- Letter
- Open access
- Published:
Hyperthermia is a predictor of high mortality in patients with sepsis
Critical Care volume 24, Article number: 543 (2020)
To the Editor,
In a recent study, Shimazui et al. [1] reported that body temperature (BT) on ICU admission exhibited different predictive values in elderly and non-elderly patients with sepsis, and only hypothermia (BT < 36.0 °C) was associated with increased mortality in non-elderly patients while hyperthermia (BT > 38.3 °C) was not. A few issues should be noted.
First, the grouping method may underestimate the impact of hyperthermia. In the current study, the whole cohort was divided into the hyperthermia and non-hyperthermia groups, using a cutoff value of BT at 38.3 °C. One limitation is that under this grouping method, both hypothermia and normothermia were classified as non-hyperthermia. Thus, the comparison between the hyperthermia and non-hyperthermia groups could be susceptible to the proportion of patients with hypothermia. For instance, in two hypothetical cohorts (cohort 1: hypothermia n = 80, normothermia n = 20, hyperthermia n = 100 vs. cohort 2: hypothermia n = 20, normothermia n = 80, hyperthermia n = 100), the comparison of mortality between the hyperthermia and non-hyperthermia groups could be quite different in these two cohorts, as the non-hyperthermia group in cohort 1 (high proportion of hypothermia patients) may have high mortality. In addition, several studies [2] also reported that in sepsis, hyperthermia (Tmax) was also a significant risk for high mortality. Furthermore, one randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that fever control using external cooling to maintain BT between 36.5 and 37.0 °C significantly reduced mortality in septic shock [3]. For validation, we explored the association between BT and mortality in another cohort from MIMIC-III database (Fig. 1). A total of 4201 adult patients with sepsis were included. Consistent with the current study, different associations between BT and mortality were also found in old (≥ 75) and young (< 75) patients. However, in patients with age < 75, both hypothermia and hyperthermia exhibited increased trends of in-hospital mortality (Fig. 1 black bars).
Second, the author mentioned that the impact of hypothermia duration on mortality remained unclear. Noteworthy, in a median analysis of previous RCT [3], Schortgen et al. [4] found that 73% of the impact of external cooling on mortality was mediated by the duration of BT < 38.4 °C. Thus, focusing on a single BT record may increase the bias risk. Temperature load (TL) [5] may be a method to this limitation, defined as the sum of BT above/below the targeted temperature level multiplied by the duration (hours). For instance, the TL of hyperthermia (> 38.3 °C) within 72 h should be calculated as follows—step 1: \( \overline{t_i}=\frac{t_i+{\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{i}+1}}{2}-38.3 \); step 2: \( \mathrm{TL}={\sum}_{i=1}^{72}\overline{t_i}\times 1\ \mathrm{hour} \).
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Shimazui T, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Oshima T, Abe T, Ogura H, Shiraishi A, Kushimoto S, Saitoh D, Fujishima S, et al. Significance of body temperature in elderly patients with sepsis. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):387.
Wu DY, Lu SQ. The effects of abnormal body temperature on the prognosis of patients with septic shock. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2019. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 31895653. https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2019.0012.
Schortgen F, Clabault K, Katsahian S, Devaquet J, Mercat A, Deye N, Dellamonica J, Bouadma L, Cook F, Beji O, et al. Fever control using external cooling in septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(10):1088–95.
Schortgen F, Charles-Nelson A, Bouadma L, Bizouard G, Brochard L, Katsahian S. Respective impact of lowering body temperature and heart rate on mortality in septic shock: mediation analysis of a randomized trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(10):1800–8.
Rahmig J, Kuhn M, Neugebauer H, Juttler E, Reichmann H, Schneider H. Normothermia after decompressive surgery for space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction: a protocol-based approach. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):205.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
YS received funding from the Zhejiang medical and health science and technology project (no. 2018261355).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.Z. and W.C. came up with the question, and S.Z. was responsible for the writing. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, Y., Lou, Y. & Zhu, S. Hyperthermia is a predictor of high mortality in patients with sepsis. Crit Care 24, 543 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03263-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03263-0