Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between timing of speech and language therapy initiation and outcomes among post-extubation dysphagia patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Critical Care volume 26, Article number: 98 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is recognized as a common complication in the intensive care unit (ICU). Speech and language therapy (SLT) can potentially help improve PED; however, the impact of the timing of SLT initiation on persistent PED has not been well investigated. This study aimed to examine the timing of SLT initiation and its effect on patient outcomes after extubation in the ICU.

Methods

We conducted this multicenter, retrospective, cohort study, collecting data from eight ICUs in Japan. Patients aged ≥ 20 years with orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 h, and those who received SLT due to PED, defined as patients with modified water swallowing test scores of 3 or lower, were included. The primary outcome was dysphagia at hospital discharge, defined as functional oral intake scale score < 5 or death after extubation. Secondary outcomes included dysphagia or death at the seventh, 14th, or 28th day after extubation, aspiration pneumonia, and in-hospital mortality. Associations between the timing of SLT initiation and outcomes were determined using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

A total of 272 patients were included. Of them, 82 (30.1%) patients exhibited dysphagia or death at hospital discharge, and their time spans from extubation to SLT initiation were 1.0 days. The primary outcome revealed that every day of delay in SLT initiation post-extubation was associated with dysphagia or death at hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02–1.18). Similarly, secondary outcomes showed associations between this per day delay in SLT initiation and dysphagia or death at the seventh day (AOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.55), 14th day (AOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13–1.58), or 28th day (AOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07–1.36) after extubation and occurrence of aspiration pneumonia (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02–1.17), while per day delay in post-extubation SLT initiation did not affect in-hospital mortality (AOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97–1.12).

Conclusions

Delayed initiation of SLT in PED patients was associated with persistent dysphagia or death. Early initiation of SLT may prevent this complication post-extubation. A randomized controlled study is needed to validate these results.

Background

Approximately 13–20 million critically ill patients are intubated in the intensive care unit (ICU) every year [1]. Post-extubation dysphagia (PED), the inability to swallow food or liquid following extubation, is a major complication among patients in the ICU [2, 3]. An early study estimated its incidence as up to 62% of critically ill patients with recent prolonged intubation [3]. Importantly, a study showed that 87% of patients with PED failed to recover from dysphagia at ICU discharge, and 64% of those patients had persistent swallowing disorders at hospital discharge [4]. Even at six months, 23% of PED patients still experienced dysphagia [5]. Additionally, PED can negatively impact patient outcomes, leading to longer hospital length of stay, aspiration pneumonia, re-intubation, need to place feeding tubes, and higher mortality rate [4, 6,7,8]. These findings emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary efforts in the early recognition and management of PED; however, to date, limited evidence exists to treat this pathology in the ICU.

A recent meta-analysis showed that swallowing treatments had a significant effect on reducing the risk of developing pneumonia in the critical care setting [9]. However, most data were derived from stroke patients treated with electrical stimulation. Speech and language pathologists (SLPs), experts in the treatment of communication disorders or swallowing impairments, primarily evaluate and manage patients with dysphagia in the ICU [10, 11]. Although SLPs are supposed to play a critical role in treating this complication, the optimal timing of interventions for PED patients by SLPs is still unclear. Early oral trials may cause a transient decrease in oxygen saturation, while delay in interventions may result in less effectiveness and worse functional outcomes [9]. Some patients even recover without any specific treatment. These clinical concerns are causing a conflict between recovery of swallowing function and the risk of aspiration in the absence of any established evidence for this issue. More importantly, potential barriers to the care of PED patients might stem from the fact that this complication is still under-recognized and less of a focus among ICU staff [2, 12].

Therefore, we hypothesized that the timing of swallowing therapy by SLPs would affect the outcomes of PED patients. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate distributions of the timing of swallowing therapy initiation by SLPs and evaluate its impact on the swallowing function of PED patients.

