Skip to main content
Download PDF

The central role of the gut in intensive care

Critical Care volume 26, Article number: 379 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Critically ill patients undergo early impairment of their gut microbiota (GM) due to routine antibiotic therapies and other environmental factors leading to intestinal dysbiosis. The GM establishes connections with the rest of the human body along several axes representing critical inter-organ crosstalks that, once disrupted, play a major role in the pathophysiology of numerous diseases and their complications. Key players in this communication are GM metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids and bile acids, neurotransmitters, hormones, interleukins, and toxins. Intensivists juggle at the crossroad of multiple connections between the intestine and the rest of the body. Harnessing the GM in ICU could improve the management of several challenges, such as infections, traumatic brain injury, heart failure, kidney injury, and liver dysfunction. The study of molecular pathways affected by the GM in different clinical conditions is still at an early stage, and evidence in critically ill patients is lacking. This review aims to describe dysbiosis in critical illness and provide intensivists with a perspective on the potential as adjuvant strategies (e.g., nutrition, probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics supplementation, adsorbent charcoal, beta-lactamase, and fecal microbiota transplantation) to modulate the GM in ICU patients and attempt to restore eubiosis.

Introduction

The total number of human cells is approximately 3.0·1013while the number of microorganisms inhabiting humans is approximately 3.8·1013 [1]. Collectively, they constitute the human microbiota, representing an organ itself [2].

Most of the microbiota colonizes the gut establishing a symbiosis with their host [3]. The gut microbiota (GM) of a healthy subject harbors all three main life domains: bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. The bacterial domain is the most represented [4]. There are six known bacterial phyla [5]. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the most abundant, followed by Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria [6, 7]. The GM composition varies among individuals, changing throughout life due to intrinsic factors like age and genetics and extrinsic modifiable factors like diet [8], environment, and drug use [9]. In healthy individuals, the GM has prerogative functions, including enterocyte renewal modulation, metabolic and antimicrobic actions, and systemic activities such as improvement of glucose sensitivity [10], reduction of systemic inflammation, and even longevity [11]. Illness and drugs can disrupt the GM balance. In the intensive care unit (ICU), patients are subjected to antibiotics, gastrointestinal transit changes, nutritional changes, and sepsis [4], collectively leading to a GM imbalance, namely dysbiosis, whose most common symptom is diarrhea [12]. Ninety percent of the intestinal microflora is lost within 6 h of ICU admission [13]. ICU patients have lower bacterial diversity and variability, and opportunistic pathogens are enriched over symbiotics [14,15,16]. Most opportunistic pathogens are Gram-negative aerobic proteobacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. [14]. This imbalance can lead to Candida albicans overgrowth in critically ill patients [2, 14, 15] while beneficial species such as Ruminococcus spp., Pseudobutyrivibrio spp., and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii become less represented [17, 18]. For these reasons, the GM in critically ill patients is defined as "pathobiota" (Fig. 1) [19]. The GM is also the main reservoir for "multidrug-resistant" bacteria (MDROs): Initially, these bacteria are counteracted by the resident beneficial bacteria, but then, as antibiotics eradicate them, MDROs take over and may promote infections during hospitalization [reviewed in [20]].

Fig. 1
figure 1

P1:The shift from microbiota to pathobiota in the ICU is driven by antibiotics and ICU-specific treatments like artificial feeding, mechanical ventilation, proton pump inhibitors, vasopressors, and opioids

Full size image

In critically ill patients, dysbiosis could be considered an organ dysfunction [21]. This review aims to describe this impairment and provide intensivists with a perspective on the currently available strategies to modulate the GM in ICU patients.

The gut microbiota and the host

The GM interacts with its host (Fig. 2), and scientists are just beginning to characterize GM composition and function in health and disease. This paragraph describes the GM functions and how it interacts with the body, focusing on critically ill patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The GM interacts with its host along several axes. The GM is at the crossroad of multiple arrows representing molecular pathways involved in axes’communication. Further details in the main text. SCFAs: Short-Chain Fatty Acids. LCFAs: long chain fatty acids. FGF-19: Fibroblast growth factor 19

Full size image

The gut–brain axis

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) has always been considered molecule impermeable. However, immune cells, neurotransmitters, and some gut bacterial metabolites (SCFAs, vitamins, bile acids) can pass through it [reviewed in [22]]. These molecules affect memory, learning, behavior, and locomotion. Unbalanced molecular communication contributes to neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases [23], traumatic brain injury (TBI) [24], and sepsis-correlated brain impairment [25, 26]. The gut–brain axis (GBA) bidirectionally connects the central nervous system with the enteric one. It goes beyond a mere anatomical network and includes immune, endocrine, metabolic, and humoral communication routes. The GBA was first described in the early 2000s when antibiotic-treated germ-free (GF) or specific pathogen-free mice developed neurological problems [27]. The GBA links brain’s emotional and cognitive centers with the gut [28]. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacteria, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus produce acetylcholine,γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and serotonin [29]. Serotonin impacts brain functions, heart, bowel motility, bladder control, and platelet aggregation. Serotonin-based treatments in psychiatry and neurology regulate sleep, mood, and behavior [30]. Ninety-five percent of serotonin is produced from tryptophan in the gut by microbes [31, 32]. The GM also produces SCFAs butyrate, acetate, and propionate by fiber fermentation [22]. SCFAs contribute to maintaining the gut and BBB physiology. GF mice have increased gut and BBB permeability, and supplementation with the SCFAs-producing Clostridium tyrobutyricum restores both gut and brain homeostasis [33]. SCFAs influence the production of glutamate, glutamine, GABA, and neurotrophic factors. Propionate and butyrate modulate the expression of serotonin- and catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes and regulate intracellular potassium levels [reviewed in [34]].

Dysbiosis in the GBA is linked to neuroinflammation through the creation of the inflammasome, a biological complex of innate immune system multiprotein oligomers that activates inflammatory responses. Activated by pathogens or stress signals, the inflammasome assembles, producing pro-inflammatory cytokines [e.g.,interleukins (IL)-1 and IL-18] implicated in neuroimmunomodulation, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and pyroptosis [35]. GM and inflammasome are strongly connected. Indeed, the inflammasome binds pathogen-associated and/or danger-associated molecular patterns, specific molecular motifs carried by gut microorganisms. Thus, a perturbation of the GM composition could overstimulate the inflammasome and compromise the GBA homeostasis, promoting neuroinflammation as seen in multiple sclerosis [36], Alzheimer's disease [37], Parkinson's disease [38], neuropsychiatric disorders [39], and sepsis [25, 26]. While no human studies are available, a recent preclinical study has shown how the GM plays a part in sepsis-associated encephalopathy by improving neurological outcomes when indole-3-propionic acid, a microbial neuroprotective metabolite, is produced, leading to the inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion in the microglia [26]. Similar preclinical results have been found in model of sepsis-induced cognitive decline [25], emphasizing the link between GM dysbiosis and the brain.

TBI is another condition compromising the GBA. Preliminary evidence on non-ICU patients shows that primary brain damage compromises the vagal nuclei and tractus solitarius nucleus [40], possibly leading to dysautonomia in the gastrointestinal tract and leaky-gut occurrence, which in turn affects BBB's permeability, reduces intestinal motility and leads to immune system dysregulation, as shown in a rat study [41].

The gut–heart axis

The gut–heart axis is bidirectional. Beneficial microbial metabolites like SCFAs and uremic toxins (UT) wire this connection [42, 43]. Dysbiosis and, consequently, downregulated production of SCFAs concomitant to a high level of UT negatively affect the gut–heart axis. In this context, lower SCFAs and higher UT production have been observed. This is accompanied by increased absorption of lipopolysaccharide and endotoxin due to epithelial dysfunction, which ultimately triggers the systemic inflammatory response. This sequence of events facilitates the development of atherosclerosis and heart failure (HF) (reviewed in [44]). Conversely, it has been shown that HF causes dysbiosis, which promotes intestinal barrier damage, impairs nutrient absorption, and primes a vicious cycle leading to harmful microbial product translocation into systemic circulation, further aggravating HF [45,46,47]. Indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (PCS), UT derived from tryptophan and tyrosine fermentation, play a key role in this context. They promote fibrosis in klotho deficient and wild-type mice, negatively affecting heart and kidney function [48, 49]. Moreover, GF mice have less angiotensin II-induced hypertension and cardiac fibrosis than conventionally raised mice [50]. Observational data in patients with HF show decreased intestinal blood flow [46] and edema in the terminal ileum and colon [45], which lead to a change in the GM composition, with enrichment of Campylobacter, Shigella, and Salmonella [47]. Several HF therapeutic strategies targeting the GM, such as probiotic supplementation and diets, are being preclinically and clinically tested. In a rat ischemia–reperfusion model, probiotics administration reduces myocardial infarct size and remodeling [51].In a pilot human trial, Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation in HF patients improved left ventricular fraction and decreased left atrium diameter[52]. However, data are controversial so far, possibly because not all subjects included in these studies present with different grades of dysbiosis. The gutHeart trial studying GM manipulation to treat HF did not confirm the previous findings, possibly due to the lack of substantial dysbiosis in the enrolled patients[53].

A high-fiber diet prevents hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in hypertensive mice by reshaping the intestinal microbial community GM and increasing the abundance of acetate-producing bacteria [54]. Similarly, a plant-based diet rich in complex carbohydrates and fibers while low in fat reduces HF events in both men [55] and women [56], improving arterial compliance, exercise endurance, and quality of life [57]. Choline is another soluble nutrient linked to HF. HF is worse in wild-type mice fed choline-supplemented diets [58]. Certain gut bacteria, such as Enterobacteriaceae[59], can metabolize choline to trimethylamine (TMA). TMA should remain in the intestine; however, in a condition of leaky-gut secondary to other pathological conditions, TMA can translocate to the liver, where it is converted to trimethylamineN­oxide (TMAO), causing liver [60, 61] and heart damage [58]. Dysbiosis also promotes atherosclerosis. In fact, GF ApoE-deficient mice fed a low-cholesterol diet have more atherosclerosis plaques than conventionally raised mice [62]. However, when administered with Akkermansia muciniphila, which prevents endotoxemia-induced inflammation, they present with smaller atherosclerotic plaques [63].

As the emerging data show the contribution of the GM in the onset or progression of heart diseases and preclinical studies start to lay the foundation of interventions, data on the potential of these strategies in critically ill patients are lacking.

The gut–lung axis

Evidence suggests that the lung and gut also communicate with each other, and complex pathways between their cognate microbiota strengthen the gut–lung axis (GLA). Neonatal gut dysbiosis with reduced Bifidobacteria, Akkermansia, and Faecalibacteria may cause CD4+ T cell dysfunction associated with childhood atopy and asthma [64]. IBD patients carry a higher risk of pulmonary diseases. In fact, IBD patients commonly have small and large airway dysfunction, obstructive and interstitial pulmonary diseases [65, 66] and, even when asymptomatic, may display early respiratory symptoms that could lead to bronchiectasis, mosaic perfusion, and air trapping, indicating obliterative bronchiolitis and centrilobular nodules and bronchial linear opacities bronchiolitis or bronchiectasis with mucoid secretion [67, 68]. Early after colectomy, several IBD patients developed respiratory symptoms. No bacterial pathogens were identified in these patients' sputum cultures, and corticosteroid therapy was required, suggesting a pulmonary impairment due to inflammation and not infection [69].

SCFAs may act as anti-inflammatory molecules and barrier keepers in the respiratory tract [70]. Mice administered with high-fiber diets display high intestinal SCFAs levels [71]. No SCFAs were found in lung tissue, but their levels promoted dendritic cell hematopoiesis and activated T helper 2 effector cells in the airways, establishing a de facto gut–bone marrow-lung axis protecting mice from allergic lung inflammation [71]. Wild-type mice depleted of GM with antibiotics, subsequently intranasally infected with pneumococcal pneumonia and then subjected to fecal microbiotal transplantation have an enhanced primary alveolar macrophage function thanks to a GM beneficial reshape [72].

The GLA could be a route for gut-to-lung bacterial migration. In a recent case–control study, Klebsiella and Enterococcus physically translocated to the bloodstream and pulmonary system, causing sepsis with disruption of GM diversity and enrichment of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which led to secondary bloodstream and abdominal infections [73]. Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) could also be linked to GM dysbiosis as ARDS patients present enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae in the gut and lung while displaying lower bacterial diversity [74].

The gut–kidney axis

A dysbalanced GM has also been associated with kidney diseases, including acute kidney injury (AKI) [reviewed in [75]] and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [76]. UT, SCFAs, and D-serine establish the so-called gut–kidney axis. Abnormal levels of IS, PCS, and TMA contribute to the onset of renal tubular cell dysfunction, pruritus, fatigue, neurological damage, coagulation and endothelial dysfunction, mineral bone disorder, cardiovascular impairment, and insulin resistance, especially in patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) [77]. Renal failure leads to higher urea concentration in both blood and intestine. This cause an overgrowth of intestinal bacteria owning urease activity, converting urea to ammonia [78], leading to dysbiosis. Patients with CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) subjected to hemodialysis display enrichment of the genus Faecalibacterium and the families Bifidobacteriaceae and Prevotellaceae. Conversely, in ESRD patients subjected to peritoneal dialysis, the Escherichiagenusand Enterobacteriaceae-Enterococcaceae families are predominant [79].UT also accumulate in AKI, but the underlying cause of this association remains uncovered [80].

Kidneys also express SCFAs receptors[81]. The olfactory receptor 78 (Olfr78) is a renal SCFA receptor, which promotes renin secretion. In experimental murine AKI models, butyrate decreases the production of reactive oxygen species and several pro-inflammatory cytokines [74] and exerts direct epigenetic activities by inhibiting histone deacetylases involved in the progression of glomerulopathies [82]. Renal Toll-like receptor-4mRNA levels are lower in mice supplemented with SCFAs, and inflammation is tampered [83]. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 supplementation in mice previously subjected to bilateral renal ischemia–reperfusion injury attenuates AKI severity by modulating the inflammatory-immune response [84].

Free D-aminoacids are produced by bacteria in mice [85] and play a role in the physiology of several organs, including the kidneys. In fact, AKI-associated dysbiosis in mice leads to a lower D-serine associated with kidney injury aggravation [85]. Oral administration of D-serine alleviated renal damage pointing to D-serine’s renoprotective properties [85]. In the same study, authors have also shown a direct correlation between impaired kidney function in AKI patients and D-serine levels [83]. Despite the lack of mechanism of this association, these data suggest that D-serine levels could be a biomarker for AKI patients.

The gut–liver axis

The portal vein, biliary tree, and systemic circulation connect the gut and liver. The liver interacts with the intestine by producing bile acids (BAs)[86], while the intestine interacts with the liver by metabolizing BAs, aminoacids, and exogenous components like alcohol and choline [87]. Dietary molecules, xenobiotics, free fatty acids, choline, and ethanol metabolites in the bloodstream reinforce this crosstalk [88]. Several signaling cues go through GM metabolism. In fact, gut dysbiosis contributes to several gut–liver conditions. Enterococcus faecalis contributes to alcoholic liver disease (ALD) [89], Klebsiella pneumonia to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [90], and Enterococcus gallinarum to autoimmune hepatitis [91] pathogenesis.

BAs aid in the absorption of dietary fats and fat-soluble vitamins in the small intestine [92, 93] and act as signaling molecules by binding to the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and G protein­coupled bile acid receptor 1 [94]. This triggers molecular events impacting their own hepatic synthesis(via the action of the FXR-FGF19 duo) and glucose and lipid homeostasis [94]. As BAs and GM communicate with each other, disrupting this delicate balance can lead to intestinal barrier impairment, inflammation, and even contribute to cancer onset and development. A damaged intestinal barrier allows bacteria to enter the portal vein and reach the liver, exacerbating liver [95] and intestinal diseases [96]. Akkermansia muciniphila, a gram-negative anaerobe colonizing intestinal mucus, is decreased in liver damage [97]. In this respect, bile duct ligated mice in which BA-FXR physiology is restored via the administration of a semisynthetic BA and FXR ligand, display a restored gut barrier integrity and Akkermansia muciniphila enrichment [96]. Loss of barrier caused by pathogenic bacteria disrupting epithelial integrity can lead to sepsis by triggering systemic inflammation (reviewed in [98]), and, in turn, sepsis increases the risk of liver damage [99]. Intriguingly, these studies suggest that sepsis-induced liver damage could potentially be prevented by harnessing the GM in ICU septic patients.

