Open Access

Lack of recovery in monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression is independently associated with the development of sepsis after major trauma

  • Aurélie Cheron1,
  • Bernard Floccard1,
  • Bernard Allaouchiche1,
  • Caroline Guignant2,
  • Françoise Poitevin2,
  • Christophe Malcus2,
  • Jullien Crozon1,
  • Alexandre Faure1,
  • Christian Guillaume1,
  • Guillaume Marcotte1,
  • Alexandre Vulliez1,
  • Olivier Monneuse3 and
  • Guillaume Monneret2Email author
Critical Care201014:R208

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9331

Received: 21 July 2010

Accepted: 19 November 2010

Published: 19 November 2010

Abstract

Introduction

Major trauma is characterized by an overwhelming pro-inflammatory response and an accompanying anti-inflammatory response that lead to a state of immunosuppression, as observed after septic shock. Diminished monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen DR (mHLA-DR) is a reliable marker of monocyte dysfunction and immunosuppression. The main objective of this study was to determine the relation between mHLA-DR expression in severe trauma patients and the development of sepsis.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study over 23 months in a trauma intensive care unit at a university hospital. Patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) over 25 and age over 18 were included. mHLA-DR was assessed by flow cytometry protocol according to standardized protocol. Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous non-parametric variables, independent paired t test for continuous parametric variables and chi-square test for categorical data were used.

Results

mHLA-DR was measured three times a week during the first 14 days. One hundred five consecutive severely injured patients were monitored (ISS 38 ± 17, SAPS II 37 ± 16). Thirty-seven patients (35%) developed sepsis over the 14 days post-trauma. At days 1-2, mHLA-DR was diminished in the whole patient population, with no difference with the development of sepsis. At days 3-4, a highly significant difference appeared between septic and non-septic patients. Non- septic patients showed an increase in mHLA-DR levels, whereas septic patients did not (13,723 ± 7,766 versus 9,271 ± 6,029 antibodies per cell, p = .004). Most importantly, multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for usual clinical confounders (adjusted OR 5.41, 95% CI 1.42-20.52), revealed that a slope of mHLA-DR expression between days1-2 and days 3-4 below 1.2 remained associated with the development of sepsis.

Conclusions

Major trauma induced an immunosuppression, characterized by a decrease in mHLA-DR expression. Importantly, after multivariate regression logistic analysis, persistent decreased expression was assessed to be in relation with the development of sepsis. This is the first study in trauma patients showing a link between the lack of immune recovery and the development of sepsis on the basis of the standardized protocol. Monitoring immune function by mHLA-DR measurement could be useful to identify trauma patients at a high risk of infection.

Introduction

The global burden of death and disability due to injuries is increasing, especially in patients younger than 40 years old [1]. In the course of supportive management, injured patients often develop sepsis, which is the most frequent cause of complications and death following severe injury [2]. Immunosuppression has emerged recently as a risk factor for sepsis in trauma patients [3, 4]. It is now well established that any situation of injury or stress can induce a systemic inflammatory response that is often followed by an anti-inflammatory response [57]. This compensatory feedback mechanism, which maintains inflammatory immune homeostasis, is believed to lower natural defenses against pathogens and contribute to a state of immunosuppression [810] and is known to occur in cases of sepsis, septic shock, burns, stroke, and injury and in patients undergoing major surgery. Such alterations might be directly responsible for a detrimental outcome in trauma patients and for lowering the resistance to nosocomial infections in patients who have survived initial resuscitation [79, 11].

In the absence of specific clinical signs of immune function in intensive care patients, biomarkers of immunosuppression are clearly highly desirable. Diminished expression of human leukocyte antigen DR expression on circulating monocytes (mHLA-DR) is widely accepted as a reliable indicator of immunosuppression in critically ill patients [1214]. Some work has been devoted to trauma patients, but for the most part, these preliminary studies were performed 10 years ago (that is, before the advent of the last advanced trauma life support [ATLS] protocol for the management of multiple-injury patients). Early findings on mHLA-DR were based on limited numbers of patients and used non-standardized flow cytometry protocols [1520]. The purpose of this study was to investigate mHLA-DR expression on the basis of the standardized protocol and to assess this expression as a predictive factor of infection in a multivariate analysis.

In the study described here, mHLA-DR expression was measured according to recently established flow cytometry protocols in a group of severely injured patients. The main objective of the study was to assess whether a low mHLA-DR expression might be a good predictor of infection in such patients.

Materials and methods

Patients' inclusion

This prospective observational study was carried out over a 15-month period (July 2008 to September 2009). The protocol was reviewed by the institutional ethics committee, which waived the need for informed consent because the study was observational and involved sampling of very small quantities of blood (100 μL). The purpose of the study was explained to the patients or members of their families. Samples were collected from residual blood after completion of routine follow-up.

Inclusion criteria were an Injury Severity Score (ISS) [21, 22] of more than 25 and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Clinical exclusion criteria were age of less than 18 years, ISS of less than 25, chronic corticosteroid therapy, and death in the first 48 hours after admission. Patients admitted on a Saturday were excluded because mHLA-DR cannot be measured on day 1 or 2 (blood samples were not collected on Saturdays or Sundays, when the laboratory did not operate).

All patients admitted were followed up with prospectively until day 14 by daily clinical examination and biological tests. During follow-up, clinical and biological data were collected. The data collection comprised demographic characteristics (age and gender), infection characteristics (source, microorganisms identified, delay between trauma, and onset of sepsis), and outcome at 28 days (death or survival). Therapeutic data were also collected (a) on admission to the trauma room (the need for inotropic or vasoactive support and blood products [red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and albumin] and their quantities used to sustain a mean arterial pressure [MAP] up to 70 mm Hg [or 90 mm Hg in the case of cranial trauma], and the type and quantity of prophylactic antibiotics) and (b) during support (number of ventilator days, quantity and type of vasoactive support and of blood products, and use of massive transfusion, which was defined as more than 10 units of blood [23] or the replacement of the patient's total blood volume [24] over a 24-hour period). Creatinine, lactate concentration, and abnormal biphasic pulse transmittance waveform (BPW) were measured daily. Three clinical scores were recorded: ISS on admission (range of 0 to 75), initial severity of disease as assessed by the new Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (range of 0 to 164) [25], and the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range of 0 to 24) on admission and every day during follow-up [26]. Severe brain and thoracic injury, which are well established as risk factors for sepsis development, were also taken into account [22].

Sepsis definition

The American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference [27] definition of sepsis was used for this study, namely the presence of an identifiable site of infection and evidence of a systemic inflammatory response on the basis of at least two of the following criteria: (a) body temperature of greater than 38°C or of less than 36°C, (b) heart rate of greater than 90 beats per minute, (c) respiratory rate of greater than 20 breaths per minute or hyperventilation as indicated by an arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) of less than 32 mm Hg (less than 4.3 kPa), and (d) a white blood cell count of greater than 12,000 cells/mm3 or of less than 4,000 cells/mm3 or the presence of more than 10% immature neutrophils. The onset of sepsis was defined, as recommended by the Consensus Conference [27], as the day on which the site of infection was identified. The final diagnosis of sepsis was retrospectively established by two experts assessing the complete medical data and not involved in case management. Diagnoses of pneumonia and urinary infection were established according to the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America [28] and of the Centers for Disease Control [29], respectively. Physicians were not informed of mHLA-DR results. BPW was also determined as it may be used as an indicator of sepsis development [3032].

Blood sampling and flow cytometric analysis

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-anticoagulated blood samples were collected at 8 a.m. every 2 days after injury (on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays) (that is, at days 1 and 2, days 3 and 4, days 5 and 6, days 7 and 8, days 9 and 10, and days 11 and 12). Flow cytometric (EPICS XL; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Hialeah, FL, USA) expression of monocyte HLA-DR was assessed on arterial, venous, or capillary blood. Blood samples were stored immediately at 4°C and stained within 2 hours after collection, in accordance with the standardization recommendations for mHLA-DR measurement [33, 34]. Staining and cell acquisition were undertaken as described in the European standardized protocol. Monoclonal antibodies and their respective isotype controls were used according to the manufacturers' recommendations: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled anti-CD14 (10 μL; Immunotech, Marseille France) and phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-HLA-DR (20 μL; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) per 100 μL of whole blood. Monocytes were characterized on the basis of their CD14 expression. Results were expressed as the number of anti-HLA-DR antibodies per cell (AB/C) (normal >15,000), which is correlated with the number of HLA-DR molecules expressed on each monocyte [33].

Because sepsis alone can amplify a drop in mHLA-DR expression, mHLA-DR expression data were excluded from the analysis after the onset of sepsis, thereby precluding calculation of a difference in mHLA-DR expression between septic and non-septic patients at days 7 and 8, 9 and 10, and 11 and 12 (because of insufficient numbers of values for statistical analysis).

Statistical analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify all data for normality. Baseline characteristics were described by frequency, median and interquartile range (IQR), or (where appropriate) mean ± standard deviation. Patients were separated into two groups: those who developed sepsis and those who did not. The groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous non-parametric variables, the independent paired t test for continuous parametric variables, and the chi-square test for categorical data. mHLA-DR expression was stratified according to the best threshold chosen using the Youden index. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the areas under the curve were calculated for the slope in mHLA-DR between days 1 and 2 and days 3 and 4. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify variables associated with the risk of infection and assessed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A P value of less than 0.05 was taken as the significance level. The Bonferroni correction was used to avoid spurious results from the multiple statistical tests performed simultaneously. The alpha values for three or six tests were 0.016 and 0.008, respectively. MedCalc software version 9.6.4.0 (MedCalc Software bvba, Mariakerke, Belgium) was used to perform the statistical analyses.

Results

Patients' characteristics

A total of 536 consecutive patients in the early stages of trauma were admitted to the trauma room between July 2008 and May 2010. One hundred five of these patients met the inclusion criteria of the study (Figure 1). One hundred thirty patients were excluded because they had been rapidly transferred to another hospital for different reasons: no available rooms in our unit or the need for specific care such as aortic rupture isthmus or brain surgery (following severe brain injury). Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics on these 105 patients. SAPS II was significantly higher in septic patients (P < 0.05) than in non-septic patients as were the SOFA scores every day during follow-up and the incidence of severe brain injury. There were no statistical differences of the ISS or the incidence of severe thoracic injury between the two groups. In the emergency room, administration of vasoactive drug to maintain an MAP of up to 65 mm Hg and administration of prophylactic antibiotics were not different. Frequency of massive transfusion and the overall quantity of transfused blood were not different for the sepsis and non-sepsis groups over the first 2 post-trauma days. There was a higher proportion of patients under vasoactive drug during the first 2 days in the septic group (P = 0.0004). During follow-up, no difference in renal function (assessed by plasma creatinine concentration) or in lactate concentration was observed. Septic patients required mechanical ventilation more often and for longer periods of time than non-septic patients did (P < 0.0001). Six patients died (three from septic shock and three from cardiogenic shock), and there were no statistical differences between the two groups.
Figure 1

Flowchart of inclusion criteria of the study. ISS, Injury Severity Score.

Table 1

Clinical patients' characteristics

Parameters

Overall population

n= 105

Septic

n= 37 (35%)

Non-septic

n= 68 (65%)

P value

Age, years

38.1 ± 16.9

34.8 ± 15.6

39.9 ± 17.5

0.15a

Male, % (n)

72.4% (n = 76)

78.4% (n = 29)

69.1% (n = 47)

0.43b

ISS

37.1 ± 9.9

38.7 ± 8.9

36.2 ± 10.4

0.20a

Severe brain injury, % (n)

41% (n = 43)

59% (n = 22)

31% (n = 21)

0.008b

Severe thoracic injury, % (n)

72% (n = 76)

65% (n = 24)

76% (n = 52)

0.30b

SAPS II

36.9 ± 15.6

43 ± 15.4

33.5 ± 14.8

0.003a

Delay for MAP >65 mm Hg, minutes

0 (0 to 0.25)

0 (0 to 16.25)

0 (0 to 0)

0.14c

Need for vasoactive support in emergency room, % (n)

24% (n = 25)

35% (n = 13)

18% (n = 12)

0.077b

Prophylactic antibiotics administrated in emergency room, % (n)

42% (n = 44)

35% (n = 13)

46% (n = 31)

0.41b

SOFA score

    

   D1

4 (2 to 7)

6 (4 to 9.2)

3 (2 to 5)

0.0001c

   D2

4 (2 to 6)

6 (3.75 to 9.25)

2.5 (1 to 5)

<0.0001c

   D3

3 (1 to 5)

7 (3 to 9.25)

2 (1 to 3)

<0.0001c

   D4

2 (1 to 5)

5 (2 to 8)

2 (1 to 3)

<0.0001c

   D5

2 (1 to 4)

4 (1.75 to 7.25)

1 (1 to 2)

<0.0001c

   D6

1 (1 to 3)

3 (1 to 7)

1 (1 to 2)

<0.0001c

mHLA-DR levels, antibodies per cell

   D1 and 2

11,371 ± 4,870

11,753 ± 4,291

11,177 ± 5,169

0.62a

   D3 and 4

12,224 ± 7,501

9,271 ± 6,029

13,723 ± 7,766

0.004a

   D5 and 6

15,623 ± 9,123

11,707 ± 6,004

16,602 ± 9535

0.05a

Variations in mHLA-DR, antibodies per cell

   D3 and 4/D1 and 2

1.25 ± 0.57

0.83 ± 0.43

1.44 ± 0.53

<0.0001a

   D5 and 6/D3 and 4

1.37 ± 1.11

1.32 ± 0.82

1.38 ± 1.18

0.83a

Deaths at day 28, % (n)

6% (n = 6)

8% (n = 3)

4% (n = 3)

0.73b

Mechanical ventilation, % (n)

66% (n = 69)

89% (n = 33)

53% (n = 36)

0.0004b

Duration of mechanical ventilation, days

6 (3 to 11)

9 (6.75 to 19)

3 (2 to 5.5)

<0.0001c

Massive transfusion required, % (n)

29% (n = 31)

35% (n = 13)

26% (n = 18)

0.48b

Volume of transfusion, mL

900 (0 to 2,850)

1,200 (0 to 3,500)

0 (0 to 2,700)

0.067c

Shock (need for vasoactive drug on D1 and 2), % (n)

33% (n = 35)

57% (n = 21)

21% (n = 14)

0.0004b

Length of stay in ICU, days

9 (6 to 15)

15 (10 to 24.25)

7 (5 to 11)

<0.0001c

Parametric variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and non-parametric variables are expressed as median (interquartile range) or frequencies. aIndependent samples t test; bchi-square test; cMann-Whitney test. D, days; ICU, intensive care unit; ISS, Injury Severity Score; MAP, mean arterial pressure; mHLA-DR, monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR; SAPS II, Simple Acute Physiology Score II; SOFA, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment.

Incidence of sepsis

Thirty-seven patients developed sepsis during follow-up. Pneumonia was the more frequent infection (n = 30), followed by urinary tract infection (n = 7). Causative bacteria were fairly evenly distributed between Gram-positive (n = 14) and Gram-negative (n = 21) organisms. Two patients had a mixed bacterial infection (Gram-positive and -negative). The median interval between trauma and onset of sepsis was 4 days (3 to 6.25).

Monitoring of mHLA-DR expression

At day 2, mHLA-DR expression was diminished in all 105 patients (Figure 2 and 3a). At days 1 and 2, mHLA-DR expression showed no statistically significant difference between septic and non-septic patients (Table 1 and Figure 3b). At days 3 and 4, mHLA-DR expression had risen in non-septic patients but remained low in septic patients (13,723 ± 7,766 AB/C versus 9,271 ± 6,029 AB/C; P = 0.004) (Figure 3b). At days 5 and 6, septic patients still tended to exhibit lower mHLA-DR expression than non-septic patients, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance.
Figure 2

Monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) measurement by flow cytometry. (a) Monocyte identification in whole blood. An ungated leukocyte biparametric representation on the basis of side scatter characteristics (SSC, y-axis) and CD14 expression (FITC-CD14, x-axis) is shown. CD14-expressing population is easily distinguishable as gating region 'CD14+ monocytes'. (b) Gated cells from 'CD14+ monocytes' in (a) are expressed on the basis of HLA-DR expression (monoparametric histogram, PE-HLA-DR). The black histogram depicts isotype control, whereas the gray one represents patient expression (illustrative example). Results are obtained as means of fluorescence intensities (MFI) and then are transformed into number of antibodies per cell (AB/C). FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PE, phycoerythrin.

Figure 3

Time course of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR) expression in trauma patients. Mean and standard deviation are presented. Results are expressed as numbers of anti-mHLA-DR antibodies bound per cell (AB/C). The independent paired t test was used for comparison between groups. *P < 0.01. (a) mHLA-DR expression in the whole trauma population. (b) mHLA-DR expression in patients with (gray bars) or without (white bars) sepsis.

Given the wide fluctuation of mHLA-DR expression data, ratios were calculated between values for two points in time, namely days 3 and 4/days 1 and 2 and days 5 and 6/days 3 and 4. The slope of mHLA-DR expression at days 3 and 4 showed a highly significant statistical difference between non-septic and septic patients (1.44 ± 0.53 versus 0.83 ± 0.43, respectively; P < 0.0001) (Table 1). We next established an ROC analysis (Figure 4). The area under the curve was 0.80 (P = 0.05, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.88). ROC curve analysis for delta mHLA-DR provided a 1.2 variation in mHLA-DR expression (days 3 and 4/days 1 and 2) as the best cutoff value to discriminate between septic and non-septic patients. At that threshold, the test had an 83% sensitivity, a 61% specificity, a 42% positive predictive value, and an 87% negative predictive value. At days 5 and 6, no significant difference was observed in mHLA-DR expression or in the mHLA-DR slope (days 5 and 6/days 3 and 4) between the two patient groups.
Figure 4

Receiving operating curve of variation of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression ratio (days 3 and 4/days 1 and 2) expressed as antibodies per cell for predicting sepsis. Area under curve was 0.80 (P = 0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.88). The best threshold (that is, which maximized sensitivity and sensibility) was 1.2. For a cutoff of 1.2, positive predictive value was 42% and negative predictive value was 87%.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated, after adjustment for other confounding factors, that an mHLA-DR ratio of days 3 and 4/days 1 and 2 less than or equal to 1.2 was associated with sepsis to a highly significant degree (adjusted OR 5.41, 95% CI 1.42 to 20.52) (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis used to differentiate septic and non-septic patients

  

Univariate (n= 105)

Multivariate (n= 77)

  

OR

95% CI

P value

OR

95% CI

P value

Sex male

Positive

1.62

0.63-4.13

0.3129

   

Severe brain injury

Positive

3.28

1.42-7.56

0.005

2.87

0.95-8.72

0.06

Severe thoracic injury

Positive

0.57

0.23-1.37

0.21

   

ISS

≥40

2.19

0.95-5.06

0.066

2.84

0.88-9.16

0.08

SAPS II

≥37

3.17

1.38-7.32

0.007

2.01

0.67-6.08

0.21

D3 and 4/D1 and 2 mHLA-DR

≤1.2

4.81

1.45-16

0.009

5.41

1.42-20.52

0.013

Massive transfusion

Positive

1.5

0.63-3.57

0.35

   

CI, confidence interval; D, days; ISS, Injury Severity Score; mHLA-DR, monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR; OR, odds ratio; SAPS II, Simple Acute Physiology Score II.

Discussion

Severe injury is characterized by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome involving activation of several cellular systems and the overwhelming production, by the innate immune system, of proinflammatory cytokines and other inflammatory mediators. It is subsequently followed by a compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome [35, 36]. This negative feedback mechanism has a protective effect over the first few hours after trauma but may become harmful if it persists. Considerable clinical and experimental evidence indicates that in such patients a number of immune functions are rapidly altered. Monocyte alterations, for example, can decrease phagocytosis, inflammatory cytokine expression, and antigen presentation because of the loss of mHLA-DR expression. Lymphocyte anergy and apoptosis can ensue [3, 3739]. These changes together may increase susceptibility to infection, which in turn could provoke multiple organ failure and death.

Diminished mHLA-DR expression has been proposed as a reliable biomarker of immunosuppression in ICU patients. Today, it is the most reliable marker and is used in most of the studies about ICU-acquired immunosuppression. More specifically, it has been shown to be a predictor of septic complications in several conditions, including surgical interventions, sepsis, burns, stroke, and pancreatitis [11, 4048]. Immunosuppression has long been postulated as a concomitant of trauma [37, 49, 50]. In regard to mHLA-DR, the pioneering work of Polk and colleagues [50] reported in 1986 revealed an association between the development of sepsis and low mHLA-DR expression. Subsequently, mHLA-DR expression was assessed as a predictor of sepsis in several series of severely injured patients [15, 17, 18, 20, 39, 5153]. A major limitation of these studies is that they were conducted over a 20-year period, during which time case management and methodologies for measurement of mHLA-DR expression have evolved, thereby complicating interpretation and comparison of the findings of these studies.

In the present cohort, incidence of sepsis was 35% and the mortality rate for the entire study was 6%. Though apparently high, these values are in concordance with those of a previous epidemiologic study by Osborn and colleagues [2], in which incidence rates of sepsis were 42% for moderate injury (defined as an ISS of between 15 and 29) and 39% for severe injury (ISS of up to 30). Another epidemiologic study in trauma patients reported a low sepsis incidence, but most of the patients presented with mild injury (ISS of less than 15: 67.7%) and no brain injury [54], the latter of which is known to be a risk factor for developing pneumonia [5558]. In our cohort, septic patients presented more trauma brain injury than the non-septic patients did, and this is in concordance with the literature.

The present study showed an overall reduction in mHLA-DR expression in trauma patients. Most importantly, in injured patients with an uneventful outcome, mHLA-DR expression returned to normal within a week. In contrast, in patients who developed infection, mHLA-DR levels remained low or fell even lower.

It would appear that the steepness of the slope of mHLA-DR recovery is a more significant indicator than the levels attained at a given point in time. Indeed, the incidence of sepsis was significantly greater in the group with a slope of less than 1.2 (days 3 and 4/days 1 and 2). This suggests that patients in whom recovery in mHLA-DR expression did not begin between days 1 and 2 and days 3 and 4 had an increased risk of developing sepsis. This observation is consistent with recent findings reported by Lukaszewicz and colleagues [59] in surgical patients. Significantly, in the present study, multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that low mHLA-DR expression was independently associated with the development of sepsis, whereas all the other parameters included in the analysis (ISS, SAPS II, presence of a severe brain trauma, and massive transfusion) were not predictive. A slope of mHLA-DR of less than 1.2 was independently associated with the risk of developing sepsis, a finding that reflects the possible pivotal role of immune dysfunction in the increased risk of infection in trauma patients. In Table 1 some variables that may seem relevant (like the length of stay in the ICU and the duration of mechanical ventilation) were not included in the multivariate analysis, because they have to be considered as a consequence of the development of sepsis and not a risk factor. Moreover, it has to be considered that the onset of sepsis is early (median at day 4) and that every patient was still in the ICU at this time point.

Chest trauma is reported to account for one third of acute-trauma emergency room admissions, and 30% to 75% of trauma patients have pulmonary contusions [60], usually as a result of rapid deceleration [61]. The incidence of lung injury seemed to be quite significant in our study (72%) and is probably due to the severity of the trauma patients included. However, there were no differences between the presences of thoracic injury between infected and non-infected groups. The pathophysiology of pulmonary contusion includes a strong inflammatory response in the lung parenchyma, resulting in increased alveolocapillary permeability, pulmonary edema, ventilation/perfusion mismatch, increased pulmonary shunting, and loss of compliance. As at the systemic level, this local response is followed by an anti-inflammatory response. Muehlstedt and colleagues [19] observed not only altered HLA-DR expression on the surface of alveolar macrophages in the lungs of trauma patients who developed sepsis but also altered production of other cytokines. Local organ immunosuppression was present and may have been responsible for the development of nosocomial pneumonia in the injured patients [19].

As far as the authors can ascertain, this is the first study, using the standardized test described by the European multicenter study [33] and multivariate analysis, aimed specifically at evaluating mHLA-DR expression in a cohort of severe trauma patients. Most previous studies have been conducted in smaller series of patients spanning a highly variable spectrum of severity (from mild to severe trauma) [1517, 58]. Furthermore, these studies did not include multivariate analysis for assessment of the usual clinical confounders of mHLA-DR expression levels, nor did they exclude mHLA-DR expression data following onset of sepsis, as the present study did (see Materials and methods) in order to avoid bias from possible amplification by the sepsis itself of lowered mHLA-DR expression. Finally, the data from previous studies are not readily comparable, owing to differences, from one study to another, in the values studied (mainly 'percentages of positive monocytes' or 'mean fluorescence intensity'), which are generally specific for a given laboratory and therefore defy comparability on a wider scale. The European protocol now recommends expression of the results as numbers of antibodies per cell, a recommendation that will facilitate comparison of data obtained by different laboratories.

The present study has a number of limitations. First, it is a single-center study. The findings clearly need to be confirmed by a multicenter study. Second, the study enrolled only 105 patients. Though relatively small, the series was very homogeneous in terms of severity and also highly representative of the trauma patient population commonly encountered. Finally, mHLA-DR expression was measured every 2 days after trauma. However, the mean onset of infection was on day 4; in some patients, this limited the amount of analyzable mHLA-DR expression data available before day 4. In subsequent studies, follow-up of patients should consist of daily monitoring during the early post-trauma period. Indeed, one potentially interesting objective of a future study would be an assessment of the usefulness of daily mHLA-DR measurements to detect patients at an increased risk of infection. To pre-empt development of infection, clinicians could give these patients prophylactic treatment, such as antibiotics [48], immunostimulant by interferon-gamma [62], or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, as used in septic shock [35].

Conclusions

Trauma induces a temporary, relative immunosuppression characterized by diminished mHLA-DR expression. The pattern of progression of mHLA-DR expression over time appears to be a more useful indicator of increased risk of infection than the actual levels of mHLA-DR expression at given points in time. Patients in whom recovery of mHLA-DR expression begins after days 1 and 2 are likely to have an uneventful outcome, whereas those with persistently lower levels of mHLA-DR expression are more likely to suffer infection. Large, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these promising results.

Key messages

  • Severe trauma patients present with a transient immunosuppression with decreased mHLA-DR expression.

  • The lack of mHLA-DR recovery between days 3 and 4 and days 1 and 2 is associated with sepsis.

  • After adjustment for classic confounding risk factors, the lack of mHLA-DR recovery was the sole factor independently and significantly associated with the development of sepsis.

Abbreviations

AB/C: 

antibodies per cell

BPW: 

biphasic pulse transmittance waveform

CI: 

confidence interval

ICU: 

intensive care unit

ISS: 

Injury Severity Score

MAP: 

mean arterial pressure

MHLA-DR: 

monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR

OR: 

odds ratio

ROC: 

receiver operating characteristic

SAPS II: 

Simplified Acute Physiology Score II

SOFA: 

Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Hospices Civils de Lyon. We thank the technical staff of the immunology laboratory of Edouard Herriot University Hospital.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de réanimation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot
(2)
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Laboratoire d'immunologie cellulaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot
(3)
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de chirurgie d'urgence, Hôpital Edouard Herriot

References

  1. Kauvar DS, Wade CE: The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage: US and international perspectives. Crit Care 2005,9(Suppl 5):S1-9. 10.1186/cc3779PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Osborn TM, Tracy JK, Dunne JR, Pasquale M, Napolitano LM: Epidemiology of sepsis in patients with traumatic injury. Crit Care Med 2004, 32: 2234-2240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tschoeke SK, Ertel W: Immunoparalysis after multiple trauma. Injury 2007, 38: 1346-1357. 10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.041View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Keel M, Trentz O: Pathophysiology of polytrauma. Injury 2005, 36: 691-709. 10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Adib-Conquy M, Cavaillon JM: Compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome. Thromb Haemost 2009, 101: 36-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bone RC: Immunologic dissonance: a continuing evolution in our understanding of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Ann Intern Med 1996, 125: 680-687.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ward NS, Casserly B, Ayala A: The compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS) in critically ill patients. Clin Chest Med 2008, 29: 617-625. viii 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.06.010PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kox WJ, Volk T, Kox SN, Volk HD: Immunomodulatory therapies in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26 Suppl 1: 124-128. 10.1007/s001340051129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Munford RS, Pugin J: Normal responses to injury prevent systemic inflammation and can be immunosuppressive. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 163: 316-321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE: The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2003, 348: 138-150. 10.1056/NEJMra021333View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang DP, Yan FL, Xu HQ, Zhu YX, Yin Y, Lu HQ: A decrease of human leucocyte antigen-DR expression on monocytes in peripheral blood predicts stroke-associated infection in critically-ill patients with acute stroke. Eur J Neurol 2009, 16: 498-505. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02512.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Volk HD, Reinke P, Docke WD: Immunological monitoring of the inflammatory process: Which variables? When to assess? Eur J Surg Suppl 1999, (584):70-72. 10.1080/11024159950188600Google Scholar
  13. Volk HD, Reinke P, Krausch D, Zuckermann H, Asadullah K, Muller JM, Docke WD, Kox WJ: Monocyte deactivation--rationale for a new therapeutic strategy in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 1996, 22 Suppl 4: 474-481. 10.1007/BF01743727View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Monneret G, Venet F, Pachot A, Lepape A: Monitoring immune dysfunctions in the septic patient: a new skin for the old ceremony. Mol Med 2008, 14: 64-78. 10.2119/2007-00102.MonneretPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hershman MJ, Cheadle WG, Wellhausen SR, Davidson PF, Polk HC: Monocyte HLA-DR antigen expression characterizes clinical outcome in the trauma patient. Br J Surg 1990, 77: 204-207. 10.1002/bjs.1800770225View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sherry RM, Cue JI, Goddard JK, Parramore JB, DiPiro JT: Interleukin-10 is associated with the development of sepsis in trauma patients. J Trauma 1996, 40: 613-616. discussion 616-617 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ditschkowski M, Kreuzfelder E, Rebmann V, Ferencik S, Majetschak M, Schmid EN, Obertacke U, Hirche H, Schade UF, Grosse-Wilde H: HLA-DR expression and soluble HLA-DR levels in septic patients after trauma. Ann Surg 1999, 229: 246-254. 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00013PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Giannoudis PV, Smith RM, Windsor AC, Bellamy MC, Guillou PJ: Monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression correlates with intrapulmonary shunting after major trauma. Am J Surg 1999, 177: 454-459. 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00099-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Muehlstedt SG, Lyte M, Rodriguez JL: Increased IL-10 production and HLA-DR suppression in the lungs of injured patients precede the development of nosocomial pneumonia. Shock 2002, 17: 443-450. 10.1097/00024382-200206000-00001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Walsh DS, Thavichaigarn P, Pattanapanyasat K, Siritongtaworn P, Kongcharoen P, Tongtawe P, Yongvanitchit K, Jiarakul N, Dheeradhada C, Pearce FJ, Wiesmann WP, Webster HK: Characterization of circulating monocytes expressing HLA-DR or CD71 and related soluble factors for 2 weeks after severe, non-thermal injury. J Surg Res 2005, 129: 221-230. 10.1016/j.jss.2005.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB: The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974, 14: 187-196. 10.1097/00005373-197403000-00001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenspan L, McLellan BA, Greig H: Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score: a scoring chart. J Trauma 1985, 25: 60-64. 10.1097/00005373-198501000-00010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson RF, Dulchavsky SA, Soullier G, Beckman B: Problems with 20 or more blood transfusions in 24 hours. Am Surg 1987, 53: 410-417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hewitt PE, Machin SJ: ABC of transfusion. Massive blood transfusion. BMJ 1990, 300: 107-109. 10.1136/bmj.300.6717.107PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993, 270: 2957-2963. 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S: Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Crit Care Med 1998, 26: 1793-1800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis Crit Care Med 1992, 20: 864-874. 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00025Google Scholar
  28. American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America: Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005, 171: 388-416. 10.1164/rccm.200405-644STView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM: CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988, 16: 128-140. 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chopin N, Floccard B, Sobas F, Illinger J, Boselli E, Benatir F, Levrat A, Guillaume C, Crozon J, Negrier C, Allaouchiche B: Activated partial thromboplastin time waveform analysis: a new tool to detect infection? Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 1654-1660. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217471.12799.1CView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Delannoy B, Guye ML, Hay Slaiman D, Lehot JJ, Cannesson M: Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on activated partial thromboplastin time waveform analysis, serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein concentrations. Crit Care 2009, 13: R180. 10.1186/cc8166PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dempfle CE, Lorenz S, Smolinski M, Wurst M, West S, Houdijk WP, Quintel M, Borggrefe M: Utility of activated partial thromboplastin time waveform analysis for identification of sepsis and overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004, 32: 520-524. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000110678.52863.F3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Döcke WD, Hoflich C, Davis KA, Rottgers K, Meisel C, Kiefer P, Weber SU, Hedwig-Geissing M, Kreuzfelder E, Tschentscher P, Nebe T, Engel A, Monneret G, Spittler A, Schmolke K, Reinke P, Volk HD, Kunz D: Monitoring temporary immunodepression by flow cytometric measurement of monocytic HLA-DR expression: a multicenter standardized study. Clin Chem 2005, 51: 2341-2347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Monneret G, Elmenkouri N, Bohe J, Debard AL, Gutowski MC, Bienvenu J, Lepape A: Analytical requirements for measuring monocytic human lymphocyte antigen DR by flow cytometry: application to the monitoring of patients with septic shock. Clin Chem 2002, 48: 1589-1592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Meisel C, Schefold JC, Pschowski R, Baumann T, Hetzger K, Gregor J, Weber-Carstens S, Hasper D, Keh D, Zuckermann H, Reinke P, Volk HD: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reverse sepsis-associated immunosuppression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009, 180: 640-648. 10.1164/rccm.200903-0363OCView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mannick JA, Rodrick ML, Lederer JA: The immunologic response to injury. J Am Coll Surg 2001, 193: 237-244. 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01011-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Faist E, Mewes A, Strasser T, Walz A, Alkan S, Baker C, Ertel W, Heberer G: Alteration of monocyte function following major injury. Arch Surg 1988, 123: 287-292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Faist E, Schinkel C, Zimmer S: Update on the mechanisms of immune suppression of injury and immune modulation. World J Surg 1996, 20: 454-459. 10.1007/s002689900071View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kampalath B, Cleveland RP, Chang CC, Kass L: Monocytes with altered phenotypes in posttrauma patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003, 127: 1580-1585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Venet F, Tissot S, Debard AL, Faudot C, Crampe C, Pachot A, Ayala A, Monneret G: Decreased monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression after severe burn injury: correlation with severity and secondary septic shock. Crit Care Med 2007, 35: 1910-1917. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275271.77350.B6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Satoh A, Miura T, Satoh K, Masamune A, Yamagiwa T, Sakai Y, Shibuya K, Takeda K, Kaku M, Shimosegawa T: Human leukocyte antigen-DR expression on peripheral monocytes as a predictive marker of sepsis during acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2002, 25: 245-250. 10.1097/00006676-200210000-00006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gotzinger P, Sautner T, Spittler A, Barlan M, Wamser P, Roth E, Jakesz R, Fugger R: Severe acute pancreatitis causes alterations in HLA-DR and CD14 expression on peripheral blood monocytes independently of surgical treatment. Eur J Surg 2000, 166: 628-632. 10.1080/110241500750008286View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tschaikowsky K, Hedwig-Geissing M, Schiele A, Bremer F, Schywalsky M, Schuttler J: Coincidence of pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in the early phase of severe sepsis: Longitudinal study of mononuclear histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DR expression, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and changes in T-cell subsets in septic and postoperative patients. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1015-1023. 10.1097/00003246-200205000-00010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Allen ML, Peters MJ, Goldman A, Elliott M, James I, Callard R, Klein NJ: Early postoperative monocyte deactivation predicts systemic inflammation and prolonged stay in pediatric cardiac intensive care. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1140-1145. 10.1097/00003246-200205000-00031View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wakefield CH, Carey PD, Foulds S, Monson JR, Guillou PJ: Changes in major histocompatibility complex class II expression in monocytes and T cells of patients developing infection after surgery. Br J Surg 1993, 80: 205-209. 10.1002/bjs.1800800224View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Efron PA, Matsumoto T, McAuliffe PF, Scumpia P, Ungaro R, Fujita S, Moldawer LL, Foley D, Hemming AW: Major hepatectomy induces phenotypic changes in circulating dendritic cells and monocytes. J Clin Immunol 2009, 29: 568-581. 10.1007/s10875-009-9291-yPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang HM, Yu Y, Chai JK, Hu S, Sheng ZY, Yao YM: Low HLA-DR expression on CD14+ monocytes of burn victims with sepsis, and the effect of carbachol in vitro. Burns 2008, 34: 1158-1162. 10.1016/j.burns.2008.01.026View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Harms H, Prass K, Meisel C, Klehmet J, Rogge W, Drenckhahn C, Gohler J, Bereswill S, Gobel U, Wernecke KD, Wolf T, Arnold G, Halle E, Volk HD, Dirnagl U, Meisel A: Preventive antibacterial therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2008, 3: e2158. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002158PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. O'Mahony JB, Palder SB, Wood JJ, McIrvine A, Rodrick ML, Demling RH, Mannick JA: Depression of cellular immunity after multiple trauma in the absence of sepsis. J Trauma 1984, 24: 869-875.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Polk HC Jr, George CD, Wellhausen SR, Cost K, Davidson PR, Regan MP, Borzotta AP: A systematic study of host defense processes in badly injured patients. Ann Surg 1986, 204: 282-299.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Giannoudis PV, Smith RM, Perry SL, Windsor AJ, Dickson RA, Bellamy MC: Immediate IL-10 expression following major orthopaedic trauma: relationship to anti-inflammatory response and subsequent development of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26: 1076-1081. 10.1007/s001340051320View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Huschak G, Zur Nieden K, Stuttmann R, Riemann D: Changes in monocytic expression of aminopeptidase N/CD13 after major trauma. Clin Exp Immunol 2003, 134: 491-496. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2003.02302.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Hershman MJ, Cheadle WG, Kuftinec D, Polk HC Jr, George CD: An outcome predictive score for sepsis and death following injury. Injury 1988, 19: 263-266. 10.1016/0020-1383(88)90042-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Muckart DJ, Bhagwanjee S: American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference definitions of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and allied disorders in relation to critically injured patients. Crit Care Med 1997, 25: 1789-1795. 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarrafzadeh AS, Peltonen EE, Kaisers U, Kuchler I, Lanksch WR, Unterberg AW: Secondary insults in severe head injury--do multiply injured patients do worse? Crit Care Med 2001, 29: 1116-1123. 10.1097/00003246-200106000-00004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Polderman KH, Tjong Tjin Joe R, Peerdeman SM, Vandertop WP, Girbes AR: Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on intracranial pressure and outcome in patients with severe head injury. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28: 1563-1573. 10.1007/s00134-002-1511-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Bronchard R, Albaladejo P, Brezac G, Geffroy A, Seince PF, Morris W, Branger C, Marty J: Early onset pneumonia: risk factors and consequences in head trauma patients. Anesthesiology 2004, 100: 234-239. 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Schirmer-Mikalsen K, Vik A, Gisvold SE, Skandsen T, Hynne H, Klepstad P: Severe head injury: control of physiological variables, organ failure and complications in the intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51: 1194-1201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lukaszewicz AC, Grienay M, Resche-Rigon M, Pirracchio R, Faivre V, Boval B, Payen D: Monocytic HLA-DR expression in intensive care patients: interest for prognosis and secondary infection prediction. Crit Care Med 2009, 37: 2746-2752. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ab858aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Allen GS, Coates NE: Pulmonary contusion: a collective review. Am Surg 1996, 62: 895-900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Raghavendran K, Notter RH, Davidson BA, Helinski JD, Kunkel SL, Knight PR: Lung contusion: inflammatory mechanisms and interaction with other injuries. Shock 2009, 32: 122-130. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31819c385cPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Turina M, Dickinson A, Gardner S, Polk HC Jr: Monocyte HLA-DR and interferon-gamma treatment in severely injured patients--a critical reappraisal more than a decade later. J Am Coll Surg 2006, 203: 73-81. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.03.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cheron et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.