Open Access

Bench-to-bedside review: the effects of hyperoxia during critical illness

  • Hendrik J. F. Helmerhorst1, 2Email author,
  • Marcus J. Schultz2, 3,
  • Peter H. J. van der Voort4, 5,
  • Evert de Jonge1 and
  • David J. van Westerloo1
Critical Care201519:284

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0996-4

Published: 17 August 2015

Abstract

Oxygen administration is uniformly used in emergency and intensive care medicine and has life-saving potential in critical conditions. However, excessive oxygenation also has deleterious properties in various pathophysiological processes and consequently both clinical and translational studies investigating hyperoxia during critical illness have gained increasing interest. Reactive oxygen species are notorious by-products of hyperoxia and play a pivotal role in cell signaling pathways. The effects are diverse, but when the homeostatic balance is disturbed, reactive oxygen species typically conserve a vicious cycle of tissue injury, characterized by cell damage, cell death, and inflammation. The most prominent symptoms in the abundantly exposed lungs include tracheobronchitis, pulmonary edema, and respiratory failure. In addition, absorptive atelectasis results as a physiological phenomenon with increasing levels of inspiratory oxygen. Hyperoxia-induced vasoconstriction can be beneficial during vasodilatory shock, but hemodynamic changes may also impose risk when organ perfusion is impaired. In this context, oxygen may be recognized as a multifaceted agent, a modifiable risk factor, and a feasible target for intervention. Although most clinical outcomes are still under extensive investigation, careful titration of oxygen supply is warranted in order to secure adequate tissue oxygenation while preventing hyperoxic harm.

Introduction

Oxygen is a vital element in human survival and plays a major role in a diverse range of biological and physiological processes. In medical practice, it is among the most universally used agents for the treatment of critical illness [1] and part of the routine treatment in acute shock and emergency medicine [2]. To ensure sufficient oxygenation, oxygen therapy during mechanical ventilation, anesthesia, and resuscitation usually exceeds physiological levels. However, Renaissance physician Paracelsus noted: “nothing is without poison—the poison is in the dose”. This accounts for many aspects in medicine but may also be applicable to the oxygen molecule [3]. The concept of oxygen toxicity was described in the late 19th century following the pioneering efforts of James Lorrain Smith and Paul Bert, but it was not until a century later that the effects of hyperoxia were increasingly studied. Although several lines of evidence indicate that hyperoxia may be harmful, robust interventional studies are still limited. To develop adequate recommendations for optimal oxygen levels, it is important to extend our current understandings of hyperoxia-induced injury. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of hyperoxia from the bench and the bedside. The first part will focus on established insights and recent experimental and translational advances; the latter part addresses pathophysiological concepts, clinical studies, and implications for therapy.

Pathogenesis from the benchside

Reactive oxygen species

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are versatile molecules that can be essential in the regulation of intracellular signaling pathways and in host defense [4]. However, ROS have also repeatedly been postulated to be of major significance in tissue damage, organ dysfunction, and clinical disease. In regard to oxygen toxicity, it is frequently assumed that it is not oxygen itself that exerts toxic effects but merely the ROS that are generated as an undesirable by-product of adenosine triphosphate synthesis during aerobic cellular metabolism. The implications for the lungs are probably the most prominent as lung tissue is continuously and abundantly exposed to oxygen and its by-products. In physiological circumstances, ROS are formed in the electron transport chain during proton transport across the inner mitochondrial membrane. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is the most important source of oxygen species, but ROS may also be generated in response to exogenous stimuli, such as microbes, cytokines, and xenobiotics [5]. Antioxidant tasks are accomplished by enzymes as catalases, glutathione peroxidases, thioredoxins, and peroxyredoxins. These enzymes use electron donors in order to avoid the intermediate formation of the hydroxyl radical (OH∙), which is a strongly reactive oxidant. In this process, superoxide dismutase is an important antioxidant enzyme as it efficiently reduces the concentration of the superoxide anion (O2) by facilitating its rapid conversion in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or oxygen (O2). In general, ROS generation from mitochondria increases with oxygen tension and is dependent on the clinical balance between the underlying condition and oxygen supply [6]. In response to bacterial invasion, neutrophils can also produce large amounts of ROS that may initially be beneficial in the host defense against several pathogens. Fortunately, the lungs are principally well protected against oxygen toxicity by adequate intra—and extracellular antioxidant activity. Besides this physiological activity, additional antioxidants can be recruited in the epithelial lining fluid [7]. However, when the production of ROS exceeds the limits of counteraction by antioxidant responses, ROS concentrations reach inadequate levels and a cellular state of oxidative stress manifests. Oxidative stress refers to the imbalance caused by increased ROS formation or deficient oxidant suppressors [8]. When antioxidant systems are insufficient during critical illness and mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen can cause accumulation of oxygen radicals and may initiate or perpetuate oxygen toxicity. Moreover, ROS control can be markedly influenced by aging, genetic factors, and pharmacochemical agents [6].

Cell death

When the delicate homeostatic balance is disturbed, oxidative stress leads to damage of nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids, resulting in cell death by both apoptotic and necrotic pathways [9]. Necrosis is characterized by incomplete apoptosis and supported by integrity loss of the cell membrane and cytoplasmic swelling. Programmed cell death by apoptosis can be achieved through extrinsic or intrinsic pathways, concomitantly. The extrinsic pathway is triggered by extracellular signals that stimulate intracellular apoptotic cascades after binding the cell membrane. The intrinsic apoptotic pathway is initiated by increased mitochondrial ROS formation. Subsequently, the opening of transition pores is facilitated, making the outer mitochondrial membrane more permeable for pro-apoptotic components. These components can then pass to the cytoplasm and induce a state of intracellular stress. When this occurs in both endothelial and epithelial cells, lytic damage and cell death contribute to interstitial pulmonary edema and impaired gas exchange by means of alveolar collapse and disintegration of the alveolar-capillary barrier.

