/v1/supplement/title
Open Access

Mild therapeutic hypothermia shortens intensive care unit stay of survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to historical controls

  • Christian Storm1,
  • Ingo Steffen1,
  • Joerg C Schefold1,
  • Anne Krueger1,
  • Michael Oppert1,
  • Achim Jörres1 and
  • Dietrich Hasper1Email author
Critical Care200812:R78

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6925

Received: 7 April 2008

Accepted: 14 June 2008

Published: 14 June 2008

Abstract

Introduction

Persistent coma is a common finding after cardiac arrest and has profound ethical and economic implications. Evidence suggests that therapeutic hypothermia improves neurological outcome in these patients. In this analysis, we investigate whether therapeutic hypothermia influences the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and ventilator time in patients surviving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods

A prospective observational study with historical controls was conducted at our medical ICU. Fifty-two consecutive patients (median age 62.6 years, 43 males, 34 ventricular fibrillation) submitted to therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were included. They were compared with a historical cohort (n = 74, median age 63.8 years, 53 males, 43 ventricular fibrillation) treated in the era prior to hypothermia treatment. All patients received the same standard of care. Neurological outcome was assessed using the Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) score. Univariate analyses and multiple regression models were used.

Results

In survivors, therapeutic hypothermia and baseline disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II [APACHE II] score) were both found to significantly influence ICU stay and ventilator time (all P < 0.01). ICU stay was shorter in survivors receiving therapeutic hypothermia (median 14 days [interquartile range (IQR) 8 to 26] versus 21 days [IQR 15 to 30] in the control group; P = 0.017). ICU length of stay and time on ventilator were prolonged in patients with CPC 3 or 4 compared with patients with CPC 1 or 2 (P = 0.003 and P = 0.034, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved probability for 1-year survival in the hypothermia group compared with the controls (log-rank test P = 0.013).

Conclusion

Therapeutic hypothermia was found to significantly shorten ICU stay and time of mechanical ventilation in survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Moreover, profound improvements in both neurological outcome and 1-year survival were observed.

Introduction

Persistent coma is a common finding after cardiac arrest and has profound ethical and economic implications. In a significant proportion of patients, neurological status rather than specific treatment of the underlying disease affects the outcome after cardiac arrest [1]. Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that therapeutic hypothermia is highly effective in improving the neurological outcome in patients after cardiac arrest [2, 3]. In 2003, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recommended this treatment for all comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation [4]. Although only a minority of such patients are currently treated with therapeutic hypothermia [5, 6], recent efforts aim to implement therapeutic hypothermia as a routine procedure in patients after cardiac arrest [7].

The optimal method for controlled and safe application of therapeutic hypothermia is still under debate [8, 9]. For intravascular cooling devices as well as for device-controlled surface cooling methods, the efficacy has been demonstrated in different trials [1013]. Of course, other cooling methods like crushed-ice, towels pre-soaked in ice water, or simple cooling blankets may be very effective as well but the temperature range is more difficult to control [14, 15]. For out-of-hospital cooling, new devices and methods for fast induction of hypothermia are of increasing importance [16, 17]. However, using advanced cooling methods, equipment, and manpower required for the application of therapeutic hypothermia generates higher treatment costs. Length of intensive care unit stay (ICU LOS) has been identified as a major determinant of total treatment costs after survived cardiac arrest [18]. Therefore, it was investigated whether therapeutic hypothermia influences ICU LOS and time of mechanical ventilation in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Materials and methods

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee on human research. The need for informed patient consent was waived by the committee. We conducted our study in an urban area with a two-tiered medical emergency system: basic life support, including automated defibrillation, is offered by ambulances, and advanced life support procedures were performed by qualified emergency physicians at the mobile ICU. All patients with cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in the field were directly admitted to our medical ICU (MICU). Pre-hospital cooling procedures were not applied during the study period.

Between January 2006 and January 2007, a total of 52 patients were admitted to our MICU after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. All patients received therapeutic hypothermia according to the current ILCOR recommendations. A historical control group in the era prior to hypothermia treatment was identified in a cohort of 74 patients admitted to our MICU between 2003 and 2005 after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Detailed characteristics for all study patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the patient population and results of the univariate analysis

 

Control

Hypothermia

P value

 

(n = 74)

(n = 52)

 

Age, years

63.8 (52.8–72.0)

62.6 (50.7–71.4)

0.776

Gender

   

   Female

21 (28.4)

9 (17.3)

0.221

   Male

53 (71.6)

43 (82.7)

 

APACHE II score

25.0 (20.0–30.0)

30.5 (22.5–33.0)

0.015

Cardiac arrest

   

   Shockable rhythm

43 (58.1)

34 (65.4)

0.523

   Non-shockable rhythm

31 (41.9)

18 (34.6)

 

Cause of cardiac arrest

   

   Acute myocardial infarction

47 (63.5)

31 (59.6)

 

   Primary arrhythmia

12 (16.2)

13 (25)

 

   Respiratory

12 (16.2)

8 (15.4)

 

   Other

3 (4.1)

0

 

Bystander CPR

   

   Yes

12 (16.2)

16 (30.8)

0.086

   No

62 (83.8)

36 (69.2)

 

Time to ROSC, minutes

20 (18–25)

20 (14–22)

0.230

Total epinephrine dose, mg

3.0 (2.0–4.0)

2.75 (0.8–3.1)

0.106

Length of ICU stay, days

   

   All patients

15 (7–26)

13 (8–26)

0.947

   Non-survivors

7 (5–10)

9 (6–22)

0.259

   Survivors

21 (15–30)

14 (8–26)

0.017

Time on ventilator, hours

   

   All patients

217 (139–353)

220 (124–428)

1

   Non-survivors

165 (104–210)

221 (133–365)

0.219

   Survivors

328 (208–461)

219 (125–447)

0.113

Leukocytes at day 3,/nL

11.0 (8.7–13.6)

12.2 (8.3–14.1)

0.91

C-reactive protein at day 3, mg/dL

12.7 (7.5–16.0)

14.5 (8.7–21.1)

0.33

Radiological signs of pneumonia

8 (10.8)

10 (19.2)

0.205

CPC at ICU discharge

   

   1 – good recovery

8 (10.8)

22 (42.3)

 

   2 – moderate disability

9 (12.2)

10 (19.2)

 

   3 – severe disability

3 (4.1)

2 (3.8)

 

   4 – vegetative state

23 (31.1)

3 (5.8)

 

   5 – death

31 (41.9)

15 (28.8)

 

CPC 1–2 versus 3–5

   

   CPC 1–2

17 (23.0)

32 (61.5)

<0.001

   CPC 3–5

57 (77.0)

20 (38.5)

 

Died during hospital stay

   

   Yes

31 (41.9)

15 (28.8)

0.190

   No

43 (58.1)

37 (71.2)

 

Data are presented as medians (25th and 75th percentiles) or as absolute numbers (relative frequencies). APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; CPC, cerebral performance category; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICU, intensive care unit; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.

Therapeutic hypothermia was initiated after admission with an intravenous infusion of cold saline (4°C, 1,000 to 1,500 mL bolus) followed by surface cooling with commercially available non-invasive devices (CritiCool®; MTRE, Yavne, Rehovot, Israel, or ArcticSun2000®; Medivance, Inc., Louisville, CO, USA). After the start of cooling, the target temperature of 33°C was reached in a range of 180 to 300 minutes and maintained for 24 hours. Re-warming was performed at a rate of 0.25°C per hour. Intravenous sedation was induced in all patients by a combination of midazolam (0.125 mg/kg per hour) and fentanyl (0.002 mg/kg per hour) with dose adjustment as needed. Patients undergoing hypothermia received muscle relaxation with repetitive pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg) administration in order to prevent shivering. All patients completed therapeutic hypothermia without complications or overcooling. With the exception of therapeutic hypothermia, there was no further difference in the standard of intensive care treatment between the two groups. To discover early-onset infection and pneumonia, laboratory markers of systemic inflammation (c-reactive protein/leukocyte count) and radiological findings of pneumonia in chest x-ray were analyzed on day 3. Neurological outcome was assessed at the time of discharge from the ICU according to the Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) score [19]. CPC 1 and 2 were classified as a favorable neurological outcome, whereas CPC 3 and 4 were regarded as an unfavorable outcome.

The SPSS software (version 13.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R (version 2.4.1; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) were used for statistical analysis. Descriptive parameters are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) (25th to 75th percentiles). Univariate analysis of differences between hypothermia patients and the control group was performed by using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric unpaired data and the Fisher exact test for dichotomous variables. Multiple regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders and to analyze the association of one dependent and several independent variables. The general linear start model includes all independent variables, whereas the final model contains only predictive factors after using the automatic method of stepwise backward selection. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison between groups was performed by the log-rank test.

Results

Univariate analysis

Results of univariate analysis of all patients (n = 126) are presented in Table 1. Concerning age (P = 0.776) and gender (P = 0.221), no significant differences were observed between patients in the hypothermia group and the control group. However, APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score on admission was significantly lower in the control group (P = 0.015). No significant differences were calculated concerning the first documented rhythm (P = 0.523), dosage of epinephrine during resuscitation (P = 0.106), and time to ROSC (P = 0.230). Patients with initial ventricular fibrillation were classified as primary shockable rhythm, whereas patients with asystole and pulseless electrical activity were classified as primary non-shockable rhythm.

Univariate analysis of ICU LOS for all patients (dead and alive) showed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.947). However, if only survivors were analyzed, ICU LOS was significantly lower in the hypothermia group (median 14 days [IQR 8 to 26] versus 21 days [IQR 15 to 30]; P = 0.017) (Figure 1). In contrast to this finding, there was no statistically significant difference regarding ICU LOS in patients who died during ICU stay (median 9 days [IQR 6 to 22] for the hypothermia group and 7 days [IQR 5 to 10] for the control group; P = 0.250).
Figure 1

Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and time on ventilator in the study groups. Boxplot of ICU length of stay (left) and time on ventilator (right) in survivors of the hypothermia (n = 23) and the control (n = 43) group.

Univariate analysis of ventilator time revealed no significant difference for all patients (P = 1). Median ventilator time was lower in the subgroup of survivors treated with hypothermia, although the difference was not statistically significant (219 hours [IQR 125 to 447] for the hypothermia group versus 328 hours [IQR 208 to 461] for the control group; P = 0.113) (Figure 1). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in ventilator time in the subgroup of non-survivors (221 hours [IQR 133 to 365] for the hypothermia group and 165 hours [IQR 104 to 210] for the control group; P = 0.219).

C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and radiological diagnosis of early-onset pneumonia on day 3 were not statistically different between the groups (Table 1). With regard to the neurological outcome, both ICU LOS and time on ventilator were significantly longer in patients with a CPC 3 or 4 compared with patients with CPC 1 or 2 (P = 0.003 for LOS and P = 0.034 for ventilator time) (Figure 2). Hypothermia treatment was associated with significantly improved neurological outcome assessed by CPC 1 or 2 versus 3 or 4 (P < 0.001). The results of the univariate analysis are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 2

Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and time on ventilator and neurological outcome. Boxplot of ICU length of stay (left) and time on ventilator (right) of the study population (n = 126) according to the neurological outcome assessed as cerebral performance category (CPC).

Multivariate analysis

As univariate analysis showed significant differences between the hypothermia and the control group, an adjustment for confounders was performed. To this end, ICU LOS and respirator time were analyzed with the multivariate regression model, including gender, age, APACHE II score, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), time to ROSC, initial rhythm, and mild therapeutic hypothermia treatment as independent factors. The final model for ICU LOS in the subgroup of survivors identified a low APACHE II score (P = 0.006) and hypothermia treatment (P = 0.004) as independent predictors of shorter ICU LOS.

Likewise, multivariate analysis in the subgroup of survivors identified APACHE II score (P = 0.009) and hypothermia treatment (P = 0.026) as independent predictors of shorter time on mechanical ventilation. The complete results of the multivariate analyses are presented in Table 2. Follow-up data for 1-year survival probability were performed including all patients (n = 126). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a probability for 365-day survival of 55.1% (confidence interval [CI] 39.1% to 68.5%) in the hypothermia group compared with 30.8% (CI 19.9% to 42.3%) in the control group. The log-rank test was significant (P = 0.013) (Figure 3).
Table 2

Multivariate analysis

 

Coefficient

5% CI

95% CI

P value

Start model (ICU LOS)

    

(Intercept)

7.84

-17.32

33.01

0.543

Gender female

-4.72

-14.12

4.67

0.328

Age

0.08

-0.19

0.36

0.553

APACHE II score

0.66

0.18

1.13

0.008

Hypothermia treatment

-10.63

-17.93

-3.32

0.006

Bystander CPR

-1.69

-9.57

6.20

0.676

Ventricular fibrillation

0.95

-6.71

8.61

0.809

Time to ROSC

-0.12

-0.73

0.49

0.706

Final model (ICU LOS)

    

(Intercept)

10.80

-0.64

22.24

0.068

APACHE II score

0.63

0.19

1.07

0.006

Hypothermia treatment

-10.66

-17.73

-3.59

0.004

Start model (time on ventilator)

    

(Intercept)

161.45

-409.67

732.58

0.581

Gender female

2.11

-212.22

216.44

0.985

Age

0.67

-5.40

6.74

0.830

APACHE II score

13.40

3.07

23.74

0.013

Hypothermia treatment

-182.72

-342.75

-22.69

0.028

Bystander CPR

-73.32

-245.39

98.75

0.407

Time to ROSC

-5.16

-19.03

8.71

0.469

Ventricular fibrillation

22.19

-145.07

189.46

0.780

Final model (time on ventilator)

    

(Intercept)

107.25

-142.68

357.17

0.403

APACHE II score

13.07

3.58

22.57

0.009

Hypothermia treatment

-179.41

-333.73

-25.09

0.026

Regression coefficients, associated confidence intervals, and P values of start multiple regression model and final model after stepwise backward selection. Sign (- or +) indicates negative or positive effect on the dependent variable. APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; CI, confidence interval; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICU LOS, intensive care unit length of stay; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.

Figure 3

One-year survival of the study population. Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival analysis of both study groups.

Discussion

Mild therapeutic hypothermia is recommended by current ILCOR guidelines and has become an essential part in post-resuscitation care. Although the benefit concerning neurological outcome could not be demonstrated in a few single centers, most other trials could show an improved neurological outcome under hypothermia even in unselected effectiveness trials [20, 21]. Nevertheless, technical, logistical, and financial barriers may limit the transfer into daily practice [22]. Therefore, for the first time, the present study investigates the impact of therapeutic hypothermia on ICU LOS in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The major determinants of short ICU LOS and ventilator time in patients after cardiac arrest were found to be either early death during ICU stay or rapid neurological recovery. While comparison of all patients (survivors and non-survivors) did not reveal a statistical difference regarding ICU LOS, subgroup analysis showed that short ICU LOS is related to an improved neurological outcome in the hypothermia group. In contrast, short ICU LOS in the control group was associated with a high rate of non-survivors. This striking result was confirmed with a multivariate regression model emphasizing the impact of therapeutic hypothermia on ICU LOS.

A high APACHE II score at admission was associated with a prolonged ICU stay in our study. It seems plausible that patients with higher severity of illness depend more on critical care facilities; however, it is known that the predictive value of the APACHE II score has various limitations after cardiac arrest [23, 24]. Our present results suggest that prognostic application of current scoring systems may be even more difficult in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Both ICU LOS and time of mechanical ventilation tended to be longer in non-survivors of the hypothermia group compared with non-survivors of the control group, which may reflect the difficulty of outcome prediction in patients routinely requiring sedation and muscle relaxation in the first days of intensive care. Beside clinical evaluation, biochemical markers (neuron-specific enolase, protein S100B) and electrophysiological studies (somatosensory-evoked potentials) are established tools for outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest [25, 26]. However, most of these parameters were studied in patients not undergoing hypothermia treatment. At present, little data on whether therapeutic hypothermia treatment may influence these biomarkers are available [27, 28]. Therefore, physicians should be careful in the prognostication of patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia [29].

It should be mentioned that our analysis has various limitations. First of all, results obtained with an observational study design using a historical control group generally require further validation by a randomized controlled trial. However, ethical concerns will most likely prevent a further randomized trial that withholds hypothermia treatment from a control group. Second, our local treatment standards may have affected ICU LOS and patient outcome. There is considerable variation regarding end-of-life decisions and care practices. Thus, the approach used by a specific ICU on deciding whether to withhold or withdraw critical care in patients after cardiac arrest may have an important impact on ICU LOS. This may help to explain data from a Canadian survey reporting that patients with a higher Glasgow Coma Scale score had a longer ICU stay [30].

Moreover, differences in ICU LOS may also be related to a different use and allocation of ICU capacities in general. Decision making potentially may be influenced by a variety of factors that are independent of the individual patient characteristics, such as the availability of ICU beds and/or of facilities of 'step-down' care. It is of interest to note, however, that the necessity of mechanical ventilation, which is a rather objective criterion for the necessity of ICU treatment, is reduced by hypothermia treatment. Since impaired neurological status has been identified as a predictor of extubation failure or weaning failure [31, 32], this finding may be associated with the more favorable neurological outcome in the hypothermia group.

Another issue with impact on ICU LOS and time on ventilator might be systemic inflammation after cardiac arrest. Both infectious and non-infectious systemic inflammations are a frequent problem in these patients [33, 34]. As demonstrated in the HACA (Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest) trial, there may even be a trend toward a higher rate of infections in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. However, we found no difference between the two study groups with respect to laboratory markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein/leukocyte count) and radiological findings of early-onset pneumonia. Therefore, early infection or pneumonia had no impact on different mechanical ventilator times between the groups.

In our analysis, we may have suffered from a selection bias because some baseline characteristics (bystander CPR and rate of ventricular fibrillation) tended to be more favorable in the hypothermia group although APACHE II score was lower in the control group. Finally, we cannot exclude the fact that the introduction of therapeutic hypothermia itself has focused the attention of the physicians in charge to a more sophisticated post-resuscitation care in general, which has been described [35]. However, similar promising results were also reported from a large hypothermia registry [36].

Conclusion

In summary, patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia showed both an impressive improvement of neurological outcome as well as an increased 1-year survival rate. Furthermore, therapeutic hypothermia did not prolong ICU stay or time of mechanical ventilation; rather, these parameters were reduced in survivors when therapeutic hypothermia was applied. Although we did not directly calculate the ICU treatment costs, we believe that this could be an additional argument for the application of therapeutic hypothermia in patients after cardiac arrest.

Key messages

  • The major determinants of short intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and ventilator time in patients after cardiac arrest were found to be either early death during ICU stay or rapid neurological recovery.

  • Therapeutic hypothermia did not prolong ICU stay or time of mechanical ventilation in patients after cardiac arrest compared with historical controls.

  • Both ICU stay and time of mechanical ventilation were reduced in survivors of cardiac arrest treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

  • Therapeutic hypothermia was associated with significantly improved neurological outcome and 1-year survival.

Abbreviations

APACHE II : 

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II

CI : 

confidence interval

CPC : 

cerebral performance category

CPR : 

cardiopulmonary resuscitation

ICU : 

intensive care unit

ILCOR : 

International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

IQR : 

interquartile range

LOS : 

length of stay

MICU : 

medical intensive care unit

ROSC : 

return of spontaneous circulation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Astrid Caemmerer for assistance and support throughout the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum

References

  1. Bulut S, Aengevaeren WR, Luijten HJ, Verheugt FW: Successful out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what is the optimal in-hospital treatment strategy? Resuscitation 2000, 47: 155-161. 10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00217-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group: Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002, 346: 549-556. 10.1056/NEJMoa012689View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K: Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002, 346: 557-563. 10.1056/NEJMoa003289View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nolan JP, Morley PT, Hoek TL, Hickey RW, Kloeck WG, Billi J, Böttiger BW, Morley PT, Nolan JP, Okada K, Reyes C, Shuster M, Steen PA, Weil MH, Wenzel V, Hickey RW, Carli P, Hoek TL, Atkins D, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation: Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: an advisory statement by the advanced life support task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation 2003, 108: 118-121. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079019.02601.90View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Merchant RM, Soar J, Skrifvars MB, Silfvast T, Edelson DP, Ahmad F, Huang KN, Khan M, Hoek TL, Becker LB, Abella BS: Therapeutic hypothermia utilization among physicians after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 1935-1940. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000220494.90290.92View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wolfrum S, Radke PW, Pischon T, Willich SN, Schunkert H, Kurowski V: Mild therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest – a nationwide survey on the implementation of the ILCOR guidelines in German intensive care units. Resuscitation 2007, 72: 207-213. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.06.033View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Storm C, Schefold JC, Nibbe L, Martens F, Krueger A, Oppert M, Joerres A, Hasper D: Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest – the implementation of the ILCOR guidelines in clinical routine is possible! Crit Care 2006, 10: 425. 10.1186/cc4772PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins TJ, Samworth PJ: Therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest: a review of the evidence. Nurs Crit Care 2008, 13: 144-151. 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2008.00267.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Varon J, Acosta P: Therapeutic hypothermia: past, present, and future. Chest 2008, 133: 1267-1274. 10.1378/chest.07-2190View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouch DC, Thompson JP, Damian MS: Post-cardiac arrest management: more than global cooling? Br J Anaesth 2008, 100: 591-594. 10.1093/bja/aen075View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Froehler MT, Geocadin RG: Hypothermia for neuroprotection after cardiac arrest: mechanisms, clinical trials and patient care. J Neurol Sci 2007, 261: 118-126. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.04.042View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Holzer M, Behringer W, Schörkhuber W, Zeiner A, Sterz F, Laggner AN, Frass M, Siostrozonek P, Ratheiser K, Kaff A: Mild hypothermia and outcome after CPR. Hypothermia for Cardiac Arrest (HACA) Study Group. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1997, 111: 55-58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zweifler RM, Voorhees ME, Mahmood MA, Alday DD: Induction and maintenance of mild hypothermia by surface cooling in non-intubated subjects. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2003, 12: 237-243. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2003.09.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Flint AC, Hemphill JC, Bonovich DC: Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: performance characteristics and safety of surface cooling with or without endovascular cooling. Neurocrit Care 2007, 7: 109-118. 10.1007/s12028-007-0068-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Merchant RM, Abella BS, Peberdy MA, Soar J, Ong ME, Schmidt GA, Becker LB, Hoek TL: Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: unintentional overcooling is common using ice packs and conventional cooling blankets. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: S490-S494. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000246016.28679.36View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim F, Olsufka M, Carlbom D, Deem S, Longstreth WT Jr, Hanrahan M, Maynard C, Copass MK, Cobb LA: Pilot study of rapid infusion of 2 L of 4 degrees C normal saline for induction of mild hypothermia in hospitalized, comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005, 112: 715-719. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.544528View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Uray T, Malzer R: Out-of-hospital surface cooling to induce mild hypothermia in human cardiac arrest: A feasibility trial. Resuscitation 2008, 77: 331-338. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.01.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jakobsson J, Nyquist O, Rehnqvist N, Norberg KA: Cost of a saved life following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated by specially trained ambulance personnel. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987, 31: 426-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975, 1: 480-484. 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bekkers SC, Eikemans BJ, Tieleman R, Braat SH, Dassen W, Partouns J, de Zwaan C, Crijns HJ, de Krom MC: Hypothermia for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: a single-center experience. Am J Emerg Med 2007, 25: 1078-1080. 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.06.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Oddo M, Schaller MD, Feihl F, Ribordy V, Liaudet L: From evidence to clinical practice: effective implementation of therapeutic hypothermia to improve patient outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 1865-1873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Soreide E, Sunde K: Therapeutic hypothermia after out-of hospital cardiac arrest: how to secure worldwide implementation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008, 21: 209-215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Niskanen M, Kari A, Nikki P, Iisalo E, Kaukinen L, Rauhala V, Saarela E, Halinen M: Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1991, 19: 1465-1473. 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolan JP, Laver SR, Welch CA, Harrison DA, Gupta V, Rowan K: Outcome following admission to UK intensive care units after cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database. Anaesthesia 2007, 62: 1207-1216. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05232.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Grubb NR, Simpson C, Sherwood RA, Abraha HD, Cobbe SM, O'Carroll RE, Deary I, Fox KA: Prediction of cognitive dysfunction after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using serum neuron-specific enolase and protein S-100. Heart 2007, 93: 1268-1273. 10.1136/hrt.2006.091314PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Carter BG, Butt W: Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury. Crit Care Med 2001, 29: 178-186. 10.1097/00003246-200101000-00036View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tiainen M, Roine RO, Pettila V, Takkunen O: Serum neuron-specific enolase and S-100B protein in cardiac arrest patients treated with hypothermia. Stroke 2003, 34: 2881-2886. 10.1161/01.STR.0000103320.90706.35View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sunde K, Dunlop O, Rostrup M, Sandberg M, Sjoholm H, Jacobsen D: Determination of prognosis after cardiac arrest may be more difficult after introduction of therapeutic hypothermia. Resuscitation 2006, 69: 29-32. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.12.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Geocadin RG, Eleff SM: Cardiac arrest resuscitation: neurologic prognostication and brain death. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008, 14: 261-268. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282fd68eaView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keenan SP, Dodek P, Martin C, Priestap F, Norena M, Wong H: Variation in length of intensive care unit stay after cardiac arrest: where you are is as important as who you are. Crit Care Med 2007, 35: 836-841. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000257323.46298.A3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Namen AM, Ely EW, Tatter SB, Case LD, Lucia MA, Smith A, Landry S, Wilson JA, Glazier SS, Branch CL, Kelly DL, Bowton DL, Haponik EF: Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 163: 658-664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Salam A, Tilluckdharry L, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA: Neurologic status, cough, secretions and extubation outcomes. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30: 1334-1339. 10.1007/s00134-004-2231-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai MS, Chiang WC, Lee CC, Hsieh CC, Ko PC, Hsu CY, Su CP, Chen SY, Chang WT, Yuan A, Ma MH, Chen SC, Chen WJ: Infections in the survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the first 7 days. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31: 621-626. 10.1007/s00134-005-2612-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Adrie C, Laurent I, Monchi M, Cariou A, Dhainaou JF, Spaulding C: Postresuscitation disease after cardiac arrest: a sepsis-like syndrome? Curr Opin Crit Care 2004, 10: 208-212. 10.1097/01.ccx.0000126090.06275.feView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sunde K, Pytte M, Jacobsen D, Mangschau A, Jensen LP, Smedsrud C, Draegni T, Steen PA: Implementation of a standardised treatment protocol for post resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007, 73: 29-39. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Arrich J: Clinical application of mild therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2007, 35: 1041-1047. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259383.48324.35View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Storm et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement