Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Iron deficiency diagnosed using hepcidin on critical care discharge is an independent risk factor for death and poor quality of life at one year: an observational prospective study on 1161 patients

Critical Care201822:314

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2253-0

  • Received: 16 August 2018
  • Accepted: 1 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Iron deficiency is difficult to diagnose in critically ill patients, but may be frequent and may impair recovery. Measurement of hepcidin could help in the diagnosis of iron deficiency. We aim to assess if iron deficiency diagnosed using hepcidin is associated with poorer outcome one year after an intensive care unit stay.

Methods

We used the prospective FROG-ICU, multicentre (n = 28 ICUs), observational cohort study of critically ill survivors followed up one year after intensive care unit discharge. Iron deficiency was defined as hepcidin < 20 ng/l, ferritin < 100 ng/l or soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR)/log(ferritin) > 0.8, measured in blood drawn at intensive care unit discharge. Main outcomes were one-year all-cause mortality and poor quality of life (defined as a Short Form 36 (SF-36) score below the median).

Results

Among the 2087 patients in the FROG-ICU cohort, 1570 were discharged alive and 1161 had a blood sample available at intensive care unit discharge and were included in the analysis. Using hepcidin, 429 (37%) patients had iron deficiency, compared to 72 (6%) using ferritin alone and 151 (13%) using the sTfR/log(ferritin) ratio. Iron deficiency diagnosed according to low hepcidin was an independent predictor of one-year mortality (OR 1.51 (1.10–2.08)) as was high sTfR/log ferritin ratio (OR = 1.95 (1.27–3.00)), but low ferritin was not. Severe ID, defined as hepcidin < 10 ng/l, was also an independent predictor of poor one-year physical recovery (1.58 (1.01–2.49)).

Conclusions

Iron deficiency, diagnosed using hepcidin, is very frequent at intensive care unit discharge and is associated with increased one-year mortality and poorer physical recovery. Whether iron treatment may improve these outcomes remains to be investigated.

Keywords

  • Iron deficiency
  • Outcome
  • Critically ill
  • Quality of life
  • Hepcidin

Background

Iron deficiency (ID) is one of the main causes of chronic disease. ID affected more than 10% of the world’s population in 2015 and is responsible for almost half of all anaemia worldwide, which is the first cause of health impairment [1]. ID anaemia is indeed one of the leading causes of years of living with disability [1, 2]. However, ID is not only responsible for anaemia, it also causes fatigue and muscle weakness, independently of anaemia [3]. This has been notably described in patients with heart failure, for whom ID is associated with impaired cardiac function and increased mortality [4, 5]. ID may also be important in the prognosis of critically ill patients. First ID is frequent on admission in intensive care units (ICU), affecting 20–40% of the patients [68]. ID on admission has been associated with longer ICU stay, more renal failure or ICU-acquired infections [6, 8]. Because critically ill patients are exposed to frequent blood sampling and other causes of blood loss (including surgery, extracorporeal circuit, invasive procedures, etc.) [9, 10], they are exposed to high iron losses. Daily blood loss in these patients can be as high as 128 ml of blood per day [10], which represents 2–3 times the daily need for erythropoiesis [11]. ID is thus expected to be frequent on ICU discharge and may impair the post-ICU rehabilitation. Unfortunately, ID is difficult to diagnose using conventional markers (i.e. ferritin) in the presence of inflammation. Prevalence of ID on discharge is thus probably underestimated, with observed prevalence of less than 10% [12]. Many markers have been proposed to diagnose ID in the presence of inflammation [68, 13]. However, there is no consensus and the best markers (i.e. the percentage of hypochromic red cells) [14] are not usable in case of blood transfusion, which is very frequent in critically ill patients. Thus, the remaining proposed marker in this context is the ratio between soluble transferrin receptor and the log (ferritin) (sTfR/log ferritin) [15].

In recent decades, the understanding of iron metabolism has been greatly improved by the discovery of its master regulator, hepcidin [16]. A low hepcidin level may indicate ID in the critically ill patient [11, 17]. Because hepcidin may indicate ID and because ID is responsible for muscular weakness and fatigue, we hypothesised that ID diagnosed according to low plasma hepcidin or high sTfR/log(ferritin) on ICU discharge could predict a poorer outcome and quality of life (QOL) in critically ill patients. We used the prospective Frog-ICU cohort [18, 19] to determine whether ID diagnosis using these markers, measured at ICU discharge, were predictive of one-year mortality and QOL in critically ill patients discharged alive from ICU.

