Equipment review: Pulmonary uptake and modes of administration of inhaled nitric oxide in mechanically-ventilated patients
Critical Care volume 2, Article number: 9 (1998)
Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is a selective pulmonary vasodilator which reduces pulmonary artery pressure and increases arterial oxygenation in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Despite these beneficial effects, inhaled NO has not yet been shown to improve outcome. During artificial ventilation, it can be administered in the downstream of the ventilator into the inspiratory limb of the ventilatory circuit, or can be mixed with oxygen and nitrogen in the upstream part of the system. Because of its simplicity and low cost, administration into the inspiratory limb is most commonly used in southern Europe, whereas in the United States and northern Europe, the system of administration into the upstream is more popular. Each of these systems has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Administration of inhaled NO into the upstream of the ventilator
The technique of administration of NO into the upstream of the ventilator was first developed in Scandinavia [1,2]. Mass-flow regulators are used to mix oxygen, air and NO before their entry into the low pressure inlet of the ventilator (NOMIUS system adapted to the Siemen's Servo 900 C ventilator). These flow meters are precise but expensive. They have a variability of < 1% from the set value. Each mass-flow regulator is controlled by a microprocessor in order to obtain the desired NO concentration at the point of entry into the ventilator. Most often, a system measuring the delivered NO concentration is associated.
When NO is administered into the upstream, the interior of the ventilator serves as a mixing chamber. As a consequence, inspired NO concentration is stable in any mode of ventilation [2,3]. In this system of administration, inspired NO concentration does not depend on the pattern of the flow of gas delivered by the ventilator, the tidal volume or the I/E ratio. There is no risk of overdose due to momentary interruption of ventilation during tracheal suctioning or acute reduction of minute ventilation when the ventilator is in partial-support mode [2,3]. Similarly, an accidental interruption of the power supply to the ventilator does not result in an overdose after the restoration of power. These are the principal reasons for which this mode of administration is recommended in North America an Scandinavia [3,4].
The main disadvantage of this mode of administration is the long contact time between NO and oxygen , resulting in the formation of nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Nitrogen dioxide is a toxic product causing bronchoconstriction at concentrations between 0.6 and 2 ppm, and alveolo-capillary membrane damage at concentrations > 2 ppm. The quantity of NO2 formed is proportional to the contact time between NO and O2, the inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) and the square of the concentration of NO . As high inspired oxygen fractions are used in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), administration of NO into the upstream of the ventilator can generate high concentrations of NO2. For this reason, it is necessary to incorporate a sodalime canister in the inspiratory circuit to eliminate NO2 before the inspired gas reaches the upper airways. The sodalime absorbs about 75% of the NO2 formed but less than 10% of the NO administered. In cases of prolonged administration of NO, it is necessary to change the sodalime at regular intervals. A period of 3 days seems to be the longest duration of utilization permissible. The different absorber systems commercially available are not equivalent in their capacity to eliminate NO2 while allowing the passage of NO [2,7,8]. It is necessary to evaluate each system before its clinical usage and to monitor the actual concentrations of NO delivered after the absorber . Another potential problem is that the passage of NO through a humidification chamber results in the dissolution of the gas in water with the formation of nitric acid (a phenomenon that does not occur with heat moisture exchangers) and in a decrease in the NO concentration actually delivered to the patient . However, in case of prolonged administration, oxidation of the metallic internal components of the ventilator by NO and NO2 does not appear to be a major risk with this kind of administration. The second disadvantage of this mode of administration is the fact that mass-flow regulators are expensive.
Administration of inhaled NO into the downstream of the ventilator
Administration of NO into the downstream of the ventilator is common practice in France and southern European countries like Spain and Italy. In this case, NO is administered into the proximal end of the inspiratory limb of the ventilator. Delivery directly into the trachea or at the level of the Y-piece of the ventilatory circuit should be avoided since high concentrations of NO and NO2 are generated at the point of delivery, with potential toxic effects on the tracheobronchial mucosa . Some plastics absorb NO, therefore, the use of teflon tubing to deliver NO from the cylinder to the point of entry into the ventilatory circuit is recommended. Such a tube should also be used for the monitoring system. It is also not advisable to administer NO at a humid site since it dissolves in water to form nitric acid . This is the reason why NO should be delivered just after the humidifier when one is present.
There are two different modalities for the administration of NO after the ventilator:
1. continuous administration by a calibrated nitrogen flow meter mounted directly on the outlet of the NO cylinder, and
2.sequential administration limited to the inspiratory phase, necessitating the use of specialized equipment that recognises the different phases.
These two systems are not comparable in their performance since only sequential administration coupled with controlled mechanical ventilation assures stable inspired NO concentrations [3,10]. Continuous administration, though simple and inexpensive, does not allow homogeneous mixing of NO with the inspired gas . These differences have been well evidenced by Imanaka et al using a test lung model . As illustrated by Fig 1, these authors recorded a peak NO concentration which was 10 times greater than the target concentration when using continuous administration during volume-controlled ventilation. In contrast, using sequential administration, inspired NO was always similar to the target concentration.
This method of administration consists of delivering a continuous flow of NO (regulated by a nitrogen flow meter) into the proximal end of the inspiratory limb of the ventilatory circuit. The flow is constant, varying between 50 and 2000 ml/min. The concentration in the cylinder can vary from 225-2000 ppm. Users of this system hypothesize that the NO mixes homogeneously with the inspired gases coming from the ventilator and apply the following formula to calculate the inspired concentration of NO:
[NOinsp] = VNO × V-1 × [NOcyl]
where [NOinsp] = inspired NO concentration; VNO = flow of NO delivered from the cylinder; V = minute ventilation coming from the ventilator, and [NOcyl] = NO concentration in the cylinder.
In practice, the desired concentration is obtained by adjusting the flow of NO as a function of the minute ventilation of the patient and the concentration of the cylinder.
Experimental evidence for the 'bolus effect'
During continuous administration of NO in volume-controlled ventilation, a constant flow of NO mixes with a discontinuous flow of gas coming from the ventilator. During the inspiratory phase, mixing of NO, oxygen and nitrogen is homogeneous since each flow is constant. During the expiratory phase, however, the flow from the ventilator stops while the flow of NO persists. As a result, NO accumulates in the proximal part of the inspiratory limb. During the inspiratory phase of the following respiratory cycle, this 'bolus' is 'flushed' towards the upper airways of the patient without having been homogeneously mixed with the tidal volume. Using fast-response chemiluminescence apparatus, this bolus effect can be detected, and is indicated by a marked fluctuation in NO concentrations within the inspiratory limb.
It is possible to demonstrate this phenomenon in a lung model by using a long inspiratory limb and sampling the gas from sites corresponding to different multiples of tidal volume . As shown in Fig 2, concentrations of NO measured from sampling sites corresponding to one and two tidal volumes are higher than those measured from sampling sites corresponding to half and one and a half tidal volumes, respectively. The explanation for this phenomenon is as follows. During inspiration, the bolus passes sampling sites at a high velocity and cannot be measured adequately by the chemiluminescence apparatus despite its fast response time. In contrast, during the expiratory phase - with a duration of 2.1 s - the NO bolus can be accurately detected by the chemiluminescence apparatus. As a consequence, the fluctuation of NO concentration at sites corresponding to one and two tidal volumes is much higher than a sampling sites corresponding to half and one and a half tidal volumes. In addition, fluctuation of NO concentration decreases at the most distal sampling sites suggesting homogenization of the bolus during the course of its movement down the inspiratory limb. The magnitude of the bolus effect is also inversely related to the NO concentration in the cylinder. Changing from a 22.5 ppm cylinder to a 900 ppm cylinder results in a 50-fold reduction in the volume of the bolus. Consequently, fluctuation of NO concentration is markedly attenuated in the inspiratory limb probably because the bolus is more rapidly homogenized in the tidal volume. One of the clinical implications of this observation is that utilization of cylinders with high NO concentrations minimizes the bolus effect in patients on inhaled NO therapy.
Distribution of NO concentrations
As shown in Fig 3, the concentration of NO fluctuates in the inspiratory limb. This fluctuation, which can be detected only by fast-response chemiluminescence apparatus results from the passage of the bolus past the sampling site for the inspired gas. As recently suggested, even fast-response chemiluminescence may underestimate rapid changes in NO concentrations . If the NO bolus is small and moves with a high velocity, chemiluminescence apparatus with a response time between 0.5 and 1.5 s may be unable to provide accurate measurements of the true peak NO concentration. By using CO2 as a tracer gas and infrared capnography with a response time of 350 ms, Stenqvist et al demonstrated that fast-response chemiluminescence (response time of 1.5 s) underestimates true peak NO concentrations when sampling at the Y piece during the inspiratory phase . If this fluctuation is measured at different sites in the inspiratory limb, the peak concentration and its phase in relation to the respiratory cycle vary significantly. As previously mentioned, this is because the phase and the peak of the fluctuation are influenced by the progressive mixing of the bolus with the inspired gas, and depend on the location of the sampling site in relation to the position of the bolus at the end of inspiration. As a result of the bolus, peak concentrations of NO are created within the inspiratory circuit which can generate high levels of NO2 . It is likely that for the same mean intratracheal NO concentration, continuous administration generates higher NO2 levels than sequential administration where the inspired NO concentrations are stable.
As shown in Fig 4, the classical formula does not allow a precise prediction of inspired NO concentrations administered to the patient. The formula underestimates the inspired concentrations delivered to the patient, thereby increasing the risk of overdose. This unpredictability of the dose received by the patient means that continuous administration can be utilized only if fast-response chemiluminescence apparatus is available for monitoring the NO concentrations. If such equipment is available, it is possible to measure the actual tracheal NO concentration during the inspiratory phase . If slow-response chemiluminescence apparatus is used, only mean tracheal concentration can be measured, which underestimates the actual inspired NO concentration delivered to the patient by about 50%.
The objective of sequential administration is to limit the administration of NO to the inspiratory phase so that the bolus effect is avoided. To obtain stable and reproducible concentrations of NO in the inspiratory limb, it is necessary that the gas flows from the ventilator and the NO cylinder have the same pattern during inspiration. During sequential administration in controlled ventilatory mode with a constant inspiratory flow, a continuous flow of NO is administered only during inspiration. As shown in Fig 5, NO concentrations in the inspiratory limb are fairly stable during sequential administration both in the lung model and in patients. Since a constant inspiratory flow is delivered from both the NO cylinder and the ventilator, there is a homogenous mixing of NO with the tidal volume.
At the tracheal level, NO concentration remains constant in the lung model, whereas it fluctuates in patients . Identical ventilatory and NO equipment was used in the lung model and in the patients, therefore, it can be assumed that the observed differences in tracheal NO concentrations are related to the differences in the distribution of volume or pulmonary uptake of NO.
The Opti-NO - advantages and disadvantages
The Opti-NO (Taema, Anthony, France) is a system designed for sequential administration of NO into the downstream of the ventilator . It comprises one circuit for the detection of inspiration and another for the administration of NO. The detection circuit senses the pressure increase in the inspiratory limb during inspiration and opens a solenoid valve, allowing the administration of NO more distally into the limb. The flow of NO delivered is constant throughout the length of the inspiratory phase. As shown in Fig 6, the Opti-NO delivers stable and reproducible concentrations as predicted by the formula since NO and oxygen are mixed at constant flow rates during the same period of time. To attain a similar concentration, NO flow requirement is lower during sequential mode compared to continuous mode. The Opti-NO allows a reduction in the cost of inhaled NO therapy.
However, this prototype device has some limitations. Although in sequential mode it is capable of delivering steady inspired concentrations during controlled mechanical ventilation with constant ventilatory settings, it is not capable of maintaining a stable inspiratory NO concentration in the face of decelerating inspiratory flow, changing tidal volumes and I/E ratios such as occurs during pressure support ventilation, intermittent mandatory ventilation, airway pressure release ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation . Its use in pressure-support ventilation, characterized by a decelerating inspiratory flow, results in a non-homogenous mixing of NO during the inspiratory phase and a significant fluctuation of inspiratory NO concentration. As shown in Fig 7, any change in the patient's inspiratory drive resulting in variations in tidal volume, inspiratory flow and duration induced fluctuation in inspiratory NO concentrations since the NO flow delivered by the Opti-NO remained constant. Therefore, the sequential mode provided by the Opti-NO can be used only in association with controlled and assisted-controlled mechanical ventilation with constant inspiratory flow, but not with pressure-controlled modes of ventilation. Furthermore, in patients on controlled ventilation, any change in ventilatory settings requires a corresponding change in Opti-NO settings in order to maintain a constant inspiratory NO concentration. This can be achieved using the slide-rule provided with the Opti-NO which indicates the inspiratory NO concentration predicted from the classical formula.
From the above comments, it follows that an ideal system for delivering NO into the downstream of the ventilator should have the following characteristics:
1. it should be a sequential system delivering NO only during the inspiratory phase of the ventilator with the flow of NO synchronized with the flow signal of the ventilator, and
2. the flow of NO should be regulated by a proportional valve with a fast response time which, at any given setting, maintains a constant ratio between the flow of NO and ventilatory gas.
Such a set-up, which remains to be manufactured, would ensure steady and predictable inspired NO concentrations and would represent an alternative to the present systems of administration into the upstream of the ventilator. It would also offer the advantage of not generating high concentrations of NO2 and obviate the need for sodalime.
Factors influencing the pulmonary uptake of inhaled NO in ARDS
The diffusion coefficient of NO for the alveolo-capillary membrane is 3-5 times higher than that of carbon monoxide . Paradoxically, experimental evidence demonstrates that in isolated animal lungs perfused with Ringer's lactate, the uptake of NO is only 10% . Such a low pulmonary uptake, despite a high diffusion coefficient, results from its poor solubility in water. When the isolated lung is perfused with blood instead of Ringer's lactate, more than 90% of the inhaled NO is taken up . The difference between the two experimental models lies in the presence of circulating hemoglobin in the lungs perfused with blood. Because of the high affinity of NO for the heme moiety of hemoglobin, blood plays a key role in the clearance of NO as it crosses the alveolo-capillary membrane.
From these experimental data it can be theoretically assumed that the factors which influence pulmonary uptake of NO are:
alveolar surface available for gas exchange;
perfusion of this alveolar surface, and
quantity of circulating hemoglobin.
As shown in Fig 5, when a sequential system of administration such as the Opti-NO is used in combination with controlled ventilation at a constant inspiratory flow, NO concentrations are stable in the inspiratory limb, whereas they fluctuate in the trachea. This fluctuation, which is not seen in the lung model, reflects the pulmonary uptake of NO. As shown in Figs 8 and 9, the percentage fluctuation of tracheal NO concentration (the difference between the inspired and expired NO concentrations divided by the inspired concentration) is inversely proportional to the alveolar dead space and directly proportional to the volume of normally aerated pulmonary parenchyma in ARDS . This is due to the fact that only the perfused part of the ventilated lung parenchyma takes part in the pulmonary uptake of NO . It follows that the fluctuation of tracheal NO concentration can serve as an index of the extent of alveolar disease as well as the severity of pulmonary hypoperfusion. Continuous monitoring of the fluctuation of tracheal NO concentrations in a given patient could thus be a reliable 'marker' of pulmonary function during the course of ARDS .
Nitric oxide is a potentially toxic gas. In humans, the plateau concentration to obtain maximal effects on pulmonary circulation and arterial oxygenation rarely exceeds 5 ppm [12, 17,18,19,20]. In 90% of adult cases, maximal effect is obtained with inspired concentrations between 3 and 5 ppm. Concentrations of NO >10 ppm in 100% oxygen result in toxic levels of NO2 . Since peak concentrations well above 10 ppm occur during continuous administration, it is recommended to use either sequential administration or to deliver NO before the ventilator [13,21]. Despite the low risk of overdose with these systems, an accidental increase in the inspired NO and NO2 concentrations must be detected, justifying the use of ventilator monitoring as an indispensable complement to the administration of NO.
Which type of monitor?
Systems with a response time of >10 s are not suitable for monitoring ventilatory fluctuations of NO concentrations [3,12]. Electrochemical monitors and the first generations [3,12]. Electrochemical monitors and the first generation chemiluminescence monitors such as the NOX 2000 (Ecophysics, Aix-en-Provence, France) are examples of slow-response monitors. They can be used during sequential administration to monitor NO concentrations in the inspiratory limb since it is stable . During continuous administration they do not permit measurement of the fluctuations in concentration in the inspiratory limb or in the trachea and hence should not be used in this setting. Electrochemical monitors are less expensive than chemiluminescence systems and with regular calibration, their precision is good (within 1 ppm) .
An accurate assessment of the mixing of NO in the different parts of the ventilatory circuit requires fast-response chemiluminescence apparatus [3,23]. Only second generation chemiluminescence equipment, specifically designed for medical usage, have a response time sufficiently rapid to permit measurement of inspired and expired tracheal NO concentrations . It is necessary to differentiate the response time of the apparatus from the transit time for the gas to move from the sampling site to the measuring chamber. As an example, NOX 4000 (Sérès, Aix-en-Provence, France) has a response time of 735 ms. When the equipment aspirates the gas sample at a flow rate of 1 l/min, the transit time is 2.4 s. The NO signal is then displaced by 2.4 s in relation to the flow signal (Fig 5). A display of tracheal NO concentration on the monitor screen is available on the latest chemiluminescence apparatus (EVA 4000, Sérès, Aix-en-Provence, France) giving the possibility of continuously monitoring the fluctuations in tracheal NO concentration as an index of 'pulmonary function' during the course of ARDS .
In 1998, inhaled NO should be administered in such a way that stable and predictable concentrations in the inspiratory limb are obtained. This can be performed by administering NO either in the upstream of the ventilator or directly into the proximal end of the inspiratory circuit using a sequential system. In the former case, NO concentrations will remain constant in any ventilatory setting whereas in the latter, any change in ventilatory parameter will impose corresponding changes in the NO flow. In the future, this drawback will be corrected by the use of fast-response time valves, administering NO with a flow perfectly proportional to the one delivered by the ventilator. Although constant NO concentrations are obtained in the inspiratory limb in both modes of administration, fluctuations in NO concentration are observed at the tracheal site. This fluctuation is due to the uptake of NO by the lung and is directly correlated to the volume of normally aerated lung and inversely proportional to the alveolar deadspace. It can, therefore, be considered as an index of ventilatory perfusion ratio mismatch, and can be continuously monitored in ARDS. In contrast, the continuous delivery of NO in the inspiratory limb leads to unpredictable and fluctuating concentrations of NO and must be considered as an unsafe mode of administration, unless fast-response chemiluminescence apparatus is used for monitoring.
Stenqvist O, Kjelltoft B, Lundin S: Evaluation of a new system for ventilatory administration of nitric oxide. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993, 37: 687-691.
Westfelt U, Lundin S, Stenqvist O: Safety aspects of delivery and monitoring of nitric oxide during mechanical ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996, 40: 302-310.
Imanaka H, Hess D, Kirmse M, et al.: Inaccuracies of nitric oxide delivery systems during adult mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 1997, 86: 676-688. 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00021
Wessel DL, Adatia I, Thompson JE, Hickey PR: Delivery and monitoring of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Crit Care Med 1994, 22: 930-938.
Nishimura M, Hess D, Kacmarek RM, Ritz R, Hurford WE: Nitrogen dioxide production during mechanical ventilation with nitric oxide in adults. Effects of ventilator internal volume, air versus nitrogen dilution, minute ventilation and inspired oxygen fraction. Anesthesiology 1995, 82: 1246-1254. 10.1097/00000542-199505000-00020
Glasson WA, Tuesday CS: The atmospheric thermal oxidation of nitric oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1963, 85: 2901-2904.
Pickett JA, Moors AH, Latimer RD, Mahmood N, Ghosh S: The role of soda lime during the administration of inhaled nitric oxide. Br J Anaesth 1994, 72: 683-685.
Gilly H, Krebs C, Nowotny T: Reduction of NO 2 by a NO 2 -selective scavenger. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996, 40 (suppl 109): 83-84.
Ishibe T, Sato T, Hayashi T, Kato N, Hata T: Absorption of nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide by soda lime. Br J Anaesth 1995, 75: 330-333.
Mourgeon E, Gallart L, Umamaheswara Rao GS, et al.: Distribution of inhaled nitric oxide during sequential and continuous modes of administration into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator. Intensive Care Med 1997, 23: 849-858. 10.1007/s001340050421
Stenqvist O, Fredholm M, Mareels K, Foubert L, Lundin S: Mixing conditions during nitric oxide administration evaluated with fast-response chemiluminescence and capnography. Br J Anaesth 1996, 76 (suppl 2): A364-.
Lu O, Mourgeon E, Law-Koune JD, et al.: Dose-response of inhaled NO with and without intravenous almitrine in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 1995, 83: 929-943. 10.1097/00000542-199511000-00005
Umamaheswara Rao GS, Gallart L, Law-Koune J-D, et al.: Factors influencing the uptake of inhaled nitric oxide in patients on mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 1997, 87: 823-834. 10.1097/00000542-199710000-00016
Borland CDR, Higenbottom TW: A simultaneous single breath measurement of pulmonary diffusing capacity with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. Eur Respir J 1989, 2: 56-63.
Yoshida K, Kasama K, Kitabatake M, Wakabayashi K, Imai M: Changing of nitric oxide in the airway: experiment with model-airway and perfused lung. Rep Environ Sci Mie Univ 1981, 6: 57-61.
Yoshida K, Kasama K: Biotransformation of nitric oxide. Environ Health Perspect 1987, 73: 201-206.
Puybasset L, Rouby JJ, Mourgeon E, et al.: Inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory failure: dose-response curves. Intensive Care Med 1994, 20: 319-327.
Mercer R, Costa D, Crapo J: Effects of prolonged exposure to low doses of nitric oxide or nitrogen dioxide on the alveolar septa of the adult rat. Lab Invest 1995, 73: 20-28.
Lowson SM, Rich G, McArdle PA, Jaidev J, Morris GN: The response to varying concentrations of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesth Analg 1996, 82: 574-581.
Mourgeon E, Puybasset L, Law-Koune J-D, et al.: Inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome with and without septic shock: a dose-response-study. Critical Care 1997, 1: 25-39. 10.1186/cc4
Krebs C, Escuyer M, Urak G, Zimpfer M, Germann P: Technological basis for NO application and environmental security. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996, 40 (suppl 109): 84-87.
Moutafis M, Hatahet Z, Castelain MH, Renaudin MH, Monnot A, Fischler M: Validation of a simple method assessing nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide concentrations. Intensive Care Med 1995, 21: 537-541.
Grove ER, Beale R, Smithies M, Bihari D: Nitric oxide and ARDS. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994, 22: 312-313.
About this article
Cite this article
Puybasset, L., Rouby, JJ. Equipment review: Pulmonary uptake and modes of administration of inhaled nitric oxide in mechanically-ventilated patients. Crit Care 2, 9 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc118
- Nitric Oxide
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Control Mechanical Ventilation
- Sequential Administration
- Ventilatory Circuit