Skip to main content

Monitoring and modifying brain oxygenation in patients at risk of hypoxic ischaemic brain injury after cardiac arrest

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2021. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2021. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901.

Introduction

The majority of adverse clinical outcomes following successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest, are attributable to hypoxic ischemic brain injury [1]. The cornerstone of hypoxic ischemic brain injury management has traditionally focused on preventing secondary ischemic injury, following the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) [2]. Among the various mechanisms implicated in the pathophysiology of secondary injury, post-resuscitation cerebral ischemia is linked to central physiologic variables that may be modifiable [3]. Observational data demonstrate associations between perturbations in physiologic variables known to reduce cerebral blood flow (CBF)—such as arterial hypotension [4] and hypocapnia [5]—and adverse clinical outcome. This adds credence to the importance of optimizing cerebral oxygen delivery, to mitigate secondary ischemic injury. Recently, sentinel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at augmenting mean arterial pressure (MAP)—a key physiologic determinant of cerebral oxygen delivery—have yielded important insights into the importance of mitigating secondary cerebral ischemia [6, 7]. Although it did not establish a definitive link to improved neurological outcome, the COMACARE study demonstrated reduced levels of neurofilament light, a biomarker of brain injury, in patients undergoing an augmented MAP strategy following ROSC [8]. Patients may continue to experience episodes of brain hypoxia following cardiac arrest, despite goal-directed therapy and augmented MAP, with considerable heterogeneity in the underlying cerebrovascular hemodynamics in individual patients [9]. Thus, a targeted approach to the individualized management of hypoxic ischemic brain injury in the post-resuscitation phase requires the longitudinal monitoring of brain oxygenation—providing clinicians with real time physiologic data points to optimize cerebral oxygen delivery, similar to that applied in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) [10]. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) provides an easily implemented and virtually complication-free way to monitor regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) in critically ill patients. The insertion of oxygen sensing catheters provides a real time assessment of the partial pressure of oxygen in brain tissue (PbtO2). This approach has gained widespread use following neurotrauma.

In this narrative review, we discuss the available means for monitoring the occurrence of brain ischemia in patients at risk of hypoxic ischemic brain injury. Specifically, we decided to review the evidence for non-invasive monitoring, using NIRS and invasive monitoring via the insertion of tissue oxygen monitors and jugular bulb catheters. These two approaches to monitoring brain oxygenation have different advantages and limitations (Fig. 1). We also discuss ways to modify cerebral oxygenation, with a special focus on MAP and blood carbon dioxide and oxygen levels.

Fig. 1
figure1

An overview of the advantages and disadvantages of one non-invasive and one invasive method used to monitor cerebral oxygenation in cardiac arrest patients

Cerebral oxygenation monitoring using NIRS

The level of oxygen in brain tissue is determined by the ratio between oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption, along with factors that influence the transfer of oxygen from the intravascular to the cellular compartment. The extent of hypoxic ischemic brain injury following cardiac arrest may be variably related to the degree and timing of aberrations in any or all of these variables. Importantly, the brain is able to maintain a relatively constant delivery of oxygen by maintaining CBF across a range of arterial blood pressure. This is referred to as cerebrovascular autoregulation [11]. In commercially available NIRS monitors, near infrared light is emitted from one diode—using at least two different wavelengths to assess oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) and total hemoglobin (Hb)—and received by another two diodes at separate distances. The latter feature enables the separation of light that has traversed the superficial (extracranial) versus deeper (intracranial, at a depth of 2–3 cm) tissues [12]. The NIRS sensors are commonly placed high on the temple in front of the hairline, thus illuminating the watershed area between the anterior and middle cerebral artery vascular territories. The rSO2 signal represents a ratio of HbO2/Hb. It is based on an assumption of fixed arterial and venous compartments, with the latter representing 70–75%, and is derived using proprietary algorithms that make it difficult to compare results obtained by different monitors. The inherent non-pulsatile nature of rSO2 means that it is, at best, a surrogate variable for CBF. The rSO2 is not just affected by anatomical confounders, such as the variable thickness of the extracranial tissues, the skull and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) area. It is also affected by dynamic factors, including anemia; by the patient’s acid-base status; by changes to the arteriovenous partitioning of blood; by tissue edema; and by progression of hypoxic ischemic brain injury to areas of non-metabolizing brain tissue. Generic to most clinical monitoring, rSO2 trends are more informative than absolute values. Yet it is unclear whether mean values, highest/lowest values or changes in values should be used as measures, and whether trends should be used to identify impending serious adverse events, to maintain a safety zone, or to trigger interventions. Concurrent changes in several variables—rather than in a single variable—may better reflect any underlying pathology; a growing number of reports of cerebrovascular autoregulation based on NIRS attests to an increasing interest in this approach. The physiological construct of using NIRS-derived rSO2 to monitor and potentially guide interventions against hypoxic ischemic brain injury entails the components of the rSO2 signal (e.g., blood transfusion, supplemental oxygen); the relation to oxygen delivery (e.g., supporting cardiac output and MAP, targeting optimal cerebrovascular autoregulation range); and the relation to oxygen consumption (e.g., targeted temperature management [TTM], analgosedation, seizure prophylaxis).

Regional tissue oxygenation in hypoxic brain injury

While the use of rSO2, to inform on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or to predict ROSC [13], supports the feasibility of NIRS in cardiac arrest and its potential to guide acute resuscitation, the main focus of this text is on post-resuscitation care. Multiple studies have been conducted, giving variable results regarding the possible differences in rSO2 values between patients with a good versus a poor functional outcome (Table 1). It appears biologically plausible that rSO2 values indicating that brain oxygen homeostasis has been maintained would be associated with survival and favorable neurological outcome. In an observational study of 28 cardiac arrest patients, rSO2 was lower following the initiation of hypothermia in non-survivors (n = 10) compared to survivors (n = 28) censored at hospital discharge [14]. Similar results were reported in 60 cardiac arrest patients, in which rSO2 during the first 40 h of intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring, including hypothermia and rewarming, was higher in patients with good outcomes (cerebral performance category [CPC] 1–2) compared to poor outcomes (CPC 3–5), both at ICU discharge and at 6 months, albeit with a large overlap in rSO2 values [15]. A larger prospective study (n = 107) of rSO2 during the first 48 h of ICU admission, including hypothermia and rewarming, and its association with outcome at 3 months reported statistically higher rSO2 in patients with good outcomes (CPC 1–2) compared to those with poor outcomes (CPC 3–5). Yet the study authors noted that the numerical differences were small and not conducive to a clinically useful discrimination of outcomes [16]. Based on data from the Japanese J-POP registry, an rSO2 > 40%—measured immediately upon arrival in the emergency department following cardiac arrest—was associated with favorable neurologic outcome at day 90 [17, 18]. A review of 22 observational studies, encompassing 2436 patients, corroborated the associations between increasing and higher rSO2 in the post-cardiac arrest period and favorable outcomes [19]. Meanwhile, several studies since the review—including 258 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients—have failed to demonstrate either a correlation or sufficient discriminative power for rSO2 and good versus poor outcomes [20,21,22,23,24], or have found it only in a specific range of initial rSO2 (between 41 and 60%) during TTM [25]. A recent review concluded that the clinical utility of monitoring rSO2 to prognosticate a favorable neurological outcome remains unclear [26]. Further clinical research is needed to establish the role of static versus dynamic rSO2 values; the cut-off values for correlations to patient-centered outcomes, including during different interventions for hypoxic ischemic brain injury, notably TTM; and the minimal duration of monitoring. It is also important to address the variability in reported rSO2 signals across different NIRS monitors [27] and overall cerebral tissue oxygenation [28].

Table 1 A selection of studies evaluating associations between near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measured and derived variables with outcome, in intensive care unit (ICU)-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Cerebral oxygenation index in hypoxic brain injury

Monitoring of rSO2 has been extended into the assessment of cerebrovascular auto-regulation, by investigating the simultaneous correlation with MAP (time domain analysis) based on the premise that short-term fluctuations in rSO2 are predominantly determined by changes in CBF. The correlation index—the cerebral oximetry index (COx)—may be used to assess cerebrovascular autoregulation, limits of autoregulation, and optimal MAP to support CBF [29,30,31,32]. In a prospective, observational study of 51 cardiac arrest patients monitored for the first 24 h of ICU admission during TTM at 33 °C, 35% demonstrated impaired and shifted autoregulation. A higher MAP (100 mmHg) was identified as supporting CBF, compared to patients with intact cerebrovascular autoregulation (85 mmHg). Mortality at 3 months was higher than for patients with preserved cerebrovascular autoregulation and the time spent below the optimal MAP was negatively correlated with survival [33]. In another prospective, observational study of 23 cardiac arrest patients undergoing TTM at 36 °C during the first 24 h and with active avoidance of pyrexia thereafter, intermittent monitoring during the first 3 days post-cardiac arrest demonstrated higher COx values. This was consistent with impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation in non-survivors, on each day and as an overall average, compared to survivors (all with CPC 1–2 at 3 months follow up) [24]. The optimal MAP was higher in non-survivors (107 mmHg), compared to survivors (66 mmHg). In a proof-of-concept study, continuous monitoring for a median of 30 h in 20 post-cardiac arrest patients managed with TTM 33–36 °C for the first 24 h was able to generate cerebrovascular autoregulation data in all patients. Of these, 15% demonstrated impaired autoregulation with the actual MAP ± 5 mmHg outside the identified optimal MAP in 50% of the monitored time. Increasing temperature was associated with an increased COx, suggesting impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation—particularly above 38 °C [34]. A prospective study in three Canadian teaching hospital ICUs demonstrated the feasibility of capturing COx and deriving optimal MAP in a median of 97% and 71%, respectively, of data collected during a median monitoring time of 47.5 h [35].

A variable correlation between COx and the pressure reactivity index—a cerebrovascular autoregulation reference standard of intracranial pressure (ICP) versus MAP—has been reported [36]. This may not seem surprising, given the limitations of rSO2 that remain intrinsic to COx. Furthermore, cerebrovascular autoregulation is far more complex than just a linear relation between CBF and MAP. It also includes other non-linear correlations, in particular with O2 and CO2, as well as significant heterogeneity across the cerebral vasculature and anatomical regions of the brain. Data from the COMACARE cohort are currently undergoing further investigation, focusing on COx with the important aspect of encompassing protocolized ranges of MAP, O2 and CO2 [37].

Invasive monitoring of cerebral oxygenation

ICP monitoring and invasive oxygen, blood flow and microdialysis catheters have mainly been used for research purposes in the management of patients after cardiac arrest, and are not recommended for routine care [38]. The risk of complications, such as brain hemorrhage, is the main reason for this; these complications may be markedly increased in cardiac arrest patients, given the use of anticoagulants, anti-platelet agents and TTM. In addition, cardiac arrest patients may be less commonly cared for in units with neurosurgical expertise. The availability and incorporation of multimodal invasive neuromonitoring is thus limited in post-cardiac arrest management. Recently, the research group of Sekhon and colleagues completed a prospective observational study using invasive PbtO2 monitoring in hypoxic ischemic brain injury following cardiac arrest [9]. They established feasibility and, interestingly, demonstrated a significant burden (~ 40% of the monitoring duration) of brain hypoxia (PbtO2 < 20 mmHg) despite goal-oriented management to optimize PbtO2 [9]. They also established key relationships between the physiologic determinants of cerebral oxygen delivery and PbtO2. Specifically, significant linear relationships between PbtO2 with MAP and the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were observed, across the cohort [9]. These data were subsequently followed up with a matched cohort study investigating clinical outcomes in patients with hypoxic ischemic brain injury managed using goal-directed care guided by invasive neuromonitoring, compared with the standard of care that did not include invasive neuromonitoring (Sekhon, personal communication, 2021). Although the clinical outcomes were significantly better in the invasive neuromonitoring group, significant limitations—including inherent biases, small sample size and study design—are important considerations when interpreting the findings. In the studies of invasive neuromonitoring to date, serious adverse events pertaining to the placement of invasive neuromonitoring have not been noted. However, the inherent risks associated with placement—namely, precipitating intracranial bleeding—are key considerations in invasive neuromonitoring. The reported rate of intracranial bleeding with invasive neuromonitoring is approximately 0.5–1% and the necessity for therapeutic hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest patients may increase this further. While noting the inherent limitations, these two studies provide feasibility and a path to studying the use of invasive neuromonitoring in select hypoxic ischemic brain injury cases, as a prospective method.

Jugular venous bulb oximetry is an alternative method of cerebral oxygen delivery and utilization monitoring. In this method, an intravascular catheter is placed retrograde into the dominant jugular vein and positioned at the level of the jugular bulb, to measure the oxygen saturation of Hb (SjvO2) as it exits the cerebral vasculature. Historically, hypoxic ischemic brain injury-related studies incorporating jugular venous bulb oximetry have focused on linking the absolute value of Hb saturation with clinical outcomes. Previous authors have shown that an increased SjvO2 or decreased oxygen extraction fraction, seen at the jugular bulb, is associated with worse outcomes and mortality [39]. Monitoring the metrics of brain oxygenation seems like an attractive therapeutic target to optimize. Yet the physiologic data garnered by both brain tissue oxygen and jugular venous bulb oximetry monitoring can provide insights into the underlying pathophysiologic phenotype that may be exhibited by individual patients with hypoxic ischemic brain injury. The approach of uniform cerebral oxygen delivery augmentation assumes that—once oxygen is delivered to the cerebral capillary bed—there is intact diffusion across the blood brain barrier and normal cellular oxygen utilization, culminating in neuronal aerobic metabolism. In other words, the necessary steps in the oxygen cascade encompass a coupling between cerebral oxygen delivery and diffusion, along with cellular utilization. It was recently shown that patients with hypoxic ischemic brain injury exhibit pathophysiologic phenotypes that are characterized by an uncoupling of these components of the oxygen cascade [40]. In a post-hoc analysis of invasive neuromonitoring in hypoxic ischemic brain injury, we characterized one subset of patients exhibiting diffusion limitation, wherein there was an uncoupling between cerebral oxygen delivery and diffusion into the brain parenchyma [41]. Conversely, the other phenotype was characterized by intact coupling between cerebral oxygen delivery and parenchymal diffusion [41].

To numerically quantify these phenotypes, the difference between the dissolved partial pressure of oxygen in the cerebral venous vasculature (PvO2) and the observed PbtO2 yields the PvO2-PbtO2 gradient. This represents the efficiency of oxygen diffusion into the parenchyma at the neurovascular unit [40]. When the patient is in a state of normal health, a reduction in cerebral oxygen delivery leads to increased oxygen extraction in the microvasculature and, hence, to a reduced PvO2-PbtO2 gradient. The inability to do so confirms a diffusion limitation; its detection is made possible by combining data points from simultaneous PbtO2 and jugular venous bulb oximetry (yielding the PvO2) monitoring [40]. Key future research must aim not just to incorporate monitoring of brain oxygenation in hypoxic ischemic brain injury, but also to use the characteristics of the cerebrovascular physiology in individual patients, to reconcile the underlying pathophysiologic processes at play and identify therapeutic targets.

Interventions available for modifying cerebral oxygenation

Studies conducted in patients with TBI have shown that, by increasing the fraction of inspired oxygen used, the amount of oxygen measured in brain tissue is greatly increased [42]. In the COMACARE trial, the use of moderate hyperoxia significantly increased cerebral oxygenation—even in the setting of normal MAP—with-out any major increase in markers of brain injury [8, 43]. A recent meta-analysis of RCTs, on the other hand, suggested an association between worse patient outcomes in patients routinely treated with higher oxygen fractions after cardiac arrest [44]. Importantly, no study to date has included oxygen within a multimodal strategy for the alleviation of brain tissue hypoxia.

Mild hypercapnia appeared to increase cerebral oxygenation in two conducted pilot studies, but with a variable effect on the markers of brain injury [8, 45]. The TAME (Targeted Therapeutic Mild Hypercapnia after Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest) trial is currently underway, with more than 1300 patients randomized to date [46]. Conversely, hypocapnia decreased CBF and cerebral oxygenation, as measured with NIRS and jugular bulb monitoring in patients undergoing TTM at 33 °C [47]. Overall, the ultimate effect of cerebral oxygenation caused by the modification of CO2 concentrations is likely to depend, to a large degree, on whether or not the patient has increased ICP and cerebral edema. There are limited data, thus far, on whether this is a common clinical problem in cardiac arrest patients—especially those undergoing TTM.

It is currently unclear whether targeting higher MAP, as a routine measure, will also result in increased cerebral oxygenation in cardiac arrest. The COMACARE trial included patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the initial rhythm and did not demonstrate any change in rSO2 with the higher MAP target. On the other hand, the Neuroprotect trial—which, in addition to increasing MAP, included the optimization of cardiac output with an inotrope and the use of packed red blood cell transfusions—showed increased rSO2 in the patients randomized to the higher MAP target. Interestingly, in a pooled analysis of a subset of patients with myocardial infarction and shock, the use of a higher MAP target alleviated myocardial injury [48].

Thus far, there is limited evidence on other means to improve brain oxygenation. Hb values of less than 10 g/dl have been associated with poor outcome in patients after cardiac arrest [49]. On the other hand, in the only RCT conducted in cardiac arrest patients that included maintaining Hb greater than 10 g/dl as an intervention, the need for a transfusion of packed red blood cells was uncommon [6]. The evidence on other means used to optimize cerebral oxygenation—using, for example, osmotherapy for increased ICP—lacks evidence in cardiac arrest patients [38].

Conclusions and need for future studies

There is no doubt that measuring cerebral oxygenation, either non-invasively or invasively, is necessary to detect cases of occult and potentially modifiable ischemia. The utility of NIRS to monitor cerebral oxygenation following hypoxic ischemic brain injury is exceedingly attractive—given its non-invasive ease of operation, which provides a continuous, real-time signal. Ongoing and future research will ultimately need to show whether this technology is ‘making important what we can measure’ or, instead, measuring what is important. The use of invasive catheters provides more detailed data, including local brain blood flow and oxygen, as well as metabolism. It may well be that invasive catheters are superior at identifying the more occult, albeit local, instances of brain hypoxia.

With regard to available interventions, there is no doubt that—by modifying MAP, blood oxygen and carbon dioxide levels—brain oxygenation can be manipulated. Whether this results in improved oxygen utilization is less clear. The approach taken in TBI care with a multimodal approach to alleviate ischemia appears very interesting [50], but will no doubt be challenging to put into practice in the general cardiac arrest population. Until more evidence is available, we should aim to treat patients according to current guidelines that include targeting a MAP greater than 65 mmHg, normocapnia with a PaCO2 of 4.5–6.0 kPa, and a PaO2 of 10–13 kPa.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Laver S, Farrow C, Turner D, Nolan J. Mode of death after admission to an intensive care unit following cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:2126–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sekhon MS, Ainslie PN, Griesdale DE. Clinical pathophysiology of hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest: a “two-hit” model. Crit Care. 2017;21:90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nolan JP, Neumar RW, Adrie C, Aibiki M, Berg RA, Bottiger BW, et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A Scientific Statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Council on Stroke. Resuscitation. 2008;79:350–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kilgannon JH, Roberts BW, Jones AE, Mittal N, Cohen E, Mitchell J, et al. Arterial blood pressure and neurologic outcome after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2083–91.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roberts BW, Kilgannon JH, Chansky ME, Trzeciak S. Association between initial prescribed minute ventilation and post-resuscitation partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ameloot K, De Deyne C, Eertmans W, Ferdinande B, Dupont M, Palmers PJ, et al. Early goal-directed haemodynamic optimization of cerebral oxygenation in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest: the neuroprotect post-cardiac arrest trial. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1804–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jakkula P, Pettila V, Skrifvars MB, Hastbacka J, Loisa P, Tiainen M, et al. Targeting low-normal or high-normal mean arterial pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a randomised pilot trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:2091–101.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wihersaari L, Ashton NJ, Reinikainen M, Jakkula P, Pettila V, Hastbacka J, et al. Neurofilament light as an outcome predictor after cardiac arrest: a post hoc analysis of the COMACARE trial. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:39–48.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sekhon MS, Gooderham P, Menon DK, Brasher PMA, Foster D, Cardim D, et al. The burden of brain hypoxia and optimal mean arterial pressure in patients with hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:960–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, Vespa P, Bader MK, Brophy GM, et al. Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1189–209.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rivera-Lara L, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Geocadin RG, Healy RJ, Ziai W, Mirski MA. Cerebral autoregulation-oriented therapy at the bedside: a comprehensive review. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:1187–99.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Green DW, Kunst G. Cerebral oximetry and its role in adult cardiac, non-cardiac surgery and resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(Suppl 1):48–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Parnia S, Nasir A, Ahn A, Malik H, Yang J, Zhu J, et al. A feasibility study of cerebral oximetry during in-hospital mechanical and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:930–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Meex I, Dens J, Jans F, Boer W, Vanhengel K, Vundelinckx G, Heylen R, De Deyne C. Cerebral tissue oxygen saturation during therapeutic hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation. 2013;84:788–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Storm C, Leithner C, Krannich A, Wutzler A, Ploner CJ, Trenkmann L, et al. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation after cardiac arrest in 60 patients–a prospective outcome study. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1037–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Genbrugge C, Eertmans W, Meex I, Van Kerrebroeck M, Daems N, Creemers A, et al. What is the value of regional cerebral saturation in post-cardiac arrest patients? A prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2016;20:327.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ito N, Nishiyama K, Callaway CW, Orita T, Hayashida K, Arimoto H, et al. Noninvasive regional cerebral oxygen saturation for neurological prognostication of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective multicenter observational study. Resuscitation. 2014;85:778–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nishiyama K, Ito N, Orita T, Hayashida K, Arimoto H, Beppu S, et al. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring for predicting interventional outcomes in patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause: a prospective, observational, multicentre study. Resuscitation. 2015;96:135–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cournoyer A, Iseppon M, Chauny JM, Denault A, Cossette S, Notebaert E. Near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring during cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:851–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bougle A, Daviaud F, Bougouin W, Rodrigues A, Geri G, Morichau-Beauchant T, et al. Determinants and significance of cerebral oximetry after cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study. Resuscitation. 2016;99:1–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Saritas A, Cinleti BA, Zincircioglu C, Uzun U, Kose I, Senoglu N. Effect of regional cerebral oximetry to estimate neurologic prognostic outcomes in patients administered targeted temperature management. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36:2236–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sakurai A, Ihara S, Tagami R, Yamaguchi J, Sugita A, Kuwana T, et al. Parameters influencing brain oxygen measurement by regional oxygen saturation in postcardiac arrest patients with targeted temperature management. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2020;10:71–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jakkula P, Hastbacka J, Reinikainen M, Pettila V, Loisa P, Tiainen M, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2019;23:171.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pham P, Bindra J, Chuan A, Jaeger M, Aneman A. Are changes in cerebrovascular autoregulation following cardiac arrest associated with neurological outcome? Results of a pilot study. Resuscitation. 2015;96:192–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nakatani Y, Nakayama T, Nishiyama K, Takahashi Y. Effect of target temperature management at 32–34 degrees C in cardiac arrest patients considering assessment by regional cerebral oxygen saturation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Resuscitation. 2018;126:185–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schnaubelt S, Sulzgruber P, Menger J, Skhirtladze-Dworschak K, Sterz F, Dworschak M. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a predictor of return of spontaneous circulation and favourable neurological outcome—a review of the current literature. Resuscitation. 2018;125:39–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Takegawa R, Hayashida K, Rolston DM, Li T, Miyara SJ, Ohnishi M, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy assessments of regional cerebral oxygen saturation for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest: a review of clinical impact, evolution, and future directions. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:587930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    la Cour A, Greisen G, Hyttel-Sorensen S. In vivo validation of cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy: a review. Neurophotonics. 2018;5:040901.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Steiner LA, Pfister D, Strebel SP, Radolovich D, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M. Near-infrared spectroscopy can monitor dynamic cerebral autoregulation in adults. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10:122–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Diedler J, Zweifel C, Budohoski KP, Kasprowicz M, Sorrentino E, Haubrich C, et al. The limitations of near-infrared spectroscopy to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: the role of slow frequency oscillations. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:849–57.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Brady K, Joshi B, Zweifel C, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Easley RB, Hogue CW Jr. Real-time continuous monitoring of cerebral blood flow autoregulation using near-infrared spectroscopy in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Stroke. 2010;41:1951–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rivera-Lara L, Geocadin R, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Healy R, Radzik BR, Palmisano C, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy-derived cerebral autoregulation indices independently predict clinical outcome in acutely ill comatose patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020;32:234–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ameloot K, Genbrugge C, Meex I, Jans F, Boer W, Vander Laenen M, et al. An observational near-infrared spectroscopy study on cerebral autoregulation in post-cardiac arrest patients: time to drop ‘one-size-fits-all’ hemodynamic targets? Resuscitation. 2015;90:121–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sekhon MS, Smielewski P, Bhate TD, Brasher PM, Foster D, Menon DK, et al. Using the relationship between brain tissue regional saturation of oxygen and mean arterial pressure to determine the optimal mean arterial pressure in patients following cardiac arrest: a pilot proof-of-concept study. Resuscitation. 2016;106:120–5.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Griesdale DEG, Sekhon MS, Wood MD, Cardim D, Brasher PMA, McCredie V, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy to assess cerebral autoregulation and optimal mean arterial pressure in patients with hypoxic–ischemic brain injury: a prospective multicenter feasibility study. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2:e0217.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hoiland RL, Sekhon MS, Cardim D, Wood MD, Gooderham P, Foster D, Griesdale DE. Lack of agreement between optimal mean arterial pressure determination using pressure reactivity index versus cerebral oximetry index in hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2020;152:184–91.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Aneman A, Laurikalla J, Pham P, Wilkman E, Jakkula P, Reinikainen M, et al. Cerebrovascular autoregulation following cardiac arrest: protocol for a post hoc analysis of the randomized COMACARE pilot trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63:1272–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nolan JP, Soar J, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Moulaert VR, Deakin CD, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines for post-resuscitation care 2015: section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation. 2015;95:202–22.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wallin E, Larsson IM, Nordmark-Grass J, Rosenqvist I, Kristofferzon ML, Rubertsson S. Characteristics of jugular bulb oxygen saturation in patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62:1237–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hoiland RL, Robba C, Menon DK, Sekhon MS. Differential pathophysiologic phenotypes of hypoxic ischemic brain injury: considerations for post-cardiac arrest trials. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1969–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sekhon MS, Ainslie PN, Menon DK, Thiara SS, Cardim D, Gupta AK, et al. Brain hypoxia secondary to diffusion limitation in hypoxic ischemic brain injury postcardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:378–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rosenthal G, Hemphill JC 3rd, Sorani M, Martin C, Morabito D, Obrist WD, Manley GT. Brain tissue oxygen tension is more indicative of oxygen diffusion than oxygen delivery and metabolism in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1917–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jakkula P, Reinikainen M, Hastbacka J, Loisa P, Tiainen M, Pettila V, et al. Targeting two different levels of both arterial carbon dioxide and arterial oxygen after cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a randomised pilot trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:2112–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Young PJ, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Bernard S, Bray J, Jakkula P, et al. Conservative or liberal oxygen therapy in adults after cardiac arrest: an individual-level patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Resuscitation. 2020;157:15–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Eastwood GM, Schneider AG, Suzuki S, Peck L, Young H, Tanaka A, Martensson J, Warrillow S, McGuinness S, Parke R, Gilder E, McCarthy L, Galt P, Taori G, Eliott S, Lamac T, Bailey M, Harley N, Barge D, Hodgson CL, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Pebay A, Conquest A, Archer JS, Bernard S, Stub D, Hart GK, Bellomo R. Targeted therapeutic mild hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: a phase II multi-centre randomised controlled trial (the CCC trial). Resuscitation. 2016;104:83–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Eastwood GM, Nielsen N, Nichol AD, Skrifvars MB, French C, Bellomo R. Reported practice of temperature adjustment (alpha-stat v pH-stat) for arterial blood gases measurement among investigators from two major cardiac arrest trials. Crit Care Resusc. 2019;21:69–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Pynnonen L, Falkenbach P, Kamarainen A, Lonnrot K, Yli-Hankala A, Tenhunen J. Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest—cerebral perfusion and metabolism during upper and lower threshold normocapnia. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1174–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ameloot K, Jakkula P, Hastbacka J, Reinikainen M, Pettila V, Loisa P, et al. Optimum blood pressure in patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:812–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Albaeni A, Eid SM, Akinyele B, Kurup LN, Vaidya D, Chandra-Strobos N. The association between post resuscitation hemoglobin level and survival with good neurological outcome following Out Of Hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;99:7–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Okonkwo DO, Shutter LA, Moore C, Temkin NR, Puccio AM, Madden CJ, et al. Brain oxygen optimization in severe traumatic brain injury phase-II: a phase II randomized trial. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1907–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Publication costs were funded by a grant from Sigrid Juselius Stiftelse, Finland (Markus B Skrifvars).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Benedikt Skrifvars.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Markus Skrifvars reports lecture fees and travel grants from BARD Medical (Ireland).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skrifvars, M.B., Sekhon, M. & Åneman, E.A. Monitoring and modifying brain oxygenation in patients at risk of hypoxic ischaemic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Crit Care 25, 312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03678-3

Download citation