SCFAs and LCFAs are gut–liver messengers. Studies in rodents have shown that reducing SCFAs increases intestinal permeability [100] while reducing LCFAs decreases luminal Lactobacilli [101]. Supplementation with Lactobacillus spp. probiotics in animal models improves intestinal barrier integrity, inhibits colonization of infectious bacteria like Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens, Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Yersinia, and eases intestinal inflammation [102, 103].

Choline is metabolized into lecithin, contributing to VLDL hepatic excretion. Low choline may cause hepatic steatosis [104,105,106]. Lecithin levels depend on the host's choline-to-lecithin conversion. Any impairment in enterocyte metabolism could harm the liver by reducing lecithin supply. Personalized nutrition could slow the choline-TMAO pathway to prevent liver damage [60, 61, 107, 108].

Acute (caused by toxins or infections without underlying liver disease) or chronic (caused by pre-existing liver disease) liver dysfunction is common in ICU [reviewed in [109]]. No study has explored preventing or treating liver dysfunction in the ICU using GM modulators. Previous research on the adjuvant benefits of probiotics/prebiotics/symbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and bacteriophages in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [110, 111] and ALD [89, 112] could lay the groundwork for their future employment in other clinical contexts.

Harnessing the microbiota in critically ill patients

Despite the emerging data, there is a lack of human studies, especially on critically ill patients, and the available data should be expanded and validated in clinical trials. Moreover, a further effort to address biomarker discovery should be made in this field, as indicated by the potential shown by TMAO and D-serine. GM manipulation could be used as an adjuvant strategy in some comorbidities rising in critically ill patients. An overview of the current preclinical and clinical trials with grade of evidence with potential application to the ICU is provided in Table 1. Moreover, we propose a potential strategy (Fig. 3), where nutrition is the first and easiest step in managing dysbiosis in ICU patients, followed by probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, beta-lactamase, absorbent charcoal administration, and, finally, FMT. These treatments require validation with a high level of evidence before they can be routinely applied in ICU. They must be used with extreme caution aiming for a tailored approach to the patient with ideal efficacy and safety.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Potential personalized approach for treating dysbiosis in ICU patients

Full size image
Table 1 Overview of the current preclinical and clinical trials with grade of evidence with potential application to the ICU
Full size table

Nutrition

Different dietary patterns can modulate the GM in different ways. Quantity, quality, fiber content, and feeding patterns [141, 142] affect GM abundance and diversity [143]. ICU patients may undergo fasting or limited nutrition [144], resulting in dysbiosis [145]and compromised bacterial metabolite levels [4]. Nutrition in critical illness is a complex topic, and evidence is limited. Nevertheless, it has been observed that enteral nutrition (EN) benefits the GM more than parenteral nutrition (PN). PN raises Bacteroidetes levels and intestinal permeability in wild-type mice [146], while these effects are absent with EN [146]. GM is affected by the macronutrient-to-fiber ratio in EN formulas. A high protein and animal fat load will enrich GM Bacteroides, while carbohydrate-rich diets increase Prevotella strains [147]. Low fiber intake impacts gut epithelium integrity, mucus layer thickness, and the enrichment of pathogenic strains [148]. EN should be preferred over PN to preserve intestinal barrier integrity, prevent villi atrophy, and promote eubiosis, ultimately leading to lower mortality and morbidity [149] and fewer infectious complications [reviewed in [113]]. Anyhow, caution should be taken in formula selection. It has been observed that mice fed dietary emulsifiers show an imbalanced GM linked to colitis and metabolic syndrome [150]. Since EN formulas include preservatives and emulsifiers, like soy lecithin and glycerol derivates [151], they could potentially harm ICU patients.

Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics

Probiotics

Probiotics are live microorganisms that provide a health benefit to the host when supplemented in sufficient quantities [152]. Probiotics promote eubiosis, reduce gut cell apoptosis, and support the immune system [153,154,155].

A meta-analysis analyzing several trials in about 2.900 critically ill patients on probiotic use in the ICU reported that strains such as Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus spp., and Bifobacterium spp. are associated with a reduction in infections, particularly in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and treated with antibiotics, but not to increased survival [118]. Conversely, a more recent study did not confirm the beneficial role of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in reducing VAP incidence in ICU patients [156]. Another meta-analysis, which analyzed 4893 patients, has shown that probiotics reduce VAP, ICU length of stay, and duration of antibiotic therapy; however, the high variability in treatments and type of patients prevents the introduction of the use of probiotics as VAP prophylaxis [116]. Other positive effects of probiotics in specific patient subgroups, such as polytrauma patients, include improvement in clinical conditions, less use of vasopressors, reduction in the "sequential organ failure assessment" (SOFA) score, and a shorter ICU stay [157]. In particular, four probiotic preparations in polytrauma patients under mechanical ventilation lowered the incidence of VAP from 23.8% in the placebo group to 11.9% in the interventional group [157].

Three more meta-analyses analyzing the use of probiotics in critically ill patients to prevent VAP or mortality and ICU-acquired infections were recently published [117, 158, 159]. Consistently, authors concluded that probiotics administration is safe and beneficial and leads to a decrease in the incidence of ICU infections, notably VAP, whose prevention was the most effective in trauma patients. Conversely, the largest network meta-analysis, including 8339 patients from 31 RCTs, advocates that the safety of probiotics should be further studied, especially in critically ill patients, as in some cases, high dosages have been linked to an increase in infection complications such as sepsis, pneumonia, abscesses, and endocarditis due to bacteremia and fungemia [117].

Other potential indications for probiotics in ICU include sepsis, TBI, and, most recently, SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since 2007, the gut has been conceptualized as a "motor" that, when impaired, could drive systemic inflammation and multiple organ failure [160]. Experimental evidence point to Faecalibacterium prausnitzii as a probiotic strain potentially blunting systemic inflammation during sepsis as it produces an anti-inflammatory peptide that can counteract chemically induced colitis in mice [119]. Moreover, daily oral intake of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium longum has been shown to reduce mortality and improve intestinal epithelial homeostasis in a murine model of septic peritonitis [120]. Probiotics could also be a valid asset in TBI, as shown in mice subjected to traumatic spinal cord injury and supplemented with VSL#3, a mixture of eight bacterial strains [161]. This intervention supported mice's immune response in the gut and better locomotor recovery, improving post-injury outcomes [127].

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has impacted every field of medicine, including intensive care, where each virus variant has differently affected critically ill patients [162]. The role of probiotics in infected patients in intensive wards has not been systematically explored. However, their supplementation could influence the host's immune response [163]. Clinical trials studying the effect of probiotic supplementation in SARS-CoV-2 patients are ongoing or have recently been completed [121,122,123,124,125,126]. Emerging evidence points to the modulation of the immune function and reduction of secondary infections achieved by probiotics supplementation [164].

Next-generation probiotics are in development. SER-109 is obtained by transplanting fecal microbiota with alcohol-triggered massive sporulation. This new probiotic reduces the risk of recurrent Clostridium Difficile infection (RCDI) in patients treated with antibiotics per guidelines [128].

Prebiotics and synbiotics

Prebiotics are specific nutrients for intestinal bacteria, while synbiotics combine prebiotics and probiotics. They can both be administered to modulate the GM [2]. A meta-analysis has shown that there is no difference in the incidence of infections in ICU patients between using probiotics alone or synbiotics [118]. Conversely, in VAP, synbiotics supplementation seems to produce a more significant benefit, like reducing infection rates, than probiotic supplementation alone [116, 117].

Despite the emerging evidence on harnessing the GM through the use of nutrition, pro-, pre-, and symbiotics, the fine mechanisms describing the published observation are still lacking, and this complicates the translation from bench to bedside. Moreover, caution should be taken. Studies on safety are imperative as these strategies do not come without pitfalls, as demonstrated by a recent retrospective study showing a correlation between probiotic administration and an increase in probiotic-associated central line infections leading to increased mortality [165].

Beta-lactamase

GM changes in ICU patients are mostly due to broad-spectrum antibiotics, but not all induce dysbiosis [2]. Antibiotic stewardship includes switching from broad-spectrum molecules to a narrower spectrum and shortening antibiotic therapy whenever possible [166]. The use of beta-lactamase in dogs treated with ampicillin lowered its jejunal concentration and prevented it from reaching the colon [167]. This approach could lessen antibiotics' negative effects on the colonic microbial community. Ribaxamase (formerly SYN-004), an orally administered beta-lactamase with IV penicillins and cephalosporin, has shown promising results in preventing dysbiosis in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections treated with ceftriaxone [129]. A phase-2b study has shown a RCDI risk reduction in the interventional group [129]. This reduction occurred with macrolide plus ceftriaxone or ceftriaxone alone [129]. Ribaxamase is also effective when administered with beta-lactamase inhibitors like tazobactam and sulbactam [168]. Moreover, a phase-1b/2a clinical trial study to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered SYN-004 in adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is also ongoing [130].

Adsorbent charcoal

The use of adsorbent charcoal is an additional approach to prevent antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Dav-132 is a charcoal-based adsorbent that is actively studied [169]. It was developed for oncological patients for whom therapy is mandatory to prevent infections. Dav-132 is designed to become active in the ileum, cecum and colon before antibiotics could start impairing the GM [169, 170]. A phase-2 trial has confirmed that Dav-132 can be safely used in patients as it is well tolerated and promotes GM diversity by improving Clostridioides difficile colonization resistance [115]. Notably, a study on hamsters with moxifloxacin-induced Clostridioides difficile infection showed that a modified version of Dav-132 suitable for mice, namely Dav-131, could reduce mortality in a dose-dependent manner by lowering the fecal-free moxifloxacin concentration [114]. Therefore, despite lack of studies in critical illness, Dav-132 could potentially be an additional tool, together with probiotics administration, to reduce RCDI incidence and progression risks in ICU patients.

Fecal microbiota transplantation

FMT is a medical technique in which stools from a "healthy" donor are delivered to a dysbiotic patient to restore eubiosis [2]. An FMT sample contains all microorganisms that naturally harbor in the gut and all their associated metabolites. For this reason, this treatment may restore dysbiosis better than others [171, 172]. However, this procedure does not come without risks. In fact, undesired and/or undetected pathogens could also be delivered from the donor to the recipient subject, sometimes even with fatal complications. In a case report, two patients developed drug-resistant E. coli bacteremia following FMT, causing one death [173]. Therefore, extreme caution should be taken, especially in critically ill patients with a higher risk of infection. In 2017, a panel of experts from the European Consensus Conference drafted FMT recommendations [132]. To date, the main indication for FMT is recurrent RCDI infection, where efficacy is superior to antibiotics [132, 174].

However, its application is currently being trialed in other conditions and could potentially be studied in critically ill patients [175], particularly to eradicate intestinal MDRO burden [176] and manage ICU common illnesses such as TBI [138], sepsis and multi-organ failure (MOF) [177].

A group of patients affected by RCDI with dysbiosis and severe gastrointestinal symptoms improved significantly after FMT, possibly via increased resistance MDROs’ gut colonization [176]. Intriguingly, FMT for sepsis has also been successfully used in patients with septic shock of undetermined cause with profuse diarrhea or diarrhea associated with antibiotic administration [139, 140]. FMT has been shown to promote eubiosis in a mouse model in which sepsis was induced post-administration of stool collected from a septic patient [177].

FMT has also been studied in TBI, which causes autonomic dysregulation, impaired BBB integrity, intestinal mucosal impairment, and brain immunity dysregulation. A recent study evaluated the effect of FMT following TBI in rats with a controlled cortical impact model, showing that this strategy could effectively restore eubiosis and resolve neurological deficits [138].

The emerging literature represents a great starting point for the exploitation of FMT in different ICU conditions and complications. Although European guidelines to regulate the use of FMT are in place, targeted RCTs should be initiated to explore the safety and efficacy of this procedure in the ICU without putting patients at risk of post-antibiotic discontinuation, a key step in FMT protocols. Rehorová et al. proposed an experimental standardized operating procedure for FMT in critically ill patients using a two-month-quarantined frozen multi-donor transplant administered by enema (seven donors, 50 ml from each donor to make a final graft of 350 ml). FMT should be done 48 h after the last antibiotic to maximize engraftment. Due to safety concerns, new studies should only include hemodynamically stable patients without perforated viscous or immunoparalysis [12].

Conclusions

Recent evidence has shown that critically ill patients display a changed GM, known as pathobiota. The pathobiota composition is one of the leading causes of clinical complications. Metagenomic and meta-metabolomic studies are growing and dissecting mechanisms leading to dysbiosis in different ICU conditions. Harnessing the GM in ICU patients is intriguing, and this review summarizes the currently available results and outlines potential strategies for critically ill patients. Targeting intestinal bacteria has the potential to preserve or restore barrier integrity, which would then prime a beneficial cascade on the organ dysfunctions arising in ICU patients. New studies designed for critically ill patients should reinforce the current evidence, such as preventing VAP by probiotics, treating RCDI and MDRO colonization by FMT, preventing and resolving dysbiosis by personalized nutrition and antibiotic “damage control” tools, and have the potential to uncover critical biomarkers, stratify patients according to infection risk, immune response and inflammation status, and identify combination therapy/adjuvant responders vs. non-responders. Intensivists juggle the multiple connections between the intestine and the rest of the body. Unraveling this communication could transform them into modern "enterointensivists" at the front line of critical care management, placing the intestine at the center of critically ill patients as a "jack of all trades" card.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ALD:

Alcoholic liver disease

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BAs:

Bile acids

BBB:

Blood–brain barrier

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

COVID-19:

The coronavirus disease 2019

EN:

Enteral nutrition

ESRD:

End-stage renal disease

FGF-19:

Fibroblast growth factor 19

FMT:

Fecal microbiota transplantation

FXR:

Farnesoid X receptor

GBA:

Gut–brain axis

GM:

Gut microbiota

GF:

Germ-free

HF:

Heart failure

IBD:

Intestinal bowel disease

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IS:

Indoxyl sulfate

LCFAs:

Long-chain fatty acids

MDROs:

Multidrug resistant bacteria

PCS:

P-cresyl sulfate

PN:

Parenteral nutrition

RCDI:

Recurrent clostridioides difficile infection

SCFAs:

Short-chain fatty acids

SOFAscore:

Sequential organ failure assessment score

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

TMA:

Trimethylamine

TMAO:

TrimethylamineN­oxide

UT:

Uremic toxins

VAP:

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

References

  1. Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLOS Biol. 2016;14(8): e1002533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Szychowiak P, Villageois-Tran K, Patrier J, Timsit JF, Ruppé É. The role of the microbiota in the management of intensive care patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ursell LK, Metcalf JL, Parfrey LW, Knight R. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(Suppl 1):S38-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolff NS, Hugenholtz F, Wiersinga WJ. The emerging role of the microbiota in the ICU. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rinninella E, Cintoni M, Raoul P, Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F, Pulcini G, et al. Food components and dietary habits: keys for a healthy gut microbiota composition. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajilić-Stojanović M, de Vos WM. The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38(5):996–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inchingolo AD, Malcangi G, Inchingolo AM, Piras F, Settanni V, Garofoli G, et al. Benefits and implications of resveratrol supplementation on microbiota modulations: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):4027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Knight R, Gordon JI. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1(6):6ra14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stedtfeld RD, Chai B, Crawford RB, Stedtfeld TM, Williams MR, Xiangwen S, et al. Modulatory Influence of Segmented Filamentous Bacteria on Transcriptomic Response of Gnotobiotic Mice Exposed to TCDD. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Oct 24];8. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles//10.3389/fmicb.2017.01708

  10. Wu H, Tremaroli V, Schmidt C, Lundqvist A, Olsson LM, Krämer M, et al. The Gut Microbiota in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Cell Metab. 2020;32(3):379-390.e3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang X, Yang Y, Su J, Zheng X, Wang C, Chen S, et al. Age-related compositional changes and correlations of gut microbiome, serum metabolome, and immune factor in rats. GeroScience. 2021;43(2):709–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Řehořová V, Cibulková I, Soukupová H, Duška F. Multi-donor fecal microbial transplantation for critically Ill patients: rationale and standard operating procedure. Future Pharmacol. 2022;2(1):55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayakawa M, Asahara T, Henzan N, Murakami H, Yamamoto H, Mukai N, et al. Dramatic changes of the gut flora immediately after severe and sudden insults. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(8):2361–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lankelma JM, van Vught LA, Belzer C, Schultz MJ, van der Poll T, de Vos WM, et al. Critically ill patients demonstrate large interpersonal variation in intestinal microbiota dysregulation: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(1):59–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McDonald D, Ackermann G, Khailova L, Baird C, Heyland D, Kozar R, et al. Extreme dysbiosis of the microbiome in critical illness. mSphere. 2016;1(4):0e00199-16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wischmeyer PE, McDonald D, Knight R. Role of the microbiome, probiotics, and ‘dysbiosis therapy’ in critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016;22(4):347–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zaborin A, Smith D, Garfield K, Quensen J, Shakhsheer B, Kade M, et al. Membership and behavior of ultra-low-diversity pathogen communities present in the gut of humans during prolonged critical illness. MBio. 2014;5(5):e01361-e11314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sokol H, Pigneur B, Watterlot L, Lakhdari O, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Gratadoux JJ, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(43):16731–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krezalek MA, DeFazio J, Zaborina O, Zaborin A, Alverdy JC. The shift of an intestinal “microbiome” to a “pathobiome” governs the course and outcome of sepsis following surgical injury. Shock Augusta Ga. 2016;45(5):475–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buffie CG, Pamer EG. Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance against intestinal pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(11):790–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dickson RP. The microbiome and critical illness. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(1):59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rutsch A, Kantsjö JB, Ronchi F. The Gut-Brain Axis: How Microbiota and Host Inflammasome Influence Brain Physiology and Pathology. Front Immunol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Jul 12];11. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.604179

  23. Pärtty A, Kalliomäki M, Wacklin P, Salminen S, Isolauri E. A possible link between early probiotic intervention and the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders later in childhood: a randomized trial. Pediatr Res. 2015;77(6):823–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrara M, Bertozzi G, Zanza C, Longhitano Y, Piccolella F, Lauritano CE, et al. Traumatic Brain Injury and Gut Brain Axis: The Disruption of an Alliance. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2022 Jun 22;

  25. Giridharan VV, Generoso JS, Lence L, Candiotto G, Streck E, Petronilho F, et al. A crosstalk between gut and brain in sepsis-induced cognitive decline. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19(1):114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fang H, Wang Y, Deng J, Zhang H, Wu Q, He L, et al. Sepsis-induced gut dysbiosis mediates the susceptibility to sepsis-associated encephalopathy in mice. mSystems. 2022;7(3):e01399-e1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu XN, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004;558(Pt 1):263–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Furness JB. Enteric nervous system. Scholarpedia. 2007;2(10):4064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, Shastri GG, Ann P, Ma L, et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell. 2015;161(2):264–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Berger M, Gray JA, Roth BL. The expanded biology of serotonin. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:355–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Erspamer V, Testini A. Observations on the release and turnover rate of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the gastrointestinal tract. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1959;11(1):618–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bertaccini G. Tissue 5-hydroxytryptamine and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid after partial or total removal of the gastro-intestinal tract in the rat. J Physiol. 1960;153(2):239–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Braniste V, Al-Asmakh M, Kowal C, Anuar F, Abbaspour A, Tóth M, et al. The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci Transl Med [Internet]. 2014 Nov 19 [cited 2022 Jul 14];6(263). Available from: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.3009759

  34. Oleskin AV, Shenderov BA. Neuromodulatory effects and targets of the SCFAs and gasotransmitters produced by the human symbiotic microbiota. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2016;27:30971.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wong ML, Inserra A, Lewis MD, Mastronardi CA, Leong L, Choo J, et al. Inflammasome signaling affects anxiety- and depressive-like behavior and gut microbiome composition. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):797–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Govindarajan V, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Keane RW. Role of inflammasomes in multiple sclerosis and their potential as therapeutic targets. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bai H, Zhang Q. Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome and Onset of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Immunol [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 13];12. Available from:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.701282

  38. Yan YQ, Fang Y, Zheng R, Pu JL, Zhang BR. NLRP3 inflammasomes in Parkinson’s disease and their Regulation by Parkin. Neuroscience. 2020;15(446):323–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shen Y, Qian L, Luo H, Li X, Ruan Y, Fan R, et al. The significance of NLRP inflammasome in neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain Sci. 2022;12(8):1057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Baguley IJ, Heriseanu RE, Nott MT, Chapman J, Sandanam J. Dysautonomia after severe traumatic brain injury: evidence of persisting overresponsiveness to afferent stimuli. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(8):615–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hang CH, Shi JX, Li JS, Wu W, Li WQ, Yin HX. Levels of vasoactive intestinal peptide, cholecystokinin and calcitonin gene-related peptide in plasma and jejunum of rats following traumatic brain injury and underlying significance in gastrointestinal dysfunction. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(6):875–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Devlin AS, Marcobal A, Dodd D, Nayfach S, Plummer N, Meyer T, et al. Modulation of a circulating uremic solute via rational genetic manipulation of the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(6):709–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown JM, Hazen SL. The gut microbial endocrine organ: bacterially derived signals driving cardiometabolic diseases. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66(1):343–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kamo T, Akazawa H, Suzuki JI, Komuro I. Novel Concept of a heart-gut axis in the pathophysiology of heart failure. Korean Circ J. 2017;47(5):663–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sandek A, Bauditz J, Swidsinski A, Buhner S, Weber-Eibel J, von Haehling S, et al. Altered intestinal function in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(16):1561–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sandek A, Swidsinski A, Schroedl W, Watson A, Valentova M, Herrmann R, et al. Intestinal blood flow in patients with chronic heart failure: a link with bacterial growth, gastrointestinal symptoms, and cachexia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(11):1092–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pasini E, Aquilani R, Testa C, Baiardi P, Angioletti S, Boschi F, et al. Pathogenic gut flora in patients with chronic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(3):220–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang K, Wang C, Nie L, Zhao X, Gu J, Guan X, et al. Klotho protects against indoxyl sulphate-induced myocardial hypertrophy. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 2015;26(10):2434–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, Koeth R, Levison BS, Dugar B, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472(7341):57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Karbach SH, Schönfelder T, Brandão I, Wilms E, Hörmann N, Jäckel S, et al. Gut microbiota promote angiotensin Ii–induced arterial hypertension and vascular dysfunction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(9): e003698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gan XT, Ettinger G, Huang CX, Burton JP, Haist JV, Rajapurohitam V, et al. Probiotic administration attenuates myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure after myocardial infarction in the rat. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7(3):491–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Costanza AC, Moscavitch SD, Faria Neto HCC, Mesquita ET. Probiotic therapy with Saccharomyces boulardii for heart failure patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Int J Cardiol. 2015;20(179):348–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Awoyemi A, Mayerhofer C, Felix AS, Hov JR, Moscavitch SD, Lappegård KT, et al. Rifaximin or Saccharomyces boulardii in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Results from the randomized GutHeart trial. eBioMedicine [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Oct 23];70. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(21)00304-2/fulltext

  54. Marques FZ, Nelson E, Chu PY, Horlock D, Fiedler A, Ziemann M, et al. High-fiber diet and acetate supplementation change the gut microbiota and prevent the development of hypertension and heart failure in hypertensive mice. Circulation. 2017;135(10):964–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Levitan EB, Wolk A, Mittleman MA. Relation of consistency with the dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet and incidence of heart failure in men aged 45 to 79 years. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(10):1416–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Levitan EB, Wolk A, Mittleman MA. Consistency with the DASH diet and incidence of heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):851–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rifai L, Pisano C, Hayden J, Sulo S, Silver MA. Impact of the DASH diet on endothelial function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2015;28(2):151–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Organ CL, Otsuka H, Bhushan S, Wang Z, Bradley J, Trivedi R, et al. Choline diet and its gut microbe-derived metabolite, trimethylamine N-oxide, exacerbate pressure overload-induced heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(1): e002314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dyer FE, Wood AJ. Action of enterobacteriaceae on choline and related compounds. J Fish Res Board Can. 1947;7(1):17–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen YM, Liu Y, Zhou RF, Chen XL, Wang C, Tan XY, et al. Associations of gut-flora-dependent metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide, betaine and choline with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19076.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Spencer MD, Hamp TJ, Reid RW, Fischer LM, Zeisel SH, Fodor AA. Association between composition of the human gastrointestinal microbiome and development of fatty liver with choline deficiency. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(3):976–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Stepankova R, Tonar Z, Bartova J, Nedorost L, Rossman P, Poledne R, et al. Absence of microbiota (germ-free conditions) accelerates the atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice fed standard low cholesterol diet. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010;17(8):796–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Li J, Lin S, Vanhoutte PM, Woo CW, Xu A. Akkermansia Muciniphila Protects against atherosclerosis by preventing metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in Apoe −/− Mice. Circulation. 2016;133(24):2434–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Fujimura KE, Sitarik AR, Havstad S, Lin DL, Levan S, Fadrosh D, et al. Neonatal gut microbiota associates with childhood multisensitized atopy and T cell differentiation. Nat Med. 2016;22(10):1187–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Yazar A, Atis S, Konca K, Pata C, Akbay E, Calikoglu M, et al. Respiratory symptoms and pulmonary functional changes in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(5):1511–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kraft SC, Earle RH, Roesler M, Esterly JR. Unexplained bronchopulmonary disease with inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Intern Med. 1976;136(4):454–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Ward H, Fisher KL, Waghray R, Wright JL, Card SE, Cockcroft DW. Constrictive bronchiolitis and ulcerative colitis. Can Respir J. 1999;6(2):197–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Storch I, Sachar D, Katz S. Pulmonary manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2003;9(2):104–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Eaton TE, Lambie N, Wells AU. Bronchiectasis following colectomy for Crohn’s disease. Thorax. 1998;53(6):529–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Maslowski KM, Vieira AT, Ng A, Kranich J, Sierro F, Yu D, et al. Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1282–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K, Sichelstiel AK, Sprenger N, Ngom-Bru C, et al. Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med. 2014;20(2):159–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Schuijt TJ, Lankelma JM, Scicluna BP, de Sousa e Melo F, Roelofs JJTH, de Boer JD, et al. The gut microbiota plays a protective role in the host defence against pneumococcal pneumonia. Gut. 2016;65(4):575–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Mu S, Xiang H, Wang Y, Wei W, Long X, Han Y, et al. The pathogens of secondary infection in septic patients share a similar genotype to those that predominate in the gut. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2022;26(1):68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Kyo M, Nishioka K, Nakaya T, Kida Y, Tanabe Y, Ohshimo S, et al. Unique patterns of lower respiratory tract microbiota are associated with inflammation and hospital mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Noel S, Martina-Lingua MN, Bandapalle S, Pluznick J, Hamad ARA, Peterson DA, et al. Intestinal microbiota-kidney cross talk in acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;127(1–4):139–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Borges NA, Stenvinkel P, Bergman P, Qureshi AR, Lindholm B, Moraes C, et al. Effects of probiotic supplementation on trimethylamine-N-oxide plasma levels in hemodialysis patients: a pilot study. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2019;11(2):648–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Missailidis C, Hällqvist J, Qureshi AR, Barany P, Heimbürger O, Lindholm B, et al. Serum trimethylamine-N-oxide is strongly related to renal function and predicts outcome in chronic kidney disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1): e0141738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wong J, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, Pahl M, Andersen GL, Vaziri ND. Expansion of urease- and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short-chain fatty acid-producing intestinal microbiota in ESRD. Am J Nephrol. 2014;39(3):230–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Hu J, Zhong X, Yan J, Zhou D, Qin D, Xiao X, et al. High-throughput sequencing analysis of intestinal flora changes in ESRD and CKD patients. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Wang W, Hao G, Pan Y, Ma S, Yang T, Shi P, et al. Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with mortality in hospital-acquired acute kidney injury: a prospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Pluznick JL, Protzko RJ, Gevorgyan H, Peterlin Z, Sipos A, Han J, et al. Olfactory receptor responding to gut microbiota-derived signals plays a role in renin secretion and blood pressure regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(11):4410–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Felizardo RJF, de Almeida DC, Pereira RL, Watanabe IKM, Doimo NTS, Ribeiro WR, et al. Gut microbial metabolite butyrate protects against proteinuric kidney disease through epigenetic- and GPR109a-mediated mechanisms. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2019;33(11):11894–908.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Andrade-Oliveira V, Amano MT, Correa-Costa M, Castoldi A, Felizardo RJF, de Almeida DC, et al. Gut bacteria products prevent AKI induced by ischemia-reperfusion. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 2015;26(8):1877–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Yang J, Ji GE, Park MS, Seong YJ, Go YS, Lee HY, et al. Probiotics partially attenuate the severity of acute kidney injury through an immunomodulatory effect. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2021;40(4):620–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Nakade Y, Iwata Y, Furuichi K, Mita M, Hamase K, Konno R, et al. Gut microbiota–derived D-serine protects against acute kidney injury. JCI Insight. 2018;3(20):e97957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Xie G, Zhong W, Li H, Li Q, Qiu Y, Zheng X, et al. Alteration of bile acid metabolism in the rat induced by chronic ethanol consumption. FASEB J. 2013;27(9):3583–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Chen P, Miyamoto Y, Mazagova M, Lee KC, Eckmann L, Schnabl B. Microbiota protects mice against acute alcohol-induced liver injury. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39(12):2313–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Xie G, Zhong W, Zheng X, Li Q, Qiu Y, Li H, et al. Chronic Ethanol consumption alters mammalian gastrointestinal content metabolites. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(7):3297–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Duan Y, Llorente C, Lang S, Brandl K, Chu H, Jiang L, et al. Bacteriophage targeting of gut bacterium attenuates alcoholic liver disease. Nature. 2019;575(7783):505–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Yuan J, Chen C, Cui J, Lu J, Yan C, Wei X, et al. Fatty Liver Disease Caused by High-Alcohol-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Cell Metab. 2019;30(4):675-688.e7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Manfredo Vieira S, Hiltensperger M, Kumar V, Zegarra-Ruiz D, Dehner C, Khan N, et al. Translocation of a gut pathobiont drives autoimmunity in mice and humans. Science. 2018;359(6380):1156–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Ishibashi S, Schwarz M, Frykman PK, Herz J, Russell DW. Disruption of cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene in mice. I. Postnatal lethality reversed by bile acid and vitamin supplementation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(30):18017–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Cheng JB, Jacquemin E, Gerhardt M, Nazer H, Cresteil D, Heubi JE, et al. Molecular genetics of 3beta-hydroxy-Delta5-C27-steroid oxidoreductase deficiency in 16 patients with loss of bile acid synthesis and liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(4):1833–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Gadaleta RM, Cariello M, Crudele L, Moschetta A. Bile salt hydrolase-competent probiotics in the management of IBD: unlocking the ‘Bile Acid Code.’ Nutrients. 2022;14(15):3212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Filliol A, Piquet-Pellorce C, Raguénès-Nicol C, Dion S, Farooq M, Lucas-Clerc C, et al. RIPK1 protects hepatocytes from Kupffer cells-mediated TNF-induced apoptosis in mouse models of PAMP-induced hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2017;66(6):1205–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Marzano M, Fosso B, Colliva C, Notario E, Passeri D, Intranuovo M, et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation by the novel agonist TC-100 (3α, 7α, 11β-Trihydroxy-6α-ethyl-5β-cholan-24-oic Acid) preserves the intestinal barrier integrity and promotes intestinal microbial reshaping in a mouse model of obstructed bile acid flow. Biomed Pharmacother Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153: 113380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Recovery of ethanol-induced Akkermansia muciniphila depletion ameliorates alcoholic liver disease | Gut [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Available from: https://gut.bmj.com/content/67/5/891