Methods

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital (Approval number: 210506), and it conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient consent was waived for all participants enrolled in this study because of the retrospective study design. This study was conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Study design and setting

This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was performed using data from the electronic medical records of patients admitted to the ICUs of five tertiary and three community hospitals in Japan from January 2017 to December 2020. The five tertiary hospitals included Kameda Medical Center in Chiba, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital in Shizuoka, Nagoya Medical Center in Aichi, Hokkaido Medical Center in Hokkaido, and Nara Prefecture General Medical Center in Nara. The three community hospitals included Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital in Okayama, Misato Kenwa Hospital in Saitama, and Okayama Rosai Hospital in Okayama. The detailed characteristics of the institutions are shown in Additional file 1.

Study population

All patients aged ≥ 20 years were eligible if they required orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 h and were treated for dysphagia by SLPs because of a lower modified water swallowing test (MWST) score following extubation (described below). To focus on the patients with PED, those admitted to the ICU due to cerebrovascular disease, those who required tracheostomy, and those with preexisting dysphagia were excluded. Patients with treatment restrictions, ICU readmissions, and incomplete primary outcome data were also excluded. Patients’ dysphagia was determined to be preexisting if they had a history of aspiration pneumonia, frequent episodes of cough upon liquid consumption or food sticking in the throat, or required dietary modification before hospital admission. Nurses routinely screened post-extubation swallowing function using a bedside swallowing screening. Briefly, the MWST was used to screen for dysphagia and score swallowing on a scale of 1–5 by having the patient swallow 3 mL of water. We adopted the MWST because it has been widely used in Japan with its sensitivity and specificity of 0.70 and 0.88, respectively, and demonstrated significant association with post-extubation pneumonia in cardiovascular surgery patient [13,14,15]. The MWST scores were defined as follows: 1. no drinking with choking and/or respiratory distress; 2. drinking and respiratory distress; 3. drinking and choking and/or hoarseness without respiratory distress; 4. drinking without choking and respiratory distress; and 5. drinking without choking and respiratory distress, plus able to perform two repetitive dry swallows within 30 s [15, 16]. Patients with MWST scores of 3 or lower, which were associated with a greater risk of aspiration pneumonia, were subjected to swallowing therapy by SLPs [15, 16]. The timing of speech and language therapy (SLT) initiation was determined based upon the intensivist’s or attending physician’s discretion.

SLT and exposures

In this study, SLT was defined as at least one unit (equal to 20 min) of rehabilitation conducted by SLPs during hospitalization [17]. The sessions included swallowing and/or compensatory rehabilitation strategies, both of which are common approaches to treating dysphagia [18]. Swallowing rehabilitation involved traditional swallowing exercises to restore the strength and coordination of the tongue, pharyngeal, and laryngeal muscles, as well as respiratory muscle strength training. Swallowing compensatory strategies refer to bolus modification (i.e., texture, volume, and consistency), environmental arrangement, or maintaining proper posture of the head, neck, and body before swallowing [9]. During hospitalization, SLPs were primarily responsible for modifying the diet, changing maneuvers, or making decisions to restrict oral intake when necessary. For those patients whose swallowing function was severely impaired, direct therapy involving swallowing texture-modified foods or liquids was suspended to avoid aspiration. In all the institutions, actual steps or orders were determined solely by clinical evaluations in the ICU and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) or videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was used accordingly after ICU discharge. As an adjunctive tool for swallowing evaluation, repetitive saliva swallowing test was also used to help determine the appropriate intervention or food modification [19]. The main exposure was the days from extubation to SLT initiation. These data were obtained from electronic medical records.

