Skip to content

Advertisement

Critical Care

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Serum activin A and B levels predict outcome in patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective cohort study

  • David Morritz de Kretser1, 2Email author,
  • Jonathan Guy Bensley2,
  • Ville Pettilä3,
  • Rita Linko3,
  • Mark Peter Hedger1,
  • Susan Hayward1,
  • Carolyn Anne Allan4,
  • Robert Ian McLachlan4,
  • Helen Ludlow5 and
  • David James Phillips1
Contributed equally
Critical Care201317:R263

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13093

Received: 3 June 2013

Accepted: 30 September 2013

Published: 31 October 2013

Abstract

Introduction

30 day mortality in patients with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) is approximately 30%, defined as patients requiring ventilator support for more than 6 hours. Novel biomarkers are needed to predict patient outcomes and to guide potential future therapies. The activins A and B, members of the Transforming Growth Factor β family of proteins, and their binding protein, follistatin, have recently been shown to be important regulators of inflammation and fibrosis but no substantial data are available concerning their roles in ARF.

Our objectives were to evaluate whether the serum levels of activin A, B and follistatin are elevated in 518 patients with ARF from the FINNALI study compared the concentrations in 138 normal subjects that form a reference range.

Methods

Specific assays for activin A, B and follistatin were used and the results analyzed according to diagnostic groups as well as according to standard measures in intensive care. Multivariable logistic regression was used to create a model to predict death at 90 days and 12 months from the onset of the ARF.

Results

Serum activin A and B were significantly elevated in most patients and in most of the diagnostic groups. Patients who had activin A and/or B concentrations above the reference maximum were significantly more likely to die in the 12 months following admission [either activin A or B above reference maximum: Positive Likelihood Ratio [LR+] 1.65 [95% CI 1.28-2.12, P = 0.00013]; both activin A and B above reference maximum: LR + 2.78 [95% CI 1.96-3.95, P < 0.00001]. The predictive model at 12 months had an overall accuracy of 80.2% [95% CI 76.6-83.3%].

Conclusions

The measurement of activin A and B levels in these patients with ARF would have assisted in predicting those at greatest risk of death. Given the existing data from animal studies linking high activin A levels to significant inflammatory challenges, the results from this study suggest that approaches to modulate activin A and B bioactivity should be explored as potential therapeutic agents.

Introduction

Managing acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the ICU is a major challenge [15]. Mortality in ARF, defined as requiring the need for ventilation for more than 6 hours, is approximately 30% at 30 days after ARF onset [3, 68], and despite many advances in care, improved methods are required to define those at greatest risk and to predict outcomes. Identifying novel biomarkers in ARF may lead to potential new therapies and enable better prediction of short and long term outcomes.

Activin A, a dimer of βA subunits, is a member of the transforming growth factor-β [TGFβ] superfamily, and was isolated originally for its capacity to stimulate follicle-stimulating hormone secretion by the pituitary gland. The amino acid sequence of the βA subunit is 100% conserved from the mouse to the human [9]. In experimental animal models in sheep and mice, it was subsequently shown to be a major stimulator of the inflammatory cascade initiated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [10, 11] and drives inflammation and fibrosis in various pathologies [9]. Another member of this family is activin B, a dimer of βB subunits, with 70% amino acid sequence homology to βA [9]. These proteins are produced in multiple organs and tissues [9].

Many factors regulate activin A bioactivity but follistatin is regarded as the major regulator, binding activin A virtually irreversibly and targeting the complex to a lysosomal degradation pathway [12, 13]. Activin A stimulates follistatin production, thereby modulating its own biological actions [9, 11] and a high activin A to follistatin ratio favors pro-inflammatory and fibrotic processes that are decreased by follistatin [14]. Administration of follistatin to mice before they were given LPS, resulted in a markedly lower TNFα response and altered the magnitude and temporal secretory pattern of IL1β and IL6 [15]. Further, follistatin administration prior to a lethal LPS injection was found to halve the mortality in mice [15].

A recent study used the intra-tracheal administration of an adenoviral associated vector expressing activin A in mice and showed that it induced a profound inflammatory response resulting in a cytokine storm and the transformation of normal lungs to an emphysematous phenotype in 3 to 4 weeks in the surviving mice [16].

Activin B, a closely related member of the TGFβ-activin protein subfamily, binds to the same receptor and is regarded as a weak activin A agonist, but there are very limited data concerning its actions in inflammation [9]. Its bioactivity can also be blocked by follistatin.

There are only limited data about the role of activins A and B in humans. A small study conducted in critically ill patients with septicemia suggested that markedly elevated serum activin A levels were associated with an increased risk of death [17]. In part, the absence of well-characterized assays for activins A and B and follistatin, and normal-range values obtained from a substantial number of volunteers carefully selected to exclude illnesses, particularly those with an inflammatory component, has hindered the acquisition of human data. Such well-defined normal ranges are critical to using serum activin A, B and follistatin as sensitive markers of inflammation. Previously defined normal ranges for activin A are inadequate due to limited numbers of normal subjects [18, 19].

This study establishes normal reference ranges for serum activin A and B and follistatin levels, and reports their levels in a large cohort of critically ill patients with ARF in the FINNALI study [3]. This study also establishes that serum activin A and B levels may assist in predicting survival outcomes of patients with ARF and provides a rationale to explore therapeutic avenues to modulate activin A and B.

Materials and methods

Ethics

The Board of the Finnish Quality Consortium (Intensium Ltd, Kuopio, Finland) and the Ethics Committees of each participating hospital approved the study design and use of the quality database for the purposes of the FINNALI study [3]. Due to the established nature of the ICU care provided in each ICU, the ethics committees waived the requirement for informed consent for data registration. The normal-range study was approved by the Southern Health Human Ethics Committee, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Samples from the FINNALI Study

From the FINNALI study of 958 patients with ARF treated by any ventilator support (invasive or non-invasive) for more than 6 hours and sequentially admitted to the ICU [3], 518 patients were selected solely on the basis of available blood samples (Figure 1). Their clinical management followed standard practice in the 12 participating ICUs. Blood samples were taken within 6 hours of commencing ventilation on day (D) zero (D0) (n = 487) and on D2 (n = 495), D7 (n = 323) and D21 (n = 62). Of 518 patients, only 47 had all four samples drawn. This analysis, unless otherwise noted, utilized the D0, D2 and D7 samples.
Figure 1

Patient selection flowchart. The initial selection step was the presence of an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (Apache) III diagnostic group and a sample available for analysis. Activin B samples below the limit of detection were given a nominal value to enable further analysis. Patients with non-specific etiologies were removed to enable examination of specific etiologies in this study.

Acute lung injury (ALI) or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) was diagnosed using the American-European Consensus Conference criteria [20]. Mortality was calculated from the beginning of the ARF. Of the 518 patients included in this study, 17 patients (3.3% of patients) had ARDS and 27 patients (5.2% of patients) had ALI at the beginning of ARF. The remainder, 474 patients, did not have ALI or ARDS at the beginning of ARF.

Patient data

Patient data were grouped by APACHE III diagnostic group [3]. Diagnostic groups are outlined in Table 1, and patient selection is detailed in Figure 1. The presence of chronic morbidities and risk factors preceding ARF, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II [21] minus oxygen points, day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [22] minus respiration points and the APACHE III score [23] were recorded. Outcome measures were mortality at 90 days and 12 months.
Table 1

Diagnostic categories of patients

Group

Diagnosis

Number of patients

 

Postoperative patients

 

1

 Cardiovascular

118

2

 Gastrointestinal

57

 

 Non-operative patients

 

3

 Cardiovascular

74

4

 Sepsis

26

5

 Gastro-intestinal/hematologic

24

6

 Metabolic

22

7

 Neurologic

56

8

 Respiratory

84

9

 Trauma

37

 

 Postoperative miscellaneous

 

10

 Respiratory/gynecology/renal/orthopedic

20

Patients grouped on the basis of their diagnostic categories as defined according to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE III) diagnostic groups (3).

Normal range study

Healthy adult male and female patients (n = 138) in the following age groups were recruited: 18 to 50 years (n = 56), 51 to 65 years (n = 52) and over 66 years (n = 30). Eligibility required body mass index (BMI) of <30, no major hospitalization within the last 3 years, no current acute illness or injury, no chronic inflammatory or neoplastic disease and no medication for significant clinical disease.

Following interview by the nurse coordinator, volunteers were formally consented by the study coordinator (DJP) and completed a form outlining any pertinent medical details. The following data were stored and used for statistical analyses: sex, age, ethnicity, weight, height, BMI, hip and waist circumference, details of hospitalizations, allergies, tobacco and alcohol usage (approximate number of standard alcoholic drinks (10 g alcohol or equivalent] per week), details of any medications and, if taking cholesterol-lowering medication, they were excluded from the study. Details of exercise (hours per week of exercise beyond normal lifestyle activity), symptoms potentially indicative of health problems (either past or present) were recorded including the date of last menstrual period (for premenopausal women). A sample of 120 mL of blood was taken from each volunteer, allowed to clot and the serum from each sample was aliquoted into smaller individual volumes and stored at -20°C to enable normal ranges to be determined for new assays.

Immunoassays

Total serum activin A was measured by a two-site ELISA [24] with a sensitivity of 7.7 pg/mL and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 5.7% and 7.7%, respectively. Total serum activin B was measured by ELISA as previously described [25] with no cross-reactivity with inhibin B or activin A. The assay sensitivity is 0.019 ng/mL and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation range between 2.7 to 6.2%, and 5.5 to 11.7%, respectively. Total follistatin was measured by radioimmunoassay as previously published [26] with a sensitivity of 1.44 ng/mL and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 5.8% and 7.1%, respectively.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 21 (IBM, New York, NY USA), SPSS Modeler 14.2 (IBM), SAS 9.3 (SAS, New York, NY USA) and GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad, La Jolla, Ca USA) were used to analyze data. Analyses used were the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (all multiple comparison analyses), Mann-Whitney U-Test (normal range comparisons) and the Chi-squared test (for age survival analysis). The predictive model was created using a binary logistic regression. Validation was performed using bootstrapping [27, 28]. Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, area under curve (AUC), positive likelihood ratio (LR) with 95% CIs, accuracy with 95% CIs, net reclassification index (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI) were calculated [29]. Survival evaluation used a log-rank test. Data are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and 95% CI, with a P-value less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Exact statistics are reported.

For the purposes of the predictive model, although substantially more accurate models were possible, they were unlikely to be generalizable, contained too many terms or would be difficult to perform at multiple time points. The threshold was set at 0.5, as we would regard a false positive and a false negative as equally bad outcomes.

Results

Normal range study

Activin A

Serum Activin A concentrations were 0.11 ± 0.41 ng/mL (range 0.036 to 0.283 ng/mL) and significantly increased with age, regardless of gender (r2 = 0.25, P <0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed a significant contribution of ethnicity (P = 0.011). Although potential participants were excluded if they were taking cholesterol-lowering medications, a proportion of participants were taking other medications. There were no significant effects of weight, hip circumference, alcohol consumption, smoking, time since hospitalization, exercise, allergies, or days since last menstruation. There were minor correlations with height (r2 = 0.031, P = 0.039), BMI (r2 = 0.028, P = 0.048) and waist circumference (r2 = 0.03, P = 0.042; Additional file 1: Figure E1). Activin A concentrations for each age group of 18 to 50 years, 51 to 65 years and 66+ years are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2.
Table 2

Normal ranges for serum activin A, B and follistatin

Analyte

Sex

Age (years)

Number

Concentration (ng/mL)

95% CI

Activin A

M/F

18 to 50

56

0.087 ± 0.004

0.080, 0.095

51 to 65

52

0.110 ± 0.005

0.099, 0.120

66+

30

0.150 ± 0.009

0.130, 0.170

Activin B

F

18 to 50

29

0.085 ± 0.005

0.074, 0.096

51 to 65

31

0.062 ± 0.005

0.051, 0.073

66+

20

0.071 ± 0.005

0.060, 0.082

Activin B

M

18 to 50

27

0.061 ± 0.004

0.053, 0.069

51 to 65

21

0.064 ± 0.005

0.053, 0.074

66+

10

0.086 ± 0.008

0.069, 0.100

Follistatin

M/F

18 to 50

56

11.67 ± 0.63

10.40, 12.94

51 to 65

52

12.61 ± 0.58

11.44, 13.78

66+

30

14.36 ± 0.71

12.90, 15.82

Reference ranges for activin A, activin B and follistatin, presented as mean ± standard error of the mean concentrations and 95% CI M, male; F, female.

Figure 2

Reference ranges from normal subjects, depicted as (A) activin A (ng/mL), (B) activin B (ng/mL), (C) follistatin (ng/mL), (D) activin A to activin B ratio, (E) activin A to follistatin ratio, and (F) activin B to follistatin ratio. In each panel, n = number of subjects. SEM, standard error of the mean; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; 5-95%, 5 to 95% values.

Activin B

Serum activin B concentrations were 0.070 ± 0.002 ng/mL (range 0.020 to 0.156 ng/mL). There were no significant differences with ethnicity and hypertensive medications. Age and sex were significantly correlated with activin B levels (P = 0.002). In female patients, activin B concentrations decreased with age, whereas in male patients they increased with age. Data for male and female patients appear separately in Table 2, and additional data are shown in Figure 2. These data have been published previously as part of the validation of the activin B assay [25] but are included in this paper to assist the reader in evaluating the use of this parameter in the management of patients with ARF.

Follistatin

Serum follistatin concentrations were 12.61 ± 0.38 ng/mL (range 3.67 to 25.42 ng/mL). There were no significant correlations with sex, ethnicity, waist or hip circumference, or BMI. Serum follistatin levels correlated with the number of days since the last menstrual period (r2 = 0.29, P = 0.004). Follistatin concentrations were positively correlated with age (P = 0.004). Data for each age range are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2.

Association of activins A and B, and follistatin, and survival at 12 months

This study used samples from a subset of patients from the FINNALI study [3]. The subset of patients included in this study were significantly less likely to die, stayed about a day longer in ICU and were less likely to be an emergency admission compared to the original FINNALI study (Additional file 1: Table E1).

Activin A levels

Sample D0 (within 6 hours from the commencement of ventilation) activin A levels did not differ between male and female patients and were markedly elevated (P <0.0001) above the normal range in all diagnostic groups (Figure 3, Additional file 1: Table E6) other than in the non-operative/postoperative trauma (group 9) and the postoperative respiratory, gynecology, renal and orthopedic groups (group 10).
Figure 3

Activin A/B and follistatin concentrations in ARF patients at day zero (D0) or day 2 (D2), compared with reference group levels (reference data). Each patient group was sorted by diagnosis (DG Group). Differing letters (a or b) denote a significant difference from the reference data. (NO) non-operative and (PO) Post-operative.

Serum activin A levels measured at D0 in patients who died at 90 days and 12 months were also markedly elevated above normal (P <0.0001). There were no significant differences between patients who survived and those who had died at those time points (Additional file 1: Table E1). In contrast, at the D2 time point (two days after the commencement of ventilation) serum activin A levels were significantly different between those who were alive and those who died at 90 days (P = 0.008) and 12 months (P = 0.0003; Additional file 1: Table E2). However, at the D7 sample time point, there were no differences. The rate of change between samples D0, D2 and D7 did not differ between those who lived and those who had died.

Activin B levels

In sample D0 serum activin B concentrations did not differ significantly between the sexes and were markedly elevated above the normal range in groups 1 to 6 and group 8 (groups 1 to 5, and 8, P <0.0001; group 6, P = 0.025) but were not significantly elevated in non-operative/postoperative neurologic (group 7), non-operative/postoperative trauma (Group 9), and the postoperative respiratory, gynecology, renal and orthopedic group (group 10, Figure 3 and Additional file 1: Table E6). In D0 samples, activin B levels were elevated (P <0.0001) above reference levels, but did not differ between those who survived and who had died at 90 days, or at 12 months (Additional file 1: Table E2). For both the D2 and D7 samples, serum activin B levels were significantly higher in those who died at 90 days and 12 months compared with those surviving at those times (Additional file 1: Table E2).

Follistatin levels

In the D0 sample, follistatin levels did not differ between the sexes and were elevated significantly above the normal range in groups 1 (P <0.0001), 3 (P <0.0001), 4 (P = 0.024), and 5 (P = 0.008) (Figure 3 and Additional file 1: Table E6). Using sample D0, patients had significantly (P = 0.0004) higher follistatin levels compared to the normal range, but there were no differences between those who were dead or alive at 90 days, or at 12 months (Additional file 1: Table E2). In the D2 samples, serum follistatin levels were higher than the reference subjects in patients dying at 90 days (P = 0.0007) and 12 months (P = 0.0018). Among those surviving to 90 days and 12 months, serum follistatin levels were lower than the normal range cohort (P = 0.008 and P = 0.033, respectively) for the D7 time point only. Serum follistatin levels in samples D2 and D7 samples were higher in those who had died at 90 days and at 12 months compared with those who lived, except for death at 12 months in the D2 sample (Additional file 1: Table E2).

ALI/ARDS

We also evaluated the effect of having ALI or ARDS on the levels of activins and follistatin. Of the 518 patients included in this study, we had data on ALI/ARDS for 495 patients. Of those 495 patients, 27 had ALI and 17 had ARDS. Patients with ALI did have statistically significantly higher levels of serum activin A at time points D2 (P = 0.04) and D7 (P = 0.01), but not at D0, when compared to patients without ALI. There were no differences in activin B or follistatin levels for patients with ALI compared with patients without ALI. When comparing patients with ALI who were alive and those who died at 90 days and 12 months, no differences in serum activins and follistatin levels were found at any time point.

Comparing ARDS patients with patients without ARDS, no differences were detected in serum activins or follistatin at any time point examined. Comparing ARDS patients who lived and died at 90 days and 12 months, no differences in serum activins and follistatin levels were found at any time point.

Survival

Gender did not affect survival at any time point. Age significantly increased the probability of death at 90 days and 12 months, using logistic regression (90 days (odds ratio (OR) per year 1.034, 95% CI 1.019, 1.049; P <0.00001), 12 months (OR per year 1.034, 95% CI 1.021, 1.048; P <0.00001). When evaluating survival using three groups, patients aged 16 to 50, 51 to 65 and 65+ years, patients who were over 65 years of age had 2.6 times greater risk of death at 12 months compared with patients who were 16 to 50 years of age (P = 0.0002), and patients aged 65+ had 1.87 times greater risk of death than those aged 51 to 65 years old (P = 0.0067), but there was no difference between those aged 16 to 50 and those aged 51 to 65 years ( P = 0.11). At 90 days, patients who were aged over 65 years had 3.1 times greater risk of death compared to patients aged 16 to 50 years (P <0.0001), patients aged 65+ had 1.9 times greater risk of death than those aged 51 to 65 years old (P = 0.0043), there was no effect between those aged 16 to 50 and those aged 51 to 65 years ( P = 0.26).

Predictive model

In order to formulate a scoring system that would facilitate the use of measures of the activins and follistatin by clinicians, we assessed a variety of models to determine their value in predicting patient outcome. We utilized MDLP (minimal description length principle) optimal scaling, maximum, mean and upper/lower 95% CI of the normal range to determine if activin A/B and follistatin levels would provide useful adjuncts to existing scoring systems in predicting survival.

For D0 samples, concentrations above the reference maximum, or any other metric for activin A, activin B and follistatin, were not useful in predicting outcome at 90 days or at 12 months. For D2 Samples, activin A and B offered good performance in predicting outcome at 90 days and 12 months, using the reference maximum as the cutoff point (Additional file 1: Table E3). Follistatin did not offer useful predictions using any metric. Although D7 samples offered good predictive value, we elected not to use them for modeling. A sample drawn at 7 days after the commencement of ventilation is not a practical time point for clinical use. Further, the use of multiple activins/follistatin measurements at multiple time points was not considered practical.

Based on these results, we used sample D2 for predicting ICU survival. We therefore used a constructed variable for activin A and B at time-point D2 with a three-option design, to evaluate specifically: when neither activin A or B were above the reference maximum; when either activin A or B were above the reference maximum, or when both activin A and B were above the reference maximum. This approach gave a good separation for survival curves, and was a good starting point for modeling (Figure 4). These constructed variables were robust using the AUC, positive LR, relative risk and observed risk measures (Additional file 1: Table E4).
Figure 4

Patient survival curves of up to 12 months according to activins A/B in the day 2 (D2) sample. Solid line: when neither activin A or activin B were over the reference maximum; dashed line: when either activin A or activin B were over the reference maximum (dashed line); dotted line: when both activin A and activin B were over the reference maximum. Statistically, comparing neither activin A or B over the reference maximum to either activin A or B over the reference maximum yielded P = 0.0003; comparing neither activin A or B over the reference maximum to both activin A or B over the reference maximum yielded P <0.0001, and comparing either activin A or B over the reference maximum to both activin A and B over over the reference maximum yielded P = 0.009.

We then developed a scoring system, the follistatin, and activin A and B (FAB) score to predict the risk of death over the year after the initiation of ventilation. Details of the components incorporated into the score are given in the legend to Table 3; as well as measures of activins A, and B, the score utilizes several standard criteria routinely collected in the management of critically ill patients in the ICU. This is a balanced score, calibrated at both 90 days (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Chi-square = 9.502, P = 0.302) and 12 months (Chi- square = 12.222, P = 0.142).
Table 3

Components of the FAB prediction model

Variable

Type

 

Equation factor

Age

Numeric (Years)

 

0.041

Activin A, Activin B measurement at 2 days after commencement of ventilation – FAB Constructed variable

Choice

Activin A <0.283 ng/mL

0

Activin B <0.156 ng/mL

 

Activin A >0.283 ng/mL OR

0.934

Activin B >0.156 ng/mL

 

Activin A >0.283 ng/mL AND

1.197

Activin B >0.156 ng/mL

Chronic restrictive pulmonary disease

Yes/No

Yes

0.900

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Yes/No

Yes

0.577

Diagnostic group

Choice

Postoperative cardiovascular

0

  

Postoperative gastrointestinal

1.505

  

Non-operative cardiovascular

2.135

  

Non-operative sepsis

0.959

  

Non-operative Gastrointestinal/hematological

1.111

  

Non-operative metabolic

1.796

  

Non-operative neurologic

2.599

  

Non-operative respiratory

1.824

  

Non-operative trauma

0.720

  

Miscellaneous postoperative (respiratory, gynecologic, renal, orthopedic)

1.265

SOFA maximal score

Numeric

 

0.220

Constant

  

-7.765

FAB, follistatin, and activin A and B; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Formula for FAB score: (Age*0.041) + (Activin A/B component) + (Presence of xhronic restrictive pulmonary disease) + (Presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) + (Diagnostic group) + (Maximal SOFA score*0.220) + Constant. This produces a range with a mean of zero. To obtain the risk profile, each value was entered into the following equation: Probability Estimate = ln Result 1 + ln Result .

This produced a range of values from 0.0 to 1.0, a score approaching 1.0 having the greatest risk of death and approaching 0.0 having the least risk of death. For risk stratification purposes, it was then divided into 10 bins, each 0.1 wide with the upper endpoint of each bin included in the lower bin.

The equation factor listed is the value that should be inserted into the equation.

Comparing the FAB score without the activin A/B component with the complete FAB score demonstrated that the addition of the activin A/B component substantially improved the predictive value of the model for outcomes at both 90 days and 12 months.

