Skip to main content

Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard to assess REE in ICU patients: some limitations to consider

The Original Article was published on 27 February 2021

In their metanalysis, Duan et al. address the role of indirect calorimetry (IC) in nutritional therapy in critically ill patients [1].Their findings support using IC rather than predictive equations as the gold standard to assess resting energy expenditure (REE) [1]. Previous studies have demonstrated the low accuracy of various REE predictive equations based on weight, height, age, gender, etc. [1]. Despite adjustments according to patient population and other modifying factors, REE discrepancies remain, (with variations up to 60%) [1]. IC allows for the measurement of VO2 and VCO2 through the ventilator and is the gold standard method for measuring REE in ICU, when ideal test conditions are implemented [1]. Both the European (ESPEN) and American (ASPEN) clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of IC to measure REE [2]. While supporting the use of IC in some settings, we wish to point out a number of limitations, particularly when patients are undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) [3] and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [4, 5]. Estimating REE using IC in CRRT patients is less reliable for several reasons [3]. First, CO2 from bicarbonate-based dialysate can pass the filter and circulate in the form of dissolved CO2, bicarbonate, or carbamino compounds in red blood cells or plasma [3]. Though a quantity of CO2 may be removed in the effluent [3], a recent study showed that CO2 removal by CRRT led to a minimal change of 3% of measured EE [3] Second, patients may experience heat loss up to 1000 kcal during CRRT, resulting in increased metabolism and REE [3]. Third, dialysate compositions and citrate also contribute to caloric uptake [3]. For all these reasons, IC remains less reliable during CRRT and more research should shed light [3]. This is also true for IC performed in patients on ECMO, unless a mathematical correction is applied [3]. It is important that clinicians are aware not only of the indications for IC, but also its limitations. [3]. Other technical limitations of IC in ICU are discussed in a comprehensive review to which readers should refer [5].

Response to the letter to the editor: “Using indirect calorimetry in place of fixed energy prescription was feasible and energy targets were more closely met: do not forget an important limitation”

We thank Professor Honore et al. for their interest in our meta-analysis [1]. Our study identified 8 RCTs and demonstrated that compared with predictive equations, indirect calorimetry (IC) guided energy delivery can significantly reduce short-term mortality in critically ill patients without affecting other important clinical outcomes such as hospital stay and mechanical ventilation.

We fully agree with what Professor Honore and colleagues pointed out that clinicians need to understand not only indications of IC but its limitations [6]. Especially, Professor Honore highlighted that the use of IC might be unreliable in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Indeed, although all included RCTs in our meta-analysis provided detailed IC indications, only two trials had excluded patients receiving CRRT, and no trials reported having excluded patients with ECMO [1].

Cardiopulmonary bypass can remove part of VCO2, which is considered the most important technical factor affecting the reliability of IC measurement [6]. However, this does not mean that patients who receive CRRT or ECMO are bystanders of the IC technique. In a monocentric, controlled, prospective, observational pilot study, Wollersheim, and colleagues proposed measuring the reliability of energy expenditure (EE) in extracorporeal lung support patients by calculating the O2 uptake and the CO2 elimination by the ECLS membrane, then using sum O2 uptake and CO2 elimination in the equation of Weir to calculate EE [7].

Although CRRT may be more complicated due to factors such as replacement fluid, Jonckheer et al. proposed a simple blood gas analysis based on the circuit to quantify CO2 that was removal during continuous venovenous hemofiltration. In their study, the CO2 content in ultrafiltration is available by blood gas analysis, and the CO2 content is converted from mmoL to mL with the help of the ideal gas law (pV = nRT). The authors performed IC in 4 different states (baseline, high dose, baseline with NaCl predilution and without CVVH) and found that CO2 removal by CVVH led to a change in REE of only 3%, which makes a correction factor unnecessary in this setting [8]. Although the authors believed that citrate might be the only factor that significantly changes metabolism out of all the potential metabolic influences during CVVH, they also admitted that this required further research [8].

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

IC:

Indirect calorimetry

REE:

Resting energy expenditure

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ESPEN:

European society for parenteral and enteral nutrition

ASPEN:

American society for parenteral and enteral nutrition

CRRT:

Continuous renal replacement therapy

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

CRRT:

Continuous renal replacement therapy

ECMO:

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

IC:

Indirect calorimetry

REE:

Resting energy expenditure

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

References

  1. 1.

    Duan JY, Zheng WH, Zhou H, et al. Energy delivery guided by indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03508-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2019;38(1):48–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ostermann M, Lumlertgul N, Mehta R. Nutritional assessment and support during continuous renal replacement therapy. Semin Dial. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    De Waele E, Jonckheer J, Pen JJ, et al. Energy expenditure of patients on ECMO: a prospective pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(3):360–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13287.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schlein KM, Coulter SP. Best practices for determining resting energy expenditure in critically ill adults. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29(1):44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Honore PM, Barreto Gutierrez L, Kugener L, Redant S, Attou R, Gallerani A, De Bels D. Using indirect calorimetry in place of fixed energy prescription was feasible and energy targets were more closely met: do not forget an important limitation. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wollersheim T, Frank S, Müller MC, Skrypnikov V, Carbon NM, Pickerodt PA, Spies C, Mai K, Spranger J, Weber-Carstens S. Measuring energy expenditure in extracorporeal lung support patients (MEEP)-protocol, feasibility and pilot trial. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(1):301–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jonckheer J, Demol J, Lanckmans K, Malbrain MLNG, Spapen H, De Waele E. MECCIAS trial: metabolic consequences of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration on indirect calorimetry. Clin Nutr. 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PMH, SR and DDB designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting and reviewing. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick M. Honore.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare to have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honore, P.M., Redant, S., Preseau, T. et al. Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard to assess REE in ICU patients: some limitations to consider. Crit Care 25, 406 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03817-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Indirect calorimetry
  • REE
  • CRRT
  • ECMO