International survey on influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) in intensive care units: responses suggest low awareness and potential underdiagnosis outside Europe

Dear Editor,

Historically, fungal infections have not been considered an important influenza complication. In 2018, a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Belgium and the Netherlands identified aspergillosis in 19% of patients with severe influenza. As influenza seemed independently associated with IPA, the term influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) was introduced [1, 2]. In contrast, a single-center retrospective Canadian study reported an incidence of 7.2% [3]. Incidence seemingly varies between geographical regions and centers, but awareness among physicians may also vary. Diagnosis of IAPA is still challenging. Since culture has low sensitivity, non-culture-based diagnostic methods like galactomannan (GM) should be used [4].

As no data exist on IAPA awareness in different parts of the world, nor on differences in clinical use of GM in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) or serum in critically ill influenza patients, we designed a simple survey (Table 1) and invited 20,093 members of the ELSO, SCCM, and ESICM to participate. A total of 565 responses were received, of which 90% from critical care physicians. Notably, 40% respondents were based in the US, 37% in Europe, and 22% in other continents (Fig. 1a).

Table 1 Overview of respondent’s input based on the survey

Fig. 1

Number of respondents and their geographical location and web diagram representing the mean response for Europe, United States and other countries. a^aAustria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom; ^bArgentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Georgia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Moldova, Pakistan, Palestine, Philippines, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates b Mean responses were calculated based on histograms. Subdivisions represent 0.5 arbitrary units for each of the correlation variables. For the GM BAL, GM serum and lower respiratory sampling variables, we used following units: 1 combining the categories ‘never’ and ‘rarely’; 2: sometimes; and 3 combining the categories ‘very often’ and ‘always’

The majority (72%, n = 404) of respondents reported up to 30 severe influenza cases per season. Globally, 63% (n = 347) of respondents had never heard of or seen IAPA in the past 5 years. In contrast to the US (17%, n = 37) and other countries (39%, n = 50), a majority of European participants (58%, n = 119) was familiar with IAPA.

Less than half of respondents (39%, n = 217) indicated frequent sampling of lower respiratory specimens, whereas 26% (n = 145) rarely or never performed sampling. We observed differences across different countries: European respondents performed lower respiratory sampling very often or always (58%, n = 119). This was more than the respondents in the US (24%, n = 53; p < 0.001) or those in other countries (33%, n = 45; p < 0.001).

While 39% of respondents did take lower respiratory samples, the majority of respondents (79%, n = 434) seldom determined GM in BAL. In general, GM determination in BAL/serum was more frequently reported by respondents in Europe than in the US (p < 0.01) or other countries (p < 0.01). Interestingly, both GM determination in BAL and serum correlated with the reported number of IAPA cases in all regions. Based on the calculated mean of response histograms, a web diagram was constructed, showing that a higher number of observed IAPA cases were associated with more intensive sampling (Fig. 1b).

Our results show that differences exist in awareness and diagnostic practices related to IAPA among surveyed ICU clinicians in Europe, the US, and other countries. Moreover, many clinicians were unaware of the association between influenza and aspergillosis, with European respondents having seen or heard more frequently of IAPA cases than those in the US and other countries. Although the observed differences in IAPA cases could be explained by true variation in IAPA prevalence (e.g., due to differences in environmental/genetic factors, influenza vaccination coverage, use of antiviral therapy or steroids [5, 6]), the condition might be underdiagnosed outside Europe, which is supported by lower use of GM testing on BAL or serum. Of course, these findings might not necessarily be generalizable due to the low response rate (3%). Actually, the questions were deliberately kept simple and straightforward to increase the response rate. Anyway, greater awareness of IAPA is needed as are rapid diagnostic tests. Based on the conclusions of this survey, it is clear that more multicentric prospective studies are needed to assess the incidence and risk factors for IAPA in different parts of the world, thereby taking the most updated guidelines on diagnostic and sampling practices into account, as well as the use of steroids and the consensus definitions regarding fungal infection versus colonization.