Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Early diagnosis of candidemia in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a prospective comparison of (1→3)-β-D-glucan assay, Candida score, and colonization index

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 2
Critical Care201115:R249

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10507

  • Received: 20 July 2011
  • Accepted: 22 October 2011
  • Published:

Abstract

Introduction

The culture-independent serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BG) detection test may allow early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease, but its clinical usefulness needs to be firmly established. A prospective single-center observational study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of BG assay, Candida score (CS), and colonization index in intensive care unit (ICU) patients at risk for Candida sepsis.

Methods

Of 377 patients, consecutively admitted to ICU for sepsis, 95 patients having an ICU stay of more than five days were studied. Blood specimens for fungal culture and BG measurement were obtained at the onset of clinical sepsis. For CS and colonization index calculations, surveillance cultures for Candida growth, and/or clinical data were recorded.

Results

Sixteen (16.8%) patients were diagnosed with proven invasive fungal infection, 14 with candidiasis (13 candidemia and 1 mediastinitis) and 2 with pulmonary aspergillosis or fusariosis. Of 14 invasive Candida-infection patients, 13 had a serum sample positive for BG, 10 had a CS value ≥3, and 7 a colonization index ≥0.5. In the 12 candidemic patients, a positive BG result was obtained 24 to 72 hrs before a culture-documented diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. The positive and negative predictive values for the BG assay were higher than those of CS and colonization index (72.2% versus 57.1% and 27.3%; and 98.7% versus 97.2% and 91.7%, respectively).

Conclusions

A single-point BG assay based on a blood sample drawn at the sepsis onset, alone or in combination withCS, may guide the decision to start antifungal therapy early in patients at risk for Candida infection.

Keywords

  • glucan
  • Candida score
  • colonization index
  • invasive candidiasis
  • diagnosis

Introduction

Invasive candidiasis (IC) in non-neutropenic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) is a serious problem [13] and, of particular concern, associated with high mortality [4], especially when prompt and adequate antifungal treatment is not administered [58]. Furthermore, outcome is dependent on the causative Candida species and management of the primary focus of infection [9, 10], and continues to be suboptimal [11].

Early identification of ICU patients with signs of sepsis at high risk of IC is challenging due to the complexity of the patients' underlying conditions and low yield of fungal cultures [12]. However, the timely recognition of IC is essential to driving clinical decision processes and dictating specific therapeutic strategies [13].

Measurement of the serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BG) is a non-invasive testing for circulating fungal cell wall components [14], that allows the systematic screening and prompt identification of fungal infections (with the exception of cryptococcosis and zygomycosis) [15]. This test is considered an aid for the diagnosis of fungemia and deep-seated mycoses including IC [1618], and it appears to be useful for patients with hematological malignancies [16, 17]. BG rises before infection becomes clinically apparent [16, 17], but the high false-positive rates [19, 20] make it necessary to refine its utility as a tool for the early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) [15].

At present, only clinical prediction rules of the risk of IC [2123] or simpler scoring systems that differentiate patients with Candida colonization from those with ongoing but still occult Candida infection [24, 25] are available. Their discriminative role varies; for example, a Candida score (CS) ≥3 was shown to select non-neutropenic critically ill patients at risk for IC more accurately than the Candida colonization index [25]. Although based on preliminary data, León et al. [26] underscored the clinical usefulness of combining CS and serum levels of BG to discriminate between colonization and proven Candida infection.

The present study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of CS, colonization index, and the serum BG detection in a prospective cohort of ICU patients at risk for Candida sepsis.

Materials and methods

Patients and specimen collection

The study was conducted in an 18-bed adult ICU of a tertiary university teaching hospital admitting approximately 900 patients per year. The local institutional review committee approved the study, and informed consent was waived because of the observational nature of this study. All patients consecutively admitted to our ICU between March and August 2010 with signs of sepsis [27] were eligible for enrollment in this study. Patients were enrolled if they had stayed in the ICU for more than five days, had not been diagnosed with and then treated for IFI at baseline, and had a neutrophil count ≥500/mm3 (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Flow chart of the study patients. ICU, intensive care unit; IFI, invasive fungal infection.

Age, gender, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) [28] and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [29], primary diagnosis, presence of various known risk factors for candidiasis (for example, an indwelling venous catheter, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, or treatment with corticosteroids), abdominal surgery, and outcome were recorded. Variables potentially influencing BG test results, such as renal replacement therapy, bacteremia, and recent administration of albumin, immunoglobulin products, or a β-lactam antibiotic (that is, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or piperacillin-tazobactam) [20, 30], were also recorded.

Antifungal treatment was started at the discretion of the attending physician.

For all patients, specimens from the Candida surveillance sites, such as rectum, oropharynx, skin (axillary surface), and urinary tract, were obtained on the day of admission to the ICU and at Days 0 and 3 following enrollment, and once a week thereafter until discharge from the ICU or death. Specimens for cultures from other anatomical sites were ordered by the attending physician, as clinically indicated. For each patient and only at the onset of sepsis, blood specimens were simultaneously obtained for BG assay (from a peripheral venipuncture and/or an arterial line) and for culture (from a peripheral venipuncture and/or intravascular catheter). Blood cultures were processed using the automated BACTEC system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instruments, Sparks, MD, USA).

