Real-world inter-observer variability of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in intensive care medicine: the time has come for an update: authors’ reply
Critical Care volume 27, Article number: 182 (2023)
Thank you for the opportunity to reply to the letter from Pérez-Torres et al. regarding our manuscript . Pérez-Torres supports our main contention that it is time to update the SOFA score to ensure it fulfils current requirements following the many changes in clinical practice over the last three decades.
The example provided is self-explanatory: in 1996, the clinical use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) was virtually non-existent. Consequently, it was not considered within the respiratory dysfunction score. If the original rules described in the 1996 manuscript are applied, receiving VV-ECMO would score 3 points. If the rules are modified to incorporate VV-ECMO as a marker of greatest dysfunction, then the score would be 4. The goalposts have shifted.
A useful analogy is to compare a mathematical model to a molecule used for therapy. A change, even minor, in a single atom may result in no effect yet the molecule is different. Only after successful testing can it be implemented into clinical practice. This principle is not widely applied to mathematical models, even if the scientific reasoning is the same. We agree that it is time to change, and that the accumulation of these “small changes” was why we proposed the development and validation of a new “SOFA 2.0” score instead of a modification of the original system with the same name .
Thank you for raising the attention to this important yet grossly underestimated problem.
Availability of data and materials
Moreno R, Rhodes A, Piquilloud L, Hernandez G, Takala J, Gershengorn HB, Tavares M, Coopersmith CM, Myatra SN, Singer M, Rezende E, Prescott HC, Soares M, Timsit J-F, de Lange DW, Jung C, De Waele JJ, Martin GS, Summers C, Azoulay E, et al. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score: has the time come for an update? Crit Care. 2023;27:15.
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.
Rowan K. The reliability of case mix measurements in intensive care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 1996;2:209–13.
No funding received.
RM has no competing interest to declare relevant to this article. AR has no competing interest to declare relevant to this article. MS has no competing interest to declare relevant to this article. JLV is Editor-in-Chief of Critical Care—he has no other competing interest to declare relevant to this article.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Moreno, R., Rhodes, A., Singer, M. et al. Real-world inter-observer variability of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in intensive care medicine: the time has come for an update: authors’ reply. Crit Care 27, 182 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04468-9