We want to know more about our readers. Tell us about yourself in
our short survey
for a chance to win a MacBook Air.
Research
Open Access
Goal-directed coagulation management of major trauma patients using thromboelastometry (ROTEM®)-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate
The appropriate strategy for trauma-induced coagulopathy management is under debate. We report the treatment of major trauma using mainly coagulation factor concentrates.
Methods
This retrospective analysis included trauma patients who received ≥ 5 units of red blood cell concentrate within 24 hours. Coagulation management was guided by thromboelastometry (ROTEM®). Fibrinogen concentrate was given as first-line haemostatic therapy when maximum clot firmness (MCF) measured by FibTEM (fibrin-based test) was <10 mm. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) was given in case of recent coumarin intake or clotting time measured by extrinsic activation test (EXTEM) >1.5 times normal. Lack of improvement in EXTEM MCF after fibrinogen concentrate administration was an indication for platelet concentrate. The observed mortality was compared with the mortality predicted by the trauma injury severity score (TRISS) and by the revised injury severity classification (RISC) score.
Results
Of 131 patients included, 128 received fibrinogen concentrate as first-line therapy, 98 additionally received PCC, while 3 patients with recent coumarin intake received only PCC. Twelve patients received FFP and 29 received platelet concentrate. The observed mortality was 24.4%, lower than the TRISS mortality of 33.7% (P = 0.032) and the RISC mortality of 28.7% (P > 0.05). After excluding 17 patients with traumatic brain injury, the difference in mortality was 14% observed versus 27.8% predicted by TRISS (P = 0.0018) and 24.3% predicted by RISC (P = 0.014).
Conclusions
ROTEM®-guided haemostatic therapy, with fibrinogen concentrate as first-line haemostatic therapy and additional PCC, was goal-directed and fast. A favourable survival rate was observed. Prospective, randomized trials to investigate this therapeutic alternative further appear warranted.
Introduction
Coagulopathy has been shown to be present in approximately 25 to 35% of all trauma patients on admission to the emergency room (ER) [1, 2]. This represents a serious problem for major trauma patients and accounts for 40% of all trauma-related deaths [3]. Coagulopathy forces a strategy of early and rapid haemostatic treatment to prevent exsanguination. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is part of the massive transfusion protocols in most trauma centres [3–5], although its efficacy is uncertain. Massive transfusion protocols that favour a red blood cell (RBC):FFP ratio of 1:1 have shown conflicting results [6–14]. In addition, there are well-recognised risks associated with FFP administration in the trauma setting, such as acute lung injury, volume overload, and nosocomial infection [12, 15–17]. According to the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) report, the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) following FFP transfusion is approximately 1:5000. The accumulation of 162 reports of TRALI to SHOT over eight years, and its implication in 36 deaths and 93 cases of major morbidity, has led to the recognition that TRALI is the most important cause of transfusion-associated mortality and morbidity [18].
It has been shown that the amount of fibrinogen administered to trauma patients correlates with survival [19]. Fibrinogen concentrate [20, 21] and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) [22, 23] have each previously been administered to trauma and surgical patients with success, albeit not in studies conducted exclusively in the trauma setting. However, there have not been any studies on the combined use of fibrinogen concentrate and PCC for prompt haemostatic therapy in trauma patients. The administration of coagulation factor concentrates may facilitate early and aggressive correction of coagulopathy by eliminating the time delay associated with cross-matching and thawing of FFP. Goal-directed haemostatic therapy with coagulation factor concentrates may also reduce transfusion of allogeneic blood products, which is desirable given their negative impact on the patient outcomes.
In recent years, viscoelastic methods that assess the speed of clotting and quality of the clot, such as thromboelastometry (ROTEM®, Tem International GmbH, Munich, Germany), have been successfully used to guide haemostatic therapy. Their application in the perioperative setting has been shown to decrease transfusion of allogeneic blood products and the costs associated with haemostatic management [24–26].
We investigated administration of fibrinogen concentrate as first-line haemostatic therapy in trauma patients with severe bleeding; additional PCC therapy was administered as required. These treatments were guided by thromboelastometry. Our hypothesis was that prompt, goal-directed coagulation treatment with coagulation factor concentrates may prove beneficial for patient outcomes. Observed mortality was compared with the mortality predicted by the trauma injury severity score (TRISS) and by the revised injury severity classification (RISC) score.
Materials and methods
We studied patients who received five units or more of RBC within the first 24 hours after arrival at our trauma centre. Since 2001, ROTEM analysis has been part of our coagulation monitoring protocol for all trauma cases requiring the full trauma team in the ER. We use the ROTEM results to guide coagulation therapy, which mainly comprises coagulation factor concentrates. Approval from the local ethics committee was obtained for the retrospective collection of the data. As the coagulation analyses and the haemostatic therapy were part of the clinic's standard, the ethics committee waived the necessity to obtained informed written consent from the patients included in the analyses.
The coagulation management was guided by thromboelastometry performed on the ROTEM device (Tem International GmbH, Munich, Germany). The method measures the viscoelastic properties of the clot and provides information on the speed of coagulation initiation, kinetics of clot growth, clot strength and breakdown [27]. The analyses are performed by pipetting 300 μl citrated whole blood and 20 μl 0.2 M calcium chloride with specific activators into a plastic cup. Measurement of coagulation in ROTEM is performed after the vertical immersion of a plastic pin into the blood sample. The pin rotates slowly backwards and forwards through an angle of 4.75°. Following generation of the first fibrin filaments between the pin and the wall of the test cup, the rotational range of the pin is reduced. The increasing restriction of the pin's movement is transferred to a graphical display, a plot that shows changes in the viscoelastic properties of the clot over time. The following parameters were recorded for the ROTEM tests: clotting time (CT (seconds); time from the start of the test until a clot firmness of 2 mm is detected), amplitude 10 (mm), the clot amplitude 10 minutes after the beginning of clotting) and the maximum clot firmness (MCF (mm)). We performed extrinsically activated thromboelastometric test (EXTEM), a test that uses rabbit brain thromboplastin as an activator, and fibrin-based thromboelastometric test (FibTEM), a test that assesses the fibrin-based clot using both extrinsic activation and addition of cytochalasin D to inhibit platelets' contribution to the formation of the clot (Figure 1). Reference ranges for the tests' parameters have been previously determined in a multi-centre investigation [27].
Figure 1
The ROTEM®analyses: EXTEM®test (extrinsically activated test) and FibTEM®test (fibrin clot obtained by platelet inhibition with cytochalasin D). The clotting time (CT (seconds)) represents the time from the start of the test until a clot firmness of 2 mm is detected; maximum clot firmness (MCF (mm)) represents the total amplitude of the clot.
The standard protocol for ER management in our institution was followed. Blood for both ROTEM and routine laboratory testing was drawn immediately after placement of a central venous line on admission to the ER. Blood samples for ROTEM analysis were collected in a standard coagulation tube containing a 0.106 M citrate solution, resulting in a blood to citrate ratio of 9:1. ROTEM tests were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and the analyses were started within five minutes of blood sampling. For prompt assessment of the patient's coagulation status, preliminary test results were obtained as early as five minutes after starting the analysis; the full results followed 10 to 20 minutes after starting the analysis. The ROTEM analyses were performed on admission to the ER and at the end of the operation (arrival at the ICU).
In parallel, laboratory analyses were performed as follows: fibrinogen concentration on the STA-R® Analyzer (Stago Diagnostica, Asnieres, France); prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) determined on Sysmex XE-2100 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany); haemoglobin, haematocrit and platelet count determined on Sysmex SF-3000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan); base excess determined on Roche OMNI® S Blood Gas Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Standard laboratory analyses were performed on admission to the ER, on arrival at the ICU and 24 hours after admission to the ER.
At the beginning of our experience with ROTEM analysis, we observed that most of the major trauma patients showed a reduced MCF in the FibTEM test performed on admission to the ER. Low FibTEM MCF reflects reduced fibrinogen concentration or disturbed fibrin polymerization. To increase MCF, 2 to 4 g of fibrinogen concentrate (Haemocomplettan® P, CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) were administered as first-line therapy. A FibTEM MCF of 10 to 12 mm was chosen as the target value. Platelet concentrate was only transfused in patients not responding sufficiently to fibrinogen concentrate (i.e. absence of an adequate increase in MCF in the EXTEM test after the administration of fibrinogen concentrate).
Patients with recent intake of coumarins, as well as patients showing prolonged EXTEM CT (>1.5 times normal) received an additional 1000 to 1500 U PCC to augment thrombin generation. The following PCC products were used from 2005 to 2009: Beriplex (CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany), Octaplex (Octapharma, Vienna, Austria) and Prothromplex (Baxter, Vienna, Austria).
The target haemoglobin concentration during the operative procedure was 10 g/dL. In the postoperative phase, lower haemoglobin levels were tolerated.
Subjects' age and gender were noted, together with coagulation results, blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on admission. Predicted mortality for each patient was estimated using the TRISS methodology modified for intubated patients [28] and the RISC score [29]. Actual mortality until discharge from the hospital was also documented.
Statistical analysis
For all parameters, normality of the data distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and those distributed otherwise were expressed as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile). Depending on the underlying distribution, the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U Test was used to test for differences between survivors and non-survivors. Mortality rates (actual vs. TRISS or vs. RISC) were compared using the chi-squared test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results
From January 2005 until April 2009, 149 patients received five or more RBC units within the first 24 hours of ICU admission. Fifteen patients who died in the first hour after admission, most of whom arrived under cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, were excluded from the study, together with three patients who received no haemostatic therapy within the first 24 hours. Therefore, 131 patients were included in the analysis.
Patients' characteristics are listed in Table 1. There were 96 males and 35 females, with a mean age of 46 ± 18 years. The mean ISS was 38 ± 15. All but three patients received immediate emergency operative care. Statistically significant differences between survivors and non-survivors were observed: survivors were younger, had higher GCS scores, lower ISS and higher TRISS and RISC scores (i.e. higher predicted survival). The mean systolic blood pressure on admission to the ER was 88 ± 28 mmHg, with values of 100 mmHg or less in 106 patients. The mean base excess was -6.2 ± 3.5 mmol/l, with values of -10 mmol/l or less in 27 patients and -5 mmol/l or less in 79 patients. Thirty-three patients had operations for the control of abdominal, thoracic or vascular bleeding and 74 received immediate orthopaedic fracture fixation. Another 20 patients had combined orthopaedic and neurosurgical interventions. Three patients received no immediate emergency procedure.
Table 1
Demographic and clinical data
All patients
Survivors
Non-survivors
N
131
99 (76%)
32 (24%)
Age (years)
46 ± 18
44 ± 17
52 ± 20*
Male (n [%])
96 (73%)
72 (73%)
24 (75%)
Weight (kg)
79 ± 14
79 ± 15
78 ± 11
BMI (kg/m2)
26 ± 6
26 ± 6
27 ± 6
GCS
11 ± 4
11 ± 4
8 ± 4*
ISS
38 ± 15
36 ± 15
44 ± 15*
RTS
6.2 ± 1.5
6.5 ± 1.3
5.1 ± 1.5*
TRISS
66 ± 31
74 ± 27
46 ± 31*
RISC
71 ± 27
79 ± 22
47 ± 29*
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, or as absolute and relative frequency. * P < 0.05, significant difference between survivors and non-survivors. BMI, body mass index; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ISS, Injury Severity Score; n, number of patients; RISC, Revised Injury Severity Classification Score; RTS, Revised Trauma Score; TRISS, Trauma Injury Severity Score.
The observed mortality was 24.4%, lower than the TRISS mortality of 33.7% (P = 0.032) and the RISC mortality of 28.7% (P > 0.05; Figure 2). After excluding 17 patients with traumatic brain injury, the difference in mortality was 14% observed versus 27.8% predicted by TRISS (P = 0.0018) and 24.3% predicted by RISC (P = 0.014).
Table 2
Thromboelastometric (ROTEM) parameters
Admission at ER
Admission at ICU
EXTEM
A10 (normal range 43 to 65 mm)
40 ± 10
35 ± 9
MCF (normal range 53 to 72 mm)
50 ± 8
46 ± 8
CT (normal range 35 to 80 seconds)
78 (63, 113)
71 (54, 105)
FibTEM
A10 (normal range 7 to 23 mm)
5 (4, 7)
7 (5, 10)
MCF (normal range 9 to 25 mm)
6 (4, 8)
9 (6, 11)
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile). A10, clot amplitude at 10 minutes after the beginning of clot formation; CT, clotting time; ER, emergency room; EXTEM, extrinsically activated thromboelastography test; FibTEM, fibrin-based thromboelastometric test; MCF, maximum clot firmness.
Figure 2
Comparison of the observed mortality with the mortality predicted by the trauma injury severity score (TRISS) and by the revised injury severity classification (RISC) score. A sub-analysis that excluded patients who died of untreatable brain oedema caused by severe brain injury was also performed.
The ROTEM test results on admission to the ER and on arrival at the ICU are presented in Table 2. On admission to the ER, the mean MCF in EXTEM was 50 mm (normal range 53 to 72 mm). In the FibTEM test, the median MCF was 6 mm, lower than the normal range (9 to 25 mm). The median CT of EXTEM was within the normal range (78 seconds, normal range 35 to 80 seconds). On admission to the ICU, thromboelastometric parameters were comparable with the preoperative parameters.
The standard laboratory values are presented in Table 3. Mean plasma fibrinogen was 126 mg/dL on admission to the ER and 150 mg/dL on arrival at the ICU. The mean fibrinogen level only reached low-normal values 24 hours after admission to the ER (228 mg/dL, normal range 200 to 450 mg/dL; Figure 3).
Table 3
Standard laboratory parameters
Admission to the ER
Arrival at the ICU
24 hours after admission to the ER
Haemoglobin (13.5 to 17 g/dL)
9.6 ± 2.8
9.6 ± 2.1
9.2 ± 1.5
Haematocrit (40 to 50%)
28 ± 8
28 ± 6
27 ± 4
Platelet count (150 to 350 *1000/μL)
166 ± 64
90 ± 49
79 ± 37
PT (11 to 13.5 seconds)
20.3 ± 8.3
22.6 ± 9.9
18.8 ± 3.2
aPTT (26 to 35 seconds)
53 ± 48
69 ± 47
49 ± 21
Fibrinogen (200 to 450 mg/dL)
126 ± 65
150 ± 50
228 ± 71
aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; ER, emergency room; PT, prothrombin time. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation; normal range is indicated in parentheses.
Figure 3
Perioperative changes in plasma fibrinogen concentration. Measurements were performed on admission to the emergency room (ER), on arrival at the intensive care unit (ICU), 24 hours after admission to the ER, on the third and the seventh postoperative days. The hatched area shows the normal physiological range of plasma fibrinogen concentration. The boxes represent the interquartile range, the lines represent the mean, and the whiskers extend to 95% confidence interval for the mean. The circles represent outside values, larger that the upper quartile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the squares represent far out values, larger that the upper quartile plus three times the interquartile range.
In patients treated with fibrinogen concentrate, a median dose of 6 g was administered intraoperatively; the median cumulative dose during the first 24 hours was 7 g (Table 4). Patients who received haemostatic therapy in the ER due to the severity of bleeding received a median of 4 g as an initial dose. The maximum dose administered in the ER was 14 g. Further doses of 3 to 4 g were administered during the surgery and in the ICU. Only three of 131 patients did not receive fibrinogen concentrate. A median of six RBC units were transfused intraoperatively and a median of 10 RBC units were transfused during the first 24 hours. The median ratio of fibrinogen concentrate to RBC over the first 24 hours was 0.8 g per one unit. Despite the administration of high doses of fibrinogen concentrate, the mean postoperative fibrinogen plasma level was 150 mg/dL, which is below the normal range. In patients with prolonged CT in EXTEM, a median dose of 1800 U of PCC was administered during the operation and a median dose of 2400 U was administered during the first 24 hours (Table 4). A total of 30 patients received no PCC. Three patients with previous coumarin intake received only PCC for haemostatic therapy (between 2400 and 5400 U in 24 hours) and no fibrinogen concentrate.
Table 4
Haemostatic therapy and RBC transfusion
Total administered until arrival at ICU
Total administered during 24 hours after admission to the ER
Number of patients treated
Dose
Number of patients treated
Dose
Fibrinogen concentrate (g)
123
6 (4, 9)
128
7 (5, 11)
PCC (U)
83
1800 (1650, 3100)
101
2400 (1800, 3600)
FFP (U)
6
10 (7, 10)
12
10 (9.75, 11.25)
PC (U)
22
2 (1, 2)
29
2 (2, 3)
RBC (U)
125
6 (4, 10)
131
10 (6, 13)
Data are presented as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile). Total number of patients = 131. ER, emergency room; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; PC, platelet concentrate; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate; RBC, red blood cell concentrate.
The timing of the administration of coagulation factor concentrates is described in Table 5. Fifty-two percent of patients received these products within one hour of admission to the ER, and in most of these cases administration was within 30 minutes.
Table 5
Timing of the administration of coagulation factor concentrates
Time of administration
Number of patients
<1 hour after arrival in ER
68
1-2 hours after arrival in ER
34
2-6 hours after arrival in ER
24
6-24 hours after arrival in ER
5
ER, emergency room.
FFP was transfused in 12 patients, but always together with coagulation factor concentrates. Six of the 12 patients received FFP only postoperatively, in the ICU. Platelet concentrate was administered to 29 patients, 7 of whom received this treatment only in the ICU. Eight patients received recombinant activated factor VII and another seven received tranexamic acid/aprotinin.
Discussion
In our retrospective analysis of 131 massively traumatised and bleeding patients, ROTEM-guided haemostatic therapy with fibrinogen concentrate as first-line haemostatic therapy and additional PCC was goal directed and fast. A favourable survival rate was observed.
The benefits of fibrinogen concentrate have been demonstrated in a variety of settings including trauma [19–21, 30–33]. In massive bleeding, fibrinogen is the first factor that reaches critically low values [34, 35]. Plotkin and colleagues showed in their study that reduced clot firmness was predictive for transfusion requirements [36]. Bolliger and colleagues investigated the minimum fibrinogen concentration above which clot formation normalises, and found that fibrinogen concentrations above 200 mg/dL are required [37]. In severe trauma, low fibrinogen levels are reached very early because of the dilutional effect of pre-hospital resuscitation. The mean preoperative fibrinogen plasma concentration in our patients was 126 mg/dL (shown by a FibTEM median MCF of 6 mm). Over the 24-hour period, a cumulative median dose of 7 g fibrinogen concentrate was applied. Despite this high dose, the median postoperative plasma fibrinogen level was 150 mg/dL, which is below the normal range of laboratory values.
A second argument that may support the safety of fibrinogen supplementation is that fibrin (known as antithrombin I, and formed from fibrinogen) acts by sequestering thrombin in the incipient clot, localising the further processes of clot formation [38, 39]. Evidence of a remarkably low thrombogenic potential of fibrinogen concentrate has been recently presented by Dickneite and colleagues [40]. This study included experimental data from an animal model, and data from a 22-year pharmacovigilance program involving administration of more than 1,000,000 g of fibrinogen (Haemocomplettan P, CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany), equalling over 250,000 doses of 4 g. The reported incidence of thrombotic events possibly related to fibrinogen concentrate was 3.5 per 100,000 treatment episodes.
Fibrinogen concentrate therapy may also correct or compensate other haemostatic defects associated with haemodilution, such as decreases in platelet count or quality of fibrin polymerisation. In vitro and in vivo retrospective clinical investigations have shown that a high-normal fibrinogen level ensures satisfactory clot firmness at low platelet counts [41, 42]. In the present study, although the median platelet count on arrival at the ER was within the normal range, subsequent haemodilution and consumption resulted in abnormally low values within the following 24 hours, despite administration of platelet concentrate. A strategy to reduce allogeneic blood product administration may be developed based on the possible compensatory effect of fibrinogen concentration in the presence of low platelet counts [41, 42], but further clinical investigations are required to support this theory.
Volume replacement with crystalloids and colloids has a significant deleterious effect on clot properties, because fibrin polymerisation is impaired. This disturbance may be corrected by fibrinogen concentrate. For example, a study by Fenger-Eriksen and colleagues identified acquired fibrinogen deficiency as the main determinant of the dilutional coagulopathy induced by hydroxyethyl starches in patients undergoing total cystectomy [43]. As volume replacement in our trauma patients was also performed with such colloids, it is possible that fibrinogen concentrate therapy provided additional benefit by improving fibrin polymerisation.
PCC is recommended for emergency reversal of anticoagulation therapy [37], and its potential haemostatic value in bleeding patients without pre-existing coagulopathy has already been shown [22, 23]. In our trauma patients, PCC was administered for the correction of the coagulopathy associated with the prolongation of the clotting time in the EXTEM test. PCC administration represented the second step of haemostatic therapy, and followed the administration of fibrinogen concentrate, which was aimed at correcting the decreased clot firmness. Combined administration of fibrinogen concentrate and PCC for correction of coagulopathy has already been investigated in a porcine trauma model [30], but until now this therapeutic approach has only been described in a single case report [44].
FFP is advocated for haemostatic therapy in patients with prolonged PT or aPTT [3]. However, there is a lack of evidence demonstrating that FFP controls blood loss [5, 21]. Chowdhury and colleagues showed that 12 mL per kg bodyweight did not sufficiently increase the concentration of the coagulation factors [45]. Moreover, there are risks associated with FFP, such as transfusion-related acute lung injury, transfusion-related immunosuppression and pathogen transmission. Transfusion has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality [15–17, 46–48] and these risks provide a rationale for minimising allogeneic transfusion. Furthermore, early and aggressive treatment of coagulopathy is essential in trauma patients, and it is questionable whether FFP treatment is compatible with this need. A study by Snyder and colleagues showed that the first FFP was given at a median of 93 minutes after arrival of the patient in the ER [49]. In contrast, 52% of the patients in our study received the first dose of fibrinogen concentrate within the first hour, most of them within 30 minutes. In addition, fibrinogen concentrate provides more effective increases in plasma fibrinogen concentrations within a short time interval. Within a few minutes 6 g of fibrinogen can be administered, and in our clinic coagulation factor concentrates are stored in the ER making them readily available. In contrast, the transfusion of FFP is time-consuming as delivery from the blood service and thawing are required, and there is a high volume load. Faster treatment with coagulation factor concentrates may be one reason for the favourable survival rate that we observed. It is also possible that the avoidance of the side effects of FFP contributed to this finding. Unlike FFP, coagulation factor concentrates undergo viral inactivation steps such as pasteurisation during their manufacture, minimising the risk of pathogen transmission.
It has been shown in the literature that 'blind' coagulation management (without point-of-care guidance) underestimates the real demand for coagulation factors in situations of severe bleeding [50]. Goal-directed coagulation treatment of severely bleeding patients necessitates quick and reliable coagulation monitoring, and a targeted therapeutic approach according to the test results [50]. Commonly used standard coagulation tests (PT and aPTT) are time-consuming and offer poor insight into the complex coagulopathy associated with high blood loss, factor consumption and haemodilution [51, 52]. This makes them unsuited to guide therapeutic decisions in emergency settings. In contrast, ROTEM and thrombelastography support an accurate and timely assessment of not only the clotting initiation process, but also clot quality [24–26, 53, 54]. In animal models as well as in human studies, thrombelastography has been shown to be a reliable monitoring tool that detects clinically relevant clotting abnormalities associated with bleeding [55, 56]. In a study that included 69 trauma patients, Kaufman and colleagues showed that only the ISS and the thrombelastography results were predictive of early transfusion requirements [25]. Furthermore, this methodology provides immediate results and consequently allows for the treatment to be tailored to patients' changing needs. The number of publications reporting or encouraging the use of ROTEM and thrombelastography for the guidance of haemostatic therapy is increasing continuously, including results in the trauma setting [31, 44, 57–61]. ROTEM tests have even been used to establish the dosage of haemostatic products [33, 62] and to support the licensing procedure of fibrinogen concentrates [63]. Yet, although treatment algorithms based on ROTEM test results have been published, randomised controlled trials adopting such algorithms are not available at the moment [58, 61].
Another advantage of the application of ROTEM- or thrombelastography-based algorithms is their potential to reduce transfusion and associated costs and their positive impact on patient outcome. The recently published 11th Health Technology Assessment reports on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of thrombelastography and thromboelastometry analysers compared with standard laboratory tests. This assessment recommends the use of these viscoelastic analyzers not only because of cost-effectiveness, but also because it can reduce the need for inappropriate transfusions and decrease blood product requirements. Overall, the report concludes that thrombelastography and thromboelastometry appear to have a positive impact on patient's health by reducing the number of deaths, complications and infections [64].
In the present study, observed mortality was significantly lower than the mortality predicted by TRISS (24.4% vs 33.7%). The difference may be the result of multiple factors related to the management of trauma patients in our clinic, and therapy with coagulation factor concentrates could be one of these factors. The observation that the differences in mortality were even higher after exclusion of the patients with traumatic brain injury supports this assumption, because this group of patients was at risk because of uncontrollable brain oedema and not hypocoagulability. However, with the present study design, the impact of the haemostatic therapy algorithm on survival rate cannot be assessed separately. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of the lower observed mortality compared with the TRISS-predicted mortality must be weighed in view of the limitations of the TRISS score [65]. Although this score is used as a benchmark for mortality in the trauma setting, some trauma centres have reported observed mortality rates below those predicted by TRISS [65–67]. The greatest reduction in observed mortality versus the mortality predicted by TRISS (22% vs 29%) was reported by Hirschmann and colleagues in a Swiss study of 172 university hospital patients with ISS of more than 15 [66]. The differences between the observed and predicted mortality may be influenced by inaccuracies of the TRISS score, the level of specialisation of the trauma care institution and by improvements in trauma care other than coagulation management. To circumvent these limitations, observed mortality was also compared with the mortality predicted by the recently developed RISC score that combines age, New Injury Severity Score, head injury, severe pelvic injury, GCS, PTT, base excess, cardiac arrest, and indirect signs of bleeding (shock, mass transfusion and low haemoglobin) [29]. In development and validation patient samples, the RISC score reached significantly higher values for receiver operating characteristic curves compared with TRISS [29]. When applied to the patients included in the present study, this score revealed mortality rates lower than TRISS-predicted mortality, in agreement with initial reports [29]. More importantly, RISC-predicted mortality was still higher than the observed mortality, and the difference reached statistical significance for the analysis that excluded patients with traumatic brain injury. Although this finding does not prove an association of the treatment algorithm with improved survival, it supports the assumption that trauma care incorporating ROTEM-based haemostatic therapy with coagulation factor concentrates is not detrimental to patients.
A number of factors may have contributed to the favourable survival rate: the promptness of the coagulation assessment (ROTEM results available in 10 to 15 minutes), the fast application of haemostatic therapy (half of the patients received goal-directed haemostatic therapy within less than one hour after arrival in the ER) and the high fibrinogen to RBC ratio (0.8 g: 1 unit over the first 24 hours). Regarding the latter factor, there have already been reports on the positive impact on survival that a high fibrinogen to RBC ratio may have. The retrospective analysis performed by Stinger and colleagues, which included 252 patients who received a massive transfusion (>10 units of RBCs in 24 hours), showed a lower incidence of death from haemorrhage in the group of patients receiving more than 0.2 g fibrinogen per RBC unit (mean amount of fibrinogen administered: 0.48 g fibrinogen per RBC unit) [19]. The amount of fibrinogen administered was calculated retrospectively as the total content of fibrinogen in the different types of blood products administered (i.e. FFP, platelet concentrates, cryoprecipitate, fresh whole blood and RBC). In our patients, the ratio fibrinogen to RBC was 0.8, nearly twice the ratio reported by Stinger and colleagues, but improvement of the fibrinogen level represented a central part of the therapeutic approach.
The main limitation of the present study is represented by its retrospective, uncontrolled nature that does not support an adequate estimation of the impact that therapy with coagulation factor concentrates may have had on mortality. A retrospective analysis of data before the introduction of thromboelastometry did not appear reasonable, because a variety of treatment protocols changed. The study did not assess outcome parameters apart from mortality, nor did it include comparison with non-ROTEM-guided haemostatic therapy. The present study was conducted over a fairly long time period (2005 to 2009), during which our experience with ROTEM-based coagulation therapy has increased and important changes in the clinic's standard transfusion protocols occurred. This is reflected by the fact that half of the 12 patients with FFP transfusion belong to the period 2005 to 2006. A clear reduction in intraoperative FFP transfusion occurred from 2006 and, in the following years, FFP has been mainly administered in isolated cases in the ICU at the intensivist's discretion. The same pattern was followed by therapy with recombinant activated factor VII: our records show no administration of this product in severe trauma patients after the middle of 2007.
Conclusions
ROTEM-guided haemostatic therapy with fibrinogen concentrate as first-line haemostatic therapy and additional use of PCC was goal directed, efficacious, and quick to administer. Thromboelastometry allowed rapid and reliable diagnosis of the underlying coagulopathy. Given the favourable survival rate observed, the present data encourage prospective randomized studies based on this treatment strategy.
Key messages
The present study describes goal-directed haemostatic therapy of haemorrhage in severe trauma patients, in whom the administration of coagulation factor concentrates was tailored to correct the haemostatic defects identified by thromboelastometric analyses.
The results show that coagulation factor concentrates (fibrinogen concentrate as first-line haemostatic therapy and additional PCC) can be used successfully in trauma patients with severe bleeding.
Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) allowed rapid and reliable diagnosis of the underlying coagulopathy and guided the haemostatic therapy.
Observed mortality appeared lower than the mortality predicted by the TRISS and by the RISC score.
This treatment strategy may reduce allogeneic blood product transfusion, and prospective, randomized studies appear warranted.
Abbreviations
APTT:
activated partial thromboplastin time
CT:
clotting time
ER:
emergency room
FFP:
fresh frozen plasma
GCS:
Glasgow Coma Scale
ISS:
Injury Severity Score
MCF:
maximum clot firmness
PCC:
prothrombin complex concentrate
PT:
prothrombin time
RBC:
red blood cell
SHOT:
Serious Hazards of Transfusion
TRALI:
transfusion-related acute lung injury
TRISS:
trauma injury severity score.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. Gerald Hochleitner for his skilled technical assistance.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, AUVA Trauma Hospital
(2)
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology
(3)
Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, University of Witten/HerdeckeCologne-Merheim Medical Center
(4)
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich University Hospital
(5)
Clinical Division B, Department of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Vienna Medical University
(6)
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Salzburger Landeskliniken SALK
Maegele M, Lefering R, Yucel N, Tjardes T, Rixen D, Paffrath T, Simanski C, Neugebauer E, Bouillon B: Early coagulopathy in multiple injury: an analysis from the German Trauma Registry on 8724 patients.Injury 2007, 38: 298-304. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.10.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Spahn DR, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernandez-Mondejar E, Gordini G, Stahel PF, Hunt BJ, Komadina R, Neugebauer E, Ozier Y, Riddez L, Schultz A, Vincent JL, Rossaint R: Management of bleeding following major trauma: a European guideline.Crit Care 2007, 11: R17. 10.1186/cc5686PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stainsby D, MacLennan S, Thomas D, Isaac J, Hamilton PJ: Guidelines on the management of massive blood loss.Br J Haematol 2006, 135: 634-641. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06355.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Repine T, Beekley AC, Sebesta J, Jenkins D, Wade CE, Holcomb JB: The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital.J Trauma 2007, 63: 805-813. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181271ba3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gunter OL Jr, Au BK, Isbell JM, Mowery NT, Young PP, Cotton BA: Optimizing outcomes in damage control resuscitation: identifying blood product ratios associated with improved survival.J Trauma 2008, 65: 527-534. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181826ddfView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hess JR, Dutton RB, Holcomb JB, Scalea TM: Giving plasma at a 1:1 ratio with red cells in resuscitation: who might benefit?Transfusion 2008, 48: 1763-1765. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01743.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Haenel J, Wilson M, Moore JB, Cothren CC, Biffl WL, Banerjee A, Sauaia A: Postinjury life threatening coagulopathy: is 1:1 fresh frozen plasma:packed red blood cells the answer?J Trauma 2008, 65: 261-270. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817de3e1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Maegele M, Lefering R, Paffrath T, Tjardes T, Simanski C, Bouillon B: Red-blood-cell to plasma ratios transfused during massive transfusion are associated with mortality in severe multiple injury: a retrospective analysis from the Trauma Registry of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Unfallchirurgie.Vox Sang 2008, 95: 112-119. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01074.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Scalea TM, Bochicchio KM, Lumpkins K, Hess JR, Dutton R, Pyle A, Bochicchio GV: Early aggressive use of fresh frozen plasma does not improve outcome in critically injured trauma patients.Ann Surg 2008, 248: 578-584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sperry JL, Ochoa JB, Gunn SR, Alarcon LH, Minei JP, Cuschieri J, Rosengart MR, Maier RV, Billiar TR, Peitzman AB, Moore EE: An FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio >/= 1:1.5 is associated with a lower risk of mortality after massive transfusion.J Trauma 2008, 65: 986-993. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181878028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Beekley AC, Niles SE, McLaughlin DF, Wade CE, Holcomb JB: Effect of plasma and red blood cell transfusions on survival in patients with combat related traumatic injuries.J Trauma 2008, 64: S69-77. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160ba2fView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Shulman I, Salim A, Demetriades D, Brown C, Browder T, Green D, Rhee P: Impact of plasma transfusion in massively transfused trauma patients.J Trauma 2009, 66: 693-697. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817e5c77View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chaiwat O, Lang JD, Vavilala MS, Wang J, MacKenzie EJ, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP: Early packed red blood cell transfusion and acute respiratory distress syndrome after trauma.Anesthesiology 2009, 110: 351-360. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181948a97View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sarani B, Dunkman WJ, Dean L, Sonnad S, Rohrbach JI, Gracias VH: Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma in critically ill surgical patients is associated with an increased risk of infection.Crit Care Med 2008, 36: 1114-1118. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318168f89dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stainsby D, Jones H, Asher D, Atterbury C, Boncinelli A, Brant L, Chapman CE, Davison K, Gerrard R, Gray A, Knowles S, Love EM, Milkins C, McClelland DB, Norfolk DR, Soldan K, Taylor C, Revill J, Williamson LM, Cohen H: Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK.Transfus Med Rev 2006, 20: 273-282. 10.1016/j.tmrv.2006.05.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stinger HK, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Salinas J, Martini WZ, Hess JR, Dubick MA, Simon CD, Beekley AC, Wolf SE, Wade CE, Holcomb JB: The ratio of fibrinogen to red cells transfused affects survival in casualties receiving massive transfusions at an army combat support hospital.J Trauma 2008, 64: S79-85. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160a57bView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Danes AF, Cuenca LG, Bueno SR, Mendarte Barrenechea L, Ronsano JB: Efficacy and tolerability of human fibrinogen concentrate administration to patients with acquired fibrinogen deficiency and active or in high-risk severe bleeding.Vox Sang 2008, 94: 221-226. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.01024.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fenger-Eriksen C, Lindberg-Larsen M, Christensen AQ, Ingerslev J, Sorensen B: Fibrinogen concentrate substitution therapy in patients with massive haemorrhage and low plasma fibrinogen concentrations.Br J Anaesth 2008, 101: 769-773. 10.1093/bja/aen270View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bruce D, Nokes TJ: Prothrombin complex concentrate (Beriplex P/N) in severe bleeding: experience in a large tertiary hospital.Crit Care 2008, 12: R105. 10.1186/cc6987PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Schick KS, Fertmann JM, Jauch KW, Hoffmann JN: Prothrombin complex concentrate in surgical patients: retrospective evaluation of vitamin K antagonist reversal and treatment of severe bleeding.Crit Care 2009, 13: R191. 10.1186/cc8186PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ganter MT, Hofer CK: Coagulation monitoring: current techniques and clinical use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation devices.Anesth Analg 2008, 106: 1366-1375. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b367View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann CR, Dwyer KM, Crews JD, Dols SJ, Trask AL: Usefulness of thrombelastography in assessment of trauma patient coagulation.J Trauma 1997, 42: 716-720. 10.1097/00005373-199704000-00023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rugeri L, Levrat A, David JS, Delecroix E, Floccard B, Gros A, Allaouchiche B, Negrier C: Diagnosis of early coagulation abnormalities in trauma patients by rotation thrombelastography.J Thromb Haemost 2007, 5: 289-295. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02319.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lang T, Bauters A, Braun SL, Potzsch B, von Pape KW, Kolde HJ, Lakner M: Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM thromboelastometry.Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005, 16: 301-310. 10.1097/01.mbc.0000169225.31173.19View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Davis EG, MacKenzie EJ, Sacco WJ, Bain LW Jr, Buckman RF Jr, Champion HR, Lees PS: A new "TRISS-like" probability of survival model for intubated trauma patients.J Trauma 2003, 55: 53-61. 10.1097/01.TA.0000075340.22097.B5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lefering R: Development and validation of the revised injury severity classification score for severely injured patients.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2009, 35: 437-447. 10.1007/s00068-009-9122-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fries D, Haas T, Klingler A, Streif W, Klima G, Martini J, Wagner-Berger H, Innerhofer P: Efficacy of fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate used to reverse dilutional coagulopathy--a porcine model.Br J Anaesth 2006, 97: 460-467. 10.1093/bja/ael191View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Nielsen VG, Levy JH: Fibrinogen and bleeding: old molecule--new ideas.Anesth Analg 2007, 105: 902-903. 10.1213/01.ane.0000286775.33975.6eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rahe-Meyer N, Pichlmaier M, Haverich A, Solomon C, Winterhalter M, Piepenbrock S, Tanaka KA: Bleeding management with fibrinogen concentrate targeting a high-normal plasma fibrinogen level: a pilot study.Br J Anaesth 2009, 102: 785-792. 10.1093/bja/aep089PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hiippala ST, Myllyla GJ, Vahtera EM: Hemostatic factors and replacement of major blood loss with plasma-poor red cell concentrates.Anesth Analg 1995, 81: 360-365. 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00026PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lampl L, Seifried E, Tisch M, Helm M, Maier B, Bock KH: [Hemostatic disorders following polytrauma--the role of physiologic coagulation inhibitors during the preclinical phase].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1992, 27: 31-36. 10.1055/s-2007-1000248View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Plotkin AJ, Wade CE, Jenkins DH, Smith KA, Noe JC, Park MS, Perkins JG, Holcomb JB: A reduction in clot formation rate and strength assessed by thrombelastography is indicative of transfusion requirements in patients with penetrating injuries.J Trauma 2008, 64: S64-68. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160772dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bolliger D, Szlam F, Molinaro RJ, Rahe-Meyer N, Levy JH, Tanaka KA: Finding the optimal concentration range for fibrinogen replacement after severe haemodilution: an in vitro model.Br J Anaesth 2009, 102: 793-799. 10.1093/bja/aep098View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mosesson MW: Antithrombin I. Inhibition of thrombin generation in plasma by fibrin formation.Thromb Haemost 2003, 89: 9-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sniecinski RM, Chen EP, Tanaka KA: Reduced levels of fibrin (antithrombin I) and antithrombin III underlie coagulopathy following complex cardiac surgery.Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2008, 19: 178-179. 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3282f40d4aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Dickneite G, Pragst I, Joch C, Bergman GE: Animal model and clinical evidence indicating low thrombogenic potential of fibrinogen concentrate (Haemocomplettan P).Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2009, in press. 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832da1c5Google Scholar
Lang T, Johanning K, Metzler H, Piepenbrock S, Solomon C, Rahe-Meyer N, Tanaka KA: The effects of fibrinogen levels on thromboelastometric variables in the presence of thrombocytopenia.Anesth Analg 2009, 108: 751-758. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181966675View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Velik-Salchner C, Haas T, Innerhofer P, Streif W, Nussbaumer W, Klingler A, Klima G, Martinowitz U, Fries D: The effect of fibrinogen concentrate on thrombocytopenia.J Thromb Haemost 2007, 5: 1019-1025. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02481.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Schöchl H: Coagulation management in major trauma.Hamostaseologie 2006, 26: S52-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury P, Saayman AG, Paulus U, Findlay GP, Collins PW: Efficacy of standard dose and 30 ml/kg fresh frozen plasma in correcting laboratory parameters of haemostasis in critically ill patients.Br J Haematol 2004, 125: 69-73. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04868.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Dara SI, Rana R, Afessa B, Moore SB, Gajic O: Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in critically ill medical patients with coagulopathy.Crit Care Med 2005, 33: 2667-2671. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000186745.53059.F0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Etemadrezaie H, Baharvahdat H, Shariati Z, Lari SM, Shakeri MT, Ganjeifar B: The effect of fresh frozen plasma in severe closed head injury.Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007, 109: 166-171. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.09.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Khan H, Belsher J, Yilmaz M, Afessa B, Winters JL, Moore SB, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O: Fresh-frozen plasma and platelet transfusions are associated with development of acute lung injury in critically ill medical patients.Chest 2007, 131: 1308-1314. 10.1378/chest.06-3048View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Snyder CW, Weinberg JA, McGwin G Jr, Melton SM, George RL, Reiff DA, Cross JM, Hubbard-Brown J, Rue LW, Kerby JD: The relationship of blood product ratio to mortality: survival benefit or survival bias?J Trauma 2009, 66: 358-362. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318196c3acView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kitchens CS: To bleed or not to bleed? Is that the question for the PTT?J Thromb Haemost 2005, 3: 2607-2611. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01552.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Dempfle CE, Borggrefe M: Point of care coagulation tests in critically ill patients.Semin Thromb Hemost 2008, 34: 445-450. 10.1055/s-0028-1092874View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jackson GN, Ashpole KJ, Yentis SM: The TEG vs the ROTEM thromboelastography/thromboelastometry systems.Anaesthesia 2009, 64: 212-215. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05752.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kheirabadi BS, Crissey JM, Deguzman R, Holcomb JB: In vivo bleeding time and in vitro thrombelastography measurements are better indicators of dilutional hypothermic coagulopathy than prothrombin time.J Trauma 2007, 62: 1352-1359. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318047b805View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Martini WZ, Cortez DS, Dubick MA, Park MS, Holcomb JB: Thrombelastography is better than PT, aPTT, and activated clotting time in detecting clinically relevant clotting abnormalities after hypothermia, hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation in pigs.J Trauma 2008, 65: 535-543. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818379a6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fenger-Eriksen C, Jensen TM, Kristensen BS, Jensen KM, Tonnesen E, Ingerslev J, Sorensen B: Fibrinogen substitution improves whole blood clot firmness after dilution with hydroxyethyl starch in bleeding patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.J Thromb Haemost 2009, 7: 795-802. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03331.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fries D, Innerhofer P, Schobersberger W: Time for changing coagulation management in trauma-related massive bleeding.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009, 22: 267-274. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832678d9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gerlach R, Krause M, Seifert V, Goerlinger K: Hemostatic and hemorrhagic problems in neurosurgical patients.Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009, 151: 873-900. 10.1007/s00701-009-0409-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Le T, Lawrence J, Pezold M, Johnson JL, Cothren CC, Biffl WL, Barnett C, Sabel A: Noncitrated whole blood is optimal for evaluation of postinjury coagulopathy with point-of-care rapid thrombelastography.J Surg Res 2009, 156: 133-138. 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.046View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Theusinger OM, Spahn DR, Ganter MT: Transfusion in trauma: why and how should we change our current practice?Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009, 22: 305-312. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283212c7cView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rahe-Meyer N, Solomon C, Winterhalter M, Piepenbrock S, Tanaka K, Haverich A, Pichlmaier M: Thromboelastometry-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate for the treatment of excessive intraoperative bleeding in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 138: 694-702. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.065View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Craig J, Aguiar-Ibanez R, Bhattacharya S, Downie S, Duff S, Kohli H, Nimmo A, Trueman P, Wilson S, Yunni Y: The clinical and cost effectiveness of thromboelastography/thromboelastometry.Health Technol Assess 2008, 11: 1-70.Google Scholar
Moore L, Lavoie A, Turgeon AF, Abdous B, Le Sage N, Emond M, Liberman M, Bergeron E: The trauma risk adjustment model: a new model for evaluating trauma care.Ann Surg 2009, 249: 1040-1046. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a6cd97View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann MT, Uike KN, Kaufmann M, Huegli R, Regazzoni P, Gross T: Quality management of interdisciplinary treatment of polytrauma. Possibilities and limits of retrospective routine data collection.Anaesthesist 2007, 56: 673-678. 10.1007/s00101-007-1192-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sanson G, Di Bartolomeo S, Nardi G, Albanese P, Diani A, Raffin L, Filippetto C, Cattarossi A, Scian E, Rizzi L: Road traffic accidents with vehicular entrapment: incidence of major injuries and need for advanced life support.Eur J Emerg Med 1999, 6: 285-291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
