- Correction
- Open access
- Published:
Correction to: The effect of corticosteroids on the mortality of patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Critical Care volume 24, Article number: 376 (2020)
Correction to: Critical Care (2019) 23:99
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2395-8
After publication of our article [1], we were made aware of some errors in our figures and tables. There have been no changes to the interpretation of the results, conclusions and applications of our article.
In Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, for Perez-Padilla 2009, the events/total in the corticosteroids and control groups should be 3/5 and 4/13, respectively, instead of 4/7 and 8/11 in the original article. For Viasus 2011, the events/total in the corticosteroids and control groups should be 3/37 and 4/160, respectively, instead of 3/37 and 7/160 in the original article. Thus, in our final systematic review and meta-analysis, 2,562 patients were treated with corticosteroids and 3,986 with non-corticosteroids. The statistical heterogeneity in the analysis of the effect of corticosteroids on mortality should be (I2=83%, P<0.00001), instead of (I2=84%, P<0.00001) in the original article. And, the results of the analysis about mortality should be (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.42~2.55, Z=4.33, P<0.0001), instead of (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.30~2.36, Z=3.71, P=0.0002). Similarly, the results of the subgroup mortality in H1N1 patients should be (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23~3.02, Z=2.85, P=0.004), rather than (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.15~2.47, Z=2.68, P=0.007).
Otherwise, Lee 2014 should be Lee 2015.
In Fig. 5, the SD for the corticosteroids and control groups in Brun-Buisson’s study should be 19.26 and 14.07, respectively, instead of 14.07 and 19.26 in the original article. Thus, the statistical heterogeneity of the analysis on ICU LOS should be (I2=30%, P=0.23), instead of (I2=38%, P=0.21). And the result of this analysis should be (MD 2.12, 95% CI 1.15~3.09, Z=4.30, P<0.0001), rather than (MD 2.14, 95% CI 1.17~3.10, Z=4.35, P<0.0001) in the original article.
In Fig. 6, the study ID “Dias 2012” should be “Viasus 2011”.
In table 1, the antiviral drug in Lee’s study should be NR.
In table 2, for Brun-Buisson’s study, the Male (n, %) in the corticosteroids group should be 36(43.4), and 69(55.2) in the control group. For Moreno’s study, the APACHE II in the corticosteroids group should be 15(10-20) and 14(10-19) in the control group.
And, the age and male in the control group of Viasus’s study should be NR.
Reference
Ni YN, Chen G, Sun J, Liang BM, Liang ZA. The effect of corticosteroids on mortality of patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care (London, England). 2019;23:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2395-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Ni, YN., Chen, G., Sun, J. et al. Correction to: The effect of corticosteroids on the mortality of patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 24, 376 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02996-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02996-2