Skip to main content

The ICU Bridge Program: volunteers bridging medicine and people together

Abstract

Background

The intensive care unit (ICU) is an emotionally taxing environment. Patients and family members are at an increased risk of long-term physical and psychological consequences of critical illness, known collectively as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). These environmental strains can lead to a high incidence of staff turnover and burnout.

Aim

The ICU Bridge Program (ICUBP) is a student-led organization that attempts to mitigate these stressors on patients, family, and staff, by assigning university volunteers to ICUs across Montreal.

Setting

ICU.

Participants

ICU volunteers, staff, patients, and families.

Program description

The ICUBP volunteers support staff by orienting patients and families, while using effective communication strategies to provide comfort and promote a calm environment. The presence of volunteer visitors is helpful to patients who do not have the support of family members and/or friends. The program provides students with profound learning experiences by allowing them to shadow multidisciplinary teams, gaining a privileged and varied exposure to an acute medical environment, while developing their communications skills.

Program evaluation

The program reassesses its methods and impact via internal student-designed surveys distributed on a yearly basis to staff and volunteers.

Discussion

Research is warranted to assess the impact of the program on ICU patients, visitors, staff, and volunteers.

Introduction

The intensive care unit (ICU) is an emotionally taxing environment. People from all walks of life are thrown into a distressing and tumultuous situation with very little control or guidance. For both patients and family members, the events that occur in the ICU can have many negative long-term psychologic and physical effects [1].

Patients in the ICU are often sedated and receive mechanical ventilation, making it difficult for them to recall the events leading up to their hospital admission, as well as their treatment and recovery process. Up to 80% of patients will experience hallucinations and delusional memories of their ICU stay [2]. As a result, many develop post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), with symptoms of post-traumatic stress such as excessive anxiety, flashbacks, emotional lability, frequent triggers, and depression [3]. For patients, mental and physical stress can worsen their medical condition, extend the length of their treatment, and ultimately endanger their lives [1]. One effective solution to this problem is visitation. Visitation allows patients to stay in touch with their family members and friends, to be aware of events happening outside of the hospital, and it has been shown to have a positive effect on the patient's condition [4].

As a result of the intimidating and complex nature of the ICU, its restricted access, and the limited ability to interact with patients, family members experience difficult emotions alongside their ill loved one. In fact, as many as 33% of family members can develop long-term psychologic consequences, known collectively as PICS-Family [3]. There is evidence that healthy visitors show an increased likelihood of developing depression and of having negative perceptions of the ICU following the discharge of a family member [5]. Given the importance of patient and family-centered care, it is of vital importance to recognize and address this issue during the ICU experience to ensure that family members receive deserved attention when illness strikes their loved ones.

Many issues arise when attempting to address these problems. Hospital staff recognize the importance of compassionate care and do their best to support the mental health of their patients and family members. However, patient care is taxing, and the added demand to attend to the social needs of patients and their families may contribute to staff burnout [6]. It is for these reasons that facilitating the important role of visitation, while at the same time minimizing any added burden on health care workers is an incredibly important task.

The introduction of volunteers into healthcare contexts can address these issues and studies (Table 1) have demonstrated that volunteer interventions are an efficient method to:

  1. 1.

    Increase patient and team morale by dedicating time to one-on-one patient interactions, increasing socialization, reducing anxiety, and alleviating staff workload.

  2. 2.

    Improve quality of care and reduce adverse health outcomes, such as length of stay, falls, and improve food intake and mobilization.

Table 1 Literature review of volunteers in healthcare

It is of critical importance to ensure that volunteers are adequately trained. Not only does this ensure patient safety and satisfaction, but it allows the volunteers to properly integrate into the healthcare team and feel confident in their position. Moreover, volunteers need to be provided with the tools necessary to safely navigate emotionally charged environments. Studies have shown that nursing turnover is linked to new ICU nurses experiencing high levels of anxiety associated with lack of hospital knowledge and experience and the gap between their educational and practical work [7, 8]. Similarly, other members of the ICU staff, such as physical therapists and residents, have felt underprepared going into the ICU environment [9]. To mitigate this, studies have shown that high-ranking competencies such as socialization, communication with colleagues and supervisors, as well as active listening to patients led to early success in the medical workforce [7, 10]. Another potential solution is to give prospective staff more exposure and experience inside the hospital through simulations and shadowing programs, as this is not always included in the standard curricula due to time limitations [9, 11, 12].

The ICU Bridge Program (ICUBP) (www.icubridgeprogram.org) was operationalized in 2016 by McGill students MS and AAD based on an idea and concept from, and under the faculty guidance of DH. This program assigns university students to hospital ICUs in the Montreal area to help families navigate the hospital environment and support their journey through their family member’s critical illness. The volunteers assist ICU staff by regulating the flow of visitors in the ward and being emotionally supportive to their needs. They may also communicate simple information to visitors, such as updates on care, schedules, and patient movement to and from the ICU.

This program differs from previously described critical care volunteer programs [13] and other volunteering programs (Table 1) in that it is organized primarily by university students, its volunteer base is open to all undergraduate students regardless of faculty, and it offers combined volunteering and shadowing opportunities. As such, this program aims to further alleviate staff workload by supporting the emotional wellbeing of patients and family members, while providing a rich educational experience for its volunteers. Its student-led executive team removes nearly all responsibilities that a volunteering program of such caliber would impose on hospital medical and administrative/volunteer staff.

Setting and participants

The ICUBP started at the Montreal General Hospital in 2016 (Fig. 1) and is currently operational in 4 different intensive care units (3 adult and 1 pediatric) in the Montreal area. The ICUBP student administration coordinates over 160 volunteers. The program is entirely run by an executive team of 15 + university students (Fig. 2). The ICUBP is self-funded through student initiatives coordinated by a dedicated branch of the executive team. On site offerings to family members such as refreshments and incidental small gifts are funded through a separate fund, The Lauren Alexander Family Support fund.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The Intensive Care Unit Bridge Program’s 1st volunteers with co-founder Dr. David Hornstein (March, 2016)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Structure of the Intensive Care Unit Bridge Program’s executive team. ICUBP, Intensive Care Unit Bridge Program; VHM, Volunteer and Hospital Management; MFS, Marketing, Fundraising, and Socials; Cont(ED)I, continuing education and equity, diversity, and inclusion; HOTH, humans of the hospital. Box colours: Yellow = Hospital staff representatives and allies of the ICUBP, Green = Minimal viable executive team structure, White = Ideal executive team structure (in addition to Green). Descriptions: ICUBP hospital staff representatives: These are members of the volunteer office and ICU staff (nurses, social workers, doctors, etc.) that help the ICUBP executives integrate the program into their hospital/unit and inform their colleagues about the program. They are the go-to people for ICU staff, volunteers, and executives for matters regarding the ICUBP. Co-head(s): Each team has co-head(s) that coordinate their activities with their fellow co-head(s) while managing their team’s efforts. Co-head(s) simultaneously hold positions within their team (i.e., a co-head may also be a hospital coordinator for the VHM team or a communications coordinator for the MFS team). VHM team: Coordinates everything with regard to the volunteer workflow (recruitment, applications, interviews, orientations, scheduling, and end of semester transitions) and collaborates with hospital volunteer offices and ICU staff. (1) Hospital coordinator: Responsible for volunteer administrative tasks, workflows, and timelines. (2) Volunteer representative: Responsible for the volunteers’ experiences within the ICU via in-person and remote check-ins. During these volunteer check-ins, they will also communicate with the ICUBP hospital staff representatives. (1) The coordinator and representative roles largely overlap, but the coordinator is generally the more experienced executive and understands more of the ICUBP logistics and timelines. MFS team: Responsible for a variety of tasks related to increasing volunteer recruitment, informing volunteers, staff, the public regarding the ICUBP’s activities, and raising funds to ensure the program is self-sufficient. (1) Website designer: Responsible for updating the program’s website (www.icubridgeprogram.org), which is the volunteers’ and community’s first impression of the program and crucial for the volunteer application process. (2) Communications coordinator: Responsible for the program’s email correspondence and social media. (3) Outreach coordinator: Responsible for reaching out to universities and the community to help recruit volunteers and raise funds to support the program (bake sales, attending university activity nights, class announcements, etc.). (4) Cont(ED)i coordinator: Responsible for assessing and promoting the diversity of the ICUBP’s volunteers and executive team through our equity survey (Fig. 3), as well as coordinating workshops with experts and invited guests for our volunteers regarding the intensive care unit or matters related to equity. (5) HOTH coordinator: Responsible for creating our photoblog (https://www.icubridgeprogram.org/humans-of-the-hospital, inspired by https://www.humansofnewyork.com/) by interviewing and photographing our ICUBP stakeholders in order to bring to light insightful stories and experiences from our ICU staff, patients, visitors, volunteers, and executives. (6) Videography coordinator: Responsible for filming, editing, and creating promotional and informational videos regarding the program. (7) Finance and analytics coordinator: Responsible for record keeping of the program’s financials and the creation and analysis of our program surveys. Happiness team: Happiness coordinators are co-heads who are responsible for: on-boarding new executives through orientations, increasing collaboration and communication between the different teams and their members, and checking-in on the interpersonal and emotional well-being of the ICUBP executive. They help organize executive and volunteer social gatherings and team/community bonding exercises along with the outreach coordinators. (1) Project and development coordinator: Responsible for projects like the ICU journals and for the long-term sustainability and efficiency of the ICUBP by updating the program’s standard operating procedure manual

Volunteers (Fig. 3) work in dyads to ensure that constant support is provided to patients, their families, the staff, and each other. They participate in a weekly 4-h shift for a minimum commitment of 13 weeks which aligns with university semesters (Winter, Summer, and Fall). This consistency creates a schedule that ICU staff and volunteer offices can easily follow and helps develop professional relationships between volunteers and staff, which further facilitates the positive learning environment the ICUBP fosters.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Volunteer and executive workflow and protocol. Description: Steps: (1) The ICUBP applicant reviews the ICUBP’s website (https://www.icubridgeprogram.org/) to ensure they fulfill the program’s requirements and have their documentation and required information in order. The applicant fills out 2 separate forms (~ 20 min) that automatically generate and pre-populate the required PDF documents for the ICUBP and each of its hospital, minimizing the program’s focus on form completion. The 3rd form is optional and is a 12-min anonymous equity and diversity survey to assess the composition of students applying to the program. (2) If the application is complete and all the appropriate information is given, the application is approved by the ICUBP team and the program’s university student group partners interview the applicant according to a standardized form developed by the ICUBP. Once the interview is completed and the form submitted, the ICUBP executive team makes the final decision on all applicants. For additional details on the automations and integrations involved in Steps 1 and 2, please refer to: https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73818. Steps 3 and 4 are the ICUBP’s transitional period to accommodate the changing availabilities and schedules of students that occur between semesters. (3) If the applicant is accepted into the program, they and the current cohort of volunteers will be invited to fill out our semester survey and provide their availabilities for the upcoming semester on a rolling admissions basis due to their being limited spots/shifts available within the program and hospitals. Volunteer priority goes as follows: current volunteers > returning volunteers > new volunteers. The application deadline for new volunteers is the 20th of the 3rd month of every semester in order to provide some time for applicants to be reviewed, interviewed, and give their availabilities. Though this varies according to each unit/hospital’s needs, the ICUBP offers 28 possible 4-h weekly shifts, which further increases the accessibility of the program as it can accommodate a variety of schedules. Students are paired up primarily according to their availabilities, but if the availabilities allow for it, the ICUBP executive team does their best to pair new volunteers with more experienced ones and considers other factors to optimize volunteer experience and program impact. (4) New volunteers or students that wish to switch to a new site must attend orientations that are hosted by the ICUBP Hospital Coordinator and Volunteer Representative, with the help of the ICUBP’s hospital staff representatives, which include the hospital’s volunteer manager who completes the necessary in-person volunteer registration tasks (police checks, hospital IDs, etc.) and ICU staff who help with touring the ICU. Volunteers can begin volunteering and shadowing. (5) (Optional) If the volunteer wishes, they can apply to the ICUBP executive team when the application form opens at the end of the Winter semester, though there may be exceptional recruitment periods throughout the year depending on the executive team’s needs. Generally, the ICUBP recruits and gives priority to applicants that have volunteered previously with the ICUBP, particularly for VHM positions, where familiarity with volunteering and the ICU environment is crucial. However, executive positions are open to the general university population. Executive applicants must fill out 1 form and if approved, go on to be interviewed by the executive team, who are guided by an interview form that standardizes the executive application system according to the applicant’s position of interest

Indeed, the ICUBP not only aims to help patients, families, and staff, but also offers students the chance to learn more about the healthcare system and improve their communication skills. Through their weekly shifts and multiple interactions with patients, visitors, and staff, volunteers can better understand the inner workings of the hospital environment, and more specifically the ICU and its multidisciplinary nature. The student volunteers can improve their ability to speak with empathy, manage confidential information, and navigate difficult emotional situations. These are assets that will serve them in all their future endeavors, whether medical or otherwise.

A central and innovative facet of this program is the weekly combined volunteering and shadowing components that offers students the opportunity to follow and learn from health professionals during a shift. Shadowing is a much sought-after activity for interested students; however, its availability is exceptionally limited. As such, this structured volunteering-based program offers the opportunity for students to gain hospital experience by shadowing medical professionals of the ICU while at the same time fulfilling an important and meaningful volunteering role.

Program description

Volunteers fulfill multiple roles within the ICU. They help visitors by welcoming them into the ward and orienting them toward the patient or staff they wish to see, thus increasing communication within the ICU. They help lend a non-medical and friendly ear to those in need and offer different amenities (water, snacks, plushies, coloring books, etc.) that are supplied by The Lauren Alexander Family Support fund to visitors and their children who often stay alongside their sick loved ones for extended periods of time. Their role in relaying information between staff and family members is crucial in improving the ICU’s environment, as it allows staff to concentrate on the quality of care they provide.

In some circumstances, family members can find it difficult to be present for their loved ones due to work constraints and other familial responsibilities. There are also patients who do not have visitors, because they lack contacts within the city/country, are elderly and may not have as many visitors as younger patients, or for other reasons. With visitation being considered an essential aspect of reducing delirium during patient care, volunteers can play a crucial role in such situations as they can reduce the emotional pressure felt by families and help patients and staff by keeping them company [14]. Depending on the patient’s condition, volunteers are available to engage in discussions or even play games, encouraging them to be more physically or mentally active.

Program evaluation

The ICUBP was created and implemented by undergraduate university students, with the overarching objectives to provide volunteering and shadowing experience to students while providing important service to both patients, family members, and hospital staff. It was not designed as a research project and to date has not been implemented nor analyzed in an empirical fashion. However, observations since inception have led to an understanding that this area is rife for investigation. As a program grounded on patient and family centered care values, on family engagement, and on emotional wellbeing of family and staff, structured formal analyses of overall family/visitor staff satisfaction with the program should be conducted with validated measures. The effects the program has on perceived unit workload and stress levels among personnel, and finally its impact on the volunteers themselves are also areas of great interest for future research. Our team has recognized the importance of formal collaboration with expertise in the field to pursue these questions further, and such collaboration is sought through DH and the division of General Internal Medicine at McGill.

Evaluations of the program to date have been in the form of qualitative and quantitative anonymous student-designed surveys distributed internally to all volunteers and staff every 4 to 12 months. These surveys attempt to quantify program satisfaction and impact, and the information is used to assess the current systems in place and make improvements where needed. Data from surveys completed by volunteers and staff over a 6-year period have been used to reorganize shifts to facilitate patient support, improve orientations to better prepare volunteers, and adapt to different high stress situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, volunteers and executives can provide anonymous feedback anytime throughout the year through an online form and executives are encouraged to complete a yearly review of the program’s efforts and/or an exit report when they leave the team.

More recently, an equity and continuing education coordinator position has been added to the executive team. This member aims to highlight the importance of diversity in the program through the implementation of an equity survey. This survey evaluates volunteer demographics and the representation of groups that are underrepresented within the medical field, such as black, indigenous, low socioeconomic, and rural peoples. The form then requests feedback regarding the program’s accessibility for these groups.

A new project for the ICUBP, involvement with the hospital’s Intensive Care Journal program, has been implemented by DH to continue improving the program’s impact. The objective of the journals is to help patients piece together their ICU experiences and “fill in the gaps of lost time.” In this project, families, staff, and volunteers can input entries in a non-medical context, such as:

  • wishes and reflections

  • kind messages,

  • pictures taken during family visits,

  • progress,

  • updates on life outside of the hospital.

These elements have been shown to aid in patient and family member recovery [15]. The ICUBP’s volunteers help manage and encourage journal entries by explaining how the journal application works, assisting staff and family members with making entries, and by contributing content to the journals themselves. Volunteers offer an important perspective to the patient’s stay, particularly in instances where patients do not receive visitors. Once patients are discharged from the ICU, they have the option to have their journals gifted to them to help in their post-treatment recovery. These journals have been shown to reduce the incidence of mental illness following treatment in the ICU as they help patients understand and better integrate their experiences with their illness [15].

Discussion

Supporting patients and family members through communication and compassionate care is essential to the recovery process and the ICUBP targets this [8]. Volunteers are managed by fellow student volunteers and incorporated where they are needed most—at the ICU front desks, waiting rooms, and at the bedside. The ICUBP also addresses situations in which patients may not have visitors and alleviates some of the pressure staff feel to compensate for these patients. Volunteers therefore act as the bridge between families, staff, and patients, supporting both ends by representing the hospital staff (within the realms of their training) while supporting the non-medical needs of the patients and families.

Although there are many positive aspects to the program, it can be stressful for volunteers. They often encounter difficult situations of helping meet the needs of family members while also supporting healthcare workers. Communicating with distraught family members can also be difficult for volunteers. To address this concern, the ICUBP trains its volunteers to properly address issues that may arise through volunteering. The executive team is constantly working with the ICU staff to ensure volunteers have the right tools to communicate effectively with patients, families, and staff. Each hospital site is assigned two dedicated senior team members as Volunteer Representative and Hospital Coordinator (Fig. 2), who support the volunteers on the terrain by providing hospital and unit-specific guidance and expertise.

There have been limitations to date in the ability to formally quantify the program’s impact on patients, family members, and staff. Although the student-run surveys and testimonials have provided valuable information about the program, these surveys suffer from the standard issues of self-selection and of being unable to truly quantify improved mental health of patients, families, and staff [16]. Further information on the program’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT analysis) can be found in Table 2.

Table 2 SWOT analysis

The ICUBP has been bridging the gap between staff and families for the last 6 years. Emotional support is an important aspect for the health of patients, their families, and staff. Through their participation in this program, students contribute to the humanity of the ICU environment, gain key clinical experience, and become individuals with stronger empathy and communication skills. Through surveys and data collection, the student-run executive team strives to continuously improve its program so that it meets the needs of the dynamic hospital environment. With more research on volunteer, staff, patient, and family satisfaction, this program has future potential to further innovate hospital ICU environments.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ICUBP:

ICU Bridge Program

PICS:

Post-intensive care syndrome

HOTH:

Humans of the hospital

MFS:

Marketing, fundraising, and socials

VHM:

Volunteer and hospital management

SWOT analysis:

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

Cont(ED)i:

Continuing education and equity, diversity, and inclusion

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

References

  1. Khaleghparast S, Joolaee S, Ghanbari B, Maleki M, Peyrovi H, Bahrani N. A review of visiting policies in intensive care units. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8(6):267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Girard TD, Pandharipande PP, Ely E. Delirium in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2008;12(3):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome–family. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):618–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haghbin SA, Tayebi Z, Abbasian A, Haghbin H. Visiting hour policies in intensive care units, southern Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011;13(9):684.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanimoto S, Takayanagi K, Yokota H, Yamamoto Y. The psychological and physiological effects of an intensive-care unit environment on healthy individuals. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1999;7(2):77–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ning J, Cope V. Open visiting in adult intensive care units—a structured literature review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020;1(56):102763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Kane CE. Newly qualified nurses experiences in the intensive care unit. Nurs Crit Care. 2012;17(1):44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeGrande H, Liu F, Greene P, Stankus JA. The experiences of new graduate nurses hired and retained in adult intensive care units. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018;1(49):72–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohtake PJ, Lazarus M, Schillo R, Rosen M. Simulation experience enhances physical therapist student confidence in managing a patient in the critical care environment. Phys Ther. 2013;93(2):216–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fürstenberg S, Schick K, Deppermann J, Prediger S, Berberat PO, Kadmon M, Harendza S. Competencies for first year residents–physicians’ views from medical schools with different undergraduate curricula. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cato DL, Murray M. Use of simulation training in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2010;33(1):44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Messmer PR, Jones SG, Taylor BA. Enhancing knowledge and self-confidence of novice nurses: the" Shadow-A-Nurse" ICU program. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2004;25(3):131–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parsonnet L, Weinstein L. A volunteer program for helping families in a critical care unit. Health Soc Work. 1987;12(1):21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosa RG, Tonietto TF, da Silva DB, Gutierres FA, Ascoli AM, Madeira LC, Rutzen W, Falavigna M, Robinson CC, Salluh JI, Cavalcanti AB. Effectiveness and safety of an extended ICU visitation model for delirium prevention: a before and after study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(10):1660–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Veloso Costa A, Padfield O, Elliott S, Hayden P. Improving patient diary use in intensive care: a quality improvement report. J Intensive Care Soc. 2021;22(1):27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Starr S. Survey research: we can do better. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2012;100(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson R, Jones G, Beardsall K. ‘Comfort Club’: student-run volunteering on the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Teach. 2022;19(1):59–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bloomer MJ, Walshe C. ‘It’s not what they were expecting’: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the role and experience of the hospital palliative care volunteer. Palliat Med. 2020;34(5):589–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shipley RH. Effects of a companion program on college student volunteers and mental patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1976;44(4):688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bateman C, Anderson K, Bird M, Hungerford C. Volunteers improving person-centred dementia and delirium care in a rural Australian hospital. Rural Remote Health. 2016;16(2):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ervin K, Moore S. Rural nurses’ perceptions of a volunteer program in an acute setting: volunteers delivering person-centred care for patients with dementia and delirium. Open J Nurs. 2014;6:2014.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shee AW, Phillips B, Hill K, Dodd K. Feasibility and acceptability of a volunteer-mediated diversional therapy program for older patients with cognitive impairment. Geriatr Nurs. 2014;35(4):300–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandhaus S, Zalon ML, Valenti D, Dzielak E, Smego RA Jr, Arzamasova U. A volunteer-based hospital elder life program to reduce delirium. Health News. 2010;29(2):150–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steadman PE, Crudden J, Naranian T, Oliveria JP, Boutis K. The professional benefits for volunteer research assistants in a pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(3):287–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saunders R, Seaman K, Graham R, Christiansen A. The effect of volunteers’ care and support on the health outcomes of older adults in acute care: a systematic scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(23–24):4236–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Green SM, Martin HJ, Roberts HC, Sayer AA. A systematic review of the use of volunteers to improve mealtime care of adult patients or residents in institutional settings. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(13–14):1810–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walton K, Williams P, Bracks J, Zhang Q, Pond L, Smoothy R, Tapsell L, Batterham M, Vari L. A volunteer feeding assistance program can improve dietary intakes of elderly patients—a pilot study. Appetite. 2008;51(2):244–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Donoghue J, Graham J, Mitten-Lewis S, Murphy M, Gibbs J. A volunteer companion-observer intervention reduces falls on an acute aged care ward. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2005;18:24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baczynska AM, Lim SE, Sayer AA, Roberts HC. The use of volunteers to help older medical patients mobilise in hospital: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(21–22):3102–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge and express our gratitude to all past and present members of the ICU Bridge Program’s student executive team and volunteers, as well as ICU staff in our 4 hospital locations for their hard work and dedication.

Funding

The Intensive Care Unit Bridge Program is supported by the Montreal General Hospital Foundation’s Intensive Care Unit Bridge Program and The Lauren Alexander Family Support funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DH, MS, and AAD are co-founders of the ICU Bridge Program initiative and SP and AG are part of the organizing team. SP, AG, and AAD drafted the initial publication and figures and DH and MH provided crucial feedback, revisions, and edits. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adamo Anthony Donovan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrecca, S., Goin, A., Hornstein, D. et al. The ICU Bridge Program: volunteers bridging medicine and people together. Crit Care 26, 346 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04209-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04209-4

Keywords