Skip to main content
Download PDF

Bedside estimates of dead space using end-tidal CO2 are independently associated with mortality in ARDS

Critical Care volume 25, Article number: 333 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), dead space fraction has been independently associated with mortality. We hypothesized that early measurement of the difference between arterial and end-tidal CO2 (arterial-ET difference), a surrogate for dead space fraction, would predict mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.

Methods

We performed two separate exploratory analyses. We first used publicly available databases from the ALTA, EDEN, and OMEGA ARDS Network trials (N = 124) as a derivation cohort to test our hypothesis. We then performed a separate retrospective analysis of patients with ARDS using University of Chicago patients (N = 302) as a validation cohort.

Results

The ARDS Network derivation cohort demonstrated arterial-ET difference, vasopressor requirement, age, and APACHE III to be associated with mortality by univariable analysis. By multivariable analysis, only the arterial-ET difference remained significant (P = 0.047). In a separate analysis, the modified Enghoff equation ((PaCO2–PETCO2)/PaCO2) was used in place of the arterial-ET difference and did not alter the results. The University of Chicago cohort found arterial-ET difference, age, ventilator mode, vasopressor requirement, and APACHE II to be associated with mortality in a univariate analysis. By multivariable analysis, the arterial-ET difference continued to be predictive of mortality (P = 0.031). In the validation cohort, substitution of the arterial-ET difference for the modified Enghoff equation showed similar results.

Conclusion

Arterial to end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) difference is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with ARDS.

Introduction

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is an acute inflammatory process which leads to protein-rich, non-hydrostatic pulmonary edema with reduced lung compliance, refractory hypoxemia, and impaired ability to eliminate carbon dioxide [1]. This inefficiency in CO2 elimination is caused by increased physiologic dead space as microvascular injury reduces perfusion of ventilated alveoli. Despite advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology in ARDS and identification of improved strategies that prevent further ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) [2], mortality in ARDS remains high [1].

Given the high morbidity and mortality of ARDS, it is important to identify reliable prognostic indicators, not only to predict outcomes in individual patients, but also to stratify patients for clinical trials and escalation of supportive measures. In addition to patient characteristics such as age and severity of illness, various physiologic parameters associated with ARDS have been identified to stratify disease severity and outcomes. These physiologic parameters include driving pressure [3], PaO2:FiO2 ratio, and physiologic dead space [4]. In a prior study by Nuckton et al. [5], the dead-space fraction (Vd/Vt) was measured early in patients with ARDS and was independently correlated with survival. These investigators noted that mean dead-space fraction was markedly elevated (0.58 ± 0.09) early in the course of ARDS and was higher among patients who died than those who survived (0.63 ± 0.10 vs 0.54 ± 0.09; P < 0.001).

Unfortunately, measuring lung dead-space at the bedside is not easy. It requires collection of expired gas into a reservoir bag for several minutes and is not routinely employed outside research study circumstances. In contrast, arterial CO2 and end-tidal CO2 are both measured frequently in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Continuous end-tidal CO2 monitoring provides insight into three main functions: metabolism, circulation, and ventilation [6, 7]. The pulmonary pathophysiology of ARDS includes increased dead space fraction in addition to shunt [8, 9]. There are several mechanisms by which increased dead space may occur in ARDS. These include alveolar capillary injury, in situ microvascular thrombosis, and small airways and/or alveolar epithelial injury with V/Q mismatch. Additionally, reduction in right ventricular function may lead to higher dead space by an increase in West zone I and II perfusion [10].

The arterial to end-tidal CO2 difference should follow the directional change of the dead space fraction. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the arterial-ET difference would predict mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS and sought to test this hypothesis with an exploratory analysis in a cohort from the ARDS Network public database (https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov). Following the exploratory analysis, we sought to validate our hypothesis in a cohort of medical ICU patients at the University of Chicago.

Methods

Patient cohort

We used the ARDS Network database (https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov) as our derivation cohort. In a review of the eight available ARDS Network databases, three contained both end-tidal CO2 and arterial CO2 measurements. These three databases (OMEGA [11], ALTA [12], and EDEN [13]) were included in the exploratory analysis.

For our validation cohort, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with ARDS [4] at the University of Chicago from January 2010 through October 2019. With the assistance of the University of Chicago Center for Research Informatics, we queried our local Epic electronic medical record (Verona, WI) data warehouse using the following criteria: age > 18 years, inpatient or emergency encounters, index encounters, and ICD9/10 codes for ARDS, Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Respiratory Failure, Ventilator Support, Hypoxia, and Hypoxemia. The study was approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Review Board (IRB) with a waiver of consent for this de-identified retrospective analysis. We used the STROBE cohort checklist when writing our report [14].

