Skip to main content

Concern with reproducibility of rehabilitation after critical illness and hospital discharge

To the editor,

We read with great interest the article by Major and colleagues, who examined the feasibility of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program designed for patients with physical impairment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) who are discharged home [1]. However, we would like to highlight two concerns regarding this study.

First, the intervention of the REACH study was highly feasible and led to higher patient satisfaction; however, it is unclear how the intervention differs from usual care (UC). All patients in the intervention group received physical therapy (PT), but after 3 months, one-third of the intervention group had completed PT. The frequency of intervention was higher in UC, which is presumed to be based on the Dutch practical recommendation for PT [2]. In addition, the intervention rate of occupational therapy (OT) increased 2.5 times in 3–6 months compared to 0–3 months, showing an increase in contrast to PT. If more detailed information is provided regarding the termination criteria for PT and OT for intervention groups, it will be easier to reproduce high feasibility and patient satisfaction for patients with PICS.

Second, the high return to work (RTW) in the REACH study might be due to failure to return to the same job prior to the disease onset. The problem with RTW for critical illness survivors is the imbalance between the job workload and functional ability [3]. A recent review reported a 5%–84% worsening employment status and 17–66% occupation change in previously employed survivors of critical illness [4]. If the percentage of patients in each group returning to the same work as before the onset and the time to RTW is indicated, readers can understand how to support interdisciplinary collaboration and highly satisfied reinstatement.

Elucidating the aforementioned factors might help in better interpretation of the results and establish a better home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for physical impairment from PICS.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Major ME, Dettling-Ihnenfeldt D, Ramaekers SPJ, Engelbert RHH, van der Schaaf M. Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kwakman RCH, Major ME, Dettling-Ihnenfeldt DS, Nollet F, Engelbert RHH, van der Schaaf M. Physiotherapy treatment approaches for survivors of critical illness: a proposal from a Delphi study. Physiother Theor Pract. 2020;36(12):1421–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Su H, Hopkins RO, Kamdar BB, May S, Dinglas VD, Johnson KL et al. Association of imbalance between job workload and functional ability with return to work in ARDS survivors. Thorax. 2021 :thoraxjnl-2020-216586

  4. 4.

    Kamdar BB, Suri R, Suchyta MR, Digrande KF, Sherwood KD, Colantuoni E, et al. Return to work after critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2020;75(1):17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SK and ST critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kota Yamauchi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamauchi, K., Kina, S. & Taito, S. Concern with reproducibility of rehabilitation after critical illness and hospital discharge. Crit Care 25, 332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03745-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Post-intensive care syndrome
  • Critical illness
  • Rehabilitation
  • Return to work