Skip to main content

Treatment of influenza virus-related critical illness during continuous renal replacement therapy: take caution with dosing

The Original Article was published on 12 June 2019

In their discussion, Chow et al. state that for patients who cannot tolerate or absorb enteric oseltamivir due to gastric stasis, malabsorption, or other gastrointestinal processes, intravenous peramivir may be an alternative [1]. They advise a single dose of 600 mg via intravenous infusion, given over 15–30 min [1]. The question that arises is the following: what is the dose to be given during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)? According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, the dose should be adjusted in line with the degree of reduction in creatinine clearance [2]. In a recent case report by Dillon et al., a dose of 200 mg daily, the recommended dose for patients with creatinine clearance of 30–49 mL/min, was given to a patient with acute kidney injury (AKI) managed with CRRT [2]. In practice, as the plasma protein unbound fraction approaches 1 (as is the case with peramivir) and the molecular weight of the drug is low (below 20,000 Da), the sieving coefficient can be estimated to be 1 [3]. As a consequence, in this case report, the dosage scheme (200 mg daily) achieved a smaller serum peak concentration, larger volume of distribution, and a shorter half-life, illustrating the significant differences in pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment when drugs are administered in the setting of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) [2]. Scheetz et al. recommend a steady-state concentration of 17,078 ng/mL, which was averaged from peak and trough concentrations in adult patients with normal renal function [4]. Based on this recommendation, the patient reported by Dillon et al. would have required more than 800 mg given the CRRT settings [2, 4]. Doses of peramivir during CRRT vary from 200 to 800 mg per day in various case reports. This huge difference in dose will have a dramatic influence upon PK/PD during CRRT. Peramivir does not seem to possess any of the classic indications for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) (i.e., narrow therapeutic index, high interpatient variability, high intrapatient variability) in patients with normal organ function [5]. However, in patients with critical illness requiring extracorporeal therapies, TDM may provide useful information regarding pharmacokinetic variations and pharmacodynamic target attainment in order to avoid severe underdosing and treatment failure [5].

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Acute kidney injury


Continuous renal replacement therapy


Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration






Therapeutic drug monitoring


  1. Chow EJ, Doyle JD, Uyeki TM. Influenza virus-related critical illness: prevention, diagnosis, treatment. Crit Care. 2019;23:214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dillon RC, Witcher R, Cies JJ, Moore WS 2nd, Chopra A. Pharmacokinetics of peramivir in an adolescent patient receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017;22(1):60–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohler J, Donauer J, Keller F. Pharmacokinetic principles during continuous renal replacement therapy: drugs and dosage. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999;72:S24–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scheetz MH, Griffith MM, Ghossein C, et al. Pharmacokinetic assessment of peramivir in a hospitalized adult undergoing continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(12):e64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Winter ME. Basic clinical pharmacokinetics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 61–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references





Author information

Authors and Affiliations



PMH, SR, and DDB designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting and reviewing. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick M. Honore.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honore, P.M., Kugener, L., Redant, S. et al. Treatment of influenza virus-related critical illness during continuous renal replacement therapy: take caution with dosing. Crit Care 24, 72 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: