Volume 8 Supplement 2

Anemia in Critical Care: Etiology, Treatment and Prevention

Open Access

Age of blood: does it make a difference?

Critical Care20048(Suppl 2):S24

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2405

Published: 14 June 2004

Abstract

During the past 20 years, the perceived value of blood transfusions has changed as it has become appreciated that transfusions are not without risk. Red blood cell transfusion has been associated with disease transmission and immunosuppression for some time. More recently, proinflammatory consequences of red blood cell transfusion have also been documented. Moreover, it has become increasingly evident that stored red blood cells undergo time-dependent metabolic, biochemical, and molecular changes. This 'storage lesion' may be responsible for many of the adverse effects of red blood cell transfusion. Clinically, the age of blood has been associated with multiple organ failure, postoperative pneumonia, and wound infection. The relationship between age of blood and clinical adverse effects needs further study.

Keywords

bloodblood transfusionmultiple organ failure

Introduction

The use of blood transfusion dates back to the mid-17th century. By the early 1900s blood transfusion emerged as a standard of clinical practice that was perceived as relatively free of risk. The value of blood transfusion was largely unchallenged until the early 1980s, when transfusion-related disease transmission, particularly HIV transmission, became a huge public health concern. Intense scrutiny and evaluation of transfusion practice and its risk/benefit balance followed.

Adverse effects of allogeneic blood transfusion

Clearly, the view of blood transfusion as risk free is no longer valid. Adverse consequences of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion include the following: hemolytic and non-hemolytic transfusion reactions, transmission of infectious agents, transfusion of contaminated RBCs, and transfusion-mediated immunomodulation.

The first indication that immune modulation secondary to allogeneic blood transfusion existed in humans was reported more than 25 years ago, when Opelz and colleagues [1] observed improved renal allograft survival with pretransplant allogeneic RBC transfusions. More recently, Opelz and coworkers [2] reported a clear improvement in renal allograft survival with allogeneic blood transfusion in addition to modern immunosuppressive therapy. Moreover, allogeneic blood transfusion-associated immunosuppression has been associated with a decreased recurrence rate of spontaneous abortion in affected women [3] and a reduced clinical relapse rate in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease [4]. It has also been argued that immunosuppressive effects of allogeneic blood transfusion might adversely affect the outcome of patients undergoing curative operation for malignancy [5]. In addition, several clinical studies demonstrated that allogeneic transfusion is an independent risk factor for postoperative bacterial infections [6, 7].

Although most emphasis has been placed on immune suppression following transfusion, it has become evident that proinflammatory effects may be important as well. Cytokines and other inflammatory mediators have been shown to accumulate during storage of blood products [8, 9]. Plasma from stored RBCs has been demonstrated to prime the oxidase system in neutrophils (even if leukoreduced), delay apoptosis, and activate endothelial cells [10, 11], setting the stage for neutrophil-mediated tissue destruction and organ failure. Indeed, several investigators have identified blood transfusion as an independent risk factor for postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF) [12, 13].

Red blood cell storage lesion

The advancement of transfusion medicine as a specialty has paralleled our ability to store blood ex vivo in its liquid state. As storage techniques have improved and extended the storage period up to 42 days, there has been a shift from focusing on maintaining RBC viability to including the quality of transfused RBCs as well.

The 'storage lesion' has been defined as the constellation of changes to the RBC that occur during storage, including metabolic, biochemical, and molecular changes, which eventually result in irreversible damage and ultimately limit the storage period [14]. Although the term traditionally has been restricted to corpuscular damage, recent evidence shows that a number of bioreactive substances accumulate in the medium during storage [8, 9, 11]. Selected changes characteristic of the storage lesion and their potential consequences are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Red blood cell storage lesion

Storage effects

Consequences

Decreased 2, 3-diphosphoglycerate

Increased oxygen affinity and decreased oxygen unloading by hemoglobin

ATP depletion

Erythrocyte shape changes

 

Increased osmotic fragility

 

Decreased deformability

Microvesiculation and loss of lipid membrane

Decreased erythrocyte viability

Lipid peroxidation

Cellular injury and death

Bioactive substance generation: histamine, cytokines, lipids

Febrile transfusion reactions

 

Neutrophil priming/endothelial activation

 

Cellular injury

 

Transfusion-related acute lung injury

 

Multiple organ failure (?)

We have been particularly interested in the relationship between blood transfusion and neutrophil priming. Silliman and coworkers [10] demonstrated that, during routine storage of whole blood and packed RBCs, agents were generated that significantly primed the NADPH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form) oxidase system. This effect was not significant until after 2 weeks of storage and was maximal by by the time all of the components were out of date. Those authors subsequently showed that this effect was largely due to accumulation of proinflammatory lipids, in particular lysophosphatidylcholines [15].

Evidence of clinical relevance

Despite the relative wealth of data regarding the changes related to storage of blood products, evidence of clinical significance has been sparse. As noted earlier, multiple studies now document adverse effects of allogeneic blood transfusion. The relationship between these adverse effects and the age of transfused blood, however, has not been adequately studied.

RBC transfusions are frequently advocated to increase oxygen delivery in critically ill patients. The immediate effectiveness of this therapy in increasing systemic oxygen uptake is questionable because storage depresses the ability of RBCs to deform as well as unload oxygen peripherally. Because 2, 3-diphosphoglycerate and deformability recover in vivo following transfusion, one would expect to see a delayed increase in systemic oxygen consumption after RBC transfusion. Marik and Sibbald [16], however, noted no improvement in systemic oxygen consumption for up to 6 hours after transfusion. Moreover, those authors noted an unexpected decrease in gastric intramucosal pH (measured by gastric tonometry) following transfusion with blood stored for longer than 15 days. They suggested that transfusion of old, poorly deformable RBCs leads to microcapillary sludging and obstruction, resulting in gut ischemia.

In light of the potential for stored RBC transfusion to adversely affect oxygen delivery and uptake, Purdy and colleagues [17] studied the relationship between the age of transfused blood and survival in critically ill septic patients. The authors retrospectively studied 31 patients admitted to their intensive care unit with severe sepsis. The number of units of packed RBCs transfused and the age of each unit was determined using blood bank records. There was no difference between survivors (n = 12) and nonsurvivors (n = 19) in age, sex, intensive care unit length of stay, incidence of septic shock, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, or total number of packed RBCs transfused. Nonsurvivors, however, were transfused with significantly older RBCs (median 24 days versus 21 days in survivors; P < 0.0001). Survivors were transfused with a greater proportion of RBCs that were less than 10 days old (85%), whereas nonsurvivors received a greater proportion of RBCs that were greater than 20 days old (76%).

Vamvakas and Carven [18] investigated the association between the duration of storage of transfused RBCs and postoperative infection following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. They observed that the mean duration of storage of all transfused RBCs was a significant predictor of postoperative pneumonia and wound infection. The risk for pneumonia increased by 1% per day of mean RBC storage time. Age of transfused RBCs remained a significant predictor of postoperative infection after controlling for other known risk factors.

Blood transfusion has consistently been shown to be a major risk factor for postinjury MOF. Initially, transfusion requirement was thought to be a surrogate for injury severity, but multiple studies have demonstrated it to be a robust and independent predictor of postinjury MOF [12, 13].

We previously demonstrated that old, but not outdated, packed RBC plasma primes neutrophils for superoxide production [15]. Furthermore, old blood plasma activates endothelial cells in a dose- and age-dependent fashion [11]. The concordant activation of endothelial cells and priming followed by activation of neutrophils is crucial to the development of postinjury MOF.

To investigate the clinical relevance of these laboratory data, we performed a multivariate analysis of trauma patients who received transfusions to examine the effects of the age of stored blood on the development of postinjury MOF [19]. We observed that patients who developed MOF received significantly older packed RBC units and, furthermore, that the age of the units was an independent predictor of MOF.

Conclusion

Current evidence shows that metabolic, biomechanical, and molecular changes occur during the storage of blood products. Data are accumulating that these changes may lead to harmful consequences in the recipient. Further studies are necessary to clarify this relationship. Changes in blood banking practice (i.e. leukocyte reduction), clinical practice (i.e. lower transfusion 'trigger', recombinant erythropoietin), and continued development of blood substitutes may facilitate avoidance of the adverse effects of allogeneic blood transfusion.

Abbreviations

MOF: 

MOF = multiple organ failure

RBC: 

RBC = red blood cell.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Chief, Surgical Intensive Care, St. Anthony Central Hospital

References

  1. Opelz G, Sengar DP, Mickey MR, Terasaki PI: Effect of blood transfusions on subsequent kidney transplants. Transplant Proc 1973, 5: 253-259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Opelz G, Vanrenterghem Y, Kirste G, Gray DW, Horsburgh T, Lachance JG, Largiader F, Lange H, Vujaklija-Stipanovic K, Alvarez-Grande J, Schott W, Hoyer J, Schnuelle P, Descoeudres C, Ruder H, Wujciak T, Schwarz V: Prospective evaluation of pretransplant blood transfusions in cadaver kidney recipients. Transplantation 1997, 63: 964-967. 10.1097/00007890-199704150-00010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Unander AM: The role of immunization treatment in preventing recurrent abortion. Transfus Med Rev 1992, 6: 1-16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Peters WR, Fry RD, Fleshman JW, Kodner IJ: Multiple blood transfusions reduce the recurrence rate of Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1989, 32: 749-753.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vamvakas E, Moore SB: Perioperative blood transfusion and colorectal cancer recurrence: a qualitative statistical overview and meta-analysis. Transfusion 1993, 33: 754-765. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33994025027.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jensen LS, Andersen AJ, Christiansen PM, Hokland P, Juhl CO, Madsen G, Mortensen J, Moller-Nielsen C, Hanberg-Sorensen F, Hokland M: Postoperative infection and natural killer cell function following blood transfusion in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1992, 79: 513-516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Heiss MM, Mempel W, Jauch K-W, Delanoff C, Mayer G, Mempel M, Eissner H-J, Schildberg F-W: Beneficial effect of autologous blood transfusion on infectious complications after colorectal cancer surgery. Lancet 1993, 342: 1328-1333. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92247-QView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kristiansson M, Soop M, Saraste L, Sundqvist KG: Cytokines in stored red blood cell concentrates: promoters of systemic inflammation and simulators of acute transfusion reactions? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996, 40: 496-501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Stack G, Baril L, Napychank P, Snyder EL: Cytokine generation in stored, white cell-reduced, and bacterially contaminated units of red cells. Transfusion 1995, 35: 199-203. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35395184274.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Silliman CC, Thurman GW, Ambruso DR: Stored blood components contain agents that prime the neutrophil NADPH oxidase through the platelet-activating-factor receptor. Vox Sang 1992, 63: 133-136.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Silliman CC, DJ Elzi, AA Hiester: Plasma from stored platelets and red cells activate human pulmonary endothelial cells [abstract]. Transfusion 1998, (Suppl):96S.Google Scholar
  12. Tran DD, Cuesta MA, van Leeuwen PA, Nauta JJ, Wesdorp RI: Risk factors for multiple organ system failure and death in critically injured patients. Surgery 1993, 114: 21-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore FA, Moore EE, Sauaia A: Blood transfusion. An independent risk factor for postinjury multiple organ failure. Arch Surg 1997, 132: 620-624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chin-Yee I, Arya N, d'Almeida MS: The red cell storage lesion and its implication for transfusion. Transfus Sci 1997, 18: 447-458. 10.1016/S0955-3886(97)00043-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Silliman CC, Clay KL, Thurman GW, Johnson CA, Ambruso DR: Partial characterization of lipids that develop during the routine storage of blood and prime the neutrophil NADPH oxidase. J Lab Clin Med 1994, 124: 684-694.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Marik PE, Sibbald WJ: Effect of stored-blood transfusion on oxygen delivery in patients with sepsis. JAMA 1993, 269: 3024-3029. 10.1001/jama.269.23.3024View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Purdy FR, Tweeddale MG, Merrick PM: Association of mortality with age of blood transfused in septic ICU patients. Can J Anaesth 1997, 44: 1256-1261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vamvakas EC, Carven JH: Transfusion and postoperative pneumonia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: effect of the length of storage of transfused red cells. Transfusion 1999, 39: 701-710. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39070701.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zallen G, Offner PJ, Moore EE, Blackwell J, Ciesla DJ, Gabriel J, Denny C, Silliman CC: Age of transfused blood is an independent risk factor for postinjury multiple organ failure. Am J Surg 1999, 178: 570-572. 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00239-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2004