Cell damage and inflammatory pathways

In addition to direct cell death by necrosis or apoptosis, cellular disruption caused by hyperoxia and ROS has been shown to release endogenous damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) that alert the innate immune system [1012]. DAMPs, or alarmins, are cell fragments released during cellular dysfunction and sterile injury and act as pleiotropic modulators of inflammation. During oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage is a pivotal cause of extracellular hazardous content including both free radicals and DAMPs. Because they resemble bacterial DNA, circulating mitochondrial DAMPs are efficiently recognized by pattern recognition receptors and activate polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs). Subsequently, PMNs release interleukins and contribute to a sterile inflammatory reaction and, ultimately, neutrophil-mediated organ injury. In response to hyperoxia-mediated ROS production, resident lung cells initiate the release of various cytokines. Chemotactic factors orchestrate the inflammatory response by attracting inflammatory cells to the pulmonary compartment. Recruited neutrophils and monocytes, in turn, are significant sources of additional ROS, conserving a vicious cycle leading to further tissue damage (Fig. 1). Under enduring conditions of injury to pulmonary epithelium and increasing alveolar permeability, cytokines can translocate from the alveolar space to the systemic circulation, creating a systemic inflammatory response, in which cytokines are efficiently activated and phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages is hampered [13]. Cytokine concentrations decrease after long-term exposure, suggesting that a fast upregulation of inflammatory action is followed by a gradual impairment of the innate immune system [14]. Besides mitochondrial damage, the inflammatory actions of oxygen are importantly modulated by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) [15, 16]. HIF-1α is thought to be upregulated during relative changes in oxygenation and accordingly responds to normoxia as a relative hypoxic state directly after hyperoxia. Through this mechanism, intermittent hyperoxia may trigger a paradoxical phenomenon in which the genetic expression of inflammatory mediators and erythropoietin is stimulated in the absence of true tissue hypoxia [17].
Fig. 1

Vicious cycle of hyperoxia-induced cell injury. AP activator protein, DAMP damage-associated molecular pattern molecules, H 2 O 2 hydrogen peroxide, IFN interferon gamma, IL interleukin, MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase, NADPH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, NF-κB nuclear factor kappa B, NLR nod-like receptor, Nrf2 nuclear factor-2 erythroid related factor-2, O 2 oxygen, O 2 ·− superoxide, OH · hydroxyl radical, ONOO peroxynitrite, PMN polymorphonuclear neutrophil, RAGE receptor for advanced glycation end products, ROS reactive oxygen species, TLR Toll-like receptor, TNF tumor necrosis factor, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor

Animal studies

Principal insights in hyperoxia-induced mechanisms have been obtained from experimental models. The first animal studies documented structural morphologic and biochemical changes in the lungs of a wide variety of animal species that were exposed to hyperoxia [18]. Pioneering studies using conscious dogs postulated that normobaric hyperoxia decreased metabolic rate and altered hemodynamics [19, 20]. These findings were reproduced in primates in which progressive pulmonary injury, interstitial edema, and inflammatory activation were observed [21]. In later experiments, biochemical effects of ROS and interventional targets on the molecular level were more intensively studied in spontaneously breathing animals in hyperoxic environments and showed both detrimental and protective potential [2226]. Recent experiments were performed in mechanically ventilated rodents, rabbits, and pigs, mimicking the clinical environment of critically ill patients [2731]. In this context, the interaction between injurious ventilation and concurrent hyperoxia was shown to transcend lung injury by alveolar distention alone [22, 3235]. However, studies in mechanically ventilated animals are usually restricted to short exposure periods [32, 3438], even though hyperoxia may induce time-dependent inflammation [23]. To improve our understanding of the impact of long-term exposure to both mechanical ventilation and hyperoxia, future studies involving mechanical ventilation of longer duration and with clinically relevant settings are essential for a robust representation of the ICU environment.

Pathogenesis from the bedside

Hyperoxia-induced tissue injury

Under normobaric circumstances, the side effects of oxygen are initially restricted to the lungs. However, when hyperoxia manifests for prolonged periods or under hyperbaric conditions, other organs are concurrently at risk as more oxygen is dissolved in plasma [6]. The amount of dissolved oxygen will readily increase at partial pressures of arterial oxygen (PaO2) exceeding 100 mm Hg. Oxyhemoglobin saturation is nearly complete when PaO2 approaches this level and the carrying capacity of hemoglobin is therefore quickly overcharged with increasing fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO2).

The harmful effects depend on underlying conditions, duration, and degree of the hyperoxic exposure. Rigid thresholds where harm exceeds the perceived benefits are not exactly known and may vary between subgroups [39]. Most pathophysiological changes originate rapidly and are rather universal effects, but the effects of hyperoxia are assumed to be time—and dose-dependent [40]. In general, excessive oxygen supply causes absorptive atelectasis by displacement of alveolar nitrogen. The progressive washout of nitrogen coincides with the abundant presence of oxygen in the alveoli which, driven by a steep pressure gradient, rapidly diffuses into the mixed venous blood. As a result, the alveolar volume is markedly reduced and leads to increased ventilation/perfusion mismatch by (partial) alveolar collapse and impaired gas exchange, which can be attenuated by applying positive end-expiratory pressure [41]. Impaired mucociliary clearance by hyperoxia contributes to obstructive atelectasis, and altered surfactant metabolism facilitates adhesive atelectasis through alveolar instability and collapse. Several lines of evidence indicate further effects of breathing high oxygen levels in animals and healthy subjects [1, 42], but evidence of pulmonary toxicity in a clinical scenario is limited [43]. The pathological features of this condition are commonly referred to as the Lorrain Smith effect [44] and are characterized by tracheobronchitis, which can be accompanied by pleuritic pain, bronchial irritation, cough, and sore throat. Symptoms may spread from the upper airways into the lungs, where diffuse alveolar damage manifests and contributes to edema, vascular leakage, arteriolar thickening, pulmonary fibrosis, and emphysema, reflected by progressive paradoxical hypoxia, dyspnea, and tachypnea. Additionally, prolonged hyperoxic exposure alters the microbial flora in the upper airways and further increases the risk of secondary infections and lethality. Notably, these pulmonary effects are often in addition to the primary (e.g., pneumonia) and secondary (e.g., ventilator-induced lung injury) lung injury, which are accompanied by inflammatory responses.

The central nervous system is typically the first to suffer from the effects of excessive ROS formation. The spectrum of neurological symptoms is referred to as the Paul Bert effect and ranges from nausea, dizziness, and headache to vision disturbances (retinal damage), neuropathies, paralysis, and convulsions [1].

Vascular effects of hyperoxia have been well documented and may have both harmful and beneficial effects. Arterial hyperoxia increases the systemic vascular resistance and induces vasoconstriction, which may impair organ perfusion, especially in the cerebral and coronary region [4547]. Accompanying cardiovascular alterations result from even short-term exposure and include a decrease in heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output [48]. However, hyperoxia is not a universal vasoconstrictor in all vascular regions, and blood flow may be redistributed to the hepatosplanchnic circulation in septic shock [1, 49]. Alternatively, the administration of oxygen promotes hemodynamic stabilization during vasodilatory shock, decreases intracranial pressure by cerebral vasoconstriction, and preserves tissue oxygenation during hemodilution [2, 50].

Clinical studies

Critical care

Recent studies assessing the clinical effects of arterial hyperoxia or normobaric supplemental oxygen in critical care are listed in Table 1. As highlighted in recent meta-analyses [51, 52], the effects on major clinical endpoints are conflicting and may be partially explained by heterogeneous methodology and subgroup differences in critically ill patients. Pooled effect estimates favoring normoxia are quite consistent, but the harmful effects were previously shown to be impacted by the definition of hyperoxia and may be more pertinent to specific subgroups and at specific moments of admission.
Table 1

Studies assessing the clinical effects of arterial hyperoxia or supplemental oxygen in subgroups of critically ill patients

Author

Country

Study type

Inclusion period

Subgroup

Sample size

Harm

Conclusions

Eastwood et al. [57] (2012)

Australia and New Zealand

Cohort

2000–2009

MV

152,680

Hypoxia in first 24 h of admission was associated with increased in-hospital mortality, but hyperoxia was not.

de Jonge et al. [56] (2008)

The Netherlands

Cohort

1999–2006

MV

36,307

+

High FiO2 and both low PaO2 and high PaO2 in first 24 h of admission were associated with in-hospital mortality

Suzuki et al. [96] (2014)

Australia

Before-after pilot

2012

MV

105

+/–

Conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients was feasible and free of adverse biochemical, physiological, or clinical outcomes while allowing a marked decrease in excess oxygen exposure

Aboab et al. [41] (2006)

France

Experimental

NA

ARDS

14

+/–

In mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS, the breathing of pure oxygen leads to alveolar derecruitment, which is prevented by high PEEP

Austin et al. [53] (2010)

Australia

RCT

2006–2007

COPD

405

+

Titrated oxygen treatment significantly reduced mortality, hypercapnia, and respiratory acidosis compared with high-flow oxygen in acute exacerbations of COPD

Cameron et al. [55] (2012)

New Zealand

Cohort

2005–2008

COPD

180

+

Serious adverse clinical outcomes are associated with both hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia during acute exacerbations

Perrin et al. [54] (2011)

New Zealand

RCT

2007–2009

Asthma

106

+

High-concentration oxygen therapy causes a clinically significant increase in transcutaneous CO2 during severe exacerbations

Bellomo et al. [63] (2011)

Australia and New Zealand

Cohort

2000–2009

CA

12,108

Hyperoxia did not have a robust or consistently reproducible association with mortality

Elmer et al. [62] (2014)

USA

Cohort

2008–2010

CA

184

+

Severe hyperoxia was independently associated with decreased survival to hospital discharge

Ihle et al. [64] (2013)

Australia

Cohort

2007–2011

CA

584

Hyperoxia within the first 24 h was not associated with increased hospital mortality

Janz et al. [61] (2012)

USA

Cohort

2007–2012

CA

170

+

Higher levels of the maximum measured PaO2 were associated with increased in-hospital mortality and poor neurological status on hospital discharge

Kilgannon et al. [59] (2010)

USA

Cohort

2001–2005

CA

6326

+

Arterial hyperoxia was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared with either hypoxia or normoxia

Kilgannon et al. [60] (2011)

USA

Cohort substudy

2001–2005

CA

4459

+

Supranormal oxygen tension was dose-dependently associated with the risk of in-hospital death

Kuisma et al. [69] (2006)

Finland

RCT pilot

NA

CA

28

No indication that 30 % oxygen with SpO2 monitoring did worse than the group receiving 100 % oxygen

Lee et al. [65] (2014)

Korea

Cohort

2008–2012

CA

213

Mean PaO2 was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality

Nelskyla et al. [112] (2013)

Australia

Cohort

2008–2010

CA

122

No statistically significant differences in numbers of patients discharged from the hospital and 30-day survival between patients with hyperoxia exposure and no exposure

Spindelboeck et al. [67] (2013)

Austria

Cohort

2003–2010

CA

145

Increasing PaO2 was associated with a significantly increased rate of hospital admission and not with harmful effects

Vaahersalo et al. [66] (2014)

Finland

Cohort

2010–2011

CA

409

Hypercapnia was associated with good 12-month outcome, but harm from hyperoxia exposure was not verified

Minana et al. [113] (2011)

Spain

Cohort

2003–2009

ADHF

588

Admission PaO2 was not associated with all-cause long-term mortality

Ranchord et al. [114] (2012)

New Zealand

RCT pilot

2007–2009

STEMI

136

No evidence of benefit or harm from high-concentration compared with titrated oxygen

Stub et al. [78] (2012)

Australia

RCT

2011–2014

STEMI

441

+

Supplemental oxygen therapy in patients with STEMI but without hypoxia increased myocardial injury, recurrent myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrhythmia and was associated with larger myocardial infarct size at 6 months. Further results anticipated.

Sutton et al. [115] (2014)

Australia and New Zealand

Cohort

2003–2012

Post cardiac surgery

83,060

No association between mortality and hyperoxia in the first 24 h in ICU after cardiac surgery

Ukholkina et al. [80] (2005)

Russia

RCT

NA

AMI

137

Inhalation of 30–40 % oxygen within 30 min prior to endovascular myocardial reperfusion and within 4 h thereafter reduced the area of necrosis and peri-infarction area, improved central hemodynamics, and decreased the rate of post-operative rhythm disorders as compared with patients breathing ambient air

Zughaft et al. [116] (2013)

Sweden

RCT

NA

ACS

300

The use of oxygen during PCI did not demonstrate any analgesic effect and no difference in myocardial injury measured with troponin- t or in the morphine dose

Asher et al. [89] (2013)

USA

Cohort

NA

TBI

193

PaO2 threshold between 250 and 486 mm Hg during the first 72 h after injury was associated with improved all-cause survival independently of hypocarbia or hypercarbia

Brenner et al. [88] (2012)

USA

Cohort

2002–2007

TBI

1547

+

Hyperoxia within the first 24 h of hospitalization was associated with worse short-term functional outcomes and higher mortality

Davis et al. [87] (2009)

USA

Cohort

1987–2003

TBI

3420

+

Both hypoxemia and extreme hyperoxemia were associated with increased mortality and a decrease in good outcomes

Quintard et al. [83] (2014)

Switzerland

Cohort

2009–2013

TBI

36

+

Incremental normobaric FiO2 levels were associated with increased cerebral excitotoxicity independently from brain tissue oxygen and other important cerebral and systemic determinants

Raj et al. [90] (2013)

Finland

Cohort

2003–2012

TBI

1116

Hyperoxemia in the first 24 h of admission was not predictive of 6-month mortality

Rincon et al. [92] (2013)

USA

Cohort

2003–2008

TBI

1212

+

Arterial hyperoxia was independently associated with higher in-hospital case fatality

Jeon et al. [84] (2014)

USA

Cohort

1996–2011

Stroke

252

+

Exposure to hyperoxia was associated with delayed cerebral ischemia

Rincon et al. [85] (2014)

USA

Cohort

2003–2008

Stroke

2894

+

Arterial hyperoxia was independently associated with in-hospital death as compared with either normoxia or hypoxia

Ali et al. [82] (2014) and Roffe et al. [117] (2011)

UK

RCT pilot

2004–2008

Stroke

289

Routine oxygen supplementation started within 24 h of hospital admission with acute stroke led to a small improvement in neurological recovery at 1 week, but no outcome differences were observed at 6 months

Ronning et al. [81] (1999)

Norway

Quasi-RCT

1994–1995

Stroke

310

+

Supplemental oxygen should not routinely be given to non-hypoxic patients with minor or moderate strokes

Singhal et al. [118] (2005)

USA

RCT pilot

NA

Stroke

16

High-flow oxygen therapy is associated with a transient improvement of clinical deficits and MRI abnormalities

Young et al. [91] (2012)

Australia and New Zealand

Cohort

2000–2009

Stroke

2643

Worst arterial oxygen tension in the first 24 h was not associated with outcome

Stolmeijer et al. [119] (2014)

The Netherlands

Cohort

NA

Sepsis

83

No association between mortality and hyperoxia, nor between lower FiO2 and other detrimental effects

NA, not available; +, study found harm from supplemental oxygen or arterial hyperoxia; –, no harm found from supplemental oxygen or arterial hyperoxia

ACS Acute coronary syndrome, ADHF Acute decompensated heart failure, AMI Acute myocardial infarction, ARDS Acute respiratory distress syndrome, CA Cardiac arrest, CO 2 Carbon dioxide, COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FiO 2 Fraction of inspired oxygen, ICU Intensive care unit, MRI Magnetic resonance imaging, PaO 2 Partial pressure of arterial oxygen, PCI Percutaneous coronary intervention, MV Mechanical ventilation, PEEP Positive end-expiratory pressure, RCT Randomized control trial, SpO 2 Oxyhemoglobin saturation, STEMI ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, TBI Traumatic brain injury

It is well established that the use of higher FiO2 can lead to progressive hypercapnia during a state of chronic compensated respiratory acidosis, and serious adverse outcomes have been shown in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma [5355]. Likewise, high fractions of oxygen in the inspired air and arterial blood have been associated with increased mortality in mechanically ventilated patients [56].

Owing to a striking lack of robust clinical trials, a causal relationship is still uncertain and both the magnitude and direction of the associations depend on the adjustment for illness severity scores, FiO2, and other confounders [56, 57]. Future randomized controlled studies are urgently needed to definitively elucidate the causal effects of oxygenation targets and derangements on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients.

Excessive oxygenation may be most intensively studied after resuscitation from cardiac arrest as both the vascular alterations and the ischemia and reperfusion injury are hypothesized to be hazardous [58]. In a dose-dependent manner, hyperoxia has been linked to worse outcome in these patients [5962]. The adverse association was not systematically reproduced and this was possibly due to heterogeneity in study methods [6368]. The only randomized controlled trial in the post-resuscitation period found that 30 % oxygen ventilation was not worse in comparison with 100 % oxygen, but the study was underpowered to detect significant differences [69]. In view of all recent data, supplemental oxygen administration during resuscitation still appears desirable, but hyperoxia should be avoided in the post-resuscitation phase and saturation should be targeted at 94–96 % [58, 70].

A large number of both experimental and clinical studies have primed pediatricians with great awareness of the risks of hyperoxia. For neonatal resuscitation, the routine use of 100 % oxygen has been abandoned after numerous associations with myocardial, neurological, and kidney injury and retinopathy, inflammation, and increased mortality [71, 72]. However, strict adherence to lower target ranges of oxygen saturation among preterm infants did not significantly reduce disability or deaths [73]. Results from a prospective large-scale meta-analysis investigating the most appropriate level of oxygenation for extremely preterm neonates suggested that functional oxyhemoglobin saturation be targeted at 90–95 % in the post-natal period [74].

Hyperoxia-induced vasoconstriction poses a major concern in the management of acute coronary syndromes, and guidelines increasingly suggest a restriction of supplementary oxygen to only those at increased risk for hypoxia [75]. Indeed, oxygen therapy has not been shown to be beneficial after acute myocardial infarction and may even be harmful, causing a marked reduction in coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption [76, 77]. The vasoconstriction caused by hyperoxia may be of special concern in the acute setting before reperfusion. The AVOID (Air Verses Oxygen In myocarDial infarction) trial aimed to definitively qualify the role of supplemental oxygen in acute myocardial infarction [78] and found increased myocardial injury, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia, and infarct size at 6 months [79]. In contrast, a smaller trial observed a beneficial effect of 30–40 % oxygen inhalation over controls during both occlusion and reperfusion [80]. Hemodynamic effects may also be pertinent to acute ischemic stroke patients, who do not appear to benefit from increased survival after prolonged treatment with oxygen [81, 82].

Despite the theoretical benefit of decreasing intracranial pressure through cerebral vasoconstriction, hyperoxia has repeatedly been associated with delayed cerebral ischemia and increased cerebral excitotoxicity after cerebrovascular incidents [8385]. Interestingly, the synergistic combination of hyperbaric and normobaric hyperoxia was recently found to have potential therapeutic efficacy in severe traumatic brain injury [86]. However, observational data in patients with traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke, subarachnoid, or intracerebral hemorrhage remain equivocal [8792].

Perioperative care

Liberal oxygen supply is usually accepted in perioperative care in order to avoid potentially life-threatening consequences of hypoxia during surgery. Further effects of perioperative hyperoxia have been comprehensively summarized in meta-analyses enrolling over 7000 patients and generally showed a reduced risk of surgical site infections and postoperative nausea without luxation of postoperative atelectasis [93, 94]. However, risks may outweigh benefits in specific age groups [39] and different subsets. This was recently highlighted in patients undergoing cancer surgery in whom 80 % oxygen supply in the perioperative setting showed a significantly increased long-term all-cause mortality compared with those randomly assigned to 30 % [95].

Implications for therapy

Several therapeutic options that limit the harmful effects of hyperoxia can be contemplated, but prevention of excessive oxygenation is likely to be the most effective strategy. A rational approach may be a more conservative administration strategy in which oxygen is titrated to a lower tolerable level in order to prevent iatrogenic harm while preserving adequate tissue oxygenation. Recently, a pilot interventional study showed that conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU can be feasible and free of adverse outcomes while decreasing excess oxygen exposure [96]. Importantly, when the risks for severe tissue hypoxia are pronounced, ample oxygen supply remains vital and should be started immediately to increase oxygen delivery and preserve tissue oxygenation. Also, oxygen may aid hemodynamic stabilization and decrease intracranial pressure and can be used to stimulate erythropoietin and increase hemoglobin when intermittent hyperoxia is used as a paradoxical trigger for HIF expression.

Experimental interventions to decrease harm from hyperoxia are targeted at numerous steps in the pathway of ROS-induced damage. The primary source for intervention in the oxidative cycle is inhibition of oxidant generation, either quantitatively or qualitatively. Bleomycin and amiodarone are well-known originators of drug-induced pulmonary disease and should be avoided to minimize preventable ROS formation [97, 98]. Limiting the exposure to other exogenous stimuli or preventing electron leakage in the electron transport chain may protect the mitochondria, but this strategy proves cumbersome in actual practice. Although the clinical applicability has been questioned because of little or no preventative or therapeutic effect, the supply of antioxidant enzymes may be a feasible approach to facilitate the conversion, avoid the intermediate formation, and reduce the concentration of strongly reactive oxidants. However, some of these antioxidants may actually have pro-oxidant properties, depending on their concentration and interaction with other molecules. The neutralizing effect of antioxidants may not be sufficient to secure metabolic stability, even when secondary inflammation is mitigated. Finally, oxidant scavenging can shift the balance toward harm when the role of oxidants in cell signaling pathways is suppressed [99].

As an alternative, pathways of cell integrity, cell death, and inflammation may be targeted to reduce further damage and enhance the defense against oxygen radicals. Experimental research suggests protective effects through modulation of protein kinases [100, 101] and transcription factors [102105]. Moreover, numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated that manipulation of chemokines, cytokines [13, 106], growth factors [107], receptors [108110], and DAMPs [11, 12, 111] may limit hyperoxia-induced injury, but these targets all remain to be evaluated at the bedside.

Conclusions

Although oxygen remains of life-saving importance in critical care, accumulating evidence has demonstrated the prominent role of hyperoxia and the consequent formation of ROS in the pathogenesis of several life-threatening diseases. The toxic effects of supraphysiological oxygen concentrations are driven by cell damage, cell death, and inflammation. These aspects are of special concern in the pulmonary compartment, where absorptive atelectasis impairs respiratory function at high inspiratory oxygen levels. The cerebral and coronary circulations are at specific risk when vascular alterations manifest. Long-term exposure to hyperoxia impairs the innate immune response and increases susceptibility to infectious complications and tissue injury. Given that critically ill patients are prone to inflammation, cardiovascular instability, and depleted antioxidant mechanisms, the most rational practice may be to supply oxygen conservatively and titrate the therapy carefully to the patient’s needs. However, our understanding of oxygen toxicity is limited in humans, and conflicting findings hamper the constitution of compelling guidelines. Further research is warranted to study hyperoxia-induced effects in clinical practice, to elucidate time—and dose-response relationships, and to provide evidence-based oxygenation targets and interventions through robust clinical trials.

Abbreviations

DAMP: 

Damage-associated molecular pattern molecule

FiO2

Fraction of inspired oxygen

HIF: 

Hypoxia-inducible factor

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

PaO2

Partial pressure of arterial oxygen

PMN: 

Polymorphonuclear neutrophil

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

Declarations

Acknowledgments

For the preparation of Fig. 1, the creative support of Iris Levert is gratefully acknowledged.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center
(2)
Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center
(3)
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center
(4)
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
(5)
TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University

References

  1. Bitterman H. Bench-to-bedside review: oxygen as a drug. Crit Care. 2009;13:205.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1726–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Altemeier WA, Sinclair SE. Hyperoxia in the intensive care unit: why more is not always better. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:73–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Magder S. Reactive oxygen species: toxic molecules or spark of life? Crit Care. 2006;10:208.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ray PD, Huang BW, Tsuji Y. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cell Signal. 2012;24:981–90.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Turrens JF. Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J Physiol. 2003;552:335–44.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Comhair SA, Erzurum SC. Antioxidant responses to oxidant-mediated lung diseases. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;283:L246–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nathan C, Cunningham-Bussel A. Beyond oxidative stress: an immunologist’s guide to reactive oxygen species. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:349–61.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barazzone C, Horowitz S, Donati YR, Rodriguez I, Piguet PF. Oxygen toxicity in mouse lung: pathways to cell death. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998;19:573–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464:104–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuipers MT, van der Poll T, Schultz MJ, Wieland CW. Bench-to-bedside review: damage-associated molecular patterns in the onset of ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care. 2011;15:235.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan JK, Roth J, Oppenheim JJ, Tracey KJ, Vogl T, Feldmann M, et al. Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2711–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhandari V, Elias JA. Cytokines in tolerance to hyperoxia-induced injury in the developing and adult lung. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;41:4–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Baleeiro CE, Wilcoxen SE, Morris SB, Standiford TJ, Paine 3rd R. Sublethal hyperoxia impairs pulmonary innate immunity. J Immunol. 2003;171:955–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Krysko DV, Agostinis P, Krysko O, Garg AD, Bachert C, Lambrecht BN, et al. Emerging role of damage-associated molecular patterns derived from mitochondria in inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:157–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eltzschig HK, Carmeliet P. Hypoxia and inflammation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:656–65.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rocco M, D’Itri L, De Bels D, Corazza F, Balestra C. The “normobaric oxygen paradox”: a new tool for the anesthetist? Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80:366–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Crapo JD. Morphological-changes in pulmonary oxygen-toxicity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1986;48:721–31.Google Scholar
  19. Lodato RF. Effects of normobaric hyperoxia on hemodynamics and O2 utilization in conscious dogs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1990;277:807–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lodato RF. Decreased O2 consumption and cardiac output during normobaric hyperoxia in conscious dogs. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989;67:1551–9.Google Scholar
  21. Fracica PJ, Knapp MJ, Piantadosi CA, Takeda K, Fulkerson WJ, Coleman RE, et al. Responses of baboons to prolonged hyperoxia: physiology and qualitative pathology. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991;71:2352–62.Google Scholar
  22. Bailey TC, Martin EL, Zhao L, Veldhuizen RA. High oxygen concentrations predispose mouse lungs to the deleterious effects of high stretch ventilation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003;94:975–82.Google Scholar
  23. Nagato AC, Bezerra FS, Lanzetti M, Lopes AA, Silva MA, Porto LC, et al. Time course of inflammation, oxidative stress and tissue damage induced by hyperoxia in mouse lungs. Int J Exp Pathol. 2012;93:269–78.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nagato A, Silva FL, Silva AR, Bezerra FS, Oliveira ML, Bello-Klein A, et al. Hyperoxia-induced lung injury is dose dependent in Wistar rats. Exp Lung Res. 2009;35:713–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hou L, Xie K, Qin M, Peng D, Ma S, Shang L, et al. Effects of reactive oxygen species scavenger on the protective action of 100 % oxygen treatment against sterile inflammation in mice. Shock. 2010;33:646–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Waisman D, Brod V, Rahat MA, Amit-Cohen BC, Lahat N, Rimar D, et al. Dose-related effects of hyperoxia on the lung inflammatory response in septic rats. Shock. 2012;37:95–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kikuchi Y, Tateda K, Fuse ET, Matsumoto T, Gotoh N, Fukushima J, et al. Hyperoxia exaggerates bacterial dissemination and lethality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2009;22:333–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez-Gonzalez R, Martin-Barrasa JL, Ramos-Nuez A, Canas-Pedrosa AM, Martinez-Saavedra MT, Garcia-Bello MA, et al. Multiple system organ response induced by hyperoxia in a clinically relevant animal model of sepsis. Shock. 2014;42:148–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tateda K, Deng JC, Moore TA, Newstead MW, Paine 3rd R, Kobayashi N, et al. Hyperoxia mediates acute lung injury and increased lethality in murine Legionella pneumonia: the role of apoptosis. J Immunol. 2003;170:4209–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Barth E, Bassi G, Maybauer DM, Simon F, Groger M, Oter S, et al. Effects of ventilation with 100 % oxygen during early hyperdynamic porcine fecal peritonitis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:495–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sukhotnik I, Krausz MM, Brod V, Balan M, Turkieh A, Siplovich L, et al. Divergent effects of oxygen therapy in four models of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. Shock. 2002;18:277–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li LF, Liao SK, Ko YS, Lee CH, Quinn DA. Hyperoxia increases ventilator-induced lung injury via mitogen-activated protein kinases: a prospective, controlled animal experiment. Crit Care. 2007;11:R25.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Makena PS, Luellen CL, Balazs L, Ghosh MC, Parthasarathi K, Waters CM, et al. Preexposure to hyperoxia causes increased lung injury and epithelial apoptosis in mice ventilated with high tidal volumes. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2010;299:L711–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Quinn DA, Moufarrej RK, Volokhov A, Hales CA. Interactions of lung stretch, hyperoxia, and MIP-2 production in ventilator-induced lung injury. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002;93:517–25.Google Scholar
  35. Liu YY, Liao SK, Huang CC, Tsai YH, Quinn DA, Li LF. Role for nuclear factor-kappaB in augmented lung injury because of interaction between hyperoxia and high stretch ventilation. Transl Res. 2009;154:228–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cannizzaro V, Berry LJ, Zosky GR, Turner DJ, Hantos Z, Sly PD. Impact of supplemental oxygen in mechanically ventilated adult and infant mice. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009;165:61–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Andrade PV, Dos Santos JM, Silva HC, Wilbert DD, Cavassani SS, Oliveira-Junior IS. Influence of hyperoxia and mechanical ventilation in lung inflammation and diaphragm function in aged versus adult rats. Inflammation. 2014;37:486–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Cavassani SS, Junqueira VB, Moraes JB, Luzo KK, Silva CM, Barros M, et al. Short courses of mechanical ventilation with high-O2 levels in elderly rat lungs. Acta Cir Bras. 2011;26:107–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Habre W, Petak F. Perioperative use of oxygen: variabilities across age. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:26–36.Google Scholar
  40. Asfar P, Singer M, Radermacher P. Understanding the benefits and harms of oxygen therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jan 30. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  41. Aboab J, Jonson B, Kouatchet A, Taille S, Niklason L, Brochard L. Effect of inspired oxygen fraction on alveolar derecruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1979–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Capellier G, Panwar R. Is it time for permissive hypoxaemia in the intensive care unit? Crit Care Resusc. 2011;13:139–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kapanci Y, Tosco R, Eggermann J, Gould VE. Oxygen pneumonitis in man. Light- and electron-microscopic morphometric studies. Chest. 1972;62:162–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith JL. The pathological effects due to increase of oxygen tension in the air breathed. J Physiol. 1899;24:19–35.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bak Z, Sjoberg F, Rousseau A, Steinvall I, Janerot-Sjoberg B. Human cardiovascular dose-response to supplemental oxygen. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2007;191:15–24.Google Scholar
  46. Floyd TF, Clark JM, Gelfand R, Detre JA, Ratcliffe S, Guvakov D, et al. Independent cerebral vasoconstrictive effects of hyperoxia and accompanying arterial hypocapnia at 1 ATA. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003;95:2453–61.Google Scholar
  47. Iscoe S, Beasley R, Fisher JA. Supplementary oxygen for nonhypoxemic patients: O2 much of a good thing? Crit Care. 2011;15:305.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Waring WS, Thomson AJ, Adwani SH, Rosseel AJ, Potter JF, Webb DJ, et al. Cardiovascular effects of acute oxygen administration in healthy adults. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003;42:245–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Calzia E, Asfar P, Hauser B, Matejovic M, Ballestra C, Radermacher P, et al. Hyperoxia may be beneficial. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:S559–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kemming GI, Meisner FG, Kleen M, Meier JM, Tillmanns J, Hutter JW, et al. Hyperoxic ventilation at the critical haematocrit. Resuscitation. 2003;56:289–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Helmerhorst HJF, Roos-Blom M-J, van Westerloo DJ, de Jonge E. Association between arterial hyperoxia and outcome in subsets of critical illness: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of cohort studies. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:1508–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Damiani E, Adrario E, Girardis M, Romano R, Pelaia P, Singer M, et al. Arterial hyperoxia and mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18:711.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Austin MA, Wills KE, Blizzard L, Walters EH, Wood-Baker R. Effect of high flow oxygen on mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in prehospital setting: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;341:c5462.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Perrin K, Wijesinghe M, Healy B, Wadsworth K, Bowditch R, Bibby S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of high concentration versus titrated oxygen therapy in severe exacerbations of asthma. Thorax. 2011;66:937–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Cameron L, Pilcher J, Weatherall M, Beasley R, Perrin K. The risk of serious adverse outcomes associated with hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia in acute exacerbations of COPD. Postgrad Med J. 2012;88:684–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. de Jonge E, Peelen L, Keijzers PJ, Joore H, de Lange D, van der Voort PH, et al. Association between administered oxygen, arterial partial oxygen pressure and mortality in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care. 2008;12:R156.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Eastwood G, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Taori G, Pilcher D, Young P, et al. Arterial oxygen tension and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:91–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Dell’Anna A, Lamanna I, Vincent JL, Taccone F. How much oxygen in adult cardiac arrest? Crit Care. 2014;18:555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Angelos MG, Milcarek B, Hunter K, et al. Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality. JAMA. 2010;303:2165–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Parrillo JE, Dellinger RP, Milcarek B, Hunter K, et al. Relationship between supranormal oxygen tension and outcome after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2011;123:2717–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Janz DR, Hollenbeck RD, Pollock JS, McPherson JA, Rice TW. Hyperoxia is associated with increased mortality in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia after sudden cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:3135–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Elmer J, Scutella M, Pullalarevu R, Wang B, Vaghasia N, Trzeciak S, et al. The association between hyperoxia and patient outcomes after cardiac arrest: analysis of a high-resolution database. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:49–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Bellomo R, Bailey M, Eastwood GM, Nichol A, Pilcher D, Hart GK, et al. Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2011;15:R90.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ihle JF, Bernard S, Bailey MJ, Pilcher DV, Smith K, Scheinkestel CD. Hyperoxia in the intensive care unit and outcome after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Crit Care Resusc. 2013;15:186–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Lee BK, Jeung KW, Lee HY, Lee SJ, Jung YH, Lee WK, et al. Association between mean arterial blood gas tension and outcome in cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:55–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Vaahersalo J, Bendel S, Reinikainen M, Kurola J, Tiainen M, Raj R, et al. Arterial blood gas tensions after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: associations with long-term neurologic outcome. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1463–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Spindelboeck W, Schindler O, Moser A, Hausler F, Wallner S, Strasser C, et al. Increasing arterial oxygen partial pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with improved rates of hospital admission. Resuscitation. 2013;84:770–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang CH, Chang WT, Huang CH, Tsai MS, Yu PH, Wang AY, et al. The effect of hyperoxia on survival following adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1142–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kuisma M, Boyd J, Voipio V, Alaspaa A, Roine RO, Rosenberg P. Comparison of 30 and the 100 % inspired oxygen concentrations during early post-resuscitation period: a randomised controlled pilot study. Resuscitation. 2006;69:199–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Eastwood GM, Young PJ, Bellomo R. The impact of oxygen and carbon dioxide management on outcome after cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20:266–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tan A, Schulze A, O’Donnell CP, Davis PG. Air versus oxygen for resuscitation of infants at birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD002273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Vento M. Oxygen for newborn resuscitation: how much is enough? Pediatrics. 2006;118:789–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Schmidt B, Whyte RK, Asztalos EV, Moddemann D, Poets C, Rabi Y, et al. Effects of targeting higher vs lower arterial oxygen saturations on death or disability in extremely preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309:2111–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Saugstad OD, Aune D. Optimal oxygenation of extremely low birth weight infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the oxygen saturation target studies. Neonatology. 2014;105:55–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Shuvy M, Atar D, Gabriel Steg P, Halvorsen S, Jolly S, Yusuf S, et al. Oxygen therapy in acute coronary syndrome: are the benefits worth the risk? Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1630–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Farquhar H, Weatherall M, Wijesinghe M, Perrin K, Ranchord A, Simmonds M, et al. Systematic review of studies of the effect of hyperoxia on coronary blood flow. Am Heart J. 2009;158:371–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wijesinghe M, Perrin K, Ranchord A, Simmonds M, Weatherall M, Beasley R. Routine use of oxygen in the treatment of myocardial infarction: systematic review. Heart. 2009;95:198–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S, Bray JE, Stephenson M, Cameron P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of oxygen therapy in acute myocardial infarction Air Verses Oxygen In myocarDial infarction study (AVOID Study). Am Heart J. 2012;163:339–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. AVOID Study: Air Versus Oxygen In ST-elevation MyocarDial Infarction. http://my.americanheart.org/idc/groups/ahamah-public/@wcm/@sop/@scon/documents/downloadable/ucm_469664.pdf. Accessed 01 Jun 2015.
  80. Ukholkina GB, Kostyanov IY, Kuchkina NV, Grendo EP, Gofman YB. Effect of oxygenotherapy used in combination with reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Kardiologiya. 2005;45:59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Ronning OM, Guldvog B. Should stroke victims routinely receive supplemental oxygen? A quasi-randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2033–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Ali K, Warusevitane A, Lally F, Sim J, Sills S, Pountain S, et al. The stroke oxygen pilot study: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of routine oxygen supplementation early after acute stroke - effect on key outcomes at six months. PLoS One. 2014;8:e59274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Quintard H, Patet C, Suys T, Marques-Vidal P, Oddo M. Normobaric hyperoxia is associated with increased cerebral excitotoxicity after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2015;22:243–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Jeon SB, Choi HA, Badjatia N, Schmidt JM, Lantigua H, Claassen J, et al. Hyperoxia may be related to delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:1301–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rincon F, Kang J, Maltenfort M, Vibbert M, Urtecho J, Athar MK, et al. Association between hyperoxia and mortality after stroke: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:387–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Rockswold SB, Rockswold GL, Zaun DA, Liu J. A prospective, randomized Phase II clinical trial to evaluate the effect of combined hyperbaric and normobaric hyperoxia on cerebral metabolism, intracranial pressure, oxygen toxicity, and clinical outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:1317–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Davis DP, Meade W, Sise MJ, Kennedy F, Simon F, Tominaga G, et al. Both hypoxemia and extreme hyperoxemia may be detrimental in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:2217–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Brenner M, Stein D, Hu P, Kufera J, Wooford M, Scalea T. Association between early hyperoxia and worse outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Arch Surg. 2012;147:1042–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Asher SR, Curry P, Sharma D, Wang J, O’Keefe GE, Daniel-Johnson J, et al. Survival advantage and PaO2 threshold in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2013;25:168–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Raj R, Bendel S, Reinikainen M, Kivisaari R, Siironen J, Lang M, et al. Hyperoxemia and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2013;17:R177.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Young P, Beasley R, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Eastwood GM, Nichol A, et al. The association between early arterial oxygenation and mortality in ventilated patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Crit Care Resusc. 2012;14:14–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Rincon F, Kang J, Vibbert M, Urtecho J, Athar MK, Jallo J. Significance of arterial hyperoxia and relationship with case fatality in traumatic brain injury: a multicentre cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:799–805.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Hovaguimian F, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Effect of intraoperative high inspired oxygen fraction on surgical site infection, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pulmonary function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:303–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Togioka B, Galvagno S, Sumida S, Murphy J, Ouanes JP, Wu C. The role of perioperative high inspired oxygen therapy in reducing surgical site infection: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:334–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Meyhoff CS, Jorgensen LN, Wetterslev J, Christensen KB, Rasmussen LS, Group PT. Increased long-term mortality after a high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction during abdominal surgery: follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:849–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Suzuki S, Eastwood GM, Glassford NJ, Peck L, Young H, Garcia-Alvarez M, et al. Conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot before-and-after trial. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1414–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Cooper Jr JA, Zitnik RJ, Matthay RA. Mechanisms of drug-induced pulmonary disease. Annu Rev Med. 1988;39:395–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Kallet RH, Matthay MA. Hyperoxic acute lung injury. Respir Care. 2013;58:123–41.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Halliwell B. The antioxidant paradox. Lancet. 2000;355:1179–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhang X, Shan P, Sasidhar M, Chupp GL, Flavell RA, Choi AM, et al. Reactive oxygen species and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase mediate hyperoxia-induced cell death in lung epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003;28:305–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Ahmad A, Ahmad S, Chang LY, Schaack J, White CW. Endothelial Akt activation by hyperoxia: role in cell survival. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40:1108–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Cho HY, Jedlicka AE, Reddy SP, Kensler TW, Yamamoto M, Zhang LY, et al. Role of NRF2 in protection against hyperoxic lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;26:175–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Franek WR, Morrow DM, Zhu H, Vancurova I, Miskolci V, Darley-Usmar K, et al. NF-kappaB protects lung epithelium against hyperoxia-induced nonapoptotic cell death-oncosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37:1670–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Lian X, Qin Y, Hossain SA, Yang L, White A, Xu H, et al. Overexpression of Stat3C in pulmonary epithelium protects against hyperoxic lung injury. J Immunol. 2005;174:7250–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Cramer T, Yamanishi Y, Clausen BE, Forster I, Pawlinski R, Mackman N, et al. HIF-1alpha is essential for myeloid cell-mediated inflammation. Cell. 2003;112:645–57.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Ward NS, Waxman AB, Homer RJ, Mantell LL, Einarsson O, Du Y, et al. Interleukin-6-induced protection in hyperoxic acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000;22:535–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Thebaud B, Ladha F, Michelakis ED, Sawicka M, Thurston G, Eaton F, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy increases survival, promotes lung angiogenesis, and prevents alveolar damage in hyperoxia-induced lung injury: evidence that angiogenesis participates in alveolarization. Circulation. 2005;112:2477–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Sue RD, Belperio JA, Burdick MD, Murray LA, Xue YY, Dy MC, et al. CXCR2 is critical to hyperoxia-induced lung injury. J Immunol. 2004;172:3860–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Reynolds PR, Schmitt RE, Kasteler SD, Sturrock A, Sanders K, Bierhaus A, et al. Receptors for advanced glycation end-products targeting protect against hyperoxia-induced lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010;42:545–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Gore A, Muralidhar M, Espey MG, Degenhardt K, Mantell LL. Hyperoxia sensing: from molecular mechanisms to significance in disease. J Immunotoxicol. 2010;7:239–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Patel VS, Sitapara RA, Gore A, Phan B, Sharma L, Sampat V, et al. High Mobility Group Box-1 mediates hyperoxia-induced impairment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clearance and inflammatory lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013;48:280–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Nelskyla A, Parr MJ, Skrifvars MB. Prevalence and factors correlating with hyperoxia exposure following cardiac arrest - an observational single centre study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:35.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Minana G, Nunez J, Banuls P, Sanchis J, Nunez E, Robles R, et al. Prognostic implications of arterial blood gases in acute decompensated heart failure. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22:489–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Ranchord AM, Argyle R, Beynon R, Perrin K, Sharma V, Weatherall M, et al. High-concentration versus titrated oxygen therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2012;163:168–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Sutton AD, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Eastwood GM, Pilcher DV. The association between early arterial oxygenation in the ICU and mortality following cardiac surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42:730–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Zughaft D, Bhiladvala P, Van Dijkman A, Harnek J, Madsen Hardig B, Bjork J, et al. The analgesic effect of oxygen during percutaneous coronary intervention (the OXYPAIN Trial). Acute Card Care. 2013;15:63–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Roffe C, Ali K, Warusevitane A, Sills S, Pountain S, Allen M, et al. The SOS pilot study: a RCT of routine oxygen supplementation early after acute stroke - effect on recovery of neurological function at one week. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19113.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Singhal AB, Benner T, Roccatagliata L, Koroshetz WJ, Schaefer PW, Lo EH, et al. A pilot study of normobaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:797–802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Stolmeijer R, ter Maaten JC, Zijlstra JG, Ligtenberg JJ. Oxygen therapy for sepsis patients in the emergency department: a little less? Eur J Emerg Med. 2014;21:233–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Helmerhorst et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.