. We did not describe regional perfusion variables as gastric tonometry or local tissue CO2 accumulation; hence, normal Pv-aCO2 might also occur when regional hypoperfusion is ongoing.

Second, we suggest that persistently high Pv-aCO2 reflects tissue or regional hypoperfusion. We hypothesized that Pv-aCO2 could reflect the venous CO2 accumulation due to the heterogeneous microcirculatory blood flow when cardiac output and oxygen parameters remain normal or even high or, eventually, Pv-aCO2 could reflect anaerobic CO2 generation. However, mechanism conducting to venous CO2 accumulation during inflammatory conditions should be explored in future studies.

Third, during conditions of tissue hypoxia but with preserved blood flow (even though during anaerobic metabolism carbon dioxide production - VCO2 - decreases less than oxygen consumption -VO2-), venous blood flow might be high enough to ensure adequate washout of the CO2 produced by hypoxic cells, thereby preventing a Pv-aCO2 increase.

Fourth, we assumed that a linear relationship exist between partial CO2 pressure and CO2 content at the venous and arterial levels [33, 34]. Pv-aCO2 could thus be used as a surrogate for the Cv-aCO2. However, previous research has shown that the Haldane effect causes paradoxical increases in Pv-aCO2 during blood flow increases [33, 34]. Unfortunately, the calculation of CO2 content is complex and subject to errors due to the number of variables included in the formulas. Simplified formulas are easy to use, but wide differences in venous and arterial acid–base status (for example, ischemic hypoxia) can preclude their use. Nevertheless, some authors consider that the Haldane effect exerts a minor influence, and in most cases Pv-aCO2 and CO2 content differences develop similarly [35].

Finally, our observations were restricted to a small sample of patients in septic shock. Although our findings seem logical and biologically plausible, they should be confirmed in future studies.

Conclusions

The persistence of high Pv-aCO2 during the early resuscitation of patients in septic shock is associated with significant higher multiorgan dysfunction and poor outcomes. Although underlying mechanisms that increase Pv-aCO2 among patients in septic shock must be clarified, Pv-aCO2 might identify a high risk of death in apparently resuscitated patients. Future studies should test Pv-aCO2 as a perfusion goal during early phases of the resuscitation of patients in septic shock.

Key messages

  • Persistent high Pv-aCO2 is related to more severe multiorgan dysfunction and worse outcomes in apparently resuscitated septic shock patients.

  • Mechanisms conducting to increase Pv-aCO2 during inflammatory conditions are insufficiently understood. Variations in Pv-aCO2 were independent of macro-flow variables (that is, cardiac output) or oxygen metabolism targets (that is, SvO2, oxygen extraction rate), suggesting that venous stagnation is not the single explanation for venous CO2 accumulation.

  • Pv-aCO2 might identify a high risk of death in apparently resuscitated septic shock patients, and could be explored as a tissue perfusion goal during resuscitation as Pv-aCO2 tracks ischemic hypoxia.

Abbreviations

CO2: 

Carbon dioxide

Pv-aCO2: 

Mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference

Pvc-aCO2: 

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference

ScvO2: 

Central venous oxygen saturation

SvO2: 

Mixed venous oxygen saturation.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Magda Cepeda (Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia), Dr Oscar Ramírez W (Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia) and Dr Yoseth Ariza (Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia) for their contributions to the statistical analyses.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Intensive Care Unit, Fundación Valle del Lili
(2)
Biomedica Research Group, Universidad ICESI
(3)
Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

References

  1. Beal AL, Cerra FB: Multiple organ failure syndrome in the, 1990’s. Systemic inflammatory response and organ dysfunction. JAMA 1990, 1994: 226-233.Google Scholar
  2. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB: Tissue oxygen debt as a determinant of lethal and nonlethal postoperative organ failure. Crit Care Med 1988, 16: 1117-1120. 10.1097/00003246-198811000-00007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vallet B: Vascular reactivity and tissue oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24: 3-11. 10.1007/s001340050507View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Eng J Med 2001, 345: 1368-1377. 10.1056/NEJMoa010307View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Third European Consensus Conference in Intensive Care Medicine: Tissue hypoxia: How to detect, how to correct, how to prevent. Societe de reanimation de langue francaise. The American thoracic society. European society of intensive care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996, 154: 1573-1578.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Russell JA, Phang PT: The oxygen delivery/consumption controversy. Approaches to management of the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149: 533-537. 10.1164/ajrccm.149.2.8306058View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Marik PE, Bankov A: Sublingual capnometry versus traditional markers of tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2003, 31: 818-822. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054862.74829.EAView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grundler W, Weil MH, Rackow EC: Arteriovenous carbon dioxide and pH gradients during cardiac arrest. Circulation 1986, 74: 1071-1074. 10.1161/01.CIR.74.5.1071View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weil MH, Rackow EC, Trevino R, Grundler W, Falk JL, Griffel MI: Difference in acid–base state between venous and arterial blood during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 1986, 315: 153-156. 10.1056/NEJM198607173150303View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mecher CE, Rackow EC, Astiz ME, Weil MH: Venous hypercarbia associated with severe sepsis and systemic hypoperfusion. Crit Care Med 1990, 18: 585-589. 10.1097/00003246-199006000-00001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Adrogue HJ, Rashad MN, Gorin AB, Yacoub J, Madias NE: Assessing acid–base status in circulatory failure. Differences between arterial and central venous blood. N Engl J Med 1989, 320: 1312-1316. 10.1056/NEJM198905183202004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kazarian KK, Del Guercio LR: The use of mixed venous blood gas determinations in traumatic shock. Ann Emerg Med 1980, 9: 179-182. 10.1016/S0196-0644(80)80002-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Teboul JL, Mercat A, Lenique F, Berton C, Richard C: Value of the venous–arterial PCO2 gradient to reflect the oxygen supply to demand in humans: effects of dobutamine. Crit Care Med 1998, 26: 1007-1010. 10.1097/00003246-199806000-00017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bakker J, Vincent JL, Gris P, Leon M, Coffernils M, Kahn RJ: Veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient in human septic shock. Chest 1992, 101: 509-515. 10.1378/chest.101.2.509View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vallet B, Teboul JL, Cain S, Curtis S: Venoarterial CO(2) difference during regional ischemic or hypoxic hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 2000, 89: 1317-1321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Neviere R, Chagnon JL, Teboul JL, Vallet B, Wattel F: Small intestine intramucosal PCO(2) and microvascular blood flow during hypoxic and ischemic hypoxia. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 379-384. 10.1097/00003246-200202000-00019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubin A, Estenssoro E, Murias G, Pozo MO, Sottile JP, Baran M, Piacentini E, Canales HS, Etcheverry G: Intramucosal-arterial Pco2 gradient does not reflect intestinal dysoxia in anemic hypoxia. J Trauma 2004, 57: 1211-1217. 10.1097/01.TA.0000107182.43213.4BView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vallee F, Vallet B, Mathe O, Parraguette J, Mari A, Silva S, Samii K, Fourcade O, Genestal M: Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference: an additional target for goal-directed therapy in septic shock? Intensive Care Med 2008, 34: 2218-2225. 10.1007/s00134-008-1199-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mekontso-Dessap A, Castelain V, Anguel N, Bahloul M, Schauvliege F, Richard C, Teboul JL: Combination of venoarterial PCO2 difference with arteriovenous O2 content difference to detect anaerobic metabolism in patients. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28: 272-277. 10.1007/s00134-002-1215-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. van Beest PA, van Ingen J, Boerma EC, Holman ND, Groen H, Koopmans M, Spronk PE, Kuiper MA: No agreement of mixed venous and central venous saturation in sepsis, independent of sepsis origin. Crit Care Med 2010, 14: R219.Google Scholar
  21. van Beest PA, Lont MC, Holman ND, Loef B, Kuiper MA, Boerma EC: Central venous–arterial pCO(2) difference as a tool in resuscitation of septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2013, 39: 1034-1039. 10.1007/s00134-013-2888-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. van Beest PA, Hofstra JJ, Schultz MJ, Boerma EC, Spronk PE, Kuiper MA: The incidence of low venous oxygen saturation on admission to the intensive care unit: a multi-center observational study in The Netherlands. Crit Care Med 2008, 12: R33.Google Scholar
  23. Hernandez G, Pena H, Cornejo R, Rovegno M, Retamal J, Navarro JL, Aranguiz I, Castro R, Bruhn A: Impact of emergency intubation on central venous oxygen saturation in critically ill patients: a multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med 2009, 13: R63.Google Scholar
  24. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G: SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med 2001, 2003: 1250-1256.Google Scholar
  25. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, et al.: Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008, 36: 296-327. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S: Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on ‘sepsis-related problems’ of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 1998, 26: 1793-1800. 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Neviere R, Mathieu D, Chagnon JL, Lebleu N, Wattel F: The contrasting effects of dobutamine and dopamine on gastric mucosal perfusion in septic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996, 154: 1684-1688. 10.1164/ajrccm.154.6.8970355View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Elizalde JI, Hernandez C, Llach J, Monton C, Bordas JM, Pique JM, Torres A: Gastric intramucosal acidosis in mechanically ventilated patients: role of mucosal blood flow. Crit Care Med 1998, 26: 827-832. 10.1097/00003246-199805000-00011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tugtekin IF, Radermacher P, Theisen M, Matejovic M, Stehr A, Ploner F, Matura K, Ince C, Georgieff M, Trager K: Increased ileal-mucosal-arterial PCO2 gap is associated with impaired villus microcirculation in endotoxic pigs. Intensive Care Med 2001, 27: 757-766. 10.1007/s001340100871View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Creteur J, De Backer D, Sakr Y, Koch M, Vincent JL: Sublingual capnometry tracks microcirculatory changes in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2006, 32: 516-523. 10.1007/s00134-006-0070-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. De Backer D: Lactic acidosis. Intensive Care Med 2003, 29: 699-702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Raza O, Schlichtig R: Metabolic component of intestinal PCO(2) during dysoxia. J Appl Physiol 2000, 89: 2422-2429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jakob SM, Kosonen P, Ruokonen E, Parviainen I, Takala J: The Haldane effect – an alternative explanation for increasing gastric mucosal PCO2 gradients? Br J Anaesth 1999, 83: 740-746. 10.1093/bja/83.5.740View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hurley R, Mythen MG: The Haldane effect – an explanation for increasing gastric mucosal PCO2 gradients? Br J Anaesth 2000, 85: 167-169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schlichtig R, Bowles SA: Distinguishing between aerobic and anaerobic appearance of dissolved CO2 in intestine during low flow. J Appl Physiol 1994, 76: 2443-2451.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ospina-Tascón et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.