Methods

We used data from the prospective observational cohort of the French and euRopean Outcome reGistry in Intensive Care Units (FROG-ICU). Briefly, this prospective study has been designed to better understand long-term outcome after ICU discharge and risk factors for morbidity and mortality [19]. Plasma was collected on ICU discharge and patients were followed for one year, with quality of life (QOL) assessment using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Patients from 28 ICUs (and 19 hospitals in France and Belgium) were included if they were ventilated for more than 24 h or if they received catecholamine for more than 24 h. Patients were followed up on ICU discharge and at 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge [18]. The Ethical Committees waived the need for written consent; all patients and/or next of kin were informed and oral consent was documented in the patients’ medical records by the investigator. We followed the “Strengthening of reporting in observational studies in epidemiology” (STROBE) statement to report the results.

Hepcidin measurement

Using a previously validated and published mass-spectrometry protocol [20], hepcidin concentration was measured in the blood sample obtained at ICU discharge. Briefly, after plasma pre-treatment by solid phase extraction, hepcidin was quantified using ultra high-pressure chromatography coupled to triple quadripole (Acquity UPLC-Xevo TQMS, Waters Guyancourt, France). Using this method, normal ranges for hepcidin concentration are between 1 and 20 ng/l. However, < 20 ng/l hepcidin concentration indicates ID in critically ill patients, as it corresponds to the threshold value determined using ELISA [17].

Iron profile

An iron profile was determined in all patients, by measuring serum ferritin and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) using a Vista analyzer and NLatex sTfR, BNPprospec (Siemens, France). Iron deficiency was defined according to the usual definition in the presence of inflammation, by either ferritin < 100 ng/l or sTfR/log(ferritin) ratio > 0.8 [14, 15].

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as median with interquartile range or count with percentage. Marginal associations were tested using the chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. The primary endpoint was to assess whether low hepcidin (i.e. hepcidin < 20 ng/l, corresponding to ID in the critically ill) predicts poorer outcome, defined as ICU discharge. To account for possible cofounders, we used logistic regression and adjusted this analysis according to the principal factors associated with one-year mortality in the Frog-ICU cohort (see [18] for complete description of multivariate analysis): age, gender, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, surgical/medical, septic shock and haemoglobin (Hb) at discharge. We also evaluated the predictive values of the other biological markers of ID, using the standard definitions (i.e. ferritin < 100 ng/l and sTfR/log(ferritin) > 0.8). Odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) at 95% was calculated as a measure of association. The log linearity of the quantitative variables was evaluated using restricted cubic splines.

A secondary aim was to evaluate if low hepcidin (i.e. presence of iron deficiency) predicts one-year QOL of these patients. For this purpose, we defined poorer QOL as a SF-36 score lower than the median observed SF-36 scores in our critically ill population, for the two dimensions (i.e. physical and mental). In order to complete our results, we conducted sensitivity analysis, using a lower threshold for ID (severe ID, defined as Hepcidin < 10 ng/l).

Because the diagnosis of ID may be modified in the presence of inflammation, we modelled the probability of one-year mortality according to the ID markers (i.e. hepcidin and sTfR/log(ferritin)) and the level of inflammation, by separating the population according to the different tertiles of interleukin-6 levels at discharge. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software version 3.1.1 or above (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Between August 2011 and June 2013, 2087 patients were included in the FROG-ICU cohort, among them 1570 were discharged alive from the ICU and 1161 had a blood sample available together with one-year follow-up and were thus included in this study (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Study flow chart. ICU, intensive care unit; pts, patients

