- Research Letter
- Open Access
Transfer of skills for difficult intubation after videolaryngoscopy training: a randomized simulation study
Critical Care volume 24, Article number: 252 (2020)
Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly being used in intensive care units (ICUs) and may increase the chance of first-pass success when intubation is difficult [1,2,3]. However, VL equipment may not always be available and direct laryngoscopy (DL) would then be required. While previous simulation studies demonstrated comparable retention of skills for DL versus VL in normal manikins [4, 5], it is unknown if VL training among physician trainees would lead to ineffective DL use for difficult intubation scenarios. We therefore aim to show if training using VL would lead to effective transfer of skills for difficult intubation using DL.
Ethical approval was sought from the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB 2015/00937). Internal medicine (IM) residents who had little prior exposure to DL or VL were recruited and randomized into either DL (size 3 Macintosh blade) or VL (C-MAC®) training, using a normal airway manikin (Cormack-Lehane Grade I). For both groups, the intubation method and instructor remained the same. Residents were then assessed by two blinded assessors, using DL on a difficult airway manikin (Cormack-Lehane Grade III). The primary outcome was intubation time during the first attempt (after passing the laryngoscope between the lips), averaged between the two assessors. Intubation time was truncated at 120 s, beyond which the attempt was considered failed. The secondary outcome measures were first pass success rate and rate of complications from ETI (such as teeth damage and endobronchial intubation).
Forty-one residents were randomized (21 DL, 20 VL) (Table 1). The median intubation time taken for the DL and VL groups to intubate were 42.5 s (range 21–120 s) and 41.5 s (range 13–120 s), respectively, p = 0.273 (Table 2). Successful intubation on first attempt was recorded in 17 and 18 residents in the DL and VL group, respectively, p = 0.542. Between the DL and VL groups, complication rates were not significantly different: teeth damage (5 DL, 4 VL); endobronchial intubation (1 DL, 2 VL). With regards to inter-tester variability, the correlation between 1st and 2nd assessors for participants’ median time for intubation during the first attempt was excellent (Spearman’s rho = 0.992, p < 0.001).
In conclusion, training with VL, compared to DL, had similar transfer of skills for difficult intubation using DL. As our randomized trial was done under simulation conditions, further study within an authentic clinical environment would be needed to confirm our preliminary results.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due as the local approval authority does not permit data sets to be placed publicly but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Hoshijima H, Denawa Y, Tominaga A, Nakamura C, Shiga T, Nagasaka H. Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2017;44:69–75.
Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011136.
Hypes CD, Stolz U, Sakles JC, Joshi RR, Natt B, Malo J, Bloom JW, Mosier JM. Video laryngoscopy improves odds of first-attempt success at intubation in the intensive care unit. A propensity-matched analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(3):382–90.
Hunter I, Ramanathan V, Balasubramanian P, Evans DA, Hardman JG, McCahon RA. Retention of laryngoscopy skills in medical students: a randomised, cross-over study of the Macintosh, A.P. Advance() , C-MAC((R)) and Airtraq((R)) laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(10):1191–7.
Assaad MA, Lachance C, Moussa A. Learning neonatal intubation using the Videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial on mannequins. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(3):190–3.
The authors have not received funding for this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We obtained ethics approval from National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB 2015/00937) and obtained a waiver of consent.
Consent for publication
The authors do not report any competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kee, A., Ko, R., Capistrano, R. et al. Transfer of skills for difficult intubation after videolaryngoscopy training: a randomized simulation study. Crit Care 24, 252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02982-8
- Intubation skill