Skip to main content

Non-intubated COVID-19 patients despite high levels of supplemental oxygen

Many COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure may require invasive mechanical ventilation [1]. However, deciding whether and when a patient should be intubated is complex, especially in COVID-19 patients who commonly exhibit severe hypoxemia without clinical signs of respiratory failure (the so-called silent hypoxemia) [2]. While clinical signs of respiratory failure seem to be universally acknowledged as intubation criteria [3], their precise definition is lacking. Some authors have consequently used definite thresholds to guide intubation [4], but this approach is debated [5] as an individualized strategy may be more adequate. In our ICU, only COVID-19 patients showing persistent signs of respiratory distress associated with profound hypoxemia were intubated.

We therefore aimed (1) to assess the proportion of our COVID-19 patients not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation despite high levels of supplemental oxygen (≥ 15L/min for ≥ 6 h) as well as (2) to describe their clinical and biological features on the day of worst clinical status.

We retrospectively analyzed data of COVID-19 patients (positive SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR) with acute respiratory failure admitted to our hospital between March 1st, 2020 and March 1st, 2021.

Patients were included if (1) they received 15 or more L/min of supplemental oxygen for ≥ 6 h while being hospitalized either in the wards or in ICU and if (2) they did not undergo tracheal intubation except for hypoxic cardiac arrest occurring while breathing spontaneously. Patients with a “do-not-intubate” order or still hospitalized were excluded.

Baseline was defined as the day patients met the inclusion criteria. The day of worst clinical status was defined as the day they received the highest oxygen flow with the highest respiratory rate (RR).

Among 161 patients without a “do-not-intubate” order, 49 (30%, 95% confidence interval 23–38%) did not receive invasive mechanical ventilation (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics and description of the patients on the day of worst clinical status (number of days after hospital admission: 3 [4–6]) are detailed in Table 1. On the day of worst clinical status, the proportion of patients treated with non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula and standard oxygen therapy was 8, 39 and 61%, respectively. The highest RR was 36 [28–40]/min while lowest SpO2 and PaO2 were 91 [90–92] % and 65 [54–73] mmHg, respectively. Fifteen patients (31%) had a RR ≥ 40/min. Median PaCO2 was 37 [34–42] mmHg and lactate was 1.7 [1.3–1.9] mmol/L.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart

Table 1 Characteristics at baseline and on the day of worst clinical status of 49 non-intubated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure hospitalized in the ICU (n = 22) or in the wards (n = 27)

On the day of worst clinical status, only 22 (45%) were hospitalized in ICU (Fig. 1). One of them presented hypoxic cardiac arrest while switching from high-flow nasal cannula to noninvasive ventilation.

Among the 27 (55%) patients managed in the wards, one (4%) was treated with high-flow nasal cannula while 26 (96%) were treated with standard oxygen therapy alone, with a highest oxygen flow of 15 [15–15] L/min, a highest RR of 32 [28–37]/min and a lowest SpO2 of 91 [91–94]%.

We herein report that 30% of our patients receiving ≥ 15L/min oxygen flow did not receive invasive mechanical ventilation despite significant tachypnea. Noteworthy, more than half of them were managed outside the ICU without hypoxic cardiac arrest, which could be of interest in a context of a massive inflow of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Despite one hypoxic cardiac arrest (occurring in a patient cared for in the ICU), avoiding intubation might be feasible in some patients with high levels of supplemental oxygen and significant tachypnea. Rather than predefined SpO2 or RR thresholds, clinical acumen appears of paramount importance when deciding to initiate invasive mechanical ventilation.

Our results cannot be generalized to other centers nor to any other respiratory diseases than COVID-19. However, this study strengthens the idea that managing non-intubated patients with respiratory failure is a “clinical art” and that individualized patient care is necessary [6].

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and analyzed for the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

SAPS II:

Simplified acute physiology score

ICU:

Intensive care unit

References

  1. 1.

    COVID-ICU Group on behalf of the REVA Network and the COVID-ICU Investigators. Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:60–73.

  2. 2.

    Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Why COVID-19 silent hypoxemia is baffling to physicians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:356–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Azoulay E, de Waele J, Ferrer R, Staudinger T, Borkowska M, Povoa P, et al. International variation in the management of severe COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020;24:486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Oranger M, Gonzalez-Bermejo J, Dacosta-Noble P, Llontop C, Guerder A, Trosini-Desert V, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure to avoid intubation in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a two-period retrospective case-control study. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:2001692.

  5. 5.

    Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Caution about early intubation and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F. Noninvasive strategies in COVID-19: epistemology, randomised trials, guidelines, physiology. Eur Respir J. 2021;57:2004247.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We warmly acknowledge Dr Elsa Logre, Dr Olivier Pajot, Dr Jo-Anna Tirolien, Dr Olivia Picq, Dr Florence Sarfati, Dr Paul Desaint, and all the residents who took care of the patients as well as Dr Clara Finck for her writing assistance.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SC, GP, RC and DC are responsible for the conception and design. All the authors took care of the patients. SC is responsible for data acquisition. All the authors were responsible for analysis and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien Contou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable for a retrospective monocenter observational study. This non-interventional data-based research used the care data collected during patient hospital stay. There is no processing of indirectly identifiable data. Patients and proxies were informed, and written consent was waived.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chosidow, S., Plantefève, G., Fraissé, M. et al. Non-intubated COVID-19 patients despite high levels of supplemental oxygen. Crit Care 25, 170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03599-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • COVID-19
  • ICU
  • ARDS
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Tracheal intubation
  • Acute respiratory failure
  • ICU