ID diagnosis

Hepcidin measurements were available for 1161 patients, ferritin for 1157 patients and sTfR/ferritin for 1146 patients. According to their hepcidin concentrations, 429 patients (37%) had ID (i.e. hepcidin < 20 ng/l) at ICU discharge. Based on ferritin, only 72 (6%) patients could be considered as having ID (i.e. ferritin < 100 ng/l). Based on the sTfR/log(ferritin) ratio, 151 (13%) patients had ID (i.e. sTfR/log(ferritin) > 0.8). Interestingly the concordance on ID diagnosis between hepcidin and ferritin was not so low (67%, 95% CI 65–70%) but was better with sTfR/(log ferritin) (71%, 95% CI 68–73%, Fig. 2). However, hepcidin identified more patients with ID (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Relationship between hepcidin and ferritin (a) or soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR)/log(ferritin) (b). We identified positive correlation between log(hepcidin) and ferritin (a) (Pearson’s correlation coefficient [95% CI], 0.59 [0.55–0.62]) and negative correlation with sTfR/log(ferritin) (b). The concordance for iron deficiency (ID) diagnosis according to hepcidin and ferritin (a) was 67%, 95% CI 65–70% (i.e. the proportion of patients with hepcidin < 20 ng/l and ferritin < 100 ng/l or hepcidin > 20 ng/l and ferritin > 100 ng/l) and for sTfR/log(ferritin) (b) it was 71%, 95% CI 68–73%. Grey areas indicate the concordance between the different markers. Lower right (a) and left (b) panels indicate ID according to hepcidin that was not diagnosed according to ferritin (a) or sTfR/log(ferritin) (b). CRP, C-reactive protein

In our study population, hepcidin values were not correlated to Hb values, but there was positive correlation with CRP (and IL-6) and ferritin, and negative correlation with sTfR (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Patients with ID identified by hepcidin on (i.e. hepcidin < 20 ng/l) were more often women, had more liver disease and lower Hb at discharge, but their renal function was better than patients without ID. Patients with ID at ICU discharge had received fewer transfusion during their ICU stay (Table 1).
Table 1

Patients characteristics according to the diagnosis of ID (i.e. hepcidin < 20 ng/l)

 

Non-ID (n = 732) (hepcidin ≥ 20 ng/l)

ID (n = 429) (hepcidin < 20 ng/l)

p

Age (years)

61 (50 to 72)

59 (47 to 72)

0.25

Women

240 (32.8)

183 (42.7)

0.00081

Charlson’s score

3 (1 to 4)

3 (1 to 4)

0.32

Diabetes mellitus

112 (15.3)

89 (20.7)

0.02

Chronic heart failure

41 (5.6)

34 (7.9)

0.14

Hypertension

268 (36.6)

185 (43.1)

0.029

Liver disease

31 (4.2)

44 (10.3)

< 0.001

Cancer

98 (13.4)

43 (10)

0.094

ICU admission

 SAPS II

46 (34.5 to 59)

46 (34 to 59)

0.87

 SOFA

6 (4 to 9)

6 (4 to 9)

0.71

 Septic shock

172 (23.5)

78 (18.2)

0.038

 eGFR (ml/min)

82 (40.4 to 106)

87.9 (56.2 to 109)

0.0044

 Hb (g/dl)

10.2 (9 to 11.6)

9.9 (9.1 to 11.1)

0.032

ICU stay

 ICU LOS (days)

13 (7 to 22)

12 (7 to 20)

0.19

 Renal support n (%)

140 (19.1)

64 (14.9)

0.079

 Catecholamine n (%)

547 (74.7)

294 (68.5)

0.025

 Transfusion n (%)

343 (46.9)

162 (37.8)

0.0027

ICU discharge

 Hb (g/dl)

10.1 (9 to 11.3)

9.8 (8.9 to 10.8)

0.011

CRP (mg/l)

69.4 (32.2 to 117.3)

33 (13.9 to 66.7)

< 0.001

Ferritin (μg/l)

543.5 (339.8 to 932.2)

240 (138 to 366)

< 0.001

sTfR (mg/l)

1 (0.8 to 1.4)

1.4 (1 to 1.9)

< 0.001

sTfR/log ferritin

0.37 (0.28 to 0.51)

0.57 (0.43 to 0.85)

< 0.001

IL-6 (ng/l)

37.1 (19.6 to 70)

19.8 (9.4 to 38.4)

< 0.001

Outcome at one year

- global score

56.9 (35.9 to 76.6)

53.6 (34.3 to 73.7)

0.21

- Mental QOL (MCS)

58.8 (36.9 to 77.9)

57.9 (35.9 to 77)

0.44

- Physical QOL (PCS)

54.7 (33.6 to 78.8)

50 (31.2 to 72.7)

0.11

One-year mortality

123 (16.8)

99 (23.1)

0.011

Data are expressed as median (Q1–Q3) or number (percentage)

ID iron deficiency, ICU intensive care unit, SAPS II Simplified Acute Physiology Score, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, Hb haemoglobin, LOS length of stay, CRP C-reactive protein, sTfR soluble transferrin receptor, IL-6 interleukin 6, QOL quality of life

ID and outcome

ID diagnosed by hepcidin was associated with one-year mortality (Table 1). ID diagnosed by sTfR/log(ferritin) ratio > 0.8, was also associated with higher mortality (17.7% vs 27.8%, p = 0.003), but ID defined by low ferritin (i.e. < 100 ng/l) was not (18.1% compared to 19.2% mortality, respectively, in patients with “low” and “high” ferritin, p = 0.93).

The multivariate analysis adjusted for the main confounding factors confirmed that ID diagnosed by hepcidin is an independent predictor of one-year mortality as well as high sTfR/log ferritin ratio (Table 2 and Fig. 3). All the odds ratios from the multivariate analysis for the different definitions of ID are reported in Additional file 2: Table S1. Figure 4 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with and without ID, showing higher mortality in those with ID (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.41 (1.10–1.89), p = 0.01). These associations persisted when patients were separated according to their levels of inflammation (according to IL-6) (Additional file 3: Figure S2). The shape of the observed curves could indicate that a different threshold may be appropriate in the presence of inflammation (i.e. around 40–50 ng/ml for hepdicin) or in low inflammation (i.e. > 0.6 for the sTfR/log(ferritin) ratio (see Additional file 3: Figure S2)). In addition, severe ID defined as hepcidin < 10 ng/l was also independently associated with a poor physical QOL at one year, while the other ID markers were not (Fig. 3).
Table 2

Result of the multivariate model for the prediction of one-year post-ICU mortality

 

OR [95% CI]

P value

Female gender

0.78 [0.56; 1.09]

0.14

Septic shock

1.27 [0.89; 1.81]

0.18

Diabetes mellitus

1.50 [1.04; 2.16]

0.03

Age (per year)

1.05 [1.04; 1.06]

< 0.001

ID (hepcidin < 20 ng/l)

1.51 [1.10; 2.08]

0.01

Chronic liver disease

2.51 [1.45; 4.33]

< 0.001

All the variables retained in the final model of the princeps publication were added to this model [18]

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, ID iron deficiency

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Odd ratio for one-year mortality and poor physical quality of life according to the different markers of iron deficiency. Squares indicate crude odd ratios and open circles indicate adjusted OR for main cofounding factors (age, gender, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, surgical/medical admission, septic shock and haemoglobin at discharge ). Poor physical recovery was defined as a physical component of the Short Form 36 score below the median value (i.e. 53) at one year. The SF-36 was available in 466 patients at one year. OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval, sTfR, soluble transferrin receptor

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

One-year survival distribution. Survival curves in patients with iron deficiency (ID) (dark line) and patients without ID (non-ID) (dotted line), according to hepcidin < or ≥ 20 ng/l at discharge) are shown from ICU discharge to day 360. Survival was longer in patients without ID (hazard ratio = 1.41 [1.10–1.89], p = 0.01)

Discussion

In this prospective cohort of critically ill patients we observed that ID diagnosed by low hepcidin or high sTfR/log ferritin ratio is frequent at ICU discharge, affecting almost 40% of the patients and that ID is an independent predictor of one-year mortality. In addition, severe ID defined by hepcidin < 10 ng/l was also an independent predictor of one-year poor physical QOL.

This relatively high prevalence of ID is consistent with the prevalence observed in the general population (around 30–40% in menstruating women or preschool children) [21, 22] or in populations of patients such as those in the perioperative period (prevalence between 35 and 70%) [23] or patients with cardiac disease (prevalence around 40–50%) [24]. However, there are very few data available in critically ill patients, especially at ICU discharge. On admission to ICU, the prevalence of ID varies from 9% to almost 40% [6, 8, 17, 2527]. These variations in ID prevalence are mainly related to the biological test that is used to diagnose ID. In the general population, ferritin is the gold standard for ID diagnosis [22]. However, ferritin synthesis is induced by inflammation, decreasing its interest as a diagnostic tool of ID in such conditions. Inflammation is present in virtually all critically ill patients and this probably explains why the prevalence of ID, diagnosed by low ferritin (i.e. ferritin < 100 μg/l) is < 10% on admission to ICU [27] or at discharge [12]. This is why other markers are proposed to diagnose ID in the presence of inflammation. Red blood cell indices, such as the percentage of hypochromic red cells or reticulocyte haemoglobin content are considered to be the best variables available to diagnose ID in the presence of inflammation [14]. Unfortunately, these parameters cannot be used to diagnose ID when patients receive blood transfusions, which is often the case in critically patients. sTfR and its ratio to log(ferritin) has been proposed to diagnose ID in the presence of inflammation [14, 15]. In this cohort, ID defined by a low sTfR/log(ferritin) ratio makes it possible to diagnose ID in an important number of critically ill patients discharged from ICU and these patients had a poor outcome. However, this assay has some limitations, it is quite expensive and is not standardized [14]. The reproducibility of measures remains uncertain. Hepcidin quantification appears promising and a number of laboratories are collaborating towards global harmonization of hepcidin assays [28]. The prevalence of ID identified by hepcidin that we observed in this cohort is consistent with the expected; as the prevalence of ID on admission is around 30–40%, the prevalence of ID on discharge is expected to be the same or higher due to frequent blood loss (even if ID on admission may be also associated with higher mortality). Because hepcidin is higher in patients who have received blood transfusions [29] and because around 40% of the patients have been transfused, it is possible that more patients had ID. In addition, hepcidin synthesis is linked to the iron stores and to the level of inflammation [11, 29, 30]. Hepcidin could also be useful to indicate when iron treatment could be necessary, in fact elevated hepcidin prevents the mobilization of iron from stores, by blocking the ferroportin, whereas low hepcidin allows the expression of ferroportin at the cell membrane of macrophages and thus the export of iron from stores [11, 30].

In this cohort, we observed that severe ID is associated with both increased one-year mortality and poorer physical QOL. This is also consistent with observations that ID is a risk factor for mortality and morbidity in patients with cardiac disease [4]. Indeed, ID has been shown to be responsible for decreased mitochondrial complex I activity, decreased exercise capacity and left ventricular ejection fraction in an animal model [31]. ID has been also associated with decreased muscular function (skeletal and myocardial) and this may explain the usual association reported between ID and fatigue [3, 12, 32].

Our study has some limitations. We used different definitions of ID, but we could also have used other markers such as erythrocyte zinc protoporphyrin [7, 25]. However, this marker may be influenced by blood transfusion and may not be suitable in these patients (at least at the end of their stay, with a transfusion rate around 40%). We observed an association between low hepcidin and liver disease, but we do not have enough data to further investigate this association. Although the association between ID and poor outcomes is supported by a physiological rationale, our data do not demonstrate that iron treatment is beneficial in these critically ill patients. Furthermore, we do not have blood samples after ICU discharge to determine whether some patients did recover from ID or not and if ID at 3, 6 or 12 months is still associated with poor outcomes. We also do not know if some of these patients have been treated with iron after ICU discharge, but this is not likely since iron is rarely proposed in these patients. We also could have investigated the link between high hepcidin and the outcomes. Indeed, we observed that high hepcidin was also associated with higher mortality (as shown in Additonal file 3: Figure S2 for the highest tertile), and some authors report that high hepcidin (on admission) is associated with blood transfusion for example [29]. But, although ID is treatable using iron, high hepcidin is not (because anti-hepcidin antibodies are not available yet). It is thus more indicative of more severe inflammation [29].

Interestingly, treatment of ID using intravenous iron has been proven to improve symptoms of fatigue, physical and mental QOL and even cardiac function [33, 34]. To date, iron treatment is not recommended for critically ill patients. However, we have already demonstrated in an animal model of critical care anemia with ID, that iron may be used to treat anemia, without toxicity (neither oxidative stress induction nor increased risk of infection) [35]. Some human data are promising. Intravenous iron does not induce more oxidative stress in critically ill patients compared to healthy volunteers [36], and it has been shown to improve haemoglobin level at hospital discharge [37]. The results of a prospective randomized controlled study (i.e. Hepcidan study, NCT02276690) [38] designed to assess whether diagnosing ID using this mass spectrometry hepcidin measurement on ICU discharge could improve the post-ICU rehabilitation of critically ill patients are expected soon and could help clinicians decide how to diagnose ID in the critically ill and whether iron treatment is useful.

