Skip to main content

Response to: norepinephrine formulation for equivalent vasopressive score

The Original Article was published on 16 February 2023

The Original Article was published on 20 January 2023

Dear Editor,


We thank Mongardon et al. for their interest in our manuscript on an updated norepinephrine equivalent score in intensive care [1]. They correctly pointed out that two formulations of norepinephrine (2 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL) are available in different countries and hospitals [2].

Extensive research in drug agency databases and contacts with colleagues in five continents surprisingly showed that norepinephrine (better defined as norepinephrine base) is unavailable in the market. Each country has one or more commercially available products, which are different salt formulations, named tartrate, bitartrate, hemitartrate, hydrochloride, or maleate. On average, norepinephrine salts seem to be half potent as norepinephrine base (although pharmacists would consider it as a matter of dilution, not potency). Even if these issues have existed in the last decades, they have not been addressed properly.

Since expert physicians carefully and judiciously titrate norepinephrine with a blood pressure target, the dose is patient-tailored in most situations. It is also true that initiation of a second- and third-line vasoconstrictor, use of off-label vasoconstrictors, and administration of mechanical circulatory support might be triggered by the administered dose as expressed by µg/kg/min. It is unknown whether the experts writing the guidelines, commentaries, and existing vasoactive equivalent scores were referring to norepinephrine base, which does not exist and has never existed, or norepinephrine salts. From the pharmacological point of view, it would be correct to expect that the drug is prepared by pharmacists and nurses worldwide according to norepinephrine base dose equivalence, and therefore, this is what guidelines and existing vasoactive scores are likely referring to. At the same time, situations are likely very jeopardized globally between different intensive care units and hospitals in the same country using different doses, either norepinephrine base or less potent (more diluted) norepinephrine salts.

Multidisciplinary and international consensus concerning the formulation used to describe norepinephrine dose would help prevent dosing confusion in daily practice and facilitate interpreting clinical trial findings in different settings.

Availability of data and materials

Further information is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Kotani Y, Di Gioia A, Landoni G, Belletti A, Khanna AK. An updated “norepinephrine equivalent” score in intensive care as a marker of shock severity. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mongardon N, de Roux Q, Leone M, Guerci P. Norepinephrine formulation for equivalent vasopressive score. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Dr. Yuki Kotani receives support from the Uehara Memorial Foundation. The funding agency had no role in the study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report, or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YK, GL, AB, and AKK wrote and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Landoni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotani, Y., Landoni, G., Belletti, A. et al. Response to: norepinephrine formulation for equivalent vasopressive score. Crit Care 27, 125 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04404-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04404-x