Open Access

Hyperoxemia and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury

  • Rahul Raj1Email author,
  • Stepani Bendel2,
  • Matti Reinikainen3,
  • Riku Kivisaari1,
  • Jari Siironen1,
  • Maarit Lång2 and
  • Markus Skrifvars1, 4
Critical Care201317:R177

Received: 7 May 2013

Accepted: 6 August 2013

Published: 19 August 2013



The relationship between hyperoxemia and outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is controversial. We sought to investigate the independent relationship between hyperoxemia and long-term mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.


The Finnish Intensive Care Consortium database was screened for mechanically ventilated patients with a moderate-to-severe TBI. Patients were categorized, according to the highest measured alveolar-arterial O2 gradient or the lowest measured PaO2 value during the first 24 hours of ICU admission, to hypoxemia (<10.0 kPa), normoxemia (10.0 to 13.3 kPa) and hyperoxemia (>13.3 kPa). We adjusted for markers of illness severity to evaluate the independent relationship between hyperoxemia and 6-month mortality.


A total of 1,116 patients were included in the study, of which 16% (n = 174) were hypoxemic, 51% (n = 567) normoxemic and 33% (n = 375) hyperoxemic. The total 6-month mortality was 39% (n = 435). A significant association between hyperoxemia and a decreased risk of mortality was found in univariate analysis (P = 0.012). However, after adjusting for markers of illness severity in a multivariate logistic regression model hyperoxemia showed no independent relationship with 6-month mortality (hyperoxemia vs. normoxemia OR 0.88, 95% CI 0. 63 to 1.22, P = 0.43; hyperoxemia vs. hypoxemia OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.50, P = 0.90).


Hyperoxemia in the first 24 hours of ICU admission after a moderate-to-severe TBI is not predictive of 6-month mortality.


Arterial oxygen tension Neurocritical care Oxygenation Traumatic brain injury Hyperoxemia Intensive care Mortality Mechanical ventilation


Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among the young population[1, 2]. Hypoxemia has been shown to be detrimental after TBI[3, 4]. Accordingly, guidelines from the European Brain Injury Consortium (EBIC) recommend an arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) target of 13.3 kPa (100 mmHg)[5]. The Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines recommend that PaO2 values lower than 8.0 kPa (65 mmHg) should be avoided, but due to lack of strong evidence an upper limit of PaO2 has not been established.

Brain hypoxia (low brain tissue oxygen tension, PbtO2) is an independent predictor of poor outcome, regardless of intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and injury severity[6]. Lately, there has been growing evidence that patient outcome is improved after applying a PbtO2-targeted therapy[7, 8]. In PbtO2-targeted therapy, high inspired oxygen fraction in percent (FiO2) is frequently used to maintain adequate PbtO2[9, 10]. As a consequence of the high FiO2, PaO2 increases to supra-physiological levels, that is, hyperoxemia[11]. However, the relationship between hyperoxemia and outcome in patients with TBI is controversial[12, 13]. Some clinical studies have reported a significant relationship between hyperoxemia and an increased risk of death, whereas some studies have shown no such relationship or even increased survival for TBI patients with mild hyperoxemia[1416]. Accordingly, we performed a retrospective observational multicenter study using a large national database to determine the independent relationship between hyperoxemia during the first 24 h after ICU admission following TBI, and long-term mortality.

Materials and methods

Finnish Intensive Care Consortium database

The Finnish Intensive Care Consortium (FICC) database is a high quality multicenter database consisting of data from ICUs in 22 different hospitals[17]. The FICC was established in 1994 as a cooperative benchmarking project, the goal of which was to improve the quality of intensive care in Finland. Physiological data are stored by clinical information systems that automatically collect data from patient monitors, ventilators and laboratory systems. Data on comorbidities, type of admission, diagnosis, and outcome are entered manually by ICU staff into the electronic database. Patients admitted after TBI are coded as such. Data are then transferred to the central database, which is processed by Tieto Healthcare & Welfare Ltd. (Kuopio, Finland). Before integration to the central database, automatic filters and specially trained personnel validate the data.

Data collection, extraction and oxygen values

The ethical committee of the Northern Savonia hospital district approved the study in May 2011 and following that the FICC management committee granted us access to the database. Data were extracted for all patients entered into the FICC database between 2003 and 2012, who had had moderate-to-severe TBI (Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score 3 to 12) and had been admitted to a neurosurgical hospital (five out of twenty-two hospitals). Treatment standards in all included hospitals are according to the BTF cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)/ICP-directed guidelines[6]. Patients who had been re-admitted, were non-mechanically ventilated, or for whom arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) or long-term outcome data were missing were excluded. Only patients between the ages of 14 to 99 years were included to be able to properly compare the study population with the nested cohort.

The FICC database contains only one PaO2 value. The value is chosen according to acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II methodology: that is, the PaO2 value associated with the ABG (taken during the first 24 h of ICU admission) with the highest alveolar-arterial (A-a) gradient for patients receiving FiO2 ≥0.5 or the ABG associated with the lowest PaO2 value for patients receiving FiO2 <0.5 (PaO2). The following variables were extracted from the FICC database: diagnosis, type of admission, year of admission, APACHE II scores[18], therapeutic intervention scoring system 76 (TISS-76)[19], treatment restrictions, comorbidities, diagnosis, physiological parameters, laboratory parameters in the ICU, and in-hospital and 6-month mortality.

Statistical analysis

For all statistical analyses we used SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0, released 2011 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The χ2 test (two-tailed) was used for categorical univariate analysis. Continuous variables were analyzed for skewness and the appropriate statistical test used accordingly. All continuous variables were highly skewed, hence, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test was used. Data are presented as median values with IQR unless otherwise mentioned. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between variables. The variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to control for co-linearity between variables in multivariate analysis.

Patients were divided according to the collected PaO2 (highest alveolar-arterial O2 gradient or lowest PaO2 value). Arterial oxygen tension levels were defined a priori to analysis: hypoxemia was defined as <10.0 kPa, normoxemia as 10.0 to 13.3 kPa and hyperoxemia as >13.3 kPa[20]. The primary outcome was 6-month mortality and the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

As a marker of illness severity the APACHE II score was used. However, since PaO2 is included in the APACHE II model (and we sought to investigate the independent relationship between hyperoxemia and mortality) an adjusted APACHE II index of illness severity independent of PaO2 was calculated (AP2no-ox). Furthermore, age and the GCS have been shown to be very strong independent predictors of outcome in TBI, so we tested whether the performance of AP2no-ox increased when recalibrating the index using age and the GCS as separate variables[21]. The final AP2no-ox with the best performance contained only the GCS as a separate variable. The performance of the APACHE II score and the calculated APACHE II index (AP2no-ox) to predict outcome was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (R L 2).

A set of predefined potential confounding factors was included in a multivariate analysis using logistic regression to investigate the independent effect of hyperoxemia on outcome. The final multivariate model included: AP2no-ox, PaO2 groups, year of admission (before or after 2007), emergency operation, ICP monitoring, controlled hypothermia, and platelet count. Furthermore, the predicted probability of mortality was calculated using multivariable analysis. A locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (lowess) curve was used to show the underlying relationship between PaO2 and 6-month mortality. The R L 2 test was used to assess how predicted and observed mortality matched.

Nested cohort analysis

Because the FICC database only contained one PaO2 value, and data regarding TBI severity were limited, we studied an additional nested cohort of TBI patients to better understand the descriptive value of the PaO2 measured according to the APACHE II methodology. Furthermore, we wanted to control for co-linearity between TBI severity and PaO2. The nested cohort consisted of patients with a moderate-to-severe TBI treated in the ICU of a designated tertiary neurosurgical trauma center (Töölö Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland) between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010. Only patients mechanically ventilated during the first 24 h of ICU admission were included. TBI severity was measured using the IMPACT-TBI prognostic model. The International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trials (IMPACT)-TBI model predicts risk of 6-month mortality based on patient admission characteristics[21]. All ABG data during the mechanical ventilation period were collected and used to calculate a time-weighted average of PaO2 (TWA-O2). Furthermore, as in the main study population, the PaO2 value associated with the highest A-a gradient or lowest oxygen value was collected (nPaO2). To evaluate the descriptive value of PaO2 we tested for correlation between TWA-O2 and nPaO2. To control for the relationship between TBI severity and PaO2 correlation between TWA-O2, we tested the nPaO2 and the IMPACT score. Correlation between variables was tested using the Spearman correlation coefficient.


A total of 1,116 patients met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). Of these patients 16% (n = 174) were hypoxemic, 51% (n = 567) normoxemic and 33% (n = 375) hyperoxemic. Baseline characteristics and physiological parameters are presented in Table 1. The median age was 53 years (IQR 35 to 64). There were some significant differences between the PaO2 groups in baseline characteristics. Hyperoxemic patients were significantly younger than normoxemic and hypoxemic patients (P <0.020). Patients in the hypoxemic group had received a significantly higher median FiO2 than patients in the normoxemic and hyperoxemic groups (median FiO2 44%, 40%, 39%, P <0.001) but had a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio than normoxemic and hyperoxemic patients (median PaO2/FiO2 19, 31, and 48, respectively; P <0.001). Furthermore, it was noted that patients in the hypoxemic group had significantly lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) than normoxemic and hyperoxemic patients (median MAP 69, 105, and 106, respectively; P = 0.002).
Figure 1

Study population. TBI, traumatic brain injury; FICC, Finnish Intensive Care Consortium; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; ABG, arterial blood gas analysis.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population


All patients (n = 1,116)

Hypoxemia (n = 174)

Normoxemia (n = 375)

Hyperoxemia (n = 567)


Age, years

53 (35, 64)

53 (34, 63)

55 (41, 66)

52 (32, 64)


Year of admission


 2002 to 2007

461 (41)

83 (48)

179 (48)

199 (35)


 2008 to 2012

655 (59)

19 (52)

196 (52)

368 (65)


Emergency operation

576 (52)

87 (50)

187 (50)

302 (53)


Operative admission

632 (57)

82 (47)

218 (58)

332 (59)


Controlled hypothermia

84 (8)

5 (3)

25 (7)

54 (10)


ICP monitoring

507 (46)

72 (41)

150 (40)

285 (50)


Treatment restriction

206 (19)

33 (19)

68 (18)

105 (19)


Platelets (109)

168 (118, 225)

156 (99, 231)

153 (111, 220)

174 (123, 225)


Markers of injury severity


24 (19, 28)

27 (22, 32)

24 (19, 28)

23 (19, 27)


Glasgow Coma Scale


 3 to 5

657 (59)

118 (68)

221 (59)

318 (56)


 6 to 8

267 (24)

38 (22)

86 (23)

143 (25)


 9 to 12

192 (17)

18 (10)

68 (18)

106 (19)


TISS-76 total score

133 (69, 287)

116 (69, 284)

131 (70, 278)

138 (68, 314)


TISS-76 average score

33 (29, 38)

35 (29, 39)

32 (28, 37)

33 (29, 38)


ICU length of stay, days

3 (1, 7)

2 (1, 7)

3 (1, 7)

3 (1, 8)


Hospital length of stay, days

6 (3, 14)

7 (3, 15)

6 (2–11)

7 (3, 14)


Continuous variables are presented as median (IQR) and categorical variables as n (%); ICP, intracranial pressure; APACHE II, acute illness severity and chronic health evaluation II; TISS-76, therapeutic intervention scoring system 76.

Table 2

Unadjusted outcomes


All patients (n = 1116)

Hypoxemia (n = 174)

Normoxemia (n = 375)

Hyperoxemia (n = 567)


Mortality, number of patients (%)



201 (18)

42 (24)

61 (16)

98 (17)



313 (28)

64 (37)

105 (28)

144 (25)



435 (39)

83 (48)

151 (40)

201 (35)


Table 3

Adjusted outcomes by multivariable logistic regression model showing relationship between PaO 2 groups and outcome


Odds ratio (95% CI)



6-month mortality


Hypoxemia versus normoxemia

0.90 (0.57, 1.41)


Hyperoxemia versus normoxemia

0.88 (0.63, 1.22)


Hyperoxemia versus hypoxemia

0.97 (0.63, 1.50)



In-hospital mortality


Hypoxemia versus normoxemia

1.01 (0.63, 1.62)


Hyperoxemia versus normoxemia

0.94 (0.65, 1.36)


Hyperoxemia versus hypoxemia

0.93 (0.59, 1.47)


Multivariate analysis adjusted for acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) index independent of oxygenation (AP2no-ox), admission year (before or after 2007), emergency operation, intracranial pressure monitoring, controlled hypothermia and platelet count. PaO2 (arterial oxygen tension) groups: hypoxemia, <10.0 kPa; normoxemia, 10.0 to 13.3 kPa; hyperoxemia, >13.3 kPa. The multivariable model displayed excellent discrimination (area under the curve 0.82, 0.83) and calibration (R L 2 = 0.708, 0, 119) for predicting 6-month mortality and in-hospital mortality, respectively.

Some slight variations in GCS between the groups were noted (P = 0.047). Also, controlled hypothermia and ICP monitoring were more frequently done in the hyperoxemia group (P = 0.011 and 0.004, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in overall treatment according to the TISS-76 (P = 0.803), but hyperoxemic patients had a higher average daily TISS-76 score than normoxemic and hypoxemic patients (P = 0.012).

The median APACHE II score for the whole cohort was 24 (IQR 19 to 28). The score was significantly higher in the hypoxemic group compared to the hyperoxemic and normoxemic group (P <0.001). Median AP2no-ox was lowest in the hyperoxemia group (28.5, IQR 13.5 to 58.4) followed by the normoxemia group (35.5, IQR 15.1 to 58.4) and highest in the hypoxemia group (49.1, IQR 19.7 to 71.1) (P <0.001). The APACHE II score showed excellent performance for predicting 6-month mortality in our patient cohort, with an AUC of 0.80 and an RL2 of 0.10. The APACHE II index (AP2no-ox) also showed excellent performance for predicting 6-month mortality, with an AUC of 0.82 and an RL2 of 0.32. Patients excluded due to missing data on long-term outcome did not significantly differ in PaO2 (13.1 kPa, IQR 10.8 to 16.8) (P = 0.394), but they had a slightly lower APACHE II score (22, IQR 19 to 26) than the included patients (P = 0.001).

Nested cohort

A total of 298 patients were included in the nested cohort (Additional file1). An average of 6.3 ABG was collected for every patient in the nested cohort. The median TWA-O2 was 20.9 kPa (IQR 17.1 to 25.2) and the median nPaO2 was 18.4 kPa (IQR 13.7 to 24.9). The median IMPACT score was 38 (IQR 22 to 54). No statistical significant correlation between the IMPACT score and nPaO2 or TWA-O2 was found (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.027 (P = 0.638) and −0.19 (P = 0.741), respectively) (Additional file2). Hence, we showed that there was no co-linearity between TBI severity and PaO2. Furthermore, there was statistically significant correlation between TWA-O2 and nPaO2 (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.688, P <0.001) (Additional file3). Thus, we established that the PaO2 value chosen using the APACHE II methodology accurately describes the patients’ oxygenation state during the whole mechanical ventilation period and is not influenced by TBI severity.


Unadjusted outcomes are presented in Table 2. The overall total 6-month mortality was 39% (n = 435). Of the non-survivors, 46% (n = 201) died in the ICU and 72% died in hospital before they could be discharged. In univariate analysis, hyperoxemic patients had significantly lower 6-month and in-hospital mortality compared to normoxemic and hypoxemic patients (P = 0.012 and 0.014, respectively). However, after adjusting for confounding factors in a multivariate logistic regression model, hyperoxemia had no independent relationship with 6-month mortality compared to normoxemia and hypoxemia: for hyperoxemia versus normoxemia, odds ratio (OR) = 0.88, 95% CI 0.63, 1.22 (P = 0.429); for hyperoxemia versus hypoxemia, OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.63, 1.50 (P = 0.898) (Table 3). The same results were noted for in-hospital mortality. There was no significant co-linearity between variables in the final multivariate analysis (VIFmax = 1.13). The underlying relationship between predicted risk of death and PaO2 is shown with a lowess smoother curve in Figure 2. The mean predicted risk for 6-month mortality was 38.9% (SD 27.0) and for in-hospital mortality it was 27.7% (SD 25.0). There was significant variation between the groups in the predicted probability of death, it being highest in the hypoxemia group and lowest in the hyperoxemia groups (P <0.001) (Figures 3 and4). To further investigate the relationship between hyperoxemia and outcome, PaO2 values were divided by deciles. Hyperoxemic PaO2 deciles were compared to normoxemic deciles in a multivariate analysis adjusting for same variables as above. However, even after dividing PaO2 by deciles, no statistically significant association between hyperoxemia and outcome was noted (Figures 5).
Figure 2

Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (lowess) curve showing the relationship between arterial oxygen value (PaO 2 ) and predicted 6-month mortality. Predicted risk of death showed good performance in predicting actual mortality with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.869 and R L 2 of 0.422. A clear association between increased risk of death and low (approximately <11 kPa) PaO2 or values very high (approximately >42 kPa) PaO2 values was noted. The predicted probability of death is calculated using the following variables: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) index independent of oxygenation (AP2no-ox), admission year (before or after 2007), emergency operation, intracranial pressure monitoring, controlled hypothermia and platelet count.

Figure 3

Observed and mean predicted in-hospital mortality differences between arterial oxygen tension (PaO 2 ) groups. The difference in mean predicted risk of death was significantly different among the groups (P <0.001), it being highest in the hypoxemia group and lowest in the hyperoxemia group. Predicted risk of death matched observed mortality very well within the quartiles with R L 2 values between 0.097 and 0.746. The predicted probability of death was calculated using the following variables: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) index independent of oxygenation (AP2no-ox), admission year (before or after 2007), emergency operation, intracranial pressure monitoring, controlled hypothermia and platelet count.

Figure 4

Observed and mean predicted 6-month mortality differences between PaO 2 groups. The difference in mean predicted risk of death is significantly different among the groups (p < 0.001), being highest in the hypoxemia group and lowest in the hyperoxemia group. Predicted risk of death matched observed mortality very well within the quartiles with RL2 values between 0.519 and 0.603.

Figure 5

Observed and predicted 6-month mortality by deciles of arterial oxygen tension (PaO 2 ). PaO2 was divided by deciles. Predicted risk of death matched observed mortality very well within deciles with R L 2 values between 0.088 and 0.987. The predicted probability of death was calculated using the following variables: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) index independent on oxygenation (AP2no-ox), admission year (before or after 2007), emergency operation, intracranial pressure monitoring, controlled hypothermia and platelet count.


Key findings

We conducted a large multicenter retrospective observational study investigating the relationship between hyperoxemia in the first 24 h after ICU admission and long-term mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Initially, in univariate analysis a significant association between hyperoxemia and decreased risk of death was noted. However, after adjusting for illness severity in multivariate analysis, no association between hyperoxemia and outcome was noted. The results remained when dividing PaO2 by deciles. Thus, no consistently reproducible independent relationship between hyperoxemia and outcome was determined.

Comparison with other studies

The deleterious effect of hypoxemia in TBI patients is well known[3]. Acknowledge guidelines advocate PaO2 values between 8.0 and 13.3 kPa (60-100 mmHg)[5, 6, 20].

Normobaric hyperoxia therapy during ICU care is a commonly used treatment alternative providing a safe margin to hypoxemia[22, 23]. However, the use of hyperoxia (normobaric) is not without problems and experimental research has provided data indicating harmful effects of hyperoxia exposure due to increased free radical damage, activation of programmed cell death pathways and expression of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, ultimately leading to cell death and causing acute lung injury, with similar histopathological findings to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)[2426]. Previous studies have shown that approximately 20 to 30% of all patients with severe TBI develop acute lung injury (ALI)/ARDS, resulting in poorer long-term outcomes[27]. Suggested etiologies of ALI/ARDS in patients with TBI include the use of high tidal volume, high respiratory rate, aspiration, pneumonia, and neurogenic pulmonary edema[28]. Furthermore, normobaric hyperoxia therapy has been shown to cause cerebral vasoconstriction, reducing cerebral perfusion, which may potentially increase cerebral ischemia[29, 30]. However, experimental studies by Singhal et al. have suggested that the benefits of normobaric hyperoxia exposure outweigh the risks[31]. The exact mechanism of hyperoxia-induced lung injury remains incompletely understood and there is not enough evidence from clinical studies showing that normobaric hyperoxia treatment (that is, high FiO2) increases the risk of ALI independent of the underlying disease (for example, bacterial or viral infections, trauma, chronic lung injury, aspiration, or lung contusion)[25]. Despite the potentially harmful effects, normobaric hyperoxic therapy has been shown to be beneficial in treating low brain oxygen levels, together with ICP control and CPP maintenance[11, 32, 33]. When normobaric hyperoxia is applied it is aimed at keeping PbtO2 greater than 20 to 25 mmHg (2.7 to 3.3 kPa), which is 50% of the normal brain tissue oxygen levels[34]. Also, the increased oxygen availability with high FiO2 levels may lead to induction of cerebral aerobic metabolism, alleviating ischemic injury[35, 36].

In 2007 the BTF guidelines presented class III evidence in favor of a PbtO2-targeted therapy in combination with the traditional CPP/ICP-targeted therapy[7]. Newer studies have reinforced this by showing improved patient outcomes when using the combined PbtO2 therapy compared to using the traditional CPP/ICP therapy[37, 38]. In a review article by Nangunoori et al. the use of PbtO2-targeted therapy doubled the likelihood of a favorable neurological outcome in patients with TBI[8]. There are several treatment strategies for maintaining PbtO2, increasing FiO2 and augmenting CPP by ICP-lowering treatment, vasopressors and fluids being the most commonly used[9, 39]. However, in the presence of cerebral ischemia, aggressive attempts to maintain CPP with fluids and vasopressors should be avoided due to risk of ALI/ARDS[6, 40]. Thus, increasing FiO2 to achieve supra-physiological arterial oxygen tension levels (hyperoxemia) has a central role in treating a lowered PbtO2, especially in the presence of adequate ICP and CPP[37, 41]. Whether increasing oxygen in arterial blood to supra-physiological levels has a positive impact on cerebral metabolism and improves outcomes remains to be debated[10, 42].

Clinical studies investigating the relationship between hyperoxia therapy or hyperoxemia and outcome in TBI patients have come up with controversial results. Tolias et al. showed in a prospective non-randomized study that hyperoxia therapy significantly improved cerebral oxidative metabolism and decreased ICP. This was associated with better outcomes, supporting the use of hyperoxia therapy[32]. Davis et a l. showed a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with mild hyperoxemia (PaO2 15 to 65 kPa) on admission, but increased risk of death in patients with extreme hyperoxemia (>65 kPa). In a small, retrospective, single-center study including 193 severe TBI patients, Asher et al. showed improved survival for hyperoxemic patients whose PaO2 thresholds were between 33 and 65 kPa during the first 72 h of admission[43]. In a large, single-center, retrospective study including 1,547 patients, Brenner et al. showed a significant association between hyperoxemia (PaO2 >26.6 kPa) and poor short-term outcome after TBI. However, the study was not restricted to patients on mechanical ventilation, which may induce bias, because it is probable that patients not on mechanical ventilation are likely to have a less severe TBI and hyperoxemia is more likely with mechanical ventilation[44]. In this study we avoided this potential confounding factor by excluding all patients not on mechanical ventilation. Similar to the present study, Eastwood et al. found no association between early hyperoxemia in general ICU patients during the first hours of ICU stay, and in-hospital mortality[45]. This was further confirmed by Young et al. studying mechanically ventilated ischemic stroke[46]. Furthermore, studies investigating the relationship between hyperoxemia and outcome in cardiac arrest patients have also yielded controversial results[47, 48].

In the present study 6-month mortality was 39%, which is somewhat higher than previously described. The IMPACT study showed a 6-month mortality rate of 32%, and the Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) study showed a 29% death rate[21, 49]. However, one major factor that has to be considered is the difference in the age of the study populations, as age is a major prognostic factor in TBI patients[50]. The median age in our study was 53 years (IQR 35 to 64) compared to 30 years (IQR 21 to 45) and 32 years (IQR 28 to 47) in the IMPACT and CRASH studies, respectively[21, 49].

In this study we did not find any statistically significant reproducible association between hyperoxemia and 6-month mortality in TBI patients treated in the ICU. This could be a consequence of lack of power. However, our study suggests that hyperoxemia is safe and a viable therapy target when trying to avoid the detrimental effects of hypoxemia and subsequent brain hypoxia. Our analysis should be extended in future studies to include all oxygenation values during the first days of TBI treatment. Furthermore, further studies should aim to assess PbtO2 levels, as this has shown to improve outcome[37, 38, 41]. Currently, two highly anticipated studies are underway investigating the role of normobaric hyperoxia therapy (BRAINOXY) and the role of PbtO2 targeted therapy (BOOST 2) in patients with TBI in the ICU.

Strengths and limitations

Our study has several strengths. First, it includes 1,116 patients, making it one of the largest studies of its type conducted so far. Second, our data come from a large, multicenter high-quality database reflecting almost all ICUs in Finland[17]. Third, this is the first study of its kind using 6-month mortality as primary endpoint, which considerably strengthens the credibility of this study, as it has been shown that in-hospital mortality severely underestimates mortality in TBI patients[49]. We acknowledge some limitations with our study. Most importantly the only available oxygen value was the worst one, according to the APACHE II methodology, which carries the risk of not fully describing the patient’s oxygenation situation during the whole mechanical ventilation period. However, as we showed with the nested cohort analysis the PaO2 measured using the APACHE II methodology describes the mechanical ventilation period very well. Also, our statistical approach is partly limited to standard statistical methods comparing three levels of oxygenation, which, however, is a physiological process and not linear in nature. However, the lowess smoother analysis (Figure 2) does not assume any linearity in association. Second, we cannot control for oxygen exposure prior to ICU admission. Third, due to the retrospective nature of this study we used the APACHE II model to adjust for illness severity. However, this potential confounding factor was controlled for by performing the nested cohort analysis. Fourth, due to the retrospective nature of the study we were unable to assess long-term neurological outcome and were limited to using long-term mortality as the primary endpoint. Finally, because all institutions use the traditional CPP/ICP-directed therapy as standard TBI care we cannot comment on whether a PbtO2-targeted therapy would have improved the outcomes in our study.


Hyperoxemia in the first 24 h of ICU admission after a moderate-to-severe TBI was not independently associated with 6-month mortality.

Key messages

  • No consistent reproducible relationship between hyperoxemia and risk of death was established.

  • Targeting hyperoxemia seems to be a safe approach when trying to maintain adequate brain oxygenation.

  • Extreme hyperoxemia should be used with caution.


A-a gradient: 

Alveolar-arterial gradient


Arterial blood gas


Acute lung injury


Adjusted acute physiology and chronic health evaluation 2 independent of arterial oxygen tension


Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II


Acute respiratory distress syndrome


Area under the curve


Brain Trauma Foundation


Cerebral perfusion pressure


European Brain Injury Consortium


Finnish Intensive Care Consortium


Inspired oxygen fraction in percent


Glasgow coma scale


Intracranial pressure


International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trials in traumatic brain injury


Kilo Pascal


Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing


Mean arterial pressure


Arterial oxygen tension when the alveolar-arterial gradient is the highest or oxygen value the lowest for patients in the nested cohort


Odds ratio


Arterial oxygen tension


Brain tissue oxygen tension


Traumatic brain injury


Therapeutic intervention scoring system 76


Time-weighted average of arterial oxygen tension during mechanical ventilation


Variance inflation factor



The authors would like to thank the FICC and all the contributing departments. We would also like to thank Ville Pettilä (MD, PhD) for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital and Kuopio University
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, North Karelia Central Hospital
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital


  1. Jennett B: Epidemiology of head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1996, 60: 362-369. 10.1136/jnnp.60.4.362PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Maas AIR, Stocchetti N, Bullock R: Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 2008, 7: 728-741. 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70164-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. McHugh GS, Engel DC, Butcher I, Steyerberg EW, Lu J, Mushkudiani N, Hernández AV, Marmarou A, Maas AIR, Murray GD: Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24: 287-293. 10.1089/neu.2006.0031PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA: The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma 1993, 34: 216-222. 10.1097/00005373-199302000-00006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Maas AI, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Iannotti F, Karimi A, Lapierre F, Murray G, Ohman J, Persson L, Servadei F, Stocchetti N, Unterberg A: EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997, 139: 286-294. 10.1007/BF01808823View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Brain Trauma Foundation: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24: S1-S106. 10.1089/neu.2006.0209View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW, Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. X. Brain oxygen monitoring and thresholds. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24: S65-S70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nangunoori R, Maloney-Wilensky E, Stiefel M, Park S, Andrew Kofke W, Levine JM, Yang W, Le Roux PD: Brain tissue oxygen-based therapy and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic literature review. Neurocrit Care 2012, 17: 131-138. 10.1007/s12028-011-9621-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pascual JL, Georgoff P, Maloney-Wilensky E, Sims C, Sarani B, Stiefel MF, LeRoux PD, Schwab CW: Reduced brain tissue oxygen in traumatic brain injury: are most commonly used interventions successful? J Trauma 2011, 70: 535-546. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820b59dePubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Beynon C, Kiening KL, Orakcioglu B, Unterberg AW, Sakowitz OW: Brain tissue oxygen monitoring and hyperoxic treatment in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012, 29: 2109-2123. 10.1089/neu.2012.2365PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Reinert M, Barth A, Rothen HU, Schaller B, Takala J, Seiler RW: Effects of cerebral perfusion pressure and increased fraction of inspired oxygen on brain tissue oxygen, lactate and glucose in patients with severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003, 145: 341-349. Discussion 349–50Google Scholar
  12. Adamides AA, Winter CD, Lewis PM, Cooper DJ, Kossmann T, Rosenfeld JV: Current controversies in the management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. ANZ J Surg 2006, 76: 163-174. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03674.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fehlings MG, Baker A: Is there a role for hyperoxia in the management of severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg 2007, 106: 525. Discussion 525 10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.525PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Brenner M, Stein D, Hu P, Kufera J, Wooford M, Scalea T: Association Between Early Hyperoxia and Worse Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Surg 2012, 147: 1042-1046. 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1560PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumaria A, Tolias CM: Normobaric hyperoxia therapy for traumatic brain injury and stroke: a review. Br J Neurosurg 2009, 23: 576-584. 10.3109/02688690903050352PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis DP, Meade W, Sise MJ, Kennedy F, Simon F, Tominaga G, Steele J, Coimbra R: Both hypoxemia and extreme hyperoxemia may be detrimental in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2009, 26: 2217-2223. 10.1089/neu.2009.0940PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Reinikainen M, Mussalo P, Hovilehto S, Uusaro A, Varpula T, Kari A, Pettilä V, Finnish Intensive Care Consortium: Association of automated data collection and data completeness with outcomes of intensive care. A new customised model for outcome prediction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012, 56: 1114-1122. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02669.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985, 13: 818-829. 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Keene AR, Cullen DJ: Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983. Crit Care Med 1983, 11: 1-3. 10.1097/00003246-198301000-00001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Longmore JM, Wilkinson IB, Davidson EH: Oxford Handbook of Clinical Medicine. 8th edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Marmarou A, Roberts I, Habbema JDF, Maas AIR: Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 2008, 5: e165. Discussion e165 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenfeld JV, Maas AI, Bragge P, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Manley GT, Gruen RL: Early management of severe traumatic brain injury. Lancet 2012, 380: 1088-1098. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60864-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. de Graaff AE, Dongelmans DA, Binnekade JM, de Jonge E: Clinicians' response to hyperoxia in ventilated patients in a Dutch ICU depends on the level of FiO2. Intensive Care Med 2011, 37: 46-51. 10.1007/s00134-010-2025-zPubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kallet RH, Matthay MA: Hyperoxic acute lung injury. Respir Care 2013, 58: 123-141. 10.4187/respcare.01963PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Altemeier WA, Sinclair SE: Hyperoxia in the intensive care unit: why more is not always better. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007, 13: 73-78. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32801162cbPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sinclair SE, Altemeier WA, Matute-Bello G, Chi EY: Augmented lung injury due to interaction between hyperoxia and mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2004, 32: 2496-2501. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000148231.04642.8DPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Holland MC, Mackersie RC, Morabito D, Campbell AR, Kivett VA, Patel R, Erickson VR, Pittet J-F: The development of acute lung injury is associated with worse neurologic outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2003, 55: 106-111. 10.1097/01.TA.0000071620.27375.BEPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mascia L, Zavala E, Bosma K, Pasero D, Decaroli D, Andrews P, Isnardi D, Davi A, Arguis MJ, Berardino M, Ducati A, Brain IT group: High tidal volume is associated with the development of acute lung injury after severe brain injury: an international observational study. Crit Care Med 2007, 35: 1815-1820. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275269.77467.DFPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gole Y, Gargne O, Coulange M, Steinberg J-G, Bouhaddi M, Jammes Y, Regnard J, Boussuges A: Hyperoxia-induced alterations in cardiovascular function and autonomic control during return to normoxic breathing. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011, 111: 937-946. 10.1007/s00421-010-1711-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Floyd TF, Clark JM, Gelfand R, Detre JA, Ratcliffe S, Guvakov D, Lambertsen CJ, Eckenhoff RG: Independent cerebral vasoconstrictive effects of hyperoxia and accompanying arterial hypocapnia at 1 ATA. J Appl Physiol 2003, 95: 2453-2461.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Singhal AB, Wang X, Sumii T, Mori T, Lo EH: Effects of normobaric hyperoxia in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002, 22: 861-868.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Tolias CM, Reinert M, Seiler R, Gilman C, Scharf A, Bullock MR: Normobaric hyperoxia–induced improvement in cerebral metabolism and reduction in intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury: a prospective historical cohort-matched study. J Neurosurg 2004, 101: 435-444. 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0435PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Longhi L, Valeriani V, Rossi S, De Marchi M, Egidi M, Stocchetti N: Effects of hyperoxia on brain tissue oxygen tension in cerebral focal lesions. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2002, 81: 315-317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Doppenberg EM, Zauner A, Watson JC, Bullock R: Determination of the ischemic threshold for brain oxygen tension. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1998, 71: 166-169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Singhal AB, Benner T, Roccatagliata L, Koroshetz WJ, Schaefer PW, Lo EH, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, Sorensen AG: A pilot study of normobaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2005, 36: 797-802. 10.1161/01.STR.0000158914.66827.2ePubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarrafzadeh AS, Sakowitz OW, Callsen TA, Lanksch WR, Unterberg AW: Bedside microdialysis for early detection of cerebral hypoxia in traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2000, 9: e2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Narotam PK, Morrison JF, Nathoo N: Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury and major trauma: outcome analysis of a brain tissue oxygen-directed therapy. J Neurosurg 2009, 111: 672-682. 10.3171/2009.4.JNS081150PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Spiotta AM, Stiefel MF, Gracias VH, Garuffe AM, Kofke WA, Maloney-Wilensky E, Troxel AB, Levine JM, Le Roux PD: Brain tissue oxygen-directed management and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2010, 113: 571-580. 10.3171/2010.1.JNS09506PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bohman L-E, Heuer GG, Macyszyn L, Maloney-Wilensky E, Frangos S, Le Roux PD, Kofke A, Levine JM, Stiefel MF: Medical management of compromised brain oxygen in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2011, 14: 361-369. 10.1007/s12028-011-9526-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Contant CF, Valadka AB, Gopinath SP, Hannay HJ, Robertson CS: Adult respiratory distress syndrome: a complication of induced hypertension after severe head injury. J Neurosurg 2001, 95: 560-568. 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0560PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Stiefel MF, Spiotta A, Gracias VH, Garuffe AM, Guillamondegui O, Maloney-Wilensky E, Bloom S, Grady MS, LeRoux PD: Reduced mortality rate in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated with brain tissue oxygen monitoring. J Neurosurg 2005, 103: 805-811. 10.3171/jns.2005.103.5.0805PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Menzel M, Doppenberg EM, Zauner A, Soukup J, Reinert MM, Bullock R: Increased inspired oxygen concentration as a factor in improved brain tissue oxygenation and tissue lactate levels after severe human head injury. J Neurosurg 1999, 91: 1-10. 10.3171/jns.1999.91.1.0001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Asher SR, Curry P, Sharma D, Wang J, O'Keefe GE, Daniel-Johnson J, Vavilala MS: Survival advantage and PaO2 threshold in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2013, 25: 168-173. 10.1097/ANA.0b013e318283d350PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Nelskylä A, Parr MJ, Skrifvars MB: Prevalence and factors correlating with hyperoxia exposure following cardiac arrest – an observational single centre study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013, 21: 35. 10.1186/1757-7241-21-35PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Eastwood G, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Taori G, Pilcher D, Young P, Beasley R: Arterial oxygen tension and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2012, 38: 91-98. 10.1007/s00134-011-2419-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Young P, Beasley R, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Eastwood GM, Nichol A, Pilcher DV, Yunos NM, Egi M, Hart GK, Reade MC, Cooper DJ, Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group: The association between early arterial oxygenation and mortality in ventilated patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Crit Care Resusc 2012, 14: 14-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Angelos MG, Milcarek B, Hunter K, Parrillo JE, Trzeciak S, Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators: Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality. JAMA 2010, 303: 2165-2171. 10.1001/jama.2010.707PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Bellomo R, Bailey M, Eastwood GM, Nichol A, Pilcher D, Hart GK, Reade MC, Egi M, Cooper DJ, Study of Oxygen in Critical Care (SOCC) Group: Arterial hyperoxia and in-hospital mortality after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care 2011, 15: R90. 10.1186/cc10090PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Trial Collaborators MRCCRASH, Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, Poccock S, Roberts I, Shakur H, Steyerberg E, Yutthakasemsunt S: Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008, 336: 425-429.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Mushkudiani NA, Engel DC, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Lu J, Marmarou A, Slieker F, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Maas AIR: Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007, 24: 259-269. 10.1089/neu.2006.0028PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Raj et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.