Skip to main content

Fighting hospital sepsis

Introduction

Sepsis accounts for a very high mortality. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends a first 6 hours resuscitative bundle to improve patient outcome. Despite this, the bundle is poorly performed because of several organizational and cultural barriers. In recognition of this, we guess that an Educational and Organizational Intervention out of the ICUs could impact on septic patient outcome. In order to test our hypothesis we carried out, in 12 hospitals, a pre-intervention survey of the human and organizational resources (HOR) available in the management of septic patients. The aim is to seek any barrier potentially affecting correct Guidelines implementation.

Methods

Thirty-nine medical wards (MW) and 12 emergency departments (ED) were enrolled. Every unit was asked to fill in a pre-agreed HOR Checklist focused on the main requirements suggested by the Guidelines.

Results

Analysing the human resources available, we see that the bed-to-doctor ratio significantly (P < 0.01) increases from the day to the night shift: from 6 to 43 beds per doctor on the MW (median). Otherwise, the ED staff remains roughly the same: from 3.5 to 2.5 doctors on duty (median). The analysis of the organizational tools (Table 1) points out a low percentage of hospitals having: a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Protocol for sepsis management (8.3%), some Hospital Empirical Antibiotic Therapy Guidelines (0%) and an Infective Source Eradication Protocol (8.3%). Moreover, just 25% of hospitals involve an infectious diseases expert in every case of severe sepsis or septic shock.

Table 1 abstract p55

Conclusion

We guess that the poor availability of HOR showed by the hospitals could have a role in the Guidelines implementation and in the patient's outcome. Only a comparison between these results and data collected from a Clinical Checklist, focused on sepsis bundle compliance, and from a patient's outcome summary could confirm our hypothesis. This is the aim for our next part of the study.

References

  1. 1.

    Dellinger RP, et al.: Intensive Care Med. 2008, 34: 17-60. 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to AR Calini.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calini, A., Vesconi, S., Fumagalli, R. et al. Fighting hospital sepsis. Crit Care 17, P55 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11993

Download citation

Keywords

  • Septic Patient
  • Night Shift
  • Medical Ward
  • Guideline Implementation
  • Survive Sepsis Campaign