Skip to main content

Reexamining cholinesterase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of delirium in high-risk populations

The Original Article was published on 06 December 2022

We read with interest the article Hughes et al. recently published in Critical Care describing the correlation between circulating levels of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activity in critically ill adults and their risk of delirium or coma [1]. The implementation of a point-of-care testing paradigm for serum AChE and BChE activity raises the possibility of identifying a population at high risk of developing delirium for future clinical trials.

Delirium is a state of acute brain failure seen commonly in critically ill individuals, variably associated with inattention, positive symptoms such as hallucinations or delusions, and altered level of consciousness, for which no treatment exists [2]. Although the pathophysiology of delirium remains obscure and complex, dysfunction of central neuromodulatory transmission by acetylcholine, norepinephrine and dopamine contributes to the development of the key behavioral manifestations of delirium [2]. High levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines are thought to impair cholinergic neurotransmission during critical illness, possibly acting as a final common pathway in the development of this syndrome [2]. Enhancing cholinergic neurotransmission during episodes of delirium has been proposed as an approach to prevent and treat delirium during critical illness [3].

Cholinergic deficits are also thought to underlie cognitive symptoms in adults with several types of dementias, including Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and vascular dementia [4], and these individuals are at high risk for developing delirium during hospitalization [2]. There is widespread clinical use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEi), which block the enzyme that degrades synaptic acetylcholine, in people with dementia. AChEi’s, like donepezil and rivastigmine, provide symptomatic benefit in neurocognitive disorders by reducing the slope of cognitive decline and improving functional independence [5]. Their use is generally well-tolerated, with major side effects including diarrhea and bradycardia. Importantly, large registry studies demonstrated reduced cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, as well as incident mortality, in people with dementia prescribed AChEis in the outpatient setting [6, 7].

Several randomized controlled trials have evaluated the ability of AChEi to prevent or treat delirium [8,9,10,11,12,13]; however, none has tested these medicines in a critically ill population enriched for preexisting central cholinergic deficits, such as those with dementia. Early studies that focused on prevention of delirium prior to an elective operation showed minimal benefit, although these were of varying methodological rigor [8, 9, 13, 14]. Unfortunately, a large trial comparing behavioral management with haloperidol and placebo versus haloperidol and rivastigmine in a general population of critically ill adults was stopped early due to a signal suggesting increased mortality in the rivastigmine group; however, differences in baseline characteristics between the groups call into question whether this would have been borne out in a fully powered trial [11]. One single prospective study tested whether rivastigmine would prevent post-operative delirium in a population with preexisting cognitive impairment [10]. This study, although small, suggested an impressive risk reduction in incident delirium and delirium severity. Whether these benefits would translate to a critically ill population with preexisting cognitive impairment remains unknown.

In support of the hypothesis that patients with preexisting cognitive impairment would benefit from AChEi during critical illness, we recently reported a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC database of nearly 60,000 ICU admissions at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston [15]. When older adults with preexisting dementia were stratified based on whether they were prescribed donepezil before admission, those receiving donepezil had lower rates of incident delirium, in-hospital mortality, 90-day post-discharge mortality, lengths of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, despite similar illness severity and comorbidities at admission. Causal inference methods demonstrated that the reduction in incident delirium mediated donepezil’s effect on length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.

We propose a reexamination of the role for AChEi’s in delirium prevention and treatment during critical illness (Fig. 1). Given the broad range of predisposing factors and precipitants for delirium among critically ill patients [14], careful study population selection, including those with preexisting cognitive impairment or biomarkers of reduced cholinergic signaling, may maximize the potential for detecting a clinically relevant benefit. Designing such a clinical trial would necessitate identifying a population at high risk for developing delirium. At ICU admission, the use of rapid point-of-care testing for the measurement of serum AChE and BChE activity, such as that reported by Hughes et al. [1], or selection of those with co-existing cognitive impairment [15], could be used to further enrich a population with a cholinergic deficit. Randomization to AChEi initiation or placebo could then occur and in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes would be collected. Altogether, such studies would definitively test whether AChEi’s, medicines already in widespread clinical use and with substantial mechanistic support, would provide a benefit in the prevention or treatment of delirium during critical illness.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Proposed study design incorporating point-of-care testing in patients with baseline dementia to test whether AChEi may reduce the risk of delirium during critical illness. Designed on Biorender

We look forward to the next generation of studies that employ novel molecular diagnostics in high-risk populations to identify new treatments that can prevent or treat delirium during critical illness and improve outcomes among these vulnerable individuals.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hughes CG, Boncyk CS, Fedeles B, Pandharipande PP, Chen W, Patel MB, et al. Association between cholinesterase activity and critical illness brain dysfunction. Crit Care. 2022;26:377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson JE, Mart MF, Cunningham C, Shehabi Y, Girard TD, MacLullich AMJ, et al. Delirium. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hshieh TT, Fong TG, Marcantonio ER, Inouye SK. Cholinergic deficiency hypothesis in delirium: a synthesis of current evidence. J Gerontol Ser. 2008;63:764–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy R, Niccolini F, Pagano G, Politis M. Cholinergic imaging in dementia spectrum disorders. Eur J Nucl Med Mol. 2016;I(43):1376–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arvanitakis Z, Shah RC, Bennett DA. Diagnosis and management of dementia: review. JAMA. 2019;322:1589–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan ECK, Johnell K, Garcia-Ptacek S, Haaksma ML, Fastbom J, Bell JS, et al. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and risk of stroke and death in people with dementia. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2018;14:944–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Isik AT, Soysal P, Stubbs B, Solmi M, Basso C, Maggi S, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes of cholinesterase inhibitors in individuals with dementia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:1805–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcantonio ER, Palihnich K, Appleton P, Davis RB. Pilot randomized trial of donepezil hydrochloride for delirium after hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59:S282–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liptzin B, Laki A, Garb JL, Fingeroth R, Krushell R. Donepezil in the prevention and treatment of post-surgical delirium. Am J Geriat Psychiat. 2005;13:1100–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Youn YC, Shin H, Choi B, Kim S, Lee J, Ha Y. Rivastigmine patch reduces the incidence of postoperative delirium in older patients with cognitive impairment. Int J Geriat Psychiatry. 2017;32:1079–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van Eijk MM, Roes KC, Honing ML, Kuiper MA, Karakus A, van der Jagt M, et al. Effect of rivastigmine as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol on duration of delirium and mortality in critically ill patients: a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1829–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Overshott R, Vernon M, Morris J, Burns A. Rivastigmine in the treatment of delirium in older people: a pilot study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22:812–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gamberini M, Bolliger D, Buse GAL, Burkhart CS, Grapow M, Gagneux A, et al. Rivastigmine for the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery—a randomized controlled trial&ast. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1762–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ormseth CH, LaHue SC, Oldham MA, Josephson SA, Whitaker E, Douglas VC. Predisposing and precipitating factors associated with delirium. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6: e2249950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lieberman OJ, Lee S, Zabinski J. Donepezil treatment is associated with improved outcomes in critically ill dementia patients via a reduction in delirium. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2022.

Download references

Funding

Dr Douglas was supported by the Sara and Evan Williams Foundation Endowed Neurohospitalist Chair. Dr LaHue was supported by grants R03AG074035 from the National Institute on Aging (NIA), A137420 from the Larry L. Hillblom Foundation, P30 AG044281 from the NIA to the UCSF Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center and by the UCSF Bakar Aging Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OJL and SCL conceived the Comment. OJL wrote the manuscript and designed the figure. SCL edited the manuscript. VCD edited the manuscript and provided intellectual support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ori J. Lieberman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors declares competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lieberman, O.J., Douglas, V.C. & LaHue, S.C. Reexamining cholinesterase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of delirium in high-risk populations. Crit Care 27, 129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04413-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04413-w