Data collection

We collected the following data from patients’ medical records: demographics (age, gender, and body mass index (BMI); comorbidities based on Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, including preexisting dementia and cerebrovascular disease; ICU admission source (outpatient, emergency department, general ward, transfer from another hospital); ICU admission category (cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, trauma, or other); ICU admission type (medical or surgery); presence of sepsis or septic shock based on Sepsis-3 criteria; Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at ICU admission; the presence of delirium and SOFA score on the day of extubation; MWST score following extubation; duration of mechanical ventilation; use of vasopressor, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or renal replacement therapy (RRT); data on enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) and SLT (timing, frequency, swallowing and/or compensatory rehabilitation); duration of oral intake after extubation; and outcomes including functional oral intake scale (FOIS) score (see below) at hospital discharge and on the seventh, 14th, and 28th day after extubation, aspiration pneumonia after extubation, in-hospital mortality, and length of ICU and hospital stay.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was dysphagia or death at hospital discharge. This composite outcome was chosen based upon the previous studies to minimize selection bias by encompassing all patients who underwent SLT [20, 21]. Dysphagia was defined as FOIS score < 5, which represents a severely impaired oral intake [22, 23]. The FOIS, a validated and reliable scale for measuring dysphagia, was examined by the treating SLPs. Scores range from 1 (nothing by mouth) to 7 (total oral diet with no restrictions), with higher scores indicating better swallowing function [22]. Secondary outcomes included dysphagia or death at the seventh, 14th, and 28th day after extubation, aspiration pneumonia following extubation, and in-hospital mortality.

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQRs), while categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. To assess the impact of timing of SLT initiation on patient outcomes, multivariable logistic regression was performed, adjusting for covariates including institutions, age, ICU admission type, comorbidities including preexisting dementia and cerebrovascular disease, duration of mechanical ventilation, delirium on the day of extubation, SOFA score on the day of extubation, EN, and PN. These variables were essentially selected based on the results of previous studies and our clinical interests [24]. The results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

We then performed five sensitivity analyses. (1) We used alternative definitions of dysphagia as FOIS score < 6 (total oral diet with multiple consistencies, without special preparation but with specific food limitations) according to the previous study [25]. (2) We excluded patients who received gastrointestinal surgery to avoid possible confounding by oral intake restrictions. (3) We excluded those who died after extubation and received SLT because the association between dysphagia and fatality is assumed to be bidirectional: dysphagia can result from fatality. (4) To address other potential confounders of dysphagia, we selected different covariates to assess the robustness of our findings; we conducted additional multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess the association of SLT initiation timing and patient outcomes. In Model 2, gender, age, BMI, SOFA score at ICU admission, sepsis, and MWST score were added. Model 3 incorporated the duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, ECMO, IABP, RRT, EN, and PN. (5) We conducted an analysis dividing the patients into three groups based on the time interval from extubation to SLT initiation to reassess the outcomes.

A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata version 17 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

Results

During the four-year period, 963 adult patients (age ≥ 20 years) with MWST scores ≤ 3 following extubation from mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h were identified. After excluding cases (n = 691), 272 patients were included in our study cohort (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of our study. MV: mechanical ventilation, MWST: modified water swallowing test, ICU: intensive care unit

Full size image

The demographics and clinical characteristics of the participants are listed in Table 1. The median age of the participants was 74 years old (IQR 65–81); 188 (69.1%) were men and 84 (30.9%) were women. The prevalence of preexisting dementia and cerebrovascular disease was 14.3% (39/272) and 12.1% (33/272), respectively. The numbers of ICU admissions related to cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal disease were 34 (12.6%), 88 (32.7%), and 56 (21.9%), respectively. Of the 272 patients included in the study, more than half had sepsis or septic shock; 114 (42.1%) underwent surgery. The patients were severely ill as shown by a median SOFA score of 8 (IQR 6–10) and a median APACHE II score of 23 (IQR 17–29) at ICU admission. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 5.3 days (IQR 3.3–7.5). The swallowing assessment and characteristics of SLP intervention are shown in Table 2. The median MWST score on the first day of swallow screening was 3 (IQR 2–3). The median intervals from extubation to SLT initiation and extubation to oral intake were one day (IQR 0.3–2.2) and four days (IQR 2–9), respectively. Figure 2 describes the proportion of patients presenting with dysphagia or death at discharge based on the number of days from extubation to SLT initiation. Although there was a slight increase over time in the number of patients who died after initiating SLT, Fig. 3 demonstrates a gradual improvement of swallowing function: median FOIS scores on the seventh, 14th, and 28th days after extubation and at hospital discharge were 4 (IQR 1–5), 4 (IQR 2–6), 5 (IQR 3–6), and 6 (IQR 5–7), respectively. The prevalence of dysphagia or death at hospital discharge was 30.1% (82/272) (Table 3). Table 3 demonstrates the association of SLT initiation timing and outcomes. After adjusting for covariates (i.e., institutions, age, ICU admission type, comorbidities including preexisting dementia and cerebrovascular disease, duration of mechanical ventilation, delirium on the day of extubation, SOFA score on the day of extubation, EN, and PN), the primary outcome revealed that every day of delay in SLT initiation after extubation was associated with dysphagia or death at hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02–1.18). Similar results were obtained at different time points: on the seventh day (AOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.55), 14th day (AOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13–1.58), and 28th day (AOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07–1.36) after extubation. In addition, the timing of SLT initiation (per day delay) was associated with the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02–1.17), but it was not associated with in-hospital mortality (AOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97–1.12).

Table 1 Patient characteristics of the whole cohort
Full size table
Table 2 Swallow screening test and characteristics of SLT
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of the number of patients with dysphagia or death at hospital discharge based on the time interval from extubation to SLT initiation. SLT: speech and language therapy

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of FOIS scores and their trajectories over time. Early discharge from the hospital did not allow us to follow up eight and 58 patients on the 14th and 28th days after extubation, respectively. FOIS: function oral intake scale

Full size image
Table 3 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of association between the timing of SLT initiation and outcomes
Full size table

In the sensitivity analysis, our results were unaffected by alternating the definition of dysphagia (Additional file 2), excluding the patients who had gastrointestinal surgery (Additional file 3), excluding those who died after SLT (Additional file 4), or developing other models using different covariates (Additional file 5). Similarly, those who started SLT within one day after extubation were associated with a decrease in dysphagia or death at hospital discharge and aspiration pneumonia (Additional file 6).

Discussion

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted on data from patients treated in the ICUs of eight hospitals in Japan, we evaluated the timing of SLT initiation after extubation and dysphagia or death. We found that more than half of the patients with PED were provided SLT within 24 h after extubation. A delay in initiation of SLT post-extubation was associated with dysphagia or death at hospital discharge. Our findings suggest that initiation of SLT within 24 h after extubation in patients with swallowing disorders might be preferable in terms of preventing this important complication in the ICU.

While “disability-free survival” can be used as a valid patient-centered endpoint in perioperative outcomes research, it can be equally useful for shared decision making, quality metrics, and benchmarking quality of care. Disability-free survival is a combination of survival (1—mortality) and a patient-reported assessment of disability measured with a validated questionnaire.

We used dysphagia or death at hospital discharge as a primary outcome. Although it can complicate the interpretation, using this composite outcome offers several advantages. First, this outcome allows us to evaluate disability-free survival, which is considered a valid patient-centered outcome as a composite outcome of mortality and morbidity [26]. As a matter of fact, recent studies have evaluated disability-free survival as a composite outcome, integrating all-cause mortality, regardless of the study design [20, 21, 27, 28]. Second, it can achieve sufficient power to detect a treatment effect. A composite outcome has been proposed to enhance statistical efficiency for critical care trials [29]. Third, this composite outcome can reduce selection bias. Excluding patients who died after initiation of SLT prevents us from examining the swallowing function and the effect of SLT, thus resulting in selection bias. The primary outcome in this study was selected based upon the rationale that the composite of dysphagia or death could minimize selection bias by accounting for death as a competing risk. Nonetheless, similar results were obtained even after excluding those patients who died after SLT initiation.

