Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Lipopolysaccharide infusion enhances dynamic cerebral autoregulation without affecting cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity in healthy volunteers

  • 1, 2, 3Email author,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 2 and
  • 1, 5
Critical Care201317:R238

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13062

  • Received: 10 May 2013
  • Accepted: 13 August 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Introduction

Sepsis may be associated with disturbances in cerebral oxygen transport and cerebral haemodynamic function, thus rendering the brain particularly susceptible to hypoxia. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of isocapnic hypoxia and hyperoxia on dynamic cerebral autoregulation in a human-experimental model of the systemic inflammatory response during the early stages of sepsis.

Methods

A total of ten healthy volunteers were exposed to acute isocapnic inspiratory hyperoxia (FIO2 = 40%) and hypoxia (FIO2 = 12%) before and after a 4-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion (2 ng kg-1). Middle cerebral artery blood follow velocity was assessed using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, and dynamic autoregulation was evaluated by transfer function analysis.

Results

Transfer function analysis revealed an increase in the phase difference between mean arterial blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in the low frequency range (0.07–0.20 Hz) after LPS (P<0.01). In contrast, there were no effects of either isocapnic hyperoxia or hypoxia on dynamic autoregulation, and the cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity to both hyperoxia and hypoxia was unaffected by LPS.

Conclusions

The observed increase in phase suggests that dynamic cerebral autoregulation is enhanced after LPS infusion and resistant to any effects of acute hypoxia; this may protect the brain from ischaemia and/or blood–brain barrier damage during the early stages of sepsis.

Keywords

  • Cerebral Blood Flow
  • Mean Arterial Blood Pressure
  • Cerebral Circulation
  • Hypoxic Intervention
  • PaCO2 Level

Introduction

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation functions to maintain cerebral oxygen delivery by dampening the effects of acute surges in cerebral perfusion pressure on cerebral blood flow (CBF) through cerebral arteriolar vasodilatation and vasoconstriction as mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreases and increases, respectively [1, 2]. It functions in concert with cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity (COVR), which maintains oxygen delivery by means of cerebral arteriolar vasoconstriction or vasodilatation following increases and decreases in PaO2, respectively, to optimise cerebral tissue oxygenation [3]. These homeostatic mechanisms are important to support the metabolic demands of neuronal activity and the need to protect brain tissue from the potentially damaging effects of hypo- and hyperperfusion [1, 2].

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation has previously been found to operate with a prolonged response time in critically ill patients with sepsis [47]. This may contribute to symptoms of encephalopathy as well as long-term cognitive dysfunction, both of which are commonly encountered in this patient group [8, 9], by exposing the brain to intermittent ischaemia and blood–brain barrier damage during acute decreases and increases in MAP, respectively. In contrast, dynamic cerebral autoregulation has been found to be improved after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration in healthy volunteers [4, 10], a human-experimental model of the systemic inflammatory response during early sepsis [11]. This discrepancy suggests that dynamic autoregulation is maintained during the early stages of sepsis but then becomes 'indolent’ during the clinical course of disease, in the sense that the magnitude of the cerebrovascular response to a given change in MAP is preserved, while the response time of the cerebrovasculature becomes progressively prolonged [4]. The changes in dynamic autoregulation may be related to PaCO2 levels, in that the hyperventilatory response induced by LPS infusion may improve dynamic autoregulation [10], while the prolonged response time of the cerebral circulation in patients is associated with higher PaCO2 levels [4, 7]. Furthermore, the fever response may contribute to the improvement in dynamic autoregulatory performance observed after LPS infusion, since passive hyperthermia has previously been shown to shorten the response time of the cerebral circulation [12, 13]. An additional contributory factor to the slower dynamic autoregulatory responses in patients may be the presence of hypoxia, which is common in sepsis [4], since even brief bouts (minutes) of inspiratory hypoxia may impair dynamic autoregulation [14]. Furthermore, the presence of systemic inflammation may render the cerebral circulation more susceptible to hypoxia by facilitating the formation of reactive oxygen-nitrogen species [15]. As of now it is unknown whether systemic inflammation enhances the effects of acute hypoxia on dynamic cerebral autoregulation.

In the present study, we examined the effects of acute inspiratory hyperoxia and hypoxia on dynamic cerebral autoregulation during an LPS-induced systemic inflammatory response in healthy volunteers. Since changes in PaCO2 induced by hypoxia and hyperoxia may in themselves affect cerebral autoregulation, an attempt was made to keep the volunteers isocapnic by continually monitoring and adjusting end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) during the cerebral autoregulatory assessments. We hypothesised that: 1) dynamic autoregulation would be enhanced after LPS during normoxia; 2) dynamic cerebral autoregulation would be impaired during acute hypoxia at baseline; and 3) the impact of hypoxia on dynamic autoregulation would be augmented after LPS.

Material and methods

The study was approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg Municipalities, Denmark (file number H-2-2010-04), and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [16].

Participants

Ten healthy non-sedentary male volunteers, 23 (mean) ± 2 (SD) years old, were included in the study after having provided oral and written informed consent. All volunteers had an unremarkable medical history, with no signs of infection within four weeks before the trial day, and none took any regular medication. Prior to inclusion, all volunteers underwent a thorough physical examination, a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained, and standard laboratory tests were performed. All tests were normal.

On the study day, volunteers reported to the ICU at 7:00 am following a 12- hour overnight fast. They were placed in bed and catheterised with an antecubital catheter (for LPS infusion), and an arterial line was inserted in the left radial artery following local anaesthesia (lidocaine, 20 mg.ml-1). The volunteers then rested for 45 minutes while remaining supine before measurements were started. Heart rate (via a three-lead ECG), invasive blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation (by pulse oximetry) were continuously monitored, and medically qualified personnel were present at all times. External stimuli were minimised during all measurements. Volunteers were allowed to drink tap water ad libitum during the study day. After completion of all interventions, volunteers were monitored until complete alleviation of symptoms and normalisation of all vital parameters, and they were discharged following a light meal and removal of catheters.

Lipopolysaccharide infusion

Volunteers underwent a four-hour continuous intravenous infusion of purified Escherichia coli LPS (infusion rate, 0.5 ng.kg-1. hour-1; Batch G2 B274, US Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD, USA). In this model, volunteer symptoms and plasma levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α reach maximal values at approximately one hour after cessation of the infusion [17]. Rectal temperature was measured at baseline, hourly during the LPS infusion, and at six hours, that is, two hours after cessation of the infusion. Volunteer symptoms were evaluated at these time points by means of a modified visual analogue scale, as previously described [4]. Briefly, six individual symptom scores, encompassing malaise, shivering, nausea, headache, myalgia and dizziness, were added together to yield a total symptom score with a minimal value of 6, implying no symptoms at all, and a maximal value of 60, indicating that all symptoms are the worst imaginable. Symptoms of encephalopathy were not systematically assessed during the study.

Inspiratory hyperoxia and hypoxia

Prior to (baseline) and immediately after (at four hours) LPS infusion, three interventions were conducted using a closed system (Ambu 'E’ valve) with a tight-fitting mask: 20 minutes of normoxia (21% O2; 79% N2), 20 minutes of inspiratory hyperoxia (40% O2; 60% N2), and 20 minutes of inspiratory hypoxia (12% O2; 88% N2). Normoxia was the first intervention both before and after LPS in all volunteers, and this was immediately followed by hyperoxia or hypoxia in a volunteer-blinded block-randomised fashion; hence, hyperoxia was conducted before hypoxia in five subjects and after hypoxia in the remaining five. The hyperoxic and hypoxic interventions were divided by a normoxic washout period of 20 minutes, so that the three interventions lasted for a total of approximately 80 minutes. The inspired gases were continually added to a 3-litre polychloroprene anaesthesia breathing bag (Nolato Medical, Torekov, Sweden) with approximately 30 ml water at room temperature for vaporisation; the breathing bag was connected to the face mask through a flexible low-resistance system, and the total instrumental dead space was less than 300 ml. To avoid the contaminating effects of hypocapnia-mediated cerebral vasoconstriction, all interventions were conducted in isocapnia by continuously monitoring PETCO2 using a capnograph (M3015A CO2 MMS Module, Philips Medical Systems, Böblingen, Germany) attached to the face mask, and adding CO2 to the inspired air ad hoc, aiming at a PETCO2 between 5.5 and 5.8 kPa.

Transcranial Doppler ultrasound

A 2 MHz pulsed transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) system (Ez-Dop and Doppler-Box, Compumedics DWL GmbH, Singen, Germany) was used to measure backscattered Doppler signals continuously for the estimation of unilateral linear middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv). Changes in MCAv were considered to reflect changes in CBF, assuming an unchanged calibre of the middle cerebral artery; TCD has previously been validated in this context during physiological changes in MAP and PaCO2[1820]. Following a standardised search technique [21], the Doppler probe was fixed over the left transtemporal window using an adjustable silicone headband (provided by Compumedics DWL GmbH, Singen, Germany) to maintain the optimal angle of insonation during measurements. The TCD was detached during the four-hour LPS infusion and reattached and fixed before the interventions after LPS infusion.

The arterial line was attached to a pressure transducer (Invasive Blood Pressure Module M1006B, Philips Medical Systems, Böblingen, Germany), positioned at the level of the right atrium for the monitoring and recording of beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure. The subject remained supine with slight head elevation at approximately 20° during all measurements. Invasive arterial blood pressure, TCD waveforms and respiratory rate were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an analogue-to-digital converter (PowerLab 16/30™, ADInstruments Ltd, Oxford, UK) and recorded in LabChart version 7 (ADInstruments Ltd, Oxford, UK) on an offline personal computer. The presented values for MAP, heart rate, MCAv and respiratory rate are the mean values recorded over the four minute period immediately preceding the given time point.

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation

Dynamic autoregulation was evaluated using transfer function analysis [22], which assesses the impact of spontaneous oscillations in MAP on MCAv. To ensure that steady state had been attained during the hyperoxic and hypoxic interventions, recordings of invasive arterial blood pressure and TCD waveforms from the last 10 minutes of the interventions were used for spectral analysis after re-sampling at 10 Hz. A 1,200-point Fourier transformation, with a 60 second overlap between sequential segments for Welch spectral estimation and multiplication by the Hanning window to minimise spectral leakage, was performed in MatLab version R2011a (MathWorks, Natick, MD, USA). Data were analysed in the very low (0.02 to 0.07 Hz), low (0.07 to 0.20 Hz) and high (0.20 to 0.30 Hz) frequency ranges. Transfer gain, normalised gain, MAP-to-MCAv phase difference and coherence were subsequently calculated [22, 23], and data from the low frequency range were specifically used as the basis for assessing dynamic autoregulatory performance, since contamination of the MAP fluctuations by respiration is minimal within this frequency range [22, 24]; to ensure valid transfer gain, normalised gain, and MAP-to-MCAv phase difference estimates, only values where the corresponding coherence was ≥0.4 were used [2]. Accordingly, a decrease in transfer gain, normalised gain, and/or an increased MAP-to-MCAv phase difference would be interpreted as evidence for enhanced dynamic autoregulation and vice versa[22, 23].

Cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity

The % change in MCAv per kPa change in PaO2 was used as an estimate of the COVR [3]. Due to the nonlinear relationship between PaO2 and CBF, COVR was calculated separately for hyperoxia and hypoxia. A FIO2 of 40% was chosen for the induction of hyperoxia, because this would expectedly increase PaO2 above 13.3 kPa, above which the relationship between PaO2 and CBF becomes asymptotic, so that further changes in CBF are minimal [3]. A FIO2 of 12% was chosen for the induction of hypoxia because this would expectedly decrease PaO2 to approximately 7.9 kPa, below which the relationship between PaO2 and CBF becomes hyperbolic with large changes in CBF upon relatively small changes in PaO2[3, 25]. The COVR was calculated using the average MCAv values obtained during the last four minutes of the normoxic, hyperoxic and hypoxic interventions.

Laboratory analyses

Blood samples for white blood cell counts were obtained from the arterial catheter at baseline, hourly during the LPS infusion, and two hours after cessation of the infusion (at six hours) and were determined by an automated analyser (Sysmex XE-2100, Sysmex Europe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany).

Blood samples for the determination of plasma TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations were obtained at baseline and after LPS, at the end of the normoxic, hyperoxic and hypoxic interventions, respectively. Plasma was obtained by centrifuging whole blood in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing tubes at 3,000 rpm at 4°C for 10 minutes and kept at -80°C until analysis. TNF-α and IL-6 were measured in duplicate by means of electrochemiluminescent detection on a multiplex immunoassay using a SECTOR Imager 2400 (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and mean concentrations were calculated. The interassay coefficient of variation at the high and low end of the standard curve was assessed by using two internal controls (human plasma) and was below 12% at a known concentration of 2.4 pg.ml-1 and below 8% at a known concentration of 10,000 pg.ml-1 for both cytokines.

Arterial blood gases were obtained from the arterial catheter at baseline, hourly during the LPS infusion, and at the end of the normoxic, hyperoxic and hypoxic interventions, both at baseline and after LPS. Arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), oxygen saturation (SaO2), PaCO2, pH, HCO3-, base excess and haemoglobin were subsequently determined on a blood gas analyser (ABL 725, Radiometer, Brønshøj, Denmark).

The arterial blood content of oxygen (CaO2) was calculated as
CaO 2 mmol L - 1 = SaO 2 fraction × haemoglobin mmol L - 1 + PaO 2 kPa × 0.01 mmol L - 1 kPa - 1

Statistics

A linear mixed model with a covariance structure fitted for non-equidistant data points was used to analyse the effects of LPS on white blood cell counts, symptom scores, as well as cardiovascular and respiratory parameters over time. If an overall effect was identified (LPS × time interaction), the estimated individual differences from baseline were evaluated using the Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Standard residual diagnostics were used for model control; all data showed variance homogeneity and normal distribution of residuals. Since the majority of cerebral haemodynamic data and cytokines did not follow a normal distribution, as evaluated by normality plots and Shapiro-Wilk’s test for normality, Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test was used for paired comparisons between normoxia, hyperoxia, and hypoxia before and after LPS, and P-values were adjusted according to Holm’s sequential Bonferroni correction. Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as median with the corresponding interquartile range. Statistical significance was attained at P<0.05, and all statistical analyses were performed by SAS statistical software version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Systemic inflammatory response

LPS infusion was associated with fever (Figure 1A) and increases in white blood cell count with neutrocytosis (Figure 1B-C), as well as increases in symptom scores. The individual symptoms and the total symptom score are outlined in an additional file [see Additional file 1]. This was accompanied by a progressive increase in heart rate and respiratory rate (both P<0.001); heart rate increased from 53 (51 to 56) to 93 (85 to 104) beats.min-1 while respiratory rate increased from 11 (9 to 13) to 19 (16 to 22) breaths.min-1, both peaking at four hours (both P<0.001 compared to baseline). The corresponding PaCO2 decreased during LPS infusion (P<0.001), from 5.7 (5.6 to 5.8) kPa at baseline to 4.8 (4.6 to 4.9) kPa at four hours (P<0.001), and pH subsequently increased (P<0.001) from 7.39 (7.38 to 7.44) at baseline to 7.44 (7.43 to 7.44) at four hours (P<0.05). MAP was 88 (84 to 90) mmHg at baseline and 87 (81 to 90) mmHg at four hours and was unaffected by LPS (P = 0.59).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Temperature and white blood cell response. A blood sample was obtained from a radial artery catheter at baseline and hourly during a four-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion, as well as two hours after cessation of the infusion, in healthy volunteers (n = 10). A: Temperature; B: White blood cell count (WBC); C: Neutrocyte count. Data are presented as median (black line) and interquartile range (dashed lines). LPS x time interaction, # P<0.001. Different from baseline, *** P<0.001.

Inspiratory hyperoxia and hypoxia

PaO2, SaO2 and CaO2 were affected to the same extent by inspiratory hyperoxia and hypoxia at baseline and after LPS (Table 1). At baseline, the respiratory rate was 11 (9 to 13) breaths . min-1 during hyperoxia and 12 (11 to 13) during hypoxia; after LPS, it was 13 (12 to 16) breaths.min-1 during hyperoxia, and 15 (13 to 20) during hypoxia with no differences between interventions. PETCO2 was kept constant during the interventions, and apart from a small decrease during inspiratory hypoxia after LPS, values of PETCO2 were similar at baseline and after LPS; although the corresponding PaCO2 levels were consistently lower after LPS, none of the subjects were hypocapnic (PaCO2 <4.5 kPa) during the interventions (Table 1).
Table 1

Arterial blood gas parameters and end-tidal CO 2 (P ET CO 2 )

 

Baseline

LPS

 

Normoxia

Hyperoxia

Hypoxia

Normoxia

Hyperoxia

Hypoxia

PaO2 (kPa)

13.2

28.5**

7.5**

11.6†

26.7**

7.1**

(12.8–14.3)

(27.4–29.1)

(6.0–8.2)

(11.0–13.1)

(26.4–27.0)

(6.6–7.3)

SaO2 (%)

98

100**

90**

98

100**

89**

(98–99)

(100–100)

(82–92)

(98–98)

(100–100)

(85–91)

CaO2 (mM)

8.4

8.7*

7.5**

8.3

8.7**

7.4**

(8.1–8.9)

(8.6–9.0)

(7.2–7.8)

(8.0–8.8)

(8.3–9.1)

(7.1–8.3)

PaCO2 (kPa)

5.7

5.6

5.7

5.0††

5.0††

4.8††

(5.6–5.8)

(5.2–6.0)

(5.5–5.8)

(5.0–5.1)

(4.8–5.0)

(4.7–5.1)

pH (units)

7.39

7.40

7.41*

7.43†

7.43

7.45*††

(7.38–7.41)

(7.40–7.42)

(7.39–7.42)

(7.42–7.44)

(7.41–7.45)

(7.42–7.47)

HCO3- (mM)

25.0

25.1

25.0

25.3

25.9

25.5

(24.4–26.6)

(23.9–26.4)

(24.5–26.2)

(24.8–26.0)

(24.7–26.7)

(24.2–26.0)

Base excess (mM)

0.9

1.0

1.6

1

1

0.9†

(0.2–2.7)

([-0.4]–2.4)

(0.7–2.7)

(0.2–2.3)

(0.1–2.1)

(0–2.4)

PETCO2 (kPa)

5.4

5.2

5.2

5.3

5.2

5.1*

 

(5.1–5.4)

(5.2–5.4)

(5.1–5.3)

(5.2–5.4)

(5.1–5.3)

(5.1–5.2)

A blood sample was obtained from the radial artery catheter during three interventions, normoxia (FIO2 = 21 %), hyperoxia (FIO2 = 40%) and hypoxia (FIO2 = 12%), at baseline, and after a four-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion in healthy volunteers (n = 10). CaO2: arterial oxygen content. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). Different from normoxia in the same condition (baseline/LPS), *P<0.05, **P<0.01. Different from the same intervention (normoxia/hyperoxia/hypoxia) at baseline, †P<0.01, ††P<0.001.

TNF-α and IL-6 levels were similar during normoxia, hyperoxia and hypoxia at baseline; they increased markedly after LPS, and both were higher during normoxia than during hyperoxia and hypoxia (Figure 2A-B). MAP was affected neither by hyperoxia nor by hypoxia before or after LPS (NS, data not shown).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Cytokine response. A blood sample was obtained from the radial artery catheter during three interventions, normoxia (FIO2 = 21%), hyperoxia (FIO2 = 40%) and hypoxia (FIO2 = 12%), at baseline, and after a four-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion in healthy volunteers (n = 10). A: Plasma TNF-α; B: Plasma IL-6. Data are presented as median (black line), interquartile range (IQR, box) and total range (whiskers). Different from normoxia in the same condition (baseline/LPS), ** P<0.01. Different from the same intervention (normoxia/hyperoxia/hypoxia) at baseline, †† P<0.001.

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation

Similar MCAv values were obtained during normoxia at baseline and after LPS (72 (67 to 76) at baseline versus 69 (64 to 77) cm.sec-1 after LPS; P = 0.97). In one subject, coherence in the low frequency range decreased to 0.28 during hypoxia at baseline; this subject was therefore excluded for the assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation. The MAP-to-MCAv phase difference increased after LPS, whereas transfer gain and normalised gain were similar to baseline values (Table 2). Transfer gain, normalised gain, and the MAP-to-MCAv phase difference were unaffected by hyperoxia and hypoxia, both before and after LPS (Table 2). Similar results were obtained when the data points, in which the respiratory rate was within the low frequency range, were omitted from the analysis. Results of the transfer function analysis in all 10 subjects in the very low, low and high frequency ranges are presented in an additional file [see Additional file 2].
Table 2

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation

 

Baseline

LPS

 

Normoxia

Hyperoxia

Hypoxia

Normoxia

Hyperoxia

Hypoxia

MAPsp (mmHg2)

4.6

4.6

8.7

3.9

7.8

9.0

(4.3–6.4)

(4.2–6.7)

(4.6–14.5)

(1.9–10.8)

(4.1–8.3)

(2.2–11.0)

MCAvsp (cm2 sec-2)

9.2

8.9

10.6

5.6

11.7

13.1

(5.6–10.1)

(6.0–11.7)

(7.6–19.4)

(2.4–15.3)

(8.3–14.1)

(5.7–23.4)

Gain (cm mmHg-1 sec-1)

1.26

1.34

1.28

1.20

1.24

1.29

(1.03–1.37)

(1.08–1.38)

(1.15–1.35)

(1.10–1.24)

(1.00–1.28)

(1.17–1.33)

Normalised gain (units)

1.49

1.30

1.43

1.40

1.24

1.32

(1.43–1.62)

(1.26–1.44)

(1.35–1.49)

(1.24–1.51)

(1.16–1.45)

(1.15–1.40)

Phase (radians)

0.58

0.70

0.47

0.82a

0.81a

0.91a

(0.47–0.73)

(0.48–0.78)

(0.45–0.62)

(0.76–0.84)

(0.78–1.03)

(0.76–1.01)

Coherence (units)

0.87

0.90

0.91

0.79

0.86

0.88

 

(0.86–0.88)

(0.86–0.93)

(0.89–0.93)

(0.71–0.85)

(0.83–0.86)

(0.69–0.94)

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation was tested during three interventions, normoxia (FIO2 = 21 %), hyperoxia (FIO2 = 40%) and hypoxia (FIO2 = 12%), at baseline, and after a four-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion in healthy volunteers (n = 9). Data are presented as median (interquartile range, IQR). Values for the spectral power of mean arterial blood pressure (MAPsp) and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAvsp), as well as transfer gain, the MAP-to-MCAv phase difference, and coherence are presented for the low frequency range (0.07 to 0.20 Hz). Only data for subjects with coherence ≥0.4 are presented. Different from the same intervention (normoxia/hyperoxia/hypoxia) at baseline, aP<0.01.

Cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity

At baseline, hyperoxia decreased MCAv from 74 (65 to 81) to 70 (59 to 73) cm.sec-1, while hypoxia increased MCAv from 67 (60 to 75) to 78 (68 to 88) cm.sec-1 (both P<0.01). After LPS, two subjects exhibited a paradoxical increase in MCAv during hyperoxia, but in the group as a whole, MCAv tended to decrease from 69 (64 to 73) to 63 (59 to 73) cm.sec-1 (P = 0.19). Hypoxia increased MCAv from 69 (61 to 77) to 78 (69 to 85) cm.sec-1 (P<0.01) after LPS.

There was no difference in COVR between baseline and LPS, neither to hyperoxia nor to hypoxia. At baseline, hyperoxia caused a 0.7 (0.3 to 1.2)% decrease in MCAv per kPa change in PaO2, whereas a 0.2 (0 to 0.6)% decrease in MCAv per kPa change in PaO2 was observed after LPS (baseline versus LPS, P = 0.50). Hypoxia caused a 1.1 (0.8 to 2.1)% increase in MCAv per kPa change in PaO2 at baseline; after LPS, hypoxia induced a 2.1 (1 to 4 to 4.5)% increase in MCAv per change in PaO2 (baseline versus LPS, P = 0.28). Similar findings were made when COVR calculations were based on CaO2 rather than PaO2 (data not shown).

Discussion

In the present study we found that LPS infusion was associated with enhanced dynamic cerebral autoregulation in healthy volunteers, as indicated by an increased MAP-to-MCAv phase difference in the low frequency range. There was no effect of hypoxia on dynamic autoregulation, neither before nor after LPS, and the COVR to both hyperoxia and hypoxia was maintained.

LPS infusion induced a systemic inflammatory response similar to that encountered during the very early stages of sepsis, with fever, increased heart rate, tachypnoea and hyperventilation, leukocytosis, as well as elevated TNF-α and IL-6 levels [4, 11]. We found that dynamic cerebral autoregulation was improved under these conditions, with unaffected transfer gain and normalised gain, but an increased MAP-to-MCAv phase difference. This implies that the magnitude of the cerebrovascular response to a given physiological change in MAP is similar, but that the cerebral circulation responds more rapidly to a given change.

The present findings are supported by two recent transfer function analysis-based studies that likewise found improved dynamic cerebral autoregulation after LPS administration [4, 10]. The findings from these studies do differ somewhat from the data at hand, since the improvement in dynamic cerebral autoregulation involved both decreased transfer gain and an increased MAP-to-MCAv phase difference. The volunteers in these former studies were, however, poikilocapnic. Although we attempted to keep the healthy volunteers isocapnic by continually monitoring and adjusting PETCO2 in the present study, LPS likewise induced a hyperventilatory response with lower PaCO2 levels after LPS than at baseline. This decrease in PaCO2 was, however, less pronounced than in a former study using the same four-hour LPS infusion [4]; hence, PaCO2 levels, transfer gain, and the MAP-to-MCAv phase differences were similar to the present study at baseline, but after LPS, PaCO2 levels decreased to 4.8 (4.6 to 5.0) kPa, and this was associated with lower transfer gain (0.87 (0.77 to 0.89) cm.mmHg-1.sec-1) and higher MAP-to-MCAv phase difference values (1.12 (1.10 to 1.31) radians) than observed in the present study. The potential impact of LPS-induced hyperventilation on the cerebral circulation was, therefore, likely dampened in the present study, and our findings may thus suggest that the changes in transfer gain and the MAP-to-MCAv phase difference observed in the former studies were facilitated by hypocapnia.

The increased MAP-to-MCAv phase difference, which remained even after alleviation of the PaCO2 decrease, may suggest that a relatively smaller change in PaCO2 is required to enhance the response time of the cerebral circulation (MAP-to-MCAv phase difference) than is required to improve its actual ability to dampen the impact of a given change in MAP on CBF (transfer gain and normalised gain). A possible additional contributory factor that may be of importance is the observed fever response. Accordingly, passive heating to core temperatures similar to those induced by LPS has been found to increase only the MAP-to-MCAv phase difference, whereas gain is unaffected [13]. The present findings thus support the notion that hyperventilation and fever may act in synergy to protect the cerebral circulation during the very early stages of sepsis [4].

We found no effects of either acute inspiratory hyperoxia or hypoxia on dynamic cerebral autoregulation at baseline or after LPS. It is well established that acute hyperoxia has no or minimal effects on dynamic autoregulation in healthy volunteers [14, 26], and, based on our data, this is also not the case during an LPS-induced systemic inflammatory response. With regard to hypoxia, our findings disagree somewhat with former studies. Although acute inspiratory hypoxia with an FIO2 of 12% to 15% and a duration of 5 to 15 minutes has previously been found to be associated with unaltered, impaired or even improved dynamic cerebral autoregulation in healthy volunteers [2628], these findings may have been biased by hypoxia-associated hypocapnia. Indeed, a recent study by Ogoh and co-workers [14] reported that dynamic cerebral autoregulation was improved after eight minutes of poikilocapnic hypoxia, whereas it was impaired after eight minutes of isocapnic hypoxia at a FIO2 of 14%, suggesting that the hyperventilatory response serves to protect the cerebral circulation during acute hypoxia. During more prolonged hypoxia (hours), dynamic cerebral autoregulation has nevertheless been found to be impaired, despite hypocapnia-mediated cerebral vasoconstriction [29]. Therefore, the present findings do not exclude the possibility that the marked hypoxaemia that is observed in critically ill patients with sepsis [4] adversely affects the cerebral circulation during the clinical course of sepsis.

The divergence between the findings relating to the effects of acute isocapnic hypoxia on dynamic autoregulation in the present study and in the study by Ogoh and co-workers [14] is likely related to methodological differences. The latter study used the thigh-cuff deflation technique and subsequent calculation of the rate of regulation for the assessment of dynamic autoregulation [14]. The discrepant findings may thus reflect that the ability of the hypoxic cerebral circulation to respond to an induced reduction in MAP, for example by thigh-cuff deflation, may differ from its ability to dampen the impact of the spontaneous fluctuations in MAP which is assessed by transfer function analysis. In fact, a disassociation between estimates of dynamic cerebral autoregulation upon spontaneous fluctuations and induced manipulations in MAP has been observed in several studies on humans [30, 31], which stresses that each approach has its limitations with no universally accepted 'gold standard’. It is possible that the small magnitude and inconsistency of spontaneous pressure oscillations associated with the transfer function analysis approach did not detect subtle imperfections in dynamic cerebral autoregulatory performance during hypoxia in the present study. This might have become apparent if the MAP input signal had been dynamically 'forced’ [31, 32]. Future studies may thus benefit from considering transfer function analysis of augmented sinusoidal MAP oscillations forced through various repeated manoeuvers. This, furthermore, has the potential to determine the brain’s differential ability to buffer changes in cerebral perfusion in response to both hyper- and hypotensive challenges, which is important given that hysteresis is a natural characteristic of dynamic autoregulatory responses [33].

LPS infusion was not associated with any changes in COVR to either hyperoxia or hypoxia. By continually monitoring and adjusting PETCO2, we successfully managed to maintain PaCO2 during the hyperoxic and hypoxic interventions similar to the corresponding normoxic levels at baseline and after LPS, respectively; therefore, our findings are not likely to be biased by the hypoxia-induced hyperventilation which causes hypocapnia-mediated cerebral vasoconstriction and, thus, counteracts hypoxic cerebral vasodilatation [3].

Apart from the limitations relating to the duration of hypoxia and the assessment of dynamic autoregulation, there are a number of methodical limitations relating to the assessment of CBF by TCD that also merit clarification. Firstly, TCD measures the velocity of red blood cells within the insonated vessel, in this instance the middle cerebral artery, and not blood flow as such; secondly, the spatial resolution of TCD-based estimates of cerebral haemodynamic parameters is limited. Changes in MCAv can only be considered reflective of changes in CBF if both the insonation angle and the diameter of the middle cerebral artery are constant. In the present study, the insonation angle was kept constant during the normoxic, hyperoxic and hypoxic interventions by fixing the TCD probe by means of a silicone headband; however, the probe was detached during the four-hour LPS infusion. Although the reported hyperoxia- and hypoxia-induced changes in MCAv are valid, the data at hand, therefore, do not allow for uncritical comparisons of the absolute MCAv values between baseline and LPS. Previous studies have reported a hypocapnia-associated decrease in CBF after LPS administration [10, 34] and although hypocapnia was to some extent alleviated in the present study, and the MCAv was not found to be different during normoxia at baseline and after LPS, it cannot be ruled out that a decrease in CBF may have taken place. Even though the diameter of the middle cerebral artery has been documented to be constant during physiological changes in PaCO2[18, 19] and up to 90 minutes at a FIO2 of 12% [35], the effects of hyperthermia in this context remain to be clarified. In any event, this is unlikely to influence the reported hyperoxia- and hypoxia- induced changes in MCAv, since the temperature was similar between the interventions at baseline and after LPS, respectively.

With regard to the spatial resolution of TCD, one must bear in mind that the middle cerebral artery delivers oxygenated blood to large regions of the brain, and any TCD-based estimate of cerebral haemodynamic parameters is, thus, to be considered reflective of global, rather than local, cerebrovascular function. It is well-known that there is a noteworthy dissimilarity in vasoreactivity to both oxygen and CO2 across the cerebrovasculature [21]; furthermore, by the use of a magnetic resonance imaging-based approach in healthy volunteers, it was recently demonstrated that dynamic cerebral autoregulatory performance is more efficient in white than in grey matter, and more efficient in the cortex than in the cerebellum [36]. Thus, cerebrovascular function in discrete areas of the brain may be affected differently by both changes in MAP, O2, CO2, hyperthermia and systemic inflammation, changes that may have been rendered undetected by the TCD-based approach used in the present study.

Conclusions

The present study lends no support to impaired dynamic autoregulation as a contributory factor to sepsis-associated encephalopathy, at least during the very early stages of sepsis as mimicked by use of a LPS infusion in a human-experimental model. Hence, dynamic cerebral autoregulation was improved after LPS and resistant to any adverse effects of acute hypoxia, while COVR to both hyperoxia and hypoxia was unaffected. Further studies on critically ill patients are required to clarify to what extent hypoxia, hyperventilation and the fever response affect dynamic autoregulation during the clinical course of sepsis.

Key messages

  • Dynamic cerebral autoregulation is improved in healthy volunteers after a four-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion, a human-experimental model of the very early stages of sepsis.

  • Isocapnic hypoxia had no effects on dynamic cerebral autoregulation either before or after LPS, and the cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity to both hyperoxia and hypoxia was found to be intact.

  • As the extent of hyperventilation was alleviated by monitoring and adjusting end-tidal CO2, the improvement in dynamic cerebral autoregulation was found to be less pronounced than observed during poikilocapnia in former studies.

  • Our findings suggest that hyperventilation and the fever response act in synergy to enhance dynamic cerebral autoregulation during the very early stages of sepsis. This may serve to protect the brain from ischaemia and/or blood-brain barrier damage during acute surges in blood pressure.

Abbreviations

CaO2: 

Arterial blood content of oxygen

CBF: 

Cerebral blood flow

COVR: 

Cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity

FIO2: 

Inspired fraction of O2

IL-6: 

Interleukin 6

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccharide

MAP: 

Mean arterial blood pressure

MAPsp: 

Spectral power of mean arterial blood pressure

MCAv: 

Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity

MCAvsp: 

Spectral power of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity

PETCO2: 

End-tidal CO2 tension

TCD: 

Transcranial Doppler ultrasound

TNF-α: 

Tumour necrosis factor α.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Ruth Rousing and Hanne Villumsen for their outstanding technical assistance.

The study was supported by The Foundation of Merchant Jakob Ehrenreich and Grete Ehrenreich, The Foundation of 1870, The Toyota Foundation, Christian Larsen and Judge Ella Larsen’s grant, The Classen Trust Jubilee Foundation, The P. Carl Petersen Foundation, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen. The study was further supported by the Danish Council for Independent Research – Medical Sciences, the Commission of the European Communities (Grant Agreement no. 223576 – MYOAGE). CIM is part of the UNIK Project: Food, Fitness & Pharma for Health and Disease, supported by the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation. CIM is a member of DD2 – the Danish Center for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes (the Danish Council for Strategic Research, grant no. 09–067009 and 09–075724).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism, Department of Infectious Diseases, section M7641, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, DK-2100, Denmark
(2)
Renal and Vascular Research Section, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
(3)
Intensive Care Unit 4131, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
(4)
Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Health, Science and Sport, University of Glamorgan, South Wales, CF374AT, UK
(5)
Neurointensive Care Unit 2093, Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

References

  1. Panerai RB: Complexity of the human cerebral circulation. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 2009, 367: 1319-1336. 10.1098/rsta.2008.0264View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. van Beek AH, Claassen JA, Rikkert MG, Jansen RW: Cerebral autoregulation: an overview of current concepts and methodology with special focus on the elderly. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008, 28: 1071-1085. 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.13View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Johnston AJ, Steiner LA, Gupta AK, Menon DK: Cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity and cerebral tissue oxygen reactivity. Br J Anaesth 2003, 90: 774-786. 10.1093/bja/aeg104View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg RM, Plovsing RR, Ronit A, Bailey DM, Holstein-Rathlou NH, Møller K: Disassociation of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulatory performance in healthy volunteers after lipopolysaccharide infusion and in patients with sepsis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2012, 303: R1127-R1135. 10.1152/ajpregu.00242.2012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pfister D, Siegemund M, Dell-Kuster S, Smielewski P, Rüegg S, Strebel SP, Marsch SC, Pargger H, Steiner LA: Cerebral perfusion in sepsis-associated delirium. Crit Care 2008, 12: R63. 10.1186/cc6891PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schramm P, Klein KU, Falkenberg L, Berres M, Closhen D, Werhahn KJ, David M, Werner C, Engelhard K: Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation in patients with severe sepsis and sepsis-associated delirium. Crit Care 2012, 16: R181. 10.1186/cc11665PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Steiner LA, Pfister D, Strebel SP, Radolovich D, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M: Near-infrared spectroscopy can monitor dynamic autoregulation in adults. Neurocrit Care 2009, 10: 122-128. 10.1007/s12028-008-9140-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebersoldt M, Sharshar T, Annane D: Sepsis-associated delirium. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33: 941-950. 10.1007/s00134-007-0622-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Iacobone E, Bailly-Salin J, Polito A, Friedman D, Stevens RD, Sharshar T: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy and its differential diagnosis. Crit Care Med 2009, 37: S331-S336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brassard P, Kim YS, van Lieshout J, Secher NH, Rosenmeier JB: Endotoxemia reduces cerebral perfusion but enhances dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation at reduced arterial carbon dioxide tension. Crit Care Med 2012, 40: 1873-1878. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182474ca7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Andreasen AS, Krabbe KS, Krogh-Madsen R, Taudorf S, Pedersen BK, Møller K: Human endotoxemia as a model of systemic inflammation. Curr Med Chem 2008, 15: 1697-1705. 10.2174/092986708784872393View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Doering TJ, Aaslid R, Steuernagel B, Brix J, Niederstadt C, Breull A, Schneider B, Fischer GC: Cerebral autoregulation during whole-body hypothermia and hyperthermia stimulus. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999, 78: 33-38. 10.1097/00002060-199901000-00009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Low DA, Wingo JE, Keller DM, Davis SL, Cui J, Zhang R, Crandall CG: Dynamic autoregulation during passive heat stress in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2009, 296: R1598-R1605. 10.1152/ajpregu.90900.2008PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ogoh S, Nakahara H, Ainslie PN, Miyamoto T: The effect of oxygen on dynamic cerebral autoregulation: critical role of hypocapnia. J Appl Physiol 2010, 108: 538-543. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01235.2009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Berg RM, Møller K, Bailey DM: Neuro-oxidative-nitrosative stress in sepsis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011, 31: 1532-1544. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.48PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. World Medical Association: World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2008.http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3 Available from (accessed 16 April 2013)Google Scholar
  17. Taudorf S, Krabbe KS, Berg RM, Pedersen BK, Møller K: Human models of low-grade inflammation: bolus versus continuous infusion of endotoxin. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2007, 14: 250-255. 10.1128/CVI.00380-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bishop CC, Powell S, Rutt D, Browse NL: Transcranial Doppler measurement of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity: a validation study. Stroke 1986, 17: 913-915. 10.1161/01.STR.17.5.913View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giller CA, Bowman G, Dyer H, Mootz L, Krippner W: Cerebral arterial diameters during changes in blood pressure and carbon dioxide during craniotomy. Neurosurgery 1993, 32: 737-741. 10.1227/00006123-199305000-00006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Newell DW, Aaslid R, Lam A, Mayberg TS, Winn HR: Comparison of flow and velocity during dynamic autoregulation testing in humans. Stroke 1994, 25: 793-797. 10.1161/01.STR.25.4.793View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Willie CK, Colino FL, Bailey DM, Tzeng YC, Binsted G, Jones LW, Haykowsky MJ, Bellapart J, Ogoh S, Smith KJ, Smirl JD, Day TA, Lucas SJ, Eller LK, Ainslie PN: Utility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the integrative assessment of cerebrovascular function. J Neurosci Methods 2011, 196: 221-237. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Giller CA, Levine BD: Transfer function analysis of dynamic autoregulation in humans. Am J Physiol 1998, 274: H233-H241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Panerai RB, Dawson SL, Potter JF: Linear and nonlinear analysis of human dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Am J Physiol 1999, 277: H1089-H1099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Diehl RR, Linden D, Lucke D, Berlit P: Phase relationship between cerebral blood flow velocity and blood pressure: a clinical test of autoregulation. Stroke 1995, 26: 1801-1804. 10.1161/01.STR.26.10.1801View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta AK, Menon DK, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Jones JG: Thresholds for hypoxic cerebral vasodilation in volunteers. Anesth Analg 1997, 85: 817-820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ainslie PN, Ogoh S, Burgess K, Celi L, McGrattan K, Peebles K, Murrell C, Subedi P, Burgess KR: Differential effects of acute hypoxia and high altitude on cerebral blood flow velocity and dynamic cerebral autoregulation: alterations with hyperoxia. J Appl Physiol 2008, 104: 490-498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Iwasaki K, Ogawa Y, Shibata S, Aoki K: Acute exposure to normobaric mild hypoxia alters dynamic relationships between blood pressure and cerebral blood flow at very low frequency. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007, 27: 776-784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Subudhi AW, Panerai RB, Roach RC: Acute hypoxia impairs dynamic cerebral autoregulation: results from two independent techniques. J Appl Physiol 2009, 107: 1165-1171. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00498.2009PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bailey DM, Evans KA, James PE, McEneny J, Young IS, Fall L, Gutowski M, Kewley E, McCord JM, Møller K, Ainslie PN: Altered free radical metabolism in acute mountain sickness: implications for dynamic cerebral autoregulation and blood–brain barrier function. J Physiol 2009, 587: 73-85. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.159855PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bailey DM, Jones DW, Sinnott A, Brugniaux JV, New KJ, Hodson D, Marley CJ, Smirl JD, Ogoh S, Ainslie PN: Impaired cerebral haemodynamic function associated with chronic traumatic brain injury in professional boxers. Clin Sci (Lond) 2013, 124: 177-189. 10.1042/CS20120259View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamner JW, Cohen MA, Mukai S, Lipsitz LA, Taylor JA: Spectral indices of human cerebral blood flow control: responses to augmented blood pressure oscillations. J Physiol 2004, 559: 965-973. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066969PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Katsogridakis E, Bush G, Fan L, Birch AA, Simpson DM, Allen R, Potter JF, Panerai RB: Detection of impaired cerebral autoregulation improves by increasing arterial blood pressure variability. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013, 33: 519-523. 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.191PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tzeng YC, Willie CK, Atkinson G, Lucas SJ, Wong A, Ainslie PN: Cerebrovascular regulation during transient hypotension and hypertension in humans. Hypertension 2010, 56: 268-273. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.152066View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Møller K, Strauss GI, Qvist J, Fonsmark L, Knudsen GM, Larsen FS, Krabbe KS, Skinhøj P, Pedersen BK: Cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during human endotoxemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002, 22: 1262-1270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson MH, Edsell ME, Davagnanam I, Hirani SP, Martin DS, Levett DZ, Thornton JS, Golay X, Strycharczuk L, Newman SP, Montgomery HE, Grocott MP, Imray CH, Caudwell Xtreme Everest Research Group: Cerebral artery dilatation maintains cerebral oxygenation at extreme altitude and in acute hypoxia–an ultrasound and MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011, 31: 2019-2029. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.81PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Horsfield MA, Jara JL, Saeed NP, Panerai RB, Robinson TG: Regional differences in dynamic cerebral autoregulation in the healthy brain assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS One 2013, 8: e62588. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062588PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Berg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement