Skip to main content

Tailored modulation of the inflammatory balance in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU?—a viewpoint

Abstract

A growing consensus seems to be emerging that dexamethasone is a crucial component in the treatment of COVID-19-associated oxygen-dependent respiratory failure. Although dexamethasone has an undeniably beneficial effect on the inflammatory response in a subgroup of patients, the potential negative effects of corticosteroids must also be considered. In view of these negative effects, we argue that a one-size-fits-all dexamethasone approach may be potentially harmful in specific subsets of patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS. We propose a different individually tailored treatment strategy based on the patient’s inflammatory response.

Background

The first COVID-19 wave of patients hit the Netherlands in March–April 2020. The ICU caregivers were initially overwhelmed by this new disease with signs and symptoms not experienced before. The autopsy studies soon revealed a heterogeneous disease with diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) acute fibrinous injury and organizing pneumonia in combination with endothelial cells activation causing microvascular thrombosis, pulmonary infarcts and venous thromboembolism [1, 2]. These findings are consistent with the diverse clinical presentation of severe COVID-19 marked by severe ARDS, activation of coagulation and clot formation, and in a subset of patients signs of a proinflammatory status [3].

To elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this heterogeneous disease, much attention was initially paid to the inflammatory response in COVID-19 [4,5,6], which led to various therapeutic strategies that target this inflammatory response.

Targeting inflammation in COVID-19

The circulating cytokine levels in COVID-19-associated ARDS are lower in comparison with ARDS of different origins [5, 6]. The clinical picture is not characterized by a systemic cytokine storm, and signs of hyperinflammation are only seen in a subset of patients [7]. These combined results suggest that COVID-19-associated ARDS could be a mixture of both hypo- and hyperinflammatory subtypes, as previously described in ARDS of different origins [8]. Nevertheless, the focus in research and treatment modalities has mainly been on hyperinflammation. Building on the assumption that the hyperinflammatory response is an important driver in the pathogenesis of activation of coagulation, as well as alveolar damage and fibrosis, several investigators advocated the use of inflammatory modulators, i.e., high-dose corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, anakinra or tocilizumab [9,10,11]. Corticosteroids are still the main and most frequently used intervention to modulate inflammation in ICU patients. Corticosteroids have been accepted with some restraint in ARDS patients, because of incongruent results regarding mortality reduction in the corticosteroid groups [12,13,14,15]. For example, the study by Meduri et al. showed significant ICU mortality reduction (20.6% vs 42.9%; p = 0.03) if corticosteroids were initiated early in the disease course with 1 mg/kg/day up to 28 days [15]. On the other hand, Steinberg et al. showed no mortality reduction in ARDS when treated with corticosteroids initiated after 7 days of mechanical ventilation [13]. In fact, a reduction in mortality due to corticosteroids as salvage therapy when initiated later in the disease course has not been demonstrated to date and could possibly even lead to higher mortality. Nevertheless, a meta-analysis of the largest studies demonstrated a positive effect of corticosteroids, if timely initiated, on mortality in ARDS (20 vs. 33%; p = 0.006) [16]. This was corroborated recently in a randomized trial that showed a significant mortality reduction of 15.3% (-25.9 to -4.9, p = 0.0047) in patients with ARDS if dexamethasone was initiated early with a dose of 20 mg dexamethasone IV daily for five days, followed by 10 mg daily for the next five days [17].

Although several issues are far from settled, i.e., optimal timing, dose and tapering schedules of corticosteroids in ARDS, early application of corticosteroids is currently recommended for ARDS as part of ESICM and SCCM guidelines [18]. We refer the reader to other sources for a more in-depth discussion of this subject in ARDS [19,20,21].

We would like to focus on the use of corticosteroids in COVID-19 now. The use of corticosteroids was discouraged in the first wave of COVID-19 for fear of prolonged viral shedding [22, 23]. The first study to show a positive effect of corticosteroids in COVID-19 was the pragmatic and randomized RECOVERY trial. This trial showed a reduced 28-day mortality in patients who received 6 mg dexamethasone on top of usual care in patients who were treated with supplemental oxygen (23.3% vs 26.2%) or were mechanically ventilated (29.3% vs 41.4%) [11]. Noteworthy was that in patients with short-term complaints (≤ 7 days) women and the elderly (> 70 years) there was only a trend toward a positive effect. This was most likely due to a lack of lack of statistical power, not a lack of efficacy. Unfortunately, the results of the RECOVERY trial halted other randomized studies on the effect of corticosteroids in COVID-19.

One of the terminated studies was the French CAPE COVID study. This randomized clinical trial was halted after enrollment of 149 patients with severe COVID-19 on the ICU (76 corticosteroids, 73 placebo). The endpoint of that study was treatment failure on day 21, i.e., death or persistent mechanical ventilation. Subjects were randomized between placebo or 200 mg/d hydrocortisone until day 7 and then decreased to 100 mg/d for 4 days and 50 mg/d for 3 days, for a total of 14 days. The preliminary results showed no significant difference between the placebo group (50.7%) and the corticosteroid group (42.1%) [24].

The Brazilian CoDEX study, a multicenter randomized study, was ceased after publication of the RECOVERY trial as well. All subjects in this trial were mechanically ventilated and randomized between 20 mg dexamethasone for 5 days (optionally followed by 10 mg for an additional 5 days or until discharge from ICU) and standard of care. Until halting the study, 299 patients had been enrolled and 148 were randomized to standard care and 151 to corticosteroids. The mean number of days free from mechanical ventilation, the primary study endpoint, was higher in the corticosteroid group than in the standard of care group (difference, 2.26; 95% CI 0.2–4.38; P = 0.04) [25]. A third study that was discontinued after the results of the RECOVERY trial was the corticosteroid study arm of the adaptive platform trial REMAP-CAP. In this study, patients were 1:1:1 randomized between a fixed dose of 50 mg intravenous hydrocortisone every 6 h for 7 days, 50 mg every 6 h for up to 28 days while in shock, or no corticosteroids. The trial was stopped after inclusion of 403 patients. On the primary endpoint of organ support-free days, treatment with a 7-day fixed-dose course of hydrocortisone or shock-dependent dosing of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, resulted in 93% and 80% probabilities of superiority, respectively, with regard to the odds of improvement in organ support-free days within 21 days [26]. A meta-analysis of the effect of corticosteroids on mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients soon followed. In the 1703 patients analyzed, the summary OR for mortality was 0.70 (95% CI 0.48–1.01; P = 0.053) with OR of 0.64 (95% CI 0.50–0.82; P < 0.001) for dexamethasone. Subsequently, as of May 2020, routine use of 6 mg dexamethasone for 10 days in oxygen-dependent COVID-19 patients became the new standard of care [27]. Although this meta-analysis showed a convincingly positive effect of corticosteroids on 28-day all-cause mortality, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with some caution due to the absence of stratification and incomplete information about some factors associated with outcome in the included trials [28].

In addition to the use of corticosteroid therapy, more recent studies of anti-IL-6 therapy have also shown reduced mortality in COVID-19-associated ARDS in general [29, 30]. The results of the aforementioned RECOVERY Group of anti-IL6 therapy in conjunction with corticosteroids showed a mortality reduction from 33 to 29% [30]. In the recently published REMAP-CAP trial, a 90-day survival gain (OR 1.61, 95% credible interval 1.25 to 2.08) was seen from anti-IL-6 therapy (i.e., tocilizumab/sarilimumab) in conjunction with corticosteroids for the entire group of severe COVID-19 patients as well [29]. What the exact role of anti-IL-6 therapy will prove to be, in light of the negative COVACTA trial, is to be further elucidated [31]. We may have to conclude that anti-IL-6 therapy only affects final outcome if it is combined with corticosteroids [32, 33].

Despite the potential benefits of corticosteroid modulation of the immune response in COVID-19-associated ARDS, its use also may carry significant risks including an increased risk of secondary infections and important long-term disadvantages such as muscle wasting [25, 34,35,36,37]. Although the benefits of dexamethasone for oxygen-dependent COVID-19 patients in general are well demonstrated, we do argue that the one-size-fits-all corticosteroid approach may be potentially harmful in specific subsets of COVID-19 patients. We propose a different individually tailored treatment strategy.

Tailored immune modulation in COVID-19?

To identify the patients who may benefit most from inhibiting inflammation using dexamethasone, it is important to realize that COVID-19, similar to classical ARDS, is most likely a heterogeneous and complex disease, characterized by both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory subphenotypes and highly variable histopathological subtypes ranging from diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), bronchopneumonia, necrotizing bronchiolitis to viral pneumonia [1, 8, 38].

In the anti-inflammatory subphenotype, there is probably not only a lack of benefit, but also a potential for harm if corticosteroids are applied in the absence of inflammation. This is illustrated by a recent retrospective analysis on the effects of dexamethasone in COVID-19 [39]. If patients had a C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 200 mg/l, there was a high potential for benefit of corticosteroids in COVID-19 ARDS with a lower mortality (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08–0.70). In contrast, if CRP levels were only mildly elevated (≤ 100), this benefit dissipated and mortality increased (OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.39–5.03). Furthering this hypothesis, one may hypothesize (Fig. 1) that dexamethasone indeed mitigates the proinflammatory response at alveolar level in a subgroup of COVID-19, but it may also tip the balance toward anti-inflammatory aspects in a subset of patients (Fig. 2). Those patients may be more prone to outgrowth of Aspergillus spp. or herpes simplex reactivations (Fig. 3.) [40,41,42]. We propose a more practical approach to tailored therapy in COVID-19-associated ARDS (Fig. 4). The premise is that timely treatment with corticosteroids is essential in the treatment of COVID-19 but that it has no added value if systemic inflammation is lacking. Ideally, an extensive analysis of alveolar cytokine levels inflammatory response and degree of fibrosis could guide tailored therapy. Analysis of this alveolar inflammatory response has been performed in small patient groups, showing a distinct difference with systemic inflammatory response [43, 44]. However, such analysis is hardly available in usual clinical practice. In addition, it is unclear how these results should be interpreted when initiating immunomodulatory therapy. This means that, in principle, corticosteroids are started or continued if they had already been started in COVID-19 patients on the ward. If there are no signs of inflammation (i.e., CRP < 50, low-dose vasopressor and the absence of fever, tachycardia and tachypnea) immediately upon admission to the ICU, the corticosteroids may probably be discontinued. In addition, we argue for extra vigilance of secondary infections as a result of the use of immune-modulating therapy, especially in respiratory deterioration after 3–7 days after initiation of corticosteroids. In such a case, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) should be performed with specific attention for signs and symptoms of infections caused by opportunistic pathogens. In case of systemic inflammation (e.g., CRP ≥ 200, tachycardia, high-dose vasopressor, fever, tachycardia and tachypnea) and deteriorating lung compliance despite the absence of positive fluid balances, corticosteroids should be continued or even increased in case of aggravating signs of inflammatory response while awaiting results of extensive cultures including bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) [15]. Empirically starting antifungals agents and/or antivirals agents may be considered in this setting as well, depending on the clinical status of the patient.

Fig. 1
figure1

Inflammatory response and effects of corticosteroids on inflammation. This simplified cartoon illustrates the presumed pathophysiological steps during SARS-COV2 infection. The first step is the infection of type-2 pneumocytes and macrophages with SARS-CoV2 via the ACE-2 receptor, leading to the activation of alveolar macrophages. Activated macrophages release proinflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-1B, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) and suppress the anti-inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-10, IL-1 receptor antagonist (RA)), promoting the infiltration of neutrophils in the alveolus. Toxic mediators are released by these neutrophils and cause further damage to the endothelial–epithelial barrier, initiating additional damage to the endothelial–epithelial barrier. Eventually, damage to these endothelial–epithelial cells, together with the loss of tight junctions and surfactant, leads to the influx of protein-rich fluid edema in the alveolar compartment which impairs gas exchange. Later, fibroblasts start to proliferate and growth factors are produced. This pro-inflammatory response can be suppressed by corticosteroids. Corticosteroids can freely diffuse the plasma membrane to bind to specific receptors. Upon binding to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), the complex translocates to the nucleus where it interacts with glucocorticoid response elements (GRE), nuclear factor kB (NFKB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1). This interaction results in suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines synthesis, influx and activation of neutrophils and impairment of macrophage autophagy. As a consequence, patients are more susceptible for secondary infections [3, 49, 50].

Fig. 2
figure2

The balance between suppressing the inflammatory response in COVID-19-associated ARDS and the risk of secondary infections due to corticosteroid use

Fig. 3
figure3

Box showing illustrative data of increased occurrence of secondary infections in our institution. All patients with a CAPA had a pulmonary infiltrate on conventional X-ray or chest CT, clinical deterioration and a positive VIRCLIA® Aspergillus chemiluminescent immunoassay on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, in accordance with the CAPA definition. HSV pneumonitis was diagnosed if there were a positive HSV PCR in BALF, a positive PCR in plasma and a cytological HSV staining in BALF in combination with respiratory deterioration with pulmonary infiltrate on conventional X-ray or chest CT

Fig. 4
figure4

Flowchart with suggested diagnostic approach of secondary infections and the use of steroids in COVID-19-associated ARDS (15)

In addition, one may also hypothesize a rationale for IFN beta-1b treatment in the patients with an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Results of treatment with IFN beta-1b in COVID-19 patients have been conflicting, i.e., benefit in combination with anti-viral drugs in one small study and no mortality reduction in the SOLIDARITY trial [45,46,47]. Despite the apparently lower levels of type II interferons in severe COVID-19, IFNy has not been applied in a clinical trial up to now [48]. The lack of beneficial effect of IFN beta-1b in combination with glucocorticoids in a large non-selected COVID-19 population might be explained by failure to stratify for inflammatory status. Studies should be designed and executed to evaluate the potential role of type I and type II interferons in the setting of dexamethasone-treated COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion

The use of corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients has increased significantly since the publication of the RECOVERY trial [11]. However, the generalized non-tailored use of corticosteroids might tip the balance to a subset of patients with anti-inflammatory aspects, necessitating a more tailored therapy with vigilance for reactivation of HSV and/or secondary infections with Aspergillus spp.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Remmelink M, De Mendonça R, D’Haene N, De Clercq S, Verocq C, Lebrun L, et al. Unspecific post-mortem findings despite multiorgan viral spread in COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Carsana L, Sonzogni A, Nasr A, Rossi RS, Pellegrinelli A, Zerbi P, et al. Pulmonary post-mortem findings in a series of COVID-19 cases from northern Italy: a two-centre descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(10):1135–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McGonagle D, Sharif K, O’Regan A, Bridgewood C. The role of cytokines including interleukin-6 in COVID-19 induced pneumonia and macrophage activation syndrome-like disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(6):102537.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Leisman DE, Ronner L, Pinotti R, Taylor MD, Sinha P, Calfee CS, et al. Cytokine elevation in severe and critical COVID-19: a rapid systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison with other inflammatory syndromes. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:1233–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    McElvaney OJ, McEvoy NL, McElvaney OF, Carroll TP, Murphy MP, Dunlea DM, et al. Characterization of the inflammatory response to severe COVID-19 illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(6):812–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kox M, Waalders NJB, Kooistra EJ, Gerretsen J, Pickkers P. Cytokine levels in critically Ill patients with COVID-19 and other conditions. JAMA. 2020;324(15):1565–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17052.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Manson JJ, Crooks C, Naja M, Ledlie A, Goulden B, Liddle T, et al. COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation and escalation of patient care: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2(10):e594–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA, et al. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(8):611–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Somers EC, Eschenauer GA, Troost JP, Golob JL, Gandhi TN, Wang L, et al. Tocilizumab for treatment of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020.

  10. 10.

    Li L, Zhang W, Hu Y, Tong X, Zheng S, Yang J, et al. Effect of convalescent plasma therapy on time to clinical improvement in patients with severe and life-threatening COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(5):460–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Annane D, Sébille V, Bellissant E, Group G-I-S. Effect of low doses of corticosteroids in septic shock patients with or without early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(1):22–30.

  13. 13.

    Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Goodman RB, Hough CL, Lanken PN, Hyzy R, et al. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(16):1671–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tongyoo S, Permpikul C, Mongkolpun W, Vattanavanit V, Udompanturak S, Kocak M, et al. Hydrocortisone treatment in early sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Meduri GU, Golden E, Freire AX, Taylor E, Zaman M, Carson SJ, et al. Methylprednisolone infusion in early severe ARDS: results of a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2007;131(4):954–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Meduri GU, Bridges L, Shih MC, Marik PE, Siemieniuk RAC, Kocak M. Prolonged glucocorticoid treatment is associated with improved ARDS outcomes: analysis of individual patients’ data from four randomized trials and trial-level meta-analysis of the updated literature. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(5):829–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Villar J, Ferrando C, Martínez D, Ambrós A, Muñoz T, Soler JA, et al. Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(3):267–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Annane D, Pastores SM, Rochwerg B, Arlt W, Balk RA, Beishuizen A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in critically ill patients (Part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(12):1751–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Arabi YM, Chrousos GP, Meduri GU. The ten reasons why corticosteroid therapy reduces mortality in severe COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(11):2067–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang ZG, Lei XL, Li XL. Early application of low-dose glucocorticoid improves acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(4):1215–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zayed Y, Barbarawi M, Ismail E, Samji V, Kerbage J, Rizk F, et al. Use of glucocorticoids in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. J Intensive Care. 2020;8:43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ni YN, Chen G, Sun J, Liang BM, Liang ZA. The effect of corticosteroids on mortality of patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lee N, Allen Chan KC, Hui DS, Ng EK, Wu A, Chiu RW, et al. Effects of early corticosteroid treatment on plasma SARS-associated Coronavirus RNA concentrations in adult patients. J Clin Virol. 2004;31(4):304–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dequin PF, Heming N, Meziani F, Plantefève G, Voiriot G, Badié J, et al. Effect of hydrocortisone on 21-day mortality or respiratory support among critically Ill patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(13):1298–306.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tomazini BM, Maia IS, Cavalcanti AB, Berwanger O, Rosa RG, Veiga VC, et al. Effect of dexamethasone on days alive and ventilator-free in patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID-19: the CoDEX randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(13):1307–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Angus DC, Derde L, Al-Beidh F, Annane D, Arabi Y, Beane A, et al. Effect of hydrocortisone on mortality and organ support in patients with severe COVID-19: the REMAP-CAP COVID-19 corticosteroid domain randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(13):1317–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sterne JAC, Murthy S, Diaz JV, Slutsky AS, Villar J, Angus DC, et al. Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically Ill patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020.

  28. 28.

    De Backer D, Azoulay E, Vincent JL. Corticosteroids in severe COVID-19: a critical view of the evidence. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gordon AC, Mouncey PR, Al-Beidh F, Rowan KM, Nichol AD, Arabi YM, et al. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically Ill patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021.

  30. 30.

    Group RC. Tocilizumab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1637–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rosas IO, Bräu N, Waters M, Go RC, Hunter BD, Bhagani S, et al. Tocilizumab in Hospitalized Patients with Severe Covid-19 Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2021.

  32. 32.

    Wang SY, Chang CH, Meizlish ML, Bahel P, Rinder HM, Lee AI, et al. Changes in inflammatory and immune drivers in response to immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.20248547. Preprint

  33. 33.

    Meduri GU, Annane D, Confalonieri M, Chrousos GP, Rochwerg B, Busby A, et al. Pharmacological principles guiding prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2284–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yang T, Li Z, Jiang L, Xi X. Corticosteroid use and intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chauvet P, Mallat J, Arumadura C, Vangrunderbeek N, Dupre C, Pauquet P, et al. Risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically Ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(11):e0244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Schauwvlieghe AFAD, Rijnders BJA, Philips N, Verwijs R, Vanderbeke L, Van Tienen C, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe influenza: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(10):782–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Amaya-Villar R, Garnacho-Montero J, García-Garmendía JL, Madrazo-Osuna J, Garnacho-Montero MC, Luque R, et al. Steroid-induced myopathy in patients intubated due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(1):157–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Delucchi K, Famous KR, Ware LB, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Calfee CS, et al. Stability of ARDS subphenotypes over time in two randomised controlled trials. Thorax. 2018;73(5):439–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Keller MJ, Kitsis EA, Arora S, Chen JT, Agarwal S, Ross MJ, et al. Effect of systemic glucocorticoids on mortality or mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19. J Hosp Med. 2020;15(8):489–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of invasive aspergillosis. [Internet]. 2019.

  41. 41.

    Koehler P, Bassetti M, Chakrabarti A, Chen SCA, Colombo AL, Hoenigl M, et al. Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 14; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30847-1. Online ahead of print.

  42. 42.

    Luyt CE, Forel JM, Hajage D, Jaber S, Cayot-Constantin S, Rimmelé T, et al. Acyclovir for mechanically ventilated patients with herpes simplex virus oropharyngeal reactivation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(2):263–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Saris A, Reijnders TD, Nossent EJ, Schuurman AR, Verhoeff J, Asten SV, et al. Distinct cellular immune profiles in the airways and blood of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thorax. 2021 Apr 12; doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216256. Online ahead of print.

  44. 44.

    Liao M, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wen Y, Xu G, Zhao J, et al. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):842–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hung IF, Lung KC, Tso EY, Liu R, Chung TW, Chu MY, et al. Triple combination of interferon beta-1b, lopinavir-ritonavir, and ribavirin in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1695–704.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, Michailidis E, Hoffmann HH, Zhang Y, et al. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370(6515).

  47. 47.

    Pan H, Peto R, Henao-Restrepo AM, Preziosi MP, Sathiyamoorthy V, Abdool Karim Q, et al. Repurposed antiviral drugs for Covid-19 - interim WHO solidarity trial results. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(6):497–511.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ruetsch C, Brglez V, Crémoni M, Zorzi K, Fernandez C, Boyer-Suavet S, et al. Functional exhaustion of Type I and II interferons production in severe COVID-19 patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:603961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Morris G, Bortolasci CC, Puri BK, Olive L, Marx W, O’Neil A, et al. The pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2: A suggested model and therapeutic approach. Life Sci. 2020;258:118166.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kyrmizi I, Gresnigt MS, Akoumianaki T, Samonis G, Sidiropoulos P, Boumpas D, et al. Corticosteroids block autophagy protein recruitment in Aspergillus fumigatus phagosomes via targeting dectin-1/Syk kinase signaling. J Immunol. 2013;191(3):1287–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to all sections. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marnix Kuindersma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuindersma, M., Diaz, R.R. & Spronk, P.E. Tailored modulation of the inflammatory balance in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU?—a viewpoint. Crit Care 25, 178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03607-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Coronavirus
  • Dexamethasone
  • Inflammation