  98. Kang H, Thomas RM. Bacteria and sepsis: microbiome to the rescue? J Clin Med. 2021;10(16):3578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Brienza N, Dalfino L, Cinnella G, Diele C, Bruno F, Fiore T. Jaundice in critical illness: promoting factors of a concealed reality. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(2):267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Cresci GA, Glueck B, McMullen MR, Xin W, Allende D, Nagy LE. Prophylactic tributyrin treatment mitigates chronic-binge ethanol-induced intestinal barrier and liver injury. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(9):1587–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Chen P, Torralba M, Tan J, Embree M, Zengler K, Stärkel P, et al. Supplementation of saturated long-chain fatty acids maintains intestinal eubiosis and reduces ethanol-induced liver injury in mice. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(1):203-214.e16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Martín R, Chamignon C, Mhedbi-Hajri N, Chain F, Derrien M, Escribano-Vázquez U, et al. The potential probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 strain protects the intestinal barrier by stimulating both mucus production and cytoprotective response. Sci Rep. 2019;1(9):5398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Ahl D, Liu H, Schreiber O, Roos S, Phillipson M, Holm L. Lactobacillus reuteri increases mucus thickness and ameliorates dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Acta Physiol. 2016;217(4):300–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Buchman AL, Moukarzel A, Jenden DJ, Roch M, Rice K, Ament ME. Low plasma free choline is prevalent in patients receiving long term parenteral nutrition and is associated with hepatic aminotransferase abnormalities. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl. 1993;12(1):33–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Buchman AL, Dubin MD, Moukarzel AA, Jenden DJ, Roch M, Rice KM, et al. Choline deficiency: a cause of hepatic steatosis during parenteral nutrition that can be reversed with intravenous choline supplementation. Hepatol Baltim Md. 1995;22(5):1399–403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Marcolin E, Forgiarini LF, Tieppo J, Dias AS, de Freitas LAR, Marroni NP. Methionine- and choline-deficient diet induces hepatic changes characteristic of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Arq Gastroenterol. 2011;48(1):72–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Flores-Guerrero JL, Post A, van Dijk PR, Connelly MA, Garcia E, Navis G, et al. Circulating trimethylamine-N-oxide is associated with all-cause mortality in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int Off J Int Assoc Study Liver. 2021;41(10):2371–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Tan X, Liu Y, Long J, Chen S, Liao G, Wu S, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide aggravates liver steatosis through modulation of bile acid metabolism and inhibition of farnesoid X receptor signaling in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019;63(17): e1900257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Paugam-Burtz C, Levesque E, Louvet A, Thabut D, Amathieu R, Bureau C, et al. Management of liver failure in general intensive care unit. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020;39(1):143–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Famouri F, Shariat Z, Hashemipour M, Keikha M, Kelishadi R. Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(3):413–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Xue L, Deng Z, Luo W, He X, Chen Y. Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Cell Infect Microbiol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 25];12. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.759306

  112. Effects of probiotics (cultured Lactobacillus subtilis/Streptococcus faecium) in the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis: randomized-controlled multicenter study - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26302024/

  113. Elke G, van Zanten ARH, Lemieux M, McCall M, Jeejeebhoy KN, Kott M, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Burdet C, Sayah-Jeanne S, Nguyen TT, Miossec C, Saint-Lu N, Pulse M, et al. Protection of hamsters from mortality by reducing fecal moxifloxacin concentration with DAV131A in a model of moxifloxacin-induced clostridium difficile colitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(10):e00543-e617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Vehreschild MJGT, Ducher A, Louie T, Cornely OA, Feger C, Dane A, et al. An open randomized multicentre Phase 2 trial to assess the safety of DAV132 and its efficacy to protect gut microbiota diversity in hospitalized patients treated with fluoroquinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022;77(4):1155–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Cheema HA, Shahid A, Ayyan M, Mustafa B, Zahid A, Fatima M, et al. Probiotics for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Nutrients. 2022;14(8):1600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Li C, Lu F, Chen J, Ma J, Xu N. Probiotic supplementation prevents the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia for mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Nutr [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 29];9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.919156

  118. Manzanares W, Lemieux M, Langlois PL, Wischmeyer PE. Probiotic and synbiotic therapy in critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2016;19(19):262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Quévrain E, Maubert MA, Michon C, Chain F, Marquant R, Tailhades J, et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2016;65(3):415–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Khailova L, Frank DN, Dominguez JA, Wischmeyer PE. Probiotic administration reduces mortality and improves intestinal epithelial homeostasis in experimental sepsis. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(1):166–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Biosearch SA. Multicentric Study to Assess the Effect of Consumption of Lactobacillus Coryniformis K8 on Healthcare Personnel Exposed to COVID-19 [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2020 Apr [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Report No.: NCT04366180. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04366180

  122. Örebro University, Sweden. Exploratory Study on the Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response in Healthy Adults [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2021 Oct [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Report No.: NCT04734886. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04734886

  123. Duke University. A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Lactobacillus on the Microbiome of Household Contacts Exposed to COVID-19 [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2022 Feb [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Report No.: NCT04399252. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399252

  124. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. Efficacy of Probiotics (Lactobacillus Rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium Bifidum, Bifidobacterium Longum Subsp. Infantis and Bifidobacterium Longum) in the Treatment of Hospitalised Patients With Novel Coronavirus Infection [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2022 Jan [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Report No.: NCT04854941. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04854941

  125. Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM). Randomised Single Blinded Clinical Study of Efficacy of Intranasal Probiotic Treatment to Reduce Severity of Symptoms in COVID19 Infection [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2021 May [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Report No.: NCT04458519. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04458519

  126. AB Biotics, SA. Efficacy and Safety of Lactobacillus Plantarum and Pediococcus Acidilactici as Co-adjuvant Therapy for Reducing the Risk of Severe Disease in Adults With SARS-CoV-2 and Its Modulation of the Fecal Microbiota: A Randomized Clinical Trial [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2021 May [cited 2022 Aug 28]. Report No.: NCT04517422. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04517422

  127. Kigerl KA, Hall JCE, Wang L, Mo X, Yu Z, Popovich PG. Gut dysbiosis impairs recovery after spinal cord injury. J Exp Med. 2016;213(12):2603–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Feuerstadt P, Louie TJ, Lashner B, Wang EEL, Diao L, Bryant JA, et al. SER-109, an oral microbiome therapy for recurrent clostridioides difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(3):220–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Kokai-Kun J, Connelly S. Ribaxamase, an orally administered β-lactamase, protects the gut microbiome in patients treated with ceftriaxone. J Transl Sci [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 30];6(3). Available from: https://www.oatext.com/ribaxamase-an-orally-administered-v-lactamase-protects-the-gut-microbiome-in-patients-treated-with-ceftriaxone.php#gsc.tab=0

  130. Synthetic Biologics Inc. Phase 1b/2a Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of SYN-004 in Adult Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (Allo-HCT) Recipients [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2022 Apr [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Report No.: NCT04692181. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04692181

  131. Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N, Moore D, Price M, Sharma N, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(5):479–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Tilg H, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Kump P, Satokari R, et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2017;66(4):569–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Ianiro G, Masucci L, Quaranta G, Simonelli C, Lopetuso LR, Sanguinetti M, et al. Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy plus vancomycin for the treatment of severe refractory Clostridium difficile infection—single versus multiple infusions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(2):152–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Cheng YW, Phelps E, Nemes S, Rogers N, Sagi S, Bohm M, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant decreases mortality in patients with refractory severe or fulminant clostridioides difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(10):2234-2243.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Cheng YW, Xu H, Phelps E, Rogers N, Sagi S, Bohm M, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant decreases mortality in patients with refractory severe and severe complicatedclostridium difficileinfection not eligible for colectomy: 2017 fellows-in-training award (Colon Category): 100. Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol ACG. 2017;112:S48.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Fischer M, Sipe B, Cheng YW, Phelps E, Rogers N, Sagi S, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant in severe and severe-complicated Clostridium difficile: a promising treatment approach. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(3):289–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Hocquart M, Lagier JC, Cassir N, Saidani N, Eldin C, Kerbaj J, et al. Early fecal microbiota transplantation improves survival in severe clostridium difficile infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(5):645–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Du D, Tang W, Zhou C, Sun X, Wei Z, Zhong J, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation is a promising method to restore gut microbiota dysbiosis and relieve neurological deficits after traumatic brain injury. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:5816837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Li Q, Wang C, Tang C, He Q, Zhao X, Li N, et al. Therapeutic modulation and reestablishment of the intestinal microbiota with fecal microbiota transplantation resolves sepsis and diarrhea in a patient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(11):1832–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Wei Y, Yang J, Wang J, Yang Y, Huang J, Gong H, et al. Successful treatment with fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and diarrhea following severe sepsis. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2016;20(1):332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Kaczmarek JL, Musaad SM, Holscher HD. Time of day and eating behaviors are associated with the composition and function of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(5):1220–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Klingbeil E, de La Serre CB. Microbiota modulation by eating patterns and diet composition: impact on food intake. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018;315(6):R1254–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Oami T, Chihade DB, Coopersmith CM. The microbiome and nutrition in critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25(2):145–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, Jeejeebhoy K, Day AG, Dhaliwal R, et al. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(10):1728–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E, Gibson DL. Diet-induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease. Nutrients. 2012;4(8):1095–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Wan X, Bi J, Gao X, Tian F, Wang X, Li N, et al. Partial enteral nutrition preserves elements of gut barrier function, including innate immunity, intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) level, and intestinal microbiota in mice. Nutrients. 2015;7(8):6294–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C, Bittinger K, Chen YY, Keilbaugh SA, et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011;334(6052):105–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Valdes AM, Walter J, Segal E, Spector TD. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018;13(361): k2179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):48–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Chassaing B, Koren O, Goodrich JK, Poole AC, Srinivasan S, Ley RE, et al. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2015;519(7541):92–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Moron R, Galvez J, Colmenero M, Anderson P, Cabeza J, Rodriguez-Cabezas ME. The importance of the microbiome in critically ill patients: role of nutrition. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):3002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Kabeerdoss J, Devi RS, Mary RR, Prabhavathi D, Vidya R, Mechenro J, et al. Effect of yoghurt containing Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12®on faecal excretion of secretory immunoglobulin A and human beta-defensin 2 in healthy adult volunteers. Nutr J. 2011;10(1):138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Schlee M, Harder J, Köten B, Stange EF, Wehkamp J, Fellermann K. Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte β-defensin 2. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151(3):528–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Möndel M, Schroeder BO, Zimmermann K, Huber H, Nuding S, Beisner J, et al. Probiotic E. coli treatment mediates antimicrobial human β-defensin synthesis and fecal excretion in humans. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(2):166–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Johnstone J, Meade M, Lauzier F, Marshall J, Duan E, Dionne J, et al. Effect of probiotics on incident ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(11):1024–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Tsilika M, Thoma G, Aidoni Z, Tsaousi G, Fotiadis K, Stavrou G, et al. A four-probiotic preparation for ventilator-associated pneumonia in multi-trauma patients: results of a randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022;59(1): 106471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Lan SH, Hung SH, Chang SP, Lu LC, Lai CC, Lin WT. Pro-, pre- and synbiotics for the prevention of incidental ventilator-associated pneumonia among critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022;16:1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Alsuwaylihi AS, McCullough F. The safety and efficacy of probiotic supplementation for critically ill adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuac059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Clark JA, Coopersmith CM. Intestinal crosstalk—a new paradigm for understanding the gut as the “motor” of critical illness. Shock Augusta Ga. 2007;28(4):384–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. George AK, Behera J, Homme RP, Tyagi N, Tyagi SC, Singh M. Rebuilding microbiome for mitigating traumatic brain injury: importance of restructuring the gut-microbiome-brain axis. Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58(8):3614–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Corriero A, Ribezzi M, Mele F, Angrisani C, Romaniello F, Daleno A, et al. COVID-19 variants in critically Ill patients: a comparison of the delta and omicron variant profiles. Infect Dis Rep. 2022;14(3):492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Batista KS, de Albuquerque JG, de Vasconcelos MHA, Bezerra MLR, da Silva Barbalho MB, Pinheiro RO, et al. Probiotics and prebiotics: potential prevention and therapeutic target for nutritional management of COVID-19? Nutr Res Rev. 2021;20:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Nguyen QV, Chong LC, Hor YY, Lew LC, Rather IA, Choi SB. Role of probiotics in the management of COVID-19: a computational perspective. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Mayer S, Bonhag CM, Jenkins P, Cornett BT, Scherbak D. Probiotic administration is associated with increased mortality in ICU patients with central venous catheters. Chest. 2022;162(4):A1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Luyt CE, Bréchot N, Trouillet JL, Chastre J. Antibiotic stewardship in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Harmoinen J, Vaali K, Koski P, Syrjänen K, Laitinen O, Lindevall K, et al. Enzymic degradation of a beta-lactam antibiotic, ampicillin, in the gut: a novel treatment modality. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51(2):361–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Kaleko M, Bristol JA, Hubert S, Parsley T, Widmer G, Tzipori S, et al. Development of SYN-004, an oral beta-lactamase treatment to protect the gut microbiome from antibiotic-mediated damage and prevent Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe. 2016;41:58–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. DAV132 Digestive Cancers [Internet]. Da Volterra. [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://davolterra.com/dav132-digestive-cancers/

  170. Blunting the Effects of Antibiotics on the Intestinal Microbiome [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.jwatch.org/na46230/2018/03/06/blunting-effects-antibiotics-intestinal-microbiome

  171. Ooijevaar RE, Terveer EM, Verspaget HW, Kuijper EJ, Keller JJ. Clinical application and potential of fecal microbiota transplantation. Annu Rev Med. 2019;27(70):335–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Limketkai BN, Hendler S, Ting PS, Parian AM. fecal microbiota transplantation for the critically Ill patient. Nutr Clin Pract Off Publ Am Soc Parenter Enter Nutr. 2019;34(1):73–9.

    Google Scholar 

  173. DeFilipp Z, Bloom PP, Torres Soto M, Mansour MK, Sater MRA, Huntley MH, et al. Drug-resistant E. coli bacteremia transmitted by fecal microbiota transplant. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2043–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile | NEJM [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 2]. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1205037

  175. Keskey R, Cone JT, DeFazio JR, Alverdy JC. The use of fecal microbiota transplant in sepsis. Transl Res J Lab Clin Med. 2020;226:12–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Millan B, Park H, Hotte N, Mathieu O, Burguiere P, Tompkins TA, et al. Fecal microbial transplants reduce antibiotic-resistant genes in patients with recurrent clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2016;62(12):1479–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Kim SM, DeFazio JR, Hyoju SK, Sangani K, Keskey R, Krezalek MA, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant rescues mice from human pathogen mediated sepsis by restoring systemic immunity. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In memory of Nicola Brienza, esteemed professor, researcher, doctor, mentor, friend and father, who had understood the central role of the gut in ICU.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Passed away on September 29th 2022. Rest in peace Professor

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine - ICU Section, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy

    Alberto Corriero, Filomena Puntillo & Nicola Brienza

  2. Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy

    Raffaella Maria Gadaleta & Antonio Moschetta

  3. Dental Medicine Section, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124, Bari, Italy

    Francesco Inchingolo

Authors
  1. Alberto Corriero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raffaella Maria Gadaleta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Filomena Puntillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesco Inchingolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antonio Moschetta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nicola Brienza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.C. and N.B. wrote the first draft of the manuscript which was critically revised by R.M.G, A.M., F.I. and F.P.; A.C. and R.M.G. prepared the figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alberto Corriero or Filomena Puntillo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corriero, A., Gadaleta, R.M., Puntillo, F. et al. The central role of the gut in intensive care. Crit Care 26, 379 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04259-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04259-8

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535