The underlying pathophysiological mechanism of PED is multifactorial, including direct trauma, neuromyopathy as part of ICU-acquired weakness, impaired oropharyngeal and laryngeal sensation, altered level of consciousness, gastroesophageal reflux, and discoordination of breathing and swallowing [10, 24, 30]. Given these proposed mechanisms, early intervention against PED is a potential efficient strategy, similar to how early mobilization appears to prevent the development of ICU-acquired weakness [31]. Although several studies have shown a favorable efficacy of swallowing and oral care or speech therapy delivered by specially trained nurses or SLPs on PED [25, 32], optimal timing for the initiation of SLT has not been explored. Several studies have looked at the timing of dysphagia assessment or SLT among non-PED patients. In a large prospective cohort study, delays in dysphagia screening were associated with a greater risk of pneumonia in acute stroke patients [33]. It was speculated that this phenomenon resulted from inappropriate initiation of oral intake or delayed care for ongoing dysphagia. Moreover, a previous study reported that early oral care and SLT (within 24 h after admission) improved swallowing function and survival after hemorrhagic stroke [34]. Another investigation also showed similar results, where an early intervention group (three days after stroke) had better swallowing performance compared a late post-stroke intervention group [35]. Early initiation of SLT, as shown in our study, may be a beneficial strategy to improve swallowing dysfunction and prevent subsequent adverse events post-extubation in critically ill patients.

Although detailed time metrics were not available, SLT was provided later than 24 h after extubation during the ICU stay in past studies [8, 25]. In these studies, more than half of the patients with dysphagia received their first SLT session within 24 h following extubation. It might be challenging to initiate SLT within this timeframe in terms of clinical feasibility and given the expectation of recovery from dysphagia within 24–48 h post-extubation [36,37,38]. Nonetheless, this strategy of early SLT initiation might have contributed to early resolution of dysphagia; our results showed that swallowing function had not been restored in 30% of PED patients at hospital discharge, which was less than a previous prospective observational study (58/90, 64%), despite a higher patient age and severity in our study subjects [4].

To our knowledge, this study was the first to link the timing of SLT in PED patients in the ICU with their outcomes. According to the results from national surveys, many ICUs have become aware of this important issue; however, standardized therapeutic strategies to treat PED have not yet been established [2, 39, 40]. Furthermore, a recent large international survey revealed that SLPs were not yet even available in approximately one third of ICUs [41], which implies that outcome effects could be different from the findings of this study in the setting of absence of SLPs in the ICU. Although further research is warranted to determine and validate proper timing of SLT and which patients to prioritize, implementing early initiation of SLT could be a part of a global strategy to reduce the incidence of persistent PED.

Limitations

First, the timing of SLT initiation was completely dependent on the physician’s preference. Why SLT was delayed for some patients was uncertain: It might have been attributed to patient factors and/or physicians expecting spontaneous recovery. To minimize the bias, in addition to institutions, SOFA scores and the presence or absence of delirium on the day of extubation, which might lead to a delay in starting SLT, were taken into consideration in the multivariable analysis. Due to retrospective design of the study, we still must acknowledge that uncaptured clinical data such as trajectories of actual respiratory or mental status post-extubation may play a causative role in SLT initiation timing. Second, this study did not collect data on the size of the endotracheal tube. A recent prospective study found that larger endotracheal tube size induced post-extubation aspiration in patients with acute respiratory failure [35]. Related to the first limitation, additional unmeasured or potential cofounders may exist. To overcome these limitations, a randomized controlled trial should be conducted. Third, all participants were screened for PED using the MWST; however, instrumental assessment via FEES or VFSS has become implemented in recent years because these provide comprehensive picture of the swallowing process [42]. A previous prospective study showed that the FEES was safe, well tolerated, and significantly correlated with FOIS score [42]. In terms of feasibility, FEES, which can be performed at the bedside, would be preferable to VFSS in the ICU setting [43]. Nonetheless, the MWST was deemed a pragmatic bedside assessment without requiring additional equipment or resources [14, 15]. Forth, daily SLT was completely dependent on the local policies within the above-mentioned framework, and practice compliance was not examined. Therefore, standardized and validated approach to care PED patients should be established to ensure our findings. Finally, long-term follow-up may be needed, considering the profound impact of PED on quality of life.

Conclusions

In this retrospective analysis, we found that delayed timing of SLT initiation was associated with poor outcomes such as persistent dysphagia or death and aspiration pneumonia after extubation. Our observations indicate that the initiation of SLT within 24 h after extubation in patients with PED appears to be a favorable strategy for early recovery from swallowing disorders in the ICU. Since this was a retrospective study, a randomized controlled trial seems warranted to confirm these results.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets from this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

APACHE:

Acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

EN:

Enteral nutrition

FEES:

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing

FOIS:

Functional oral intake scale

IABP:

Intra-aortic balloon pump

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IQR:

Interquartile range

MWST:

Modified water swallowing test

OR:

Odds ratio

PED:

Post-extubation dysphagia

PN:

Parenteral nutrition

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

SLT:

Speech and language therapy

SLP:

Speech and language pathologist

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

VFSS:

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study

References

  1. Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010;376:1339–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Macht M, Wimbish T, Clark BJ, Benson AB, Burnham EL, Williams A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of post-extubation dysphagia: results from a national survey. J Crit Care. 2012;27:578–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Skoretz SA, Flowers HL, Martino R. The incidence of dysphagia following endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. Chest. 2010;137:665–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schefold JC, Berger D, Zürcher P, Lensch M, Perren A, Jakob SM, et al. Dysphagia in mechanically ventilated ICU patients (DYnAMICS): a prospective observational trial. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:2061–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodsky MB, Huang M, Shanholtz C, Mendez-Tellez PA, Palmer JB, Colantuoni E, et al. Recovery from dysphagia symptoms after oral endotracheal intubation in acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:376–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Macht M, King CJ, Wimbish T, Clark BJ, Benson AB, Burnham EL, et al. Post-extubation dysphagia is associated with longer hospitalization in survivors of critical illness with neurologic impairment. Crit Care. 2013;17:R119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Macht M, Wimbish T, Clark BJ, Benson AB, Burnham EL, Williams A, et al. Postextubation dysphagia is persistent and associated with poor outcomes in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care. 2011;15:R231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. El Gharib AZG, Berretin-Felix G, Rossoni DF, Seiji YS. Effectiveness of therapy on post-extubation dysphagia: clinical and electromyographic findings. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2019;12:117955061987336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duncan S, McAuley DF, Walshe M, McGaughey J, Anand R, Fallis R, et al. Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1326–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Macht M, Wimbish T, Bodine C, Moss M. ICU-acquired swallowing disorders. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brodsky MB, Mayfield EB, Gross RD. Clinical decision making in the ICU: dysphagia screening, assessment, and treatment. Semin Speech Lang. 2019;40:170–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernando SM, Seely AJE. Post-extubation dysphagia: the truth is hard to swallow. Chest. 2020;158:1806–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Horiguchi S, Suzuki Y. Screening tests in evaluating swallowing function. JMAJ. 2011;54:31–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Estupiñán-Artiles C, Regan J, Donnellan C. Dysphagia screening in residential care settings: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;114:103813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oguchi N, Yamamoto S, Terashima S, Arai R, Sato M, Ikegami S, et al. The modified water swallowing test score is the best predictor of postoperative pneumonia following extubation in cardiovascular surgery A retrospective cohort study. Medicine. 2021;100:e24478.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tohara H, Saitoh E, Mays KA, Kuhlemeier K, Palmer JB. Three tests for predicting aspiration without videofluorography. Dysphagia. 2003;18:126–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakai K, Momosaki R. Real-world effectiveness of speech therapy time on cognitive recovery in older patients with acute stroke. Prog Rehabil Med. 2016;1:20160004.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wirth R, Dziewas R, Beck AM, Clavé P, Hamdy S, Heppner HJ, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in older persons—from pathophysiology to adequate intervention: a review and summary of an international expert meeting. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:189–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Persson E, Wårdh I, Östberg P. Repetitive saliva swallowing test: norms, clinical relevance and the impact of saliva secretion. Dysphagia. 2019;34:271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McNeil JJ, Woods RL, Nelson MR, Reid CM, Kirpach B, Wolfe R, et al. Effect of aspirin on disability-free survival in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1499–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hodgson CL, Higgins AM, Bailey MJ, Mather AM, Beach L, Bellomo R, et al. The impact of COVID-19 critical illness on new disability, functional outcomes and return to work at 6 months: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2021;25:382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1516–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Galovic M, Stauber AJ, Leisi N, Krammer W, Brugger F, Vehoff J, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model of swallowing recovery and enteral tube feeding after ischemic stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:561–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zuercher P, Moret CS, Dziewas R, Schefold JC. Dysphagia in the intensive care unit: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical management. Crit Care. 2019;23:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu CP, Xu YJ, Wang TG, Ku SC, Chan DC, Lee JJ, et al. Effects of a swallowing and oral care intervention for patients following endotracheal extubation: a pre- and post-intervention study. Crit Care. 2019;23:350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lönnqvist PA. Medical research and the ethics of medical treatments: disability-free survival. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:286–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou Z, Ofori-Asenso R, Curtis AJ, Breslin M, Wolfe R, McNeil JJ, et al. Association of statin use with disability-free survival and cardiovascular disease among healthy older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:17–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun LY, Eddeen AB, Mesana TG. Disability-free survival after major cardiac surgery: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open. 2021;9:E384–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Heyland DK, Muscedere J, Drover J, Jiang X, Day AG. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: persistent organ dysfunction plus death: a novel, composite outcome measure for critical care trials. Crit Care. 2011;15:R98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Brodsky MB, Pandian V, Needham DM. Post-extubation dysphagia: a problem needing multidisciplinary efforts. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:93–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L, Hu W, Cai Z, Liu J, Wu J, Deng Y, et al. Early mobilization of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Turra GS, Schwartz IVD, Almeida ST, Martinez CC, Bridi M, Barreto SSM. Efficacy of speech therapy in post-intubation patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a randomized controlled trial. Codas. 2021;33:e20190246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bray BD, Smith CJ, Cloud GC, Enderby P, James M, Paley L, et al. The association between delays in screening for and assessing dysphagia after acute stroke, and the risk of stroke-associated pneumonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Takahata H, Tsutsumi K, Baba H, Nagata I, Yonekura M. Early intervention to promote oral feeding in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bakhtiyari J, Sarraf P, Nakhostin-Ansari N, Tafakhori A, Logemann J, Faghihzadeh S, et al. Effects of early intervention of swallowing therapy on recovery from dysphagia following stroke. Iran J Neurol. 2015;14:119–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Krisciunas GP, Langmore SE, Gomez-Taborda S, Fink D, Levitt JE, McKeehan J, et al. The association between endotracheal tube size and aspiration (during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing) in acute respiratory failure survivors. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:1604–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Beduneau G, Souday V, Richard JC, Hamel JF, Carpentier D, Chretien JM, et al. Persistent swallowing disorders after extubation in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU: a two-center prospective study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Marvin S, Thibeault S, Ehlenbach WJ. Post-extubation dysphagia: does timing of evaluation matter? Dysphagia. 2019;34:210–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zuercher P, Moret C, Schefold JC. Dysphagia in the intensive care unit in Switzerland (DICE) - results of a national survey on the current standard of care. Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cardinal LA, Freeman-Sanderson A, Togher L. The speech pathology workforce in intensive care units: results from a national survey. Aust Crit Care. 2020;33:250–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spronk PE, Spronk LEJ, Egerod I, McGaughey J, McRae J, Rose L, et al. Dysphagia in intensive care evaluation (DICE): an international cross-sectional survey. Dysphagia. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10389-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dziewas R, Auf dem Brinke M, Birkmann U, Bräuer G, Busch K, Cerra F, et al. Safety and clinical impact of FEES—results of the FEES-registry. Neurol Res Pract. 2019;1:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Dziewas R, Allescher HD, Aroyo I, Bartolome G, Beilenhoff U, Bohlender J, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia—S1 guideline of the German Society of Neurology. Neurol Res Pract. 2021;3:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Japanese Society of Education for Physicians and Trainees in Intensive Care-Clinical Trial Group (JSEPTIC-CTG) for suggesting the study concept and design. The authors thank Christine Burr for editing the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaityo, Okayama Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan

    Takashi Hongo

  2. Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan

    Takashi Hongo, Tetsuya Yumoto, Hiromichi Naito & Atsunori Nakao

  3. Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Kyoto Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Ryohei Yamamoto

  4. Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Rd, Chermside, Brisbane, QLD, 4032, Australia

    Keibun Liu

  5. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashicho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-0041, Japan

    Takahiko Yaguchi

  6. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Hamamatsu Naka-ku, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan

    Hisashi Dote & Ryusuke Saito

  7. Department of Emergency, Misato Kenwa Hospital, 4-494-1 Takano, Misato, Saitama, 341-0035, Japan

    Tomoyuki Masuyama

  8. Department of Anesthesiology, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Okayama Minami-ku, Okayama, 702-8055, Japan

    Kosuke Nakatsuka

  9. Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya Medical Center, NHO, 4-1-1 Sannomaru, , Nagoya Naka-ku, Aichi, 461-0001, Japan

    Shinichi Watanabe

  10. Department of Rehabilitation, Hokkaido Medical Center, NHO, 7-1-1 Yamanote5jo, Sapporo Nishi-ku, Hokkaido, 063-0005, Japan

    Takahiro Kanaya

  11. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijonishimachi, Nara, Nara, 630-8581, Japan

    Tomoya Yamaguchi

Authors
  1. Takashi Hongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryohei Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keibun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takahiko Yaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hisashi Dote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ryusuke Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tomoyuki Masuyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kosuke Nakatsuka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shinichi Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Takahiro Kanaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tomoya Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tetsuya Yumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hiromichi Naito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Atsunori Nakao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TH, RY, KL, TYu, and HN designed the concept of the study. TH, RY, TYag, HD, RS, TM, KN, SW, TK, TYam, and HN conducted the study and performed the data acquisition. TH, RY, KL, TYu, HN, and AN assessed the quality of the study and performed the analysis and interpretation. TH, RY, TYu, HN, and AN wrote the manuscript, and the other authors made substantial revisions and edits. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Yumoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by ethics committee of the Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, ID: 210506. Patient consent was waived for all participants enrolled in this study because of the retrospective study design.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Characteristics of each institution and ICU

Additional file 2

: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of association between the timing of SLT initiation and outcomes, alternating the definition of dysphagia as FOIS < 6

Additional file 3

: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of association between the timing of SLT initiation and outcomes, excluding those who had gastrointestinal surgery

Additional file 4

: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of association between the timing of SLT initiation and outcomes, excluding fatal cases

Additional file 5

: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of association between the timing of SLT initiation and outcomes, adjusting for different covariates

Additional file 6

: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of association between the timing of SLT initiation and outcomes, stratifying the population into three groups.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hongo, T., Yamamoto, R., Liu, K. et al. Association between timing of speech and language therapy initiation and outcomes among post-extubation dysphagia patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Crit Care 26, 98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03974-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03974-6

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535