Skip to main content
  • Correspondence
  • Open access
  • Published:

Fluid intake, fluid output or fluid balance, which one matters in ARDS

The Original Article was published on 01 June 2022

To the editor,

In a recent trial including 650 COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [1], Dr. Ahuja et al. reported a linear association between cumulative fluid balance and successful liberation from invasive ventilation in the restricted cubic spline function models. This study is well designed, and the conclusions are clear. We want to add some comments.

The volume of fluid balance is calculated as fluid intake—fluid output. Although dozens of studies have reported that increased fluid balance volume is associated with poor prognosis in various diseases, it remains unclear which factor really matters with the prognosis: Fluid input? Fluid output or fluid balance? For instance, in the current study, the fluid intake volume within three days was quite close between the lower and higher tertiles, and the difference in fluid balance was mainly caused by the difference in urine output. However, is urine output or fluid balance the key factor in this relationship?

In clinical practice, fluid intake, output and fluid balance have complex interactions. Based on our previous findings, we suggest that the fluid accumulation index, which is derived from both fluid balance and fluid intake (fluid balance/fluid intake = 1 − fluid output/fluid intake), may play a vital role in the relationship with prognosis. For instance, studies have reported that patients with severe capillary leak may have a worse prognosis [2, 3]. However, as shown in Fig. 1, with different fluid intake and capillary leak severity, the fluid balance is the same in patients A and B, while the fluid accumulation index is different (0.4 vs. 0.8). In addition, our previous finding [4] also revealed a complete mediation relationship within fluid balance, fluid balance/fluid intake and mortality in sepsis, which suggested that the association between fluid balance and mortality is completely mediated by fluid balance/fluid intake ratio [5]. Therefore, compared to fluid balance, fluid intake or fluid output alone, the fluid accumulation index (fluid balance/fluid intake) can more accurately reflect the ability to excrete excessive fluid under different fluid loads and predict the prognosis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of intravenous crystalloid fluid in two hypothetic patients. Patient A: fluid intake 6000 ml, 15% of which goes into interstitial issue due to capillary leak and 60% was fluid output. Patient B: fluid intake 3000 ml, 55% of which goes into interstitial issue due to capillary leak and 20% was fluid output. Note: *25% is assumed according to one study (PMID: 34040918); # Fluid balance = fluid intake – fluid output

Finally, Dr. Ahuja et al.’s study added important information to the current knowledge of COVID-19, and their findings are highly appreciated. We hope our hypothesis will be helpful for further research.

Letter to the editor—Reply

Fluid intake, fluid output or fluid balance: Which one does not matter in ARDS?

In your journal, we recently showed that a higher cumulative fluid balance has an association with a longer duration of ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), suggesting that restricted fluid management in these patients may be beneficial [1].

Shen et al. correctly mention that fluid intake, fluid output and fluid balance have complex interactions, and that a ‘fluid accumulation index,’ an index derived from both the fluid balance and the fluid intake, may play a vital role in this association [4].

To test this hypothesis, we reanalyzed the database of ‘Practice of Ventilation in COVID–19 patients’ (PRoVENT–COVID), the study we used to test our original hypothesis [6]. Here, we present a sensitivity analysis that modeled the successful liberation of ventilation as a function of the fluid accumulation index in the Cox regression model after adjusting for potential confounders defined in our study. We also adjusted for the ‘fluid accumulation index’ and refitted our main regression model, i.e., cumulative fluid balance on the hazard of successful liberation from invasive ventilation.

The fluid accumulation index was not associated with successful liberation of ventilation, even after adjusting for potential confounders (P = 0.2853) (Fig. 2A). The association between cumulative fluid balance at day 3 and successful liberation of ventilation remained consistent by adjusting for the fluid accumulation index (P = 0.0068) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Marginal effect plots. A Association between day 3 fluid accumulation index and successful liberation of ventilation, adjusted for the potential confounder variables described in our study. B Association between cumulative fluid balance at day 3 and our primary outcome, adjusted for day 3 fluid accumulation index and the potential confounder variables described in our study

Based on these findings, we conclude that the fluid accumulation index has no added value in patients with ARDS due to COVID-19.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ahuja S, de Grooth HJ, Paulus F, van der Ven FL, Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Tuinman PR. COVID PR-CSCGPoVi: Association between early cumulative fluid balance and successful liberation from invasive ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS patients—insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study: a national, multicenter, observational cohort analysis. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cordemans C, De Laet I, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Huber W, Malbrain ML: Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance. Annals of intensive care 2012, 2(Suppl 1 Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal hyperten):S1.

  3. Lee WL, Slutsky AS. Sepsis and endothelial permeability. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(7):689–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen Y, Huang X, Cai G, Xu Q, Hu C, Ma C, Yan J. Impact of fluid balance on mortality is mediated by fluid accumulation index in sepsis: a cohort study. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;36(12):1458–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee H, Cashin AG, Lamb SE, Hopewell S, Vansteelandt S, VanderWeele TJ, MacKinnon DP, Mansell G, Collins GS, Golub RM, et al. A guideline for reporting mediation analyses of randomized trials and observational studies: the AGReMA statement. JAMA. 2021;326(11):1045–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Boers NS, Botta M, Tsonas AM, Algera AG, Pillay J, Dongelmans DA, Horn J, Vlaar APJ, Hollmann MW, Bos LDJ, et al. PRactice of VENTilation in patients with novel coronavirus disease (PRoVENT-COVID): rationale and protocol for a national multicenter observational study in The Netherlands. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(19):1251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YS and GC raised the question, and JY wrote the letter. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing Yan or Marcus J. Schultz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, Y., Cai, G. & Yan, J. Fluid intake, fluid output or fluid balance, which one matters in ARDS. Crit Care 26, 352 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04188-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04188-6