Skip to main content

Practical considerations on hypoxemia and hypoxia in V-V ECMO patients

The Original Article was published on 25 April 2024

The Original Article was published on 20 September 2023

We would like to express our gratitude to Aravind Bommiasamy and his coauthors for their detailed analysis on the physiological impacts of cardiac output (CO) on oxygen supply in patients undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO). This foundational knowledge is crucial for effectively managing such complex cases [1].

Understanding the distinctions between hypoxemia and hypoxia is essential for caregivers. Hypoxemia refers to low oxygen saturation in the arterial blood, measurable through indicators such as So2 and paO2. Hypoxia, on the other hand, is the under-supply of oxygen at the tissue level, potentially leading to cell death. Although hypoxemia often results in hypoxia, the relationship is not absolute. For instance, mountaineers at the summit of Mt. Everest might experience significant hypoxemia (paO2 between 19.1 and 29.5 mmHg) without suffering from hypoxia [2]. In contrast, patients who have undergone cardiac arrest may exhibit hyperoxia but still sustain hypoxic brain damage due to compromised cardiac output [3].

At the bedside, while hypoxemia is easily measured, hypoxia is not, making it common practice to treat hypoxemia as a proxy to prevent potential hypoxia, despite hypoxemia not always indicating tissue damage. Therefore, in patients with V-V ECMO experiencing hypoxemia, our intervention algorithm focuses on optimizing oxygen supply. The central strategy here involves managing both the ECMO settings and the patient’s physiological parameters to enhance oxygen delivery. Notably, increasing cardiac output is one of the cornerstones to improving oxygen supply; the use of beta-blockers, which can reduce CO, is contraindicated in these scenarios even if they may appear to improve arterial oxygen saturation [1, 4].

Enhancing CO might initially lead to decreased arterial oxygen saturation, potentially raising concerns among healthcare team members. However, by calculating the product of saturation and CO (with unchanged hemoglobin level) before and after interventions, caregivers can be reassured that the overall oxygen supply to the patient has increased.

Beyond the specific context of VV ECMO therapy, determining the appropriate target values for arterial saturation remains a challenging task, emphasizing the distinct nature of oxygen supply versus saturation in clinical settings (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Algorithm to avoid hypoxia in V-V ECMO: Algorithm for preventing and managing hypoxia on V-V ECMO at the bedside. Both, patient as well as V-V ECMO factors must be optimized to improve oxygen supply to the tissue. Note, that increasing CO might lead to lower arterial oxygen saturation but still increase the oxygen supply to the patient. Abbreviations: Fm02: membrane fraction of oxygen, ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, RA-PA: right atrium (drainage) to pulmonary artery (return), CO: cardiac output

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Bommiasamy AK, Zakhary B, Ran R. Beta-blockade in V-V ECMO. Crit Care. 2024;28:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04923-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Grocott MP, Martin DS, Levett DZ, McMorrow R, Windsor J, Montgomery HE. Arterial blood gases and oxygen content in climbers on Mount Everest. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:140–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Izawa J, Komukai S, Nishioka N, Kiguchi T, Kitamura T, Iwami T. Outcomes associated with intra-arrest hyperoxaemia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a registry-based cohort study. Resuscitation. 2022;181:173–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Staudacher DL, Wengenmayer T, Schmidt M. Beta-blockers in refractory hypoxemia on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a double-edged sword. Crit Care. 2023;27:360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawid L. Staudacher.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Staudacher, D.L., Schmidt, M. & Wengenmayer, T. Practical considerations on hypoxemia and hypoxia in V-V ECMO patients. Crit Care 28, 205 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04972-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04972-6