- Open Access
Timing of tracheostomy as a determinant of weaning success in critically ill patients: a retrospective study
© Hsu et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
- Received: 28 July 2004
- Accepted: 16 November 2004
- Published: 23 December 2004
Tracheostomy is frequently performed in critically ill patients for prolonged intubation. However, the optimal timing of tracheostomy, and its impact on weaning from mechanical ventilation and outcomes in critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation remain controversial.
The medical records of patients who underwent tracheostomy in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary medical centre from July 1998 to June 2001 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics, length of stay in the ICU, rates of post-tracheostomy pneumonia, weaning from mechanical ventilation and mortality rates were analyzed.
A total of 163 patients (93 men and 70 women) were included; their mean age was 70 years. Patients were classified into two groups: successful weaning (n = 78) and failure to wean (n = 85). Shorter intubation periods (P = 0.02), length of ICU stay (P = 0.001) and post-tracheostomy ICU stay (P = 0.005) were noted in patients in the successful weaning group. Patients who underwent tracheostomy more than 3 weeks after intubation had higher ICU mortality rates and rates of weaning failure. The length of intubation correlated with the length of ICU stay in the successful weaning group (r = 0.70; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that tracheostomy after 3 weeks of intubation, poor oxygenation before tracheostomy (arterial oxygen tension/fractional inspired oxygen ratio <250) and occurrence of nosocomial pneumonia after tracheostomy were independent predictors of weaning failure.
The study suggests that tracheostomy after 21 days of intubation is associated with a higher rate of failure to wean from mechanical ventilation, longer ICU stay and higher ICU mortality.
- critical illness
- mechanical ventilation
Tracheostomy is among the most frequently performed procedures in critically ill patients, being done in about 24% of patients in medical intensive care units (ICUs) . The most common indication for tracheostomy in the ICU is need for prolonged mechanical ventilation [2, 3]. Tracheostomy has several advantages over endotracheal intubation, including lower airway resistance, smaller dead space, less movement of the tube within the trachea, greater patient comfort and more efficient suction [4, 5]. Although recent studies have suggested that tracheostomy can be a safe procedure in the ICU [6, 7], tracheostomy has also been found to lead to serious complications, including tracheal stenosis, increased bacterial colonization and haemorrhage [8, 9]. Many critically ill patients' families have been hesitant in authorizing tracheostomy because of cosmetic issues and speech problems.
Because there are no definitive guidelines available, the timing of tracheostomy depends on clinical conditions, physician judgement and communication with families. The judgement of the attending physician can be influenced by the patients' likelihood of extubation, life expectancy and other clinical conditions, including haemodynamic status, oxygenation, consciousness level and ability to protect the airway. There is little consensus on the timing of tracheostomy. In the 1989 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Consensus Conference on Artificial Airways in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation , it was concluded that the appropriate duration of translaryngeal intubation could not be defined. It was suggested that if the anticipated need for mechanical ventilation is longer than 21 days then tracheostomy is preferable. For mechanical ventilation that is anticipated to last between 10 and 21 days, the decision was left to the physician, and daily assessment was recommended. Recent ACCP guidelines  suggest that tracheostomy should be considered after an initial period of stabilization on the ventilator, when it becomes apparent that the patient will require prolonged ventilator assistance.
Maziak and coworkers  reviewed five reports on the timing of tracheostomy and concluded that there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the timing of tracheostomy alters the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, there is still a lack of data on the relationship between the timing of tracheostomy and weaning from mechanical ventilation for patients in the medical ICU. Therefore, we investigated the timing of tracheostomy and other factors that might influence weaning from mechanical ventilation and outcomes of patients admitted to the medical ICU.
Over a period of 36 months (from July 1998 to June 2001), all adult patients admitted to the medical ICU of National Taiwan University Hospital – a 1500-bed tertiary medical centre that accommodates tracheostomy within the ICU – were considered for inclusion in the study. Patients were excluded if the tracheostomy was performed in an emergency setting because of difficulties with the airway or other causes. Tracheostomy was performed using standard surgical techniques at bedside in the ICU, and no patients underwent percutaneous tracheostomy. The timing of tracheostomy depended on the attending physician's decision. Indications to initiate an attempt to wean a patient from mechanical ventilation included stable haemodynamic status, improved oxygenation (arterial oxygen tension [PaO2]/fractional inspired oxygen [FiO2] ratio >150), controlled infection and lack of need for further intervention. The weaning process was begun with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support. Then, patients underwent continuous positive airway pressure with pressure support, or intermittent T-piece for a spontaneous breathing trial when clinical conditions improved. Successful weaning was defined as weaning from mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours. Patients were transferred to long-term care settings once tracheostomy and the weaning process were completed if there was no other active clinical disease.
The indications for intubation were defined as any major problem(s) that necessitated intubation. The underlying disease of the patients, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and malignant disease with lung metastasis, were ascertained through chart reviews. Medical records were analyzed for age, sex, underlying disease and cause of intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score , duration of mechanical ventilation, complications of tracheostomy, pneumonia after tracheostomy, length of ICU stay, and mortality in the ICU and hospital. APACHE II scores were calculated using clinical data, which were available from the first 24 hours of intensive care. Clinical data within 72 hours before tracheostomy, including PaO2/FiO2 ratio, peripheral white blood cell (WBC) counts, haemoglobin, creatinine and albumin, were also recorded and analyzed. Old age was defined as age above 65 years. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin below 10 g/dl, and leucocytosis was defined as a WBC count above 11,000/ μl before tracheostomy. Renal insufficiency was defined as creatinine above 1.5 mg/dl, and poor oxygenation as PaO2/FiO2 ratio below 250.
Complications of tracheostomy, including bleeding, air leakage, pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, cardiopulmonary arrest, dislodgement of the tube, obstruction, tracheal stenosis, granuloma, tracheo-oesophageal fistula and tracheomalacia, were recorded. Complications that occurred within 7 days after tracheostomy were defined as early complications; those occurring later were considered late complications. Severity of bleeding after tracheostomy was classified as follows: minor if there was only minimal blood clot over the wound or if new onset bloody sputum was noted on the next day of the tracheostomy; moderate if bleeding needed external compression and component therapy or surgical management; and massive if the bleeding resulted in obvious haemodynamic change. The clinical definition of post-tracheostomy pneumonia used was as follows : new and persistent radiographic opacity found after the tracheostomy had been removed and within 48 hours into the weaning period; positive sputum culture; and three of body temperature above 38°C, WBC count above 15,000/μl, increased airway secretions, or worsening gas exchange.
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (continuous variables) or as a percentage of the group from which they were derived (categorical variables). Only variables with complete data were analyzed in the study. Differences in the groups, including sex, underlying diseases and associated medical conditions, indications for intubation, occurrence of post-tracheostomy pneumonia, successful weaning and mortality, were analyzed using χ2 test. Other variables, including age, sex, APACHE II score, the length of ICU stay, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, peripheral WBC count, haemoglobin, albumin and weaning period, were analyzed by an independent t-test. The correlations between the intubation period and the length of ICU stay were analyzed using a Pearson bivariate correlation test. The correlations between successful weaning and potentially influential factors, including old age, sex, presence of comorbidities, indications for intubation, leucocytosis, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, renal insufficiency, poor oxygenation, post-tracheostomy pneumonia and timing of tracheostomy, were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method with a log rank test. Censoring was performed for those patients who died during mechanical ventilation. A Cox regression model was applied for multivariate analysis with variables that were significantly associated with successful weaning in the univariate analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Demographic and clinical characteristics
Total (n = 163)
Successful weaning (n = 78)
Failure to wean (n = 85)
70.3 ± 15.1
68.6 ± 15.4
71.8 ± 14.8
APACHE II score
20.0 ± 7.2
19.6 ± 7.1
21.3 ± 7.6
Congestive heart failure
Cancer metastatic to lung
The most common early complication of tracheostomy was bleeding (moderate bleeding in 11 [6.7%] and minor bleeding in 46 [28.2%]), followed by subcutaneous emphysema (3 [1.8%]; in two this occurred together with bleeding and in one it occurred together with air leakage) and obstruction (3 [1.8%]). The most common late complication was bleeding (4 [2.5%]), followed by air leakage (3 [1.8%]) and tracheal stenosis (2 [1.2%]). The incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the successful weaning and failure-to-wean groups (early complications: 38.5% versus 37.6%, P = 1.0; late complications: 6.4% versus 9.4%, P = 0.6). No patient died during the procedure operation or because of complications of tracheostomy.
Timing of tracheostomy and outcomes
Reasons for intubation
Reason for intubation
Total (n = 163)
Successful weaning (n = 78)
Failure to wean (n = 85)
Total (n = 163)
Successful weaning (n = 78)
Failure to wean (n = 85)
2.7 ± 0.5
2.7 ± 0.4
2.6 ± 0.5
44.2 ± 49.6
47.5 ± 63.2
41.2 ± 32.5
1.5 ± 1.7
1.4 ± 1.8
1.6 ± 1.6
10.5 ± 1.3
10.6 ± 1.3
10.4 ± 1.2
WBC count (cells/μl)
11993 ± 5474
11110 ± 4570
12803 ± 6104
Platelet (cell × 103/μl)
192.2 ± 113.7
217.9 ± 116.3
168.7 ± 106.4
261.5 ± 93.6
284.5 ± 85.5
240.7 ± 96.1
7.4 ± 0.1
7.4 ± 0.1
7.4 ± 0.1
40.9 ± 11.3
39.5 ± 7.5
42.2 ± 13.8
Outcomes after tracheostomy
Total (n = 163)
Successful weaning (n = 78)
Failure to wean (n = 85)
ICU mortality (n [%])
In-hospital mortality (n [%])
Intubation period (days)
18.5 ± 10.9
16.3 ± 10.5
20.4 ± 10.9
Overall ICU stay (days)
29.7 ± 15.8
25.4 ± 13.8
33.7 ± 16.4
Post-tracheostomy ICU stay (days)
11.9 ± 9.9
9.7 ± 7.6
14.0 ± 11.3
Post-tracheostomy MV period (days)
27.3 ± 40.7
10.5 ± 12.6
42.6 ± 50.4
The present study demonstrated that patients who underwent tracheostomy and failed to wean from mechanical ventilation had longer intubation periods before tracheostomy. Timing of tracheostomy was correlated with length of ICU stay in the successful weaning group.
The type of ICU may also have an impact on the timing of tracheostomy. In surgical ICUs most patients do not have chronic lung disease or severe lung injury. These patients usually undergo tracheostomy early if they underwent a major surgical procedure and failed to extubate within several days after the operation. Previous studies [15–18] conducted in surgical ICUs have shown that tracheostomy performed within 1 week after intubation may be beneficial in lowering rates of pneumonia, and in shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay. However, other studies reported a higher incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia [19, 20] and longer length of ICU stay  in association with tracheostomy. In a neurological ICU, tracheostomy is usually performed if there is a depressed level of consciousness and poor ability to protect the airway. A recent study  demonstrated that early tracheostomy in patients in a medical ICU shortened the length of hospital stay and lowered hospital costs. The present study demonstrated that late tracheostomy may predispose to failure to wean and ICU mortality, especially when the intubation period is longer than 3 weeks. We also found that the duration of intubation before tracheostomy was correlated with length of ICU stay in patients who weaned successfully.
There were no obvious differences in terms of age, sex, APACHE II score, or underlying disease between the successful weaning and failure-to-wean groups, except for more neurological disease in the successful weaning group. However, in the 3 days before tracheostomy, higher WBC count, lower platelet count and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio were noted in the failure-to-wean group. These observations suggest that leucocytosis, low platelet count and severity of respiratory failure before tracheostomy might have had a greater impact on outcome than initial presentation at ICU admission.
A longer intubation period was noted in those patients who failed to wean, indicating that, like the pre-tracheostomy conditions mentioned above, late tracheostomy may predispose to poor weaning outcome. A prolonged intubation period may impair the local barrier and bronchial hygiene, increasing the risk for bacterial colonization. Also, it may result in a higher rate of post-tracheostomy pneumonia – an association that was found in the failure-to-wean group. Ely and coworkers  demonstrated that prolonged intubation with mechanical ventilation was associated with increased hospital mortality and was independent of severity of illness. In the present study we found that prolonged intubation was associated with prolonged ICU stay. Delaying tracheostomy might not have been beneficial in these patients.
Reasons for intubation, poor pre-tracheostomy conditions, prolonged intubation and post-tracheostomy pneumonia were found to influence ventilator weaning in univariate analysis. However, in multivariate analysis we found that only late tracheostomy, pre-tracheostomy poor oxygenation and post-tracheostomy pneumonia during the weaning period were independent predictors of unsuccessful weaning. This finding suggests that timing of tracheostomy has an impact on ventilator weaning, as well as other clinical events. The 1989 ACCP Consensus Conference on Artificial Airways in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation  suggested that tracheostomy is preferable if the anticipated need for mechanical ventilation is for more than 21 days. Recent ACCP guidelines  encourage early tracheostomy after patient stabilization if the patient needs prolonged mechanical ventilation. Our data support the suggestion of the earlier ACCP guidelines  that, when tracheostomy is performed more than 3 weeks after intubation, rates of ICU mortality and failure to wean increase.
The incidence of complications in adults who have undergone tracheostomy varies from 6% to 51% [4, 24, 25]. In the present study, the early complication rate was 38% and the late complication rate was 8% during hospitalization. The major early complication was minor to moderate bleeding from surgical wounds, which did not cause obvious clinical deterioration. We found tracheostomy to be a relatively safe procedure for airway management in patients who needed prolonged mechanical ventilation.
There are some limitations to the study. This retrospective study lacks baseline pulmonary function data before tracheostomy, which might have influenced the duration of weaning. Poor patient condition on admission to the medical ICU might have influenced the decision to perform a tracheostomy late.
In this study we found that performance of tracheostomy more than 21 days after intubation was associated with prolonged weaning periods and low rates of successful weaning. It might also result in prolonged ICU stay. If one waits longer than 21 days, then it may be better to forego tracheostomy altogether.
We found that performance of tracheostomy more than 21 days after intubation was associated with prolonged weaning periods and low rates of weaning.
Late tracheostomy might also result in prolonged ICU stay; if one waits longer than 21 days, then it may be better to forego tracheostomy altogether.
- Esteban A, Anzueto A, Alia I, Gordo F, Apezteguia C, Palizas F, Cide D, Goldwaser R, Soto L, Bugedo G, et al.: How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 161: 1450-1458.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heffner JE, Miller KS, Sahn SA: Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Part 1: Indications, technique, management. Chest 1986, 90: 269-274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heffner JE: Medical indications for tracheotomy. Chest 1989, 96: 186-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Astrachan DI, Kirchner JC, Goodwin WJ Jr: Prolonged intubation vs. tracheotomy: complications, practical and psychological considerations. Laryngoscope 1988, 98: 1165-1169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diehl JL, El Atrous S, Touchard D, Lemaire F, Brochard L: Changes in the work of breathing induced by tracheotomy in ventilator-dependent patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159: 383-388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Upadhyay A, Maurer J, Turner J, Tiszenkel H, Rosengart T: Elective bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. J Am Coll Surg 1996, 183: 51-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kahveci SF, Goren S, Kutlay O, Ozcan B, Korfali G: Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy experience with 72 critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000, 17: 688-691. 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00756.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeitouni AG, Kost KM: Tracheostomy: a retrospective review of 281 cases. J Otolaryngol 1994, 23: 61-66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stock MC, Woodward CG, Shapiro BA, Cane RD, Lewis V, Pecaro B: Perioperative complications of elective tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1986, 14: 861-863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plummer AL, Gracey DR: Consensus conference on artificial airways in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 1989, 96: 178-180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacIntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW Jr, Epstein SK, Fink JB, Heffner JE, Hess D, Hubmayer RD, Scheinhorn DJ, American College of Chest Physicians; American Association for Respiratory Care; American College of Critical Care Medicine: Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 2001,120(Suppl):375S-395S. 10.1378/chest.120.6_suppl.375SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maziak DE, Meade MO, Todd TR: The timing of tracheostomy: a systematic review. Chest 1998, 114: 605-609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985, 13: 818-829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Torres A, Aznar R, Gatell JM, Jimenez P, Gonzalez J, Ferrer A, Celis R, Rodriguez-Roisin R: Incidence, risk, and prognostic factors of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990, 142: 523-528.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lesnik I, Rappaport W, Fulginiti J, Witzke D: The role of early tracheostomy in blunt, multiple organ trauma. Am Surg 1992, 58: 346-349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong PA, McCarthy MC, Peoples JB: Reduced use of resources by early tracheostomy in ventilator-dependent patients with blunt trauma. Surgery 1998, 124: 763-767. 10.1067/msy.1998.91224View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sugerman HJ, Wolfe L, Pasquale MD, Rogers FB, O'Malley KF, Knudson M, DiNardo L, Gordon M, Schaffer S: Multicenter, randomized, prospective trial of early tracheostomy. J Trauma 1997, 43: 741-747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez JL, Steinberg SM, Luchetti FA, Gibbons KJ, Taheri PA, Flint LM: Early tracheostomy for primary airway management in the surgical critical care setting. Surgery 1990, 108: 655-659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koh WY, Lew TW, Chin NM, Wong MF: Trachostomy in a neuro-intensive care setting: Indications and timing. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997, 25: 365-368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim EH, Tracy L, Hill C, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH: The occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a community hospital. Chest 2001, 120: 555-561. 10.1378/chest.120.2.555View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kollef MH, Ahrens TS, Shannon W: Clinical predictors and outcomes for patients requiring tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999, 27: 1714-1720. 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brook AD, Sherman G, Malen J, Kollef MH: Early versus late tracheostomy in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care 2000, 9: 352-359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ely EW, Baker AM, Evans GW, Haponik EF: The prognostic significance of passing a daily screen of weaning parameters. Intensive Care Med 1999, 25: 581-587. 10.1007/s001340050906View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yarington CT Jr, Frazer JP: Complications of tracheostomy. Arch Surg 1965, 91: 652-655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dane TE, King EG: A prospective study of complications after tracheostomy for assisted ventilation. Chest 1975, 67: 398-404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is cited.