For 90 days, the addition of the activin A/B component yielded a categorical NRI of 0.0058 (95% CI -0.0565, 0.0682; P = 0.854), a category-free NRI of 0.4444 (95% CI 0.2375, 0.6513; P = 0.00001), and an IDI of 0.0268 (95% CI 0.008, 0.0457; P = 0.0053). For 12 months, the addition of the activin A/B component yielded a categorical NRI of 0.0414 (95% CI: -0.0205, 0.1032; P = 0.190), a category-free NRI of 0.4942 (95% CI 0.2997, 0.6887; P <0.000001) and an IDI of 0.0322 (95% CI 0.015, 0.0495; P = 0.00025).

To better stratify risk, the FAB score for purposes of this analysis was divided from 0.0 to 1.0 in 10 equal bins (each 0.1 wide), with the top value included in the lower of each bin (Figure 5). The ORs and other details are shown in Additional file 1: Table E5.
Figure 5

Survival curves by FAB score (binned). FAB Scores closer to 0.0 have the lowest risk of death, and those closest to 1.0 have the greatest risk of death. FAB, follistatin, and activin A and B.

Use of this predictive model in the individual diagnostic groups

The use of this predictive model in the individual diagnostic groups was not equally predictive in each group. As is evident in Figure 3, not all the diagnostic groups had levels of activin A and B above the reference mean or reference maximum and hence in our predictive model the diagnostic group is used to account for differences in the relative mortality risk in each group. Using the FAB score and applying it to each diagnostic group individually demonstrates that it performed well, statistically significantly above the null hypothesis area of 0.5 for on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, in all but three of the groups (Additional file 1: Table E7). This is primarily due to the lower numbers in groups 4, 9 and 10. Another factor is that the outcomes can be remote from the causative factor for the ARF and that some groups are heterogeneous.

Discussion

This paper provides a unique dataset on serum levels of activin A and B, and follistatin in critically ill patients, had ARF, and were in the ICU. These data, with the establishment of normal ranges for the assays based on substantive numbers of healthy volunteers, enable a critical appraisal of the value of these measurements for diagnostic and predictive purposes. The findings of this study establish that the concentrations of both activin A and B are substantially increased in most of the diagnostic groups of critically ill patients with ARF. This is in keeping with the demonstration that activin A is a key regulator of the inflammatory response induced by LPS [11] and the small study that indicated that there were substantial increases in patients in the ICU with septicemia [9].

In addition, the present study demonstrates that serum activin B levels were substantially elevated in a large proportion of this critically ill cohort. Further, having activin B levels above the reference maximum (combined with other factors) gives the best predictor of mortality subsequent to admission. This finding is of interest, given that although clear data in mice and humans indicate that activin A is a major controller of the inflammatory response [9, 11, 30], very little is known about the role of activin B in inflammation and fibrosis.

The advantages of measuring activin A and B are that an elevated measurement of these proteins (A and/or B) at 2 days after the initiation of ventilation, still has predictive power at 12 months after admission to the ICU. Adding the activin A and B measurements improves upon the already robust base model (Table 3), as shown by the significant NRI and IDI results, and therefore identifies patients who are currently not detected as being of higher mortality risk.

Activin A stimulates macrophages to produce nitric oxide [31], and increasing activin A levels results in apoptosis of hepatocytes and B lymphocytes, resulting in liver failure and suppression of immunological responses, both of which can cause death [32, 33]. Further, activin A stimulates fibroblast mitosis in vitro and in vivo, as well as expression of metallo-matrix proteases in macrophages after experimental induction of myocardial infarction [3436]. The latter is consistent with the elevated activin A levels in group 3 consisting of patients with non-operative cardiovascular conditions associated with ARF, and with Ynestad and colleagues [36], who noted that the magnitude of the increase in activin A levels paralleled the increasing severity of the cardiac failure. In this group, activin B levels were also elevated, again providing a novel finding, the pathophysiological basis of which is unknown. Apart from the capacity for activin B as well as activin A to cause apoptosis of MPC-11 cells, there is a paucity of data concerning its actions [37] other than experiments wherein substitution of the βB subunit for βA in mice suggested that the βB subunit acted as a partial agonist when compared to the βA subunit [38].

This large patient cohort adds substantially to the available data in humans and further supports the concept that activin A, and now activin B, are valuable markers of inflammatory responses. We recognize that this paper provides data from a study performed some time ago. A new prospective study is now required that builds in the analysis of the activins and follistatin in the management of patients with ARF in the ICU.

The importance of activin A as a major regulator of the inflammatory response is supported by its capacity to stimulate monocytes/macrophages to produce a number of inflammatory mediators including IL1β, TNFα, IL6, nitric oxide, prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane [3941]. Further, studies in mouse models and human data clearly establish a role for this protein in inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, allergy-induced asthma and wound healing [14, 4245]. Further, studies following the progress of patients with multiple forms of inflammatory diseases using the activins and follistatin as markers would establish the value of using the levels of both activins A and B as markers of organ function in inflammation.

There may be multiple factors linking these proteins to survival and these are summarized in Figure 6. In acute experiments that used a lethal LPS challenge in mice, those with the highest activin A levels had the greatest mortality [11]. Proof that these elevated activin A levels caused death emerged from halving the LPS-induced mortality by the administration of follistatin, which binds activin A virtually irreversibly and targets the complex to a lysosomal degradation pathway [12, 13, 46]. Although not formally addressed, the rapid action of follistatin in halving the LPS-induced mortality, usually within 24 hours, may result from blocking the rapid increase in nitric oxide arising from the stimulation of macrophages by activin A, causing hypotension [31]. However, the longer-term impact on survival and its prediction by the measurement of activins A and B are likely to be related to the capacity of elevated levels of activin A to cause apoptosis of hepatocytes, decreasing liver function and compromising immunological defense mechanisms resulting from the apoptosis of B lymphocytes. In addition, elevated activin A levels drive fibrosis and this may lead to limitation of pulmonary, hepatic and renal function [9, 34, 41, 44]. Further, elevated activin A levels can cause cachexia resulting from activin A signaling through type II and type I receptors [47]. This pathway, shared by myostatin, leads to the stimulation of the Smad2/3/4 pathway resulting in the dephosphorylation of the transcription factor foxo3a and leading to its nuclear retention [48]. The increased levels of nuclear foxo3a induce the expression of muscle specific ubiquitin ligases, MuRF-1 and Atrogin-1, which stimulate the degradation of myofibrillar proteins such as myosin, resulting in marked muscle wasting [49]. Although a role for activin B in cachexia is yet to be established, activin B can act through the same signaling pathway via Smad 2/3/4 and also can activate the pathway via ALK7, another type 1 receptor [50].
Figure 6

Diagrammatic summary of the actions of the activins as they pertain to the lung. These proteins are produced in neutrophils, macrophages, fibroblasts, the endothelium and the bronchial epithelium, as well as multiple sites in other tissues, details of which are found in the review by Hedger et al. [9]. (NO) Nitric oxide.

Defining the pathways through which high activin A levels cause death is of critical importance as therapeutic options will become available using follistatin, which has the capacity to bind and neutralize the actions of both activin A and B. Further, the development of soluble activin receptor blockers offer alternative possibilities for more selective treatment as follistatin also inhibits the actions of several of the bone morphogenetic proteins, growth and differentiation factor (GDF) 8 (myostatin), GDF9, and TGFβ3 [9].

In this context, it was surprising that the activin to follistatin ratio did not correlate with long-term survival and it was clear that concentrations of follistatin were higher in those patients who died than those who survived, at D7. In part, this probably results from the increased levels of activin A and B, measured in these severely ill patients, to stimulate follistatin levels.

Conclusions

This study establishes that activins A and B, novel modulators of inflammation and fibrosis, are elevated in a large number of patients with ARF in the ICU. It also demonstrates the value of measuring their levels in the management of critically ill patients in intensive care, as patients with elevated levels of both activins above the normal range are more likely to die at 3 and 12 months after their admission to the ICU with ARF. These higher mortality rates are the likely result of the ability of increased levels of activin A to cause inflammation and the production of nitric oxide, and induce apoptosis of hepatocytes and B lymphocytes. Further, as activin A also induces fibrosis in multiple tissues, such as the lung, liver and kidney, it has the capacity to cause sub-optimal organ function, thereby contributing to poor survival [8, 11, 41]. These data should stimulate the development of inhibitors of the action of the activins such as follistatin as therapeutic agents.

Key messages

  • ARF, particularly in the ICU, results in significant mortality. Novel biomarkers are needed to predict patient outcomes and guide potential future therapies.

  • We demonstrated that the novel modulators of inflammation and fibrosis, activins A, B and follistatin, are elevated in the majority of patients with ARF and marked increases are linked to poor outcomes.

  • The severity of the increases in serum levels of activins A and B can assist in the prediction of the outcomes in ARF and helps to identify those patients at greatest risk of death, thereby establishing the basis for the development of new therapeutic agents targeted at modulating the bioactivity of these protein biomarkers.

Notes

Abbreviations

ALI: 

Acute lung injury

APACHE: 

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation

ARDS: 

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ARF: 

Acute respiratory failure

AUC: 

Area under the curve

BMI: 

Body mass index

ELISA: 

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

FAB score: 

Follisatin, Activin A and B score

GDF8: 

growth differentiation factor 8 (myostatin)

GDF9: 

Growth differentiation factor 9

IDI: 

Integrated discrimination improvement index

IL: 

Interleukin

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccharide

LR: 

Likelihood ratio

MDLP: 

Minimum description length principle

NRI: 

Net reclassification index

OR: 

Odds ratio

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic

SAPS: 

Simplified acute physiology score

SEM: 

Standard error of the mean

SOFA: 

Sequential organ failure assessment

TGFβ: 

Transforming growth factor beta

TNFα: 

Tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The assistance of Oxford Brookes University in providing access to the reagents for both the activin A and B assays is gratefully acknowledged. The support of the National Health and Medical Research Council (Fellowships to MPH and RIMcL) and the Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank all the participating hospitals and investigators in the FINNALI study: Satakunta Central Hospital: Dr Vesa Lund, Päivi Tuominen, Pauliina Perkola; East Savo Central Hospital: Dr Markku Suvela, Sirpa Kauppinen, Anne-Marja Turkulainen; Central Finland Central Hospital: Dr Raili Laru-Sompa, Tiina Kirkhope, Sirpa Nykänen; South Savo Central Hospital: Dr Heikki Laine, Kirsi Reponen, Pekka Kettunen; North Karelia Central Hospital: Dr Matti Reinikainen, Tanja Eiserbeck, Helena Jyrkönen; Seinäjoki Central Hospital: Dr Kari Saarinen, Dr Matti Viitanen, Niina Siirilä, Johanna Soini; South Karelia Central Hospital: Dr Seppo Hovilehto, Dr Anne Kirsi, Dr Pekka Tiainen, Sanna Asikainen; Päijät-Häme Central Hospital: Dr Pekka Loisa; Vaasa Central Hospital, Dr Pentti Kairi; Kanta-Häme Central Hospital: Dr Risto Puolakka, Piia Laitinen, Tarja Heikkilä; Lappi Central Hospital: Dr Outi Kiviniemi, Tarja Laurila, Tiina Pikkuhookana; Keski-Pohjanmaa Central Hospital: Dr Samuli Forsström, Dr Tadeusz Kaminski, Tuija Kuusela; Kymenlaakso Central Hospital: Dr Jussi Pentti, Dr Seija Alila, Reija Koskinen; Helsinki University Hospital: Jorvi Hospital: Dr Tero Varpula, Mira Rahkonen; Meilahti Hospital ICU: Dr Anne Kuitunen, Dr Anna-Maija Korhonen, Dr Rita Linko, Dr Marjatta Okkonen, Janne Myller, Jarmo Pekkola, Leena Pettilä, Sari Sutinen; Meilahti Hospital, Cardiac Surgical ICU: Dr Raili Suojaranta-Ylinen, Dr Sinikka Kukkonen, Elina Nurmi-Toivonen; Meilahti Hospital, Department of Medicine: Dr Tom Bäcklund, Dr Juhani Rossinen, Riina Mäkelä; Töölö Hospital: Dr Janne Reitala, Dr Jyrki Vuola, Raija Niemi, Marja-Leena Pihlajamaa, Aira Uusipaavalniemi; Surgical Hospital: Dr Anna-Maria Koivusalo, Pasi Kyllönen; Turku University Hospital: Dr Juha Perttilä, Dr Erkki Kentala, Dr Olli Arola, Dr Outi Inkinen, Jutta Kotamäki; Tampere University Hospital: Dr Sari Karlsson, Dr Jyrki Tenhunen, Minna-Liisa Peltola, Sanna Mäkinen, Anna-Liina Korkala, Samuli Kortelainen; Kuopio University Hospital: Dr Esko Ruokonen, Dr Ilkka Parviainen, Sari Rahikainen, Elina Halonen; Oulu University Hospital: Dr Tero Ala-Kokko, Dr Jouko Laurila, Sinikka Sälkiö, Tarja Lamberg.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University
(2)
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University
(3)
Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital
(4)
Prince Henry’s Institute
(5)
Oxford Brookes University

References

  1. Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L: Increased use of noninvasive ventilation in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2006, 32: 1747-1755. 10.1007/s00134-006-0229-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Flaatten H, Gjerde S, Guttormsen AB, Haugen O, Hoivik T, Onarheim H, Aardal S: Outcome after acute respiratory failure is more dependent on dysfunction in other vital organs than on the severity of the respiratory failure. Crit Care. 2003, 7: R72-10.1186/cc2331.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Linko R, Okkonen M, Pettila V, Perttila J, Parviainen I, Ruokonen E, Tenhunen J, Ala-Kokko T, Varpula T, group FI-s: Acute respiratory failure in intensive care units. FINNALI: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 35: 1352-1361. 10.1007/s00134-009-1519-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Roupie E, Lepage E, Wysocki M, Fagon JY, Chastre J, Dreyfuss D, Mentec H, Carlet J, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F, Brochard L: Prevalence, etiologies and outcome of the acute respiratory distress syndrome among hypoxemic ventilated patients. SRLF Collaborative Group on Mechanical Ventilation. Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise. Intensive Care Med. 1999, 25: 920-929. 10.1007/s001340050983.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vincent JL, Akca S, De Mendonca A, Haji-Michael P, Sprung C, Moreno R, Antonelli M, Suter PM, assessment SWGSof: The epidemiology of acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients(*). Chest. 2002, 121: 1602-1609. 10.1378/chest.121.5.1602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Ranieri VM: Epidemiology and outcome of acute respiratory failure in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2003, 31: S296-S299. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057906.89552.8F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alia I, Brochard L, Stewart TE, Benito S, Epstein SK, Apezteguia C, Nightingale P, et al: Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA. 2002, 287: 345-355. 10.1001/jama.287.3.345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Behrendt CE: Acute respiratory failure in the United States: incidence and 31-day survival. Chest. 2000, 118: 1100-1105. 10.1378/chest.118.4.1100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hedger MP, Winnall WR, Phillips DJ, de Kretser DM: The regulation and functions of activin and follistatin in inflammation and immunity. Vitam Horm. 2011, 85: 255-297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones KL, de Kretser DM, Clarke IJ, Scheerlinck JP, Phillips DJ: Characterisation of the rapid release of activin A following acute lipopolysaccharide challenge in the ewe. J Endocrinol. 2004, 182: 69-80. 10.1677/joe.0.1820069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones KL, Mansell A, Patella S, Scott BJ, Hedger MP, de Kretser DM, Phillips DJ: Activin A is a critical component of the inflammatory response, and its binding protein, follistatin, reduces mortality in endotoxemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 16239-16244. 10.1073/pnas.0705971104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakamura T, Takio K, Eto Y, Shibai H, Titani K, Sugino H: Activin-binding protein from rat ovary is follistatin. Science. 1990, 247: 836-838. 10.1126/science.2106159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sugino K, Kurosawa N, Nakamura T, Takio K, Shimasaki S, Ling N, Titani K, Sugino H: Molecular heterogeneity of follistatin, an activin-binding protein. Higher affinity of the carboxyl-terminal truncated forms for heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the ovarian granulosa cell. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 15579-15587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Aoki F, Kurabayashi M, Hasegawa Y, Kojima I: Attenuation of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by follistatin. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005, 172: 713-720. 10.1164/rccm.200412-1620OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu H, Chen Y, Winnall WR, Phillips DJ, Hedger MP: Acute regulation of activin A and its binding protein, follistatin, in serum and tissues following lipopolysaccharide treatment of adult male mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012, 303: R665-R675. 10.1152/ajpregu.00478.2011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Apostolou E, Stavropoulos A, Sountoulidis A, Xirakia C, Giaglis S, Protopapadakis E, Ritis K, Mentzelopoulos S, Pasternack A, Foster M, et al: Activin-A overexpression in the murine lung causes pathology that simulates acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012, 185: 382-391. 10.1164/rccm.201105-0784OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Michel U, Ebert S, Phillips D, Nau R: Serum concentrations of activin and follistatin are elevated and run in parallel in patients with septicemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003, 148: 559-564. 10.1530/eje.0.1480559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baccarelli A, Morpurgo PS, Corsi A, Vaghi I, Fanelli M, Cremonesi G, Vaninetti S, Beck-Peccoz P, Spada A: Activin A serum levels and aging of the pituitary-gonadal axis: a cross-sectional study in middle-aged and elderly healthy subjects. Exp Gerontol. 2001, 36: 1403-1412. 10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00117-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Loria P, Petraglia F, Concari M, Bertolotti M, Martella P, Luisi S, Grisolia C, Foresta C, Volpe A, Genazzani AR, Carulli N: Influence of age and sex on serum concentrations of total dimeric activin A. Eur J Endocrinol. 1998, 139: 487-492. 10.1530/eje.0.1390487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R: The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994, 149: 818-824. 10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993, 270: 2957-2963. 10.1001/jama.1993.03510240069035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S: Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on “sepsis-related problems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998, 26: 1793-1800. 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985, 13: 818-829. 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Knight PG, Muttukrishna S, Groome NP: Development and application of a two-site enzyme immunoassay for the determination of 'total’ activin-A concentrations in serum and follicular fluid. J Endocrinol. 1996, 148: 267-279. 10.1677/joe.0.1480267.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ludlow H, Phillips DJ, Myers M, McLachlan RI, de Kretser DM, Allan CA, Anderson RA, Groome NP, Hyvonen M, Duncan WC, Muttukrishna S: A new 'total’ activin B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): development and validation for human samples. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009, 71: 867-873. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03567.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Connor AE, McFarlane JR, Hayward S, Yohkaichiya T, Groome NP, de Kretser DM: Serum activin A and follistatin concentrations during human pregnancy: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14: 827-832. 10.1093/humrep/14.3.827.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Steyerberg EW, Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Grobbee DE, Moons KG: Internal and external validation of predictive models: a simulation study of bias and precision in small samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003, 56: 441-447. 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00047-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD: Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54: 774-781. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00341-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS: Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008, 27: 157-172. 10.1002/sim.2929. discussion 207-112View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones KL, de Kretser DM, Patella S, Phillips DJ: Activin A and follistatin in systemic inflammation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004, 225: 119-125. 10.1016/j.mce.2004.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nusing RM, Barsig J: Induction of prostanoid, nitric oxide, and cytokine formation in rat bone marrow derived macrophages by activin A. Br J Pharmacol. 1999, 127: 919-926. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702626.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwall RH, Robbins K, Jardieu P, Chang L, Lai C, Terrell TG: Activin induces cell death in hepatocytes in vivo and in vitro. Hepatology. 1993, 18: 347-356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zipori D, Barda-Saad M: Role of activin A in negative regulation of normal and tumor B lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 2001, 69: 867-873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hedger MP, Drummond AE, Robertson DM, Risbridger GP, de Kretser DM: Inhibin and activin regulate [3H]thymidine uptake by rat thymocytes and 3T3 cells in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1989, 61: 133-138. 10.1016/0303-7207(89)90198-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ogawa K, Funaba M, Mathews LS, Mizutani T: Activin A stimulates type IV collagenase (matrix metalloproteinase-2) production in mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Immunol. 2000, 165: 2997-3003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yndestad A, Ueland T, Oie E, Florholmen G, Halvorsen B, Attramadal H, Simonsen S, Froland SS, Gullestad L, Christensen G, et al: Elevated levels of activin A in heart failure: potential role in myocardial remodeling. Circulation. 2004, 109: 1379-1385. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000120704.97934.41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips DJ, Brauman JN, Mason AJ, de Kretser DM, Hedger MP: A sensitive and specific in vitro bioassay for activin using a mouse plasmacytoma cell line, MPC-11. J Endocrinol. 1999, 162: 111-116. 10.1677/joe.0.1620111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Brown CW, Li L, Houston-Hawkins DE, Matzuk MM: Activins are critical modulators of growth and survival. Mol Endocrinol. 2003, 17: 2404-2417. 10.1210/me.2003-0051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nusing RM, Barsig J: Inflammatory potency of activin A. Effect on prostanoid and nitric oxide formation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997, 407: 243-248. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1813-0_36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nusing RM, Mohr S, Ullrich V: Activin A and retinoic acid synergize in cyclooxygenase-1 and thromboxane synthase induction during differentiation of J774.1 macrophages. Eur J Biochem. 1995, 227: 130-136. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20368.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamashita S, Maeshima A, Kojima I, Nojima Y: Activin A is a potent activator of renal interstitial fibroblasts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004, 15: 91-101. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000103225.68136.E6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dohi T, Ejima C, Kato R, Kawamura YI, Kawashima R, Mizutani N, Tabuchi Y, Kojima I: Therapeutic potential of follistatin for colonic inflammation in mice. Gastroenterology. 2005, 128: 411-423. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hardy CL, Lemasurier JS, Olsson F, Dang T, Yao J, Yang M, Plebanski M, Phillips DJ, Mollard R, Rolland JM, O’Hehir RE: Interleukin-13 regulates secretion of the tumor growth factor-{beta} superfamily cytokine activin A in allergic airway inflammation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010, 42: 667-675. 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0429OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Patella S, Phillips DJ, Tchongue J, de Kretser DM, Sievert W: Follistatin attenuates early liver fibrosis: effects on hepatic stellate cell activation and hepatocyte apoptosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006, 290: G137-G144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wankell M, Munz B, Hubner G, Hans W, Wolf E, Goppelt A, Werner S: Impaired wound healing in transgenic mice overexpressing the activin antagonist follistatin in the epidermis. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 5361-5372. 10.1093/emboj/20.19.5361.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hashimoto O, Nakamura T, Shoji H, Shimasaki S, Hayashi Y, Sugino H: A novel role of follistatin, an activin-binding protein, in the inhibition of activin action in rat pituitary cells. Endocytotic degradation of activin and its acceleration by follistatin associated with cell-surface heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 13835-13842. 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Matzuk MM, Kumar TR, Vassalli A, Bickenbach JR, Roop DR, Jaenisch R, Bradley A: Functional analysis of activins during mammalian development. Nature. 1995, 374: 354-356. 10.1038/374354a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou X, Wang JL, Lu J, Song Y, Kwak KS, Jiao Q, Rosenfeld R, Chen Q, Boone T, Simonet WS, et al: Reversal of cancer cachexia and muscle wasting by ActRIIB antagonism leads to prolonged survival. Cell. 2010, 142: 531-543. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tisdale MJ: Reversing cachexia. Cell. 2010, 142: 511-512. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsuchida K, Nakatani M, Uezumi A, Murakami T, Cui X: Signal transduction pathway through activin receptors as a therapeutic target of musculoskeletal diseases and cancer. Endocr J. 2008, 55: 11-21. 10.1507/endocrj.KR-110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© de Kretser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement