Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Suspected ventilator-associated respiratory infection in severely ill patients: a prospective observational study

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 2, 3Email author
Critical Care201317:R251

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13077

  • Received: 18 July 2013
  • Accepted: 27 September 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Introduction

Ventilator-associated respiratory infection (VARI) is an important cause of morbidity in critically-ill patients. Clinical trials performed in heterogeneous populations have suggested there are limited benefits from invasive diagnostic testing to identify patients at risk or to target antimicrobial therapy. However, multiple patient subgroups (for example, immunocompromised, antibiotic-treated) have traditionally been excluded from randomization. We hypothesized that a prospective surveillance study would better identify patients with suspected VARI (sVARI) at high risk for adverse clinical outcomes, and who might be specifically targeted in future trials.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational study in all patients ventilated for greater than 48 hours. sVARI was identified by surveillance for changes in white blood cell count, temperature, sputum, and/or new chest X-ray infiltrates. Indices of disease co-morbidity, as well as mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital or ICU stay were correlated with sVARI.

Results

Of 1806 patients admitted to the ICU over 14 months, 267 were ventilated for greater than 48 hours, and 77 developed sVARI. Incidence of sVARI was associated with iatrogenic immunosuppression or admission for respiratory illness. Any sVARI, whether suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (sVAP) or ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (sVAT), was associated with increased length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.

Conclusions

Clinical surveillance for sVARI identifies patients at risk for increased morbidity. Iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients, a subgroup previously excluded from randomized clinical trials, represent a growing proportion of the critically-ill at risk for sVARI who might be targeted for future investigations on diagnostic or therapeutic modalities.

Keywords

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Hospital Length
  • Adverse Clinical Outcome
  • Bacteriological Diagnosis
  • Abnormal White Blood Cell

Introduction

Ventilator-associated respiratory infection (VARI), which includes ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT), is a common acquired infection in the ICU that contributes to excess length of stay, duration of ventilation, cost and likely mortality [1, 2]. The pathogenesis is thought to involve predisposition to microbial colonization and aspiration of pathogenic organisms from the upper respiratory tract [2]. In agreement, prevention strategies that minimize colonization and aspiration (for example, anti-microbial-coated endotracheal tubes, semi-erect feeding) have significantly reduced the incidence of VAP [1]. However, the associated morbidity, antibiotic usage and cost remain high [3]. Many have advocated the use of invasive lower respiratory tract sampling to target pathogenic organisms better and to limit the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Nonetheless, in part due to the poor predictive value of microbial cultures, current guidelines reflect ambivalence regarding the utility of lower respiratory tract sampling and/or quantitative cultures in the management of VAP [1, 4].

The use of invasive strategies to improve diagnostic accuracy and prescribe targeted therapies was examined in two large trials. In one study, quantitative cultures of lower respiratory tract samples resulted in reduced mortality, antibiotic use and organ failure [5]. In a more recent trial, there was no survival benefit for the use of invasive techniques [6]. A systematic review based on these, and two other small clinical trials [710], suggested that there is no effect of invasive sampling or quantitative cultures on mortality in patients with suspected VAP. However, the trials excluded the majority of screened patients, or those patients with risk factors commonly encountered in contemporary quaternary care ICUs (for example, iatrogenic immunosuppression, previous bacterial colonization, concurrent use of broad spectrum antibiotics).

Since exclusion of patients at high risk may lead to underestimation of the effects of interventions on clinical outcomes, we questioned whether the study populations reflect those patients encountered in current quaternary care clinical practice. We hypothesized that a prospective analysis of patients at risk for VARI might better identify associated risk factors independent of respiratory tract samples for bacterial diagnosis, and that VAP need not be distinguished from VAT. Here, we identify patient subgroups at higher risk of morbidity that can be targeted, and not excluded, in future clinical trials on diagnostic and therapeutic modalities in the personalized treatment of VARI independent of bacteriological diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Study population

Over a period of 14 months (1 May 2007 to 31 July 2008), all patients in the ICU unit at the McGill University Hospital Centre who were mechanically ventilated for longer than 48 hours were prospectively identified on a daily basis. All study patients were more than 18 years old. The study was reviewed and approved by the McGill University Health Centre research ethics board. Data were collected by prospective or retrospective chart review or database search, with permission from the hospital Director of Professional Services, and as dictated by the approved ethics protocol. Patient consent was not required for the use of anonymous chart-based clinical or laboratory data.