Definitions of IFIs and Candida colonization

Proven IFI was determined on the basis of the European Organization of the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria [31], modified such that they could be applied with greater relevance to non-neutropenic adults [32], excluding BG detection as a microbiological criterion. Proven IC was defined by: i) histological evidence of yeast cells or hyphae or pseudohyphae from normally sterile site (that is, fluid obtained by drain), ii) blood culture positive for Candida species, or iii) positive culture result for sample from any other sterile site (excluding urine, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, mucous membrane swabs, and specimens from skin sites) [32]. Candidemia was considered to be catheter-related if simultaneous quantitative cultures showed a ratio of ≥ 5:1 in colony-forming unit of blood samples obtained through the catheter and a peripheral vein. Patients with proven invasive mold infection had histological evidence of tissue invasion by filamentous fungi, the isolation of a mold from a normally sterile but clinically infected body site (excluding bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, a cranial sinus cavity specimen, and urine), or blood culture that yields a mold (for example, Fusarium species) in the context of a consistent infectious disease process [31].

Candida colonization was defined as positive culture for fungal species from any of the above mentioned surveillance sites. Colonization was considered, respectively, unifocal or multifocal when Candida species were isolated from one focus or simultaneously from various non-contiguous foci [26]. Candiduria was defined as the presence of at least 104 colony-forming units/mL of the same Candida species [26].

CS and colonization index

The CS and colonization index were calculated when results of the patients' surveillance cultures, with the exception of blood cultures, were available. The CS for a cut-off value of 3 was as follows: total parenteral nutrition × 1, plus surgery × 1, plus multifocal Candida colonization × 1, plus severe sepsis × 2 [26]. The colonization index was calculated as the ratio of the number of culture-positive surveillance sites to the total number of sites cultured [24]. The cut-off points for discriminating between Candida species colonization and IC were ≥3 for the CS and ≥0.5 for the colonization index [24, 25]. For each patient, maximum values recorded for CS and colonization index at or before the episode of IC were used in the analysis. In the absence of IC, the maximum of all observed values was used.

BG assay

Patients' sera recovered from arterial and/or venous blood specimens (see above) were tested for BG (Fungitell®; Associates of Cape Cod Inc, Falmouth¸ MA, USA) as recommended by the manufacturer. The concentration of BG in each sample was automatically calculated using a calibration curve with standard solutions ranging from 31.25 to 500 pg/mL. The manufacturer's BG cut-off of 80 pg/mL was used. All samples were analyzed in triplicate and the mean was assigned as the final result for the specimen. Assay results were not reported to treating clinicians.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using STATA 10 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA). Normally distributed continuous variables were reported as mean ± SD and compared using Student's t test. Medians with ranges were used to describe non-normally distributed continuous variables, and compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were reported as percentages and compared using the two-tailed χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. The following parameters of diagnostic performance and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR, NLR), and Cohen's kappa. The discriminatory powers for BG, CS, and colonization index were evaluated by their respective areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs). ROC AUC comparisons were performed using the method of Hanley and McNeil [33].

Results

Of 377 patients with clinical signs of sepsis admitted to the ICU during the study period, 95 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria above specified were enrolled as participants (Figure 1). Characteristics of the 95 subjects (16 case patients in the IFI group and 79 patients in the group without evidence of IFI) are shown in Table 1. The majority of patients (74%) had at least one predisposing defined host (that is, use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressants) and/or risk factors. Nonetheless, no patients with probable/possible IFI were identified on the basis of modified EORTC/MSG criteria.
Table 1

Demographics and clinical characteristics of studied groups

 

Total

(n= 95)

IFIa

(n= 16)

No IFI

(n= 79)

P

Age, median years (range)

69 (18 to 93)

74 (53 to 82)

69 (18 to 93)

0.12

Male sex (%)

65 (68.4)

11 (68.8)

54 (68.4)

0.97

SAPS II, median (range)

47 (14 to 76)

49.5 (26 to 74)

46 (14 to 76)

0.18

SOFA, median (range)

6 (0 to 16)

5.5 (0 to 15)

6 (0 to 16)

0.33

ICU stay, median days (range)

    

Before sepsis onset

7 (6 to 67)

8.5 (6 to 34)

7 (6 to 67)

0.95

Overall

20 (6 to 180)

28 (7 to 92)

20 (6 to 180)

0.24

ICU mortality (no.,%)

23 (24.2)

6 (37.5)

17 (21.5)

0.20

Diagnosis on ICU admission (no.,%)

Medical

Surgical

Trauma

61 (64.2)

12 (12.6)

22 (23.2)

13 (81.3)

2 (12.5)

1 (6.2)

48 (60.8)

10 (12.7)

21 (26.6)

0.12

1

0.11

Multifocal Candida colonization (no.,%)

40 (42.1)

10 (62.5)

30 (37.9)

0.07

Abdominal surgery (no.,%)

11 (11.6)

2 (12.5)

9 (11.4)

1

Risk factors (no.,%)

    

Mechanical ventilation

85 (89.5)

16 (100)

69 (87.3)

0.20

Central venous catheter

86 (90.5)

15 (93.7)

71 (89.9)

0.63

Broad to spectrum antibiotics

71 (74.7)

14 (87.5)

57 (72.2)

0.19

Total parenteral nutrition

10 (10.5)

7 (43.7)

3 (3.8)

< 0.001

Corticosteroids

8 (8.4)

3 (18.7)

5 (6.3)

0.13

Renal replacement therapy

12 (12.6)

5 (31.3)

7 (8.9)

0.03

Underlying diseases (no.,%)

    

COPD

20 (21.1)

5 (31.2)

15 (19.9)

0.27

Solid transplants

1 (1.1)

1 (6.3)

0

0.17

HIV

1 (1.1)

1 (6.3)

0

0.17

Solid cancer

12 (12.6)

3 (18.7)

9 (11.4)

0.40

Hematological malignancy

1 (1.1)

1 (6.3)

0

0.17

Cirrhosis

1 (1.1)

1 (6.3)

0

0.17

Chronic renal failure

24 (25.3)

8 (50.0)

16 (20.3)

0.02

Diabetes

51 (53.7)

10 (62.5)

41 (51.9)

0.44

Clinical condition (no.,%)

    

Severe sepsis

54 (56.8)

5 (31.2)

49 (62.0)

0.02

Septic shock

21 (22.1)

10 (62.5)

11 (13.9)

< 0.001

Pneumonia

29 (30.5)

5 (31.3)

24 (30.4)

1

Gram-positive bloodstream infectionb

11 (11.5)

1 (6.2)

10 (12.6)

0.46

Gram-negative bloodstream infectionc

7 (7.4)

0

7 (8.9)

0.21

Other bacterial infectiond

15 (15.7)

3 (18.7)

12 (15.2)

0.72

No. of patients (%) with a:

    

Positive BG result

20 (21.1)

15 (93.7)

5 (6.3)

< 0.001

CS value ≥3

21 (22.1)

12 (75.0)

9 (11.4)

< 0.001

Colonization index ≥0.5

33 (35.1)

9 (56.3)

24 (30.4)

0.04

BG, (1→3)-β-D-glucan; COPD; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CS, Candida Score; IFI, invasive fungal infection; SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; a Two patients developed pulmonary aspergillosis or fusariosis.

b By coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 5), Staphylocccus aureus (n = 3), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 2), or Streptococcus mitis (n = 1).

c By Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1), Escherichia coli (n = 1), Providencia stuartii (n = 1), Enterobacter aerogenes (n = 1), or Proteus mirabilis and P. aeruginosa (n = 1).

d Include urinary tract, wound, or fluid infections.

The overall prevalence of IFI was 16.8%. Proven cases included 2 pulmonary mold infections (1 with Aspergillus fumigatus and 1 with Fusarium solani) and 14 Candida infections, of which 13 candidemia (10 with C. albicans, 1 with C. glabrata, 1 with C. parapsilosis, and 1 with C. tropicalis) and 1 mediastinitis (with C. albicans). Eighteen patients had documented bacterial bloodstream infections (1 with and 17 without concomitant IFI).

Thirteen of 95 patients (only 1 of the IFI group) were receiving empirical antifungal therapy (7 with echinocandin and 6 with fluconazole) two to four days before testing.

Blood sampling for BG serum measurement

A total of 130 serum samples were tested with the BG assay. For the first enrolled 35 patients, BG was measured in 70 paired sera from their respective venous and arterial blood specimens, which were collected concomitantly in order to assess the equivalence of measuring BG in blood samples obtained from peripheral venipuncture or from arterial catheters. This is also in consideration that the pre-analytical environmental contamination by BG of the tested blood is generally considered a major limitation of this assay.

Using the predefined cut-off value of 80 pg/mL, 10 of 35 patients had arterial and venous sera that tested as positive for BG. For the remaining 25 patients, both the serum specimens tested as negative for BG (range, 10 to 65 pg/mL). The BG levels obtained in the arterial and venous specimens were not different: 355.5 ± 140.9 and 347.5 ± 148.9 pg/mL, respectively (P = 0.24). Figure 2 shows the overall test results for the 10 BG-positive patients according to IC diagnosis. The BG level in the true BG-positive sera (464 ± 81 pg/mL) was significantly higher than in the false BG-positive sera (217 ± 115 pg/mL) (P < 0.001). Since the BG assay worked well also with the serum retrieved from non-venous blood sampling, only arterial blood specimens were subsequently used for BG determination in the other 60 study participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2

(BG results of sera from two blood sampling sites for subjects with or without IC.

Overall, sera from 95 patients were evaluated. Patients with IFI were compared to patients who had no identified IFI according to the ICU-adapted EORTC/MSG criteria (Table 1). Fifteen of 16 IFI patients yielded BG-positive results. Among the patients who had no IFI, only 5 of 79 patients tested had BG-positive results. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BG testing for the diagnosis of IFI in all 95 patients were 93.7%, 93.6%, 75.0%, and 98.6%, respectively.

IC according to BG assay, colonization index, and CS

Fourteen of the 95 patients with BG serum level determinations (Table 1) had an ongoing IC. In 13 the BG was positive and in 1 was negative. The features of these patients are summarized in Table 2. The mean BG level was 436.42 ± 132.13 pg/mL, whereas the median of the BG levels for the 14 patients was 500 (range 27 to ≥500) pg/mL. The patient with a negative BG test had received, four days before the serum sampling, antifungal treatment with caspofungin, an antifungal drug that interferes with BG synthesis. In all 13 patients, a positive BG assay result was obtained 24 to 72 hrs before a positive bloodstream culture result.
Table 2

Fourteen patients with proven invasive Candida infection and their serum BG measurements before diagnosis

No.

SAPS II

Underlying conditions

Clinical syndrome/admission diagnosis

Type/source of infection

BG level (pg/mL)a

Antifungal treatment

Outcome

LOS ICU

(days)

8

35

Steroid therapy, solid cancer

Respiratory failure, severe sepsis

Candidemia/unknown

≥500

Caspofungin

Alive

30

15

48

Diabetes, obesity, chronic renal failure

Septic shock

Candidemia/UTI

≥500

Anidulafungin

Dead

7

18

69

Chronic renal failure, diabetes

Respiratory failure, septic shock

Mediastinitis/Unknown

≥500

Anidulafungin

Dead

12

21

64

COPD

Septic shock

Candidemia/unknown

≥500

Anidulafungin

Alive

8

29

61

Diabetes, chronic heart failure

Respiratory failure, severe sepsis

Candidemia/UTI

480

Anidulafungin

Dead

92

32

67

Chronic heart failure, solid cancer

Respiratory failure

Candidemia/CVC

400

Fluconazole

Alive

26

35

45

Hematological malignancy, diabetes

Septic shock

Candidemia/unknown

255

Anidulafungin

Dead

7

51

65

AIDS, cirrhosis

Septic shock, ALI

Candidemia/CVC

322

Caspofungin

Dead

7

57b

59

Obesity, solid cancer

Respiratory failure, septic shock

Candidemia/CVC

27

Caspofungin

Dead

14

60

39

Renal transplant, steroid therapy

Trauma, severe sepsis

Candidemia/CVC

≥500

Caspofungin

Alive

35

74

51

Intestinal occlusion, chronic renal failure

Respiratory failure, severe sepsis

Candidemia/unknown

≥500

Anidulafingin

Alive

65

79

26

COPD, chronic hearth failure, diabetes

Septic shock, respiratory failure

Candidemia/CVC

≥500

Anidulafungin

Alive

45

87

41

Chronic hearth failure, COPD, diabetes, abdominal surgery

Severe sepsis, respiratory failure

Candidemia/UTI

≥500

Caspofungin

Alive

45

89

30

Chronic hearth failure, abdominal surgery, chronic renal failure

Septic shock

Candidemia/UTI

≥500

Caspofungin

Alive

50

a Values of ≥500 pg/mL were converted to the 500-pg/mL ones for statistical analysis.

b This patient was empirically treated with caspofungin before BG testing.

ALI, acute lung injury; COPD; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVC, central venous catheter; LOS, length of stay; SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; UTI, urinary tract infection

A number of surveillance specimens from the 95 patients were screened for the presence of Candida species. A colonization index ≥0.5 was found in 30.4% (24/79) of no-IFI patients and in 56.3% (9/16) of patients with IFI (P = 0.04) (Table 1). IC according to the colonization index occurred in 7 of 33 patients.

As shown in Table 1 the percentage of patients with severe sepsis was significantly higher in the no-IFI group (P = 0.02), whereas septic shock was significantly higher in patients with IFI (P < 0.001). Total parenteral nutrition was also significantly higher in the group of IFI (P < 0.001). Ten of 21 patients with a CS ≥3 had an ongoing IC.

Diagnostic test indices for IC are presented in Table 3. BG had better results when compared with CS and colonization index in all studied variables. In particular, the BG test gave a significantly higher number of positive results with a sensitivity of 92.9% versus 85.7% of CS and 64.3% of the colonization index. The specificities of BG, CS, and colonization index were also dissimilar (93.7%, 88.6%, and 69.7%, respectively). The areas under the ROC curves for BG, CS, and colonization index were 0.98 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.00), 0.80 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.92), and 0.63 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.79) (Figure 3). The agreement between BG assay and CS was moderate (kappa = 0.53) and that between BG assay and colonization index was poor (kappa = 0.10).
Table 3

Performances of (1→3)-β-D-glucan assay (BG), Candida score (CS), and colonization index for detection of invasive candidiasis in 95 patients

 

Sensitivity (%)

(95% CI)

Specificity (%)

(95% CI)

PPV (%)

(95% CI)

NPV (%)

(95% CI)

PLR (%)

(95% CI)

NLR (%)

(95% CI)

BG cut-off value, 80 pg/mL

92.9 (66.1 to 99.8)

93.7 (85.8 to 97.9)

72.2 (46.5 to 90.3)

98.7 (92.8 to 99.9)

14.74 (4.65 to 47.52)

0.07 (0.02 to 0.39)

CS ≥3

85.7 (57.2 to 98.2)

88.6 (79.5 to 94.7)

57.1 (34.0 to 78.2)

97.2 (90.3 to 99.7)

7.51 (2.79 to 18.29)

0.16 (0.02 to 0.54)

Colonization index ≥0.5

64.3 (35.1 to 87.2)

69.6 (58.2 to 79.5)

27.3 (13.3 to 45.5)

91.7 (81.6 to 97.2)

2.12 (0.84 to 4.25)

0.51 (0.16 to 1.11)

Figure 3
Figure 3

ROC AUC curves of BG, CS, and colonization index for proven IC cases. [The AUC of BG was significantly higher than those of CS (P < 0.001) and colonization index (P < 0.001), please edit this sentence as a footnote].

The combination of a positive BG result and a CS value ≥3 increased the sensitivity (100% (95% CI, 76.8% to 100%)) and NPV (100% (95% CI, 94.6% to 100%)) for diagnosis of IC, compared to 92.9% and 97.2% for the BG test alone, respectively. Conversely, the specificity (83.5% (95% CI 73.5% to 90.9%)) and PPV (51.8% (95% CI, 31.9% to 71.3%)) based on combined tests was lower than those of the BG test (93.7% and 72.2%, respectively).

Among the 5 patients with false-positive BG tests, 4 were treated with β-lactams and 1 was exposed to surgical gauze, whereas 36 of the BG-negative patients were receiving β-lactam antibiotic therapy and 4 underwent a surgical gauze packing before BG testing.

Discussion

Using a single sample of patients obtained at the onset of the septic syndrome in our evaluation, which included 16 subjects with IFI and 79 with no IFI, a BG level ≥80 pg/mL had sensitivity and specificity of 93.7% and 93.6% for confirmed IFI, respectively. With respect to prior studies [15, 34], overall BG assay sensitivity was higher in our cohort, likely because of lack of subjects in the EORTC/MSG categories with inherent diagnostic uncertainty (possible or probable IFI) and/or in whom no active IFI occurred at the time of sampling. Accordingly, BG sensitivity for patients with proven IC was 92.9%, whereas all but five episodes of non-fungal infections had BG concentrations higher than the cut-off value (specificity 91.4%).

In a multicenter evaluation of the Fungitell kit conducted in the United States by Ostrosky-Zeichner et al. [35], the sensitivity of the assay for patients with proven IC (n = 107; cut-off, 80 pg/mL) was 77.6% based on a single sample obtained from the patient within 72 hrs after entry into the study. A single-sample strategy was also adopted in studies that, similarly to ours, involved patients who had or developed systemic Candida infections (for review, see Karageorgopoulos et al. [36] and the references therein), in which BG assay sensitivity for proven or probable IC ranged from 85% [19] to 92% [37]. Although obtaining multiple samples increased specificity and PPV of the BG assay for subjects with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome [16], this may be not the case for ICU patients, for whom it could be important to explore the performance of the assay with a single-sample protocol. This protocol was believed to be potentially closer to the way in which the assay could be used in ICU clinical settings [35].

Our BG sampling strategy involved the use of a blood specimen drawn from an arterial line. In the ICU setting, arterial catheters allow continuous real-time blood pressure monitoring and reduce the need for repeated punctures for blood gas analysis. Therefore, it was reasonable to assess whether this blood source could be exploited for microbiological tests, instead of a central venous catheter (nine of our patients did not harbor this device). This was, also, in view of a recent study showing no significant statistical difference in rates of contamination between venous and arterial sites of blood draw [38], at least for patients not particularly vulnerable to fungal colonization/infection, such as burn patients. To date, this is the first evaluation enabling use of the Fungitell kit with sera retrieved from arterial blood specimens, and, in our opinion, information that measurements obtained from either arterial or venous blood samples are equivalent. It could represent a new and very useful practical aspect.

The use of certain intravenous antimicrobials (for example, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) or gauze packing of serosal surfaces may be a source of false-positive BG measurements [39]. We detected a high level of BG in five patients without evidence of fungal infection, one of whom was undergoing extensive intra-abdominal gauze exposure following surgery and four were receiving antimicrobial treatment with β-lactams. However, considering that 4 of the patients with true-negative BG results were exposed to surgical gauze and 36 were treated with β-lactam antibiotics, it is unlikely that a casual relationship between the presence of BG in the blood specimens and medical interventions exists in our patients. Despite the wide use of intravenous albumin or immunoglobulins and/or hemodialysis in ICU patients, such medical treatments did not lead to a false-positive BG elevation in our patients. Some studies also reported a high number of false positives in patients with bacteremia, especially that caused by Gram positive organisms [40, 41]. In one study comparing patients with blood cultures positive for yeast (proven or probable IFI) versus bacteremic patients, this appeared to reduce the specificity of the test and to place its PPV at 52%, but given the nature of the samples obtained the authors admitted that BG contamination may have occurred [40]. In another study analyzing a single specimen in 46 subjects from ICUs, Digby et al. [41] observed that serum BG levels were elevated on average in all patients with either fungal or bacterial infection, even though hemodialysis as a source of false-positivity may be a factor in these observations. By contrast, no cross-reactivity of the BG assay in patients experiencing bacteremias was found in our study and in the prospective validation assays published to date [1517, 34].

Multisite colonization is a predictor for candidemia in the ICU, especially in combination with other risk factors reflecting severe disease [4, 42]. Thus, IC is highly improbable if a Candida- colonized critically ill patient has a CS < 3 [26]. Colonization by fungi was seen to not raise the concentration of BG [16, 34], while BG may reach the circulation through damaged intestinal or respiratory mucosa and causes positive test results. In this case, BG could be the marker of the gut barrier invasion prior to infection. Of interest, studying a patient population different from ours but with similar risk profiles, Senn et al. [17] showed that all of the false-positive BG assay results (4%) were observed in patients with gastrointestinal fungal colonization and/or mucositis who received empirical therapy, suggesting an occult IC at an early stage. Few studies have performed direct comparisons of the BG assay, CS, and colonization index for identifying patients at risk of development of IC [26]. In our study, we found that 10 of 13 BG positive patients with proven IC (true positive) had a CS ≥3 and 7 a colonization index ≥0.5, and these findings, on the one hand, reinforce the discriminatory power of BG testing between patients with true IC and those without IC and, on the other hand, suggest its use to make diagnosis more quickly. However, the not too high concordance observed warrants additional investigations whether the three tests can be used as complements to each other, although an analysis of diagnostic performance combining BG assay and CS showed that combined use of the two tests enhanced the sensitivity and NPV for the diagnosis of IC.

Aside from the low frequency of cases of proven IC, the experimental design of our study, giving an estimation of the prevalence of IFI in the target population, allowed an assessment of PPV and NPV by use of BG testing. With a prevalence of fungal infection of 16.8%, the PPV for the BG test was 72.2%, in spite of a very high NPV (approximately 99%). Therefore, a strong diagnostic benefit of BG testing lies in excluding IFI (and IC), according to that reported earlier [20, 35, 43], while an unresolved question about the BG testing remains the knowledge of factors that could increase BG levels for reasons other than IFI. Nevertheless, the small number of subjects studied, leading to broad CI intervals, should lower the strength of our observations. Additionally, the pre-test probability of IC in our study population was high given that 74% of the patients presented with risk factors for IFI, thus possibly limiting the generalizability of our data to other patients. However, a strict but effective patient selection strategy such as that adopted in this study, if combined with a single-test approach, may have a major financial impact by reducing the laboratory costs associated with the use of this expensive biomarker.

We are aware of the potential limits of BG assay for detecting fungal infection that would yet balance key deficiencies in the current culture-based methods, such as poor sensitivity and delayed turnaround time. A similar scenario is offered by newer PCR techniques (for example, SeptiFast; Roche Molecular Systems, Mannheim, Germany), though their application to detect and identify fungal pathogens more rapidly than conventional culture might revolutionize the diagnosis and the management of sepsis [44]. However, provided an appropriate laboratory logistics, BG assay results can be obtained within a few hours, and then more rapidly than those of PCR techniques, which remain extremely complex and expensive for a routine microbiology laboratory.

Conclusions

The BG assay, based on arterial blood sampling, appears to be useful as a single-point assay for ICU patients with suspicion of Candida sepsis. In addition, a combination of CS and BG measurement in this setting may improve the diagnostic performance and the efficiency of management. However, this strategy deserves further study to assess its true value in early detecting ICs and thus reducing the increased mortality [3] and cost of ICU stay [45] caused by Candida infections.

Key messages

  • A timely diagnosis of IC in medical ICU patients with signs of sepsis is essential to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with Candida infection.

  • The culture-independent serum BG assay may allow early diagnosis of IC, even when one patient sample is tested at the onset of the septic syndrome.

  • The NPV for BG testing in our study population is nearly 99%, suggesting that a strong diagnostic benefit of this assay lies in excluding IC.

  • In all proven-IC cases, a positive BG result was obtained 24 to 72 hrs before a positive bloodstream culture result, thus overcoming the delayed turnaround time of conventional diagnostic methods.

  • A combined use of BG and CS may improve the diagnostic performance in ICU patients at risk for Candida sepsis, but additional investigations are needed.

Abbreviations

ALI: 

acute lung injury

AUC: 

area under the curve

BG: 

(1→3)-β-D-glucan

CI: 

confidence interval

COPD: 

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CS: 

Candida score

CVC: 

central venous catheter

EORTC/MSG: 

European Organization of the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group

IC: 

invasive candidiasis

IFI: 

invasive fungal infection

NLR: 

negative likelihood ratio

NPV: 

negative predictive value

PLR: 

positive likelihood ratio

PPV: 

positive predictive value

SAPS II: 

Simplified Acute Physiology Score II

SOFA: 

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

ROC: 

receiver operating characteristic

UTI: 

urinary tract infection

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the laboratory technician Emanuela Paniccia for its excellent work. This study was partially supported by a grant from the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Linea D1 2010.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Microbiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy
(2)
Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy
(3)
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy

References

  1. Marchetti O, Bille J, Fluckiger U, Eggimann P, Ruef C, Garbino J, Calandra T, Glauser MP, Täuber MG, Pittet D, Fungal Infection Network of Switzerland: Epidemiology of candidemia in Swiss tertiary care hospitals: secular trends, 1991-2000. Clin Infect Dis 2004, 38: 311-320. 10.1086/380637View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leroy O, Gangneux JP, Montravers P, Mira JP, Gouin F, Sollet JP, Carlet J, Reynes J, Rosenheim M, Regnier B, Lortholary O, AmarCand Study Group: Epidemiology, management, and risk factors for death of invasive Candida infections in critical care: a multicenter, prospective, observational study in France (2005-2006). Crit Care Med 2009, 37: 1612-1618. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819efac0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kett DH, Azoulay E, Echeverria PM, Vincent JL, Extended Prevalence of Infection in ICU Study (EPIC II) Group of Investigators: Candida bloodstream infections in intensive care units: analysis of the extended prevalence of infection in a intensive care unit study. Crit Care Med 2011, 39: 665-670. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206c1caView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blot S, Dimopoulos G, Rello J, Vogelaers D: Is Candida really a threat in the ICU? Curr Opin Crit Care 2008, 14: 600-604. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830f1dffView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Morrell M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH: Delaying the empiric treatment of Candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005, 49: 3640-3645. 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3640-3645.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, Bearden DT: Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis 2006, 43: 25-31. 10.1086/504810View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Parkins MD, Sabuda DM, Elsayed S, Laupland KB: Adequacy of empirical antifungal therapy and effect on outcome among patients with invasive Candida species infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007, 60: 613-618. 10.1093/jac/dkm212View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tumbarello M, Posteraro B, Trecarichi EM, Fiori B, Rossi M, Porta R, de Gaetano Donati K, La Sorda M, Spanu T, Fadda G, Cauda R, Sanguinetti M: Biofilm production by Candida species and inadequate antifungal therapy as predictors of mortality for patients with candidemia. J Clin Microbiol 2007, 45: 1843-1850. 10.1128/JCM.00131-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arendrup MC: Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010, 16: 445-452. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833e84d2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bassetti M, Trecarichi EM, Righi E, Sanguinetti M, Bisio F, Posteraro B, Soro O, Cauda R, Viscoli C, Tumbarello M: Incidence, risk factors, and predictors of outcome of candidemia. Survey in 2 Italian university hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007, 58: 325-331. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.01.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lepak A, Andes D: Fungal sepsis: optimizing antifungal therapy in the critical care setting. Crit Care Clin 2011, 27: 123-147. 10.1016/j.ccc.2010.11.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellepola AN, Morrison CJ: Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J Microbiol 2005, 43: 65-84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG, Fisher JF, Kullberg BJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, Infectious Diseases Society of America: Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009, 48: 503-535. 10.1086/596757View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mennink-Kersten MA, Verweij PE: Non-culture-based diagnostics for opportunistic fungi. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2006, 20: 711-727. 10.1016/j.idc.2006.06.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Koo S, Bryar JM, Page JH, Baden LR, Marty FM: Diagnostic performance of the (1-- > 3)-beta-D-glucan assay for invasive fungal disease. Clin Infect Dis 2009, 49: 1650-1659. 10.1086/647942View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Odabasi Z, Mattiuzzi G, Estey E, Kantarjian H, Saeki F, Ridge RJ, Ketchum PA, Finkelman MA, Rex JH, Ostrosky-Zeichner L: Beta-D-glucan as a diagnostic adjunct for invasive fungal infections: validation, cutoff development, and performance in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 2004, 39: 199-205. 10.1086/421944View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Senn L, Robinson JO, Schmidt S, Knaup M, Asahi N, Satomura S, Matsuura S, Duvoisin B, Bille J, Calandra T, Marchetti O: 1,3-Beta-D-glucan antigenemia for early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 46: 878-885. 10.1086/527382View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohr JF, Sims C, Paetznick V, Rodriguez J, Finkelman MA, Rex JH, Ostrosky-Zeichner L: Prospective survey of (1→3)-beta-D-glucan and its relationship to invasive candidiasis in the surgical intensive care unit setting. J Clin Microbiol 2011, 49: 58-61. 10.1128/JCM.01240-10PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Persat F, Ranque S, Derouin F, Michel-Nguyen A, Picot S, Sulahian A: Contribution of the (1-- > 3)-beta-D-glucan assay for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46: 1009-1013. 10.1128/JCM.02091-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Alexander BD, Smith PB, Davis RD, Perfect JR, Reller LB: The (1,3){beta}-D-glucan test as an aid to early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections following lung transplantation. J Clin Microbiol 2010, 48: 4083-4088. 10.1128/JCM.01183-10PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ibàñez-Nolla J, Nolla-Salas M, León MA, García F, Marrugat J, Soria G, Díaz RM, Torres-Rodríguez JM: Early diagnosis of candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients. J Infect 2004, 48: 181-192. 10.1016/S0163-4453(03)00120-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dupont H, Paugam-Burtz C, Muller-Serieys C, Fierobe L, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP, Mantz J, Desmonts JM: Predictive factors of mortality due to polymicrobial peritonitis with Candida isolation in peritoneal fluid in critically ill patients. Arch Surg 2002, 137: 1341-1346. 10.1001/archsurg.137.12.1341View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Sable C, Sobel J, Alexander BD, Donowitz G, Kan V, Kauffman CA, Kett D, Larsen RA, Morrison V, Nucci M, Pappas PG, Bradley ME, Major S, Zimmer L, Wallace D, Dismukes WE, Rex JH: Multicenter retrospective development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for nosocomial invasive candidiasis in the intensive care setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007, 26: 271-276. 10.1007/s10096-007-0270-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pittet D, Monod M, Suter PM, Frenk E, Auckenthaler R: Candida colonization and subsequent infections in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg 1994, 220: 751-758. 10.1097/00000658-199412000-00008PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. León C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Almirante B, Nolla-Salas J, Alvarez-Lerma F, Garnacho-Montero J, León MA, EPCAN Study Group: A bedside scoring system (" Candida score") for early antifungal treatment in nonneutropenic critically ill patients with Candida colonization. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 730-737. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000202208.37364.7DView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. León C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Galván B, Blanco A, Castro C, Balasini C, Utande-Vázquez A, González de Molina FJ, Blasco-Navalproto MA, López MJ, Charles PE, Martín E, Hernández-Viera MA, Cava Study Group: Usefulness of the " Candida score" for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 2009, 37: 1624-1633. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819daa14View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G, International Sepsis Definitions Conference: 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med 2003, 29: 530-538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993, 270: 2957-2963. 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG: The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996, 22: 707-710. 10.1007/BF01709751View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mennink-Kersten MA, Warris A, Verweij PE: 1,3-beta-D-glucan in patients receiving intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. N Engl J Med 2006, 354: 2834-2835. 10.1056/NEJMc053340View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Muñoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, et al.: Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 46: 1813-1821. 10.1086/588660PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McMullan R, Metwally L, Coyle PV, Hedderwick S, McCloskey B, O'Neill HJ, Patterson CC, Thompson G, Webb CH, Hay RJ: A prospective clinical trial of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of candidemia in nonneutropenic, critically ill adults. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 46: 890-896. 10.1086/528690View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143: 29-36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Obayashi T, Yoshida M, Mori T, Goto H, Yasuoka A, Iwasaki H, Teshima H, Kohno S, Horiuchi A, Ito A, et al.: Plasma (1-- > 3)-beta-D-glucan measurement in diagnosis of invasive deep mycosis and fungal febrile episodes. Lancet 1995, 345: 17-20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91152-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Alexander BD, Kett DH, Vazquez J, Pappas PG, Saeki F, Ketchum PA, Wingard J, Schiff R, Tamura H, Finkelman MA, Rex JH: Multicenter clinical evaluation of the (1-- > 3) beta-D-glucan assay as an aid to diagnosis of fungal infections in humans. Clin Infect Dis 2005, 41: 654-659. 10.1086/432470View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Karageorgopoulos DE, Vouloumanou EK, Ntziora F, Michalopoulos A, Rafailidis PI, Falagas ME: β-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2011, 52: 750-770. 10.1093/cid/ciq206View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mori T, Ikemoto H, Matsumura M, Yoshida M, Inada K, Endo S, Ito A, Watanabe S, Yamaguchi H, Mitsuya M, Kodama M, Tani T, Yokota T, Kobayashi T, Kambayashi J, Nakamura T, Masaoka T, Teshima H, Yoshinaga T, Kohno S, Hara K, Miyazaki S: Evaluation of plasma (1-- > 3)-beta-D-glucan measurement by the kinetic turbidimetric Limulus test, for the clinical diagnosis of mycotic infections. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1997, 35: 553-560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gonsalves WI, Cornish N, Moore M, Chen A, Varman M: Effects of volume and site of blood draw on blood culture results. J Clin Microbiol 2009, 47: 3482-3485. 10.1128/JCM.02107-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Marty FM, Koo S: Role of (1-- > 3)-beta-D-glucan in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Med Mycol 2009, 47: S233-S240. 10.1080/13693780802308454View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pickering JW, Sant HW, Bowles CA, Roberts WL, Woods GL: Evaluation of a (1- > 3)-beta-D-glucan assay for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43: 5957-5962. 10.1128/JCM.43.12.5957-5962.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Digby J, Kalbfleisch J, Glenn A, Larsen A, Browder W, Williams D: Serum glucan levels are not specific for presence of fungal infections in intensive care unit patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003, 10: 882-885.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Agvald-Ohman C, Klingspor L, Hjelmqvist H, Edlund C: Invasive candidiasis in long-term patients at a multidisciplinary intensive care unit Candida colonization index , risk factors, treatment and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis 2008, 40: 145-153. 10.1080/00365540701534509View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Obayashi T, Negishi K, Suzuki T, Funata N: Reappraisal of the serum (1-- > 3)-beta-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections--a study based on autopsy cases from 6 years. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 46: 1864-1870. 10.1086/588295View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Dark PM, Dean P, Warhurst G: Bench-to-bedside review: the promise of rapid infection diagnosis during sepsis using polymerase chain reaction-based pathogen detection. Crit Care 2009, 13: 217. 10.1186/cc7886PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Olaechea PM, Palomar M, León-Gil C, Alvarez-Lerma F, Jordá R, Nolla-Salas J, León-Regidor MA, EPCAN Study Group: Economic impact of Candida colonization and Candida infection in the critically ill patient. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004, 23: 323-330. 10.1007/s10096-004-1104-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Posteraro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement