Skip to main content

Effects of ventilation strategy on distribution of lung inflammatory cell activity

Abstract

Introduction

Leukocyte infiltration is central to the development of acute lung injury, but it is not known how mechanical ventilation strategy alters the distribution or activation of inflammatory cells. We explored how protective (vs. injurious) ventilation alters the magnitude and distribution of lung leukocyte activation following systemic endotoxin administration.

Methods

Anesthetized sheep received intravenous endotoxin (10 ng/kg/min) followed by 2 h of either injurious or protective mechanical ventilation (n = 6 per group). We used positron emission tomography to obtain images of regional perfusion and shunting with infused 13N[nitrogen]-saline and images of neutrophilic inflammation with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). The Sokoloff model was used to quantify 18F-FDG uptake (Ki), as well as its components: the phosphorylation rate (k3, a surrogate of hexokinase activity) and the distribution volume of 18F-FDG (Fe) as a fraction of lung volume (Ki = Fe × k3). Regional gas fractions (fgas) were assessed by examining transmission scans.

Results

Before endotoxin administration, protective (vs. injurious) ventilation was associated with a higher ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) (351 ± 117 vs. 255 ± 74 mmHg; P < 0.01) and higher whole-lung fgas (0.71 ± 0.12 vs. 0.48 ± 0.08; P = 0.004), as well as, in dependent regions, lower shunt fractions. Following 2 h of endotoxemia, PaO2/FiO2 ratios decreased in both groups, but more so with injurious ventilation, which also increased the shunt fraction in dependent lung. Protective ventilation resulted in less nonaerated lung (20-fold; P < 0.01) and more normally aerated lung (14-fold; P < 0.01). Ki was lower during protective (vs. injurious) ventilation, especially in dependent lung regions (0.0075 ± 0.0043/min vs. 0.0157 ± 0.0072/min; P < 0.01). 18F-FDG phosphorylation rate (k3) was twofold higher with injurious ventilation and accounted for most of the between-group difference in Ki. Dependent regions of the protective ventilation group exhibited lower k3 values per neutrophil than those in the injurious ventilation group (P = 0.01). In contrast, Fe was not affected by ventilation strategy (P = 0.52). Lung neutrophil counts were not different between groups, even when regional inflation was accounted for.

Conclusions

During systemic endotoxemia, protective ventilation may reduce the magnitude and heterogeneity of pulmonary inflammatory cell metabolic activity in early lung injury and may improve gas exchange through its effects predominantly in dependent lung regions. Such effects are likely related to a reduction in the metabolic activity, but not in the number, of lung-infiltrating neutrophils.

Introduction

There is little information on the effects of different mechanical ventilation strategies on in vivo regional lung inflammation. Nonetheless, reduction in regional inflammation is frequently proposed as the rationale for the benefit associated with protective ventilation in patients [13].

Pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation, a major process in the early stages of acute lung injury (ALI) [4, 5], is increasingly being assessed by measuring the net 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake rate (Ki) using positron emission tomography (PET) [611]. The current concept during ALI, derived from experimental studies, is that 18F-FDG uptake is determined predominantly by the combination of the absolute number of lung-infiltrating neutrophils and their metabolic activity [7, 10, 12]. In terms of kinetics modeling, Ki is the product of two parameters: the phosphorylation rate constant (k3, a surrogate of hexokinase activity) and the distribution volume of 18F-FDG as a fraction of lung volume (Fe) [13]. Accordingly, a similar net 18F-FDG uptake rate could result from a large number of inflammatory cells with low metabolic activity (low k3) as well as from a smaller number of cells with high metabolic activity (high k3). Such distinct conditions could represent different pathophysiological mechanisms through which mechanical ventilation strategies alter lung neutrophilic inflammation. Indeed, different biological features in the presence of distinct k3 have been observed in fields where 18F-FDG kinetics has previously been used, such as oncology. For instance, a high value of k3 was associated with poor prognosis in leukocyte malignancies [14, 15], and a low value of k3 was associated with effective anticancer therapy [16, 17].

Previous studies documenting leukocyte infiltration in ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) have focused on established injury [18]. However, the activity of leukocytes can be independent of the number of infiltrated cells, and the behavior of such leukocytes may depend on the stage of development of the injury and on the approach to ventilation. Although protective ventilation appears to affect the regional distribution of inflammation [19], it is not known whether ventilation strategy influences regional inflammatory cellular metabolic activity (for example, assessed by k3). PET-based methodology can be used to quantify regional lung 18F-FDG kinetics during ALI [20] and other pulmonary inflammatory conditions. We have previously shown in a model of two-hit ALI (VILI + endotoxemia) that both regional aeration and perfusion are associated with regional 18F-FDG uptake [8]. In the current study, we combined 18F-FDG-PET measurements of neutrophilic inflammation with PET assessments of perfusion and aeration in a sheep model to determine the impact of ventilation strategy on regional cellular metabolic activity during endotoxemia and to establish the association of this activity with regional changes in aeration and perfusion. We hypothesized that, during early endotoxemic lung injury, protective mechanical ventilation would reduce regional cellular metabolic activity (k3) and reduce the magnitude and heterogeneity of 18F-FDG uptake.

Materials and methods

Experimental preparation

The experimental protocols were approved by the Committee on Animal Care of the Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, USA). Twelve sheep (mean weight = 22.3 ± 5.9 kg) were fasted overnight and premedicated with intramuscular ketamine (4 mg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg/kg). After intravenous induction of anesthesia with ketamine (4 mg/kg), an endotracheal tube was inserted, in addition to a percutaneous femoral artery catheter (for arterial blood sampling and blood pressure monitoring) and a pulmonary artery catheter (right internal jugular vein) [10]. General anesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol and fentanyl [8], and muscle relaxation was maintained with pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg).

Mechanical ventilation

Baseline ventilation during experimental preparation (approximately 1.5 h) consisted of 8 ml/kg tidal volume (VT), 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and 20 breaths/min respiratory rate. Prior to endotoxin administration (see the "Experimental protocol" section below), animals were allocated sequentially to protective ventilation (low VT and high PEEP) or injurious ventilation (high VT and low PEEP), which was continued for 2 h. Protective ventilation comprised 8 ml/kg VT and titration of PEEP such that the plateau pressure (Pplat) was 30 cmH2O [3]. These settings were based on a clinically relevant strategy aimed at maximizing alveolar recruitment while limiting hyperinflation [3]. Injurious ventilation consisted of zero PEEP (0 cmH2O) and titrated VT, such that Pplat was 30 cmH2O. This strategy was aimed at producing both cyclic recruitment-derecruitment and volutrauma while limiting hyperinflation by applying the same Pplat levels used in the protective strategy. Volume-controlled ventilation was used in all cases.

A recruitment maneuver (continuous positive airway pressure of 40 cmH2O during 40 s [21]) was performed at the beginning of the experiment, before adjusting PEEP or VT. Inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) was titrated to a target arterial oxygen saturation greater than 88%, a 1:2 inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio and an 18 breaths/min respiratory rate and adjusted to maintain arterial carbon dioxide tension at 32 to 45 mmHg.

Positron emission tomography imaging protocol and processing

The imaging methods and analysis we used have been described in detail previously [10, 2224]. PET images consisted of 15 axial slices (slice thickness = 6.5 mm), corresponding to approximately 70% of the lung [24]. Three different modalities of PET scans were performed: (1) transmission scans to correct for attenuation in emission scans and to calculate fgas from regional tissue density, which was used to categorize the pulmonary parenchyma as nonaerated (fgas < 0.1), poorly aerated (0.1 ≤ fgas < 0.5), normally aerated (0.5 ≤ fgas < 0.85) and hyperinflated (fgas ≥ 0.85) [25]; (2) 13N[nitrogen] (13NN) emission scans using a bolus injection of 13NN-saline to measure regional pulmonary perfusion and shunt fraction [23, 26]; and (3) 18F-FDG emission scans to quantify regional metabolic activity using 18F-FDG kinetics. Doses of 5 to 10 mCi of 18F-FDG were infused for 60 s at a constant rate through the central venous catheter. Acquisition time of the dynamic PET scans was 75 min starting simultaneously with the beginning of 18F-FDG infusion.

The lung field was delineated using perfusion and gas fraction images [11, 27, 28]. The whole field was divided for analysis into three horizontal adjacent regions of interest (ROIs) of equal vertical height (nondependent, middle and dependent).

Modeling of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose kinetics

Inside cells, 18F-FDG is phosphorylated by hexokinase to 18F-FDG-6-phosphate, which accumulates in proportion to cellular metabolic rate. 18F-FDG net uptake rate was calculated by fitting the 18F-FDG kinetics with the Sokoloff three-compartment model for three isogravitational ROIs defined along the vertical axis: dependent, middle and nondependent [13]. This model is composed of one blood compartment and two tissue compartments, with the latter two representing a precursor and a metabolic compartment (Figure 1). The transfer rate constant k3 in this model characterizes 18F-FDG phosphorylation to 18F-FDG-6-phosphate (metabolic compartment), which is proportional to hexokinase activity and has been associated with cellular metabolic activity [16, 29]. The 18F-FDG net uptake rate is computed as Ki = Fe × k3, where Fe is the distribution volume of 18F-FDG as a fraction of lung volume [13, 20, 30].

Figure 1
figure1

Sokoloff model for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose tracer kinetics [13]. The three compartments of the model describe the activity concentration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in plasma (Cp(t)), the region of interest (ROI) concentration of extravascular 18F-FDG serving as a substrate pool for hexokinase (precursor compartment, Ce(t)) and the ROI concentration of phosphorylated 18F-FDG (Cm(t)). The arrows indicate the tracer exchanges in the dynamic model and the corresponding parameters. The rate constants k1 and k2 account for forward and backward transport of 18F-FDG between blood and tissue. k3 is the rate of 18F-FDG phosphorylation, reflecting hexokinase activity. The constant Fe represents the distribution volume of 18F-FDG (that is, the substrate pool for hexokinase) as a fraction of lung tissue volume.

To account for potential effects of lung inflation and blood volume on regional Ki, we also standardized Ki by lung tissue fraction, thus computing a specific Ki as follows: Kis = Ki/ftissue, where ftissue = (1 − fgasfblood) and fblood is the fractional volume of the blood compartment obtained from the Sokoloff model. Kis is proportional to 18F-FDG uptake per gram of lung tissue. The Patlak two-compartment model [31] was used to compute 18F-FDG net uptake rate at the voxel level (KiP) to calculate the spatial heterogeneity of 18F-FDG uptake using the standard deviation (SD(KiP)) and to construct parametric images [20].

Experimental protocol

Each sheep was placed supine in the PET scanner with the caudal end of the field of view just superior to the dome of the diaphragm. Physiological data and transmission and 13NN emission scans were acquired both at the start and after 2 h of mechanical ventilation, and the 18F-FDG scan was performed at the end of the study. After the initial set of scans, all sheep received a continuous infusion of endotoxin (Escherichia coli O55:B5, 10 ng/kg/min intravenously; List Biological Laboratories Inc, Campbell, CA, USA).

Histological analysis

Lungs were excised at the end of the experiment and fixed with Trump's fixative (BBC Biochemical, Mt Vernon, WA, USA) at a pressure of 25 cmH2O. Blocks of lung tissue were sampled from ventral and dorsal regions and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 5-μm thickness were cut, mounted and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for light microscopy. Lung neutrophil counts and semiquantitative ALI scores [32] were assessed in 40 randomly selected high-power (×400 magnification) fields per animal (10 per region, 2 regions per lung) by two investigators (NP and MT) who were blinded to the group assignment. This procedure included two steps. First, a JPEG picture was obtained for each field and analyzed using dedicated software (Image-Pro Plus version 6.0; MediaCybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). Each neutrophil was tallied and marked independently by investigators, and an overlay image was created. Second, for each single field, the values obtained were compared and, in cases of discrepancies in neutrophil counts between investigators, the histologic images were compared and discrepant neutrophil marks were discarded. This approach might have led to a slight underestimation of neutrophil counts but ensured better specificity. A final neutrophil count was obtained and expressed as neutrophils/field/unit of tissue, whereupon normalization for the tissue fraction of each field was performed to account for differences in regional lung inflation. Independent investigators had good agreement as to neutrophil counts in the injurious ventilation group (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient = 0.95) and the assessment of lung injury scores (κ = 0.65).

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SD if normally distributed or, if not, as median [25% to 75% interquartile range]. We compared physiological values (before and after mechanical ventilation and between ventilation groups) and PET-acquired data (between ventilation groups and isogravitational ROIs) using two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures when data or their log transformation displayed a normal distribution. Data that displayed a nonparametric distribution were compared using the Friedman rank-sum test.

Results

Baseline physiological variables

Protective ventilation yielded lower cardiac output (P < 0.05) and higher pulmonary vascular resistance (P < 0.001) after 2 h of mechanical ventilation and endotoxemia, despite similar baseline values (Table 1). Blood neutrophil counts decreased significantly in both groups following endotoxin administration (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Physiological variables and peripheral neutrophil counts at baseline and 2 hours after mechanical ventilation and endotoxemia.a

Oxygenation, regional aeration and perfusion before endotoxin administration

Before endotoxin administration, protective ventilation was associated with a higher overall lung gas fraction (fgas = 0.71 ± 0.12 vs. 0.48 ± 0.08; P = 0.004) and a better ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) to FiO2 (PaO2/FiO2 = 351 ± 117 mmHg vs. 255 ± 74 mmHg; P < 0.01) compared with injurious ventilation, despite no difference in venous admixture (0.15 [0.07 to 0.36] vs. 0.24 [0.03 to 0.49]; P = 0.89) (Table 1). Protective ventilation resulted in higher degrees of regional fgas in the middle and dependent lung regions (Figure 2A) compared with injurious ventilation. The amount of hyperinflated voxels was lower than 1% in both the protective and injurious ventilation groups.

Figure 2
figure2

Regional gas, perfusion and shunt fractions. Gas fraction (fgas) (A), perfusion fraction (B) and shunt fraction (C) for isogravitational (dependent, middle and nondependent) regions of interest of injurious (open symbols) and protective ventilation (filled symbols) groups at baseline (triangles) and after (circles) 2 h of mechanical ventilation and endotoxemia (ETX). fgas and perfusion fraction were stable over time in both groups. In contrast, shunt fraction dramatically increased over time in dependent regions of the injurious ventilation group, but not in those of the protective ventilation group. Horizontal lines represent median values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. P values are derived from two-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements and Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons.

Regional perfusion fraction with protective (vs. injurious) ventilation was lower in middle regions and higher in dependent regions (Figure 2B). There was a significant vertical dependence of perfusion in both groups at baseline (P < 0.01). Regional shunt also varied with isogravitational region (P < 0.001), but not with ventilation strategy, and was lower in dependent regions with protective vs. injurious ventilation (Figure 2C).

Oxygenation, regional aeration and perfusion after endotoxin administration

Following 2 h of endotoxin administration and mechanical ventilation, oxygenation decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.05). Global and regional (Figure 2A) lung aeration for both groups remained stable. Perfusion distribution to each isogravitational lung region was also maintained (Figure 2B). However, with injurious ventilation, there was a significant increase in shunt fraction in the dependent lung regions (P < 0.01), which did not occur with protective ventilation (Figure 2C).

Compared to injurious ventilation, protective ventilation after 2 h of endotoxemia was associated with better oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 = 261 ± 112 torr vs. 162 ± 47 torr; P = 0.05) and a trend toward lower venous admixture (0.37 [0.21 to 0.48] vs. 0.60 [0.37 to 0.75]; P = 0.06) (Table 1). Protective ventilation after endotoxin administration was associated with a lower perfusion fraction in middle regions (0.26 ± 0.08 vs. 0.37 ± 0.06; P < 0.05) but a higher perfusion fraction in dependent regions (0.66 ± 0.10 vs. 0.52 ± 0.08; P < 0.05) (Figure 2B). Regional shunt varied with isogravitational region (P < 0.001) and ventilation strategy (P < 0.01), with significant interaction (P < 0.001), and was reduced in dependent regions in the protective ventilation group (Figure 2C).

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake magnitude and topographical distribution

After endotoxin and 2 h of mechanical ventilation, global Ki, computed using the Sokoloff model, tended to be lower in the protective ventilation group (0.0056 ± 0.0029/min vs. 0.0102 ± 0.0053/min; P = 0.09) (Figure 3). At the regional level, there was a significant effect of isogravitational region (P < 0.001) and a trend toward a significant effect of ventilation strategy on Ki (P = 0.059) with significant interaction (isogravitational region × ventilation strategy; P = 0.005) (Figure 4A). In the dependent regions, Ki was lower with protective ventilation than with injurious ventilation (0.0075 ± 0.0043/min vs. 0.0157 ± 0.0072/min; P < 0.01) (Figure 4A). When differences in lung inflation and tissue volume were accounted for (KiS) (Figure 4B), the significant interaction between ventilation strategy and isogravitational region on KiS was maintained (P = 0.004), as was the independent effect of isogravitational region (P = 0.001).

Figure 3
figure3

Single-slice images of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake rate. Single-slice images of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake rate (KiP, computed voxel-by-voxel using the Patlak method [31]) in one sheep from the protective ventilation group (right panel) and in one from the injurious ventilation group (left panel). Left side in each image corresponds to the left side in the animal. 18F-FDG uptake was lower and more homogeneous in the protective ventilation experiment.

Figure 4
figure4

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose kinetics parameters. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) kinetics parameters for isogravitational (dependent, middle and nondependent) regions of interest of injurious (open circles) and protective (closed circles) ventilation groups. (A) 18F-FDG net uptake rate (Ki). (B) 18F-FDG net uptake rate normalized for tissue density and blood fraction (Kis = Ki/(1 − fgasfblood)); C) Transfer rate constant k3 (characterizes 18F-FDG phosphorylation to 18F-FDG-6-phosphate and reflects hexokinase activity); and D) Precursor compartment for 18F-FDG phosphorylation (Fe). Note the significant regional heterogeneity in the distribution of Kis and k3 in the injurious as compared to the protective ventilation group. Horizontal lines represent median values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001. P values are derived from two-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements, with Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons.

In order to understand the factors contributing to the changes in regional Ki, we studied its components: the cellular metabolic activity (k3) and the distribution volume of 18F-FDG as a fraction of lung volume (Fe, where Ki = k3 × Fe). k3 was significantly lower with protective ventilation than with injurious ventilation (P = 0.002) and was highest in dependent regions of injurious ventilation (Figure 4C). In contrast, Fe varied significantly by isogravitational region (P = 0.022) (Figure 4D).

Protective (vs. injurious) ventilation was associated with a threefold reduction in the spatial heterogeneity of pulmonary 18F-FDG uptake (indicated by SD(KiP); 0.0045 ± 0.0023/min vs. 0.0126 ± 0.0069/min; P < 0.01), reflecting a more homogeneous distribution of metabolic activation throughout the lung. The heterogeneity of 18F-FDG uptake distribution SD(KiP) correlated with KiP in both groups, with similar slopes (Figure 5); however, the protective ventilation group exhibited a lower y-intercept (0.0009 ± 0.0013/min vs. 0.0033 ± 0.0012/min; P < 0.01), such that for equivalent mean Ki values, the heterogeneity of Ki was lower with protective ventilation than with injurious ventilation.

Figure 5
figure5

Correlation between mean 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose net uptake rate at the voxel level and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake using the standard deviation. Linear regression between mean (KiP) and standard deviation (SD(KiP)) of voxel-level 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) net uptake rate computed using the Patlak method [31] for protective (filled circles) and injurious (open circles) ventilation groups. There was a significant correlation between mean KiP and SD(KiP) for both the protective ventilation group (continuous line; y = 0.48x + 0.001, r = 0.84, P = 0.034) and the injurious ventilation group (dashed line; y = 0.59x + 0.003, r = 0.98, P < 0.001). Note the offset between the two regression lines showing that, for equivalent KiP values, protective ventilation led to lower SD(KiP) than injurious ventilation.

Regional lung histology and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake values

Endotoxin infusion was associated with marked systemic neutropenia in both ventilation groups (Table 1). Median ALI scores were less than 2 on a scale of 12 in the dorsal and ventral regions of both groups, without a statistically significant difference (Table 2). No significant difference was observed in global lung neutrophil counts between the protective and injurious ventilation groups (53.2 ± 23.5/field/unit of tissue vs. 43.2 ± 11.6/field/unit of tissue; P = 0.24). At the regional level, there was no difference between groups (P = 0.33), but there was a significant effect of lung region on neutrophil count (P < 0.01) with no interaction (P = 0.87). In dependent regions, lung neutrophils of the injurious ventilation group exhibited higher k3 values than those of the protective ventilation group (Figure 6). There was a significant correlation between Fe and regional neutrophil counts found in histological analysis (r = 0.43; P = 0.046).

Table 2 Lung histological analysis.a
Figure 6
figure6

Metabolic activity per neutrophil in dependent lung regions. Neutrophils of the injurious ventilation group exhibited higher k3 values than those of the protective ventilation group (P = 0.012), reflecting higher hexokinase activity.

Discussion

Our main findings are that after only 2 h of the combined effects of endotoxemia and mechanical ventilation, a protective ventilation strategy that maximized alveolar recruitment and limited lung distension led to the following results: (1) decreased rate of phosphorylation of 18F-FDG (k3), which reflects metabolic cellular activity; (2) reduced heterogeneity of 18F-FDG uptake rate throughout the lung; (3) decreased magnitude of 18F-FDG uptake in the whole lung, predominantly by reducing 18F-FDG uptake in the poorly aerated, dependent lung regions, despite greater perfusion, and thus more endotoxin exposure in these areas in the protective than in the injurious ventilation strategy; and (4) no reduction in the number of lung-infiltrating neutrophils. These findings suggest an effect of the protective ventilation strategy with low VT in modulating the intensity and topographical distribution of regional pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation during mechanical ventilation following endotoxemia. The intensity of inflammation was best reflected in reduction of inflammatory cell metabolic activity (that is, k3), even when regional neutrophil numbers were similar.

Animal model

We used a well-established model of endotoxemia because of its reproducibility, its ability to induce pulmonary vascular neutrophil sequestration within the first hour [33] and thus its relevance to study neutrophil activation [34]. In previous studies, the current endotoxin dose allowed for survival of awake animals for 24 h [35, 36]. Thus, in terms of lung injury, the initial 2 h of endotoxin exposure represent early events, as attested by very low lung injury scores obtained by histological analysis. The scatter of PaO2/FiO2 ratio values obtained after 2 h of mechanical ventilation and endotoxin illustrates the intersubject variability of lung function impairment, even after standardized lung injury. Nevertheless, the protective ventilation strategy produced significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 levels than the injurious ventilation strategy. Our regional PET measurements confirmed that the model also yields a broad range of regional lung expansion with minimal hyperinflation (no regional fgas value above 0.9) and appropriately reflects the lung recruitment and reduction in shunting in dependent lung regions produced by protective ventilation. In addition, the approach to protective ventilation chosen in the current experiments closely reflects the management strategy used in one of the key randomized controlled clinical trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [3], in which VT was fixed and the level of PEEP adjusted to a predetermined Pplat, although important differences include the volume preset ventilation used in the current study as well as the normal initial lung compliance. In fact, we chose to set the VT at 8 ml/kg to limit alveolar hypoventilation related to the larger anatomic dead space in sheep than in humans (normal VT in spontaneously breathing sheep is approximately10 ml/kg) [37]. That VT setting provided a clear distinction from the injurious model, although it exceeded the current clinical recommendation for VT of 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight in ARDS patients [38, 39] and even lower settings (4.2 ml/kg) for ARDS patients with high Pplat [40]. Hemodynamics remained stable over time, which is consistent with the administration of mild doses of endotoxin. The lower cardiac output in the protective group was likely due to higher intrathoracic pressure associated with higher PEEP levels.

Early changes in regional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake during acute lung injury

In the acutely injured lung, PET imaging of the glucose analogue 18F-FDG functions as a noninvasive in vivo measure of neutrophilic inflammation [7, 10, 12, 41]. Recent human and animal studies of ALI and ARDS indicate that total 18F-FDG uptake may provide insight into disease mechanisms [8, 10, 11, 42, 43] and predict respiratory failure [44], as well as being useful in evaluation of therapy [45]; however, the impact of ventilation strategy (that is, protective vs. injurious) on intensity or topographic activity has not previously been reported. The current findings indicate, at least in the current model, that mechanical ventilation has an important effect in determining the regional distribution and degree of early neutrophilic inflammation. Protective ventilation resulted in more homogeneously distributed Ki and lower Ki values in dependent lung regions. Furthermore, we observed a trend toward reduction in pulmonary 18F-FDG uptake with protective ventilation, despite similar histological lung injury scores and equal end-inspiratory pressures. These results are compatible with the concept that ventilation strategy plays an early pathogenic role in determining the profile of inflammatory cell distribution before lung injury is established [46] and emphasize that the prevention of VILI should be a key aspect of patient management, even when mechanical ventilation period and the underlying level of injury are limited [47].

Our in vivo measurements substantiate prior speculation that heterogeneous inflammation may be an important element of the pathogenesis of ALI and ARDS [19, 48]. However, there are conflicting data on the topography of early lung inflammation during ALI and ARDS. A previous study in a surfactant-depleted small animal model (saline lavage rat model) indicated that aerated, nondependent regions were those predominantly affected by mechanical ventilation without limitation of end-inspiratory pressure [49]. In that study, surfactant depletion promoted the derecruitment of dependent regions and thus likely led to overexpansion of nondependent regions substantially more than in the injurious ventilation group in the current study. This phenomenon was amplified by the application of larger VT in the rat model (25 ml/kg), resulting in a much larger nondependent strain [49]. Recently, researchers in a study in which a sheep model of endotoxemic ARDS and mechanical ventilation was used reported that inflammatory changes occurred predominantly in apical lung regions, but not in basal regions [50]. Such topographic differences with our injurious ventilation group might be related to the application of PEEP, which prevented the development of inflammation in dorsal regions, likely through the reduction of low lung volume mechanisms. Our results in an animal model of size comparable to the human and using clinically relevant Pplat limits indicate that, in early endotoxemia during mechanical ventilation without PEEP, inflammation occurs in the dependent regions. This suggests that those regions may be targeted as key foci indicating inflammatory activity with the potential for PET imaging to quantify treatment response.

There is controversy regarding the relationship between regional 18F-FDG uptake and regional aeration and perfusion in heterogeneous lungs [51]. In a model of endotoxemic ALI and mechanical ventilation [8], we previously suggested that higher regional 18F-FDG uptake was associated with regional extremes in aeration (low and high) and high perfusion. This suggested an effect of both low-volume lung injury and hyperinflation on 18F-FDG uptake and presumably indicated a link between regional neutrophilic inflammation and regional exposure to endotoxins, inflammatory mediators and cells. In this context, the reduced 18F-FDG uptake in dependent regions of the protective ventilation group, despite an increase in perfusion of these regions, suggests that the effect of the protective ventilation strategy on reducing 18F-FDG uptake was predominantly related to increased regional aeration. This effect could have been partially due to the reduction in the shunt fraction of dependent regions, as hypoxemia promotes neutrophil influx into shunting regions through increased neutrophil-endothelium interaction [52].

Cellular factors contributing to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake

Pulmonary 18F-FDG uptake is determined by both cell numbers and cellular metabolic activity [20, 30, 41]. Individual cell activation is associated with increased energy requirements, and enhanced glucose uptake (that is, cellular metabolic activity) reflects the energy involved in key functions (for example, migration, phagocytosis, degranulation, generation of toxic reactive oxygen intermediates and cytokine production) [53, 54]. Quantification of cell activation independent of the inflammatory cell number may be particularly relevant during ALI, given the major role of neutrophil activation in the early stages of ALI [55]. Indeed, previous studies have suggested that lung injury is affected mainly by neutrophil activation rather than by their number [41, 55, 56] that the transfer rate (k3 in this analysis) obtained from the analysis of 18F-FDG kinetics associated with hexokinase activity [13, 20] allows for such assessment [16].

Our results suggest that the effect of ventilation strategy in reducing 18F-FDG uptake during early endotoxemia was predominantly through its effect on cellular metabolic activity (k3), not on cell number (Fe). Metabolic activity, k3, was the predominant contributing factor to the reduction in 18F-FDG uptake by protective (vs. injurious) ventilation and was significantly reduced in dependent lung regions in the protective ventilation group. Given that the cells taking up 18F-FDG are predominantly neutrophils in this model [7, 8, 12, 30, 41], the lower k3 value mainly reflects lower metabolic activity of lung-infiltrating neutrophils during protective ventilation with higher PEEP and lower VT.

This predominant role of k3 was confirmed by the finding of lower Ki with protective vs. injurious ventilation for a similar range of regional neutrophil quantities in both groups, measured independently and using direct histological methods. Moreover, we found lower k3 values per neutrophil in dependent regions of the protective (vs. injurious) ventilation group (Figure 6). This novel finding leads us to speculate that a reduction in lung neutrophil activity could be a mechanism by which protective ventilation improves outcomes of ALI and ARDS patients [3, 38]. This result also suggests that quantification of cell activation (k3) allows for characterization of differences in the type and severity of ALI, even when inflammatory cell numbers are similar. This observation is compatible with the reported relationship between k3 and severity of disease in cancer research, where cell activity was indicated as a marker of severity [14, 16, 17], and suggests that k3 could be a sensitive tool with which to monitor noninvasively early changes in lung inflammation in ALI and ARDS. The observed dissociation between cell numbers and metabolic activity suggested by the current study in an experimental model of ALI paves the way for the development of new methods for quantifying the effects of mechanical or pharmacological interventions in ALI and ARDS.

Factors associated with modulation of lung inflammation by a protective ventilation strategy

Different factors could explain the reduction in neutrophil activation associated with protective ventilation. First, there are those related to regional lung mechanics. Given that the same Pplat was used in all animals, group differences in 18F-FDG uptake should be due to different PEEP volume and VT. Because significant differences in 18F-FDG uptake were evident in the dependent poorly aerated lung regions, low-volume lung injury is a likely factor. Such injury is related to processes such as repetitive opening and closing of distal airways and alveoli [57, 58], concentration of regional mechanical forces [59] and propagation of air in fluid-filled airways [60]. In fact, this low-volume effect associated with smaller PEEP levels would be magnified by the concomitant increase in VT [61]. Because dependent lung units with mechanical instability express higher cytokine levels than nondependent units [19], reduction in the number of those units by protective ventilation could decrease the activation of inflammatory cells and result in lower Ki independently of the number of neutrophils.

The linear relationship between SD(Kip) and Kip for both groups is suggestive of a positive feedback mechanism in the generation of the spatial distribution of Kip. Points were tightly distributed around the regression line and showed an increase in Kip heterogeneity as the average inflammation level increased, with an approximately constant coefficient of variation. The coefficient of variation is related by a monotonic, increasing transformation to the standard deviation of a log-normal distribution [62]. This distribution describes multiplicative phenomena and is frequently encountered in lung physiology [63, 64]. We speculate that a multiplicative factor in our study could have been produced by triggering of regional lung inflammation with parenchymal cell activation and release of inflammatory mediators. This would result in chemotaxis and additional regional cellular activation, which would amplify the inflammatory process [5, 64]. In contrast, less inflamed lung regions would not demonstrate such amplification. These changes would result in an increase in the mean and SD Kip values. Our results suggest that such an increase occurs according to a well-defined quantitative relationship.

Methodological considerations and limitations

First, we used two strategies of ventilation (low VT/high PEEP vs. high VT/low PEEP) designed to produce clearly different degrees of lung inflation magnitude and heterogeneity in order to test the effect of mechanical ventilation on regional cellular metabolic activity. Thus, our results cannot be directly extrapolated to the clinical context. In fact, whereas the maximal recruitment strategy produced a trend towards lower mortality in patients with severe ARDS, it led to the opposite trend in patients with predominantly mild ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 >181 mmHg) [3]. Accordingly, further studies will be needed to exactly determine settings consistent with "protective ventilation" for the individual patient. Second, the observed relation between histological neutrophil counts and the distribution volume of 18F-FDG (Fe) was weak, suggesting that other cell types contributed to 18F-FDG uptake, as previously shown [65]. The cellular mechanisms associated with increased 18F-FDG uptake, specifically changes in k3, were not investigated in this study and could involve metabolic changes associated with the polarization and migrational status of lung neutrophils [54], Toll-like receptor 4-dependent mechanisms [66, 67] and the regional production of neutrophil chemoattractant cytokines [68].

Conclusion

Our present study shows that, at early stages of endotoxemic ALI, mechanical ventilation strategy strongly influences the intensity and distribution of neutrophil inflammation in the lungs. Protective ventilation (increased alveolar recruitment, low VT) improved gas exchange and reduced inflammatory cell activity, especially in dependent lung regions. The main cause of reduced inflammatory cell activity was lowered neutrophilic metabolic activity (phosphorylation rate), not changes in regional cell counts. This suggests that mechanical ventilation may modulate regional neutrophilic inflammation in early stages of endotoxemic ALI.

Key messages

  • At early stages of endotoxemic ALI, mechanical ventilation strategy influences the intensity and distribution of neutrophil inflammation in the lungs.

  • Protective ventilation improved gas exchange and reduced inflammatory cell activity in dependent lung regions.

  • The main cause of reduced inflammatory cell activity was lowered neutrophilic metabolic activity.

Abbreviations

ALI:

Acute lung injury

18F-FDG:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

f gas :

Gas fraction

PET:

Positron emission tomography

ROI:

Region of interest

VILI:

Ventilator-induced lung injury.

References

  1. 1.

    Gattinoni L, Caironi P: Refining ventilatory treatment for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2008, 299: 691-693. 10.1001/jama.299.6.691

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tremblay L, Valenza F, Ribeiro SP, Li J, Slutsky AS: Injurious ventilatory strategies increase cytokines and c-fos m-RNA expression in an isolated rat lung model. J Clin Invest 1997, 99: 944-952. 10.1172/JCI119259

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mercat A, Richard JC, Vielle B, Jaber S, Osman D, Diehl JL, Lefrant JY, Prat G, Richecoeur J, Nieszkowska A, Gervais C, Baudot J, Bouadma L, Brochard L, Expiratory Pressure (Express) Study Group: Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008, 299: 646-655. 10.1001/jama.299.6.646

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Azoulay E, Attalah H, Yang K, Herigault S, Jouault H, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L, Harf A, Schlemmer B, Delclaux C: Exacerbation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of prior acute lung injury during neutropenia recovery in rats. Crit Care Med 2003, 31: 157-165. 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00025

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hogg JC: Neutrophil kinetics and lung injury. Physiol Rev 1987, 67: 1249-1295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen DL, Rosenbluth DB, Mintun MA, Schuster DP: FDG-PET imaging of pulmonary inflammation in healthy volunteers after airway instillation of endotoxin. J Appl Physiol 2006, 100: 1602-1609. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01429.2005

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chen DL, Schuster DP: Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose to evaluate neutrophil kinetics during acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004, 286: L834-L840.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Costa EL, Musch G, Winkler T, Schroeder T, Harris RS, Jones HA, Venegas JG, Vidal Melo MF: Mild endotoxemia during mechanical ventilation produces spatially heterogeneous pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation in sheep. Anesthesiology 2010, 112: 658-669. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cbd1d4

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jones HA, Marino PS, Shakur BH, Morrell NW: In vivo assessment of lung inflammatory cell activity in patients with COPD and asthma. Eur Respir J 2003, 21: 567-573. 10.1183/09031936.03.00048502

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Musch G, Venegas JG, Bellani G, Winkler T, Schroeder T, Petersen B, Harris RS, Melo MF: Regional gas exchange and cellular metabolic activity in ventilator-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology 2007, 106: 723-735. 10.1097/01.anes.0000264748.86145.ac

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    de Prost N, Costa EL, Wellman T, Musch G, Winkler T, Tucci MR, Harris RS, Venegas JG, Vidal Melo MF: Effects of surfactant depletion on regional pulmonary metabolic activity during mechanical ventilation. J Appl Physiol 2011, 111: 1249-1258. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00311.2011

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jones HA, Clark RJ, Rhodes CG, Schofield JB, Krausz T, Haslett C: In vivo measurement of neutrophil activity in experimental lung inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149: 1635-1639. 10.1164/ajrccm.149.6.7516252

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sokoloff L, Reivich M, Kennedy C, Des Rosiers MH, Patlak CS, Pettigrew KD, Sakurada O, Shinohara M: The [14C]deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization: theory, procedure, and normal values in the conscious and anesthetized albino rat. J Neurochem 1977, 28: 897-916. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10649.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hoffmann M, Bergner R, Uppenkamp M, Haberkorn U, Strauss LG: Prediction of progression-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma following anthracycline-based chemotherapy based on dynamic FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med 2009, 34: 576-584. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181b06bc5

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kimura N, Yamamoto Y, Kameyama R, Hatakeyama T, Kawai N, Nishiyama Y: Diagnostic value of kinetic analysis using dynamic 18F-FDG-PET in patients with malignant primary brain tumor. Nucl Med Commun 2009, 30: 602-609. 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32832e1c7d

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Okazumi S, Isono K, Enomoto K, Kikuchi T, Ozaki M, Yamamoto H, Hayashi H, Asano T, Ryu M: Evaluation of liver tumors using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: characterization of tumor and assessment of effect of treatment. J Nucl Med 1992, 33: 333-339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Burger C, Rühl A, Irngartinger G, Stremmel W, Rudi J: Prognostic aspects of 18F-FDG PET kinetics in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy. J Nucl Med 2004, 45: 1480-1487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kawano T, Mori S, Cybulsky M, Burger R, Ballin A, Cutz E, Bryan AC: Effect of granulocyte depletion in a ventilated surfactant-depleted lung. J Appl Physiol 1987, 62: 27-33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Otto CM, Markstaller K, Kajikawa O, Karmrodt J, Syring RS, Pfeiffer B, Good VP, Frevert CW, Baumgardner JE: Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of ventilator-associated lung injury after surfactant depletion. J Appl Physiol 2008, 104: 1485-1494. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01089.2007

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schroeder T, Vidal Melo MF, Musch G, Harris RS, Venegas JG, Winkler T: Modeling pulmonary kinetics of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose during acute lung injury. Acad Radiol 2008, 15: 763-775. 10.1016/j.acra.2007.12.016

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Barbas V, Sílvia C: Lung recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome and facilitating resolution. Crit Care Med 2003,31(4 Suppl):S265-S271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Musch G, Bellani G, Vidal Melo MF, Harris RS, Winkler T, Schroeder T, Venegas JG: Relation between shunt, aeration, and perfusion in experimental acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008, 177: 292-300. 10.1164/rccm.200703-484OC

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    O'Neill K, Venegas JG, Richter T, Harris RS, Layfield JDH, Musch G, Winkler T, Melo MF: Modeling kinetics of infused 13NN-saline in acute lung injury. J Appl Physiol 2003, 95: 2471-2484.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vidal Melo MF, Layfield D, Harris RS, O'Neill K, Musch G, Richter T, Winkler T, Fischman AJ, Venegas JG: Quantification of regional ventilation-perfusion ratios with PET. J Nucl Med 2003, 44: 1982-1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Caramez MP, Arantes PR, Barros F, Souza CE, Victorino JA, Kacmarek RM, Barbas CS, Carvalho CR, Amato MB: Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006, 174: 268-278. 10.1164/rccm.200506-976OC

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Galletti GG, Venegas JG: Tracer kinetic model of regional pulmonary function using positron emission tomography. J Appl Physiol 2002, 93: 1104-1114.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vidal Melo MF, Harris RS, Layfield D, Musch G, Venegas JG: Changes in regional ventilation after autologous blood clot pulmonary embolism. Anesthesiology 2002, 97: 671-681. 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00022

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Richard JC, Bregeon F, Costes N, Bars DL, Tourvieille C, Lavenne F, Janier M, Bourdin G, Gimenez G, Guerin C: Effects of prone position and positive end-expiratory pressure on lung perfusion and ventilation. Crit Care Med 2008, 36: 2373-2380. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818094a9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wiebe LI: FDG metabolism Quaecumque sunt vera . J Nucl Med 2001, 42: 1679-1681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    de Prost N, Tucci MR, Melo MF: Assessment of lung inflammation with 18F-FDG PET during acute lung injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195: 292-300. 10.2214/AJR.10.4499

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD: Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Me

  32. 32.

    Mikawa K, Maekawa N, Nishina K, Takao Y, Yaku H, Obara H: Effect of lidocaine pretreatment on endotoxin-induced lung injury in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1994, 81: 689-699. 10.1097/00000542-199409000-00023

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Warner AE, DeCamp MM Jr, Molina RM, Brain JD: Pulmonary removal of circulating endotoxin results in acute lung injury in sheep. Lab Invest 1988, 59: 219-230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Markovic N, McCaig LA, Stephen J, Mizuguchi S, Veldhuizen RA, Lewis JF, Cepinskas G: Mediators released from LPS-challenged lungs induce inflammatory responses in liver vascular endothelial cells and neutrophilic leukocytes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2009, 297: G1066-G1076. 10.1152/ajpgi.00278.2009

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Traber DL, Schlag G, Redl H, Strohmair W, Traber LD: Pulmonary microvascular changes during hyperdynamic sepsis in an ovine model. Circ Shock 1987, 22: 185-193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wang CZ, Herndon DN, Traber LD, Yang SF, Cox RA, Nakazawa H, Barrow RE, Traber DL: Pulmonary inflammatory cell response to sustained endotoxin administration. J Appl Physiol 1994, 76: 516-522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Polaner DM, Kimball WR, Fratacci MD, Wain JC, Torres A, Kacmarek RM, Zapol WM: Effects of aminophylline on regional diaphragmatic shortening after thoracotomy in the awake lamb. Anesthesiology 1992, 77: 93-100. 10.1097/00000542-199207000-00014

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000, 342: 1301-1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L, Antonelli M, Anzueto A, Beale R, Brochard L, Brower R, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, Rhodes A, Slutsky AS, Vincent JL, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ranieri VM: The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med 2012, 38: 1573-1582. 10.1007/s00134-012-2682-1

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L, Urbino R, Martin EL, Birocco A, Faggiano C, Quintel M, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM: Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology 2009, 111: 826-835. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jones HA, Sriskandan S, Peters AM, Pride NB, Krausz T, Boobis AR, Haslett C: Dissociation of neutrophil emigration and metabolic activity in lobar pneumonia and bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 1997, 10: 795-803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bellani G, Messa C, Guerra L, Spagnolli E, Foti G, Patroniti N, Fumagalli R, Musch G, Fazio F, Pesenti A: Lungs with acute respiratory distress syndrome show diffuse inflammation in normally aerated regions: a [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography study. Crit Care Med 2009, 37: 2216-2222. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181aab31f

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bellani G, Guerra L, Musch G, Zanella A, Patroniti N, Mauri T, Messa C, Pesenti A: Lung regional metabolic activity and gas volume changes induced by tidal ventilation in patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011, 183: 1193-1199. 10.1164/rccm.201008-1318OC

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rodrigues RS, Miller PR, Bozza FA, Marchiori E, Zimmerman GA, Hoffman JM, Morton KA: FDG-PET in patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a preliminary report. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34: 2273-2278. 10.1007/s00134-008-1220-7

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chen DL, Bedient TJ, Kozlowski J, Rosenbluth DB, Isakow W, Ferkol TW, Thomas B, Mintun MA, Schuster DP, Walter MJ: [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for lung antiinflammatory response evaluation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009, 180: 533-539. 10.1164/rccm.200904-0501OC

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Moriyama K, Ishizaka A, Nakamura M, Kubo H, Kotani T, Yamamoto S, Ogawa EN, Kajikawa O, Frevert CW, Kotake Y, Morisaki H, Koh H, Tasaka S, Martin TR, Takeda J: Enhancement of the endotoxin recognition pathway by ventilation with a large tidal volume in rabbits. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004, 286: L1114-L1121. 10.1152/ajplung.00296.2003

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fernández-Pérez ER, Keegan MT, Brown DR, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O: Intraoperative tidal volume as a risk factor for respiratory failure after pneumonectomy. Anesthesiology 2006, 105: 14-18. 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00007

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sinclair SE, Chi E, Lin HI, Altemeier WA: Positive end-expiratory pressure alters the severity and spatial heterogeneity of ventilator-induced lung injury: an argument for cyclical airway collapse. J Crit Care 2009, 24: 206-211. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.04.005

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tsuchida S, Engelberts D, Peltekova V, Hopkins N, Frndova H, Babyn P, McKerlie C, Post M, McLoughlin P, Kavanagh BP: Atelectasis causes alveolar injury in nonatelectatic lung regions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006, 174: 279-289. 10.1164/rccm.200506-1006OC

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Fernandez-Bustamante A, Easley RB, Fuld M, Mulreany D, Chon D, Lewis JF, Simon BA: Regional pulmonary inflammation in an endotoxemic ovine acute lung injury model. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2012, 183: 149-158. 10.1016/j.resp.2012.06.015

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rodrigues RS, Carvalho AR, Morton KA, Bozza FA: (18)-F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography study in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2010, 38: 347-348. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181bfe7de

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Arnould T, Michiels C, Remacle J: Increased PMN adherence on endothelial cells after hypoxia: involvement of PAF, CD18/CD11b, and ICAM-1. Am J Physiol 1993, 264: C1102-C1110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Amrein PC, Larson SM, Wagner HN Jr: An automated system for measurement of leukocyte metabolism. J Nucl Med 1974, 15: 352-355.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jones HA, Cadwallader KA, White JF, Uddin M, Peters AM, Chilvers ER: Dissociation between respiratory burst activity and deoxyglucose uptake in human neutrophil granulocytes: implications for interpretation of 18F-FDG PET images. J Nucl Med 2002, 43: 652-657.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Abraham E: Neutrophils and acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2003,31(4 Suppl):S195-S199.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lee WL, Downey GP: Neutrophil activation and acute lung injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001, 7: 1-7. 10.1097/00075198-200102000-00001

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Muscedere JG, Mullen JB, Gan K, Slutsky AS: Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149: 1327-1334. 10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173774

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    D'Angelo E, Pecchiari M, Baraggia P, Saetta M, Balestro E, Milic-Emili J: Low-volume ventilation causes peripheral airway injury and increased airway resistance in normal rabbits. J Appl Physiol 2002, 92: 949-956.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Mead J, Takishima T, Leith D: Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. J Appl Physiol 1970, 28: 596-608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bilek AM, Dee KC, Gaver DP 3rd: Mechanisms of surface-tension-induced epithelial cell damage in a model of pulmonary airway reopening. J Appl Physiol 2003, 94: 770-783. 10.1063/1.1582234

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Baumgardner JE, Markstaller K, Pfeiffer B, Doebrich M, Otto CM: Effects of respiratory rate, plateau pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure on PaO 2 oscillations after saline lavage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 166: 1556-1562. 10.1164/rccm.200207-717OC

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M: Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 2001, 51: 341-352. 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:LNDATS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wagner PD, Laravuso RB, Uhi RR, West JB: Continuous distributions of ventilation-perfusion ratios in normal subjects breathing air and 100% O 2 . J Clin Invest 1974, 54: 54-68. 10.1172/JCI107750

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Schroeder T, Vidal Melo MF, Musch G, Harris RS, Winkler T, Venegas JG: PET imaging of regional 18F-FDG uptake and lung function after cigarette smoke inhalation. J Nucl Med 2007, 48: 413-419.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Saha D, Takahashi K, de Prost N, Winkler T, Pinilla-Vera M, Baron RM, Vidal Melo MF: Micro-autoradiographic assessment of cell types contributing to 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose uptake during ventilator-induced and endotoxemic lung injury. Mol Imaging Biol 2013, 15: 19-27. 10.1007/s11307-012-0575-x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Andonegui G, Bonder CS, Green F, Mullaly SC, Zbytnuik L, Raharjo E, Kubes P: Endothelium-derived Toll-like receptor-4 is the key molecule in LPS-induced neutrophil sequestration into lungs. J Clin Invest 2003, 111: 1011-1020.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhou Z, Kozlowski J, Goodrich AL, Markman N, Chen DL, Schuster DP: Molecular imaging of lung glucose uptake after endotoxin in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2005, 289: L760-L768. 10.1152/ajplung.00146.2005

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    de Prost N, Feng Y, Wellman T, Winkler T, Musch G, Tucci MR, Costa EL, Harris RS, Venegas JG, Chao W, Vidal Melo MF: 18F-FDG kinetics parameters correlate with regional lung neutrophil counts and chemokines during early endotoxemia [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011, 183: A2556.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Sandrine Katsahian for statistical assistance. This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grant 5R01-HL086827. GM received salary support from NHLBI grant 5K08HL076464. NP received a scholarship from the Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française (SPLF).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos F Vidal Melo.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

NP, EC, TWe, TWi, BK and MVM designed the study. NP, EC, TWe, MT, TWi, GM, RH, JV and MVM performed the experiments and analyzed the results. NP, EC, TWe, GM, MT, TWi, RH, JV, BK and MVM wrote and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Prost, N., Costa, E.L., Wellman, T. et al. Effects of ventilation strategy on distribution of lung inflammatory cell activity. Crit Care 17, R175 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12854

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acute Lung Injury
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patient
  • Ventilation Strategy
  • Protective Ventilation
  • Endotoxin Administration