Skip to main content

In-hospital cardiac arrest: evidence and specificities of perioperative cardiac arrest

A Correspondence to this article was published on 17 January 2023

The Original Article was published on 06 December 2022

To the Editor,

We read with great interest the article by Penketh and Nolan, which provides a comprehensive overview on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) [1]. We fully concur with the authors that guidelines for treatment of IHCA are lacking, and that several data are extrapolated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest literature. Despite the extensive evidence from rigorous randomized controlled trials, professional guidelines reflect little tangible progress and a main contributing factor is the stagnation of resuscitation science due to our poor knowledge of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms [2].

Regarding IHCA, this disheartening situation is more evident during the perioperative period as guidelines for treatment of perioperative cardiac arrest have been for long a major gap of knowledge. However, perioperative cardiac arrest has several specificities that are not detailed in Penketh’s review and that deserve considerations: potential neuroprotective effect of anesthesia drugs, immediate diagnosis in monitored patients, timely treatment by trained anesthesiologists, causes of cardiac arrest mostly related to preoperative complications, complications of anesthesia or complications of surgical procedures and finally, good long-term functional outcome [3].

In order to provide a scientific background for decision-making, as well as a guide for future research on perioperative cardiac arrest, the PERIOPCA Consortium recently published for the first time a consensus on 22 PICO questions specially formulated for the perioperative setting [4]. These recommendations (Table 1) are strengthened by a strict methodology including a modified Delphi consensus-building strategy and can be used in clinical practice.

Table 1 Summary of perioperative cardiac arrest (PERIOPCA) recommendations

Fortunately, the perioperative setting supports a physiology-guided treatment strategy to titrate the resuscitation efforts to patient’s physiological response. Therefore, translational research should be intensively used as a bridge between different areas of research to improve survival rates. Such an approach is currently investigated in the PERSEUS-PS randomized controlled trial (NCT04428060) [5].

We hope that the PERIOPCA recommendations and the results of the PERSEUS-PS trial will serve as a basis and would be of interest for the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation or the scientist who wants to build upon the available evidence.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Penketh J, Nolan JP. In-hospital cardiac arrest: the state of the art. Crit Care. 2022;26:376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chalkias A, Ioannidis JPA. Interventions to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a review of meta-analyses and future agenda. Crit Care. 2019;23:210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Constant AL, Montlahuc C, Grimaldi D, Pichon N, Mongardon N, LaurianeBordenave L, et al. Predictors of functional outcome after intraoperative cardiac arrest. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:482–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chalkias A, Mongardon N, Boboshko V, Cerny V, Constant AL, De Roux Q, et al. Clinical practice recommendations on the management of perioperative cardiac arrest: a report from the PERIOPCA Consortium. Crit Care. 2021;25:265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalkias A, Arnaoutoglou E, Xanthos T. Personalized physiology-guided resuscitation in highly monitored patients with cardiac arrest-the PERSEUS resuscitation protocol. Heart Fail Rev. 2019;24:473–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

QDR, AC, TX, and NM wrote and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Mongardon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Roux, Q., Chalkias, A., Xanthos, T. et al. In-hospital cardiac arrest: evidence and specificities of perioperative cardiac arrest. Crit Care 27, 17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04300-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04300-w