Exclusion criteria included: age < 18, pregnancy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during the first 24 h, and those with > 50 pack-year smoking history (to avoid patients with COPD and the inherent pre-existing impact on dead space fraction). We also excluded patients with COPD on pulmonary function tests and/or emphysema on chest high-resolution CT scans based upon a blinded review by a senior pulmonologist (JPK). Lastly, patients without reported end-tidal CO2 values within the first 24 h after ARDS diagnosis were excluded.

Measurements of the arterial-ET difference

Because both derivation and validation cohorts were retrospective analyses, simultaneous arterial and end-tidal CO2 measurements could not be collected by protocol. We recorded arterial blood gases measured during the first 24 h after the diagnosis of ARDS was established. In order to be included in the analyses, end-tidal CO2 must have been recorded within 1 h of the arterial blood gas with no ventilator changes between arterial and end tidal CO2 measurements. For all analyses, we used the arterial CO2 and end-tidal CO2 measured on day one of ARDS diagnosis only. The physiologic dead space was estimated using two methods. First by calculating the difference between arterial and end-title CO2 (PaCO2–PETCO2). Second, we substituted end-title CO2 for mean exhaled CO2 in the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation. We will refer to this as the simplified Enghoff modification ((PaCO2–PETCO2)/PaCO2).

Statistical analysis

The primary outcome variable for both cohorts was in-hospital mortality. Logistic-regression analysis was used to examine multiple variables in order to determine independent association(s) with mortality. Independent variables were chosen on the basis of prior ARDS studies as well as biological plausibility. All variables associated with mortality by univariable analysis (P < 0.10) were included in the multivariable models. We began with our derivation analysis using the 124 patient cohort gathered from the ARDS network database. Demographics, comorbidities, physiological characteristics, ventilator parameters, and outcomes were compared using Chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U for continuous variables.

The following independent variables were considered: age, gender, APACHE score, tidal volume per ideal body weight, arterial-ET difference, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), and ECMO use during hospitalization. A second model was created where the simplified Enghoff equation ((PaCO2–PETCO2)/PaCO2) was substituted for the arterial to end-tidal difference. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all comparisons. All analyses were performed using Stata 16.1 (College Station, TX) and R [15].

Results

The ARDS Network database yielded a total of 124 patients to serve as the derivation cohort. Our original query from the University of Chicago medical records found 499 patients for our validation cohort. After review of each record, we identified 302 patients who met our a priori inclusion criteria. The most common reasons that patients were excluded were: COPD/emphysema (N = 52), the absence of PaCO2 and ETCO2 data within an hour of each other (N = 112), and other (N = 33).

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. When comparing clinical characteristics, the University of Chicago cohort was significantly older, had more severe ARDS, and a higher mortality.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of ARDS patients
Full size table

Gender, tidal volume per ideal body weight, PEEP, and ECMO use during hospitalization were not significant in univariable analyses for either derivation or validation cohorts. Accordingly, these independent variables were not introduced into the multiple logistic-regression models for either analysis.

In the ARDS Network cohort, four variables were associated with mortality by univariable analysis: arterial-ET difference, age, vasopressor requirement, and APACHE III. By multivariable analysis, only the arterial-ET difference remained significant (Table 2). A model substituting the simplified Enghoff equation in place of the arterial-ET difference also demonstrated the estimation of dead space to be the only significant variable (Table 3).

Table 2 Multivariable analysis of derivation cohort using arterial-ET difference: ARDS net database
Full size table
Table 3 Multivariable analysis of derivation cohort using simplified Enghoff equation: ARDS net database
Full size table

In the University of Chicago validation cohort, five variables were associated with mortality by univariable analysis: arterial-ET difference, ventilator mode, vasopressor requirement, age, and APACHE II. By multivariable analysis, age, APACHE, vasopressor requirement, and the arterial-ET difference remained significant (Table 4). Similarly, replacing the arterial-ET difference with the simplified Enghoff equation, these variables, including estimation of deadspace, continued to be significant variables in the model (Table 5).

Table 4 Multivariable analysis of validation cohort: University of Chicago
Full size table
Table 5 Multivariable analysis of derivation cohort using simplified Enghoff equation: University of Chicago
Full size table

In the ARDS net cohort, the arterial-ET difference was significantly higher in non-survivors (median 10 mmHg, IQR 7–12) compared to those who survived (median 5 mmHg, IQR 2–11) by univariable analysis (P < 0.005). The same was seen in the University of Chicago cohort (median 15 mmHg, IQR 10–23 vs median 12 mmHg, IQR 8–17, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). Importantly, the arterial-ET difference was independently associated with an increased risk of death in the multiple regression analysis in both cohorts using either arterial-ET difference or simplified Enghoff estimation of dead space. For every increase of 1 mmHg in the arterial-end tidal CO2 difference, the odds of death were 1.10 and 1.03 times higher in the ARDS Network and the University of Chicago cohorts, respectively (Tables 2, 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Box plot of arterial end-tidal CO2 difference stratified by mortality in the ARDS Net and University of Chicago cohorts

Full size image

Discussion

ARDS is a common reason for critical illness and respiratory failure with high mortality [16], making routinely collected measurements that accurately predict outcomes of utmost importance. They may assist in clinical management and prognostication as well as stratification of patients enrolled in clinical trials. Several physiologic parameters available at the bedside have been described to serve these purposes including P/F ratio [4], oxygenation index [17], driving pressure [3], and dead space [5]. Dead space can be measured by the Bohr method [18], but this requires collection of expired gas and measurement of expired PCO2 and arterial PCO2. Here, we present that the estimation of dead space by either the arterial-ET difference or the simplified Enghoff modification equation is independently predictive of mortality in critically ill patients with ARDS.

A potential alternative to the direct measurement of dead space is the use of the arterial to end-tidal PCO2 difference, which theoretically should be a reliable estimate of dead space. To date, there are limited data supporting this inference. Very early studies by Severinghaus, et al. [19] and others [20, 21] showed that this difference tracked with changes in dead space and the degree of ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch in healthy animal models. Nunn et al. [22] obtained arterial-ET differences in 12 healthy anesthetized patients and proposed this measurement as the simplest method of demonstrating the existence of V/Q mismatch. Shetty et al. evaluated 215 patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) and the arterial-ET difference modestly predicted adverse outcomes in patients presenting with suspected sepsis due to non-respiratory causes. Those with normal arterial-ET differences were noted to have much lower risk for hospital mortality and prolonged ICU length of stay [23]. Yamanaka et al. [24] studied 17 patients requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation using an average of exhaled PCO2 at the end of several breaths over a duration of 30 s and found that the difference between arterial and exhaled CO2 correlated closely with physiological dead space (r = 0.80, P < 0.05). Similarly, a prospective study in 106 trauma patients requiring emergency surgery noted that the arterial-ET difference was lower during all phases of surgery in survivors (5.8 ± 4.5 vs. 16.5 ± 14.7 mm Hg) (P < 0.001) [25]. In another study that included 412 patients presenting to the ED with shortness of breath, ETCO2 was measured with a sampling cannula. A difference > 10 mm Hg was strongly predictive of the need for positive pressure ventilation via face mask or endotracheal tube (AUC 0.91 [95% CI 0.87–0.94]) [7]. In our current study, high estimations of deadspace measured within the first 24 h of ARDS onset were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. These statistically significant associations persisted with multiple cohorts and when using either the artieral-ET difference or simplified Enghoff equation. Accordingly, we believe that the arterial-ET difference and the simplified Enghoff equation can be useful for early prognostication in ARDS patients in a highly generalizable manner.

Our study has strengths and limitations. Our validation cohort was derived from a single-center analysis. Mortality in the University of Chicago cohort group was significantly higher than the ARDS Network group. This difference is likely explained by the University of Chicago cohort being significantly older and having dramatically worse gas exchange by P/F ratio. Both derivation and validation cohorts found the arterial-ET difference or simplified Enghoff equation to be an independent predictor of mortality, which speaks to the generalizability of our findings. This is a retrospective study with no precise timing between difference measurements. In order to minimize changes in the difference between arterial and end-tidal CO2, we required that the two measurements occurred no more than 1 h apart and with no modifications of ventilator settings. Given that arterial blood-gas and ETCO2 measurements are largely dependent on temporal hemodynamic and respiratory factors, our study is limited by potential disparities due to the rapid, time-dependent fluctuations of the measured variables. The use of volumetric capnometry may be a more accurate measurement than ETCO2, given that it allows the separation of physiologic dead space from apparent changes in dead space due to shunt and thus can give a more precise indication of physiological mechanism; however, it is often not practical in the ICU setting. Optimization of future investigation of the association between dead space fraction and mortality could include measuring the arterial blood gas and ETCO2 at the same time to reduce the risk of hemodynamic changes potentially skewing the data.

Conclusions

In summary, we identified the arterial-ET difference or the simplified Enghoff equation as independently associated with ARDS mortality. Bedside estimation of dead space early after the diagnosis of ARDS may provide useful prognostic information for ICU care providers.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed for the derivation cohort during the current study are available in the ARDS Network Public Database repository, [https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov]. The datasets used and analyzed during the current study for the validation cohort are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rezoagli E, Fumagalli R, Bellani G. Definition and epidemiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(14):282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Network ARDS, Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Force ADT, Ranieri V, Rubenfeld G, Thompson B, Ferguson N, Caldwell E. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nuckton TJ, Alonso JA, Kallet RH, Daniel BM, Pittet J-F, Eisner MD, et al. Pulmonary dead-space fraction as a risk factor for death in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(17):1281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siobal MS. Monitoring exhaled carbon dioxide. Respir Care. 2016;61(10):1397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shetty AL, Lai KH, Byth K. The CO2 GAP Project–CO2 GAP as a prognostic tool in emergency departments. Emerg Med Australas. 2010;22(6):524–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Radermacher P, Maggiore SM, Mercat A. Fifty years of research in ARDS. Gas exchange in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(8):964–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferluga M, Lucangelo U, Blanch L. Dead space in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(19):388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Right ventricular function and positive pressure ventilation in clinical practice: from hemodynamic subsets to respirator settings. Intensive Care Med 2003;29(9):1426–34.

  11. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, DeBoisblanc BP, Steingrub J, Rock P. Enteral omega-3 fatty acid, γ-linolenic acid, and antioxidant supplementation in acute lung injury. JAMA. 2011;306(14):1574–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. National Heart L, Network BIARDSCT. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of an aerosolized β2-agonist for treatment of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(5):561–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Heart L, Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials N, Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, et al. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(8):795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poorolajal J, Cheraghi Z, Irani AD, Rezaeian S. Quality of cohort studies reporting post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. Epidemiol Health. 2011;33:e2011005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu X. Applied ordinal logistic regression using Stata: from single-level to multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, Arabi YM, Beitler JR, Mercat A, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seeley E, McAuley DF, Eisner M, Miletin M, Matthay MA, Kallet RH. Predictors of mortality in acute lung injury during the era of lung protective ventilation. Thorax. 2008;63(11):994–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bohr C. Ueber die lungenathmung. Skand Arch Physiol. 1891;2(236):68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Severinghaus J, Stupfel M. Alveolar dead space as an index of distribution of blood flow in pulmonary capillaries. J Appl Physiol. 1957;10(3):335–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mosing M, Böhm SH, Rasis A, Hoosgood G, Auer U, Tusman G, et al. Physiologic factors influencing the arterial-to-end-tidal CO2 difference and the alveolar dead space fraction in spontaneously breathing anesthetised horses. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer RE, Short CE. Arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension and alveolar dead space in halothane-or isoflurane-anesthetized ponies. Am J Vet Res. 1985;46(3):597–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nunn J, Hill D. Respiratory dead space and arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension difference in anesthetized man. J Appl Physiol. 1960;15(3):383–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shetty A, Sparenberg S, Adams K, Selvedran S, Tang B, Hanna K, et al. Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference (CO2 gap) as a prognostic marker for adverse outcomes in emergency department patients presenting with suspected sepsis. Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30(6):794–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamanaka MK, Sue DY. Comparison of arterial-end-tidal PCO2 difference and dead space/tidal volume ratio in respiratory failure. Chest. 1987;92(5):832–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tyburski JG, Collinge JD, Wilson RF, Carlin AM, Albaran RG, Steffes CP. End-tidal CO2-derived values during emergency trauma surgery correlated with outcome: a prospective study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2002;53(4):738–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Research supported by NIH 5T-32 HL 007605-36 and NIH/NHLBI K23 HL14 8387.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Pulmonology and Critical Care, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave. MC 6026, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Paola Lecompte-Osorio, Steven D. Pearson, Matthew R. Stutz, Anne S. Pohlman, Jesse B. Hall, Krysta Wolfe, Bhakti K. Patel & John P. Kress

  2. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Cole H. Pieroni

  3. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Julie Lin

  4. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA

    Yu M. Htwe, Patrick G. Belvitch & Steven M. Dudek

Authors
  1. Paola Lecompte-Osorio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven D. Pearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cole H. Pieroni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew R. Stutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anne S. Pohlman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Julie Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jesse B. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yu M. Htwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Patrick G. Belvitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Steven M. Dudek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Krysta Wolfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Bhakti K. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. John P. Kress
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PL contributed to the conception, design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. SP contributed to the analysis, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions. CP contributed to the analysis, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. MS contributed to the interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions. BP contributed to the acquisition, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions. KW contributed to the analysis of data, drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions. AP contributed to the acquisition of data, drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions. JL contributed to the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. JH contributed to the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. YH contributed to the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data; approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. PB contributed to the analysis of data, drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. SD contributed to the analysis, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. JK contributed to the conception, design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data; drafted the work, approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Kress.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Review Board (IRB) with waiver of consent for this de-identified retrospective analysis.

Consent for publications

The study was approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Review Board (IRB) with a waiver of consent for this de-identified retrospective analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lecompte-Osorio, P., Pearson, S.D., Pieroni, C.H. et al. Bedside estimates of dead space using end-tidal CO2 are independently associated with mortality in ARDS. Crit Care 25, 333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03751-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03751-x

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535