Conclusions

Iron deficiency, diagnosed using hepcidin concentration (< 20 ng/l) or sTfR/log(ferritin) ratio (> 0.8) at ICU discharge, is associated with increased one-year mortality. Severe ID (hepcidin < 10 ng/ml) is also an independent predictor of poor physical QOL at one year.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Hb: 

Haemoglobin

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

ID: 

Iron deficiency

IL : 

Interleukin

OR: 

Odds ratio

QOL: 

Quality of life

SF-36: 

Short Form 36

sTfR: 

Soluble transferrin receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study is based on the FROG-ICU cohort, for which all the FROG-ICU investigators recruited the patients. We thank them very much for this work.

FROG-ICU study group:

Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France: N Deye, C Fauvaux, A Mebazaa, C Damoisel, D Payen.

Hopital Saint Louis, Paris, France: E Azoulay, AS Moreau, L Jacob, O Marie.

Hopital Bichat, Paris, France: M Wolf, R Sonneville, R Bronchard.

Hopital Beaujon, Paris, France: I Rennuit, C Paugam.

Hopital, Cochin, Paris, France: JP Mira, A Cariou, A Tesnieres.

Hopital Bicetre, Paris, France: N Dufour, N Anguel, L Guerin, J Duranteau, C Ract.

CHU de Marseille, Marseille, France: M Leone, B Pastene.

Hopital Raymond Poincarré, Garches, France: T Sharshar, A Fayssoyl.

Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France: J-L Baudel, B Guidet.

Hopital Pitié salpétrière, Paris, France: Q Lu, W Jie Gu, N Brechot, A Combes.

CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France: S Jaber, A Pradel, Y Coisel, M Conseil.

Hopital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne Billancourt, France: A Veillard Baron, L Bodson.

CHU Caremeau, Nimes, France: Jy Lefrant, L Elotmani, A Ayral, S Lloret.

Hopital Hopital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France: S Pily-Flouri, Jb Pretalli.

Clinique Saint Luc, Louvain, Belgique: Pf Laterre, V Montiel, Mf Dujardin, C Berghe.

Funding

PHRC (AON 10–216) from the French ministry of health and Société Française d’Anesthésie—Réanimation. The Laboratory of excellence, GR-Ex, Paris, France supported this study. The labex GR-Ex, reference ANR-11-LABX-0051 is funded by the programme “Investissements d’avenir” of the French National Research Agency, reference ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02. The funders of the study had no role in the study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; writing of the report; or decision to submit for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The corresponding author (SL), AM and EG had full access to all the study data. SL takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Authors’ contributions

SL, AM and EG designed the study. TL and HP performed the hepcidin dosage. AM and EG designed and conducted the FROG-ICU study and recruited the patients. EG did the statistical analysis and prepared the figures. SL, TL, CM, HP, AM and EG did the data analysis. SL wrote the first and final draft of the manuscript. All authors revised the report and read and approved the final version before submission.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study used data obtained from a previously published study, the FROG-ICU study [18, 19], conducted in France and Belgium in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (Declaration of Helsinki 2002) and Ethical Committee approvals (Comité de Protection des Personnes—Ile de France IV, IRB n° 00003835 and Commission d’éthique biomédicale hospitalo-facultaire de l’hôpital de Louvain, IRB n°B403201213352).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Sigismond Lasocki has received speaker honoraria from VIFOR Pharma, MASIMO, LFB and fees as a member of the advisory board and/or Steering Committee from VIFOR Pharma and Pfizer. AM received speaker’s honoraria from Abbott, Novartis, Orion, Roche and Servier, and fees as a member of the advisory board and/or Steering Committee from Cardiorentis, Adrenomed, MyCartis, Neurotronik and Sphyngotec. EG received a research grant from Sphingotec, and consultancy fees from Magnisense and Roche Diagnostics. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Département Anesthésie Réanimation, UBL Université, CHU Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933 Angers Cedex 9, France
(2)
INSERM, UMR 1149/ERL CNRS 8252, Centre de Recherches sur l’inflammation, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
(3)
Laboratoire d’excellence du Globule Rouge GR-Ex ; APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Louis Mourier, Colombes, France
(4)
Department of Anesthesia, Université Paris Diderot ; U 942 Inserm ; APHP, Burn and Critical care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint louis – Lariboisiere, Paris, France

References

  1. Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zimmermann MB, Hurrell RF. Nutritional iron deficiency. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):511–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Haas JD, Brownlie T. Iron deficiency and reduced work capacity: a critical review of the research to determine a causal relationship. J Nutr. 2001;131(2S-2):676S–88S discussion 688S–690S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jankowska EA, Rozentryt P, Witkowska A, Nowak J, Hartmann O, Ponikowska B, Borodulin-Nadzieja L, Banasiak W, Polonski L, Filippatos G, et al. Iron deficiency: an ominous sign in patients with systolic chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(15):1872–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Klip IT, Comin-Colet J, Voors AA, Ponikowski P, Enjuanes C, Banasiak W, Lok DJ, Rosentryt P, Torrens A, Polonski L, et al. Iron deficiency in chronic heart failure: an international pooled analysis. Am Heart J. 2013;165(4):575–82 e573.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernandez R, Tubau I, Masip J, Munoz L, Roig I, Artigas A. Low reticulocyte hemoglobin content is associated with a higher blood transfusion rate in critically ill patients: a cohort study. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(5):1211–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pieracci FM, Barie PS. Diagnosis and management of iron-related anemias in critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(7):1898–905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellamy MC, Gedney JA. Unrecognised iron deficiency in critical illness. Lancet. 1998;352(9144):1903.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyon AW, Chin AC, Slotsve GA, Lyon ME. Simulation of repetitive diagnostic blood loss and onset of iatrogenic anemia in critical care patients with a mathematical model. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43(2):84–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. von Ahsen N, Muller C, Serke S, Frei U, Eckardt KU. Important role of nondiagnostic blood loss and blunted erythropoietic response in the anemia of medical intensive care patients. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(12):2630–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lasocki S, Longrois D, Montravers P, Beaumont C. Hepcidin and anemia of the critically ill patient. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(3):688–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lasocki S, Chudeau N, Papet T, Tartiere D, Roquilly A, Carlier L, Mimoz O, Seguin P, Malledant Y, Asehnoune K, et al. Prevalence of iron deficiency on ICU discharge and its relation with fatigue: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):542.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Piagnerelli M, Vincent JL. Role of iron in anaemic critically ill patients: it's time to investigate! Crit Care. 2004;8(5):306–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas DW, Hinchliffe RF, Briggs C, Macdougall IC, Littlewood T, Cavill I, British Committee for Standards in H. Guideline for the laboratory diagnosis of functional iron deficiency. Br J Haematol. 2013;161(5):639–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas C, Thomas L. Biochemical markers and hematologic indices in the diagnosis of functional iron deficiency. Clin Chem. 2002;48(7):1066–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ganz T. Systemic iron homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(4):1721–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lasocki S, Baron G, Driss F, Westerman M, Puy H, Boutron I, Beaumont C, Montravers P. Diagnostic accuracy of serum hepcidin for iron deficiency in critically ill patients with anemia. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(6):1044–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gayat E, Cariou A, Deye N, Vieillard-Baron A, Jaber S, Damoisel C, Lu Q, Monnet X, Rennuit I, Azoulay E, et al. Determinants of long-term outcome in ICU survivors: results from the FROG-ICU study. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mebazaa A, Casadio MC, Azoulay E, Guidet B, Jaber S, Levy B, Payen D, Vicaut E, Resche-Rigon M, Gayat E. Post-ICU discharge and outcome: rationale and methods of the The French and euRopean Outcome reGistry in Intensive Care Units (FROG-ICU) observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:143.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lefebvre T, Dessendier N, Houamel D, Ialy-Radio N, Kannengiesser C, Manceau H, Beaumont C, Nicolas G, Gouya L, Puy H, et al. LC-MS/MS method for hepcidin-25 measurement in human and mouse serum: clinical and research implications in iron disorders. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(10):1557–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Stevens GA, Finucane MM, De-Regil LM, Paciorek CJ, Flaxman SR, Branca F, Pena-Rosas JP, Bhutta ZA, Ezzati M, Nutrition Impact Model Study G. Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995-2011: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(1):e16–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Camaschella C. Iron deficiency: new insights into diagnosis and treatment. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:8–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Munoz M, Laso-Morales MJ, Gomez-Ramirez S, Cadellas M, Nunez-Matas MJ, Garcia-Erce JA. Pre-operative haemoglobin levels and iron status in a large multicentre cohort of patients undergoing major elective surgery. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(7):826–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen-Solal A, Leclercq C, Deray G, Lasocki S, Zambrowski JJ, Mebazaa A, de Groote P, Damy T, Galinier M. Iron deficiency: an emerging therapeutic target in heart failure. Heart. 2014;100(18):1414–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Pieracci FM, Henderson P, Rodney JR, Holena DN, Genisca A, Ip I, Benkert S, Hydo LJ, Eachempati SR, Shou J, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of effects of enteral iron supplementation on anemia and risk of infection during surgical critical illness. Surg Infect. 2009;10(1):9–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Munoz M, Romero A, Morales M, Campos A, Garcia-Erce JA, Ramirez G. Iron metabolism, inflammation and anemia in critically ill patients. A cross-sectional study. Nutr Hosp. 2005;20(2):115–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodriguez RM, Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Corwin MJ, Gubler D, Pearl RG. Nutritional deficiencies and blunted erythropoietin response as causes of the anemia of critical illness. J Crit Care. 2001;16(1):36–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Vorm LN, Hendriks JC, Laarakkers CM, Klaver S, Armitage AE, Bamberg A, Geurts-Moespot AJ, Girelli D, Herkert M, Itkonen O, et al. Toward worldwide hepcidin assay harmonization: identification of a commutable secondary reference material. Clin Chem. 2016;62(7):993–1001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Cherry-Bukowiec JR, Engoren M, Wiktor A, Raghavendran K, Napolitano LM. Hepcidin and anemia in surgical critical care: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(6):e567–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lasocki S, Millot S, Andrieu V, Letteron P, Pilard N, Muzeau F, Thibaudeau O, Montravers P, Beaumont C. Phlebotomies or erythropoietin injections allow mobilization of iron stores in a mouse model mimicking intensive care anemia. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2388–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Rineau E, Gaillard T, Gueguen N, Procaccio V, Henrion D, Prunier F, Lasocki S. Iron deficiency without anemia is responsible for decreased left ventricular function and reduced mitochondrial complex I activity in a mouse model. Int J Cardiol. 2018;266:206–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Patterson AJ, Brown WJ, Powers JR, Roberts DC. Iron deficiency, general health and fatigue: results from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(5):491–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Jankowska EA, Tkaczyszyn M, Suchocki T, Drozd M, von Haehling S, Doehner W, Banasiak W, Filippatos G, Anker SD, Ponikowski P. Effects of intravenous iron therapy in iron-deficient patients with systolic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(7):786–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Krayenbuehl PA, Battegay E, Breymann C, Furrer J, Schulthess G. Intravenous iron for the treatment of fatigue in nonanemic, premenopausal women with low serum ferritin concentration. Blood. 2011;118(12):3222–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Heming N, Letteron P, Driss F, Millot S, El Benna J, Tourret J, Denamur E, Montravers P, Beaumont C, Lasocki S. Efficacy and toxicity of intravenous iron in a mouse model of critical care anemia. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(7):2141–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lasocki S, Piednoir P, Couffignal C, Rineau E, Dufour G, Lefebvre T, Puy H, Duval X, Driss F, Schilte C. Does IV iron induce plasma oxidative stress in critically ill patients? A comparison with healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(3):521–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Investigators I, Litton E, Baker S, Erber WN, Farmer S, Ferrier J, French C, Gummer J, Hawkins D, Higgins A, et al. Intravenous iron or placebo for anaemia in intensive care: the IRONMAN multicentre randomized blinded trial: a randomized trial of IV iron in critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(11):1715–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Lasocki S, Puy H, Mercier G, Lehmann S, Hepcidane study g. Impact of iron deficiency diagnosis using hepcidin mass spectrometry dosage methods on hospital stay and costs after a prolonged ICU stay: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, single-blinded medico-economic trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(6):391–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement