Skip to main content
Download PDF

Trigger mechanisms of secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients

Critical Care volume 19, Article number: 131 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

In recent years the development of secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP) has increasingly been perceived as a separate disease entity. About possible trigger mechanisms of SSC-CIP has been speculated, systematic investigations on this issue are still lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and influence of promoting factors.

Methods

Temporality, consistency and biological plausibility are essential prerequisites for causality. In this study, we investigated the temporality and consistency of possible triggers of SSC-CIP in a large case series. Biological plausibility of the individual triggers is discussed in a scientific context. SSC-CIP cases were recruited retrospectively from 2633 patients who underwent or were scheduled for liver transplantation at the University Hospital Charité, Berlin. All patients who developed secondary sclerosing cholangitis in association with intensive care treatment were included. Possible trigger factors during the course of the initial intensive care treatment were recorded.

Results

Sixteen patients (68% males, mean age 45.87 ± 14.64 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of SSC-CIP were identified. Of the 19 risk factors investigated, particularly severe hypotension with a prolonged decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) to <65 mmHg and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were established as possible triggers of SSC-CIP. The occurrence of severe hypotension appears to be the first and most significant step in the pathogenesis. It seems that severe hypotension has a critical effect on the blood supply of bile ducts when it occurs together with additional microcirculatory disturbances.

Conclusions

In critically ill patients with newly acquired cholestasis the differential diagnosis of SSC-CIP should be considered when they have had an episode of haemodynamic instability with a prolonged decrease in MAP, initial need for large amounts of blood transfusions or colloids, and early development of a SIRS.

Introduction

Medical and technical progress in critical care medicine has increased survival rates of patients with life-threatening injuries. However, as critically ill patients survive more often, new ICU-acquired diseases have emerged. Recent years have seen increasing reports of a new entity of ICU-associated diseases. The development of a secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP) was first observed in patients suffering burns or polytrauma, but subsequently also following other acute life-threatening events [1-4]. SSC-CIP is characterized by cholestasis and bile duct necrosis, and can be diagnosed on the basis of typical cholangiographic findings. It appears to be irreversible and progresses rapidly to biliary cirrhosis and liver failure. Without exception, the medical history of all reported patients with SSC-CIP revealed previous intensive care treatment [1-4]. There is no doubt that the triggers of SSC-CIP are to be found in the time window between the life-threatening initial event and the occurrence of cholestasis. Whether the disease is caused by the initial injury itself or by the intensive care treatment is not yet clear. Therapeutic options for SSC-CIP are limited, the mortality rate during initial ICU stay is high and many surviving patients have to undergo liver transplantation. If ICU-associated causes could be identified, appropriate avoidance strategies might help prevent the development of SSC-CIP. Currently available reports speculate on a range of possible causes of SSC-CIP – such as sepsis, high-dose catecholamines and ischemia [2,3]. However, specific studies are lacking. Up to now, no studies have examined which of the suspected triggers can, in fact, be verified in patients with SSC-CIP. The aim of the present study was to identify and evaluate possible trigger factors of SSC-CIP.

Material and methods

Records of patients who received (2,473) or were listed for (160) orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), at the Charité University Hospital Berlin between 1 January 1990 and 8 May 2011 were carefully reviewed. A total of 16 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SSC-CIP were identified. The diagnosis of SSC-CIP was based on typical findings on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), such as the presence of casts or destruction of intrahepatic bile duct branches. Other causes of cholestasis were excluded by comprehensive differential diagnostic examinations. Additionally, liver histology was available in 11 patients. At the time of data collection, 9 of the 16 patients had already been transplanted, 5 were still on the waiting list, and 2 had died while still on the waiting list. As tertiary care centres the Departments of Transplantation Surgery and Gastroenterology receive patients for liver transplantation as well as for endoscopic or percutaneous biliary interventions from various other hospitals. Therefore, most of our patients underwent initial intensive care treatment at outside hospitals. The records of these patients’ initial hospital treatment elsewhere were reviewed in detail for specific risk factors including: presence and duration of severe hypotension, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, use of colloidal solutions, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)/sepsis, antibiotic treatment, positive cultures prior to cholestasis, number of days of mechanical ventilation prior to the development of cholestasis, total duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilation strategies with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) >10 cm H2O, a paO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg, use of vasopressors/inotropes (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine), anaesthetic agents (propofol, midazolam, ketamine, sufentanil) and signs of tissue damage. The list included all risk factors capable of destroying the bile duct directly or indirectly. Only those risk factors presenting prior to the onset of cholestasis were recorded. The occurrence of cholestasis was interpreted as indicative of incipient bile duct destruction. The onset of cholestasis was defined as an increase in cholestatic parameters (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bilirubin) to more than twice the upper normal limit. Severe hypotension was defined as a sustained (≥60 minutes) mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of less than 65 mmHg requiring fluid and/or catecholamine administration. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations of the mean. For all vasopressors/inotropes administered, both the mean doses and the peak doses were recorded. Mean dose: calculated from total amount administered prior to cholestasis onset, administration time prior to cholestasis and body weight (expressed in μg · kg−1 · min−1). Peak dose: transitory maximum dose in μg · kg−1 · min−1. Doses were defined as low dose <0.05 μg · kg−1 · min−1, medium dose = 0.05 to 0.2 or high dose >0.2 μg · kg−1 · min−1.

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Charité, and all surviving patients gave their written informed consent to having their data recorded.

Results

The mean age of the patients (eleven men and five women) at the time of diagnosis was 46 ± 14.6 years (median 48 years, range 18 to 63). All 16 patients had a history of intensive care treatment necessitated by a prior life-threatening event. A summary of the life-threatening events/causes for admission to ICU and demographic data are shown in Table 1. None of the patients had a previous history of liver or bile duct diseases, and had unremarkable liver function tests on admission to ICU. During intensive care treatment, all patients developed elevated liver enzymes of a cholestatic pattern. In 14 of the patients, liver enzymes were checked regularly during the first 10 days, and cholestasis was diagnosed after a mean of 7.86 ± 2.98 days (median seven days). In two patients, liver enzymes were first determined on day 12 and 18, respectively.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics
Full size table

The data regarding the 19 trigger factors investigated are summarised in Figure 1 and Table 2. Between the initial event and the onset of cholestasis all patients experienced an episode of severe haemodynamic instability with a decrease in MAP to below 65 mm Hg lasting for at least 60 minutes, often more than 120 minutes. A later occurrence of this haemodynamic instability after the initial event correlated with a later increase in cholestasis parameters. The onset of cholestasis was most closely time-related to the risk factor ‘severe hypotension’ and the interval between hypotension and cholestasis showed the smallest standard deviation (1.44). The onset of cholestasis correlated less closely with the initiation of ventilation or the onset of SIRS, and least closely with the initial life-threatening event (Figures 2 and 3). Severe hypotension cannot be considered as a consequence of sepsis, since 14/16 patients had the episode of haemodynamic instability some days prior to the onset of SIRS/sepsis (1.8 ± 1.2 days) (Figure 4).

Figure 1
figure 1

Ischemia and toxic bile-related risk factors. CK, creatine kinase; PEEP, positive end–expiratory pressure; RBC, red blood cells; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Full size image
Table 2 Risk factors (prior to cholestasis) in 16 cases with SSC-CIP
Full size table
Figure 2
figure 2

Onset of cholestasis following impact of several risk factors. (initial injury, mechanical ventilation, severe hypotension, SIRS). SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Boxplot –Time interval between several risk factors (initial injury, mechanical ventilation, severe hypotension, SIRS) and onset of cholestasis. SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4

Chronological sequence of severe hypotension and SIRS. SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Full size image

All patients needed vasopressors and/or inotropes to stabilise the circulation. The doses required are shown in Table 3. In total, 81% of the patients received norepinephrine and 25% epinephrine. Between hospital admission and cholestasis onset 13 patients required transfusions (mean 11.7 ± 7.55 units; range 2 to 26; median 10) and 81% required colloidal solutions (hydroxyethyl starch 6% or 10%; Gelafusine 4%) to stabilise the circulatory system. Taken together, all 16 patients received either RBCs or colloids to support systemic perfusion. Prior to the onset of cholestasis all 16 patients underwent mechanical ventilation. The duration of ventilation prior to cholestasis was a mean 7.4 ± 2.4 days (median 7 days). Ventilation strategies with a PEEP >10 cm H2O were applied in 8/16 patients. A PaO2/FiO2 ratio <150 mm Hg persisting for several hours was observed in 7/16 patients. Laboratory investigations revealed signs of tissue damage (elevated creatine kinase or myoglobin) in 12 of 16 patients. According to the criteria of the Consensus Conference Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine [5] all 16 patients (100%) met the SIRS criteria within the period between initial injury and cholestasis onset, specifically all 16 patients met at least two criteria and 6 patients met three criteria. During that time period, only one patient had positive blood cultures, 8/16 patients had pathogens in the tracheal secretion, 1/16 patient had a positive wound swab, and 1/16 patient had pathogens in the urine and on the tip of the central venous catheter. The most common microorganism isolated was Escherichia coli, which was found in three patients. All 16 patients received antibiotic treatment, which was initiated as calculated antibiosis. Ten different classes of antibiotics and 19 different single substances were applied. Prior to the onset of cholestasis, changes of therapy were made in 13 patients due to lack of clinical response. The majority of patients received two different antibiotics. Broad-spectrum cephalosporins (n = 10) were the antibiotics most frequently prescribed, followed by acylaminopenicillins (n = 7) and fluoroquinolones (n = 7). Antibiotics were administered for a mean of 6 ± 2.9 days (range 2 to 12, median 5 days) prior to the onset of cholestasis. In our cohort, 75% of the patients received TPN prior to cholestasis onset. The duration of TPN prior to cholestasis onset was very short – a mean of 5.33 ± 2.9 days (range 2 to 13, median 5 days).

Table 3 Mean and peak doses of vasopressors/inotropes used
Full size table

Discussion

Besides critical illness polyneuropathy, secondary sclerosing cholangitis is one of the complications of severe critical illness and its successful management. SSC-CIP is an important cause of unexplained acute liver failure in ICU patients and contributes to poor outcome. In SSC-CIP, critical illness or its intensive care management can convert healthy bile ducts into severely destructed ducts within only a few days. This bile duct damage is initiated within the first seven days of ICU admission. A number of risk factors are under discussion, including shock/arterial hypotension, high-dose vasopressor therapy, sepsis, total parenteral nutrition and ventilation strategies with PEEP >10 cm H2O.

However, the question remains, which of these risk factors play a role as drivers of bile duct damage in SSC-CIP? Following the Hill criteria, the potential risk factors should be:

  1. 1.

    Present prior to the onset of cholestasis (temporality),

  2. 2.

    Common to all patients with this problem (consistency), and

  3. 3.

    Biologically plausible, i.e. capable of driving the pathogenesis to “toxic bile” or to “ischemic cholangiopathy” (plausibility) [6].

Based on a review of the current literature, our study is the first large case series to specifically investigate the suspected causes of SSC-CIP and their biological plausibility. Further larger prospective studies are needed to settle these issues. Proof of temporality, consistency and plausibility is a sine qua non condition for investigation of the causal mechanisms using other study designs. Our data provide the basis for future research. We started from the hypothesis that only those triggers of SSC-CIP that are consistently observed in all SSC-CIP patients should be seriously considered.

Bile duct destruction in SSC-CIP appears to be the consequence of a single event, during which a large number of cholangiocytes are damaged directly and irreversibly. Direct damage to the cholangiocytes can be induced by either ischemia/hypoxia or by the detergent properties of so-called ‘toxic bile’. Ischemia and ‘toxic bile’ are conceivable as two underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of SSC-CIP.

Concept of ischemic cholangiopathy

In contrast to hepatocytes, which have a dual blood supply, the biliary epithelium is supplied exclusively via the hepatic arteries. In consequence, the biliary epithelium is much more susceptible to ischemia than hepatocytes. Prior to the late 1960s, ischemic cholangiopathy was virtually unknown, and our clinical information on ischemia-induced bile duct lesions is based almost solely on experience with liver transplantation [7]. Early after liver transplantation, interruption of the arterial blood supply (for example, by hepatic artery thrombosis), results in bile duct necrosis. Further support for the concept of ischemic cholangiopathy came from observations in the 1980s, showing that the administration of floxuridine in the hepatic artery results in bile duct necrosis and sclerosing cholangitis [8,9]. Ischemic necrosis of biliary epithelium can occur when the blood supply to the bile ducts is disturbed at the level of either the macro-circulation (that is, the branches of the hepatic artery), or of the micro-circulation (that is, the vascular network exclusively supplying the bile ducts, the peribiliary plexus (PBP)).

Concept of ‘toxic bile’

In the absence of protective mechanisms, the detergent properties of hydrophobic bile acids would immediately destroy the lipid cellular membrane of cholangiocytes. One important protective mechanism is hepatocellular secretion of phospholipids (via the transporter phospholipid export pump MDR3), which form protective mixed micelles with bile acids. In addition, the biliary secretion of HCO3 − (via the transporter anion exchanger 2 (AE2)) results in the formation of a protective alkaline HCO3 −-film on the apical cholangiocyte membrane; this is assumed to be part of the defence strategy [10]. A finely-tuned balance between bile acids and protective mechanisms is imperative for the integrity of the bile duct epithelia. Thus, disturbance of this equilibrium results in severe damage to the biliary epithelium and leads to sclerosing cholangitis [11-14]. Such an imbalance can result from alterations of the hepatobiliary transporter system.

Drivers of the concept of ischemic cholangiopathy in our patients

In our SSC patients, several factors in the intensive care setting were capable of compromising the arterial blood supply to the bile ducts. These include states of shock with decreased MAP, the use of catecholamines, mechanical ventilation, ventilation strategies with high PEEP, paO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg and disturbances of the microcirculation.

Macrocirculatory disturbances as drivers of ischemic cholangiopathy

In the case of an incipient circulatory collapse with arterial hypotension, deterioration of the hepatic perfusion with subsequent alterations of the biliary blood supply is to be expected because the perfusion of the liver can be maintained by autoregulation only to a limited extent [15]. All of our 16 patients initially survived an episode of severe haemodynamic instability with a decrease in MAP to <65 mmHg. The later this hypotensive episode occurred during the treatment course, the later cholestasis appeared. Shock states with decreased arterial pressure are common in ICU patients – according to reports in the literature up to 58% of ICU patients are affected [16]. In comparison, the rate of 100% in our series was very high, supporting a possible role of severe hypotension in the initiation of the pathogenesis. When fluid administration fails to restore adequate systemic pressure in such a clinical situation with a critical blood pressure decrease, treatment with vasoactive agents is initiated. Therefore, all 16 of our patients required vasopressors and/or inotropes. However, since the increase in systemic blood pressure does not always correlate with improved hepatosplanchnic perfusion, prolonged liver ischemia can be masked. Commonly used agents, such as epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine and dobutamine, all increase systemic blood pressure, but have different effects on hepatosplanchnic blood flow. Dopamine not only increases the mesenteric blood flow, but apparently also has a positive effect on liver perfusion [17]. Only 2 of our 16 patients received dopamine. In contrast, epinephrine and norepinephrine have a dose-dependent negative effect on the perfusion of visceral organs. On account of its vasoconstrictive properties, norepinephrine has the potential to decrease splanchnic blood flow. Epinephrine, in particular, is known for its disadvantageous effect on splanchnic perfusion in septic patients [18,19]. In our series, norepinephrine was the most frequently used vasopressor (13/16 patients), and epinephrine was used only rarely (4/16 patients); one patient received neither drug. The maximum dose of epinephrine or norepinephrine exceeded 0.2 μg · kg−1 · min−1 in the minority of patients (5/16). The majority of patients received catecholamines in the medium or low-dose range. Neither in the epinephrine (E) nor in the norepinephrine (NE) group was the mean continuously administered dose (MCAD) within the high-dose range (>0.2 μg · kg−1 · min−1); in both groups, the MCAD was mostly in the range below 0.1 μg · kg−1 · min−1 (E: n = 2/4, NE: n = 12/13). Overall, our results do not support the earlier assumption that high-dose catecholamines play a decisive role in the pathogenesis of SSC-CIP.

Microcirculatory disturbances as drivers of ischemic cholangiopathy

As is known from experimental models, ischemic bile duct damage increases as the size of occluded arteries decreases [20-22]. This indicates that microcirculatory disturbances involving the peribiliary plexus are of particular clinical significance. The question as to why SSC-CIP occurs much more often in surgical patients has yet to be answered. Two-thirds of all published cases of SSC-CIP were patients with trauma, burns or major surgery. Also in our group, 13 of the 16 cases had surgery-requiring primary diseases (Table 1). Polytrauma or extensive surgery is usually accompanied by extensive tissue damage. Clinical studies show that this tissue damage can be an initiator of a hypercoagulable state [23-28]. This might well contribute to occlusion of the peribiliary plexus. Ischemic bile duct damage has frequently been found in a number of conditions known to be associated with hypercoagulopathy, such as the antiphospholipid syndrome, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, Schönlein-Henoch purpura or systemic lupus [29-33]. Other important factors affecting the microcirculation are increased blood viscosity and red cell aggregation. Trauma, burns and major surgery are all conditions that may increase plasma viscosity. Furthermore, extensive muscle destruction, electric power accidents and post-ischemic syndrome are often associated with a marked release of myoglobin (crush syndrome) which can result in an increase in blood viscosity, as shown in animal experiments [34]. However, the infusion of colloidal solutions, such as hydroxyethyl starch (HES), can also increase whole blood viscosity [35,36]. HES is also one of the components of the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, used in the preservation of donor livers for transplantation. Unfavourable effects of this solution on blood flow through the peribiliary plexus have been reported in clinical studies, and are supported by experimental data [37,38]. In recent years, it became clear that there are risks of RBC transfusion related to RBC storage effects. Stored RBCs adhere to the endothelium or lose their deformability, resulting in obstruction of the microcirculation. Increased mortality rates associated with RBC transfusion have been reported in cardiac surgery patients and after liver transplantation [39-41]. Of our patients, 81% (13/16) received blood transfusions prior to onset of cholestasis. This is a very high proportion compared to the percentage (45%) generally reported in ICU patients [42,43]. Increased blood viscosity caused by colloids or myoglobin release, RBC transfusion and hypercoagulable states are among the factors determining microcirculatory blood flow through the PBP. All 16 patients had at least one of these factors – often several simultaneously – prior to the onset of cholestasis. These observations suggest that apart from severe hypotension, additional microcirculatory disturbances may be involved in the pathogenesis of SSC. Possibly, severe hypotension may have bile duct implications only when it occurs in combination with additional microcirculatory disturbances.

Mechanical ventilation as driver of ischemic cholangiopathy

Experimental studies indicate that mechanical ventilation with high PEEP for lung-protective purposes has negative effects on the microcirculation in the gastrointestinal tract [44]. Based on these studies, it was suspected, that, in particular, a high PEEP contributes to biliary ischemia, and that patients with a low oxygenation index are at risk of developing SSC-CIP [2]. Our results demonstrate that the development of SSC-CIP is not conclusively associated with a PEEP >10 cm H2O or a PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg. However, this does not exclude the possibility that mechanical ventilation itself might be of significance, since all cases of SSC-CIP described in the literature as well as our own 16 patients, received mechanical ventilation.

Drivers of the ‘toxic bile concept’ in our patients

All of our patients were exposed to several risk factors potentially leading to biliary injury via ‘toxic bile’ effects mediated through alterations of the hepatobiliary transporters. These risk factors include SIRS/sepsis, ischemia, high-dose propofol, antimicrobial agents and total parenteral nutrition.

SIRS/sepsis could be a driver of ‘toxic bile’ in SSC-CIP

Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1 or IL-6 down-regulate the function and/or expression of hepatobiliary transporters. Animal models indicate, for example, that the canalicular bilirubin-conjugate-export pump (MRP2) is sensitive to cytokines and that the mRNA of the bile salt export pump (BSEP) is down-regulated under the influence of inflammatory mediators [45-47]. These data have been confirmed in human hepatocytes [48]. However, data regarding the phospholipid export pump (MDR3) are not conclusive, but some suggest a decrease in its hepatic expression in experimental inflammation models [47,49]. At the biliary transporter level, pro-inflammatory cytokines inhibit the activity of the anion exchanger AE2 [50]. In the clinical setting, the development of SIRS reflects cytokine release. Such cases of SIRS developed in all of our patients prior to cholestasis. SIRS is a common finding in patients in the ICU, usually occurring in 68% of the cases [51]. By comparison, the 100% incidence of SIRS in our group was exceptionally high. Therefore, if plausibility, temporality and consistency (Hill criteria) are given, SIRS could play a role in triggering SSC-CIP. Our patients exhibited signs of SIRS within 4.4 ± 2.9 days of ICU admission (range 2 to 11, median 3 days). However, up to this point, a pathogen was isolated in only 10/16 patients. Thus, infections do not adequately explain the development of SIRS in our patients. The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines is not limited to bacterial infections, but is also triggered by trauma, severe burns, cardiac surgery and other major surgery [52]. Moreover, prolonged hypotension or shock can also induce SIRS via generalised tissue ischemia [53]. In 14 of our 16 patients SIRS was preceded by severe hypotension, which could explain the non-infectious SIRS in our series.

Ischemia/hypoxia could be a driver of ‘toxic bile’ in SSC-CIP

All 16 patients in our study had experienced an episode of severe hypotension. Experimental data suggest that ischemia/hypoxia can also down-regulate hepatobiliary transporters [54].

High-dose propofol seems not to be a driver of ‘toxic bile’ in SSC-CIP

Propofol, which is commonly used for sedation in ICU patients, is thought to influence hepatobiliary transporters via the release of cytokines. While high-dose propofol (5 to 10 mg kg−1 h−1) increases serum levels of TNF-α and IL-10 after haemorrhagic shock, low-dose propofol (1 mg kg−1 h−1) decreases them [55]. Since only one of our patients received high-dose propofol, this mechanism played no key role in our patients.

Total parenteral nutrition seems not to be a driver of ‘toxic bile in SSC-CIP

Clinical studies have shown that prolonged parenteral nutrition can trigger cholestasis. In a mouse model the expression and function of the canalicular phospholipid flippase (Mdr2) significantly decreased under the influence of TPN [56]. However, 25% of our patients did not receive TPN prior to the onset of cholestasis. In the 75% with prior TPN, the average TPN duration was very short (five days). In contrast, TPN-induced cholestasis usually occurred only after two to three weeks of therapy. Likewise, the results of a multicentre study by Grau et al. showed no impairment of liver function within the first six days of TPN [57]. In the light of these findings we do not attribute any major role to TPN in the pathogenesis of SSC-CIP in our patients.

Antimicrobial agents/antibiotics seem not to be a driver of ‘toxic bile’ in SSC-CIP

Inhibitory effects of antimicrobial substances, such as rifampicin and fusidate, on the function of hepatobiliary transporters have been reported [58,59]. In a recent study by Yosikado et al. itraconazole was shown to inhibit MDR3-mediated efflux of phospholipids in vitro and led to itraconazole-induced cholestatic liver injury in vivo [60]. Although all of our patients received antibiotic therapy, the spectrum of the substances was so heterogeneous that a common pathogenetic pathway appears improbable.

Other possible causes

Anaesthetic agents could be drivers for SSC-CIP

A number of cases of ketamine-induced cholangiopathies were recently reported [61-63]. A large proportion of our patients (15/16) received ketamine prior to the onset of cholestasis, and it cannot be excluded that this had an unfavourable effect on the course of the illness.

Prevalence of SSC-CIP

The true prevalence of SSC-CIP is hard to estimate since the disease still is not well known and is thus under-diagnosed in many areas. Systematic reporting of diagnosed cases is also lacking. Unfortunately, our method of data collection is not capable of calculating valid SSC-CIP prevalence rates. Of all liver transplantations in our centre, 0.61% (16/2633) were due to SSC-CIP. Similar rates have been observed, for example, in patients with hemochromatosis (0.7% of all liver transplantations at our centre). This allows the assumption that SSC-CIP is – similar to hemochromatosis– rare in the general population. But this is not the case with critically ill patients. In our experience, SSC-CIP seems to occur more frequently at trauma or cardiac surgery ICUs than in the internal medicine ICU. We found 5 cases of SSC-CIP in a total of 9951 ICU cases at one trauma ICU (1 SSC-CIP/1,990 ICU-cases). It must be assumed that these figures underestimate the actual number of cases. It is known that 50% of ICU patients die of SSC-CIP at an early stage of intensive care, before the diagnosis is established [64]. A better understanding of SSC-CIP and registers for systematic reporting of the disease could clarify the epidemiology of secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients in the future.

Conclusions

With regard to temporality, consistency and plausibility, the following potential triggers might contribute to the development of SSC-CIP: severe hypotension, microcirculatory disturbances and SIRS/sepsis. Further clinical and experimental studies can build on and consolidate these results. Severe hypotension, microcirculatory disturbances and SIRS/sepsis may act in concert to induce damage to the bile ducts. While severe hypotension can cause direct ischemic bile duct damage, it might also contribute indirectly to destruction by altering hepatobiliary transporters. Although both severe hypotension and SIRS/sepsis can individually affect hepatobiliary transporters, their effects might possibly be potentiated in combination. In summary, it appears that severe hypotension/shock is the first step in the pathogenesis of SSC-CIP. While more recent investigations show that hypoxic hepatitis can no longer be termed as ‘shock liver’, the development of SSC-CIP could represent the actual response of the liver to shock.

Key messages

  • SSC-CIP is triggered by severe haemodynamic instability with a prolonged decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP).

  • Apparently, this decrease in arterial pressure contributes to critical perfusion of the peribiliary plexus only if additional microcirculatory disturbances (colloids, RBCs, hypercoagulable state, increased plasma viscosity) exist.

  • Non-infectious SIRS could be an additional cause of SSC-CIP.

  • Neither high-dose catecholamines nor total parenteral nutrition (TPN) plays a decisive role in triggering SSC-CIP.

Abbreviations

AE2:

anion exchanger 2

ALP:

alkaline phosphatase

CK:

creatine kinase

COPD:

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ERC:

endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

GGT:

gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

HES:

hydroxyethyl starch

ICU:

intensive care unit

IL-1:

−6 or 10, interleukin- 1, −6 or 10

MAP:

mean arterial pressure

Mdr2:

multidrug resistance protein 2

MDR3:

multidrug resistance protein 3, phospholipid export pump

MRP2:

multidrug resistance- associated protein 2, conjugate export pump

PBP:

peribiliary plexus

PEEP:

positive end-expiratory pressure

PSC:

primary sclerosing cholangitis

RBC:

red blood cells

SSC-CIP:

secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients

SIRS:

systemic inflammatory response syndrome

TNF-α:

tumor necrosis factor α

TPN:

total parenteral nutrition

References

  1. Schmitt M, Kölbel CB, Müller MK, Verbeke CS, Singer MV. Sclerosing cholangitis after burn injury. Z Gastroenterol. 1997;35:929–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gelbmann CM, Rümmele P, Wimmer M, Hofstädter F, Göhlmann B, Endlicher E, et al. Ischemic-like cholangiopathy with secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1221–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Engler S, Elsing C, Flechtenmacher C, Theilmann L, Stremmel W, Stiehl A. Progressive sclerosing cholangitis after septic shock: a new variant of vanishing bile duct disorders. Gut. 2003;52:688–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaeger C, Mayer G, Henrich R, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, May A, et al. Secondary sclerosing cholangitis after long-term treatment in an intensive care unit: clinical presentation, endoscopic findings, treatment, and follow-up. Endoscopy. 2006;38:730–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guide-lines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:864–74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hill AB. The environment and disease. Association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sherlock S. Chronic cholangitides: aetiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Br Med J. 1968;3:515–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hohn D, Melnick J, Stagg R, Altman D, Friedman M, Ignoffo R, et al. Biliary sclerosis in patients receiving hepatic arterial infusions of floxuridine. J Clin Oncol. 1985;3:98–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludwig J, Kim CH, Wiesner RH, Krom RA. Floxuridine-induced sclerosing cholangitis: an ischemic cholangiopathy? Hepatology. 1989;9:215–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beuers U, Hohenester S, de Buy Wenniger LJ, Kremer AE, Jansen PL, Elferink RP. The biliary HCO(3)(−) umbrella: a unifying hypothesis on pathogenetic and therapeutic aspects of fibrosing cholangiopathies. Hepatology. 2010;52:1489–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smit JJ, Schinkel AH, Oude Elferink RP, Groen AK, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, et al. Homozygous disruption of the murine mdr2 P-glycoprotein gene leads to a complete absence of phospholipid from bile and to liver disease. Cell. 1993;75:451–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mauad TH, van Nieuwkerk CM, Dingemans KP, Smit JJ, Schinkel AH, Notenboom RG, et al. Mice with homozygous disruption of the mdr2 P-glycoprotein gene. A novel animal model for studies of nonsuppurative inflammatory cholangitis and hepato-carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1994;145:1237–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Popov Y, Patsenker E, Fickert P, Trauner M, Schuppan D. Mdr2 (Abcb4)−/− mice spontaneously develop severe biliary fibrosis via massive dysregulation of pro- and antifibrogenic genes. J Hepatol. 2005;43:1045–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strazzabosco M, Spirlì C, Okolicsanyi L. Pathophysiology of the intrahepatic biliary epithelium. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:244–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lautt WW. Regulatory processes interacting to maintain hepatic blood flow constancy: vascular compliance, hepatic arterial buffer response, hepatorenal reflex, liver regeneration, escape from vasoconstriction. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:891–903.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahloul M, Samet M, Chaari A, Ben Aljia N, Ben Mbarek MN, Chelly H, et al. Use Of catecholamines for shock. a continuous debate! Tunis Med. 2012;90:291–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hiltebrand LB, Krejci V, Sigurdsson GH. Effects of dopamine, dobutamine, and dopexamine on microcirculatory blood flow in the gastrointestinal tract during sepsis and anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1188–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meier-Hellmann A, Reinhart K, Bredle DL, Specht M, Spies CD, Hannemann L. Epinephrine impairs splanchnic perfusion in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:399–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martikainen TJ, Tenhunen JJ, Giovannini I, Uusaro A, Ruokonen E. Epinephrine induces tissue perfusion deficit in porcine endotoxin shock: evaluation by regional CO(2) content gradients and lactate-to-pyruvate ratios. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;288:G586–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deltenre P, Valla DC. Ischemic cholangiopathy. J Hepatol. 2006;44:806–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonomura T. Optimal size of embolic material in transcatheter arterial embolization of the liver. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1994;54:489–99. Japanese.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doppman JL, Dunnick NR, Girton M, Fauci AS, Popovsky MA. Bile duct cysts secondary to liver infarcts: report of a case and experimental production by small vessel hepatic artery occlusion. Radiology. 1979;130:1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Differding JA, Underwood SJ, Van PY, Khaki RA, Spoerke NJ, Schreiber MA. Trauma induces a hypercoagulable state that is resistant to hypothermia as measured by thrombelastogram. Am J Surg. 2011;201:587–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brohi K, Cohen MJ, Ganter MT, Schultz MJ, Levi M, Mackersie RC, et al. Acute coagulopathy of trauma: hypoperfusion induces systemic anticoagulation and hyperfibrinolysis. J Trauma. 2008;64:1211–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Floccard B, Rugeri L, Faure A, Saint Denis M, Boyle EM, Peguet O, et al. Early coagulopathy in trauma patients: an on-scene and hospital admission study. Injury. 2012;43:26–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hunt BJ, Parratt RN, Segal HC, Sheikh S, Kallis P, Yacoub M. Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis during cardiothoracic operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:712–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stahl RL, Duncan A, Hooks MA, Henderson JM, Millikan WJ, Warren WD. A hypercoagulable state follows orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1990;12:553–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lison S, Weiss G, Spannagl M, Heindl B. Postoperative changes in procoagulant factors after major surgery. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2011;22:190–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kirby DF, Blei AT, Rosen ST, Vogelzang RL, Neiman HL. Primary sclerosing cholangitis in the presence of a lupus anticoagulant. Am J Med. 1986;81:1077–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Viola S, Meyer M, Fabre M, Tounian P, Goddon R, Dechelotte P, et al. Ischemic necrosis of bile ducts complicating Schönlein-Henoch purpura. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:211–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Le Thi HD, Valla D, Franco D, Wechsler B, De Gramont A, Auperin A, et al. Cholangitis associated with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: another instance of ischemic cholangiopathy? Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1338–43.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lamy P, Valla D, Bourgeois P, Rueff B, Benhamou JP. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1988;12:962–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Audan A, Bruley Des Varannes S, Georgelin T, Sagan C, Cloarec D, Serraz H, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1995;19:123–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chernysheva GA, Plotnikov MB, Smol’yakova VI, Avdoshin AD, Saratikov AS, Sutormina TG. Relationship between rheological and hemodynamic changes in rats with crush syndrome. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2000;130:1048–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Walker AM, Lee K, Dobson GM, Johnston CR. The viscous behaviour of HES 130/0.4 (Voluven®) and HES 260/0.45 (Pentaspan®). Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:288–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Neff TA, Fischler L, Mark M, Stocker R, Reinhart WH. The influence of two different hydroxyethyl starch solutions (6% HES 130/0.4 and 200/0.5) on blood viscosity. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1773–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Heidenhain C, Pratschke J, Puhl G, Neumann U, Pascher A, Veltzke-Schlieker W, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for ischemic-type biliary lesions following orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2010;23:14–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moench C, Moench K, Lohse AW, Thies J, Otto G. Prevention of ischemic-type biliary lesions by arterial back-table pressure perfusion. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:285–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. de Morais BS, Sanches MD, Ribeiro DD, Lima AS, de Abreu Ferrari TC, Duarte MM, et al. Association between the use of blood components and the five-year mortality after liver transplant. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011;61:286–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ramos E, Dalmau A, Sabate A, Lama C, Llado L, Figueras J, et al. Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion in liver transplantation: influence on patient outcome, prediction of requirements, and measures to reduce them. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:1320–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Bommel J, de Korte D, Lind A, Siegemund M, Trouwborst A, Verhoeven AJ, et al. The effect of the transfusion of stored RBCs on intestinal microvascular oxygenation in the rat. Transfusion. 2001;41:1515–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, Fink MP, Levy MM, Abraham E, et al. The CRIT Study: anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill–current clinical practice in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:39–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, Gattinoni L, Thijs L, Webb A, et al. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288:1499–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fujita Y. Effects of PEEP on splanchnic hemodynamics and blood volume. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993;37:427–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kubitz R, Wettstein M, Warskulat U, Häussinger D. Regulation of the multidrug resistance protein 2 in the rat liver by lipopolysaccharide and dexamethasone. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:401–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Trauner M, Arrese M, Soroka CJ, Ananthanarayanan M, Koeppel TA, Schlosser SF, et al. The rat canalicular conjugate export pump (Mrp2) is down–regulated in intrahepatic and obstructive cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:255–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vos TA, Hooiveld GJ, Koning H, Childs S, Meijer DK, Moshage H, et al. Up-regulation of the multidrug resistance genes, Mrp1 and Mdr1b, and down-regulation of the organic anion transporter, Mrp2, and the bile salt transporter, Spgp, in endotoxemic rat liver. Hepatology. 1998;28:1637–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Diao L, Li N, Brayman TG, Hotz KJ, Lai Y. Regulation of MRP2/ABCC2 and BSEP/ABCB11 expression in sandwich cultured human and rat hepatocytes exposed to inflammatory cytokines TNF-{alpha}, IL-6, and IL-1{beta}. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:31185–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hartmann G, Kim H, Piquette-Miller M. Regulation of the hepatic multidrug resistance gene expression by endotoxin and inflammatory cytokines in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2001;1:189–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Spirlì C, Nathanson MH, Fiorotto R, Duner E, Denson LA, Sanz JM, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines inhibit secretion in rat bile duct epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:156–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, Hwang T, Davis CS, Wenzel RP. The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective study. JAMA. 1995;273:117–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bone RC. Toward a theory regarding the pathogenesis of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome: what we do and do not know about cytokine regulation. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:163–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Douzinas EE, Andrianakis I, Livaditi O, Paneris P, Tasoulis M, Pelekanou A, et al. The level of hypotension during hemorrhagic shock is a major determinant of the post-resuscitation systemic inflammatory response: an experimental study. BMC Physiol. 2008;8:15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Fouassier L, Beaussier M, Schiffer E, Rey C, Barbu V, Mergey M, et al. Hypoxia-induced changes in the expression of rat hepatobiliary transporter genes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G25–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee CJ, Subeq YM, Lee RP, Wu WT, Hsu BG. Low-dose propofol ameliorates haemorrhagic shock-induced organ damage in conscious rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35:766–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tazuke Y, Teitelbaum DH. Alteration of canalicular transporters in a mouse model of total parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48:193–202.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Grau T, Bonet A, Rubio M, Mateo D, Farré M, Acosta JA, et al. Liver dysfunction associated with artificial nutrition in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2007;11:R10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Stieger B, Fattinger K, Madon J, Kullak-Ublick GA, Meier PJ. Drug- and estrogen-induced cholestasis through inhibition of the hepatocellular bile salt export pump (Bsep) of rat liver. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:422–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bode KA, Donner MG, Leier I, Keppler D. Inhibition of transport across the hepatocyte canalicular membrane by the antibiotic fusidate. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002;64:151–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yoshikado T, Takada T, Yamamoto T, Yamaji H, Ito K, Santa T, et al. Itraconazole-induced cholestasis: involvement of the inhibition of bile canalicular phospholipid translocator MDR3/ABCB4. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;79:241–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wong SW, Lee KF, Wong J, Ng WW, Cheung YS, Lai PB. Dilated common bile ducts mimicking choledochal cysts in ketamine abusers. Hong Kong Med J. 2009;15:53–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lo RS, Krishnamoorthy R, Freeman JG, Austin AS. Cholestasis and biliary dilatation associated with chronic ketamine abuse: a case series. Singapore Med J. 2011;52:e52–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wai MS, Chan WM, Zhang AQ, Wu Y, Yew DT. Long-term ketamine and ketamine plus alcohol treatments produced damages in liver and kidney. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012;31:877–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Voigtländer T, Negm AA, Schneider AS, Strassburg CP, Manns MP, Wedemeyer J, et al. Secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients: model of end-stage liver disease score and renal function predict outcome. Endoscopy. 2012;44:1055–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany

    Silke Leonhardt, Peter Neuhaus & Daniel Seehofer

  2. Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectiology, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany

    Silke Leonhardt

  3. Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany

    Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker, Andreas Adler & Eckart Schott

  4. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany

    Roland Hetzer

  5. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warener Strasse 7, Berlin, 12638, Germany

    Walter Schaffartzik

  6. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Klinikum Kassel, Mönchebergstrasse 41, Kassel, 34125, Germany

    Michael Tryba

Authors
  1. Silke Leonhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Adler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eckart Schott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roland Hetzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Walter Schaffartzik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael Tryba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Peter Neuhaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Daniel Seehofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silke Leonhardt.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SL, DS, PN, WVS, AA, ES, RH, WS and MT contributed to the study conception, participated in data analysis and interpretation and revised the manuscript critically. SL collected and analysed the data and prepared the manuscript. DS analysed the data and edited the manuscript. SL is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all of the study data and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonhardt, S., Veltzke-Schlieker, W., Adler, A. et al. Trigger mechanisms of secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients. Crit Care 19, 131 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0861-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0861-5

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535