Data collection

Prospective data collection for the identification of suspected VARI (sVARI) included the highest temperature in the last 24 hours, white blood cell count (WBC) and neutrophil count, as well as increased quantity of respiratory secretions. Sputum was characterized as being of small, moderate, or large amounts. For patients with suspected VARI, chest X-ray or computed tomography (CT) chest changes compatible with pneumonia at the time of surveillance were identified by two physicians and a radiologist by inspection of digital images or reports. In addition, at the time of surveillance, we recorded the duration of mechanical ventilation in days and antibiotic or immunosuppressive medications. After prospective data collection had terminated, we extracted the following parameters for each patient from our hospital clinical database: age, sex, primary diagnosis at admission, associated co-morbidities (see Table 1), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (Apache II) score [11], mortality, total duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU, and length of stay in hospital. When available, we retrieved results of upper respiratory tract bacterial cultures for patients with sVARI.
Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics of the total cohort and those with suspected ventilator associated respiratory infection (sVARI)

 

Total cohort (267)

No VARI (190)

Suspected VARI (77)

P value

Median age (IQR)

55 (46 to 65)

55(46 to 67)

55(46 to 66)

0.77

Male sex (%)

166 (62.7)

116(61.1)

50(64.9)

0.55

Primary diagnosis at admission a

    

  Respiratory

51 (18.8)

30(15.8)

20(26.0)

0.05

  Cardiovascular

8 (3.0)

6(3.2)

2(2.6)

0.81

  Gastroenterological

20 (7.4)

14(7.4)

6(7.8)

0.91

  Neurological

3 (1.11)

3(1.6)

0

0.27

  Sepsis

45 (16.6)

29(15.3)

16(20.8)

0.28

  Post-operative

109 (40.2)

79(41.6)

28(36.4)

0.43

  Post arrest

8 (3.0)

8(4.2)

0

0.07

  Other

8 (3.0)

14 (7.4)

5(6.5)

0.80

Co-morbidities

    

  Diabetes

92 (34.0)

64(33.7)

26(33.8)

0.99

  COPD/Asthma

51 (18.8)

34(17.9)

17(22.1)

0.43

  CAD

132 (48.7)

94(49.5)

36(46.8)

0.69

  CHF

77 (28.4)

52(27.4)

25(32.5)

0.41

  Liver disease

54 (19.9)

38(20.0)

15(19.5)

0.92

  Malignancy

73 (26.9)

47(24.7)

25(32.5)

0.20

  Dementia

9 (3.3)

5(2.6)

4(5.2)

0.3

  Immunosuppressed

34 (12.7)

17 (9.0)

17(22.1)

0.004

  Stroke

29 (10.7)

23(12.1)

6(7.8)

0.31

CRF

75 (27.7)

52(27.4)

23(29.9)

0.68

APACHE II Score b (IQR)

27 (22 to 34)

27(21 to 36)

27(22 to 33)

0.83

aNineteen patients had missing initial diagnoses; bAPACHE scores available for 64% of the cohort. The remainder of patients consisted of cardiac surgery admissions for which the APACHE score has not been validated. APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; CRF, chronic renal failure; IQR, interquartile range.

Definitions

For each patient, sVARI was defined as the first occurrence of suspected VAP (sVAP) or suspected VAT (sVAT). sVAP was defined as a change in the chest X-ray consistent with pneumonia, and two of the following: WBC ≥11 or <4, temperature ≥38.0 or <36.0°C, or an increase in sputum. sVAT was defined as an increase in sputum with WBC ≥11 or <4, and temperature ≥38.0 or <36.0°C (adapted from [12]). Iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients were identified prospectively as those who were administered immunosuppressive medications (for example, calcineurin inhibitors, anti-metabolite DNA synthesis inhibitors, lymphotoxic agents, mTOR inhibitors, high-dose steroids) on the day of surveillance for sVARI. Other conditions associated with relative immunosuppression (for example, diabetes, cancer, liver disease, chronic renal failure) were accounted for in multivariable analyses. We did not adjust for rare cases of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, as neutropenia was a criterion for the diagnosis of sVARI.

Statistical analysis

We analyzed all baseline characteristics for the total cohort and for groups of patients without or with sVARI. We explored all variables with frequency distributions and cross tabulations. For normally distributed continuous data, results were expressed as means ± standard deviation and compared using two-tailed Student’s t-test. For skewed continuous data, results were expressed as medians ± interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables were compared using a Chi-squared test.

A multivariable analysis was conducted using logistic regression to assess the association between immunosuppression and sVARI. In order to adjust for confounding, a priori chosen covariates were included in the model. No statistical selection process was used for model covariate selection. Specifically, we adjusted for age, diabetes, liver disease, malignancy and chronic renal failure. APACHE II score was not included due to the inclusion of a large proportion of cardiac surgery patients, for which the APACHE II score was not originally validated. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the association between skewed continuous variables (for example, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay) and sVARI while adjusting for a priori covariates. To account for the skewed nature of the data the continuous outcome variable was log transformed prior to model development. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata Version 10.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station TX, USA).

Results

Over the course of 14 months, 1,806 patients were admitted to the ICU, and in 287 (14.8%) of these the duration of mechanical ventilation was more than 48 hours. There was a total of 3,202 ventilator days or 2,068 ventilator days per 1,000 patients per year. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 10 days (IQR, 5 to 15 days). During the study period, 77 patients developed sVARI (Figure 1). Of the 77 patients with sVARI, 62% had sVAT and 38% sVAP. For the 62 respiratory tract microbial cultures retrospectively retrieved in patients with sVARI, the spectrum of organisms was similar to that observed in other quaternary care ICUs (see Additional file 1). The median time to sVARI was five days (IQR, three to eight days), and one third occurred within three days of initiation of mechanical ventilation (see Additional file 2).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Patient flow. A flow diagram for patients at risk for suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia, and identification of patients with suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (sVAT) or suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (sVAP), are shown.

We determined baseline demographics, as well as indicators of diagnostic spectrum or severity of illness (Table 1). The median age was 55 years, and two thirds of the patients were men. The most common reason for admission was for post-operative monitoring after complicated surgery or intra-operative complications. Respiratory illness or sepsis were also common diagnoses, and together accounted for one third of admissions to the ICU. The most frequent comorbidities were diabetes and coronary artery disease. Active malignancy and iatrogenic immunosuppression (referred to as immunosuppression from here on) were also common and occurred in 26.9% and 12.7% of patients, respectively. The median APACHE II score was 27 (IQR, 22 to 34).

In immunosuppressed patients, sVARI occurred more commonly than no sVARI (22.1% versus 9%, P = 0.004). Other than patients admitted with respiratory disease (sVARI 26% versus no sVARI 15.8%, P = 0.05), there were no significant differences for other co-morbidities listed in Table 1. Of the 77 patients with a new diagnosis of sVARI, 51 (66%) were concurrently undergoing administration of broad spectrum antibiotics. Patients with sVARI had increased duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, but not mortality, when compared to patients with no infection (Table 2). When compared to non-immunocompromised patients with sVARI, those who were immunocompromised exhibited increased median ICU length of stay (26 days, IQR 20 to 44 versus 16 days, IQR 11 to 31; P = 0.08) and hospital length of stay (113 days, IQR 76 to 154 versus 46 days, 95% CI 29 to 91; P <0.002), but not mortality (47% versus 35%; not significant) or duration of mechanical ventilation (9 days, IQR 4 to 15 versus 9 days, IQR 6 to 15; not significant). In a multivariable analysis, immunosuppression was significantly associated with sVARI even after adjusting for other chronic diseases associated with reduced immune function (odds ratio 3.34, 95% CI 1.47 to 7.61, P = 0.004) (Table 3).
Table 2

Clinical outcomes of total cohort and patients with and without sVARI

 

Total cohort (271)

No VARI (238)

Suspected VARI (77)

PaValue

ICU mortality number (%)

92 (34.1)

63(33.3)

29(37.7)

0.50

Median number of days on ventilator (IQR)

6 (4 to 12)

6(3 to 10)b

9(6 to 15)

0.0002

Median number of days in ICU (IQR)

12 (7 to 23)

11(7 to 20)

18(11 to 36)

<0.001

Median number of days in hospital (IQR)

39 (19 to 80)

34(16 to 69)

60(33 to 129)

<0.001

aP value relates to patients with and without suspected VARI; b21 patients (11%) with missing data for vent days. IQR, interquartile range; VARI, ventilator-associated respiratory infection.

Table 3

Association between immunosuppression and sVARI by multivariable analysis

Baseline characteristics

Odds ratio

Confidence interval (95%)

P-value

Immunosuppressed

3.34

1.47 to 7.61

0.004

Age

   

   <50

1.0

-

 

  50 to 70

0.78

0.34 to 1.79

0.36

   >70

0.89

0.38 to 2.11

 

Diabetes

0.94

0.51 to 1.73

0.87

Liver disease

0.78

0.37 to 1.61

0.50

Malignancy

1.30

0.71 to 2.39

0.85

CRF

0.92

0.51 to 1.73

0.80

CRF, chronic renal failure; sVARI, suspected ventilator-associated respiratory infection.

We next determined the distribution of sVARI sub-types, and their effects on patient outcomes. Forty-eight (62%) patients with sVARI had tracheobronchitis (sVAT) (see Additional file 1). Of the 29 (38%) patients with sVAP, 19 exhibited abnormal white blood cell count or sputum production, but not temperature. Only three patients with sVARI developed all four diagnostic criteria for sVAP. These data indicate that the classical signs and symptoms associated with VAP are often absent, and that sVAT occurs in a large proportion (62%) of patients with sVARI.

We therefore determined whether sVAP and sVAT differed in their effects on ICU or hospital length of stay. When compared with patients with no infection, those with sVAP had a significantly increased ICU (16 days, IQR 12 to 24 versus 11 days, IQR 7 to 20, P <0.01) or hospital (57 days, IQR 35 to 83 versus 34 days, IQR 16 to 69, P <0.01) length of stay (Figure 2). Patients with sVAT had increased ICU (19 days, IQR 11 to 44 versus 11 days, IQR 7 to 20, P <0.003) or hospital (64 days, IQR 32 to 152 versus 34 days, IQR 16 to 69, P <0.001) length of stay. In a separate multivariable analysis, after adjusting for immunosuppressive medications, age, diabetes, liver disease, cancer and chronic renal failure, there was a 1.8-, 2.0-, and 1.5-fold increase in ICU length of stay for patients with sVARI, sVAT, and sVAP, respectively (each P <0.001). Similarly, there was a 1.6-, 1.8-, and 1.6-fold increase in hospital length of stay for patients with sVARI, sVAT and sVAP, respectively (P <0.001). These data indicate a significant effect of sVAP and sVAT on length of stay even when adjusting for immunosuppression.
Figure 2
Figure 2

ICU or hospital length of stay in patients with sVAP or sVAT. For patients with no suspected infection, sVAT or sVAP, median values ± interquartile range (IQR) are shown for A) ICU length of stay (days) or B) hospital length of stay (days). P <0.003 for sVAT or sVAP versus no infection by Wilcoxon rank sum test. sVAP, suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia; sVAT, suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes of sVARI over a 14 month period in the 267 patients who were ventilated for more than 48 hours in a quaternary care ICU. The diagnosis of sVARI incorporated ventilator-associated complications independent of bacteriological diagnosis and was associated with iatrogenic immunosuppression (that is, patients on immunosuppressive agents at the time of surveillance for sVARI) and respiratory illness, as well as an increased duration of mechanical ventilation, or length of stay in the ICU or hospital. Whereas most studies have focused on VAP, we found that sVAT was also associated with increased ICU or hospital length of stay. The rate of sVAT (18%) was slightly higher than that previously reported for VAT (that is, that incorporating bacterial culture results) [13]; a recent meta-analysis reported a frequency of 11.5% [14]. In support of the clinical importance of VAT, VAT and VAP had similar impacts on outcomes in a study where bacterial cultures were taken into account [13]. Moreover, anti-bacterial treatment of VAT increased mechanical ventilation-free days and survival in a small randomized trial [15]. Although our results suggest that clinical indicators of ventilator-associated respiratory tract infection identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes, the effect of respiratory tract sampling on patient outcomes or anti-bacterial usage in high-risk patients (for example, immunocompromised), or those already undergoing antibiotic therapy, remains unknown.

We report that iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients are at increased risk for VARI, which in turn impacts upon ICU and hospital length of stay. In agreement, patients with sVARI who were immunocompromised exhibited an increased duration of ICU and hospital stay when compared to those who were not immunocompromised. Consistent with our observations, a large surveillance study revealed that immunosuppression is an independent predictor of all infections in the ICU and more than 50% of infections were respiratory [16]. This subgroup of patients has been traditionally excluded from randomized trials on VAP. Moreover, in recent years, the use of immunosuppressive agents for transplantation or chronic inflammatory disease has dramatically increased, and this group of patients now represents a significant proportion of quaternary ICU admissions. Unlike randomized trials with heterogeneous patient populations [6], targeting a limited population at increased risk might shed light on the specific effects of lower respiratory tract sampling and microbial ecology on clinical outcomes in future studies.

Our prospective trial design permitted the assessment of sVARI on clinical outcomes independent of biases introduced by retrospective chart review. The large number of patients with solid organ and bone marrow transplantation in our ICU permitted the evaluation of factors associated with immunosuppression, which may have been missed by previous surveillance studies [12]. In fact, patients with active malignancy or immunosuppression represented 40% of our cohort. Reassuringly, demographics (for example, age, co-morbidities, admission diagnosis; Table 1) and microbial ecology (see Additional file 1) were comparable to previous studies on ventilator-associated infections, with the exception of patients with trauma, burn and primary neurological presentations. Consistent with previous studies, a primary respiratory diagnosis on admission was associated with sVARI [2]. Median duration of mechanical ventilation, APACHE II scores, rates of ventilator-associated complications, mortality and length of ICU or hospital stay (Tables 1 and 2) were also similar to those in other reports on patients who were ventilated for >48 hours [17]. Moreover, as previously reported [13], the majority of ventilator-associated events occurred within six days of initiation of mechanical ventilation (see Additional file 2).

We detected a significant association between immunosuppression and sVARI (Table 3, odds ratio 3.3, IQR 1.5 to 7.6). In addition, patients with sVARI exhibited increased ICU and hospital length of stay if they were immunosuppressed. However, due to a relatively low event rate (77 patients with sVARI), one limitation of our study was suboptimal power to rule out differences between certain groups, or to use our dataset to discover new markers of sVARI or related adverse clinical outcomes. Moreover, although the spectrum of organisms was similar to that observed in other studies on VAP (see Additional file 1), we did not collect microbiological samples for all patients and time points; we could, therefore, not assess the relationship between type of bacterial infection and demographic characteristics or clinical outcomes. With regard to the latter, many would argue that poor standardization and specificity renders bacteriological diagnosis suboptimal for the diagnosis of VAP or VAT, although they may be useful for surveillance (http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/vae). This may, in part, be due to the common use of broad spectrum antibiotics at the time of surveillance. In the current study, 66% of the patients were on broad-spectrum antibiotics at the time of sVARI. Similar antibiotic usage rates have been demonstrated in previous studies [13, 15, 16]. Importantly, patients on prior antibiotics were excluded from a negative trial evaluating lower respiratory tract sampling in VAP [6].

Conclusions

In summary, mechanically-ventilated patients at risk for adverse clinical outcomes can be identified on clinical grounds. Patients at risk include those who develop suspected VAP or VAT (that is, sVARI) and those who are iatrogenically immunosuppressed. Observational studies with larger sample sizes can be performed to rule out other risk factors for sVARI that were not identified in our study as statistically significant. Iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients represent an emerging population at risk for VARI that can be targeted in future randomized trials on the role of diagnostic or therapeutic modalities in ventilator-associated complications. Although there is a current emphasis on the identification of ‘ventilator-associated events (VAEs)’ as quality indicators in hospital-based health care delivery (http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/vae), our data highlight the importance of suspected VARIs as an important outcome for the development of targeted diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Key messages

  • Suspicion of ventilator-associated respiratory infection based on clinical criteria is associated with iatrogenic immunosuppression in critically ill patients.

  • Suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia or tracheobronchitis is equally associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

  • We identified patient groups at high risk for adverse outcomes that can be targeted in future clinical trials on diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for ventilator-associated infections.

  • Despite the current enthusiasm for a focus on ventilator-associated events as an outcome for hospital-acquired infections, VARIs remain important for identifying patients who might derive benefit from targeted diagnostic or therapeutic modalities.

Abbreviations

APACHE II: 

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II

CXR: 

Chest X-ray

IQR: 

Interquartile range

sVAP: 

suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia

sVARI: 

suspected ventilator-associated respiratory infection

sVAT: 

suspected ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis

VAP: 

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

VARI: 

Ventilator-associated respiratory infection

VAT: 

Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis

WBC: 

White blood cells.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Isabelle Lussier for providing technical assistance for extraction of data from the hospital database and Andrea Bennedetti, Ph.D. for advice on statistical analysis. This study was funded by a McGill University Health Centre Pilot award and Tier II Canada Research Chair in Pulmonary-Critical Care (AK).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Critical Care, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
(2)
Department of Medicine Respiratory Division, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
(3)
McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital Site, 687 Pine Ave. W., L3.05, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada

References

  1. American Thoracic Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America: Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005, 171: 388-416.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chastre J, Fagon JY: Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 165: 867-903. 10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2105078View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S: Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2005, 33: 2184-2193. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000181731.53912.D9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Coffin SE, Klompas M, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Anderson DJ, Burstin H, Calfee DP, Dubberke ER, Fraser V, Gerding DN, Griffin FA, Gross P, Kaye KS, Lo E, Marschall J, Mermel LA, Nicolle L, Pegues DA, Perl TM, Saint S, Salgado CD, Weinstein RA, Wise R, Yokoe DS: Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008,29(Suppl 1):S31-S40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Wolff M, Gervais C, Parer-Aubas S, Stephan F, Similowski T, Mercat A, Diehl JL, Sollet JP, Tenaillon A: Invasive and noninvasive strategies for management of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2000, 132: 621-630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Heyland D, Dodek P, Muscedere J, Day A: A randomized trial of diagnostic techniques for ventilator-associated pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2006, 355: 2619-2630.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ruiz M, Torres A, Ewig S, Marcos MA, Alcon A, Lledo R, Asenjo MA, Maldonaldo A: Noninvasive versus invasive microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia: evaluation of outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162: 119-125. 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9907090View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sole VJ, Fernandez JA, Benitez AB, Cardenosa Cendrero JA, Rodriguez de Castro F: Impact of quantitative invasive diagnostic techniques in the management and outcome of mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2000, 28: 2737-2741. 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Sanchez-Nieto JM, Torres A, Garcia-Cordoba F, El Ebiary M, Carrillo A, Ruiz J, Nunez ML, Niederman M: Impact of invasive and noninvasive quantitative culture sampling on outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 157: 371-376. 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.97-02039View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shorr AF, Sherner JH, Jackson WL, Kollef MH: Invasive approaches to the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2005, 33: 46-53. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000149852.32599.31View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985, 13: 818-829. 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouza E, Perez A, Munoz P, Jesus Perez M, Rincon C, Sanchez C, Martin-Rabadan P, Riesgo M, Cardiovascular Infection Study Group: Ventilator-associated pneumonia after heart surgery: a prospective analysis and the value of surveillance. Crit Care Med 2003, 31: 1964-1970. 10.1097/01.ccm.0000084807.15352.93View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dallas J, Skrupky L, Abebe N, Boyle WA 3rd, Kollef MH: Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in a mixed surgical and medical ICU population. Chest 2011, 139: 513-518. 10.1378/chest.10-1336View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Agrafiotis M, Siempos II, Falagas ME: Frequency, prevention, outcome and treatment of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Med 2010, 104: 325-336. 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.09.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nseir S, Favory R, Jozefowicz E, Decamps F, Dewavrin F, Brunin G, Di PC, Mathieu D, Durocher A: Antimicrobial treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Crit Care 2008, 12: R62. 10.1186/cc6890PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, Moreno R, Lipman J, Gomersall C, Sakr Y, Reinhart K, EPIC II: Group of Investigators: International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 2009, 302: 2323-2329. 10.1001/jama.2009.1754View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alia I, Brochard L, Stewart TE, Benito S, Epstein SK, Apezteguia C, Nightingale P, Arroliga AC, Tobin MJ, Mechanical Ventilation International Study Group: Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA 2002, 287: 345-35. 10.1001/jama.287.3.345View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shahin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement